Rapid Assessment of Tinnitus Complaints with a Modified Version of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey.

The objective of this project was to establish cutoff scores on the tinnitus subscale of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) using a large sample of United States service members (SM) with the end goal of guiding clinical referrals for tinnitus evaluation. A total of 4,589 SM undergoing annual audiometric surveillance were prospectively recruited to complete the THS tinnitus subscale (THS-T). A subset of 1,304 participants also completed the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). The original 5-point response scale of the THS (THS-T16) was modified to an 11-point scale (THS-T40) for some participants, to align with the response scale of the TFI. Age, sex, hearing loss, and self-reported tinnitus bother were also recorded. The THS-T was relatively insensitive to hearing, but self-reported bothersome tinnitus was significantly associated with the THS-T40 score. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine cutoff scores on the THS-T that aligned with recommended cutoff values for clinical intervention on the TFI. A cutoff of 9 on the THS-T40 aligns with a TFI cutoff of 25, indicating a patient may need intervention for tinnitus. A cutoff of 15 aligns with a TFI cutoff of 50, indicating that more aggressive intervention for tinnitus is warranted. The THS-T is a viable tool to identify patients with tinnitus complaints warranting clinical evaluation for use by hearing conservation programs and primary care clinics. The THS-T40 cutoff scores of 9 and 15 provide clinical reference points to guide referrals to audiology.

[Clinical protocol: audiological assessment of infants in Russian Federation. Part II]. / Protokol audiologicheskogo obsledovaniya detei pervogo goda zhizni v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Chast' II.

This is the second part of the previously published clinical protocol of audiological assessment in infants. The goal of the protocol is unification approaches to audiological diagnosis of the infants. The following sections were included in the second part of the protocol: behavioral testing in infants, testing sequence, duration of the examination and necessity in follow-up, hearing assessment in special cases (premature children, children with congenital infections, after meningitis, with external ear abnormalities, single-sided deafness, with hydrocephalus and shunts, with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, with mild hearing loss and otitis media with effusion), medical report.

Test-Retest Reliability of Audiometric Assessment in Individuals With Mild Dementia.

Importance: Accurate assessment of hearing is critically important regardless of a person's cognitive ability. The degree to which hearing can be reliably measured in adults with mild dementia has not been determined. Objective: To obtain quantitative measures of reliability to evaluate the degree to which audiologic testing can be accurately conducted in older adults with mild dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated-measures cross-sectional study consisted of a comprehensive audiologic assessment on 2 occasions separated by 1 to 2 weeks performed in the department of otolaryngology at the Washington University School of Medicine from December 3, 2018, to March 4, 2020. Participants were 15 older adults with a verified diagnosis of mild dementia and 32 older adults without a verified diagnosis of mild dementia who were recruited from the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center at Washington University in St Louis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Test-retest reliability was assessed for tympanometry, acoustic reflex thresholds, otoacoustic emissions, hearing sensitivity, speech reception threshold, speech perception in noise, and hearing handicap, using standard clinical audiology measures. Results: A total of 47 older adults (26 women; mean [SD] age, 74.8 [6.0] years [range, 53-87 years]), including 32 with normal cognitive function and 15 with very mild or mild dementia, completed the study protocol. For participants with mild dementia, high test-retest reliability (Spearman ρ > 0.80) was found for most measures typically included in a comprehensive audiometric evaluation. For acoustic reflex thresholds, agreement was moderate to high, averaging approximately 83% across frequencies for both groups. Scores for the screening Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly at time 1 and time 2 were highly correlated for the group with normal cognitive function (r = 0.84 [95% CI, 0.70-0.93]) and for the group with mild dementia (r = 0.96 [95% CI, 0.88-0.99]). For hearing thresholds, all rank-order correlations were above 0.80 with 95% CIs at or below 15% in width, with the exception of a moderate correlation of bone conduction thresholds at 500 Hz for the group with normal cognitive function (r = 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50-0.84]) and slightly wider 95% CIs for low-frequency bone conduction thresholds for both groups. For speech reception thresholds, correlations were high for groups with normal cognitive function (r = 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84-0.95]) and mild dementia (r = 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63-0.94]). Conclusions and Relevance: Test-retest reliability for hearing measures obtained from participants with mild dementia was comparable to that obtained from cognitively normal participants. These findings suggest that mild cognitive impairment does not preclude accurate audiologic assessment.

Comprehensive Community Screening of Otological Patients by Trained Technicians Using a Telemedicine Device: An Efficient and Cost-Effective Way to Triage Patients With Ear Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To emphasize the benefits of tele-otology in community screening of patients with ear diseases. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients screened and treated under the Shruti tele-otology program between 2013 and 2019 was conducted. It involved screening, diagnosis, medical management, surgical intervention, and rehabilitation using hearing aid. The study focused on underprivileged and underserved community of rural and urban slums across 12 states of India. The study was conducted using a telemedicine device called ENTraview, that is, a camera-enabled android phone integrated with an otoscope and audiometry screening. RESULT: A total of 810 746 people were screened, and incidence of various ear diseases was recorded. Ear problems were found in 265 615 (33%) patients, of which 151 067 (57%) had impacted wax, 46 792(18%) had chronic suppurative otitis media, 27 875 (10%) had diminished hearing, 12 729 (5%) had acute otitis media and acute suppurative otitis media (ASOM), and 27 152 (10%) had problems of foreign body, otomycosis, and so on. Of the total 265 615 referred patients, 20 986 (8%) reported for treatment and received treatment at a significantly reduced cost through Shruti program partners. The conversion rate of nonsurgical and surgical procedure was also compared, and it was found that, while 9% of the patients opted for nonsurgical treatment, only 3% opted for surgery in the intervention group giving a significant P value of .00001. CONCLUSION: The potential for telemedicine to reduce inequalities in health care is immense but remains underutilized. Shruti has largely been able to bridge this gap as it is an innovative, fast, and effective programs that address the ear ailment in the community.

Vestibular function assessment of Susac syndrome patients by the video head impulse test and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (retino-cochleo-cerebral vasculopathy, SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy characterized by the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss. In contrast to data regarding auditory function, data measuring vestibular function is sparse and the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the video head impulse test (vHIT) can serve as a confirmatory assessment of vestibulocochlear dysfunction in cases of suspected SuS. METHODS: Seven patients diagnosed with SuS underwent pure tone audiometry, a word recognition test, cVEMPs and the vHIT. RESULTS: Five patients were diagnosed with definite SuS, and two with probable SuS. Two patients were asymptomatic for hearing loss or tinnitus, and no sensorineural hearing loss was detected by audiograms. Four patients complained of tinnitus, and three patients reported experiencing vertigo. Three patients had abnormal cVEMPs results. All seven patients' vHIT results were normal, except for patient #2, who was one of the three who complained of vertigo. The calculated gain of her left anterior semicircular canal was 0.5, without saccades. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the results of the vHIT and cVEMPs among a group of patients with SuS. The results suggest that the vHIT should not be the only exam used to assess the function of the vestibular system of SuS patients.

Genetics of Hearing Impairment in North-Eastern Romania-A Cost-Effective Improved Diagnosis and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the main genetic causes for non-syndromic hearing impairment (NSHI) in the hearing impairment individuals from the North-Eastern Romania and proposed a cost-effective diagnosis protocol. METHODS: MLPA followed by Sanger Sequencing were used for all 291 patients included in this study. RESULTS: MLPA revealed abnormal results in 141 cases (48.45%): 57 (40.5%) were c.35delG homozygous, 26 (18.44%) were c.35delG heterozygous, 14 (9.93%) were compound heterozygous and 16 (11.35%) had other types of variants. The entire coding region of GJB2 was sequenced and out of 150 patients with normal results at MLPA, 29.33% had abnormal results: variants in heterozygous state: c.71G>A (28%), c.457G>A (20%), c.269T>C (12%), c.109G>A (12%), c.100A>T (12%), c.551G>C (8%). Out of 26 patients with c.35delG in heterozygous state, 38.46% were in fact compound heterozygous. CONCLUSIONS: We identified two variants: c.109G>A and c.100A>T that have not been reported in any study from Romania. MLPA is an inexpensive, rapid and reliable technique that could be a cost-effective diagnosis method, useful for patients with hearing impairment. It can be adaptable for the mutation spectrum in every population and followed by Sanger sequencing can provide a genetic diagnosis for patients with different degrees of hearing impairment.

Chance-level hit rates in closed-set, forced-choice audiometry and a novel utility for the significance test-based detection of malingering.

The primary aim of this study was to extend existing theory on the relationship between chance-level performance and the number of alternatives and trials in closed-set, forced-choice speech audiometry and sound localization methods. When calculating chance performance for closed-set, forced-choice experiments with multiple trials, the binomial distribution should be preferred over the simple 1/a probability, as the latter is appropriate only for single trial experiments. The historical use of constant hit rates for determining chance performance has been based upon the assumption that random hits are distributed evenly across multiple trials. For any closed-set, forced-choice task with 2 to 10 alternatives and 2 to 100 trials, we calculated the probability of obtaining any given hit rate due to random guessing alone according to the binomial distribution. Hit rates with probabilities p > 0.05 were interpreted as being likely to occur due to random chance alone, whereas hit rates with probabilities of p ≤ 0.05 were interpreted as being unlikely to occur due to chance alone. For sound localization experiments with speakers at fixed positions, the expected probability of a random hit was also calculated using the binomial distribution. The expected angular root mean square (rms) error in sound localization resulting from the random selection of sound sources was investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. A new aspect in the interpretation of test results was identified for situations in which the observed number of hits is much lower than would be expected due to chance alone. For test methods incorporating a relatively low number of alternatives and a sufficiently high, yet clinically feasible, number of trials, both upper and lower thresholds for chance-level performance could be identified. This lower threshold represents the lowest hit rate which can be expected through random chance alone. Extending interpretation of results to include this lower threshold affords the ability to not only identify performance significantly superior to that of chance, but also that significantly poorer than chance and thereby represents a simple method for the objective detection of malingering.

Field Application of Digital Technologies for Health Assessment in the 10,000 Families Study.

BACKGROUND: We field tested new-to-market portable, digital applications to assess hearing, pulmonary, and cognitive function to determine the feasibility of implementing these applications across a range of age groups in the pilot phase of the 10,000 Families Study (10KFS), a new Minnesota family-based prospective cohort study. METHODS: We followed manufacturer recommended protocols for audiometry (SHOEBOX Inc), spirometry (NuvoAir), and the digital clock drawing test (dCDT; Digital Cognition Technologies Inc). RESULTS: These digital devices were low cost and readily implemented in a 2.5-hour health fair visit with minimal training (2-3 hours) of study staff. To date, we have performed these measurements on 197 eligible 10KFS participants during an in-person clinic visit. A total of 37 children (age 4-17 years), 107 adults (18-64 years), and 53 seniors (≥65 years) were eligible to undergo hearing and pulmonary assessments. Children were less likely to successfully complete the hearing test (76%) compared with adults (86%) and seniors (89%). However, successful completion of the pulmonary assessment was high across all groups: 100% of children and seniors and 98% of adults. The dCDT was performed among those over the age of 40, and completion rates were 92% for those aged 41-64 and 94% for those ≥65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our field testing indicates these digital applications are easy and cost-effective to implement in epidemiologic studies. IMPACT: Digital applications provide exciting opportunities to collect data in population studies. Issues related to data privacy, data access, and reproducibility of measurements need to be addressed before deploying digital applications in epidemiologic studies.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Modernizing Population Science."

Field test of the Rapid Assessment of Hearing Loss survey protocol in Ntcheu district, Malawi.

Objective: (1) To test the feasibility of the Rapid Assessment of Hearing Loss (RAHL) survey protocol in Malawi (Ntcheu); (2) To estimate the prevalence and probable causes of hearing loss (adults 50+).Design: Cross-sectional population-based survey.Study sample: Clusters (n = 38) were selected using probability-proportionate-to-size-sampling. Within each cluster, 30 people aged 50+ were selected using compact-segment-sampling. All participants completed smartphone-based audiometry (hearTest). Prevalence was estimated using WHO definitions (PTA of thresholds 0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz in the better ear of >25 dB HL (any) and >40 dB HL (≥moderate)). Otoscopy and questionnaire were used to assess probable causes. Participants with hearing loss and/or ear disease were asked about care-seeking and barriers.Results: Four teams completed the survey in 24 days. 1080 of 1153 (93.7%) participants were examined. The median time to complete the protocol was 24 min/participant. Prevalence of hearing loss was 35.9% (95% CI = 31.6-40.2) (any level); and 10.0% (95% CI = 7.9-12.5) (≥moderate). The majority was classified as probable sensorineural. Nearly one third of people (30.9%) needed diagnostic audiology services and possible hearing aid fitting. Hearing aid coverage was <1%. Lack of perceived need was a key barrier.Conclusion: The RAHL is simple, fast and provides information about the magnitude and probable causes of hearing loss to plan services.

Asociaciones entre clase social e hipoacusia laboral / Associations between social class and labor hipoacusia

Introducción: la exposición a ruidos forma parte de nuestros hábitos cotidianos, culturales y de ocio. En el entorno de trabajo aparecen diferentes sonidos que puedenser perjudiciales para los oídos. El presente escrito trata de identificar la influencia que existe entre clase social e hipoacusia laboral en trabajadores de la ciudad de Cú-cuta, en edades comprendidas entre los 17 y los 70 años. Métodos: observacional, analítico y transversal; la población estudiada incluyó tra-bajadores del sector público y privado del municipio de Cúcuta, a quienes se les reali-zó un examen audiométrico ocupacional por parte del programa de Fonoaudiología. Resultados: se encontró que la mayoría de los trabajadores, un 54.05%, pertenece a una clase social baja; el 65% se expone a ruido en el trabajo, el 60% no utiliza ele-mentos de protección personal y el 30% presenta hipoacusia.Análisis y discusión: hay una asociación significativa entre la actividad laboral y la actividad extra laboral del grupo etario. Predomina el sexo masculino con una representación del 63%. Esto puede explicarse dado el contexto cultural en el que se realizó el estudio.Conclusiones: en Colombia, existe escasa información sobre la relación entre clase social e hipoacusia laboral. Se debe realizar un análisis de segregación socio-espacial tanto de los hogares como de la enfermedad, para así determinar qué enfermedades se asocian con la actividad laboral

Introduction: exposure to noise is part of our daily, cultural and leisure habits. In the work environment different sounds can be harmful to the ears. The present text tries to identify the influence that exists between social class and work-related hearing loss in the city of Cúcuta, aged between 17 and 70 years Methods: It is observational, analytical and cross-sectional. The studied population consisted of individuals working in the public and private sector of the municipality of Cúcuta. They underwent an occupational audiometric examination by the Speech-Audiology program.Results: It was determined that most of the workers, 54.05%, are members of a low social class; 65% of workers are exposed to noise at work, 60% of workers do not use personal protection elements and 30% of evaluated workers have hearing loss. Analysis and discussion: there is a significant association between work activity and non-work activity of the age group, predominant in males with a representation of 63%, this can be explained given the cultural context in which the study was conducted. Conclusions: in Colombia, there is little information on social class and work-related hearing loss. An analysis of socio-spatial segregation of both households and the disease must be carried out in order to determine which diseases are associated to work activity

To Scan or Not to Scan-A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Audiometric Protocols for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Vestibular Schwannomas.

INTRODUCTION: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are a rare cause of asymmetrical hearing loss, and routine screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be costly. At present, no consensus exists on what qualifies as "asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss" (ASNHL) and when a patient should be referred for screening. OBJECTIVES: 1) Evaluation of published audiometric protocols on the basis of sensitivity and specificity when applied to local clinical cohort of patients with ASNHL; 2) determination of clinical risks of missing VS and potential wastes in screening "radiologically normal" cases; 3) assessment of the cost of MRI screening. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with chart review in a 2-year (2015-2016) cohort of 1059 patients who underwent MRI screening and audiometry indicating sensorineural hearing loss. Fourteen previously published audiometric protocols were assessed for their sensitivity and specificity in guiding radiological diagnosis of VS, and cost analysis was performed. RESULTS: 6/14 audiometric protocols had a sensitivity greater than 85%. Diagnostic specificity ranged from 22.91 to 82.76%, clinical risks from 0 to 50%, and potential wastes from 17.24 to 77.09%. Average annual cost of screening was £64,069. Application of proposed local screening protocol had a projected cost saving of 32.19%. Cost of screening patients that benefit from treatment was compared with a utility function that quantified expected benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Development of an easy-to-apply algorithm incorporating high-sensitivity audiometric protocols may result in significant cost saving, with minimal clinical risk of missing cases. There was disparity between screening costs and monetary "benefit" of hearing.

Unpleasantness of Amplified Environmental Sound Used in Tinnitus Sound Therapy: A Preliminary Study of Clinical Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, our aim was to use environmental sounds amplified in the frequency region corresponding to the tinnitus frequency of individual patients and apply them as sound therapy in tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT). In this pilot study, we 1) investigated the unpleasantness of processed environmental sounds using the amplification, attenuation, and removal in different frequency regions; 2) compared the unpleasantness of processed sounds for older and younger groups of participants; and 3) determined the amplification level appropriate for a clinical test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We processed the sound of a river with three types of modification (amplified, attenuated, and notched) at a one-octave width of seven central frequencies, in the range 250-8000 Hz. Amplified and attenuated sounds were processed with five positive gains (+6, +12, +15.6, +18, and +20 dB) and two negative gains (-6 and -12 dB). Twenty-three older participants and 23 younger participants rated the unpleasantness of sounds using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: We found that, in the older group, there was no difference in unpleasantness among the three modifications. Older participants rated the level of unpleasantness as lower than younger participants for processed sounds in the high-frequency region. There were no marked differences among the amplification levels in the group of older participants. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, we decided that our clinical study would target older patients who had a tinnitus frequency over 4000 Hz and would compare the effect of an amplified sound with a 20 dB gain at the frequency corresponding to individual tinnitus with notched sound.

Use of otoacoustic emissions to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in a community preschool hearing screening program.

INTRODUCTION: Hearing loss substantially impacts pediatric development, and early identification improves outcomes. While intervening before school-entry is critical to optimize learning, early-childhood hearing screening practices are highly variable. Conditioned play audiometry (CPA) is the gold standard for preschool hearing screening, but otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing provides objective data that may improve screening outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of a community-based low-income preschool hearing program before and after implementation of OAE in a single-visit, two-tiered paradigm. We hypothesized that this intervention would reduce referral rates and improve follow-up while maintaining stable rates of diagnosed sensorineural hearing loss. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of 3257 children screened from July 2014-June 2016. Department of Public Health data were analyzed pre- and post-implementation of second-line OAE testing for children referred on CPA screening with targeted follow-up by DPH staff. Primary outcomes included referral rates, follow-up rates, and diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS: Demographics, pure-tone pass rates, and incidence of newly-diagnosed permanent hearing loss were similar across years. After intervention, overall pass rates increased from 92% to 95% (P = 0.0014), while only 0.7% remained unable to be tested (P<0.0001). 5% of children were unable to be tested by CPA screening but passed OAE testing, obviating further evaluation. Referral rate decreased from 8% to 5% (P = 0.0014), and follow-up improved from 36% to 91% (P<0.0001). Identification of pathology in children with follow-up increased from 19% to over 50%. Further, disparities in pass rates and ability to test seen in Year 1 were eliminated in Year 2. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In a community setting, implementation of second-line OAE screening for CPA referrals reduced referral rates, increased identification of hearing loss, reduced outcome disparities, and improved follow-up rates. This study provides lessons in how to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in early-childhood hearing screening.

Assessment of cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with specific language impairment.

The proper course of speech development heavily influences the cognitive and personal development of children. It is a condition for achieving preschool and school successes - it facilitates socializing and expressing feelings and needs. Impairment of language and its development in children represents a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for physicians and therapists. Early diagnosis of coexisting deficits and starting the therapy influence the therapeutic success. One of the basic diagnostic tests for children suffering from specific language impairment (SLI) is audiometry, thus far referred to as a hearing test. Auditory processing is just as important as a proper hearing threshold. Therefore, diagnosis of central auditory disorder may be a valuable supplementation of diagnosis of language impairment. Early diagnosis and implementation of appropriate treatment may contribute to an effective language therapy.

Audiometric assessment of pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate hearing impairment in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the AudGen database generated by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Audiograms were analyzed for type of hearing loss (HL), pure-tone-average (PTA), laterality, and change in hearing over time. Medical charts were reviewed to identify factors that influence development and progression of hearing loss. RESULTS: 217 patients with CF were included in this study. 69 (31.8%) had hearing loss on initial audiogram. Chronic otitis media (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3-4.5, p<0.01), Eustachian tube dysfunction (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.4-5.4, p<0.01), and otorrhea (OR: 6.3, 95% CI: 1.6-24.7, p<0.01) were positive predictors of HL. Children with a diagnosis of diabetes had more decline in hearing over time than those without diabetes (12.4±17.2dB worsening vs. -5.7±9.8dB improvement in PTA, p=0.014). CONCLUSION: This is the largest comprehensive analysis of all types of hearing loss in pediatric patients with CF. Our data suggest that children with more severe sinus disease may be at lower risk for inflammatory middle ear disease and subsequent hearing loss. Patients who develop complications of CF such as diabetes should be monitored frequently, and the use of ototoxic drugs should be limited if possible.

Considerations for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients With Unilateral or Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Assessment, Device Fitting, and Habilitation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical report is to present case studies of children who are nontraditional candidates for cochlear implantation because they have significant residual hearing in 1 ear and to describe outcomes and considerations for their audiological management and habilitation. METHOD: Case information is presented for 5 children with profound hearing loss in 1 ear and normal or mild-to-moderate hearing loss in the opposite ear and who have undergone unilateral cochlear implantation. Pre- and postoperative assessments were performed per typical clinic routines with modifications described. Postimplant habilitation was customized for each recipient using a combination of traditional methods, newer technologies, and commercial materials. RESULTS: The 5 children included in this report are consistent users of their cochlear implants and demonstrate speech recognition in the implanted ear when isolated from the better hearing ear. CONCLUSIONS: Candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation are evolving. Children with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss who have traditionally not been considered candidates for cochlear implantation should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Audiological management of these recipients is not vastly different compared with children who are traditional cochlear implant recipients. Assessment and habilitation techniques must be modified to isolate the implanted ear to obtain accurate results and to provide meaningful therapeutic intervention.

Implementation of uHear™--an iOS-based application to screen for hearing loss--in older patients with cancer undergoing a comprehensive geriatric assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Validation of uHear™ as a screening tool to detect hearing loss in older patients with cancer without a known diagnosis of presbycusis, as part of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (≥70 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer, were enrolled at the time of CGA screening. Patients were evaluated by uHear™, which was compared to conventional audiometry as gold standard. We defined a pure-tone average (PTA) of ≥40dB HL as the pass or fail screening cut-off. Validation of uHear™ was defined in terms of diagnostic accuracy through Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC)-analysis. To accept uHear™, we estimated that the Area Under the ROC-curve (AUC) had to differ significantly from 0.50 with an AUC of at least 0.70. The Whispered Voice Test and Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly were also administered. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients consented for participation. In one patient, the results of one ear were excluded from the analysis as the patient was documented with a known hearing disorder in that ear. Significant hearing loss, defined by a PTA of ≥40dB HL calculated from the air conduction thresholds at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0kHz, was found in 15.4% of tested ears. uHear™ showed excellent diagnostic accuracy with an AUC±SE of 0.98±0.14. It provided maximum sensitivity (100.0%) but poor specificity (36.4%) at our predefined cut-off score of ≥40dB HL. CONCLUSION: uHear™ can be implemented as a screening tool to detect hearing loss in older patients with cancer within a CGA.

Initial assessment of hearing loss using a mobile application for audiological evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare an Apple iOS mobile operating system application for audiological evaluation with conventional audiometry, and to determine its accuracy and reliability in the initial evaluation of hearing loss. METHODS: The study comprised 32 patients (16 females) diagnosed with hearing loss. The patients were first evaluated with conventional audiometry and the degree of hearing loss was recorded. Then they underwent a smartphone-based hearing test and the data were compared using Cohen's kappa analysis. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 53.59 ± 18.01 years (range, 19-85 years). The mobile phone audiometry results for 39 of the 64 ears were fully compatible with the conventional audiometry results. There was a statistically significant concordant relationship between the two sets of audiometry results (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ear Trumpet version 1.0.2 is a compact and simple mobile application on the Apple iPhone 5 that can measure hearing loss with reliable results.

Accuracy of Remote Hearing Assessment in a Rural Community.

BACKGROUND: This study determined the accuracy of pure tone air conduction (AC) thresholds obtained using a synchronous telemedicine approach without a sound booth in a rural South African community. The global need for increased hearing healthcare currently far exceeds the capacity for delivering these services, especially in developing countries. A tele-audiology approach using a portable diagnostic audiometer could provide the solution, enabling hearing assessments to be conducted remotely and without a sound booth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hearing thresholds in a sound booth and natural environment were obtained from an initial sample of 20 adults (age range, 19-63 years; mean age, 50±13 years; 55% female), recruited from a rural agricultural community. A subgroup of 10 adults (20 ears) volunteered for the telemedicine threshold testing. AC thresholds (250-8,000 Hz) were determined and subsequently compared in these environments. Typical threshold variability was determined using test-retest correspondence as a reference for the threshold correspondence using a telemedicine mode. RESULTS: Test-retest threshold correspondence in the booth and natural environments was within±5 dB in 96.7% and 97.5% of comparisons, respectively. No significant differences were obtained in AC hearing thresholds determined in the telemedicine configuration compared with those recorded in the gold standard booth environment. Threshold correspondence between the telemedicine compared with booth and natural environments were within±5 dB in 82% and 85% of comparisons, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates the validity of using synchronous telemedicine for conducting hearing assessments in a remote rural agricultural community without a sound booth.

Assessment of nasal-noise masking audiometry as a diagnostic test for patulous Eustachian tube.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to assess the validity of nasal-noise masking audiometry (NNMA) as a clinical diagnostic tool in our patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary ambulatory referral center. PATIENTS: Patients with patulous Eustachian tube (PET) were identified from referrals to our Eustachian tube disorders clinic primarily with symptoms including autophony, aural fullness, and hearing their own breathing. The healthy subjects had no history of ear disease. INTERVENTION: NNMA was measured in 20 ears of 10 healthy subjects as well as in 42 ears of 21 patients with suspected PET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: NNMA mean auditory thresholds were measured at frequencies ranging from 250 to 8,000 Hz. RESULTS: When stratified as definitive or probable PET based on observed tympanic membrane movement with breathing, both Definitive and Probable PET groups had significantly higher NNMA mean auditory thresholds compared to Normal ears at 250 Hz (p = 0.001, p = 0.003), 1,000 Hz (p = 0.019, p = 0.001), and 6,000 Hz (p = 0.4, p = 0.001). When stratified based on symptoms on the day of testing, both Symptomatic Ears and Non-Symptomatic Ears had significantly higher mean auditory thresholds compared to Normal ears at 250 Hz (p = 0.001, p = 0.015) and at 1,000 Hz (p = 0.002, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a larger masking effect in patients with PET compared to normal subjects in the low-frequency region. In clinical practice, the relatively small effect and the wide variability of results between patients have made this test be of little value clinically in our patient population.