Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 102
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(5): 1019-1022, 2024 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38471817

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To calculate a risk-adjusted mortality ratio (RAMR) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) using all-patient refined diagnosis-related groups (APR-DRGs) and compare it with the crude mortality rate (CMR). METHODS: Retrospective observational study of prevalent BSI at our institution from January 2019 to December 2022. In-hospital mortality was adjusted with a binary logistic regression model adjusting for sex, age, admission type and mortality risk for the hospitalization episode according to the four severity levels of APR DRGs. The RAMR was calculated as the ratio of observed to expected in-hospital mortality, and the CMR was calculated as the proportion of deaths among all bacteraemia episodes. RESULTS: Of 2939 BSIs, 2541 were included: Escherichia coli (n = 1310), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 428), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 209), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 498) and candidaemia (n = 96). A total of 436 (17.2%) patients died during hospitalization and 279 died within the first 14 days after the onset of BSI. Throughout the period, all BSI cases had a mortality rate above the expected adjusted mortality (RAMR value greater than 1), except for Escherichia coli (1.03; 95% CI 0.86-1.21). The highest overall RAMR values were observed for P. aeruginosa, Candida and S. aureus with 2.06 (95% CI 1.57-2.62), 1.99 (95% CI 1.3-2.81) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.47-2.16), respectively. The temporal evolution of CMR may differ from RAMR, especially in E. coli, where it was reversed. CONCLUSIONS: RAMR showed higher than expected mortality for all BSIs studied except E. coli and provides complementary to and more clinically comprehensive information than CMR, the currently recommended antibiotic stewardship programme mortality indicator.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Adulto
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(2): e2036518, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33538825

RESUMO

Importance: Infection in neonates remains a substantial problem. Advances for this population are hindered by the absence of a consensus definition for sepsis. In adults, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) operationalizes mortality risk with infection and defines sepsis. The generalizability of the neonatal SOFA (nSOFA) for neonatal late-onset infection-related mortality remains unknown. Objective: To determine the generalizability of the nSOFA for neonatal late-onset infection-related mortality across multiple sites. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 7 academic neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. Participants included 653 preterm (<33 weeks) very low-birth-weight infants. Exposures: Late-onset (>72 hours of life) infection including bacteremia, fungemia, or surgical peritonitis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was late-onset infection episode mortality. The nSOFA scores from survivors and nonsurvivors with confirmed late-onset infection were compared at 9 time points (T) preceding and following event onset. Results: In the 653 infants who met inclusion criteria, median gestational age was 25.5 weeks (interquartile range, 24-27 weeks) and median birth weight was 780 g (interquartile range, 638-960 g). A total of 366 infants (56%) were male. Late-onset infection episode mortality occurred in 97 infants (15%). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for mortality in the total cohort ranged across study centers from 0.71 to 0.95 (T0 hours), 0.77 to 0.96 (T6 hours), and 0.78 to 0.96 (T12 hours), with utility noted at all centers and in aggregate. Using the maximum nSOFA score at T0 or T6, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for mortality was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.91). Analyses stratified by sex or Gram-stain identification of pathogen class or restricted to infants born at less than 25 weeks' completed gestation did not reduce the association of the nSOFA score with infection-related mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: The nSOFA score was associated with late-onset infection mortality in preterm infants at the time of evaluation both in aggregate and in each center. These findings suggest that the nSOFA may serve as the foundation for a consensus definition of sepsis in this population.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Fungemia/mortalidade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/mortalidade , Sepse Neonatal/mortalidade , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Peritonite/mortalidade , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/fisiopatologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/mortalidade , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Fungemia/microbiologia , Fungemia/fisiopatologia , Idade Gestacional , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/fisiopatologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/fisiopatologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Recém-Nascido de Peso Extremamente Baixo ao Nascer , Lactente Extremamente Prematuro , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Recém-Nascido de muito Baixo Peso , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Perfuração Intestinal , Masculino , Sepse Neonatal/fisiopatologia , Peritonite/microbiologia , Peritonite/fisiopatologia , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 916, 2020 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33267829

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (Kp-BSI) is a serious threat to pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to explore the risk factors, validate the prediction efficiency of pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and establish better early predictors of mortality in pediatric patients with Kp-BSI. METHODS: All children diagnosed with Kp-BSI were included in this retrospective cohort study from January 2009 to June 2019. Basic characteristics, symptoms and physical examinations, treatments, laboratory statistics, and SOFA at the onset of Kp-BSI were recorded. The Cox proportional hazard model and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the association between the variables and the 90-day mortality and their predictive value. DeLong's test of receiver operating characteristic curves and integrated discrimination improvement index were used to determine the improvement in predictive capacity of the modified SOFA models. A predictive score was developed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 146 children enrolled, 33 (22.6%) patients died within 90 days. Hospitalization in the last 6 months, intra-abdominal source of infection, presence of organ failure, and altered levels of blood biomarkers, including C-reactive protein, albumin, and lactate were significant risk factors for 90-day mortality. The area under the curve (AUC) of SOFA for predicting 90-day mortality was 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.89). Moreover, we found that a prediction model combining SOFA with two other parameters, namely hospitalization in the last 6 months and intra-abdominal source of infection, was better at predicting mortality (AUC = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96; sensitivity = 0.86; specificity = 0.84). According to this novel risk model, we defined three statistically different groups: low-risk, medium-risk and high-risk groups, with an observed 90-day mortality of 5.4, 35.7, and 72.0%, respectively. With reference to the low-risk patients, the medium-risk and high-risk groups had a higher mortality, with hazard ratios of 8.36 (95% CI 3.60-27.83) and 20.27 (95% CI 7.47-54.95), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The modified SOFA may be better than the original score to predict 90-day mortality in pediatric patients with Kp-BSI. Future prospective studies are required to validate this novel scoring system in external cohorts.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecções por Klebsiella/epidemiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/mortalidade , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Área Sob a Curva , Biomarcadores/sangue , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Masculino , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 545, 2020 Jul 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32711452

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infection is common in the UK and has significant mortality depending on the pathogen involved, site of infection and other patient factors. Healthcare staffing and ward activity may also impact on outcomes in a range of conditions, however there is little specific National Health Service (NHS) data on the impact for patients with bloodstream infection. Bloodstream Infections - Focus on Outcomes is a multicentre cohort study with the primary aim of identifying modifiable risk factors for 28-day mortality in patients with bloodstream infection due to one of six key pathogens. METHODS: Adults under the care of five NHS Trusts in England and Wales between November 2010 and May 2012 were included. Multivariable Cox regression was used to quantify the association between modifiable risk factors, including staffing levels and timing of appropriate therapy, and 28-day mortality, after adjusting for non-modifiable risk factors such as patient demographics and long-term comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 1676 patients were included in the analysis population. Overall, 348/1676 (20.8%) died within 28 days. Modifiable factors associated with 28-day mortality were ward speciality, ward activity (admissions and discharges), movement within ward speciality, movement from critical care, and time to receipt of appropriate antimicrobial therapy in the first 7 days. For each additional admission or discharge per 10 beds, the hazard increased by 4% (95% CI 1 to 6%) in medical wards and 11% (95% CI 4 to 19%) in critical care. Patients who had moved wards within speciality or who had moved out of a critical care ward had a reduction in hazard of mortality. In the first 7 days, hazard of death increased with increasing time to receipt of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the importance of appropriate antimicrobials within the first 7 days, and the potential for ward activity and ward movements to impact on survival in bloodstream infection.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Candidemia/mortalidade , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Medicina Estatal , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , País de Gales/epidemiologia
5.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 39(9): 781-788, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32221163

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the national trends in pediatric severe sepsis in the United States from 2003 to 2014. STUDY DESIGN: For this study, we included nonoverlapping years of Kids Inpatient database and National Inpatient Sample database while including hospitalizations of children between 1 and 20 years of age from more than 4200 hospitals across the United States. We identified patient hospitalizations with severe sepsis using specific ICD codes and modified Angus Criteria. Trend analysis of various factors associated with severe sepsis was calculated using the Cochrane-Armitage test. Associated foci of infection and comorbid conditions were identified using specific ICD codes, and a multivariate regression analysis with death as outcome variable was done to evaluate for in hospital predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Totally, 109,026 episodes of severe sepsis were identified during the study period between 2003 and 2014. Incidence of severe sepsis hospitalizations increased by 2.5 times (0.64-1.57 per 10,000 population) over the study period with notable concurrent significant decrease in mortality by more than 50%. Lower age, African American, Hispanic ethnicity, complex neurologic conditions, infective endocarditis, immunodeficient states including primary immunodeficiency disorder, HIV, burns, malignancy and transplant status are associated with mortality. There is a significant increase in use of healthcare resources (P < 0.001) with mean charges of 94,966$ despite a notable decrease in mean length of stay (22 vs. 16 days, P < 0.001) over the study period. CONCLUSION: Incidence of pediatric severe sepsis is high leading to a significant use of healthcare resources. This study provides a detailed analysis of associated inpatient factors and comorbidities associated with mortality.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , População , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Adolescente , Bacteriemia/economia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/patogenicidade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/economia , Sepse/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 140(2): 319-328, 2020.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32009051

RESUMO

In this study, antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) intervention was evaluated by comparing patient outcomes and consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics [carbapenem antibiotics and tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC)] before and after the intervention. There was no fluctuation in the consumption rate of carbapenem, TAZ/PIPC and other antibiotics, but there was a decreased annual consumption of antibiotics after AST intervention compared to before intervention. For the carbapenems, antimicrobial use density (AUD) of meropenem (MEPM) was highest in both periods, at 20.1 and 20.4 before and after AST intervention, respectively, with no significant change after AST intervention. However, the days of therapy (DOT) for MEPM were 27.4 and 24.8 d, respectively, with a decreasing trend after AST intervention. AUD and DOT for TAZ/PIPC after AST intervention were 6.5 and 8.1 d, respectively, which were lower than the pre-intervention values. Rapid identification of the causative strain enables early de-escalation and may improve the economics of antibiotic use, but there was no difference from before to after AST intervention. Compared with before and after strain identification, the carbapenem administration rate after AST intervention was significantly lower than the pre-intervention rate (p<0.01). There was no difference in 28-day mortality and treatment period before and after AST intervention, and there were no differences in outcomes such as resolution of bacteremia, mortality, exacerbation and no change from before to after AST intervention. Based on these results, we suggest that AST intervention can reduce consumption of antibiotics without altering patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Infect Dis Health ; 25(3): 151-157, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32005586

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score predicts mortality in patients with suspected infection. We sought to understand how well qSOFA and the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria predict gram negative bacteraemia. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 99 patients with gram negative bloodstream infection from a single tertiary centre. We assessed the utility of SIRS and qSOFA for their rate of positivity and association with early delivery of antibiotics (<3 h). RESULTS: The SIRS criteria had the highest positivity rate amongst patients with gram negative bacteraemia (85%) compared to the qSOFA criteria (25%) on the day of first positive culture. Positive SIRS criteria was the only score associated with delivery of antibiotics within 3 h (Relative risk 3.5, 95% Confidence interval 1.3 to 12.5, p = < 0.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with gram negative bloodstream infection SIRS criteria was the most common positive risk score and had a higher association with early delivery of antibiotics when compared to qSOFA.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/complicações , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/complicações , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Queensland , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/complicações , Adulto Jovem
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(3): 342-354, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31898557

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the attributable mortality, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare cost of pediatric and neonatal healthcare-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs). DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search (January 2000-September 2018) was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases. Reference lists of selected articles were screened to identify additional studies. Case-control or cohort studies were eligible for inclusion when full text was available in English and data for at least 1 of the following criteria were provided: attributable or excess LOS, healthcare cost, or mortality rate due to HA-BSI. Study quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool (CASP). Study selection and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent researchers, and a third researcher was consulted to resolve any disagreements. Fixed- or random-effect models, as appropriate, were used to synthesize data. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 21 studies were included in the systematic review and 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Attributable mean LOS ranged between 4 and 27.8 days; healthcare cost ranged between $1,642.16 and $160,804 (2019 USD) per patient with HA-BSI; and mortality rate ranged between 1.43% and 24%. The pooled mean attributable hospital LOS was 16.91 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.70-20.11) and the pooled attributable mortality rate was 8% (95% CI, 6-9). A meta-analysis was not conducted for cost due to lack of eligible studies. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric HA-BSIs have a significant impact on mortality, LOS, and healthcare cost, further highlighting the need for implementation of HA-BSI prevention strategies.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecção Hospitalar , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Sepse , Adulto , Bacteriemia/economia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sepse/economia , Sepse/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
9.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 55(2): 105849, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31770628

RESUMO

In 2010, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) lowered carbapenem breakpoints to reduce the proportion of 'susceptible' organisms that produced carbapenemases. Few studies have evaluated the effect of this change on clinical outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of carbapenem MICs on 30-day mortality from pooled patient-level data from studies of patients treated with carbapenems across a range of meropenem MICs. PubMed was searched to March 2019 with the terms 'carbapenem', 'meropenem', 'imipenem', 'doripenem', 'ertapenem', 'susceptibility' and 'outcomes'. Studies were included in the analysis if patients had Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia treated with a carbapenem for ≥48 h and mortality was reported. Studies were excluded if all isolates were either susceptible or resistant to meropenem based on CLSI 2010 breakpoints or if only carbapenemase-producing isolates were included. Authors were contacted for patient-level data. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, with planned subset analyses of patients treated with meropenem, receiving active combination therapy, treated in the ICU or infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae. Of 157 articles identified, 4 met the inclusion criteria (115 eligible patients). The odds of mortality increased with each increasing meropenem MIC dilution (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.06-2.15) as a continuous variable. A similar increase in odds was observed in patients treated with meropenem, treated in the ICU, infected with K. pneumoniae or receiving no other active antimicrobials. Increasing meropenem MICs in Enterobacteriaceae were associated with increased mortality; however, more work is needed to define optimal clinical decision rules for infections within the susceptible range.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidade , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Humanos , Meropeném/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
10.
Acta Med Port ; 32(12): 737-745, 2019 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851882

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The ideal biomarker to assess response and prognostic assessment in the infected critically ill patient is still not available. The aims of our study were to analyze the association between early C-reactive protein kinetics and duration and appropriateness of antibiotic therapy and its usefulness in predicting mortality in infected critically ill patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have carried out an observational retrospective study in a cohort of 60 patients with community-acquired pneumonia, aspiration pneumonia and bacteremia at an intensive care unit. We have collected C-reactive protein consecutive serum levels for eight days as well as duration and appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy. C-reactive protein kinetic groups were defined based on the levels at days 0, 4 and 7. With a follow-up of one year, we have evaluated mortality at different time-points. RESULTS: We have obtained three different C-reactive protein kinetic groups from the sample: fast response, delayed but fast response and delayed and slow response. We did not find statistically significant associations between C-reactive protein kinetics and early (intensive care unit, hospital and 28-days) or late (six months and one year) mortality and antibiotic therapy duration (p > 0.05). Although there were no statistically significant differences between the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy and the defined groups (p = 0.265), no patient with inappropriate antibiotic therapy presented a fast response pattern. DISCUSSION: Several studies suggest the importance of this protein in infection. CONCLUSION: Early C-reactive protein kinetics is not associated with response and prognostic assessment in infected critically ill patients. Nevertheless, a fast response pattern tends to exclude initial inappropriate antibiotic therapy.


Introdução: O biomarcador ideal capaz de avaliar a resposta e prognóstico no doente crítico infetado ainda não está disponível. Os objetivos do nosso estudo foram avaliar a relação da cinética precoce da proteína C-reativa com a duração e apropriação da terapêutica antibiótica e a sua utilidade na predição de mortalidade. Material e Métodos: Realizámos um estudo retrospetivo observacional numa coorte de 60 doentes com pneumonia adquirida na comunidade, pneumonia de aspiração e bacteremia numa unidade de cuidados intensivos. Colhemos níveis séricos de proteína C-reativa durante oito dias e a duração e apropriação da terapêutica antibiótica inicial. Definimos grupos de cinética de proteína C-reativa com base nos níveis dos dias 0, 4 e 7. Durante um ano de seguimento, analisámos a mortalidade em diferentes momentos. Resultados: Da amostra obtivemos três grupos de cinética de proteína C-reativa: resposta rápida, resposta atrasada mas rápida e resposta atrasada e lenta. Não observamos associação estatisticamente significativa entre a cinética da proteína C-reativa com a mortalidade precoce (unidade de cuidados intensivos, hospital e aos 28 dias) ou tardia (seis meses e um ano) e duração da terapêutica antibiótica (p > 0,05). Embora não existam diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre a apropriação da terapêutica antibiótica e os grupos definidos (p = 0,265), nenhum doente com terapêutica antibiótica inapropriada apresentou um padrão de resposta rápida. Discussão: Vários estudos sugerem a importância desta proteína na infeção. Conclusão: A cinética precoce da proteína C-reativa não está associada com a avaliação da resposta e prognóstico no doente crítico infectado. Porém, um padrão de resposta rápida tende a excluir terapêutica antibiótica inicial inapropriada.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/sangue , Pneumonia Aspirativa/sangue , Idoso , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Biomarcadores , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/mortalidade , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Aspirativa/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Aspirativa/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
11.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 11245, 2019 08 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375759

RESUMO

Invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) is among the leading causes of blood stream infections in sub-Saharan Africa and other developing regions, especially among pediatric populations. Invasive NTS can be difficult to treat and have high case-fatality rates, in part due to emergence of strains resistant to broad-spectrum antibiotics. Furthermore, improper treatment contributes to increased antibiotic resistance and death. Point of care (POC) diagnostic tests that rapidly identify invasive NTS infection, and differentiate between resistant and non-resistant strains, may greatly improve patient outcomes and decrease resistance at the community level. Here we present for the first time a model for NTS dynamics in high risk populations that can analyze the potential advantages and disadvantages of four strategies involving POC diagnostic deployment, and the resulting impact on antimicrobial treatment for patients. Our analysis strongly supports the use of POC diagnostics coupled with targeted antibiotic use for patients upon arrival in the clinic for optimal patient and public health outcomes. We show that even the use of imperfect POC diagnostics can significantly reduce total costs and number of deaths, provided that the diagnostic gives results quickly enough that patients are likely to return or stay to receive targeted treatment.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Surtos de Doenças/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/economia , Infecções por Salmonella/diagnóstico , África Subsaariana/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Criança , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/economia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/instrumentação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Salmonella/efeitos dos fármacos , Salmonella/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Salmonella/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Salmonella/microbiologia , Infecções por Salmonella/mortalidade
12.
BMJ Open ; 9(7): e028856, 2019 07 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31300504

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the validity of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score for mortality and bacteraemia risk assessment in Japanese haemodialysis patients. DESIGN: This is a retrospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING: The six participating hospitals are tertiary-care institutions that receive patients on an emergency basis and provide primary, secondary and tertiary care. The other participating hospital is a secondary-care institution that receives patients on an emergency basis and provides both primary and secondary care. PARTICIPANTS: This study included haemodialysis outpatients admitted for bacteraemia suspicion, who had blood drawn for cultures within 48 hours of their initial admission. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was overall in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 28-day in-hospital mortality and the incidence of bacteraemia diagnosed based on blood culture findings. The discrimination, calibration and test performance of the qSOFA score were assessed. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. RESULTS: Among the 507 haemodialysis patients admitted with bacteraemia suspicion between August 2011 and July 2013, the overall in-hospital mortality was 14.6% (74/507), the 28-day in-hospital mortality was 11.1% (56/507) and the incidence of bacteraemia, defined as a positive blood culture, was 13.4% (68/507). For predicting in-hospital mortality among haemodialysis patients, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.61 (95% CI 0.56-0.67) for a qSOFA score ≥2. The Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistics for the qSOFA score as a predictor of overall and 28-day in-hospital mortality were 5.72 (p=0.02) and 7.40 (p<0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: On external validation, the qSOFA score exhibited low diagnostic accuracy and miscalibration for in-hospital mortality and bacteraemia among haemodialysis patients.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Incidência , Japão , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 650, 2019 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31331272

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the oral switch (OS) stewardship intervention in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This was a retrospective study with a convenience sample in two Brazilian ICUs from different hospitals in patients with sepsis receiving antibiotic therapy. The stewardship intervention included OS in patients diagnosed with sepsis when clinical stability was achieved. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Other variables evaluated were as follows: cost of antimicrobial treatment, daily costs of intensive care, acute kidney injury, and length of stay. RESULTS: There was no difference in mortality between the OS and non-OS groups (p = 0.06). Length of stay in the ICU (p = 0.029) was shorter and acute kidney injury incidence (p = 0.032) and costs of antimicrobial therapy (p < 0.001) were lower in the OS group. CONCLUSION: OS stewardship programs in the ICU may be considered a safe strategy. Switch therapy reduced the cost and shortened the length of stay in ICUs.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Administração Intravenosa , Administração Oral , Idoso , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/economia , Brasil , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Eur J Intern Med ; 65: 86-92, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31128976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sepsis has been associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aims were to determine predictors of mortality among patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) and to ascertain the role of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in predicting poor outcomes. METHODS: All internal medicine patients with BSIs at the Hospital of Jura, Switzerland during a three year period (July 2014 to June 2017) were included. RESULTS: Among 404 BSIs, Escherichia coli represented the most common species isolated (156 episodes; 38.6%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (68; 16.8%). The most common site of infection was urinary tract accounting for 39.6% of BSIs (160 episodes). Thirty-day mortality was 18.1%. Multivariate analysis revealed BSI due to staphylococci, malignancy (haematologic or solid organ), qSOFA≥2 points, Pitt bacteraemia score as independent predictors of mortality, while appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy and administration of antibiotic therapy within three hours from infection's recognition were identified as a predictor of good prognosis. qSOFA showed the highest sensitivity (87.7%), negative predictive value (96.6%) and accuracy (0.83) as compared to other scores. Mortality among 141 septic patients was 45.4%. Malignancy (haematologic or solid organ), primary BSI, Pitt bacteraemia score, were independently associated with mortality, while appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy and administration of antibiotic therapy within the first hour from infection's recognition were associated with better prognosis. CONCLUSION: qSOFA as compared to other severity scores showed an excellent negative predictive value. Better prognosis was associated with administration of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy and its timely initiation.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Medicina Interna/organização & administração , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Suíça/epidemiologia
15.
Korean J Intern Med ; 34(6): 1347-1362, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29347812

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is highly prevalent in hospitals, and has recently emerged in the community. The impact of methicillin-resistance on mortality and medical costs for patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) requires reevaluation. METHODS: We searched studies with SAB or endocarditis using electronic databases including Ovid-Medline, Embase-Medline, and Cochrane Library, as well as five local databases for published studies during the period January 2000 to September 2011. RESULTS: A total of 2,841 studies were identified, 62 of which involved 17,563 adult subjects and were selected as eligible. A significant increase in overall mortality associated with MRSA, compared to that with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), was evidenced by an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73 to 2.21; p < 0.01). In 13 endocarditis studies, MRSA increased the risk of mortality, with an OR of 2.65 (95% CI, 1.46 to 4.80). When three studies, which compared mortality rates between CA-MRSA and CA-MSSA, were combined, the risk of methicillin-resistance increased 3.23-fold compared to MSSA (95% CI, 1.25 to 8.34). The length of hospital stay in the MRSA group was 10 days longer than that in the MSSA group (95% CI, 3.36 to 16.70). Of six studies that reported medical costs, two were included in the analysis, which estimated medical costs to be $9,954.58 (95% CI, 8,951.99 to 10,957.17). CONCLUSION: MRSA is still associated with increased mortality, longer hospital stays and medical costs, compared with MSSA in SAB in studies published since the year 2000.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/terapia , Endocardite Bacteriana/terapia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/terapia , Bacteriemia/economia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Endocardite Bacteriana/economia , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/mortalidade , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/economia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 26(4): 234-241, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29768299

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score showed good prognostic performance in patients with suspicion of infection in the emergency department (ED). However, previous studies only assessed the performance of individual values of qSOFA during the ED stay. As this score may vary over short timeframes, the optimal time of measurement, and the prognostic value of its variation are unclear. The objective of the present study was to prospectively assess the prognostic value of the change in qSOFA over the first 3 h (ΔqSOFA = qSOFA at 3 h-qSOFA at inclusion). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is an international prospective cohort study conducted in 17 EDs in France, Belgium, and Spain. From November 2016 to March 2017, patients with a suspected infection and a qSOFA score of 2 or higher were included and followed up until death or hospital discharge. qSOFA was measured at inclusion, 1 h and 3 h. Primary end point was in-hospital mortality, truncated at 28 days. RESULTS: Of 534 recruited patients, 512 were included in the analysis. The qSOFA was improved at 3 h (ΔqSOFA < 0) in 287 (55%) patients. Overall in-hospital mortality was 27%: 44% when ΔqSOFA greater than 0, 36% when ΔqSOFA = 0, and 18% when ΔqSOFA less than 0. A positive ΔqSOFA was independently associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted hazard ratio of 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.68). After modeling qSOFA kinetics in the first 3 h, there was a significant difference in adjusted slopes between patients who died and those who survived (0.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.09-0.22, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected infection presenting to the ED with a qSOFA of 2 or higher, the early change in qSOFA is a strong independent predictor of mortality.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/diagnóstico , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/mortalidade , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/terapia , Bélgica , Causas de Morte , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , França , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Espanha
17.
Jpn J Infect Dis ; 72(2): 124-126, 2019 Mar 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30381688

RESUMO

We hypothesized that quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) would be associated with 30-day mortality in bacteremia caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria and might be a selection criterion for the use of carbapenem as initial empirical therapy. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in six hospitals. All patients who had bacteremia due to ESBL-producing bacteria were included in the study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze 30-day mortality as the main outcome. A total of 203 adult patients were identified with bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Proteus mirabilis. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae or P. mirabilis (odds ratio [OR] 5.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-15.56), underlying liver disease (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.09-10.00), and underlying solid cancer (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.27-9.69) were associated with 30-day mortality. In a subgroup analysis, empirical non-carbapenem therapy was associated with 30-day mortality in bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae or P. mirabilis. Our results suggest that the qSOFA score is not a selection criterion for the use of carbapenem in initial empirical therapy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/patologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , beta-Lactamases/análise , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidade , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/patologia , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
18.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 38(1): 161-170, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30367313

RESUMO

There are few prospective studies with sufficient duration in time to evaluate clinical and antibiotic resistance impact of antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP). This is a descriptive study between January 2012 and December 2017, pre-post intervention. A meropenem ASP was initiated in January 2015; in patients who started treatment with meropenem, an infectious disease physician performed treatment recommendations to prescribers. Prospective information was collected to evaluate adequacy of meropenem prescription to local guidelines and to compare results between cases with accepted or rejected intervention. Analysis was performed to verify variables associated with intervention acceptance and with any significant change in meropenem consumption, hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant (MDR) bloodstream infections (BSIs), and 30-day all-cause crude death in MDR BSIs. Adequacy of meropenem prescription and de-escalation from meropenem treatment to narrower-spectrum antibiotic improved progressively over time, after ASP implementation (p < 0.001). Interventions on prescription were performed in 330 (38.7%) patients without meropenem justified treatment; in 269, intervention was accepted and in 61 not. Intervention acceptance was associated with shorter duration of treatment, cost, and inpatient days (p < 0.05); intervention rejection was not associated with severity of patient. During the period 2015-2017, meropenem consumption decreased compared with 2012-2014 (rate ratio [RR] 0.67; 95% CI 0.58-0.77, p < 0.001). Also decreased were hospital-acquired MDR BSI rate (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.38-1.02, p = 0,048) and 30-day all-cause crude death in MDR BSIs (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.14-1.24, p = 0.096), coinciding in time with ASP start-up. The decrease and better use of meropenem achieved had a sustained clinical, economic, and ecological impact, reducing costs and mortality of hospital-acquired MDR BSIs.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/estatística & dados numéricos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Criança , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
19.
Health Technol Assess ; 22(59): 1-148, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30382016

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is a common and frequently fatal infection. Adjunctive rifampicin may enhance early S. aureus killing, sterilise infected foci and blood faster, and thereby reduce the risk of dissemination, metastatic infection and death. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether or not adjunctive rifampicin reduces bacteriological (microbiologically confirmed) failure/recurrence or death through 12 weeks from randomisation. Secondary objectives included evaluating the impact of rifampicin on all-cause mortality, clinically defined failure/recurrence or death, toxicity, resistance emergence, and duration of bacteraemia; and assessing the cost-effectiveness of rifampicin. DESIGN: Parallel-group, randomised (1 : 1), blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre trial. SETTING: UK NHS trust hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adult inpatients (≥ 18 years) with meticillin-resistant or susceptible S. aureus grown from one or more blood cultures, who had received < 96 hours of antibiotic therapy for the current infection, and without contraindications to rifampicin. INTERVENTIONS: Adjunctive rifampicin (600-900 mg/day, oral or intravenous) or placebo for 14 days in addition to standard antibiotic therapy. Investigators and patients were blinded to trial treatment. Follow-up was for 12 weeks (assessments at 3, 7, 10 and 14 days, weekly until discharge and final assessment at 12 weeks post randomisation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was all-cause bacteriological (microbiologically confirmed) failure/recurrence or death through 12 weeks from randomisation. RESULTS: Between December 2012 and October 2016, 758 eligible participants from 29 UK hospitals were randomised: 370 to rifampicin and 388 to placebo. The median age was 65 years [interquartile range (IQR) 50-76 years]. A total of 485 (64.0%) infections were community acquired and 132 (17.4%) were nosocomial; 47 (6.2%) were caused by meticillin-resistant S. aureus. A total of 301 (39.7%) participants had an initial deep infection focus. Standard antibiotics were given for a median of 29 days (IQR 18-45 days) and 619 (81.7%) participants received flucloxacillin. By 12 weeks, 62 out of 370 (16.8%) patients taking rifampicin versus 71 out of 388 (18.3%) participants taking the placebo experienced bacteriological (microbiologically confirmed) failure/recurrence or died [absolute risk difference -1.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -7.0% to 4.3%; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.35; p = 0.81]. There were 4 (1.1%) and 5 (1.3%) bacteriological failures (p = 0.82) in the rifampicin and placebo groups, respectively. There were 3 (0.8%) versus 16 (4.1%) bacteriological recurrences (p = 0.01), and 55 (14.9%) versus 50 (12.9%) deaths without bacteriological failure/recurrence (p = 0.30) in the rifampicin and placebo groups, respectively. Over 12 weeks, there was no evidence of differences in clinically defined failure/recurrence/death (p = 0.84), all-cause mortality (p = 0.60), serious (p = 0.17) or grade 3/4 (p = 0.36) adverse events (AEs). However, 63 (17.0%) participants in the rifampicin group versus 39 (10.1%) participants in the placebo group experienced antibiotic or trial drug-modifying AEs (p = 0.004), and 24 (6.5%) participants in the rifampicin group versus 6 (1.5%) participants in the placebo group experienced drug-interactions (p = 0.0005). Evaluation of the costs and health-related quality-of-life impacts revealed that an episode of S. aureus bacteraemia costs an average of £12,197 over 12 weeks. Rifampicin was estimated to save 10% of episode costs (p = 0.14). After adjustment, the effect of rifampicin on total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) was positive (0.004 QALYs), but not statistically significant (standard error 0.004 QALYs). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive rifampicin provided no overall benefit over standard antibiotic therapy in adults with S. aureus bacteraemia. FUTURE WORK: Given the substantial mortality, other antibiotic combinations or improved source management should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN37666216, EudraCT 2012-000344-10 and Clinical Trials Authorisation 00316/0243/001. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 59. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Idoso , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/economia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Método Duplo-Cego , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Rifampina/efeitos adversos , Rifampina/economia , Staphylococcus aureus , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA