Comparison of two different caries risk assessment tools for infants and toddlers - A cross-sectional study.

CONTEXT: One of the essential components for successful caries management is caries risk assessment (CRA). Among CRA tools (CRATs) published in the literature: Caries management by risk assessment (CAMBRA) 123 and American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) CRATs are specifically designed for infants and toddlers. AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare readily available internationally accepted CRAT for infants and toddlers and check the usability of these tools in assigning caries risk among the Indian population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted at Baby Oral Health Promotion Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, Tertiary Care Hospital using a cross-sectional study design. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data were collected using CAMBRA 123 and AAPD CRATs from 379 children aged 0-6 years. The caries risk of the children was recorded with each CRAT and a comparison was made between the two tools used. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient were used to know the agreement between the CAMBRA 123 and AAPD CRATs using the SPSS statistical tool. The significance level was set at 5% (α = 0.05). RESULTS: For children aged <2 years, the study showed slight agreement between the CAMBRA 123 and AAPD, whereas, for children more than 2 years, there was a fair agreement between the two methods which was statistically significant. This indicates that the agreement between the two methods is still not perfectly established, and AAPD CRA assigns a higher risk category than CAMBRA 123. CONCLUSIONS: CAMBRA 123 is a promising user-friendly quantitative method for CRA in clinical practice. Since there is ambiguity in assessing the caries risk in children <2 years, there is a need to establish a CRAT that can be used exclusively for children below 2 years.

Caries risk assessment by Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) Protocol among the general population of Pakistan-a multicenter analytical study.

Background: Caries risk (CR) assessment tools are used to properly identify individuals with caries risk and to improve preventive procedures and programs. A tool such as CAMBRA determines the precise protective factors of caries and identifies an individual's specific therapeutic intervention. The purpose of this study was to assess the caries risk using the CAMBRA protocol among the general population of Pakistan. Methods: This multicentre analytical study was conducted in ten dental hospitals in different provinces of Pakistan and the caries risk assessment was carried out using a questionnaire that was designed using the Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) protocol. All 521 participants were intra-orally examined to assess oral hygiene status and the presence of disease. Multiple logistic regression test was performed for analysis. Results: A higher number of participants (61.2%) were found to be in the moderate risk category of caries risk assessment. The males are 51% less likely to have caries compared to the females (AOR = 0.49, P = 0.081). The majority of participants (71.3%) had one or more disease indicators, with white spots and visible cavities. Those with visible, heavy plaque were 13.9 times more likely to have caries compared to those without (AOR = 13.92, P < 0.001). Those using calcium and phosphate during the last 6 months were 90% less likely to have caries compared to those not using them (AOR = 0.10, P < 0.001). There was no significant interaction between all eight risk factors retained in the final model (P > 0.05), the Hosmer and Lemeshow Test P < 0.001, classification accuracy = 87.1%, and AUC = 91.2%. Conclusion: The caries risk among the general population of Pakistan is moderate, with significant variation among age groups, education levels, and socioeconomic status.

Assessment of dental caries based on ICDAS and WHO criteria: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT/dmft) index recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), which measures the prevalence of caries based on the presence of cavitated caries lesions, is the most used dental caries index in epidemiological studies. Early diagnosis of noncavitated carious lesions enables preventive measures, which has the potential to prevent dental caries-related morbidity and reduce the financial burden associated with restorative or rehabilitative dental care. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) incorporates both the cavitated and noncavitated carious lesions with acceptable reliability. AIM: To compare dental caries prevalence based on ICDAS II and WHO criteria. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 362 children visiting People's Dental College and Hospital, Nayabazar, Kathmandu, Nepal to study dental caries prevalence based on the ICDAS II and WHO criteria. RESULTS: Among the study population, 290 (90.34%) and 169 (68.42%) children had dental caries in primary and permanent teeth according to the ICDAS II criteria, whereas according to WHO criteria, 267 (83.18%) and 107 (43.32%) had dental caries in primary and permanent teeth, respectively. The prevalence of dental caries was significantly higher (p < .001) according to ICDAS II criteria than the prevalence based on WHO criteria in both dentitions. CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant difference in dental caries prevalence between the ICDAS II and WHO methods of caries diagnosis. The presence of noncavitated carious lesions was alarming. To enable detection of early/noncavitated carious lesions, ICDAS II rather than WHO criteria of caries diagnosis may be a more a valuable tool.

[Assessment of carious dental lesions and treatment options: comparison of the knowledge of dental students and orthodontic assistants]. / Einschätzung von kariösen Zahnläsionen und Therapieoptionen: Vergleich der Kenntnisse von Studierenden der Zahnmedizin und AssistenzzahnärztInnen für Kieferorthopädie.

In order to optimize dental education, established procedures for caries diagnosis and therapy, such as the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS), should be integrated into the curriculum. In preparation, the level of knowledge of dental students on caries detection and management was surveyed in order to specifically address deficits in dental teaching. In addition, the data were compared with the knowledge of clinically experienced dentists. The results are presented in this report and possible consequences for dental teaching are discussed.Twenty-six sixth semester dental students and six assistant dentists at the Department of Orthodontics (Philipps University of Marburg, Germany) were available for the written survey during the winter semester 2018/2019. For 12 anonymized orthodontic patient cases, the clinical findings, caries risk, and adequate treatment were to be determined for each defined tooth. The consensus decision of two experienced dentists served as the reference value. As a result, agreement with the reference ranged from 40.7% to 51.3% for students and from 56.9% to 75.0% for assistant dentists. The extent of caries and the resulting necessary treatment were mostly underestimated.In addition to theoretical knowledge, clinical experience is another prerequisite for adequate caries diagnosis and its management. The underestimation of caries extent and necessary treatment should be taken into account when teaching content. Procedures such as the ICCMS should be integrated into the dental curriculum at an early stage, so that orthodontic patients can also receive effective care.

Assessment of early childhood caries using ICDAS and Snyder caries activity test among preschool children: a cross-sectional study.

The aim of the present study was to elucidate the correlation between the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and the Snyder caries activity test (SCAT) for the assessment of early dental caries in preschool children. Dental health status of 153 children aged 3-5 years was evaluated by oral examination. The ICDAS stage (enamel opacity stage to cavitated dentine caries stage (stages 1-6)) was assigned based on the evaluation of each tooth surface by a trained dentist based on the number of decayed (d) and filled teeth (ft). In this study, scores of d3-6t (t, teeth), d3-6s (s, tooth surface), d3-6ft and d3-6fs were the cut-off points for enamel caries, set to ICDAS code 3 (d3). SCAT score was assigned based on the acid production level of lactic acid bacteria in plaque (scores: 1-4). Linear correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between ICDAS and SCAT scores. The proportion of children for each of the dental caries status were as follows: d0, 46.4%; d1-2, 28.1%; d3-4, 9.8%; d5-6, 15.7%. Regarding SCAT scores, 30%, 30.1%, 26.8% and 12.4% children had no, mild, moderate and severe caries activity, respectively. The d3-6t, d3-6s, d3-6ft and d3-6fs indices increased with age and were 0.56, 0.82, 2.03 and 5.05, respectively. Children with a higher SCAT score had higher ICDAS scores (p < 0.05). Our findings suggest that a combination of ICDAS and SCAT scores is beneficial for diagnosing caries progression and highly active caries. Early childhood caries should be managed early to prevent the enamel opacity stage to progress to cavitation.

Development and initial validation of the Comprehensive Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Tool.

OBJECTIVES: Improving the oral health of the elderly is crucial to improving their general health and quality of life. To reach this goal, it is necessary to start with a comprehensive oral health assessment and a detailed treatment plan. The aim of this study was, therefore, to develop a comprehensive Oral Health Assessment Tool for the geriatric population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following a panel of experts' consultation, a clinical form and a self-assessment questionnaire were developed, encompassing eight domains: dental caries, periodontal diseases, partial and complete edentulism, oral soft tissue lesions, occlusion, xerostomia, temporomandibular joints, and oral or oral prostheses hygiene. Subsequently, a pilot study was conducted to appraise the clinical form and questionnaire involving 84 residents of an Iranian nursing home. After securing ethics approval, both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the self-assessment questions' validity and reliability were assessed, and specificity and sensitivity were calculated. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 69.8 (±4.1) years, and 86% had less than 12 years of education. The questions regarding the number of remaining teeth and the number of decayed teeth had the highest sensitivity (97% and 88%), respectively. Questions regarding the presence of periodontitis and gingivitis had the highest specificity (both 100%). CONCLUSIONS: A Comprehensive Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Tool has been developed and its validity and reliability evaluated in a pilot study. It should now be further evaluated in larger studies.

Cost-effectiveness of school-based caries screening using transillumination.

OBJECTIVES: School-based screening for caries lesions usually only employs visual-tactile detection means (standard of care). Near-infrared-light-transillumination (NILT) could be used to support school-based screening and to identify early proximal caries, facilitating referral and appropriate non- or micro-invasive management in dental practice. METHOD: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of NILT for school-based caries screening. A German mixed-payers' perspective was adopted. A Markov model was used to simulate the consequences of true and false positive and negative detections and the subsequent decisions over the lifetime of initially 12 years old patients. Our health outcome was tooth retention in years. Costs were measured in Euro 2020. Monte-Carlo-microsimulations, univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and the cost-effectiveness-acceptability at different willingness-to-pay-thresholds were quantified. RESULTS: NILT was minimally more effective (tooth retention for a mean (2.5-97.5%) 56 (53-59) years) and minimally less costly (515 (416-616) Euro) than standard of care (56 (50-59) years; 526 (427-628 Euro)). The ICER was -503 Euro/year, i.e. school-based caries screening using NILT saved money at higher effectiveness in the modelled population. The cost-effectiveness of NILT increased for payers with a willingness-to-pay for additional tooth retention time. The biggest driver of costs were (avoided) tooth replacements later in life. CONCLUSIONS: NILT-based screening is likely to yield limited effectiveness gains and cost savings in the modelled populations. In countries where regular practice-based screening of children is less common than in Germany, the cost-effectiveness of NILT for school-based caries screening is likely higher. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: NILT-based caries screening in German schools is unlikely to be cost-effective. In countries with different utilization patterns or generally higher caries prevalence and risk, this may differ.

Microcomputed Tomography Mineral Density Profile as Reference Standard for Early Carious Lesion Activity Assessment.

Early caries diagnosis is crucial to treatment decisions in dentistry and requires identification of lesion activity: whether a carious lesion is active (progressively demineralizing) or arrested (progressively remineralizing). This study aimed to identify microtomographic (micro-CT) differences between active and arrested smooth surface enamel lesions, to quantify those micro-CT differences by creating thresholds for ex vivo caries activity assessment to serve as a future reference standard, and to validate those thresholds against the remaining sample. Extracted human permanent teeth (n = 59) were selected for sound surfaces and non-cavitated smooth surface carious lesions. Each surface was then examined for caries activity by calibrated individuals via visual-tactile examination using the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS) activity criteria. Each tooth was scanned via micro-CT and the mineral density was plotted against lesion depth. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and represented the loss of density for the outermost 96 µm of enamel. AUC thresholds obtained from micro-CT were established to classify sound, remineralized, and demineralized surfaces against the gold standard examiner's lesion assessment of sound, inactive, and active lesions, respectively. The established AUC thresholds demonstrated moderate agreement with the assessment in identifying demineralized lesions (k = 0.45), with high sensitivity (0.73) and specificity (0.77). This study demonstrated quantifiable differences among demineralized lesions, remineralized lesions, and sound surfaces, which contributes to the establishment of micro-CT as a reference standard for caries activity that may be used to improve clinical and laboratorial dental caries evaluations.

Assessment of OXIS contacts-a comparison of three methods.

PURPOSE: To compare OXIS contacts by means of Replication using Sectional die Models (RSM) and Photographs of the Models (PM) with Direct Clinical Examination (DCE) in a sample of preschool children aged 3-4 years. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using existing records of sectional die models and their photographs among 4257 contacts of 1104 caries-free pre-school children. Two calibrated examiners scored the contacts between the distal surface of the primary first molar and mesial surface of the primary second molar using OXIS criteria from the occlusal view using the RSM & PM methods. These were compared to the OXIS scores from DCE method which was available from previous records. Kappa agreement was used to compare results obtained RSM and PM methods with DCE. RESULTS: The kappa agreement between the RSM and DCE methods was 98.48%; and between the PM and DCE methods was 99.42%, both of which indicated perfect agreement. CONCLUSION: The RSM and PM methods were found to have an excellent agreement in scoring OXIS contacts when compared to the DCE method. PM was found to be slightly more accurate than the RSM method for scoring OXIS contacts.

Chapter 8: Risk Assessment: Considerations for Coronal Caries.

Caries risk assessment (CRA) is essential to delivering personalized/precision care in caries management. Limited formal evaluation and validation of existing CRA tools affects the ability to accurately predict new lesions. However, this should not prevent clinicians from assessing modifiable risk factors to guide preventive measures and address individual needs to personalize care. Since caries is a multifactorial and dynamic disease process, CRA is complex and impacted by multiple variables throughout the life course, demanding periodic re-assessment. Many factors can influence caries risk at the individual, family, and community level; however, unfortunately, caries experience is still considered one of the greatest indicators of future risk for caries. CRA tools that are validated, inexpensive, and easy to use should be developed and prioritized to help support decision-making to implement evidence based, and minimally invasive caries management strategies for coronal caries lesions in children, adults, and older persons. Efforts into developing CRA tools should include evaluation and reporting of internal and external validation information. In the future, approaches using big data and artificial intelligence may drive risk predictions, and cost-effectiveness analyses may help derive the selection of appropriate risk thresholds for decision-making. Because of the importance of CRA in the treatment planning and decision-making process, challenges for implementation including how to communicate risk to drive behavior change, development of tools that are quick and easy to integrate seamlessly into the busy clinical flow, and reimbursement for the time needed to implement should be considered.

Accuracy of Two Visual Criteria for the Assessment of Caries around Restorations: A Delayed-Type Cross-Sectional Study.

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two visual criteria used for the detection of caries around restorations in permanent teeth. In this delayed-type cross-sectional study, the study sample was randomly allocated to one of two visual criteria for the assessment of restorations as follows: (a) International Dental Federation (FDI) criteria, considers marginal staining, marginal adaptation, and caries recurrence and (b) Caries Associated with Restorations or Sealants (CARS) criteria, defined by the International Caries Classification and Management System. A calibrated examiner assessed the restorations using two reference standards as follows: (i) for restorations requiring operative interventions (repair/replacement), the restoration was partially or totally removed and the presence or absence of carious tissue was assessed; and (ii) for restorations requiring nonoperative intervention, follow-up for a period of 1 year was recommended to allow identification of the presence of new lesions not detected at baseline. The sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (Az), and accuracy of the criteria were assessed. The study included 305 restorations. The FDI marginal staining parameter had the lowest Az value (Az = 0.501), while similar sensitivity was observed between the CARS (62.0%), FDI presence of caries (65.0%), and FDI marginal adaptation (74.0%) parameters. CARS exhibited the highest specificity (88.3%) and accuracy (85.6%). The CARS criteria exhibited better specificity and accuracy in detecting caries around restorations, followed by the FDI criteria for caries recurrence and marginal adaptation. Considering marginal staining or combining multiple marginal features to assess secondary caries resulted in an increased risk of false-positive outcomes and overtreatment.

[Diagnostic Prevalence of Dental Findings in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Mental Disorders Compared to Healthy People - an Analysis and Estimation Based on Claims Data from 2019]. / Zahnmedizinische Diagnoseprävalenzen bei Kindern, Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen mit psychischen Störungen im Vergleich zu Gesunden-Analyse und Abschätzung kassenärztlicher Abrechnungsdaten (2019).

AIM: To analyse oral health-related diagnostic prevalences in children, adolescents (KiJu), young adults with mental/behavioural disorders (PEVS) and those of the general population in Germany based on claims data. METHOD: Anonymously provided ZI (Zentralinstitut)-data sets of GKV-insured persons (0-44 years) were i. e. stratified according to gender, age groups, ICD-K00-K14 diagnosis. RESULT: No reliable oral or dental health-related information was generated from the requested data set. Regardless of the F diagnosis, according to the data set, 1.8% of all 11,854,384 KiJu-GKV-insured persons and 0.2% of 18-44-year-olds (23,348,399 GKV-insured persons) had a diagnosis related to the dental hard tissue (ICD-10 K02/K03.2). Based on available literature on the prevalence of caries in KiJu with PEVS, a mean unweighted prevalence of 51% can be assumed. According to the available literature on the prevalence of caries in KiJu with PEVS a mean unweighted prevalence of 51% can be calculated. Following this and the diagnosis prevalence of PEVS in 0- to 17-year-olds from 2017, an estimated 957.952 children with PEVS should also have a caries. CONCLUSION: The nationwide data on the prevalence of oral health-related diagnoses made by physicians in the general population and in people of the same age with PEVS are very low. Apparently, dental diagnoses are only given very rarely by general practitioners and paediatricians, among others. The existing literature as well as the clinical experience of the authors indicate that this claim data is not suitable to realistically represent the dental and oral health of the examined group of people. Thus, for networking, the improvement of health care research and the care, e. g. of subgroups of the society, is an interprofessional dental/medical, data protection-compliant central database to be driven forward.

Caries experience scores revisited for caries risk assessment using cariogram model - A cross-sectional study.

Context: The widely accepted caries risk assessment tools such as the Cariogram model needs modifications in the scoring of different factors for reliable results. Aims: The study was aimed to report the caries experience in 3-60 years of the Rajasthan population and to apply the newly derived average decayed exfoliated filled teeth/Decayed Missing Filled Teeth (deft/DMFT) scores in the Cariogram model to assess the caries risk. Settings and Design: The cross-sectional study was planned in the Department of Dentistry and a total of 500 participants were equally divided into five groups (3-6, 7-12, 13-30, 31-44, and 45-60 years) were included. Methods and Material: All participants were examined for caries detection using deft/DMFT, ICDAS, and CAST indices according to the predefined protocol. A single examiner evaluated the participants in a dental operatory and data was recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's Post-Hoc tests were used to evaluate the significant difference between the groups of each caries index. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean deft/DMFT and CAST scores of 3-6, 7-12, and 13-30 age groups with the 45-60 years age group. Caries prevalence was highest (83%) in 31-44 and 45-60 year age groups and lowest (51%) in the 3-6 year age group. Conclusions: Caries experience scores increase as the age increases and the highest scores were observed in 31-44 and 45-60 year age groups and the lowest were observed in the 3-6 year age group. The average ICDAS and CAST scores were higher when compared to the deft/DMFT index.

Oral hygiene knowledge versus behavior in children: A questionnaire-based, interview-style analysis and on-site assessment of toothbrushing practices.

OBJECTIVES: Oral hygiene plays an important role in eliminating biofilms and preventing dental caries. However, the implementation of oral health knowledge that children learn from their parents and through school dental health programmes remains poorly studied. This study aimed to investigate oral hygiene knowledge and its practical utilization in children and young adolescents (CYAs) aged 2-15 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a questionnaire-based, interview-style community survey and on-site practical assessment of CYAs' toothbrushing skills conducted during two 1-day public science-promoting events held at a major German university hospital in consecutive years. CYAs first answered questions on toothbrushing frequency, dental aids used, and dental care. They subsequently underwent diagnostic staining and demonstrated their brushing technique and method. CYAs' responses (percentages) to questionnaire items addressing oral hygiene knowledge and practice, and on-site assessment of toothbrushing skills served as the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Of 244 participating CYAs, 178 (73%) CYAs had no caries experience, the percentage increasing with age from 5% in 2-5-year-olds to 40% in those aged > 10 years. Of 117/244 (48%) indicating that teeth should be brushed three times daily, 80/117 (68%) self-reported twice-daily brushing, 32/117 (27%) reported brushing three times, and 4/117 (3%) stated doing so only once. Although 131/244 (54%) considered that teeth should be brushed for 3 min, 77/131 (59%) self-reported actually doing so and 41/131 (31%) reported brushing for 2min. Seventeen of 42 (40%) participants aged > 10 years showed no systematic brushing method, with 21/42 (50%) failing to clean their teeth completely. Participants aged 6-10 years exhibited the highest proportion (97/134, 72%) of complete cleaning. One hundred and forty-six of 244 (60%) of CYAs knew about floss; 63/134 (43%) reported using it. Good adherence to oral health recommendations (i.e., brushing ≥ 2/day for ≥2min) was observed in 212/244 (87%) CYAs, the remaining 32/244 (13%) exhibiting poor adherence. CONCLUSION: CYAs knew about the importance of oral hygiene and cleaned their teeth frequently. However, translation of their knowledge into practice showed deficiencies. Repeated encouragement to put oral health knowledge into practice is important.

Detection of Cavitated Proximal Carious Lesions in Permanent Teeth: A Visual and Radiographic Assessment.

Detection of proximal carious lesions involves the combination of clinical and radiographic methods, both with inherent difficulties. The present cross-sectional study is aimed at estimating the prevalence of cavitation in proximal carious lesions, based on a direct clinical assessment of previously detected radiographic lesions, in permanent molars and premolars. Proximal dental surfaces were radiographically evaluated using the ADA coding system and cavitation was determined through clinical visual examination of the surfaces after separation with elastomeric bands. One-hundred and twenty-six patients attending the dental clinics at the University of Talca were examined, comprising 508 proximal surfaces with radiographic codes ranging from E1 to D3. Two examiners were trained and calibrated for radiographic and clinical detection of proximal lesions. Most participants were females (61.9%). The age mean of participants was 28.7 (0.8) years old. A total of 22.2% of the examined surfaces were cavitated. Only few lesions coded as E1 (n = 4; 2.1%) and E2 (n = 9; 9.8%) were cavitated. Fifty D1 (35.5%) and 22 D2 (41.5%) lesions were cavitated after separation. Most lesions coded as D3 (n = 28; 84.8%) were cavitated. The multilevel binary regression model (p = 0.003) demonstrated that sex, age, jaw, tooth type, surface, and side were not associated with the likelihood of having proximal cavitation. Challenging conventional wisdom, most D1 and D2 lesions were not cavitated. Combining detection methods seems desirable to increase the accuracy in assessing approximal posterior lesions. The low proportion of cavitated lesions reinforces the idea of cautiously indicating invasive approaches for managing proximal carious lesions.

Assessment of caries diagnostic thresholds of DMFT, ICDAS II and CAST in the estimation of caries prevalence rate in first permanent molars in early permanent dentition-a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The actual burden of dental caries prevalence varies with the caries assessment tool used. Therefore, the present study evaluated the caries diagnostic potentials of Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT); International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II and Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) indices in estimating the caries prevalence rate of first permanent molar (FPM) in Saudi male children aged 7-9 years. METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 390 children by multistage stratified cluster sampling method in Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia. The prevalence rates of FPM caries were determined by DMFT, ICDAS II and CAST indices at various diagnostic cut-off points. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability was determined. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of FPM caries determined by DMFT (decayed), ICDAS II (codes 1-6) and CAST (codes 3-7) were 64.4% (61.6-67.2), 71.5% (69.2-73.2) and 71.0% (68.7-73.3), respectively. The prevalence rates of FPM caries determined by ICDAS II at various diagnostic cut-offs were as follows: 'sound' (code '0'), 28.5% (26.3-30.8); 'enamel caries' (codes 1-3), 57.2% (54.7-59.7) and 'dentinal caries' (codes 4-6), 14.3% (12.6-16.1). Similarly, the prevalence rates estimated by CAST at different diagnostic cut-off points were: 'healthy' (scores 0-2), 28.1% (25.9-30.4); 'premorbid' (score 3, enamel carious), 56.5% (54.0-59.0); 'morbid' (scores 4-5, cavitated carious dentin), 7.9% (6.6-9.3); 'severe morbidity' (scores 6-7, pulp exposure/fistula/abscess), 6.6% (5.4-8.1) and 'mortality' (score 8, lost), 0.8% (0.4-1.4). CONCLUSION: Enamel caries lesions were found in more than half of the FPMs investigated in the current study. CAST index is preferable because it detects the complete spectrum of caries. ICDAS II at codes 1-6 and CAST at codes 3-7 projected similar caries prevalence rates in FPMs.

Developing diagnostic skills from preclinical dental education: Caries detection and assessment using e-learning assisted practice.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of developing visual diagnostic skills for detecting and assessing dental caries using e-learning assisted practice in preclinical dental education. METHODS: A one-group before and after the study was conducted. After a theoretical lesson on cariology, 53 inexperienced second-year preclinical students assessed 78 clinical photographs using the Nyvad criteria; they received automated feedback upon completion of the test. After a week, all students reassessed the same set of photographs, which were randomly reordered. Differential diagnostic accuracy was analyzed category-pairwise, and overall accuracy measures were based on the receiver operator curve. Diagnostic accuracy in both attempts was evaluated and compared through estimation and pooling of individual student accuracies. RESULTS: Pooled category-pairwise accuracy was lower for discriminating Sound surface from Non-cavitated-active caries, and for discriminating inactive caries (surface discontinuity) from intact surface inactive caries and Cavitated-active caries. Pooled overall accuracy, after the theoretical lesson, was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.81), and it increased to 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) after feedback. Between-student variability in accuracy was reduced from I2  = 0.66 to 0.55. CONCLUSION: E-learning assisted practice is a feasible alternative to start developing visual diagnostic skills for detecting and assessing dental caries using the Nyvad criteria from preclinical dental education in cariology. However, further studies are required to evaluate its effectiveness in improving real-world practice knowledge and skills.

Cost-effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence as a Decision-Support System Applied to the Detection and Grading of Melanoma, Dental Caries, and Diabetic Retinopathy.

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) for supporting clinicians in detecting and grading diseases in dermatology, dentistry, and ophthalmology. Importance: AI has been referred to as a facilitator for more precise, personalized, and safer health care, and AI algorithms have been reported to have diagnostic accuracies at or above the average physician in dermatology, dentistry, and ophthalmology. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation analyzed data from 3 Markov models used in previous cost-effectiveness studies that were adapted to compare AI vs standard of care to detect melanoma on skin photographs, dental caries on radiographs, and diabetic retinopathy on retina fundus imaging. The general US and German population aged 50 and 12 years, respectively, as well as individuals with diabetes in Brazil aged 40 years were modeled over their lifetime. Monte Carlo microsimulations and sensitivity analyses were used to capture lifetime efficacy and costs. An annual cycle length was chosen. Data were analyzed between February 2021 and August 2021. Exposure: AI vs standard of care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Association of AI with tooth retention-years for dentistry and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for individuals in dermatology and ophthalmology; diagnostic costs. Results: In 1000 microsimulations with 1000 random samples, AI as a diagnostic-support system showed limited cost-savings and gains in tooth retention-years and QALYs. In dermatology, AI showed mean costs of $750 (95% CI, $608-$970) and was associated with 86.5 QALYs (95% CI, 84.9-87.9 QALYs), while the control showed higher costs $759 (95% CI, $618-$970) with similar QALY outcome. In dentistry, AI accumulated costs of €320 (95% CI, €299-€341) (purchasing power parity [PPP] conversion, $429 [95% CI, $400-$458]) with 62.4 years per tooth retention (95% CI, 60.7-65.1 years). The control was associated with higher cost, €342 (95% CI, €318-€368) (PPP, $458; 95% CI, $426-$493) and fewer tooth retention-years (60.9 years; 95% CI, 60.5-63.1 years). In ophthalmology, AI accrued costs of R $1321 (95% CI, R $1283-R $1364) (PPP, $559; 95% CI, $543-$577) at 8.4 QALYs (95% CI, 8.0-8.7 QALYs), while the control was less expensive (R $1260; 95% CI, R $1222-R $1303) (PPP, $533; 95% CI, $517-$551) and associated with similar QALYs. Dominance in favor of AI was dependent on small differences in the fee paid for the service and the treatment assumed after diagnosis. The fee paid for AI was a factor in patient preferences in cost-effectiveness between strategies. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that marginal improvements in diagnostic accuracy when using AI may translate into a marginal improvement in outcomes. The current evidence supporting AI as decision support from a cost-effectiveness perspective is limited; AI should be evaluated on a case-specific basis to capture not only differences in costs and payment mechanisms but also treatment after diagnosis.

Cost-effectiveness of AI for caries detection: randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of AI-supported detection of proximal caries in a randomized controlled clustered cross-over superiority trial. METHODS: Twenty-three dentists were sampled to assess 20 bitewings; 10 were randomly evaluated supported by an AI-based software (dentalXrai Pro 1.0.4, dentalXrai Ltd, Berlin, Germany) and the other 10 without AI support. The reference test had been established by four independent experts and an additional review. We evaluated the proportion of true and false positive and negative detections and the treatment decisions assigned to each detection (non-invasive, micro-invasive, invasive). Cost-effectiveness was assessed using a mixed public-private-payer perspective in German healthcare. Using the accuracy and treatment decision data from the trial, a Markov simulation model was populated and posterior permanent teeth in initially 31-years old individuals followed over their lifetime. The model allowed extrapolation from the initial detection and therapy to treatment success, re-treatments and, eventually, tooth loss and replacement, capturing long-term effectiveness (tooth retention) and costs (cumulative in Euro). Costs were estimated using the German public and private fee catalogues. Monte-Carlo microsimulations were used and incremental cost-effectiveness at different willingness-to-pay ceiling thresholds assessed. RESULTS: In the trial, AI-supported detection was significantly more sensitive than detection without AI. However, in the AI group, lesions were more often treated invasively. As a result, AI and no AI showed identical effectiveness (tooth retention for a mean (2.5-97.5%) 49 (48-51) years) and nearly identical costs (AI: 330 (250-409) Euro, no AI: 330 (248-410) Euro). 41% simulations found AI and 43% no AI to be more cost-effective. The resulting cost-effectiveness remained uncertain regardless of a payer's willingness-to-pay. CONCLUSIONS: Higher accuracy of AI did not lead to higher cost-effectiveness, as more invasive treatment approaches generated costs and diminished possible effectiveness advantages. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The cost-effectiveness of AI could be improved by supporting not only caries detection, but also subsequent management.

Assessment of oral health status in a Ghanaian population: rationale, methods, and population characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Oral health surveys aid in estimating the oral health of a population and provide a projection for future oral health care needs. We report the procedures and rationale of a survey carried out to assess the oral health status and risk factors for oral disease among adults in the Greater Accra Region (GAR) of Ghana. The objective was to provide prevalence estimates on dental diseases, oral health behaviour and risk factors, and to establish baseline epidemiological data on the population's oral health for further research. METHODS: This was a population-based cross-sectional study of adults aged 25 years and above. A random, stratified two-stage sampling method was used to select participants from rural and urban communities in three types of districts (Metropolitan, Municipal, Ordinary). A semi- structured questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics, oral health behaviours and risk factors for oral disease. Anthropometric data and a full-mouth clinical examination was carried out including: soft tissue assessment, tooth count, prosthodontic status, dental caries assessment and periodontal assessment. RESULTS: A total of 729 participants were included in the study with a mean age of 43.9 years (SD 14.6). Majority 425 (61.0%) were females. Though the metropolitan districts had more dental clinics and personnel, along with better health insurance coverage, they had a higher prevalence of missing teeth, retained roots, severe periodontitis and poorer oral health coverage. The findings also show some significant differences in disease prevalence, within the different localities and districts. CONCLUSIONS: Availability and access to oral health services is not the most important determinant of good oral health outcomes in this region. We recommend exploring socio-behavioral and cultural factors as well. This study provides district level data to inform policy and guide further research.