Colectomy subtypes, follow-up surgical procedures, postsurgical complications, and medical charges among ulcerative colitis patients with private health insurance in the United States.

BACKGROUND: We describe colectomy subtypes, follow-up surgical and diagnostic procedures, complications, and direct medical charges occurring within 180 days of colectomy among privately insured patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of an insurance claims database for 2001-2005. We identified patients with a diagnosis of UC and no concurrent diagnosis of Crohn's disease who underwent colectomy. Colectomy types were classified as: 1) total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), 2) subtotal colectomy (SC) with ileostomy and Hartmann pouch or ileorectal anastomosis, 3) TPC with ileostomy, and 4) partial colectomy (PC). Follow-up surgical and diagnostic procedures and complications were collected. We developed estimates for UC-related charges for hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and medications for the time period 180 days before and after colectomy. RESULTS: A total of 55,934 UC patients were identified, of whom 540 had a colectomy and at least 180 days of pre- and postcolectomy follow-up. The colectomy distribution was: TPC-IPAA, 44%; SC-ileostomy, 22%; TPC-ileostomy, 17%; and PC, 17%. Within 180 days after colectomy, 54% of patients had a second colectomy-related surgery, and 27% had a follow-up diagnostic procedure. Complications following colectomy for UC included: abscesses (11.5% early / 14.6% late), sepsis/pneumonia/bacteremia (9.3% early / 10.0% late), and fistulas (3.9% early / 8.3% late). The mean UC-related direct medical charge for the 180 days following and including initial colectomy was $90,445. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of privately insured UC patients, we observed frequent follow-up surgical/diagnostic procedures, identified several complications postcolectomy, and estimated substantial charges 6 months pre- and postcolectomy.

Prevalence and management of prolapse of the ileoanal pouch.

PURPOSE: Known late complications of ileal pouch-anal anastomoses include chronic pouchitis, poor pouch function, or stricture. These may jeopardize the pouch and may require pouch salvage procedures. Prolapse of the ileoanal pouch is a little-known complication infrequently noted in the literature. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of this problem and identify approaches used to correct it and salvage the pouch. METHODS: The literature was reviewed for publications describing the diagnosis and treatment of patients with ileoanal pouch prolapse. A survey inquiring about experience with ileoanal pouch prolapse was sent to all North American members and fellows of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The survey assessed the number of years that the respondent had been performing ileal pouch-anal anastomoses and the number and type of pouches constructed. The respondents indicated the prevalence of patients with ileoanal pouch prolapse in their practices and length of time from pouch creation to onset of prolapse. They also were asked to indicate presenting symptoms, need for and method of surgical repair, and outcome. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine responses were received (response rate, 19.5 percent). Thirty-five respondents indicated that they had assisted in the care of a total of 83 patients with prolapse of the ileoanal pouch. Prolapse symptoms included external prolapse of tissue, sense of obstructed defecation, seepage, and pain. Patients with pouch prolapse most commonly presented within two years of pouch construction. Fifty-two patients required surgery and were managed by a combination of transanal repair, abdominal pouchpexy, and transabdominal revision or removal. The ileoanal pouch was salvaged in all but one case. CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of pouch prolapse is relatively low in this survey, the number of cases reported far exceeds the previous known experience. The possibility of this clinical entity should be considered in the differential diagnosis of ileoanal pouch dysfunction. Such recognition should lead to correction of prolapse and pouch salvage in the great majority of patients.