RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding has positive impacts on the health, environment, and economic wealth of families and countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) in 1991 as a global program to incentivize maternity services to implement the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (Ten Steps). These were developed to ensure that maternity services remove barriers for mothers and families to successfully initiate breastfeeding and to continue breastfeeding through referral to community support after hospital discharge. While more than three in four births in Australia take place in public hospitals, in 2020 only 26% of Australian hospitals were BFHI-accredited. So what is the social return to investing in BFHI accreditation in Australia, and does it incentivize BFHI accreditation? This study aimed to examine the social value of maintaining the BFHI accreditation in one public maternity unit in Australia using the Social Return on Investment (SROI) framework. This novel method was developed in 2000 and measures social, environmental and economic outcomes of change using monetary values. METHOD: The study was non-experimental and was conducted in the maternity unit of Calvary Public Hospital, Canberra, an Australian BFHI-accredited public hospital with around 1000 births annually. This facility provided an opportunity to illustrate costs for maintaining BFHI accreditation in a relatively affluent urban population. Stakeholders considered within scope of the study were the mother-baby dyad and the maternity facility. We interviewed the hospital's Director of Maternity Services and the Clinical Midwifery Educator, guided by a structured questionnaire, which examined the cost (financial, time and other resources) and benefits of each of the Ten Steps. Analysis was informed by the Social Return on Investment (SROI) framework, which consists of mapping the stakeholders, identifying and valuing outcomes, establishing impact, calculating the ratio and conducting sensitivity analysis. This information was supplemented with micro costing studies from the literature that measure the benefits of the BFHI. RESULTS: The social return from the BFHI in this facility was calculated to be AU$ 1,375,050. The total investment required was AU$ 24,433 per year. Therefore, the SROI ratio was approximately AU$ 55:1 (sensitivity analysis: AU$ 16-112), which meant that every AU$1 invested in maintaining BFHI accreditation by this maternal and newborn care facility generated approximately AU$55 of benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Scaled up nationally, the BFHI could provide important benefits to the Australian health system and national economy. In this public hospital, the BFHI produced social value greater than the cost of investment, providing new evidence of its effectiveness and economic gains as a public health intervention. Our findings using a novel tool to calculate the social rate of return, indicate that the BHFI accreditation is an investment in the health and wellbeing of families, communities and the Australian economy, as well as in health equity.
Assuntos
Acreditação/estatística & dados numéricos , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Valores Sociais , Acreditação/economia , Austrália , Aleitamento Materno/economia , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/economia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Recém-Nascido , Política Organizacional , Cuidado Pós-Natal/organização & administração , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários , Organização Mundial da SaúdeAssuntos
Cuidado do Lactente , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Finlândia , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Cuidado do Lactente/legislação & jurisprudência , Cuidado do Lactente/métodos , Cuidado do Lactente/organização & administração , Equipamentos para Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
When user fee exemptions were introduced for children under five years of age in Niger, front-line staff in the health system were not consulted in advance, and various obstacles seriously hindered the policy's implementation. Health workers developed two types of coping strategies. The first dealt with shortcomings of the policy implementation process related to management tools, drug stocks, co-existence of the fee exemption and cost recovery systems, and, above all, supply management for medicines (ordering from private companies, issuing makeshift prescriptions). The second involved clientelism, circumvention of regulations, and misappropriation of resources. Adverse effects have arisen due to both the failings of the health system and the practices of health workers. These include a focus on the commercial management of patients, the most 'costly' of whom sometimes find themselves being refused treatment, patients roaming in search of medicines and treatment, and a decline in quality of care.
Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Honorários Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Comunicação em Saúde/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Bem-Estar do Lactente , Administração em Saúde Pública/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Pré-Escolar , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Honorários Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Níger/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Administração em Saúde Pública/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing for clinical applications is now an integral part of medical genetics practice. The term newborn screening refers to public health programs designed to screen newborns for various treatable metabolic conditions, by measuring levels of circulating blood metabolites. The availability and significant decrease in sequencing costs has raised the question of whether metabolic newborn screening should be replaced by whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing. While newborn genome sequencing can potentially increase the number of disorders identified by newborn screening, the generalization of its practice raises a number of important ethical issues. This short article argues that there are medical, psychological, ethical and economic reasons why widespread dissemination of newborn screening is still premature.
Assuntos
Exoma/genética , Genoma Humano/genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/economia , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/ética , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/psicologia , Recém-Nascido , Triagem Neonatal/economia , Triagem Neonatal/éticaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Lack of access to information and knowledge about mother and child health was identified as a major contributor to poor maternal and child health in Nigeria. The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (PMNCH) has recognized mapping the knowledge management of Maternal Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) as one of the major strategies to be deployed in improving the health of these vulnerable groups. The main aim of this study is to map the knowledge management resources of Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) in rural and urban settings of Ilorin West LGA of Kwara state Nigeria. METHODS: It is a descriptive cross-sectional study with a comparative analysis of findings from urban and rural settings. Epi-mapping was used to carve out the LGA and map responses. The p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant at 95% confidence level. RESULTS: The study showed that traditional leader was responsible for more than half of the traditional way of obtaining information by rural (66.7%) and urban (56.2%) respondents while documentation accounts for the main MNCH knowledge preservation for the rural (40.6%) and the urban (50%) dwellers. Traditional leaders (32.2%) and elders (46.7%) were the main people responsible for dissemination of knowledge in rural areas whereas elders (35.9%) and Parents (19.9%) were the main people responsible in urban areas. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that traditional and family institutions are important in the knowledge management of MNCH in both rural and urban settings of Nigeria.
Assuntos
Proteção da Criança , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar do Lactente , Gestão do Conhecimento , Serviços de Saúde Materna/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Proteção da Criança/economia , Proteção da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Mapeamento Geográfico , Recursos em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Gestão do Conhecimento/economia , Gestão do Conhecimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil/economia , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/organização & administração , Gravidez , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Parto Obstétrico/economia , Obtenção de Fundos/organização & administração , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Tocologia/economia , Complicações na Gravidez/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Nigéria , Pobreza/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Cuidado Pré-Natal/economia , Setor PrivadoRESUMO
Avenir d'Enfants [Future of Children] emerged from a partnership between the government of Quebec and the Lucie and André Chagnon Foundation. The organization aims to provide local communities with resources, in order to support synergy between the principal early childhood organizations: childcare services, healthcare services, schools, family community organizations and municipalities. This article presents the context in which Avenir d'Enfants came into being, explains how the organization helps create the right conditions for local and regional initiatives to have an impact on the development of children living in a situation of poverty, and presents the challenges and success factors of this approach.
Assuntos
Proteção da Criança/economia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil/organização & administração , Pobreza , Pré-Escolar , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/economia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/normas , Redes Comunitárias/economia , Redes Comunitárias/organização & administração , Redes Comunitárias/normas , Apoio Financeiro , Programas Governamentais , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Relações Interinstitucionais , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil/economia , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil/normas , Quebeque , Instituições AcadêmicasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stress, depression, and anxiety affect 15 to 25% of pregnant women. However, fewer than 20% of prenatal care providers assess and treat mental health problems and fewer than 20% of pregnant women seek mental healthcare. For those who seek treatment, the lack of health system integration and existing barriers frequently prevent treatment access. Without treatment, poor prenatal mental health can persist for years and impact future maternal, child, and family well-being. METHODS/DESIGN: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated process of online psychosocial assessment, referral, and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for pregnant women compared to usual prenatal care (no formal screening or specialized care). The primary outcome is self-reported prenatal depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms at 6 to 8 weeks postrandomization. Secondary outcomes are postpartum depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms; self-efficacy; mastery; self-esteem; sleep; relationship quality; coping; resilience; Apgar score; gestational age; birth weight; maternal-infant attachment; infant behavior and development; parenting stress/competence; and intervention cost-effectiveness, efficiency, feasibility, and acceptability. Pregnant women are eligible if they: 1) are <28 weeks gestation; 2) speak/read English; 3) are willing to complete email questionnaires; 4) have no, low, or moderate psychosocial risk on screening at recruitment; and 5) are eligible for CBT. A sample of 816 women will be recruited from large, urban primary care clinics and allocation is by computer-generated randomization. Women in the intervention group will complete an online psychosocial assessment, and those with mild or moderate depression, anxiety, or stress symptoms then complete six interactive cognitive behavior therapy modules. All women will complete email questionnaires at 6 to 8 weeks postrandomization and at 3, 6, and 12 months postpartum. Clinic-based providers and researchers conducting chart abstraction and analysis are blinded. Qualitative interviews with 8 to 10 healthcare providers and 15 to 30 intervention group women will provide data on feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Results of this trial will determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an integrated approach to prenatal mental healthcare and the use of highly accessible computer-based psychosocial assessment and CBT on maternal, infant, and family-based outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01901796.
Assuntos
Desenvolvimento Infantil , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Bem-Estar do Lactente , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Bem-Estar Materno , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Saúde Mental , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Projetos de Pesquisa , Terapia Assistida por Computador , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/psicologia , Ansiedade/terapia , Canadá , Protocolos Clínicos , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Depressão Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Depressão Pós-Parto/psicologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/terapia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Recém-Nascido , Internet , Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Saúde Mental/economia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/economia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/economia , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/terapia , Terapia Assistida por Computador/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
To describe the efforts of a community-based maternal and child health coalition to integrate the life course into its planning and programs, as well as implementation challenges and results of these activities. Jacksonville-Duval County has historically had infant mortality rates that are significantly higher than state and national rates, particularly among its African American population. In an effort to address this disparity, the Northeast Florida Healthy Start Coalition embraced the life course approach as a model. This model was adopted as a framework for (1) community needs assessment and planning; (2) delivery of direct services, including case management, education and support in the Magnolia Project, its federal Healthy Start program; (3) development of community collaborations, education and awareness; and, (4) advocacy and grass roots leadership development. Implementation experience as well as challenges in transforming traditional approaches to delivering maternal and child health services are described. Operationalizing the life course approach required the Coalition to think differently about risks, levels of intervention and the way services are organized and delivered. The organization set the stage by using the life course as a framework for its required local planning and needs assessments. Based on these assessments, the content of case management and other key services provided by our federal Healthy Start program was modified to address not only health behaviors but also underlying social determinants and community factors. Individual interventions were augmented with group activities to build interdependence among participants, increasing social capital. More meaningful inter-agency collaboration that moved beyond the usual referral relationships were developed to better address participants' needs. And finally, strategies to cultivate participant advocacy and community leadership skills, were implemented to promote social change at the neighborhood-level. Transforming traditional approaches to delivering maternal and child health services and sustaining change is a long and laborious process. The Coalition has taken the first steps; but its efforts are far from complete. Based on the agency's initial implementation experience, three areas presented particular challenges: staff, resources and evaluation. The life course is an important addition to the MCH toolbox. Community-based MCH programs should assess how a life course approach can be incorporated into existing programs to broaden their focus, and, potentially, their impact on health disparities and birth outcomes. Some areas to consider include planning and needs assessment, direct service delivery, inter-agency collaboration, and community leadership development. Continued disparities for people of color, despite medical advances, demand new interventions that purposefully address social inequities and promote advocacy among groups that bear a disproportionate burden of infant mortality. Successful transformation of current approaches requires investment in staff training to garner buy-in, flexible resources and the development of new metrics to measure the impact of the life course approach on individual and programmatic outcomes.
Assuntos
Redes Comunitárias/organização & administração , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil/organização & administração , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração de Caso/organização & administração , Administração de Caso/normas , Redes Comunitárias/economia , Redes Comunitárias/normas , Comportamento Cooperativo , Feminino , Financiamento Governamental , Florida , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/economia , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil/etnologia , Mortalidade Infantil/tendências , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/etnologia , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil/economia , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil/normas , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/etnologia , Marketing Social , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Health insurance in the United States is a patchwork system whereby opportunities for coverage are strongly associated with life circumstances (ie, age, income, pregnancy, parental status). For pregnant women, this situation contributes to unstable coverage before, between, and after pregnancies. The Affordable Care Act has the potential to make coverage for women of reproductive age more stable and create new opportunities to intervene on conditions associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity. In this article, we discuss the health economics of the Affordable Care Act, its implications for maternal and neonatal health, specific challenges associated with implementation, and opportunities for obstetricians to leverage the Affordable Care Act to improve the care of women.
Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Lactente/legislação & jurisprudência , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Bem-Estar Materno/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Feminino , Ginecologia/economia , Ginecologia/tendências , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Recém-Nascido , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Obstetrícia/economia , Obstetrícia/tendências , Gravidez , Saúde Reprodutiva/economia , Saúde Reprodutiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Reprodutiva/tendênciasAssuntos
Aleitamento Materno/economia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Cuidado do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Cuidado do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Marketing Social , Medicina Estatal , Reino UnidoRESUMO
Projection of current trends in maternal and neonatal mortality reduction shows that many countries will fall short of the UN Millennium Development Goal 4 and 5. Underutilization of maternal health services contributes to this poor progress toward reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Moreover, the quality of services continues to lag in many countries, with a negative effect on the health of women and their babies, including deterring women from seeking care. To enhance the use and provision of quality maternal care, countries and donors are increasingly using financial incentives. This paper introduces the JHPN Supplement, in which each paper reviews the evidence of the effectiveness of a specific financial incentive instrument with the aim of improving the use and quality of maternal healthcare and impact. The US Agency for International Development and the US National Institutes of Health convened a US Government Evidence Summit on Enhancing Provision and Use of Maternal Health Services through Financial Incentives on 24-25 April 2012 in Washington, DC. The Summit brought together leading global experts in finance, maternal health, and health systems from governments, academia, development organizations, and foundations to assess the evidence on whether financial incentives significantly and substantially increase provision, use and quality of maternal health services, and the contextual factors that impact the effectiveness of these incentives. Evidence review teams evaluated the multidisciplinary evidence of various financial mechanisms, including supply-side incentives (e.g. performance-based financing, user fees, and various insurance mechanisms) and demand-side incentives (e.g. conditional cash transfers, vouchers, user fee exemptions, and subsidies for care-seeking). At the Summit, the teams presented a synthesis of evidence and initial recommendations on practice, policy, and research for discussion. The Summit enabled structured feedback on recommendations which the teams included in their final papers appearing in this Supplement. Papers in this Supplement review the evidence for a specific financial incentive mechanism (e.g. pay for performance, conditional cash transfer) to improve the use and quality of maternal healthcare and makes recommendations for programmes and future research. While data on programmes using financial incentives for improved use and indications of the quality of maternal health services support specific conclusions and recommendations, including those for future research, data linking the use of financial incentives with improved health outcomes are minimal.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Internacionalidade , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Motivação , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Reembolso de Incentivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , United States Agency for International DevelopmentRESUMO
Health financing strategies that incorporate financial incentives are being applied in many low- and middle-income countries, and improving maternal and neonatal health is often a central goal. As yet, there have been few reviews of such programmes and their impact on maternal health. The US Government Evidence Summit on Enhancing Provision and use of Maternal Health Services through Financial Incentives was convened on 24-25 April 2012 to address this gap. This article, the final in a series assessing the effects of financial incentives--performance-based incentives (PBIs), insurance, user fee exemption programmes, conditional cash transfers, and vouchers--summarizes the evidence and discusses issues of context, programme design and implementation, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability. We suggest key areas to consider when designing and implementing financial incentive programmes for enhancing maternal health and highlight gaps in evidence that could benefit from additional research. Although the methodological rigor of studies varies, the evidence, overall, suggests that financial incentives can enhance demand for and improve the supply of maternal health services. Definitive evidence demonstrating a link between incentives and improved health outcomes is lacking; however, the evidence suggests that financial incentives can increase the quantity and quality of maternal health services and address health systems and financial barriers that prevent women from accessing and providers from delivering quality, lifesaving maternal healthcare.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Internacionalidade , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Motivação , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodosRESUMO
Recognizing the need for evidence to inform US Government and governments of the low- and middle-income countries on efficient, effective maternal health policies, strategies, and programmes, the US Government convened the Evidence Summit on Enhancing Provision and Use of Maternal Health Services through Financial Incentives in April 2012 in Washington, DC, USA. This paper summarizes the background and methods for the acquisition and evaluation of the evidence used for achieving the goals of the Summit. The goal of the Summit was to obtain multidisciplinary expert review of literature to inform both US Government and governments of the low- and middle-income countries on evidence-informed practice, policies, and strategies for financial incentives. Several steps were undertaken to define the tasks for the Summit and identify the appropriate evidence for review. The process began by identifying focal questions intended to inform governments of the low-and middle-income countries and the US Government about the efficacy of supply- and demand-side financial incentives for enhanced provision and use of quality maternal health services. Experts were selected representing the research and programme communities, academia, relevant non-governmental organizations, and government agencies and were assembled into Evidence Review Teams. This was followed by a systematic process to gather relevant peer-reviewed literature that would inform the focal questions. Members of the Evidence Review Teams were invited to add relevant papers not identified in the initial literature review to complete the bibliography. The Evidence Review Teams were asked to comply with a specific evaluation framework for recommendations on practice and policy based on both expert opinion and the quality of the data. Details of the search processes and methods used for screening and quality reviews are described.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Internacionalidade , Serviços de Saúde Materna/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Motivação , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Reembolso de Incentivo/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Performance-based incentives (PBIs) aim to counteract weak providers' performance in health systems of many developing countries by providing rewards that are directly linked to better health outcomes for mothers and their newborns. Translating funding into better health requires many actions by a large number of people. The actions span from community to the national level. While different forms of PBIs are being implemented in a number of countries to improve health outcomes, there has not been a systematic review of the evidence of their impact on the health of mothers and newborns. This paper analyzes and synthesizes the available evidence from published studies on the impact of supply-side PBIs on the quantity and quality of health services for mothers and newborns. This paper reviews evidence from published and grey literature that spans PBI for public-sector facilities, PBI in social insurance reforms, and PBI in NGO contracting. Some initiatives focus on safe deliveries, and others reward a broader package of results that include deliveries. The Evidence Review Team that focused on supply-side incentives for the US Government Evidence Summit on Enhancing Provision and Use of Maternal Health Services through Financial Incentives, reviewed published research reports and papers and added studies from additional grey literature that were deemed relevant. After collecting and reviewing 17 documents, nine studies were included in this review, three of which used before-after designs; four included comparison or control groups; one applied econometric methods to a five-year time series; and one reported results from a large-scale impact evaluation with randomly-assigned intervention and control facilities. The available evidence suggests that incentives that reward providers for institutional deliveries result in an increase in the number of institutional deliveries. There is some evidence that the content of antenatal care can improve with PBI. We found no direct evidence on the impact of PBI on neonatal health services or on mortality of mothers and newborns, although intention of the study was not to document impact on mortality. A number of studies describe approaches to rewarding quality as well as increases in the quantities of services provided, although how quality is defined and monitored is not always clear. Because incentives exist in all health systems, considering how to align the incentives of the many health workers and their supervisors so that they focus efforts on achieving health goals for mothers and newborns is critical if the health system is to perform more effectively and efficiently. A wide range of PBI models is being developed and tested, and there is still much to learn about what works best. Future studies should include a larger focus on rewarding quality and measuring its impact. Finally, more qualitative research to better understand PBI implementation and how various incentive models function in different settings is needed to help practitioners refine and improve their programmes.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/economia , Nível de Saúde , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Internacionalidade , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Mães , Motivação , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodosRESUMO
Maternal and newborn health (MNH) is a high priority for global health and is included among the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, the slow decline in maternal and newborn mortality jeopardizes achievements of the targets of MDGs. According to UNICEF, 60 million women give birth outside of health facilities, and family planning needs are satisfied for only 50%. Further, skilled birth attendance and the use of antenatal care are most inequitably distributed in maternal and newborn health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been shown to increase health service utilization among the poorest but little is written on the effects of such programmes on maternal and newborn health. We carried out a systematic review of studies on CCT that report maternal and newborn health outcomes, including studies from 8 countries. The CCT programmes have increased antenatal visits, skilled attendance at birth, delivery at a health facility, and tetanus toxoid vaccination for mothers and reduced the incidence of low birthweight. The programmes have not had a significant impact on fertility while the impact on maternal and newborn mortality has not been well-documented thus far. Given these positive effects, we make the case for further investment in CCT programmes for maternal and newborn health, noting gaps in knowledge and providing recommendations for better design and evaluation of such programmes. We recommend more rigorous impact evaluations that document impact pathways and take factors, such as cost-effectiveness, into account.
Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Internacionalidade , Serviços de Saúde Materna/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Motivação , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodosRESUMO
User fee removal has been put forward as an approach to increasing priority health service utilization, reducing impoverishment, and ultimately reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. However, user fees are a source of facility revenue in many low-income countries, often used for purchasing drugs and supplies and paying incentives to health workers. This paper reviews evidence on the effects of user fee exemptions on maternal health service utilization, service provision, and outcomes, including both supply-side and demand-side effects. We reviewed 19 peer-reviewed research articles addressing user fee exemptions and maternal health services or outcomes published since 1990. Studies were identified through a USAID-commissioned call for evidence, key word search, and screening process. Teams of reviewers assigned criteria-based quality scores to each paper and prepared structured narrative reviews. The grade of the evidence was found to be relatively weak, mainly from short-term, non-controlled studies. The introduction of user fee exemptions appears to have resulted in increased rates of facility-based deliveries and caesarean sections in some contexts. Impacts on maternal and neonatal mortality have not been conclusively demonstrated; exemptions for delivery care may contribute to modest reductions in institutional maternal mortality but the evidence is very weak. User fee exemptions were found to have negative, neutral, or inconclusive effects on availability of inputs, provider motivation, and quality of services. The extent to which user fee revenue lost by facilities is replaced can directly affect service provision and may have unintended consequences for provider motivation. Few studies have looked at the equity effects of fee removal, despite clear evidence that fees disproportionately burden the poor. This review highlights potential and documented benefits (increased use of maternity services) as well as risks (decreased provider motivation and quality) of user fee exemption policies for maternal health services. Governments should link user fee exemption policies with the replacement of lost revenue for facilities as well as broader health system improvements, including facility upgrades, ensured supply of needed inputs, and improved human resources for health. Removing user fees may increase uptake but will not reduce mortality proportionally if the quality of facility-based care is poor. More rigorous evaluations of both demand- and supply-side effects of mature fee exemption programmes are needed.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Internacionalidade , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Reembolso de Incentivo/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Financial barriers can affect timely access to maternal health services. Health insurance can influence the use and quality of these services and potentially improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence on health insurance and its effects on the use and provision of maternal health services and on maternal and neonatal health outcomes in middle- and low-income countries. Studies were identified through a literature search in key databases and consultation with experts in healthcare financing and maternal health. Twenty-nine articles met the review criteria of focusing on health insurance and its effect on the use or quality of maternal health services, or maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Sixteen studies assessed demand-side effects of insurance, eight focused on supply-side effects, and the remainder addressed both. Geographically, the studies provided evidence from sub-Saharan Africa (n = 11), Asia (n = 9), Latin America (n = 8), and Turkey. The studies included examples from national or social insurance schemes (n = 7), government-run public health insurance schemes (n = 4), community-based health insurance schemes (n = 11), and private insurance (n = 3). Half of the studies used econometric analyses while the remaining provided descriptive statistics or qualitative results. There is relatively consistent evidence that health insurance is positively correlated with the use of maternal health services. Only four studies used methods that can establish this causal relationship. Six studies presented suggestive evidence of over-provision of caesarean sections in response to providers' payment incentives through health insurance. Few studies focused on the relationship between health insurance and the quality of maternal health services or maternal and neonatal health outcomes. The available evidence on the quality and health outcomes is inconclusive, given the differences in measurement, contradictory findings, and statistical limitations. Consistent with economic theories, the studies identified a positive relationship between health insurance and the use of maternal health services. However, more rigorous causal methods are needed to identify the extent to which the use of these services increases among the insured. Better measurement of quality and the use of cross-country analyses would solidify the evidence on the impact of insurance on the quality of maternal health services and maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Internacionalidade , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/economia , GravidezRESUMO
It is increasingly clear that Millennium Development Goal 4 and 5 will not be achieved in many low- and middle-income countries with the weakest gains among the poor. Recognizing that there are large inequalities in reproductive health outcomes, the post-2015 agenda on universal health coverage will likely generate strategies that target resources where maternal and newborn deaths are the highest. In 2012, the United States Agency for International Development convened an Evidence Summit to review the knowledge and gaps on the utilization of financial incentives to enhance the quality and uptake of maternal healthcare. The goal was to provide donors and governments of the low- and middle-income countries with evidence-informed recommendations on practice, policy, and strategies regarding the use of financial incentives, including vouchers, to enhance the demand and supply of maternal health services. The findings in this paper are intended to guide governments interested in maternal health voucher programmes with recommendations for sustainable implementation and impact. The Evidence Summit undertook a systematic review of five financing strategies. This paper presents the methods and findings for vouchers, building on a taxonomy to catalogue knowledge about voucher programme design and functionality. More than 120 characteristics under five major categories were identified: programme principles (objectives and financing); governance and management; benefits package and beneficiary targeting; providers (contracting and service pricing); and implementation arrangements (marketing, claims processing, and monitoring and evaluation). Among the 28 identified maternal health voucher programmes, common characteristics included: a stated objective to increase the use of services among the means-tested poor; contracted-out programme management; contracting either exclusively private facilities or a mix of public and private providers; prioritizing community-based distribution of vouchers; and tracking individual claims for performance purposes. Maternal voucher programmes differed on whether contracted providers were given training on clinical or administrative issues; whether some form of service verification was undertaken at facility or community-level; and the relative size of programme management costs in the overall programme budget. Evidence suggests voucher programmes can serve populations with national-level impact. Reaching scale depends on whether the voucher programme can: (i) keep management costs low, (ii) induce a large demand-side response among the bottom two quintiles, and (iii) achieve a quality of care that translates a greater number of facility-based deliveries into a reduction in maternal morbidity and mortality.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Bem-Estar Materno/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/economia , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Internacionalidade , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Neonatal mortality accounts for 43% of global under-five deaths and is decreasing more slowly than maternal or child mortality. Donor funding has increased for maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH), but no analysis to date has disaggregated aid for newborns. We evaluated if and how aid flows for newborn care can be tracked, examined changes in the last decade, and considered methodological implications for tracking funding for specific population groups or diseases. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We critically reviewed and categorised previous analyses of aid to specific populations, diseases, or types of activities. We then developed and refined key terms related to newborn survival in seven languages and searched titles and descriptions of donor disbursement records in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Creditor Reporting System database, 2002-2010. We compared results with the Countdown to 2015 database of aid for MNCH (2003-2008) and the search strategy used by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Prior to 2005, key terms related to newborns were rare in disbursement records but their frequency increased markedly thereafter. Only two mentions were found of "stillbirth" and only nine references were found to "fetus" in any spelling variant or language. The total value of non-research disbursements mentioning any newborn search terms rose from US$38.4 million in 2002 to US$717.1 million in 2010 (constant 2010 US$). The value of non-research projects exclusively benefitting newborns fluctuated somewhat but remained low, at US$5.7 million in 2010. The United States and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) provided the largest value of non-research funding mentioning and exclusively benefitting newborns, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Donor attention to newborn survival has increased since 2002, but it appears unlikely that donor aid is commensurate with the 3.0 million newborn deaths and 2.7 million stillbirths each year. We recommend that those tracking funding for other specific population groups, diseases, or activities consider a key term search approach in the Creditor Reporting System along with a detailed review of their data, but that they develop their search terms and interpretations carefully, taking into account the limitations described. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.