Dysphagia in patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery: Assessment using a functional scale. / Disfagia en pacientes intervenidos de atresia de esófago: valoración con una escala funcional.

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is defined as difficulty swallowing. Up to 84% of patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery have dysphagia beyond the neonatal period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery from 2005 to 2021 was carried out. The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) was used to assess dysphagia in 4 age groups (< 1 year old, 1-4 years old, 5-11 years old, and > 11 years old). FOIS scores < 7 or symptoms of choking, impaction, or food aversion were regarded as dysphagia. RESULTS: 63 patients were analyzed. 74% (47/63) had dysphagia during follow-up. Prevalence was 50% in patients < 1 year old (FOIS mean 4.32), 77% in patients aged 1-4 (FOIS mean 5.61), 45% in patients aged 5-11 (FOIS mean 5.87), and 38% in patients > 11 years old (FOIS mean 6.8). The most frequent causes of dysphagia were stenosis, which occurred in 38% of the patients (n=24), and gastroesophageal reflux (n=18), which was present in 28% of the patients. Both conditions were associated with significantly lower mean FOIS scores (p< 0.05) in the patients under 11 years of age. Differences (p< 0.05) were found in the dysphagia-associated perinatal factors in the various age groups, with longer ventilation assistance times, parenteral nutrition, and hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia is an extremely frequent symptom at any given age in patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery. A standardized, cross-disciplinary follow-up is key to improve quality of life.

INTRODUCCION: La disfagia se define como dificultad en el proceso de alimentación. Hasta un 84% de pacientes intervenidos de atresia de esófago tienen disfagia más allá del periodo neonatal. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de serie de casos intervenidos por atresia de esófago 2005-2021. Se utilizó la escala FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) para cuantificar la disfagia en 4 grupos de edad (menores de 1 año, 1-4 años, 5-11 años y mayores de 11 años). Se consideró disfagia cualquier valor de FOIS < 7 o síntomas de atragantamiento, impactación o aversión alimentaria. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron datos de 63 pacientes. El 74% (47/63) presentó disfagia durante el seguimiento. La prevalencia fue del 50% < 1 año (media FOIS 4.32), 77% 1-4 años (media FOIS 5.61), 45% 5-11 años (media FOIS 5.87) y 38% > 11 años (media FOIS 6.8). Las causas más frecuentes de disfagia fueron la estenosis, que presentó un 38% de los pacientes (n= 24) y el reflujo gastroesofágico (n= 18), que presentó a su vez un 28% de los pacientes. Ambas condiciones se asociaron con unos valores medios de FOIS significativamente menores (p< 0,05) en los pacientes menores de 11 años. Se encontraron diferencias (p< 0,05) en factores perinatales asociados a disfagia en los distintos periodos de edad, a destacar mayor tiempo medio de: asistencia ventilatoria, nutrición parenteral e ingreso hospitalario. CONCLUSIONES: La disfagia es un síntoma extremadamente frecuente a cualquier edad en los pacientes intervenidos de atresia de esófago. Un seguimiento estandarizado y multidisciplinar es esencial para mejorar la calidad de vida de estos pacientes.

Gastric Mucosal Viability Assessment Using 99mTcO4 in a Case of Pure Esophageal Atresia After Isoperistaltic Gastric Tube Replacement.

ABSTRACT: Gastric surface mucosal cells are responsible for the uptake and secretion of 99mTcO4, a feature that has been used in imaging heterotopic gastric mucosa. We used the same principle to look for gastric mucosal viability in this case of pure esophageal atresia admitted for cervical stomal closure after a previous isoperistaltic gastric tube (IGT) replacement procedure. 99mTcO4 scintigraphy was done after encountering a failure to maneuver the esophagoscope through the IGT. The study was helpful in assessing the loss of gastric mucosal viability in an intervening segment of the IGT.

Assessment of MRI and Ultrasound Screening for Tethered Cord Syndrome in Patients Diagnosed With Esophageal Atresia/Tracheoesophageal Fistula.

INTRODUCTION: Infants with esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) undergo screening for tethered cord syndrome (TCS) via ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Existing literature lacks data to guide optimal timing of screening and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often delayed until 3-6 mo of age, when it is frequently forgotten. Detethering surgery has a high rate of success in patients with TCS and is often performed prophylactically due to potential irreversible deficits. This study aims to improve screening procedure for infants with EA/TEF. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done of all EA/TEF patients treated over 6 y (n = 79). The study examined how often each imaging modality was performed and identified a TCS lesion, as well as age of screening/surgical intervention. RESULTS: Screening for TCS was done with MRI 58% of the time and US 15% of the time. However, 38% of patients did not undergo any screening. Out of the patients with TCS on MRI (n = 19, 41.3%), 73.7% had neurosurgery. Of patients who underwent ultrasound (US) (n = 12), nine patients also had MRI later: two reported TCS lesions and subsequently had neurosurgery. Surgical infection rates and complications were 0/14. CONCLUSIONS: MRI demonstrated a higher rate of detecting TCS lesions than US, and patients with TCS frequently had detethering. Patients with ≥3 VACTERL or vertebral anomalies had a higher incidence of TCS on MRI. Patients with vertebral anomalies reported false negative ultrasounds in two cases, suggesting the potential superiority of MRI screening in this subgroup. A third of children did not undergo any imaging and this will require a process improvement.

Functional, nutritional, and developmental assessment of gastric transposition and colonic interposition: Long-term follow-up outcome analysis.

PURPOSE: The choice of Esophageal replacement (ER) depends on surgeons' preference and patients' anatomical condition. A cross-sectional study was done to compare the long-term outcomes of two methods of ER, Gastric transposition (GT) and Colonic interposition (CI). METHODS: Children who had undergone ER from January 1997 to December 2017 with a minimum of two-year post-ER follow-up were evaluated by anthropometry, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, gastroesophageal reflux study, gastric emptying test, pulmonary function test and blood tests. RESULTS: Twenty-six (Male:female=17:9) children were recruited. The median age at ER was 13 months (interquartile range 9-40 months) and mean follow-up post-ER was 116.7 ± 76.4 months (range 24-247 months). GT:CI was done in 15(57.7%):11(42.3%) cases. A greater number of abnormal oral contrast studies (p = 0.02) and re-operations (p = 0.05) were documented as baseline characteristics with CI group. The presence of gastroesophageal reflux 9/23(39.1%), duodenogastric reflux 6/24(25%), delayed gastric emptying 6/25(24%), abnormal pulmonary function test 14/22(63.6%) were documented during the study period. However, there was no significant(p>0.05) difference in nutritional, developmental and functional outcomes of both operative methods of ER in the study. CONCLUSION: Assessment of nutritional, developmental and functional parameters in children after ER reveals good long-term results. There was no significant difference in CI and GT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Comparative study; II.

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF RISK-BENEFIT RATIO OF USE OF SILICONE BOUGIE VERSUS ALTERNATIVE METHODS IN POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA.

The aim of the present research is to assess the beneficial and adverse effects of silicone bougie use in comparison to alternative methods of post-operative management of esophageal atresia. The study was carried on 28 patients treated at our healthcare institution for esophageal atresia during the period from May, 2017 to September, 2020. As an alternative to the use of esophageal bougie these patients were managed postoperatively, by utilizing the contrast imaging of the esophagus on the 7th and 14th days after surgery, and at the age of 1, 3, 6 months and one year. Unless the esophageal stricture has developed, the procedures are repeated annually until the age of 5. The aim of utilizing the contrast imaging technique is to prevent the stricture of the esophagus and recurrence of trachea esophageal fistula.

Validation of low-cost models for minimal invasive surgery training of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia.

BACKGROUND: Minimal invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly used for the correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and esophageal atresia (EA). It is important to master these complex procedures, preferably preclinically, to avoid complications. The aim of this study was to validate recently developed models to train these MIS procedures preclinically. METHODS: Two low cost, reproducible models (one for CDH and one for EA) were validated during several pediatric surgical conferences and training sessions (January 2017-December 2018), used in either the LaparoscopyBoxx or EoSim simulator. Participants used one or both models and completed a questionnaire regarding their opinion on realism (face validity) and didactic value (content validity), rated on a five-point-Likert scale. RESULTS: Of all 60 participants enrolled, 44 evaluated the EA model. All items were evaluated as significantly better than neutral, with means ranging from 3.7 to 4.1 (p < 0.001). The CDH model was evaluated by 48 participants. All items scored significantly better than neutral (means 3.5-3.9, p < 0.001), with exception of the haptics of the simulated diaphragm (mean 3.3, p = 0.054). Both models were considered a potent training tool (means 3.9). CONCLUSION: These readily available and low budget models are considered a valid and potent training tool by both experts and target group participants. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Using multidimensional scaling in model choice for congenital oesophageal atresia: similarity analysis of human autopsy organ weights with those from a comparative assessment of Aachen Minipig and Pietrain piglets.

Swine models had been popular in paediatric oesophageal surgery in the past. Although being largely replaced by rodent models, swine experienced a revival with the establishment of minipig models. However, none of them has ever been investigated for similarity to humans. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether three-week old Pietrain piglets and three-month old Aachen Minipigs are suitable for experimental paediatric oesophageal atresia surgery. We tested the operation's feasibility, performed a necropsy, weighed organs, measured organ length and calculated relative weights and lengths, and measured laboratory parameters. We used multidimensional scaling to assess the similarity of the swine breeds with previously published human data. Pietrain piglets had a higher a priori bodyweight than Aachen Minipigs (Δ = 1.31 kg, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-2.23, p = 0.015), while snout-to-tail length was similar. Pietrain piglets had higher absolute and relative oesophageal lengths (Δ = 5.43 cm, 95% CI: 2.2-8.6; p = 0.0062, q1* = 0.0083 and Δ = 11.4%, 95% CI: 5.1-17.6; p = 0.0025, q3* = 0.0053). Likewise, absolute and relative small intestinal lengths were higher in Pietrains, but all other parameters did not differ, with the exception of minor differences in laboratory parameters. Multidimensional scaling revealed three-week old Pietrain piglets to be similar to two-month old humans based on their thoracoabdominal organ weights. This result indicates three-week old Pietrain piglets are a suitable model of paediatric oesophageal atresia surgery, because clinically many procedures are performed at around eight weeks age. Three-month old Aachen Minipigs were more dissimilar to eight-week old humans than three-week old Pietrain piglets.

Assessment of the Concerns of Caregivers of Children with Repaired Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula Related to Feeding-Swallowing Difficulties.

The study aimed to assess concerns of caregivers of children with EA-TEF related to feeding-swallowing difficulties, compare the concerns according to type of atresia and repair time, and investigate its relationship with time to start oral feeding. Caregivers accompanying 64 children with EA-TEF were included. Age, sex, type of atresia, repair time, and time to start oral feeding were noted. Parents completed the Turkish version of the Feeding/Swallowing Impact Survey (T-FS-IS) to assess the concerns of caregivers related to feeding-swallowing difficulties. The T-FS-IS has three subscales including daily activities, worry, and feeding difficulties. The median age of patients was 3 (min = 1, max = 12) years, of which 57.8% were male. 43.8% of cases were isolated-EA, and 56.3% were EA-distal TEF. 57.8% of cases received early repair, and 42.2% had delayed repair. The median time to start oral feeding was 4 weeks (min = 1, max = 128). The mean scores of daily activities, worry, feeding difficulties, and total score from the T-FS-IS were 2.43 ± 1.18, 2.73 ± 1.28, 2.10 ± 0.97, and 2.44 ± 1.09, respectively. Caregivers of children with isolated-EA reported more problems in total score and all subscales of the T-FS-IS than EA-distal TEF (p < 0.01). Caregivers of children who received delayed repair reported more problems in total score and all subscales of the T-FS-IS than children with early repair (p < 0.05). Moderate to strong correlations were found between the T-FS-IS and time to start oral feeding (p < 0.01, r = 0.55-0.65). This study suggests that caregivers of children with isolated-EA and/or delayed repair and/or delay in oral intake may have higher concerns related to feeding-swallowing difficulties.

Neonatal surgery in low- vs. high-volume institutions: a KID inpatient database outcomes and cost study after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, esophageal atresia, and gastroschisis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The volume-outcome relationship and optimal surgical volumes for repair of congenital anomalies in neonates is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective study of infants who underwent diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), gastroschisis (GS), and esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) repair at US hospitals using the Kids' Inpatient Database 2009-2012. Distribution of institutional volumes was calculated. Multi-level logistic/linear regressions were used to determine the association between volume and mortality, length of stay, and costs. RESULTS: Total surgical volumes were 1186 for CDH, 1280 for EA/TEF, and 3372 for GS. Median case volume per institution was three for CDH and EA/TEF, and four for GS. Hospitals with annual case volumes ≥ 75th percentile were considered high volume. Approximately, half of all surgeries were performed at low-volume hospitals. No clinically meaningful association between volume and outcomes was found for any procedure. Median cost was greater at high- vs. low-volume hospitals [CDH: $165,964 (p < 0.0001) vs. $104,107, EA/TEF: $85,791 vs. $67,487 (p < 0.006), GS: $83,156 vs. $72,710 (p < 0.0009)]. CONCLUSIONS: An association between volume and outcome was not identified in this study using robust outcome measures. The cost of care was higher in high-volume institutions compared to low-volume institutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Management of esophageal atresia and early predictive factors of mortality and morbidity in a developing country.

The aim of this study is to investigate management and outcome in esophageal atresia (EA) and to identify early predictive factors of morbidity and mortality in a developing country. Charts of neonates with repaired EA from 2007 to 2016 were reviewed. Patients' characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to identify predictors of complicated evolution. Forty-two cases were collected. There were 14 girls and 28 boys. Only one patient had antenatal diagnosis (2.3%). The mean gestational age was 38 weeks. Nine patients (21.4%) weighed less than 2.5 kg. Seventeen (40.4%) patients had associated malformations most commonly cardiac (9/17). Thirteen patients had delayed diagnosis (30.9%). Thirty-nine (92.8%) patients underwent primary esophageal anastomosis. Overall survival was 76.2%. Nineteen patients (57% of survivals) had complicated evolution before the age of one year and 15 patients (46.8% of survivals) developed complications after the age of one year. Perinatal variables associated with mortality were prematurity (p = 0.004, OR = 5.4, IC95% = [1.13-25.80]), low birth weight (p = 0.023, OR = 7, IC95% = [1.38-35.47]), cardiac malformations (p = 0.006, OR = 10.5, IC95% = [2.03-54.27]) and delayed diagnosis (p = 0.005, OR = 10.11, IC95% = [2.005-50.980]). Variables associated with short-term and middle-term complications were duration of intubation (p = 0.019, OR = 0.118, IC95% = [0.019-0.713]) and the presence of short-term complications (p = 0.016, OR = 7.33, IC95% = [1.467-36.664]) respectively. These factors may be used to identify patients who will benefit from more intensive follow-up program.

Esophageal atresia, Europe, and the future: BAPS Journal of Pediatric Surgery Lecture.

Europe has changed remarkably over the past decades and so have concepts and outcomes of esophageal atresia repair. In this article, both the efforts to create a united Europe and the achievements in dealing with esophageal atresia from the 1950s on are outlined. Furthermore, this paper deals with the future of pediatric surgery and is focused on two aspects: the "Fourth Industrial Revolution" which builds on the digital revolution, artificial intelligence and robotics, and its potential impact on pediatric surgery and the life of patients. I suggest that pediatric surgeons should participate and lead in the development of machine learning, data control, assuring appropriate use of machines, control misuse, and in particular ensure appropriate maintenance of ethical standards. Changes in health care structures within Europe, in particular the effect of centralization, will affect the concept of treatment for patients with rare diseases.

Utilizing stricture indices to predict dilation of strictures after esophageal atresia repair.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic stricture is the most common postoperative complication in infants undergoing repair of esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). Stricture indices (SIs) are used to predict infants at risk for stricture requiring dilation. We sought to determine the most accurate SI and optimal timing for predicting anastomotic dilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of infants undergoing repair of EA/TEF between 2008 and 2013 was performed. Esophagrams were used to calculate four SIs (upper pouch esophageal anastomotic stricture index [U-EASI], lower pouch esophageal anastomotic stricture index [L-EASI], lateral SI, and anterior/posterior SI). The best performing SI was identified. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if a first or second esophagram SI threshold was associated with dilation. A receiver operating characteristic curve measured the accuracy of the model using SIs to predict dilation. RESULTS: Of 45 EA/TEF infants included, 20 (44%) had postoperative strictures requiring dilation. As the best performing SI, logistic regression analysis showed that U-EASI as a continuous variable was predictive of dilation (P = 0.03) but was not significant at U-EASI ≤ 0.37. However, U-EASI ≤ 0.37 was associated with needing earlier dilation. On second esophagram (median, 38 days), U-EASI of ≤0.39 was significantly associated with dilation (OR: 7.8, 95% CI: 1.05-57.58, P = 0.04). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the U-EASI model controlling for days to esophagram demonstrated improved predictive ability from first (AUC 0.73) to second esophagram (AUC 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Calculation of the SI utilizing a U-EASI ≤ 0.39 on the delayed esophagram is associated with future anastomotic dilation. A multi-institutional study is necessary to confirm the predictive ability of the U-EASI.

Development and pilot-testing of a condition-specific instrument to assess the quality-of-life in children and adolescents born with esophageal atresia.

The survival rate of children with esophageal atresia has today reached 95%. However, children are at risk of chronic morbidity related to esophageal and respiratory dysfunction, and associated anomalies. This study describes the pilot testing of a condition-specific health-related quality-of-life instrument for children with esophageal atresia in Sweden and Germany, using a patient-derived development approach consistent with international guidelines. Following a literature review, standardized focus groups were conducted with 30 Swedish families of children with esophageal atresia aged 2-17 years. The results were used for item generation of two age-specific pilot questionnaire versions. These were then translated from Swedish into German with considerations of linguistic and semantical perspectives. The 30-item pilot questionnaire for children aged 2-7 years was completed by 34 families (parent report), and the 50-item pilot questionnaire for children aged 8-17 years was completed by 52 families (51 child report, 52 parent report), with an overall response rate of 96% in the total sample. Based on predefined psychometric criteria, poorly performing items were removed, resulting in an 18-item version with three domains (Eating, Physical health and treatment, Social isolation and stress,) for children aged 2-7 years and a 26-item version with four domains (Eating, Social relationships, Body perception, and Health and well-being) for children aged 8-17 years. Both versions demonstrated good internal consistency reliability and acceptable convergent and known-groups validity for the total scores. The study identified specific health-related quality-of-life domains for pediatric patients with esophageal atresia, highlighting issues that are important for follow-up care. After field testing in a larger patient sample, this instrument can be used to enhance the evaluation of pediatric surgical care.

Preliminary Study of Video-Based Pediatric Endoscopic Surgical Skill Assessment Using a Neonatal Esophageal Atresia/Tracheoesophageal Fistula Model.

PURPOSE: Thoracoscopic esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) repair in neonates is technically difficult because of the small working space and fragility of tissues. This study aimed to show the construct validity of the neonatal EA/TEF simulator by video-based assessment of endoscopic suturing skill. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A rapid-prototyped neonatal chest model with an artificial esophagus model similar to the actual neonatal esophagus was developed. Forty pediatric surgeons performed an endoscopic intracorporeal suturing task and a knot-tying task using the model, and a questionnaire survey was administered. Each task was video recorded and assessed using two skill assessment methods (the 29-point checklist method and the error assessment sheet method). The task completion time and the number of manipulations were measured. RESULTS: With regard to experience in performing thoracoscopic TEF repair, the experienced surgeons (ESs, ≥3 EA/TEF repair experiences, n = 6) were significantly superior to the inexperienced surgeons (ISs, <3 experiences, n = 34) in all metrics. Upon comparison by the pediatric Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification (ESSQ) status, there were no significant differences in all metrics between the ESSQ-qualified (n = 15) and nonqualified (n = 25) surgeons. The qualified ESs (n = 6) were significantly superior to the qualified ISs (n = 9) in all metrics. CONCLUSION: Video-based endoscopic surgical skill assessment using the neonatal EA/TEF simulator could differentiate ESs from ISs. The construct validity of the simulator was demonstrated, and the simulator would be useful especially for practicing thoracoscopic EA/TEF procedures.

Assessment of Clinical Symptoms and Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Monitoring in Children After Thoracoscopic Repair of Esophageal Atresia and Distal Tracheoesophageal Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Motility disturbances of the esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are observed frequently in children after repair of congenital esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). Recently, in many pediatric surgical centers, thoracoscopic repair was introduced, which theoretically would change the postoperative course. OBJECTIVES: The goal of the study was to assess physical development, disease symptoms, and GERD symptom frequency in children who underwent thoracoscopic surgery of congenital EA/TEF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study comprised 22 children (14 boys and 8 girls), aged 16 to 79 months (average age 47.3 months) after surgery of EA/TEF. Clinical symptoms and physical development were analyzed. In 19 children, multichannel intraluminal esophageal impedance connected with pH-metry (MII/pH) was performed. In 11 patients, esophagogastroduodenoscopy with a histological study of mucosa samples was done. RESULTS: The most frequent symptoms were dysphagia, belching, cough and recurrent bronchitis. In 31.5% of the children, body mass deficiency was observed and in 28.6%, low body mass and short stature. Prematurity was present in half of the patients. Depending on the result of the MII/pH study, the children were divided into two groups: 10 children with GERD and 9 children without diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. In the 10 with GERD, acid reflux was diagnosed in 9 and non-acid reflux was diagnosed in one. MII/pH demonstrated statistically significant differences in the number of reflux episodes, reflux index, bolus exposure index, mean time of esophageal exposure and acid exposure and mean acid clearance time in children with GERD in comparison to children without this disease. In 36.4% of children who underwent endoscopy, esophagitis was diagnosed, esophageal stricture in 18% and gastric metaplasia in 9.1%. CONCLUSIONS: In children who underwent corrective thoracoscopic surgery of EA/TEF, GERD caused by motility disorders of the esophagus was frequently observed. These children require constant monitoring and early treatment of the complication.

Validation of an inanimate low cost model for training minimal invasive surgery (MIS) of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (AE/TEF) repair.

UNLABELLED: We present the results of the validation of an inanimate model created for training thoracoscopic treatment of esophageal atresia with lower tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used different domestic materials such as a piece of wood (support), corrugated plastic tubes (PVC) of different sizes to simulate ribs, intercostal spaces, trachea and spine and tubular latex balloons to simulate the esophagus and lungs to make the basic model. This device was inserted into the thoracic cavity of a rubber dummy simulating a 3kg newborn with a work area volume of 50ml. The model was designed taking into account the experience of doing this procedure in neonates. The cost of the materials used was 50 US$. Regular video endoscopic equipment and 3mm instruments were used. Thirty-nine international faculty or pediatric surgeons attending hands on courses with different levels of training in minimal invasive surgery (MIS) repair of EA/TEF performed the procedure in the model. We compared the performance of the practitioners with their experience in thoracoscopic repair of EA. A Likert-type scale was used to evaluate results. Previous experience in MIS, anatomical appearance of the model, surgical anatomy compared to a real patient, and utility as a training method were analyzed. We also used a checklist to assess performance. We evaluated: number of errors and types of injuries, quality of the anastomosis, and duration of procedure. To analyze the results we used a T-test, chi-square test and Excel® database to match up some results. RESULTS: Thirty-nine questionnaires were completed. Seven surgeons were experts (≥30 TEF/EA repairs as surgeon), 10 had intermediate level of experience (5 to 29 repairs as surgeon) and 22 were beginners (less than 5 repairs). To simplify the analysis we divided the respondents into low experience LE (<5 real procedures-beginners; n=22) and high experience HE (intermediate, 10; and experts, 7; n=17). In relation to the anatomical characteristics of the model, 94.48% (n=37) respondents considered that the model has a high degree of similarity or good similarity; in relation to surgical anatomy 88.2% (n=34) respondents considered that the model has a high degree of similarity or good similarity; 87.17% (n=34) respondents considered that the model can generate a good amount of skills and/or can generate great majority of skills to EA/TEF repair; and 12.82% (n=5) respondents consider that it can generate some skills or a few skills, only in relation to trocar placement, one of the surveyed items. The number of errors was 29±7 SD (20 to 51) for the low experience group (LE) and 9±6 SD (1 to 20) for the high experience group (HE) (P value<0.0001). Time in minutes was significantly lower in the HE group (40±9 SD; 26 to 58min), in relation with LE (81±19 SD; 49 to 118min) (P<0.0001, T-test). Deficient or incomplete anastomosis also showed differences: 7 (32%) in the LE group and 1 (6%) in the HE group (P = 0.04, chi-square test). We saw a correlation between the previous experience of the surgeon and their performance in the model considering operating time, quality of anastomosis and peripheral tissue damage. According to the suggestions registered in the questionnaires, we have now improved the model. We have also started using it in a scenario to simulate the whole neonatal MIS operative room setting and team work.

Weekday vs. weekend repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula.

PURPOSE: We hypothesize that weekend esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) repair has worse outcomes compared to procedures performed on weekdays. METHODS: Kids' Inpatient Database (1997-2009) was searched for EA/TEF in infants admitted at <8days of life. Cases were limited to patients who underwent repair during their hospitalization. Risk-adjusted multivariate analysis (MVA) compared complications, mortality, and resource utilization (length of stay [LOS] total charges [TC]) between weekday and weekend procedures. RESULTS: Overall, 861 EA/TEF cases with known day of repair were identified. Cohort survival was 96%. On risk-adjusted MVA, complication rates were higher with EA/TEF repair on a weekend (OR: 2.2) compared to a weekday. Additionally, complications (OR: 6.5) and LOS (OR: 9.3) were found to be higher among African American children compared to Caucasians. LOS was higher in patients with Medicaid (OR: 2.4) and repairs performed at non-teaching hospitals (OR: 3.2). Weekend vs. weekday procedure had no significant effect on mortality or resource utilization. CONCLUSION: By risk-adjusted MVA, increased complication rates for EA/TEF are seen in patients undergoing repair on weekends compared to weekdays. Additionally, African American children experienced higher complication rates compared to Caucasians. LOS after repair varies according to race, payer status, and hospital characteristics.

Early complications after esophageal atresia repair: analysis of a German health insurance database covering a population of 8 million.

The treatment of esophageal atresia is not centralized in Germany. Therefore, high numbers of departments are involved. Data on the results of esophageal atresia repair from Germany are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results after repair of esophageal atresia based on unbiased data of a German health insurance. We aimed to determine whether characteristics of the departments had an impact on outcome and compared the results from this study with the literature data from centers with a high caseload. Data of a German health insurance covering ∼10% of the population were analyzed. All patients who had undergone esophageal atresia repair from January 2007 to August 2012 were included. Follow-up data of 1 year postoperatively were analyzed. The potential impact of various characteristics of the treating surgical institutions was assessed. Results were compared with the latest international literature. Seventy-five patients with esophageal atresia underwent reconstructive surgery in 37 departments. The incidences of anastomotic leak (3%) and recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (7%) were comparable with the literature (both 2-8%). Anastomotic stricture required dilatation in 57% of patients (mean 5.1 ± 5.6 dilatations) comparing unfavorably to most, but not all international reports. During 1-year follow-up, 93% of the patients were readmitted at least once (mean 3.9 ± 3.1 admissions). The incidence of complications did not correlate with any of the characteristics of the treating institutions such as academic affiliation, the number of consultants, beds, and preterm infants treated per year (all P > 0.05). Based on unbiased data, postoperative results after repair of esophageal atresia in Germany are comparable with recently published reports from international single centers. A correlation between the complication rate and characteristics of the treating institutions was not identified.

[Esophageal Atresia Repair - Can We Influence the Schedule?]. / Ösophagusatresie und tracheoösophageale Fistel - ist der Zeitpunkt der Versorgung steuerbar?

UNLABELLED: The treatment of newborns with esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is associated with a great logistic effort. The aim of the presented study was to analyse the possibility to influence the time of surgery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Data from 30 neonates with EA and TEF regarding the date and mode of birth, biometric data and preoperative acid-base and blood gas values were collected retrospectively. The newborns were divided into two subgroups: birth between Monday and Thursday ("week"), and birth from Friday to Sunday ("weekend"). RESULTS: We observed a seasonal peak of births in November/December. The rate of prenatal ultrasound detection of polyhydramnions was 40%. In 14 of 16 cases with Caesarean section, maternal or foetal problems predicted the date and mode of delivery. In both groups, most newborns had an unimpaired postnatal adaptation. There were no significant differences regarding biometry. Delivery at the weekend was associated with later surgical repair (second vs. first day of life). Repeated estimations of acid-base and blood gas parameters over a median time span of 13 hours revealed a stable situation with a trend to normalisation. DISCUSSION: The time of birth is multifactorial and, in most cases, can neither be predicted nor influenced. Stable respiratory and metabolic parameters in the majority of patients allow a surgical intervention within a limited time frame during the first days of life. CONCLUSION: As it is hardly possible to plan the surgical procedure, an experienced team as well as neonatal intensive care facilities and operation room access must be available throughout the week.

Evaluation of Three Sources of Validity Evidence for a Synthetic Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia/Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair Simulator.

PURPOSE: Thoracoscopic esophageal atresia (EA)/tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) repair is technically challenging. We have previously reported our experiences with a high-fidelity hybrid model for simulation-based educational instruction in thoracoscopic EA/TEF, including the high cost of the tissue for these models. The purposes of this study were (1) to create a low-cost synthetic tissue EA/TEF repair simulation model and (2) to evaluate the content validity of the synthetic tissue simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of the literature and computed tomography images were used to create computer-aided drawings (CAD) for a synthetic, size-appropriate EA/TEF tissue insert. The inverse of the CAD image was then printed in six different sections to create a mold that could be filled with platinum-cured silicone. The silicone EA/TEF insert was then placed in a previously described neonatal thorax and covered with synthetic skin. Following institutional review board-exempt determination, 47 participants performed some or all of a simulated thoracoscopic EA/TEF during two separate international meetings (International Pediatric Endosurgery Group [IPEG] and World Federation of Associations of Pediatric Surgeons [WOFAPS]). Participants were identified as "experts," having 6-50 self-reported thoracoscopic EA/TEF repairs, and "novice," having 0-5 self-reported thoracoscopic EA/TEF repairs. Participants completed a self-report, six-domain, 24-item instrument consisting of 23 5-point rating scales and one 4-point Global Rating Scale. Validity evidence relevant to test content and response processes was evaluated using the many-facet Rasch model, and evidence of internal structure (interitem consistency) was estimated using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: A review of the participants' ratings indicates there were no overall differences across sites (IPEG versus WOFAPS, P=.84) or experience (expert versus novice, P=.17). The highest observed averages were 4.4 (Value of Simulator as a Training Tool), 4.3 (Physical Attributes-chest circumference, chest depth, and intercostal space), and 4.3 (Realism of Experience-fistula location). The lowest observed averages were 3.5 (Ability to Perform-closure of fistula), 3.7 (Ability to Perform-acquisition target trocar sites), 3.8 (Physical Attributes-landmark visualization), 3.8 (Ability to Perform-anastomosis and dissection of upper pouch), and 3.9 (Realism of Materials-skin). The Global Rating Scale was 2.9, coinciding with a response of "this simulator can be considered for use in neonatal TEF repair training, but could be improved slightly." Material costs for the synthetic EA/TEF inserts were less than $2 U.S. per insert. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully created a low-cost synthetic EA/TEF tissue insert for use in a neonatal thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair simulator. Analysis of the participants' ratings of the synthetic EA/TEF simulation model indicates that it has value and can be used to train pediatric surgeons, especially those early in their learning curve, to begin to perform a thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair. Areas for model improvement were identified, and these areas will be the focus for future modifications to the synthetic EA/TEF repair simulator.