The effect of on-demand vs deep neuromuscular relaxation on rating of surgical and anaesthesiologic conditions in patients undergoing thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (DEPTH trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Deep muscle relaxation has been shown to facilitate operating conditions during laparoscopic surgery. Minimally invasive esophageal surgery is a high-risk procedure in which the use of deep neuromuscular block (NMB) may improve conditions in the thoracic phase as well. Neuromuscular antagonists can be given on demand or by continuous infusion (deep NMB). However, the positioning of the patient often hampers train-of-four (TOF) monitoring. A continuous infusion thus may result in a deep NMB at the end of surgery. The use of neostigmine not only is insufficient for reversing deep NMB but also may be contraindicated for this procedure because of its cholinergic effects. Sugammadex is an effective alternative but is rather expensive. This study aims to evaluate the use of deep versus on-demand NMB on operating, anaesthesiologic conditions, and costs in patients undergoing a two- or three-phase thoracolaparoscopic esophageal resection. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a single-center randomized controlled double-blinded intervention study. Sixty-six patients undergoing a thoracolaparoscopic esophageal resection will be included. Patients will receive either continuous infusion of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg per hour (group 1) or continuous infusion of NaCl 0.9 % 0.06 ml/kg per hour (group 2). In both groups, on-demand boluses of rocuronium can be given (open-label design). The primary aim of this study is to compare the surgical rating scale (SRS) during the abdominal phase. Main secondary aims are to evaluate SRS during the thoracic phase, to evaluate anesthesiologic conditions, and to compare costs (in euros) associated with use of rocuronium, sugammadex, and duration of surgery. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to evaluate the benefits of deep neuromuscular relaxation on surgical and anaesthesiologic conditions during thoracolaparoscopic esophageal surgery. This surgical procedure is unique because it consists of both an abdominal phase and a thoracic phase taking place in different order depending on the subtype of surgery (a two- or three-stage transthoracic esophagectomy). In addition, possible benefits associated with deep NMB, such as decrease in operating time, will be weighed against costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) number: 2014-002147-18 (obtained 19 May 2014) ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02320734 (obtained 18 Dec. 2014).

SUGAMADEX: novos horizontes para a reversão do bloqueio neuromuscular / SUGAMMADEX: new horizons for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade

O sugamadex é uma droga nova e revolucionária desenvolvida como antagonista seletivo dos agentes bloqueadores neuromusculares (ABNM) esteroides (rocurônio > vecurônio ¼ pancurônio). O medicamento é uma y-ciclodextrina modificada e hidrossolúvel que forma um composto estável com o ABNM na razão de 1:1. Ele se liga ao ABNM livre no plasma, criando um gradiente de concentração que desloca o ABNM dos receptores nicotínicos na junção neuromuscular, levando à reversão completa e duradoura do BNM. O sugamadex não se liga às proteínas ou a qualquer outro receptor no organismo, o que lhe confere ótimo perfil de tolerância. O sugamadex pode ser usado na reversão do BNM profundo, promovendo recuperação mais rápida em relação à succinilcolina. Seu emprego pode diminuir a necessidade de monitorização do BNM, a incidência de bloqueio residual e ainda evitar os efeitos adversos causados pelos anticolinesterásicos e anticolinérgicos. Entretanto, também há limitações em relação à utilização 00 sugamadex. Ele impede o uso dos AB- NMs esteroides durante 24 horas, caso seja necessário novo BNM, e pode aumentar o risco do emprego desnecessário e indiscriminado dos ABNMs. Além disso, faltam dados da sua utilização em alguns grupos populacionais e de seu uso em larga escala. Por fim, deve-se considerar também o fator econômico, visto que se trata de uma droga nova e de valor ainda elevado no mercado...

Sugammadex is a novel and unique compaund designed as a selective antaganist ot steroidal neuromuscular blaeking agents (NMBA) (rocuronium>vecuronium¼pancuronium). The drug is a modified water-saluble y-cyclodextrin that forms a stable complex at a 1:1 ratio with the NMBA. It combines with the NMBA creating a concentration gradient favoring the movement ot the NMBA from the nicotine receptors ot the neuromuscular junction leading to the complete and lasting reversal af the neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Sugamadex does not bind to plasma proteins or any other receptors system in the body what provides him a great tolerance profile. Sugamadex can be used in the reversal af deep neuromuscular blockade with a faster recovery time in relation to succinylcholine. Its use can diminish the necessity af monitoring af the NMB, the incidence ot residual blockade and still prevent the adverse effects caused by the antiecholinesterase and anticholinergic drugs. However, there are limitatians regarding the use af Sugammadex. It hinders the use ot the steroidal NMBA during 24 hours if a new NMB must be restablished and it can increase the risk ot unnecessary and indiscriminate use af the NMBA. Mareaver, there is a laek ot data regarding the its use in some population groups and in large scale. Final/y, the economic factor must be also considered, since it is a new drug with a still raised value in market...

Utilization pattern and cost of sedation, analgesia and neuromuscular blockade in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit / Patrón de utilización y costo de la sedación, analgesia y bloqueo neuromuscular en una unidad multidisciplinaria de cuidados intensivos

OBJECTIVES: To study the utilization pattern and the cost of sedatives, analgesics and neuromuscular blocking agents in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in the ICU of the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Trinidad and Tobago, for a period of twelve weeks. All patients admitted to the ICU were enrolled. No interventions were done. Data collected included demographics, diagnoses on admission, length of stay in the ICU, status of mechanical ventilation, patient outcome, quantity of sedatives, analgesics and neuromuscular blocking agents used in every patient and their cost. RESULTS: There were 333 patient-days encountered from 34 patients studied. Midazolam, fentanyl and cisatracurium were the most commonly used sedative, opioid and neuromuscular blocking agents respectively. The total cost of drugs used for sedation, analgesia and neuromuscular blockade was approximately US$ 19 600 per annum. Cost for this treatment alone accounted for more than 50% of the total ICU drug costs. The costs were significantly higher in patients who stayed more than two weeks in the ICU when compared to those who stayed less than two weeks (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the utilization pattern and financial burden of sedation, analgesia and neuromuscular blockade in the delivery of critical care.

OBJETIVOS: Estudiar el patrón de utilización y costo de los sedantes, analgésicos, y agentes de bloqueo neuromuscular en una Unidad Multidisciplinaria de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI). MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo en la UCI del Complejo de Ciencias Médicas Eric Williams, en Trinidad y Tobago, por un período de doce semanas. Todos los pacientes ingresados a la UCI fueron enrolados. No se realizaron intervenciones. Los datos recogidos incluyeron demografías, diagnósticos de ingreso, longitud de la estadía en la UCI, estatus de ventilación mecánica, evolución del paciente, así como la cantidad y el costo de los sedantes, analgésicos y agentes de bloqueo neuromuscular usados en cada paciente. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron 333 días-pacientes a partir de 34 pacientes estudiados. La midazolama, el fentanil y el cisatracurio fueron los agentes sedativos, opioides y de bloqueo neuromuscular más comúnmente usados. El costo total de los medicamentos usados para la sedación, la analgesia y el bloqueo neuromuscular fue de aproximadamente $19 600 USD por año. El costo sólo para este tratamiento representó más del 50% del total de los costos de medicamentos de la UCI. Los costos fueron significativamente más altos en pacientes que permanecieron más de dos semanas en la UCI, en comparación con aquellos que permanecieron menos de dos semanas (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONES: El estudio pone de relieve el patrón de utilización de la carga financiera de la sedación, analgesia y bloqueo muscular a la hora de ofrecer atención crítica.

Utilization pattern and cost of sedation, analgesia and neuromuscular blockade in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVES: To study the utilization pattern and the cost of sedatives, analgesics and neuromuscular blocking agents in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in the ICU of the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Trinidad and Tobago, for a period of twelve weeks. All patients admitted to the ICU were enrolled. No interventions were done. Data collected included demographics, diagnoses on admission, length of stay in the ICU, status of mechanical ventilation, patient outcome, quantity of sedatives, analgesics and neuromuscular blocking agents used in every patient and their cost. RESULTS: There were 333 patient-days encountered from 34 patients studied. Midazolam, fentanyl and cisatracurium were the most commonly used sedative, opioid and neuromuscular blocking agents respectively. The total cost of drugs used for sedation, analgesia and neuromuscular blockade was approximately US$ 19,600 per annum. Cost for this treatment alone accounted for more than 50% of the total ICU drug costs. The costs were significantly higher in patients who stayed more than two weeks in the ICU when compared to those who stayed less than two weeks (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the utilization pattern and financial burden of sedation, analgesia and neuromuscular blockade in the delivery of critical care.

A Markov computer simulation model of the economics of neuromuscular blockade in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is clinically challenging and costly. Neuromuscular blocking agents may facilitate mechanical ventilation and improve oxygenation, but may result in prolonged recovery of neuromuscular function and acute quadriplegic myopathy syndrome (AQMS). The goal of this study was to address a hypothetical question via computer modeling: Would a reduction in intubation time of 6 hours and/or a reduction in the incidence of AQMS from 25% to 21%, provide enough benefit to justify a drug with an additional expenditure of $267 (the difference in acquisition cost between a generic and brand name neuromuscular blocker)? METHODS: The base case was a 55 year-old man in the ICU with ARDS who receives neuromuscular blockade for 3.5 days. A Markov model was designed with hypothetical patients in 1 of 6 mutually exclusive health states: ICU-intubated, ICU-extubated, hospital ward, long-term care, home, or death, over a period of 6 months. The net monetary benefit was computed. RESULTS: Our computer simulation modeling predicted the mean cost for ARDS patients receiving standard care for 6 months to be $62,238 (5%-95% percentiles $42,259-$83,766), with an overall 6-month mortality of 39%. Assuming a ceiling ratio of $35,000, even if a drug (that cost $267 more) hypothetically reduced AQMS from 25% to 21% and decreased intubation time by 6 hours, the net monetary benefit would only equal $137. CONCLUSION: ARDS patients receiving a neuromuscular blocker have a high mortality, and unpredictable outcome, which results in large variability in costs per case. If a patient dies, there is no benefit to any drug that reduces ventilation time or AQMS incidence. A prospective, randomized pharmacoeconomic study of neuromuscular blockers in the ICU to asses AQMS or intubation times is impractical because of the highly variable clinical course of patients with ARDS.

Adverse responses: sedation, analgesia and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill children.

Advanced practice nurses (APNs) prescribe sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blocking agents in the management of critically ill children. Although most children are unscathed from the use of the medications, some suffer adverse responses. This article elucidates adverse responses to these medications for the APN, including withdrawal syndrome, muscle weakness, decreased gastric motility, corneal abrasions, and costs associated with these morbidities.

[Sedative practice in intensive care units results of a Maghrebian survey]. / Enquete Maghrebine multicentrique sur la sedation en reanimation.

OBJECTIVES: sedation is central to the management of intensive care patients. The aim of this study was to establish the current sedation practice in Maghrebian intensive care units (ICUs). The use of sedation policies with or without a written protocol, the use of scoring systems, the influence of costs on drug choice, the most common drugs for sedation and the use of neuromuscular blocking agents. METHODS: a self-administered questionnaire composed of 20 items was sent to 138 intensivists in the Maghreb working in 25 teaching hospitals and 16 private clinics. RESULTS: 50 of 138 questionnaires were returned (response rate = 36.2%). Midazolam and Fentanyl were the main sedative agents used (respectively 98% and 87%) less than 14% of the ICUs used the Propofol mainly in the first 48 hours. A sedation policy was adopted in 63.6% with a written protocol in 20% of cases. Sedation scoring systems were noted in 14.3% of cases (RAMSAY scale in 100%). Economic aspect was important for 64.6% of ICUs. DISCUSSION: sedation may seem secondary in the initial management of intensive care patients, only 63% of our respondents had a sedation policy and 20% a written protocol though its use is thought to improve outcome and reduce costs. Economic aspect was important for the choice of the drug to use (64%), this may explain the preferential use of Midazolam 98% in association with an analgesic (Fentanyl: 85%) while Propofol is used only in 14% though pharmacoeconomic studies may be in fact in favor of the latter. Neuromuscular blocking agents are less frequently used (16%) mainly because of the risk of complications.

A prospective audit of cost of sedation, analgesia and neuromuscular blockade in a large British ICU.

Bottom-up costs of sedative, analgesic and neuromuscular blocking drugs used in the intensive care unit have not been reported. We performed a prospective audit of the cost of these drugs using a bottom-up approach by prospectively recording the daily amount of drugs administered to patients over a 3-month period. Of 172 admissions, complete data were collected for 155 (92%). Propofol and alfentanil were the drugs most commonly used, being administered to 136 (88%) and 106 (68%) patients, respectively. The total cost was 14,070 pounds sterling, which was 81% of the pharmacy figure (based on central purchasing). Ninety-four per cent of the cost was for drugs administered to the 50% of patients who stayed in the intensive care unit longer than 48 h. The median (interquartile range [range]) cost per day was 9.30 pounds sterling (3.60-20.10 [0-61.20]). This represents less than 1% of reported total daily cost of intensive care per patient.

Cost comparisons of pharmacological strategies in open-heart surgery.

Open-heart surgery (OHS) is performed to bypass occluded arteries, replace malfunctioning cardiac valves or correct congenital abnormalities. The average cost of OHS varies from $US25 057-$US79 795 (1997 values). The objective of this paper was to review economic studies of pharmacological strategies in open-heart surgery. Pharmacological strategies studied include the prevention of postoperative complications such as atrial fibrillation (AF), bleeding and infection. Modifications in anaesthetic technique have been attempted by using agents that promote early extubation. In addition, strategies for postoperative management of sedation, analgesia and AF and use of neuromuscular blockers have also been compared. The majority of studies in this area have been cost analyses with few cost-effectiveness studies performed. Prophylaxis against AF with amiodarone is associated with a reduction in AF and was cost-neutral compared with placebo. Compared with placebo, prevention of bleeding with antifibrinolytics reduces transfusion costs. In direct comparative studies, lysine analogues, due to lower drug acquisition costs, offset transfusion costs to a greater extent than aprotinin. However, safety concerns with the lysine analogues remain. Erythropoietin decreases transfusion requirements and is cost effective compared with no intervention when the cost of postoperative bacterial complications is included. First- and second-generation cephalosporins prevent postoperative infections. Based on drug acquisition cost, the first-generation agents are less expensive although when administration costs are included, both classes have similar costs. Modifications in anaesthetic technique with short-acting anaesthetic agents, results in higher drug costs although nursing and total hospital costs are typically reduced. For neuromuscular blockers, drug acquisition costs are lowest with pancuronium but administration costs and the cost of adverse events have not been included in existing analyses. Midazolam provides an equivalent level of postoperative sedation to propofol but the acquisition cost is lower. The combined use of propofol and midazolam warrants further investigation, as its use is associated with lower sedative agent costs compared with either agent alone. There is limited data on the economics of postoperative analgesia and the management of AF. As the majority of studies to date are partial cost analyses, additional studies that include length of stay and other hospitalisation data are warranted. In future, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility studies, which incorporate quality of life and the cost of adverse effects and other longer term costs, should be undertaken.

The pharmacoeconomics of neuromuscular blocking drugs: a perioperative cost-minimization strategy in children.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the costs of intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs in children during routine ambulatory surgery. We studied 200 healthy, 2-10-yr-old children undergoing elective dental restorative surgery. During Part 1 of the study, children received an inhaled anesthetic with halothane and nitrous oxide, whereas in Part 2, the anesthetic was IV propofol with nitrous oxide. The study drugs were atracurium, cisatracurium, mivacurium, rocuronium, and vecuronium. Patients were initially administered 2x the effective dose for 95% of the study drug. After recovery to 10% of baseline neuromuscular function, the neuromuscular blockade was rigidly maintained with an infusion of the study drug at about 10% of baseline function. Neuromuscular drug costs were approximated as drug usage x cost/unit. The initial drug costs were not substantially different for both Parts 1 and 2, but over time, mivacurium became the most expensive drug and cisatracurium the least expensive. In conclusion, based on current costs, cisatracurium is the least expensive intermediate-acting neuromuscular drug. IMPLICATIONS: For children undergoing minor ambulatory procedures of 1-2 h, and continuous intraoperative neuromuscular blockade is indicated, cisatracurium currently is the least expensive drug.

Pharmacoeconomic issues related to selection of neuromuscular blocking agents.

Pharmacoeconomic issues related to the selection of neuromuscular blocking agents are described. Five models of economic analysis are commonly used in health care: cost-minimization, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-of-illness. The model used most commonly in anesthesiology is the cost-effectiveness model, in which outcomes are measured in nonmonetary terms that are then translated into units of success or failure. The true cost of anesthetic drugs and techniques should include more than acquisition cost. Factors typically included in economic analyses include resources used and humanistic factors. Six specific indirect costs should be included in pharmacoeconomic analyses of neuromuscular blocking agents: cost of residual muscle blockade, cost of prolonged time to extubation, inability of patients to resume normal activities because of postoperative myalgia, cost of additional postoperative monitoring for arrhythmia associated with reversal drugs, and risk of nausea and vomiting associated with reversal drugs. The availability of rapid-onset, shorter-duration anesthetics, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents with fewer adverse effects and the availability of less invasive surgical techniques have made it possible to accelerate the movement of patients in and out of the operating room and have shortened lengths of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and the intensive care unit (ICU). Decreased length of stay in the PACU and the ICU can save hundreds of dollars per case because these areas have high personnel costs. If reversal drugs like neostigmine can be avoided, fewer patients may experience postoperative nausea and vomiting and the resulting complications. In searching for the best outcome at the most reasonable cost, practitioners should look for meaningful cost reductions, bearing in mind that the use of newer, shorter-acting drugs has led to improved perioperative efficiency in clinical practice.

Effect of pharmaceutical services on adherence to criteria-for-use guidelines in the operating room.

Guidelines for the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) and sedatives during two- to four-hour surgical procedures were developed, and the effect of pharmacy presence on adherence to the guidelines was determined. Differences in cost per dose of the NMBAs pancuronium bromide, cisatracurium besylate, and vecuronium bromide were determined. Pancuronium was designated as the first-line agent in the NMBA guidelines, cisatracurium as the second-line agent, and vecuronium as the third-line agent. In the sedative guidelines, lorazepam was the first-line agent, midazolam was the second-line agent, and propofol was the third-line agent. Pharmacy presence in the operating room was provided during January 1997. The pharmacist made a preliminary decision about the most appropriate agent and encouraged guideline adherence. Cost and adherence data were compared with data for November 1996 and March 1997. During January, the NMBA guidelines were followed 75% of the time and the sedative guidelines were followed 15% of the time; the corresponding rates for March were 40% and 12%. Compared with November 1996, a saving of $5.61 per case was observed in January in the NMBA category and a saving of $2.77 was observed in March; between January and March, there was an increase of $2.84 per case. Pharmacy presence in the OR was associated with better adherence to criteria-for-use guidelines for NMBAs and sedatives; NMBA cost savings associated with implementation of the guidelines were higher when a pharmacist was present.

A two-center study evaluating the hemodynamic and pharmacodynamic effects of cisatracurium and vecuronium in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the hemodynamic and pharmacodynamic effects of rapid bolus administration of cisatracurium compared with vecuronium. DESIGN: A randomized, prospective, double-blind study. SETTING: Tertiary-care university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-nine adult patients with diagnosed coronary artery disease (CAD). INTERVENTION: Elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were randomly divided into four groups. Patients received a rapid bolus of two or four times the 95% peak depression of twitch (ED95) of either cisatracurium (groups 1 and 2) or vecuronium (groups 3 and 4). Three minutes after a midazolam induction, all patients received a rapid bolus administration of either study drug. Maintenance of anesthesia was with a standardized propofol-sufentanil-oxygen anesthetic. Patients were monitored with radial and pulmonary artery catheters and electromyography. End points of the study were hemodynamic stability at induction, after bolus administration of study drugs, and after intubation; the quality of intubating conditions; drug interventions to correct hemodynamic instability; the onset, duration, and recovery of neuromuscular function; and drug cost. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) decreased in a similar proportion in all four groups after induction while, following study drug administration, MAP and HR did not change significantly. Both cisatracurium groups required more boluses to maintain neuromuscular block, but spontaneous recovery rates were faster. Both agents, but cisatracurium to a lesser degree, showed increased duration with repeated maintenance doses. Both agents afforded good to excellent intubating conditions, but the cost of cisatracurium was significantly less. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude there is no evidence of a hemodynamic difference between the two neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs). There are some clinical and cost advantages in favor of cisatracurium.

Long-term pharmaceutical cost reduction using a data management system.

UNLABELLED: Cost containment is an important issue in medicine today, and the ability to control costs and maintain quality patient care presents a challenge to practitioners. Educating practitioners about drug costs has been identified as an effective method, but the benefits of education are usually short-lived. To evaluate the role of education in cost control, pharmaceutical use and performance improvement data were analyzed at a tertiary care institution during two time periods. A total of 4,530 anesthesia records and associated performance improvement data from March to June 1993 were analyzed as a baseline. These data were shared with the clinicians of an anesthesia department and used to educate practitioners regarding the costs and use of injectable pharmaceuticals and to identify areas in which cost savings could be achieved. The same information from 10,600 cases during January to October 1996 were compared with the early group. The expenditures for injectable pharmaceuticals to provide anesthesia were decreased by more than $30,000 per month, or $32 per case, without changing the performance indicators that were monitored, and has been maintained for >3 yr. IMPLICATIONS: By using a data management system, the cost for medications to provide anesthesia has been reduced without changing the quality of patient care.

The cost of sedating and paralyzing the critically ill patient.

The cost of health care is consuming an ever-increasing amount of United State's gross domestic product. It is estimated that 15% of health care dollars are spent in the ICU. Drugs used in the ICU account for approximately 10 to 15% of costs. Many of the sedatives, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents have high acquisition and indirect costs. Educating ICU practitioners on cost issues and key indications for these drugs not only may help with cost containment in the ICU but also can improve patient care.

Effect of prescribing guidelines on the use of neuromuscular blocking agents.

The effect of prescribing guidelines on the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBs) was studied. Voluntary guidelines on the appropriate prescribing of formulary NMBs in the operating rooms at a university hospital were approved in January 1993. Patients who underwent inpatient surgery with neuromuscular blockade during a preguideline period (March 1, 1992, through May 31, 1992) or a postguideline period (March 1, 1993, through May 31, 1993) were randomly selected (n = 200 per group) and compared to determine the relative appropriateness, effectiveness, safety, and cost of NMB use. The preguideline and post-guideline groups were demographically similar. There were significantly more instances of appropriate NMB use after than before the guidelines were established. Neuromuscular blockade was maintained inall patients. The overall rates of NMB-associated adverse events were 5.5% and 7.5% for the preguideline and postguideline groups, respectively. The acquisition cost of NMBs and drugs used to treat NMB-associated adverse events for the preguideline patients was $4261, versus $2978 for the postguideline patients. Extrapolated to the estimated 10,000 operations per year requiring neuromuscular blockade at the institution, the total cost was $213,000 before guideline introduction and $149,000 afterward, for a guideline-associated cost reduction of $64,000. Prescribing guidelines reduced expenditures for NMBs without affecting clinical outcomes.

Pancuronium infusion for neuromuscular block in children in the pediatric intensive care unit.

When neuromuscular blockade becomes necessary in the intensive care unit, there are several options available in regard to both the drug and the mode of delivery (continuous versus intermittent administration). Despite extensive experience with intermediate acting drugs such as atracurium or vecuronium, these muscle relaxants are costly and may account for a significant portion of the pharmacy charges. We undertook an open label study to evaluate the efficacy and dosing requirements for a less costly drug, pancuronium. The study group included 25 patients ranging in age from 3 mo to 17 yr and in weight from 3.2 to 68 kg. If the patient had not previously received neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), pancuronium was administered as a bolus dose of 0.1 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 mg.kg-1.h-1. A nerve stimulator was applied to either the ulnar or peroneal nerve and a standard train-of-four (TOF) was monitored every 2 h. In patients that had previously received other NMBAs, no bolus dose of pancuronium was administered and the infusion was started at 0.05 mg.kg-1.h-1. The pancuronium infusion was increased or decreased by increments of 0.01 mg.kg-1.h-1 to maintain one to two twitches of the TOF. In patients that required an increase in the infusion rate, an additional bolus dose equivalent to the current hourly rate was administered and then followed by the increase in the infusion rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Price stickers do not alter drug usage.

Anaesthetists choose daily among wide varieties of neuromuscular blocking drugs and rapidly acting hypnotic agents. This study sought to determine whether definitive, immediate knowledge of drug cost might influence clinician choices, ultimately reducing the cost of anaesthesia care. Faculty anaesthetists, residents in training, and nurse anaesthetists served as subjects in this prospective, sequential, blinded study of prescribing habits. Weekly inventories of selected neuromuscular blocking and rapidly acting hypnotic agents were performed over 24 wk at a tertiary-care hospital. Supermarket style price stickers plainly indicating the hospital cost of each unit of drug appeared continually for 13 wk following an initial 11 wk control period. Both actual usage data in priced units as well as data normalized by total anaesthesia duration underwent comparison between control and priced periods. The usage of pancuronium, vecuronium, atracurium, mivacurium, succinylcholine, thiopentone, etomidate, and propofol did not differ in the control from the priced periods. Pipecuronium decreased after sticker placement (2 vs 1 vials.wk-1 median, P < 0.05), as did methohexitone (39 +/- 9.0 [SD] vs 29 +/- 11 syringes.wk-1, P < 0.05). Ketamine usage normalized by total anaesthesia duration increased (P < 0.05) following sticker placement. The weekly cost of all drugs inventoried normalized for caseload did not differ during the measurement periods. Immediate cost awareness, implemented simply as price stickers on drug units, had minimal impact on clinicians' drug usage in a tertiary care setting.