Current patient perspectives of vulvovaginal candidiasis: incidence, symptoms, management and post-treatment outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common infection affecting women worldwide. Reports of patterns/risk factors/trends for episodic/recurrent VVC (RVVC) are largely outdated. The purpose of this study was to obtain current patient perspectives of several aspects of VVC/RVVC. METHODS: Business cards containing on-line survey information were distributed to healthy volunteers and patients seeking standard, elective, or referral gynecologic care in university-affiliated Obstetrics/Gynecology clinics. The internet-based questionnaire was completed by 284 non-pregnant women (78% Caucasian, 14% African American, 8% Asian). RESULTS: The majority of the participants (78%) indicated a history of VVC with 34% defined as having RVVC. The most common signs/symptoms experienced were itching, burning and redness with similar ranking of symptoms among VVC and RVVC patients. Among risk factors, antibiotic use ranked highest followed by intercourse, humid weather and use of feminine hygiene products. A high number of respondents noted 'no known cause' (idiopathic episodes) that was surprisingly similar among women with a history of either VVC or RVVC. VVC/RVVC episodes reported were primarily physician-diagnosed (73%) with the remainder mostly reporting self-diagnosis and treating with over-the-counter (OTC) medications. Most physician-diagnosed attacks utilized a combination of pelvic examination and laboratory tests followed by prescribed antifungals. Physician-treated cases achieved a higher level of symptom relief (84%) compared to those who self-medicated (57%). The majority of women with RVVC (71%) required continual or long-term antifungal medication as maintenance therapy to control symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Current patient perspectives closely reflect historically documented estimates of VVC/RVVC prevalence and trends regarding symptomatology, disease management and post-treatment outcomes.

Self-reported yeast symptoms compared with clinical wet mount analysis and vaginal yeast culture in a specialty clinic setting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of patients' self-reported symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis and the accuracy of clinical wet mount examinations compared with vulvovaginal yeast culture results in a specialty clinic. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of new patients seen at the Saint Louis University Vulvar and Vaginal Disease Clinic from January 2005 to March 2006 was performed. Patients' age, medication use, symptom scores on a rating scale for vaginal/vulvar pain, burning, itching, dyspareunia and wet mount analyses were compared with yeast culture results. RESULTS: Of 153 patients, 40 had positive yeast cultures (prevalence rate 26.1%). Compared with yeast cultures, self-reported symptom scores >4 resulted in high sensitivity (90%) and low specificity (7%). Positive wet mount result showed low sensitivity (18%) and high specificity (99%). Patient symptom scores were a poor predictor of yeast infections based on yeast culture results. No correlation was found among wet mount, self-reported symptoms and yeast culture results. No significant difference between age or symptom scores to culture result was found. CONCLUSION: Wet mount analysis for recurrent or persistent patient symptoms should be reevaluated. Self-reported symptoms are not reliable for diagnosis. Wet mount analysis resulted in low sensitivity. Yeast cultures should be considered the gold standard for identification of vulvovaginal candidiasis in persistent or recurrent cases.

Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal agents for the treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush): a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the relative effectiveness, cost effectiveness and safety of oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatments for uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush) and establish patient preference for the route of anti-fungal administration. DESIGN: A systematic review of studies comparing oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatments for uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis. Standard Cochrane Collaboration methods were used. DATA SOURCES: The following sources were searched: the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register; the Cochrane Sexually Transmitted Disease review group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials; EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2000); and MEDLINE (January 1985 to May 2000). The reference list of each trial was checked for additional references. The manufacturers of anti-fungal treatments in the UK were asked for information on trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria. METHODS: There was duplicate, independent examination and selection of the electronic search results followed by duplicate data abstraction. Disagreements regarding inclusion status and data abstraction were resolved by discussion between reviewers and the editor of the Cochrane Sexually Transmitted Disease group. Randomised controlled trials conducted worldwide and published in any language were included. The primary outcome measure was clinical cure. Mycological cure, patient preference and safety were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Seventeen trials were included in the review, reporting 19 oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatment comparisons. No statistically significant differences were shown between oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatment for clinical or mycological cure. All 10 trials that reported a preference favoured oral treatment (compared with intra-vaginal or no preference). No trials presented cost data. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference between the relativeeffectiveness of oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatment for thrush.

[Psychosocial risk factors in vulvovaginal mycosis. A multivariate long-term study]. / Psycho-soziale Risikofaktoren der Vulvovaginalmykose. Eine multivariate Langzeitstudie.

The results of a multivariate logit-analysis of n = 9098 (female) patients of a gynecologic practice (from 1991 to 1994) confirm the relevance of psycho-social factors like employment, being married, smoking etc. on the incidence of the vulvovaginal mycosis. By the statistical results the studied factors can be rank-ordered from "smoking" as the most relevant to "virginity" as the most irrelevant factor. Surprisingly sexual contact and using oral contraception had no relevance. A check-list using factor-combinations enables to discriminate 48 types of female with different risk of incidence. The results of the study are in accordance with the following hypothesis: In most cases stress, induced by the psycho-social situation of the female and weakening the immune system, is the only responsible factor for the incidence of vulvovaginal mycosis.