Self-Assessment of Cochlear Health by New Cochlear Implant Recipients: Daily Impedance, Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Electrocochleography Measurements Over the First Three Postoperative Months.

HYPOTHESES: In newly implanted cochlear implant (CI) users, electrically evoked compound action (eCAPs) and electrocochleography (ECochGs) will remain stable over time. Electrode impedances will increase immediately postimplantation due to the initial inflammatory response, before decreasing after CI switch-on and stabilizing thereafter. BACKGROUND: The study of cochlear health (CH) has several applications, including explaining variation in CI outcomes, informing CI programming strategies, and evaluating the safety and efficacy of novel biological treatments for hearing loss. Very early postoperative CH patterns have not previously been intensively explored through longitudinal daily testing. Thanks to technological advances, electrode impedances, eCAPs, and ECochGs can be independently performed by CI users at home to monitor CH over time. METHODS: A group of newly implanted CI users performed daily impedances, eCAPs, and ECochGs for 3 months at home, starting from the first day postsurgery (N = 7) using the Active Insertion Monitoring system by Advanced Bionics. RESULTS: Measurement validity of 93.5, 93.0, and 81.6% for impedances, eCAPs, and ECochGs, respectively, revealed high participant compliance. Impedances increased postsurgery before dropping and stabilizing after switch-on. eCAPs showed good stability, though statistical analyses revealed a very small but significant increase in thresholds over time. Most ECochG thresholds did not reach the liberal signal-to-noise criterion of 2:1, with low threshold stability over time. CONCLUSION: Newly implanted CI recipients can confidently and successfully perform CH recordings at home, highlighting the valuable role of patients in longitudinal data collection. Electrode impedances and eCAPs are promising objective measurements for evaluating CH in newly implanted CI users.

Automatic electrode scalar location assessment after cochlear implantation using a novel imaging software.

As of today, image-based assessment of cochlear implant electrode array location is not part of the clinical routine. Low resolution and contrast of computer tomography (CT) imaging, as well as electrode array artefacts, prevent visibility of intracochlear structures and result in low accuracy in determining location of the electrode array. Further, trauma assessment based on clinical-CT images requires a uniform image-based trauma scaling. Goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel imaging software to detect electrode scalar location. Six cadaveric temporal bones were implanted with Advanced Bionics SlimJ and Mid-Scala electrode arrays. Clinical-CT scans were taken pre- and postoperatively. In addition, micro-CTs were taken post-operatively for validation. The electrode scalar location rating done by the software was compared to the rating of two experienced otosurgeons and the micro-CT images. A 3-step electrode scalar location grading scale (0 = electrode in scala tympani, 1 = interaction of electrode with basilar membrane/osseous spiral lamina, 2 = translocation of electrode into scala vestibuli) was introduced for the assessment. The software showed a high sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.7% for rating the electrode location. The correlation between rating methods was strong (kappa > 0.890). The software gives a fast and reliable method of evaluating electrode scalar location for cone beam CT scans. The introduced electrode location grading scale was adapted for assessing clinical CT images.

Novel Multiportal Approach to the Internal Auditory Canal for Hearing-Preserving Surgery: Feasibility Assessment in Dissections.

OBJECTIVE: State-of-the-art, minimally invasive endoscopic transcanal surgery of the internal auditory canal (IAC) sacrifices the cochlea with complete hearing loss. With a combination of the transcanal infracochlear and transmastoid retrolabyrinthine approaches, we aim to preserve hearing and enable minimally invasive surgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma. In this study, we investigate the anatomical indications and the feasibility of both approaches in dissections, in human whole head specimens. METHODS: We operated whole head anatomical specimens with a four-handed technique, using the retrolabyrinthine approach as the main surgical corridor and the infracochlear approach for endoscopic visualization. We tested 4 different powered surgical systems. We collected intraoperative data on the size of the access windows, the surgical freedom, and the exposed area of the IAC. Finally, we evaluated the outcome in postoperative computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Six out of 14 sides were anatomically suitable and qualified for the surgery based on preoperative computed tomography. In all attempted sides, the IAC could be reached and opened, leaving the ossicular chain and the labyrinth intact. 51%-75% of the length and 22%-40% of the circumference of the IAC could be exposed. All tested instruments were beneficial at different stages of the surgery. The four-handed technique enabled good maneuverability of the instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The combined multiportal approach to the IAC is feasible with a good surgical exposure and full anatomical preservation of hearing. State-of-the-art surgical instruments in specimens with suitable anatomy are sufficient to perform this approach.

A new method of preoperative assessment of correct electrode array alignment based on post-operative measurements in a cochlear implanted cohort.

PURPOSE: During cochlear implantation surgery, a range of complications may occur such as tip fold-over. We recently developed a method to estimate the insertion orientation of the electrode array. The aim of the study was to determine the optimal angle of orientation in a cohort of cochlear implanted patients. METHODS: On eighty-five CT scans (80 uncomplicated insertions and 5 cases with tip fold-over), location of the electrode array's Insertion Guide (IG), Orientation marker (OM) and two easily identifiable landmarks (the round window (RW) and the incus short process (ISP)) were manually marked. The angle enclosed by ISP-RW line and the Cochlear™ Slim Modiolar electrode array's OM line determined the electrode array insertion angle. RESULTS: The average insertion angle was 45.0-47.2° ± 10.4-12° SD and was validated with 98% confidence interval. Based on the measurements obtained, patients' sex and age had no impact on the size of this angle. Although the angles of the tip fold-over cases (44.9°, 46.9°, 34.2°, 54.3°, 55.9°) fell within this average range, the further it diverted from the average it increased the likelihood for tip fold-over. CONCLUSION: Electrode array insertion in the individually calculated angle relative to the visible incus short process provides a useful guide for the surgeon when aiming for the optimal angle, and potentially enhances good surgical outcomes. Our results show that factors other than the orientation angle may additionally contribute to failures in implantation when the Slim Modiolar electrode is used.

Utility and value of pre-operative CT and MRI for cochlear implantation in the elderly.

PURPOSE: To determine the utility and value of pre-operative imaging among the elderly population ≥70 y.o. with bilateral progressive sensorineural hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional review was performed at a tertiary referral center between 2010 and 2018 including patients ≥70 y.o. with bilateral presbycusis who underwent preoperative imaging and cochlear implantation. Primary outcome was whether pre-operative imaging changed the surgeon's surgical plan such as side of implant or abort procedure entirely. Patient characteristics including age, sex, side of implant, imaging modality, whether imaging changed surgical plan, and surgical complications were reviewed. One-way analysis of variance with post-hoc tests using the Bonferroni and Fisher's exact test were used to examine differences between groups. Secondary outcome was cost of preoperative imaging. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients (mean age 79.38 [5.51 SD]) who underwent a total of 142 surgical cases and 147 total scans. There were 92, 27, and 14 patients who underwent CT, MRI, or both, respectfully (n=133). Of the 142 implants that were placed, preoperative imaging did not reveal a contraindication to placing implant on one side over another. Total cost of imaging was $29,694. Estimated cost if 20% of cochlear implant eligible patients ≥70 y.o. underwent imaging is $7,763,490. CONCLUSION: Decreasing unnecessary preoperative imaging can potentially decrease cost in cochlear implantation. In this sample, preoperative imaging did not affect the surgeon's choice of which side to operate on. However, imaging may provide an anatomic roadmap and contribute to either surgical confidence or caution. With the increasing amount of cochlear implant eligible elderly adults, preoperative imaging needs to be more clearly defined in this unique population.

Assessment of Angular Insertion-Depth of Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Plain X-ray Scans.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in cochlear implant patients, the feasibility and reliability of angular depth of insertion (aDOI) measurements using plain x-ray scans. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study where three observers independently evaluated and compared intraoperative anterior-posterior and oblique x-ray scans. SETTING: A tertiary pediatric medical center. PATIENTS: Included were 50 children (100 ears) who underwent bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation during 2008 to 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater agreement of aDOI measured in plain x-ray scans; effect of head position on measured aDOI; and symmetry of aDOI between patients' ears in bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantations. RESULTS: Differences in the average aDOI measurements among the three observers ranged between 2 and 7 degrees. There was high inter-rater agreement (R = 0.99, p < 0.01) among all observers, and strong correlations between each pair of observers (0.92-0.99). Head rotation of 45 degrees (between the two views) resulted in a median difference in aDOI of 14 degrees, with excellent correlation among the observers. The rate of asymmetry was high, with a median difference of 39 degrees and up to 220 degrees between ears. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of aDOI using intraoperative plain x-rays is efficient and reliable. The effect of head positioning on measurement is small. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of aDOI and insertion symmetry on functional outcomes.

Merged Volume Rendered Flat-panel Computed Tomography for Postoperative Cochlear Implant Assessment.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of a new postprocessing method for postoperative control of cochlear implants (CI) based on a single flat detector computed tomography (FD-CT) run and volume rendering of 3D models of the inner ear. METHODS: The FD-CT datasets of CIs were selected and postprocessed to generate both standard multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) and merged volume-rendered 3D datasets (MRD) of the CIs. The MRDs consisted of two different reconstructions (bone/implant) that are automatically layered to avoid manual coregistration inaccuracy. Corresponding datasets were evaluated in consensus reading in terms of qualitative (integrity, position, configuration) and quantitative (insertion depth angle) CI parameters. RESULTS: In total 20 FD-CTs with 20 CIs were successfully postprocessed. Qualitative evaluation of MPR and MRD demonstrated complete congruency (integrity: narray integrity = 20; position: nscala tympani = 13, nscalar translocation = 7; configuration: nharmonic spiralization = 16, ntip fold over = 3, nlooped implant = 1). Adverse intracochlear implant spiralization was identified in all 10 cases with MRD and MPR. Measurement of the insertion depth angle in MRD was equivalent to that in MPR (r = 0.99; P = <0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of MRD is a helpful method for precise postoperative CI assessment and provides easy detection of incorrect intracochlear spiralization.

Qualitative Assessment of Columella Scar Quality After Extended Mohler Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.

BACKGROUND: The Extended Mohler cleft lip repair restores upper lip form using a columellar flap to fill the defect created by the downward rotation of Cupid's bow. The resulting columella incision is mentioned as a potential drawback. This study seeks to evaluate the morbidity of the resulting scar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 50 unilateral cleft lip patients treated using the Extended Mohler repair. 5 reviewers examined post-operative images. Three validated scar assessment scales were utilized: Manchester Scar Scale (MSS), Modified Scar-Rating Scale (MSRS), and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). A scar score for the lip and columellar portion of each patient was determined. RESULTS: Three different scar scales demonstrated significantly better scar quality for the columellar portion of the scar compared to the lip portion. The average score for the lip and columella using the MSS was 7.0 ±â€Š1.4 and 5.7 ±â€Š1.1 (P <0.001). The average score for the lip and columella using the MSRS was 5.5 ±â€Š1.4 and 4.3 ±â€Š0.9 (P <0.001). The average score for the lip and columella using the SBSES was 3.5 ±â€Š1.1 and 3.9 ±â€Š0.7 (P = 0.014). The intraclass correlation coefficient for lip scar assessments was 0.901 (MSS), 0.91 (MSRS), and 0.873 (Stony Brook Evaluation Scale [SBES]). The intraclass correlation coefficient for columellar scar assessment was 0.786 (MSS), 0.761 (MSRS), and 0.726 (SBES). CONCLUSION: The Extended Mohler unilateral cleft lip columellar scar is of superior quality compared to the lip portion. This analysis ameliorates one of the major concerns regarding the Extended Mohler cleft lip repair.

Workflow assessment as a preclinical development tool : Surgical process models of three techniques for minimally invasive cochlear implantation.

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive cochlear implant surgery is a challenging procedure due to high demands on accuracy. For clinical success, an according assistance system has to compete against the traditional approach in terms of risk, operating time and cost. It has not yet been determined what kind of system is the most suited. The purpose of this study is a proof of concept of surgical process modeling as a preclinical development tool and the comparison of workflow concepts for this new approach. METHODS: Three preclinical systems (two stereotactic and one robotic) for minimally invasive cochlear implant surgery are compared using the method of surgical process modeling. All three systems were successfully tested with ex vivo human specimen to create minimally invasive surgical access to the cochlea. Those systems where chosen for comparison, because they represent three diverse approaches with different corresponding workflows for the same intervention. The experiments were used to create a process model for each system by recording the interventions. RESULTS: All three conceptual systems developed by our group have shown their eligibility. The recorded process models provide a convenient method for direct comparison. Reduction in the surgical time has a higher impact on the process, than time that is needed for setting up a system beforehand. The stereotactic approaches have little preparation effort and are low cost in terms of hardware compared to the robotic approach, which in return is beneficial in terms of workload reduction for the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Surgical process modeling is suitable for comparison of different assistant systems for minimally invasive cochlear implantation. The benefit of reduced trauma, compared to the traditional mastoidectomy, can now be assessed with consideration of the workflow of each technique. The process models enable an assessment in the regard of surgical time and workload.

Intraoperative Conebeam CT for Assessment of Intracochlear Positioning of Electrode Arrays in Adult Recipients of Cochlear Implants.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraoperative conebeam CT has been introduced into the operating room and provides quick radiologic feedback. This study aimed to investigate its utility in the assessment of the positioning of the electrode array after cochlear implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 51 patients (65 ears) with intraoperative imaging by conebeam CT (O-arm) after cochlear implantation between 2013 and 2017. Correct placement into the cochlea was immediately identified. Positioning assessments were later analyzed with OsiriX software. RESULTS: Intraoperative imaging was quickly performed in all cases. No misplacement into the vestibule or semicircular canals was found. A foldover of the implanted array was identified in 1 patient. Secondary analysis by 2 raters showed excellent agreement on insertion depth angle (intraclass correlation = 0.96, P < .001) and length of insertion of the electrode array (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93, P = .04) measurements. The evaluation of the number of extracochlear electrodes was identical between the 2 raters in 78% of cases (Cohen κ = 0.55, P < .001). The scalar position was inconsistent between raters. When we compared O-arm and high-resolution CT images in 14 cases, the agreement was excellent for insertion depth angle (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97, P < .001) and insertion length (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98, P < .001), good for the number of extracochlear electrodes (Cohen κ = 0.63, P = .01), but moderate for the scalar position (Cohen κ = 0.59, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative conebeam CT using the O-arm is a safe, rapid, easy, and reliable procedure to immediately identify a misplacement or foldover of an electrode array. The insertion depth angle, insertion length, and number of electrodes inserted can be accurately assessed.

Population Statistics Approach for Safety Assessment in Robotic Cochlear Implantation.

HYPOTHESIS: Descriptive statistics with respect to patient anatomy and image guidance accuracy can be used to assess the effectiveness of any system for minimally invasive cochlear implantation, on both an individual patient and wider population level. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive cochlear implantation involves the drilling of a tunnel from the surface of the mastoid to cochlea, with the trajectory passing through the facial recess. The facial recess anatomy constrains the drilling path and places prohibitive accuracy requirements on the used system. Existing single thresholds are insufficient for assessing the effectiveness of these systems. METHODS: A statistical model of the anatomical situation encountered during minimally invasive drilling of the mastoid for cochlear implantation was developed. A literature review was performed to determine the statistical distribution of facial recess width; these values were confirmed through facial recess measurements on computed tomography (CT) data. Based on the accuracy of a robotic system developed by the authors, the effect of variation of system accuracy, precision, and tunnel diameter examined with respect to the potential treatable portion of the population. RESULTS: A facial recess diameter of 2.54 ±â€Š0.51 mm (n = 74) was determined from a review of existing literature; subsequent measurements on CT data revealed a facial recess diameter of 2.54 ±â€Š0.5 mm (n = 23). The developed model demonstrated the effects of varying accuracy on the treatable portion of the population. CONCLUSIONS: The presented model allows the assessment of the applicability of a system on a wider population scale beyond examining only the system's ability to reach an arbitrary threshold accuracy.

Cone Beam CT Versus Multislice CT: Radiologic Diagnostic Agreement in the Postoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic concordance between multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the early postoperative assessment of patients after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-center, interventional, pilot study on the diagnostic performance of a medical device. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients aged over 18 years requiring a computed tomographic (CT) scan after cochlear implant surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Nine patients were implanted with electrode arrays from three different manufacturers, including one bilateral. High-resolution MSCT and CBCT were then performed, and two experienced radiologists blinded to the imaging modality evaluated the randomized images, twice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Concordance between MSCT and CBCT for assessing the scalar position (tympani or vestibuli) of the electrodes. Secondary outcome measures were also studied: length of the intracochlear electrode array, percentage of implanted cochlea, number of intracochlear electrodes, and radiation doses. RESULTS: There was a good agreement between both CT scanners in determining the scalar position and estimating the number of implanted electrodes and percentage of implanted cochlea. CBCT had a lower radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The CBCT appears to be a useful tool for postoperative assessment of cochlear implanted adult patients and is comparable to the conventional scanner in determining the scalar position, with lower radiation exposure.

Assessment of Cochlear Trauma During Cochlear Implantation Using Electrocochleography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To assess cochlear trauma during cochlear implantation by electrocochleography (ECoG) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to correlate intraoperative cochlear trauma with postoperative loss of residual hearing. METHODS: ECoG recordings to tone bursts at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz and click stimuli were recorded before and after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array, using an extracochlear recording electrode. CBCTs were conducted within 6 weeks after surgery. Changes of intraoperative ECoG recordings and CBCT findings were correlated with postoperative threshold shifts in pure-tone audiograms. RESULTS: Fourteen subjects were included. In three subjects a decrease of low-frequency ECoG responses at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz occurred after insertion of the electrode array. This was associated with no or minimal residual hearing 4 weeks after surgery. ECoG responses to click stimuli were present in six subjects and showed a decrease after insertion of the electrode array in three. This was associated with a mean hearing loss of 21 dB in postoperative pure-tone audiograms. Scalar dislocation of the electrode array was assumed in one subject because of CBCT findings and correlated with a decrease of low-frequency ECoG responses and a complete loss of residual hearing. CONCLUSION: Hearing loss of ≤11 dB is not associated with detectable decrease in ECoG recordings during cochlear implantation. However, in a majority of patients with threshold shifts of >11 dB or complete hearing loss, an intraoperative decrease of high- or low-frequency ECoG signals occurs, suggesting acute cochlear trauma.

High-resolution secondary reconstructions with the use of flat panel CT in the clinical assessment of patients with cochlear implants.

Radiologic assessment of cochlear implants can be limited because of metallic streak artifacts and the high attenuation of the temporal bones. We report on 14 patients with 18 cochlear implants (17 Med-El standard 31.5-mm arrays, 1 Med-El medium 24-mm array) who underwent flat panel CT with the use of high-resolution secondary reconstruction techniques. Flat panel CT depicted the insertion site, cochlear implant course, and all 216 individual electrode contacts. The calculated mean angular insertion depth for standard arrays was 591.9° (SD = 70.9; range, 280°). High-resolution secondary reconstructions of the initial flat panel CT dataset, by use of a manually generated field of view, Hounsfield unit kernel type, and sharp image characteristics, provided high-quality images with improved spatial resolution. Flat panel CT is a promising imaging tool for the postoperative evaluation of cochlear implant placement.

Aplasia of the cochlea: radiologic assessment and options for hearing rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: Hearing rehabilitation of patients with severe inner ear malformations remains controversial. Our objective was to describe the radiologic findings of aplasia of the cochlea (AC) and evaluate the existing therapeutic options in such patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Pediatric and adult patients with AC evaluated at our institution from 1995 to 2010. INTERVENTIONS: The precise radiologic findings were identified using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the inner ear. In cases of auditory implantation on the AC side, the achieved outcome was recorded using categories of auditory performance (CAP). Related surgical aspects were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (28 ears) with AC were found. In 5 patients AC was bilateral. The remaining unilateral cases had contralateral normal ears (2 patients), cochlea hypoplasia (5 patients), common cavity (6 patients), incomplete partition Type I (4 patients), and atresia of the internal auditory canal (1 patient). Four patients (3 bilateral, 1 unilateral ACs) were treated with cochlear implants in ears with AC, and 1 patient underwent auditory brainstem implantation. All implanted patients achieved speech perception with limited vocabulary (CAP scores between 4 and 5). CONCLUSION: AC is defined as the total absence of the cochlea, with a present, although malformed, vestibule. Although a distinct auditory nerve was not seen in these cases of AC, results following cochlear implantation suggest functional cochlear nerve fibers in the remaining dysplastic inner ear structures. In selected cases, cochlear implantation may be a reasonable option for the habilitation of deafness associated with AC.

Third-window vibroplasty with an active middle ear implant: assessment of physiologic responses in a model of stapes fixation in Chinchilla lanigera.

HYPOTHESIS: Mechanical stimulation through a cochlear third window into the scala tympani in a chinchilla model with normal and fixed stapes can generate cochlear responses equivalent to acoustic stimuli. BACKGROUND: Cochlear stimulation via the round window (RW) using active middle ear implants (AMEIs) can produce physiologic responses similar to acoustic stimulation including in a model of stapes fixation. However, pathologic conditions, such as advanced otosclerosis, can preclude delivery of sound energy to the cochlea through the oval window and/or the RW. METHODS: Cochlear microphonic (CM) and laser Doppler vibrometer measurements of stapes and RW velocities were performed in 6 ears of 4 chinchillas. Baseline measurements to acoustic sinusoidal stimuli (0.25-8 kHz) were made. Measurements were repeated with an AMEI driving the RW or a third window to the scala tympani before and after stapes fixation. RESULTS: AMEI stimulation of the third window produced CM waveforms with morphologies similar to acoustic stimuli. CM thresholds with RW and third-window stimulation were frequency dependent but ranged from 0.25 to 10 and 0.5 to 40 mV, respectively. Stapes fixation, confirmed by laser Doppler vibrometer measurements, resulted in a significant frequency dependent impairment in CM thresholds up to 13 dB (at <3 kHz) for RW stimulation and a nonsignificant frequency-dependent improvement of up to 10 dB (at >3 kHz) via third-window stimulation. CONCLUSION: AMEI mechanical stimulation through a third window into the scala tympani produces physiologic responses nearly identical to acoustic stimulation including in a model of stapes fixation with decreased efficiency.

Time of cochlear implant surgery in academic settings.

OBJECTIVE: Establish the time required to perform cochlear implantation (CI) in academic settings. STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: German and American academic centers. PATIENTS: A total of 2639 patients underwent CI (1997-2007). We excluded patients receiving an experimental device or technique and those with abnormal cochlear anatomy or incomplete charts, leaving 2253 for analysis. INTERVENTION: Unilateral, bilateral, and revision CI with devices approved in the U.S. and Europe. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean surgical time (ST) and total operating room time (TORT). RESULTS: Mixed model analysis was used; estimated marginal means were calculated in minutes after adjusting for random effect of individual surgeon. There were no differences between unilateral (ST = 171, TORT = 245) and revision CI (ST = 160, TORT = 232), but bilateral procedures were longer (ST = 295, TORT = 377, P < 0.001). In unilateral surgeries, Cochlear Limited (CL) devices were implanted faster (ST = 165, TORT = 225) than Advanced Bionics (ABC) (ST = 183, P = 0.001; TORT = 240, P = 0.023) or MedEl (ST = 193, P < 0.001; TORT = 253, P = 0.002) devices. There were no differences for unilateral CI between ABC and MedEl devices. For revision CI, ABC devices (ST = 141, TORT = 219) were implanted faster than CL devices (ST = 181, P = 0.001; TORT = 266, P < 0.001). There were no differences by age group or between Germany and the U.S. ST and TORT were shorter for 575 CIs performed in the final two years of the study (unilateral CI: ST = 145, TORT = 209; bilateral CI: ST = 259, TORT = 330; revision CI: ST = 138, TORT = 205). For unilateral CI, ST and TORT decreased yearly (linear regression, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with surgeon experience (linear regression, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We report the time required to perform CI in academic settings-data that are vital for cost-benefit analyses and assessing new CI techniques.

Bilateral, simultaneous cochlear implantation in children: surgical considerations.

PROBLEM: The advantages of bilateral, simultaneous cochlear implantation include: the possibility to pre-empt cochlear calcification following meningitis; reduction of the intervention to only one procedure, general anaesthetic and course of clinical care (with obvious benefits for the patient); and greater cost-effectiveness. The disadvantages of such a procedure include: doubling the risk of associated complications; placing the patient on the implanted side during contralateral implantation; the possibility of vestibular alteration simultaneously in both ears; the need for precise planning of symmetrical incisions and implant sites; and longer surgery time. METHODS: The study cohort included 10 children who underwent bilateral, simultaneous cochlear implantation using the suprameatal approach. RESULTS: The overall operation time, inclusive of anaesthesia, was approximately three hours in all cases. None of the children had any intra- or post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: From a surgical perspective, bilateral, simultaneous cochlear implantation is a safe procedure. The use of a non-mastoidectomy approach is recommended.