Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(9): 2283-2290, 2023 09 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37492974

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is not well known how reliably clinicians order reflex urinalysis to microscopy and culture (rUA-cx) for outpatient urinary tract infection (UTI) workup. Antibiotic appropriateness cannot be fully appreciated until the prevalence of UTIs and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) are realized. OBJECTIVE: This quality improvement study has two major aims, first to determine UTI symptom accuracy for rUA-cx ordering and second, to confirm UTI and ASB cases by integrating rUA-cx and cascaded urinalysis results. Antibiotic utilization and diagnostic coding were secondarily linked to UTIs and ASB. METHODS: An electronic best-practice alert informed the ordering of two rUA-cx options: symptomatic- rUA-cx specifically for dysuria, frequency, urgency, costovertebral pain, suprapubic pain or fever versus non-specific-rUA-cx for vague complaints. UTI symptoms were verified by chart review. Confirmed UTI was defined as a significant culture with UTI symptoms and ASB as a significant culture without UTI symptoms. RESULTS: rUA-cx (2065) were prospectively collected over 6 months from female patients at risk for uncomplicated UTIs. Symptomatic-rUA-cx and non-specific-rUA-cx were associated with UTI symptoms for 53% (809/1527) and 20% (107/538), respectively. Overall, 44% (916/2065) of all rUA-cx had UTI symptoms. rUA-cx were overordered by a factor of 9 (2065/225) for every confirmed UTI. The UTI-to-ASB relative ratio was 2.6 (225/86). Regarding UTI-relevant antibiotics, 39% (214/553) were appropriately associated with UTI whereas only 22% (74/339) of inappropriate antibiotics were captured by the ASB definition, underestimating the problem 4-fold. CONCLUSIONS: UTI and ASB remain challenging to categorize despite a meticulous method that applied acceptable criteria.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriúria , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Feminino , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Urinálise/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Reflexo , Dor/complicações , Dor/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Am J Med ; 135(8): e236-e244, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35367448

RESUMO

Asymptomatic bacteriuria is a common clinical condition that often leads to unnecessary treatment. It has been shown that incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria increases with age and are more prominent in women than men. In older women, the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria is recorded to be more than 15%. This number increased up to 50% for those who reside in long-term care facilities. In most scenarios, asymptomatic bacteriuria does not lead to urinary tract infections, and therefore, antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria has not been shown to improve patient outcomes. In 2019, the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) updated its asymptomatic bacteriuria management guidelines, which emphasized on the risks and benefits of treating the condition. Women who are pregnant should be screened for asymptomatic bacteriuria in the first trimester and treated, if positive. Individuals who are undergoing endoscopic urologic procedures should be screened and treated appropriately for asymptomatic bacteriuria as well. Treating asymptomatic bacteriuria in individuals with diabetes, neutropenia, spinal cord injuries, indwelling urinary catheters, and so on has not been found to improve clinical outcomes. Furthermore, unnecessary treatment is often associated with unwanted consequences including but not limited to increased antimicrobial resistance, Clostridioides difficile infection, and increased health care cost. As a result, multiple antibiotic stewardship programs around the US have implemented protocols to appropriately reduce unnecessary treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. It is important to appropriately screen and treat asymptomatic bacteriuria only when there is evidence of potential benefit.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriúria , Infecções Urinárias , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Prevalência , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia
3.
JCI Insight ; 6(19)2021 10 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473649

RESUMO

BACKGROUNDCatheterization facilitates continuous bacteriuria, for which the clinical significance remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the clinical presentation, epidemiology, and dynamics of bacteriuria in a cohort of long-term catheterized nursing home residents.METHODSProspective urine culture, urinalysis, chart review, and assessment of signs and symptoms of infection were performed weekly for 19 study participants over 7 months. All bacteria ≥ 1 × 103 cfu/mL were cultured, isolated, identified, and tested for susceptibility to select antimicrobials.RESULTSIn total, 226 of the 234 urine samples were polymicrobial (97%), with an average of 4.7 isolates per weekly specimen. A total of 228 urine samples (97%) exhibited ≥ 1 × 106 CFU/mL, 220 (94%) exhibited abnormal urinalysis, 126 (54%) were associated with at least 1 possible sign or symptom of infection, and 82 (35%) would potentially meet a standardized definition of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), but only 3 had a caregiver diagnosis of CAUTI. Bacterial isolates (286; 30%) were resistant to a tested antimicrobial agent, and bacteriuria composition was remarkably stable despite a combined total of 54 catheter changes and 23 weeks of antimicrobial use.CONCLUSIONBacteriuria composition was largely polymicrobial, including persistent colonization by organisms previously considered to be urine culture contaminants. Neither antimicrobial use nor catheter changes sterilized the urine, at most resulting in transient reductions in bacterial burden followed by new acquisition of resistant isolates. Thus, this patient population exhibits a high prevalence of bacteriuria coupled with potential indicators of infection, necessitating further exploration to identify sensitive markers of true infection.FUNDINGThis work was supported by the NIH (R00 DK105205, R01 DK123158, UL1 TR001412).


Assuntos
Infecções Assintomáticas/epidemiologia , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Casas de Saúde , Cateteres Urinários , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriúria/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Cateteres de Demora , Coinfecção/microbiologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
West Afr J Med ; 38(5): 428-433, 2021 May 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051713

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract symptoms are common in pregnancy; thus, symptom-based diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) might not be accurate. Such women are often exposed to antibiotics without urine culture and antibiotics sensitivity. Identification of pyuria on urine microscopy of pregnant women with urinary tract symptoms may predict significant bacteriuria and guide such women's treatment in under-resourced settings. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 233 consecutive consenting pregnant women with UTI symptoms at theantenatal clinic of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital ItukuOzalla, Nigeria. Participants' mid-stream urine specimens were sent for microscopy, culture, and antibiotics sensitivity. Data analysis was descriptive and inferential at 95% confidence level. RESULTS: The prevalence of symptomatic UTI among pregnant women with urinary tract symptoms was 33.5% (78/233). Coliform bacilli were the most common isolates (82.0%) from participants' urine. Ceftriaxone and ampicillin-cloxacillin had the highest (76.9%) and least (12.8%) sensitivity, respectively. Using urine culture as the standard, pyuria on microscopy showed a sensitivity of 43.6% and a specificity of 93.5% for predicting symptomatic UTI. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of UTI among pregnant women with urinary tract symptoms was low, and the most common isolate was coliform bacilli. Though pyuria had reasonably good accuracy for diagnosing symptomatic UTI, it should not be used for this purpose because of the risks associated with misdiagnosis.


CONTEXTE: Les symptômes des voies urinaires sont fréquents pendant la grossesse; ainsi, le diagnostic basé sur les symptômes de l'infection des voies urinaires (IVU) pourrait ne pas être exact. Ces femmes sont souvent exposées à des antibiotiques sans culture d'urine ni sensibilité aux antibiotiques. L'identification de la pyurie par microscopie urinaire chez les femmes enceintes présentant des symptômes des voies urinaires peut prédire une bactériurie importante et orienter le traitement de ces femmes dans les milieux défavorisés. BUT: Déterminer la prévalence des infections urinaires chez les femmes enceintes présentant des symptômes des voies urinaires et évaluer l'exactitude de la pyurie pour prédire les infections urinaires symptomatiques pendant la grossesse à Enugu, au Nigéria. MÉTHODES: Une étude transversale de 233 femmes enceintes consentantes consécutives présentant des symptômes d'infection urinaire à la clinique prénatale de l'hôpital universitaire d'Ituku, à Ozalla, au Nigéria. Les échantillons d'urine à mi-parcours des participants ont été envoyés pour microscopie, culture et sensibilité aux antibiotiques. L'analyse des données était descriptive et inférentielle à un niveau de confiance de 95. RÉSULTATS: La prévalence des infections urinaires symptomatiques chez les femmes enceintes présentant des symptômes des voies urinaires était de 33,5% (78/233). Les bacilles coliformes étaient les isolats les plus courants (82,0%) des urines des participants. La ceftriaxone et l'ampicilline-cloxacilline avaient respectivement la sensibilité la plus élevée (76,9%) et la moins élevée (12,8%). En utilisant la culture d'urine comme norme, la pyurie à la microscopie a montré une sensibilité de 43,6% et une spécificité de 93,5% pour prédire les infections urinaires symptomatiques. CONCLUSION: La prévalence des infections urinaires chez les femmes enceintes présentant des symptômes des voies urinaires était faible et l'isolat le plus courant était les bacilles coliformes. Bien que la pyurie ait une précision raisonnablement bonne pour diagnostiquer une infection urinaire symptomatique, elle ne doit pas être utilisée à cette fin en raison des risques associés à un diagnostic erroné. MOTS CLÉS: Grossesse, infection symptomatique des voies urinaires, culture d'urine, microscopie d'urine.


Assuntos
Bacteriúria , Piúria , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Microscopia , Nigéria , Gravidez , Gestantes , Piúria/epidemiologia , Urinálise
5.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ; 2020: 8398537, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32395068

RESUMO

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to describe bacteriuria with regard to the uropathogens found in relation to the frequency of urine culture tests in a contemporary cohort of pregnant Danish women. Methods: A historical cohort study of 24,817 pregnant women registered in the Danish Fetal Medicine Database at Aarhus University Hospital, from 2010 to 2014. Social security numbers were linked to the microbiological database with the registration of 17,233 urine cultures in 8,807 women. Bacteriuria was defined as 1 × 105 CFU/ml, with a maximum of two urinary pathogens. Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) was included with 1 × 104 CFU/ml. Data are presented as numbers and proportions in percent. Logistic regression on predictors are presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORc/ORa) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: 42% had a urine sample culture test at the hospital-the majority only once during pregnancy. 96% of all urine culture tests were negative. The bacteriuria incidence was 5.6%. The most frequent uropathogenic bacteria isolated were Escherichia coli (49%), GBS (29%), and Enterococci (10%). We identified subgroups of women with increased likelihood of bacteriuria during pregnancy: age < 25 years, ORa 1.60 (CI 1.26 to 2.02, p < 0.001); age > 34 years, ORa 1.28 (CI 1.01 to 1.61, p = 0.040); Afro-Caribbean origin, ORa 1.872 (CI 1.13 to 3.07, p = 0.014); Asian origin, ORa 2.07 (CI 1.29 to 3.32, p = 0.002); and mixed ethnicity ORa 2.34 (CI 1.23 to 4.46, p = 0.010). Women delivering preterm were more likely to have an episode of bacteriuria during pregnancy OR 2.05 (CI 1.36 to 3.09, p = 0.001). Conclusions: 96% of urine culture tests in pregnant women are negative. Optimized urine sampling may change this. Escherichia coli and GBS are predominant uropathogens. Younger and elder women, certain ethnical groups, and women delivering preterm seem more likely to have bacteriuria during pregnancy.


Assuntos
Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/urina , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/urina , Infecções Estreptocócicas/urina , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Bacteriúria/microbiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Enterococcus/isolamento & purificação , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Etnicidade , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolamento & purificação , Adulto Jovem
6.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 239, 2020 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32321461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and sterile pyuria (SP) are complexities of UTI whose prevalence are not known in the northern sector of Ghana. Our aim was to determine the occurrence of sterile pyuria and asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women accessing antenatal care at a secondary and tertiary care hospitals in Tamale, northern Ghana. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted by screening 530 pregnant women with no signs of acute urinary tract infection attending antenatal clinic for a period of 6 months. Midstream urine was collected for microscopy, quantitative urine culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Data analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20. RESULTS: Asymptomatic bacteriuria was respectively 20 and 35.5% at Tamale Central and Tamale Teaching Hospital out of the 390 and 90 women screened. Sterile pyuria was found among 66% of the 50 women presenting at Tamale Central Hospital. More than 64% of isolates recovered from ASB patients were S. aureus and coagulase negative Staph. (CoNS). Escherichia coli was the dominant species among members of the enterobacteriaceae isolated. Highest susceptibility was recorded against gentamicin and amikacin while most resistance was to Ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, chloramphenicol and nitrofurantoin. Resistance to imipenem and vancomycin were 28.8 and 52%, with strains showing multiple drug resistance of between 81 and 92%. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria is appreciably higher (20-35.5%) than documented rates in the southern sector of the country. The presence of sterile pyuria which may be an indication of asymptomatic renal impairment and most often overlooked in antenatal management is 66%. Empirical treatment of UTIs at the Tamale Central and Teaching Hospital without confirmation of susceptibility may result in treatment failure. It is necessary to screen and treat pregnant women for ASB and SP due to the complications associated with these conditions.


Assuntos
Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Piúria/epidemiologia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Gana/epidemiologia , Hospitais , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Prevalência , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
7.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 18(5): 453-460, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32212977

RESUMO

Introduction: It is unclear how to prevent the negative impact of inappropriate urine cultures in older acute care patients who have a high rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria.Areas covered: A nonsystematic literature review of the definition, impact, and management of elderly acute care patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB).Expert opinion: In the elderly, patients with ASB include those with extra-urinary tract diseases (e.g. pneumonia) and those with symptoms/signs that resolve without antibiotic therapy, but the diagnosis of ASB is unclear in febrile patients responding to antibiotics. We consider four management strategies that could decrease the negative impact of culturing the urine including unnecessary antibiotic therapy in those with ASB: (1) Prevent urine testing in patients with extra-urinary tract reasons for their acute care (2) Cancel urine cultures if the urine dipstick is negative. (3) Avoid catheterization in stable patients who cannot provide a urine specimen on demand and (4) Withhold antibiotics in stable non-febrile elderly patients who do not have new local urinary tract symptoms or decompensation on follow-up, and pursue further investigations for another etiology/diagnosis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Idoso , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Humanos , Prevalência , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Urinálise/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Urinário
9.
Clin Transplant ; 33(6): e13583, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31038773

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most commonly occurring infectious complication following kidney transplantation. Questions remain regarding whether asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) should be treated. The aim was to evaluate the incidence and management of ASB in kidney transplant recipients at a large academic medical center. METHODS: All subjects receiving an isolated kidney transplant between September 2012 and October 2016, and with at least one ASB episode were included. Demographics, symptomatology, and urine culture data were collected on subjects with bacteriuria in the first year post-transplant. Cultures were classified by symptoms, ASB treatment trends were analyzed, and ASB-to-UTI progression was compared between ASB treatment and non-treatment. RESULTS: A total of 527 subjects were transplanted with 64 developing at least one ASB episode. The incidence of ASB was 12.1% and treated 74.6% of the time. Neither lack of ASB treatment (P = 0.463) nor ASB within the first month post-transplant (P = 0.303) were associated with ASB-to-UTI progression. CONCLUSION: Despite high ASB treatment rate, this was not found to be protective against ASB-to-UTI progression. ASB within the first month post-transplant also did not correlate with increased progression risk. These results suggest minimization of ASB treatment in kidney transplant recipients remains an important antimicrobial stewardship target.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Bacteriúria/complicações , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Urinálise , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/patologia
10.
Urologe A ; 58(9): 1019-1028, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30623216

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that nonadherence to guidelines is pretty common in the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI). However, no urological study has raised the question, what are barriers or reasons for this nonadherence, yet. OBJECTIVES: Consequently, we performed a survey among German urologists with the primary endpoint identification of barriers for nonadherence to German guidelines on UTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 19-item questionnaire was developed and transferred to the online portal "Survey Monkey®" (Private Equity, San Mateo, CA, USA) and tested for usability by our study group. The link for the survey was sent twice to the members of the German Society of Urology (DGU). RESULTS: Overall, 307 questionnaires were completed. The mean age of the study population was 46.7 years (standard deviation 11.5). The majority (34.9%) followed guidelines in 80% of the cases. Main reasons for nonadherence on the physicians' side were 23.4% personal experience and lacking practicality of UTI guidelines on the individual complex patient. On the open questions urologists mostly stated (11.7%) that the main reason on the physician side for nonadherence is ignorance. Therefore they, in open questions, suggest to promote guidelines more in meetings and more designed practically with shortcuts and simple layout. Patient-associated factors mentioned were mostly in 26.7%. Furthermore, German urologists stated that guidelines should also have a patient section, where the main recommendations are explained in plain language. CONCLUSION: We performed the first survey on identifying barriers for nonadherence to guidelines in urology. Despite some limitations, our results are very important for the further design of guidelines. This has the potential to improve guideline adherence.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/terapia , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/terapia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Médicos/psicologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevenção Secundária/normas , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/terapia , Adulto , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Alemanha , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Inquéritos e Questionários , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Urologia/normas
11.
Health Technol Assess ; 22(24): 1-102, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29766842

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People carrying out clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC) to empty their bladder often suffer repeated urinary tract infections (UTIs). Continuous once-daily, low-dose antibiotic treatment (antibiotic prophylaxis) is commonly advised but knowledge of its effectiveness is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit, harms and cost-effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent UTIs in people who perform CISC. DESIGN: Parallel-group, open-label, patient-randomised 12-month trial of allocated intervention with 3-monthly follow-up. Outcome assessors were blind to allocation. SETTING: UK NHS, with recruitment of patients from 51 sites. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and four adults performing CISC and predicted to continue for ≥ 12 months who had suffered at least two UTIs in the previous year or had been hospitalised for a UTI in the previous year. INTERVENTIONS: A central randomisation system using random block allocation set by an independent statistician allocated participants to the experimental group [once-daily oral antibiotic prophylaxis using either 50 mg of nitrofurantoin, 100 mg of trimethoprim (Kent Pharmaceuticals, Ashford, UK) or 250 mg of cefalexin (Sandoz Ltd, Holzkirchen, Germany); n = 203] or the control group of no prophylaxis (n = 201), both for 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary clinical outcome was relative frequency of symptomatic, antibiotic-treated UTI. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by cost per UTI avoided. The secondary measures were microbiologically proven UTI, antimicrobial resistance, health status and participants' attitudes to antibiotic use. RESULTS: The frequency of symptomatic antibiotic-treated UTI was reduced by 48% using prophylaxis [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.61; n = 361]. Reduction in microbiologically proven UTI was similar (IRR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.60; n = 361). Absolute reduction in UTI episodes over 12 months was from a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1-4) in the no-prophylaxis group (n = 180) to 1 (0-2) in the prophylaxis group (n = 181). The results were unchanged by adjustment for days at risk of UTI and the presence of factors giving higher risk of UTI. Development of antimicrobial resistance was seen more frequently in pathogens isolated from urine and Escherichia coli from perianal swabs in participants allocated to antibiotic prophylaxis. The use of prophylaxis incurred an extra cost of £99 to prevent one UTI (not including costs related to increased antimicrobial resistance). The emotional and practical burden of CISC and UTI influenced well-being, but health status measured over 12 months was similar between groups and did not deteriorate significantly during UTI. Participants were generally unconcerned about using antibiotics, including the possible development of antimicrobial resistance. LIMITATIONS: Lack of blinding may have led participants in each group to use different thresholds to trigger reporting and treatment-seeking for UTI. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large randomised trial, conducted in accordance with best practice, demonstrate clear benefit for antibiotic prophylaxis in terms of reducing the frequency of UTI for people carrying out CISC. Antibiotic prophylaxis use appears safe for individuals over 12 months, but the emergence of resistant urinary pathogens may prejudice longer-term management of recurrent UTI and is a public health concern. Future work includes longer-term studies of antimicrobial resistance and studies of non-antibiotic preventative strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67145101 and EudraCT 2013-002556-32. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment Vol. 22, No. 24. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Cateterismo Urinário/métodos , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Nitrofurantoína/economia , Nitrofurantoína/uso terapêutico , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Autocuidado , Método Simples-Cego , Medicina Estatal , Trimetoprima/economia , Trimetoprima/uso terapêutico , Reino Unido , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
12.
Med Mal Infect ; 47(8): 519-525, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28869102

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: A quality improvement program for adult urinary tract infection management was established to avoid unnecessary antibiotic treatment and to promote adequate prescription, associated with financial and time savings. METHODS: Management was integrated into a three-step approach: clinical diagnosis, bacteriological diagnosis, and therapeutic decision. For each step, areas for improvement were prioritized and implemented through corrective measures and key messages, measured by indicators. This program was applied to the whole hospital, which includes an emergency department and hospital units (672 beds). RESULTS: The diffusion of new recommendations on clinical diagnosis helped limit the use of Urine Dipstick Tests (UDT) and identify situations requiring the prescription of urine cytobacteriological test (UCBE) and antibiotic treatment: decreased annual consumption of UDTs (34%) and UCBEs (25%). The implementation of a new sampling system for UCBEs was associated with a 21% increase in conclusive analysis. Results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing were also optimized. Trainings on the proper use of antibiotics led to a 5.0% decline in global consumption. Only 23 antibiotic prescriptions for UTI resulted in pharmaceutical advice to prescribers in 2014. CONCLUSION: The program is part of a practice improvement strategy. Integrating the management of urinary tract infections into a global process helped improve each step of patient management.


Assuntos
Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/normas , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Redução de Custos , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Uso de Medicamentos , França/epidemiologia , Hospitais Gerais/organização & administração , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fitas Reagentes , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia
13.
Urologe A ; 56(6): 746-758, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28455578

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Update of the 2010 published evidence-based S3 guideline on epidemiology, diagnostics, therapy and management of uncomplicated, bacterial, outpatient-acquired urinary tract infections in adult patients. The guideline contains current evidence for the rational use of antimicrobial substances, avoidance of inappropriate use of certain antibiotic classes and development of resistance. METHODOLOGY: The update was created under the leadership of the German Association of Urology (DGU). A systematic literature search was conducted for the period 01 January 2008 to 31 December 2015. International guidelines have also been taken into account. Evidence level and risk of bias were used for quality review. RESULTS: Updated information on bacterial susceptibility, success, collateral damage and safety of first- and second-line antibiotics was given. For the treatment of uncomplicated cystitis the first line antibiotics are fosfomycin trometamol, nitrofurantoin, nitroxoline, pivmecillinam, trimethoprim (with consideration of the local resistance rates). Fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins should not be used as first choice antibiotics. In the case of uncomplicated pyelonephritis of mild to moderate forms, preferably cefpodoxime, ceftibuten, ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin should be used as oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The updated German S3 guideline provides comprehensive evidence- and consensus-based recommendations on epidemiology, diagnostics, therapy, prevention and management of uncomplicated bacterial outpatient acquired urinary tract infections in adult patients. Antibiotic stewardship aspects have significantly influenced the therapeutic recommendations. A broad implementation in all clinical practice settings is necessary to ensure a foresighted antibiotic policy and thus t improve clinical care.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Bacteriúria/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevenção Secundária/normas , Alergia e Imunologia/normas , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Alemanha , Humanos , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Terapêutica , Urologia/normas
14.
Urology ; 99: 100-105, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27773650

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether it is always necessary to test for the presence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) in patients undergoing urologic surgical procedures, and if present, whether to treat AB with antimicrobial prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent urologic surgical procedures from December 2008 to October 2013 in a tertiary referral urologic center were considered for this study. All patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis in line with European Association of Urology guidelines on urologic infections. AB was diagnosed if ≥105 colony-forming units/mL were cultured. The population was subdivided into 2 groups: group A, patients with preoperative AB, and group B, patients without AB. Data on postoperative symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) were compared for the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 2201 patients were considered eligible for this study and were analyzed; 668 (30.4%) patients were found to harbor AB (group A), and 1533 (69.6%) patients did not have AB (group B). Microbiologically verified symptomatic postoperative UTIs occurred in 198 patients (8.9%). No difference in terms of overall rate of postoperative symptomatic UTI was found between the 2 groups (group A: 70 [10.4%] and group B: 128 [8.3%]; OR: 1.28 95%CI 0.94-1.74; P = .12), as well as in terms of urosepsis (group A: 2 [0.30%] and group B: 4 [0.26%]; P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing urologic surgical procedures who are receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis in accordance with European Association of Urology guidelines, the preoperative presence of AB in this study was not associated with a higher incidence of postoperative symptomatic UTI.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Bacteriúria/etiologia , Bacteriúria/terapia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
17.
Spinal Cord ; 51(1): 70-3, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22964752

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Non-interventional, descriptive-observational cohorts study. OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) after urodynamic examination in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) according to bladder management. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. METHODS: Between January and December 2010 a total of 133 consecutive, hospitalized SCI patients were included and classified according to their bladder management. Urine specimen was obtained at the beginning of the urodynamic studies (UDS) and 3-5 days thereafter. 'Significant bacteriuria' (SBU) is defined by a CBU per ml level ≥10(5) in a urine culture. UTI thus is defined as a combination of a SBU and ≥100 leukocytes per µl in urine analysis. RESULTS: The overall incidence of UTI post UDS was 15.79%. In patients with sterile urine prior to urodynamics UTI was ascertained in 8.6% (de-novo-UTI). In contrast, 32.5% of the patients with SBU prior to UDS showed UTI 3 days later. There were only minor differences in the incidence of de-novo-UTIs in SCI patients who emptied their bladder by intermittent self catheterization or intermittent catheterization by attendant (8.82% and 6.67%, respectively). In SCI patients with reflex voiding however, the frequency of de-novo-UTIs was twice as high (14.28%). CONCLUSION: The recommendation of antibiotic prophylaxis for all SCI patients undergoing urodynamic examination is not commonly accepted and according to our data not justified. However, the analysis of subgroups revealed that SCI patients with unsuspected SBU prior to UDS and patients with reflex voiding are possibly at higher risk to acquire post-UDS infection.


Assuntos
Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/fisiopatologia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/fisiopatologia , Urodinâmica/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Bacteriúria/etiologia , Administração de Caso , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reflexo/fisiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Cateterismo Urinário , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Micção/fisiologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
Afr Health Sci ; 11(2): 182-9, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21857848

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women are a common problem in primary health care settings. Resistance of bacterial uropathogens to commonly used antibiotics is common in many places. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of UTI, associated uropathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility. METHODS: A cross section study carried out at Mulago hospital outpatients' department. Midstream urine samples (MSU) were collected from 399 women, who gave informed consent and fulfilled other study criteria. Quantitative culture method, identification of uropathogens and antibiotic susceptibility testing using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique were applied to the isolates. RESULTS: Out of 399 MSU samples, 40 pure significant bacterial growths (≥10(5) colony forming units (cfu)/ml of urine) were isolated and these included Escherichia coli, 23 (57.5%), Staphylococcus aureus, 9 (22.5%), Enterococci spp, 6 (15%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2 (5.0%). Overall, sensitivities were: nitrofurantoin (98.3%), cefuroxime (89.3%), and cotrimoxazole (20%) by all uropathogens isolated. CONCLUSIONS: Culture positive UTI among adult non-pregnant women are a common problem, occurring in 10% of the study population. Most bacterial uropathogens showed high sensitivity to nitrofurantoin but low sensitivity to SXT. RECOMMENDATIONS: Nitrofurantoin should be considered as drug of choice for empirical treatment of community acquired uncomplicated UTI in adult non-pregnant women.


Assuntos
Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Bacteriúria/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Uganda/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
20.
Br J Biomed Sci ; 63(3): 109-12, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17058709

RESUMO

Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy is the major risk factor for developing symptomatic urinary tract infection during pregnancy. In the present study, 300 pregnant women are screened for significant asymptomatic bacteriuria in order to provide an insight into the prevalence in developing countries, reassessment of some predisposing factors and aetiological agents and their susceptibility tests. The mean age of the patients in the study is 26.8 years (SD: 5.8 years, range: 16-40 years). Using 10(3) organisms/mL as a significant level of bacteriuria, the prevalence was found to be 21.0%. One hundred and fifty-eight samples had no pus cells, with 25 showing significant bacteriuria, 116 samples contained 1-4 pus cells/high power field (hpf) with 25 showing significant bacteriuria, while 26 samples had > or = 5 pus cells/hpf with 13 showing significant bacteriuria. There was no particular trend associated with age and rate of infection. However, there was a decline in the rate of infection in the 26-30 age group, with a sharp increase as age increased. There was high incidence of bacteriuria during the third trimester of pregnancy (21.9%) compared with that in the first trimester (7.7%), while the level in the second trimester was 22.5%. Multiparity is associated with increased bacteriuria in pregnancy. Thirty-one (49.2%) isolates grew Gram-negative bacilli; 27 (42.9%) grew Gram-positive cocci and the remainder (7.9%) grew yeast-like cells. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent pathogen (41.3%), followed by Klebsiella species (33.3%) and Escherichia coli (11.1%). Bacterial isolates from this study were most sensitive to ceftazidime, followed by ceftriazone, and least susceptible to co-trimoxazole.


Assuntos
Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriúria/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Prevalência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA