RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We provide new viewpoints of hormonal control of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The latest treatment findings with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) finasteride and dutasteride, refined indications, efficacy, and safety are discussed and compared. We also discuss potential new 5-ARIs and other hormonal treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: Finasteride and dutasteride have equal efficacy and safety for the treatment and prevention of progression of BPH. 5-ARIs are especially recommended for prostates greater than 40âml and PSA greater than 1.5âng/ml. Combination therapy is the treatment of choice in these patients, but with prostate volume greater than 58âml or International Prostate Symptom Score of at least 20, combinations have no advantage over 5-ARI monotherapy. Updates on the recent developments on BPH therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist are also reviewed and analyzed. Preclinical studies suggest that growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) antagonists effectively shrink experimentally enlarged prostates alone or in combination with LHRH antagonists. SUMMARY: New 5-ARIs seem to be the promising agents that need further study. Preclinical studies revealed that GHRH and LHRH antagonists both can cause a reduction in prostate volume. Recent data indicate that prostate shrinkage is induced by the direct inhibitory action of GHRH and of LHRH antagonists exerted through prostatic receptors. The adverse effects of 5ARIs encourage alternative therapy.
Assuntos
Inibidores de 5-alfa Redutase/uso terapêutico , Azasteroides/uso terapêutico , Finasterida/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de 5-alfa Redutase/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de 5-alfa Redutase/economia , Azasteroides/efeitos adversos , Azasteroides/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dutasterida , Finasterida/efeitos adversos , Finasterida/economia , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Hormônio Liberador de Hormônio do Crescimento/antagonistas & inibidores , Humanos , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/economia , Hiperplasia Prostática/patologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The high disease prevalence, the presentation in older age, a frequently slowly progressing course of disease, and high costs make the diagnosis of and therapy for prostate cancer a special challenge for urologists. Effective prevention of the disease may help to improve some of the problems mentioned above. Two randomised, controlled studies have proved that effective chemoprevention of prostate cancer is viable using 5α-reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride). Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that other compounds, e. g., selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), NSAIDs and statins might also be effective. This review investigates potential risks and benefits of chemoprevention including a consideration of health economical aspects. The authors conclude that the options of chemoprevention should be investigated in an open and unbiased way.
Assuntos
3-Oxo-5-alfa-Esteroide 4-Desidrogenase/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/prevenção & controle , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/uso terapêutico , 3-Oxo-5-alfa-Esteroide 4-Desidrogenase/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Azasteroides/efeitos adversos , Azasteroides/uso terapêutico , Redução de Custos , Dutasterida , Finasterida/efeitos adversos , Finasterida/uso terapêutico , Alemanha , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/efeitos adversosRESUMO
When prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing was introduced, proponents expected it to cut prostate-cancer mortality and did not expect it to unleash an epidemic of unnecessary treatments. Now that evidence of a mortality benefit remains unclear while evidence of overtreatment in undeniable, there is understandable interest in reducing the human costs of the PSA system. Two related drugs, finasteride and dutasteride, both proven to reduce the incidence of prostate cancer and the "risk of diagnosis," are being promoted accordingly. However, if not for the flaws of the PSA system the use of these drugs for purposes of prevention would lose its rationale. Not only are the drugs in this sense dependent on a faulty system, but their own mortality benefits are as speculative as PSA's-in addition to which, they introduce new risks.