Pembrolizumab más carboplatino y paclitaxel en pacientes con cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas, metastásico, escamoso, con genes EGFR y ALK no mutados y sin tratamiento sistémico previo / Pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic, squamous, EGFR- and ALK-unmutated non-small cell lung cancer without prior systemic treatment

INTRODUCCIÓN: Cuadro clínico: El cáncer de pulmón es una neoplasia maligna que se origina en las vías respiratorias o el parénquima pulmonar siendo la primera causa de muertes por cáncer a nivel mundial. El cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas (CPCNP) es el subtipo histológico más frecuente (entre el 80 % al 90 %). La tasa de sobrevida general a 5 años para el CPCNP es de 0 % al 10 % en pacientes con estadio avanzado (estadio IVA-IVB). Cerca del 70% de los pacientes con cáncer de pulmón presentan enfermedad localmente avanzada o metastásica en el momento del diagnóstico. El CPCNP consta de diferentes subtipos histológicos, entre ellos el carcinoma de células escamosas. Los carcinomas de células escamosas representan del 25% al 30% de los cánceres de pulmón y tienden a surgir de células ubicadas en el epitelio de las vías respiratorias. Sobre la carga de enfermedad, los reportes nacionales informan que el cáncer de pulmón, tráquea y bronquio generó 39,023 años de vida saludables perdidos (AVISA) en el 2019. Con respecto al tratamiento, siendo el CPCNP metastásico, escamoso, con genes EGFR y ALK no mutados, una enfermedad incurable, el objetivo del tratamiento es prolongar la vida sin detrimento de la calidad de vida ni de la seguridad del paciente. Las opciones terapéuticas recomendadas en guías de práctica clínica dependen, entre otros, del estado funcional y del estado de expresión de la proteína PD-L1. Dentro de las opciones de terapias sistemáticas de primera línea se encuentra el uso combinado de quimioterapia más inmunoterapia, inmunoterapia o quimioterapia dependiendo de los aspectos mencionados. Tecnología sanitária: Pembrolizumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal humanizado recombinante de isotipo kappa IgG4 contra el receptor

Cost-effectiveness analysis of dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced endometrial cancer.

Background: A recent phase III clinical trial (NCT03981796) evaluated the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab combined with carboplatin-paclitaxel (DOS-CP) compared to placebo combined with carboplatin-paclitaxel (PLB-CP) as a first-line treatment for advanced endometrial cancer (EC). The NCT03981796 trial demonstrated that DOS-CP significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with advanced EC while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. However, DOS-CP is expensive and its cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOS-CP compared to PLB-CP as a first-line treatment for advanced EC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: A Markov model with three health states was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOS-CP as a first-line treatment for advanced EC. Clinical efficacy data were derived from the NCT03981796 trial, and drug costs were determined based on national tender prices. Other costs and utility values were obtained from published literature. The outcomes assessed included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The robustness of the model was assessed through one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: In comparison to PLB-CP, the ICER of DOS-CP was $98,276.61/QALY for the overall population, $53,063.61/QALY for the dMMR subgroup, and $124,088.56/QALY for the pMMR subgroup. All of these ICER values were higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,201 per QALY. The most important variable that affected the results of the model was the discount rate, the cost of dostarlimab, and the utility value for progressive disease. Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, DOS-CP is unlikely to be a cost-effective first-line treatment option for advanced EC.

Cost Effectiveness of Adding Pembrolizumab to Platinum and Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A US Healthcare Payer's Perspective.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pembrolizumab plus cisplatin and fluorouracil demonstrated superior efficacy and comparable safety compared with fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) as first-line treatment for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in a phase III trial (KEYNOTE-590). This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus FP versus FP and versus a blended chemotherapy comparator including FP, carboplatin plus paclitaxel, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, docetaxel plus FP, trastuzumab plus FP, and trastuzumab plus FOLFOX from a US healthcare payer's perspective. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed with three health states (progression-free, progressive disease, and death). Overall survival, progression-free survival, time on treatment, and adverse events were informed by patient-level data from KEYNOTE-590. The blended chemotherapy comparator reflected the current US treatment landscape and was assumed to have similar efficacy and safety as FP. Health utilities were estimated using linear mixed-effects models based on EQ-5D-5L data from the trial. Resource use and cost inputs (2020 US dollars) were based on US standard sources and literature. Costs, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) discounted at 3.0% per year and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were outcomes in the model. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of base-case results. RESULTS: Compared with FP, pembrolizumab plus FP produced a mean gain of 0.86 life-year and 0.77 QALY with additional costs of $112,630 over 37.6 years, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $147,097 per QALY. Results were similar when the intervention was pembrolizumab plus alternative chemotherapies or when blended chemotherapy became the comparator. Results were most sensitive to different overall survival extrapolation approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy extended life-years and QALYs and is cost effective compared with chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer in the USA given a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY.

Serplulimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Introduction: The ASTRUM-005 trial (NCT04063163) revealed that combination serplulimab plus chemotherapy (etoposide and carboplatin [EC]) treatment was associated with survival advantages relative to chemotherapy alone in patients diagnosed with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). As these immuno-chemotherapeutic regimens are extremely expensive, however, it is critical that the relative cost-effectiveness of combination serplulimab and chemotherapy treatment as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC patients be examined in detail. Methods: The cost-effectiveness of combined serplulimab plus chemotherapeutic treatment was examined using a comprehensive Markov model with a 10-year boundary, enabling the calculation of overall cost, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Model instability was interrogated through one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Serplulimab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone respectively yielded 1.217 QALYs (2.243 LYs) and 0.885 QALYs (1.661 LYs) with corresponding total costs of $11,202 and $7,194, with an ICER of $12,077 per QALY ($6,883 per LY). This model was most strongly influenced by the utility of progression-free survival. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that serplulimab plus chemotherapy had a 91.6% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $37,653 per QALY (3 × capita gross domestic product of China in 2021). In subgroup analyses, this combination treatment regimen was found to be most cost-effective in patients who were former smokers, had an ECOG performance status of 0, and were diagnosed with brain metastases. Conclusion: From a payer perspective in China, combination serplulimab plus chemotherapy treatment represents a cost-effective first-line intervention for ES-SCLC patients.

Pembrolizumab and lenvatinib versus carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A Markov analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib (P/L) versus standard-of-care carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/T) as first-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. METHODS: We designed a Markov model to simulate treatment outcomes for advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer patients whose tumors are either microsatellite stable (MSS) or have high microsatellite instability (MSI-high). We adopted a healthcare sector perspective for the analysis. Model inputs for costs, health utility, and clinical estimates were obtained from the literature including data from GOG0209 and KEYNOTE-146. Primary outcomes included costs of care, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The time-horizon was three years and the discount rate was 3% annually. RESULTS: In a MSS cohort, compared to C/T, first-line treatment with P/L increased treatment costs by $212,670 and decreased QALYs by 0.28 per patient. In a MSI-high cohort, compared to C/T, P/L increased costs by $313,487 and increased QALYs by 0.11 per patient, representing an ICER of $2,849,882 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses found that the price of the new drugs was the most important determinant of the ICER and that the price of the new drugs would need to decrease by 85% to $2817 per cycle to reach a $150,000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSION: In the MSS model, we found that first-line therapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with P/L increased costs and worsened outcomes compared to C/T. In the MSI-high model, P/L improved survival and QALYs compared to C/T but was not cost-effective at the current cost of the drugs.

Association Between First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibition and Survival for Medicare-Insured Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: Immunotherapy is now a cornerstone of treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its uptake and effectiveness among older patients outside clinical trials remain poorly understood. Objective: To understand treatment patterns and evaluate the overall survival associated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and combined chemoimmunotherapy for older patients who have advanced NSCLC and Medicare coverage. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included Medicare-insured patients in the US aged 66 to 89 years who initiated first palliative-intent systemic therapy for lung cancer between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Survival follow-up continued through March 31, 2020. A total of 19 529 patients who had advanced lung cancer and were insured by a Medicare fee-for-service plan were included in the analysis. Exposures: Regimens included pembrolizumab monotherapy (n = 3079), combined platinum-based drug (ie, cisplatin or carboplatin [hereinafter, platinum]) and pemetrexed disodium (n = 5159), combined platinum and a taxane (ie, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or docetaxel) (n = 9866), and combined platinum, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab (n = 1425), as ascertained using Medicare claims from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival, which was measured using the restricted mean survival time (RMST) with propensity score adjustment for clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Median survival was also reported for comparison with outcomes from registrational trials. Results: A total of 19 529 patients (54% male, 46% female; median age, 73.8 [interquartile range, 69.9-78.4] years) were identified for analysis. The uptake of pembrolizumab-containing regimens in the Medicare population was rapid, increasing from 0.7% of first-line treatments in the second quarter of 2016 to 42.4% in the third quarter of 2018. Patients who were older (≥70 years, 2484 [81%]), were female (1577 [51%]), and/or had higher Risk Stratification Index scores (highest quintile, 922 [30%]) were more likely to receive single-agent pembrolizumab than chemotherapy. After propensity score adjustment, pembrolizumab was associated with survival similar to platinum/pemetrexed (RMST difference, -0.2 [95% CI, -0.5 to 0.2] months) or platinum/taxane (RMST difference, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.0 to -0.4] months). Patients receiving platinum/pemetrexed/pembrolizumab chemoimmunotherapy also had adjusted survival similar to those receiving platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy (RMST difference, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.1-0.9] months). The unadjusted median survival was 11.4 (95% CI, 10.5-12.3) months among patients receiving single-agent pembrolizumab, approximately 15 months shorter than observed among pembrolizumab-treated participants in the KEYNOTE-024 trial. The unadjusted median survival was 12.9 (95% CI, 11.8-14.0) months among patients receiving platinum/pemetrexed/pembrolizumab chemoimmunotherapy, approximately 10 months shorter than observed among platinum/pemetrexed/pembrolizumab-treated participants in the KEYNOTE-189 trial. Conclusions and Relevance: Immunotherapy has been incorporated rapidly into treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. However, survival estimates in the Medicare population are much shorter than those reported in registrational trials. These results provide contemporary estimates of survival for older patients with advanced NSCLC treated in routine practice, facilitating patient-centered decision-making.

Social and Clinical Correlates of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Medicare Beneficiaries With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer From 2004-2015.

OBJECTIVE: To assess social and clinical correlates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) utilization among Medicare beneficiaries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of SEER-Medicare (2004-2015) patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy were stratified into 3-groups: standard of care NAC (cisplatin-based combination), non-standard of care NAC, and upfront cystectomy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess social, demographic and clinical correlates of each treatment category. Survival analyses were performed to compare propensity matched treatment groups. RESULTS: In total, 6214 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 21 [IQR 7-54] months. NAC utilization increased from 10.7% to 39.1%, between 2004 and 2015, largely due to increased use of standard of care regimens. The most commonly used nonstandard regimen was gemcitabine/carboplatin (50.2%). Older age, Hispanic and Black race, lower socioeconomic status, and contraindications to cisplatin were associated with increased odds of receiving nonstandard of care NAC compared to standard of care. Standard of care NAC was associated with improved overall survival HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.76, 0.94) and HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.63, 0.89) compared to both upfront cystectomy and nonstandard of care NAC, respectively. CONCLUSION: NAC utilization has increased to nearly 40%; however, the use of non-standard of care NAC regimen have persisted (~8%). Cisplatin-ineligibility, older age, race/ethnicity, and lower socioeconomic status were correlated with nonstandard of care NAC, which provided no clinical benefit at the risk of potential harm. In accordance with current clinical guidelines, cisplatin-ineligible patients should be considered for timely upfront cystectomy or novel clinical trials.

Assessment of Tumor Response in Mice with Ovarian Peritoneal Carcinomatosis using Doppler Ultrasound of the Superior Mesenteric Artery and Celiac Trunk.

The goal of the work described here was to assess the performance of Doppler ultrasound (US) of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac trunk (CT) in the evaluation of tumor response in female mice with ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis treated either with bevacizumab or with carboplatin. Compared with untreated mice, carboplatin-treated mice had a lower weight (23.3 ± 2.0 vs. 27.9 ± 2.9 g, p < 0.001), peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI, 11 ± 3 vs. 28 ± 6, p < 0.001), Ki67-positive staining surfaces (p < 0.001), vascular density (p < 0.001), mean blood flow velocity (mBFVel) in the SMA (7.0 ± 1.4 vs. 10.9 ± 1.8 cm/s, p < 0.001) and CT (8.0 ± 1.8 vs. 14.3 ± 4.6 cm/s, p < 0.001) and no ascites. Weight and mBFVel were similar in bevacizumab-treated and untreated mice. The mBFVels in the SMA and CT correlated with the PCI used as an estimation of the tumor burden, R = 0.70 (p < 0.0001) and R = 0.65 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Doppler US allows non-invasive assessment of the effects of anticancer therapy in ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis-induced mice.

Assessment of structural chromosomal instability phenotypes as biomarkers of carboplatin response in triple negative breast cancer: the TNT trial.

BACKGROUND: In the TNT trial of triple negative breast cancer (NCT00532727), germline BRCA1/2 mutations were present in 28% of carboplatin responders. We assessed quantitative measures of structural chromosomal instability (CIN) to identify a wider patient subgroup within TNT with preferential benefit from carboplatin over docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Copy number aberrations (CNAs) were established from 135 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary carcinomas using Illumina OmniExpress SNP-arrays. Seven published [allelic imbalanced CNA (AiCNA); allelic balanced CNA (AbCNA); copy number neutral loss of heterozygosity (CnLOH); number of telomeric allelic imbalances (NtAI); BRCA1-like status; percentage of genome altered (PGA); homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores] and two novel [Shannon diversity index (SI); high-level amplifications (HLAMP)] CIN-measurements were derived. HLAMP was defined based on the presence of at least one of the top 5% amplified cytobands located on 1q, 8q and 10p. Continuous CIN-measurements were divided into tertiles. All nine CIN-measurements were used to analyse objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Patients with tumours without HLAMP had a numerically higher ORR and significantly longer PFS in the carboplatin (C) than in the docetaxel (D) arm [56% (C) versus 29% (D), PHLAMP,quiet = 0.085; PFS 6.1 months (C) versus 4.1 months (D), Pinteraction/HLAMP = 0.047]. In the carboplatin arm, patients with tumours showing intermediate telomeric NtAI and AiCNA had higher ORR [54% (C) versus 20% (D), PNtAI,intermediate = 0.03; 62% (C) versus 33% (D), PAiCNA,intermediate = 0.076]. Patients with high AiCNA and PGA had shorter PFS in the carboplatin arm [3.4 months (high) versus 5.7 months (low/intermediate); and 3.8 months (high) versus 5.6 months (low/intermediate), respectively; Pinteraction/AiCNA = 0.027, Padj.interaction/AiCNA = 0.125 and Pinteraction/PGA = 0.053, Padj.interaction/PGA = 0.176], whilst no difference was observed in the docetaxel arm. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tumours lacking HLAMP and demonstrating intermediate CIN-measurements formed a subgroup benefitting from carboplatin relative to docetaxel treatment within the TNT trial. This suggests a complex and paradoxical relationship between the extent of genomic instability in primary tumours and treatment response in the metastatic setting.

Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of PD-L1-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab has been approved in the United States (US) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and with tumors expressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (Combined Positive Score ≥ 10), or ineligible for any platinum-containing chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. Long-term KEYNOTE-052 data continue to demonstrate pembrolizumab's meaningful, durable, and well-tolerated antitumor activity. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients who have PD-L1-positive tumors from a US third-party healthcare payer's perspective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A partitioned survival model containing 3 health states (progression-free, progressed, and death) was developed. A simulated treatment comparison and a network meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the comparative efficacy of pembrolizumab versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Overall survival, progression-free survival, time on treatment, adverse events, and utilities were modeled using the final analyses of the KEYNOTE-052 trial and 4 studies for carboplatin plus gemcitabine. Cost data were estimated using US standard sources and real-world data. Deterministic, probabilistic, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Over 20 years, pembrolizumab resulted in a mean gain of 2.58 life-years, 2.01 quality-adjusted life-years, and additional costs of $158,561, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $78,925/quality-adjusted life-year compared with carboplatin plus gemcitabine. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that pembrolizumab is cost-effective compared with carboplatin plus gemcitabine as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are PD-L1-positive.

Cost-Effectiveness of the Addition of Bevacizumab to First-Line Chemotherapy With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the perspective of the Colombian health system. METHODS: A Markov model was employed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel (BCP) compared with carboplatin + paclitaxel (CP) in the treatment of NSCLS during a 4-year period. The health outcome was the number of life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) obtained from the survival curves reported in a clinical study. Costs were estimated using national tariff and reported in US dollars at a date in 2019. Costs and effectiveness outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3.5% per year. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed on important parameters with a Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: The costs of BCP and CP were $30 341 and $11 735, respectively. The LYG for BCP and CP were 0.34 and 0.29, respectively. The QALY for BCP and CP were 0.27 and 0.23. The ICER of BCP versus CP was $ 465 150 QALY. The results of the Monte Carlo simulation showed that CP was cost-effective in 100% of the iterations compared with BCP. CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to the scheme carboplatin + paclitaxel compared to carboplatin + paclitaxel for NSCLC is not cost-effective from the point of view of the Colombian health system.

Survival, Chemotherapy Treatments, and Health Care Utilization Among Patients with Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Most cases of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. The objective of this study was to investigate patient characteristics, survival, chemotherapy treatments, and health care use after a diagnosis of advanced SCLC in subjects enrolled in a health system network. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥ 18 years who either were diagnosed with stage III/IV SCLC or who progressed to advanced SCLC during the study period (2005-2015). Patients identified from the Indiana State Cancer Registry and the Indiana Network for Patient Care were followed from their advanced diagnosis index date until the earliest date of the last visit, death, or the end of the study period. Patient characteristics, survival, chemotherapy regimens, associated health care visits, and durations of treatment were reported. Time-to-event analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 498 patients with advanced SCLC were identified, of whom 429 were newly diagnosed with advanced disease and 69 progressed to advanced disease during the study period. Median survival from the index diagnosis date was 13.2 months. First-line (1L) chemotherapy was received by 464 (93.2%) patients, most commonly carboplatin/etoposide, received by 213 (45.9%) patients, followed by cisplatin/etoposide (20.7%). Ninety-five (20.5%) patients progressed to second-line (2L) chemotherapy, where topotecan monotherapy (20.0%) was the most common regimen, followed by carboplatin/etoposide (14.7%). Median survival was 10.1 months from 1L initiation and 7.7 months from 2L initiation. CONCLUSION: Patients in a regional health system network diagnosed with advanced SCLC were treated with chemotherapy regimens similar to those in earlier reports based on SEER-Medicare data. Survival of patients with advanced SCLC was poor, illustrating the lack of progress over several decades in the treatment of this lethal disease and highlighting the need for improved treatments.

Cost-effectiveness of Osimertinib as a Second-line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China.

PURPOSE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of osimertinib used as a second-line treatment after failure of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. METHODS: From the perspective of China's health care system, a Markov model was used for estimating the costs and health outcomes of osimertinib and 4 platinum-based chemotherapies, including pemetrexed + platinum (PP), gemcitabine + platinum (GP), docetaxel + platinum (DP), and paclitaxel + platinum (TP). Two scenarios were considered, one in all confirmed patients with T790M-positive disease (scenario 1) and the other in all patients whose disease progressed after epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, which consisted of patients with T790M-positive or T790M-negative NSCLC (scenario 2). Clinical data for transition probabilities and treatment effects were obtained from published clinical trials. Health care resource utilization and costs were derived from local administrative databases and published literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty of the results. FINDINGS: In the base-case analysis, compared with the 4 platinum-based chemotherapies, osimertinib yielded an additional 0.671 to 0.846 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), with incremental costs of 15,943 to 20,299 USD in scenario 1, and an additional 0.376 to 0.808 QALY with incremental costs of 9710 to 15,407 USD in scenario 2. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probabilities that osimertinib would be cost-effective were 57.7% in scenario 1 and 58.4% in scenario 2 if the willingness-to-pay threshold were 30,000 USD/QALY, and probabilities would be more than 75 % in both scenarios if the willingness-to-pay threshold were 50,000 USD/QALY. IMPLICATIONS: Osimertinib is likely to be cost-effective when used as a second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC in China based on the latest reimbursement price of osimertinib through National Reimbursement Drug List negotiation.

Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.

Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy has recently become the standard of care for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. The implications of these first-line treatments are considerable, given the potential population of patients eligible to receive them and their high cost. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding atezolizumab to bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel as a first-line treatment strategy for patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this economic evaluation, a primary microsimulation model was developed to assess atezolizumab combination vs bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel alone in the first line (base case 1). A secondary model was developed to assess these treatments along with pembrolizumab combination and platinum doublet chemotherapy (base case 2). Treatment strategies and other simulated conditions were based on those from the IMpower150 and KEYNOTE-189 clinical trials. The study perspective was the US health care sector. One million patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer were simulated for each treatment group. This study was performed from February 2019 through May 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results: In base case 1, in which 1 million patients were simulated, treating with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in the first line was associated with a mean cost of $112 551 (95% CI, $112 450-$112 653) and a mean survival of 1.48 QALYs (95% CI, 1.47-1.48 QALYs) per patient. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel was associated with a mean cost of $244 166 (95% CI, $243 864-$244 468) and a mean survival of 2.13 QALYs (95% CI, 2.12-2.13 QALYs) per patient, for an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $201 676 per QALY (95% CI, $198 105-$205 355 per QALY). In base case 2, in which 1 million patients were simulated, pembrolizumab combination therapy was associated with a mean cost of $226 282 (95% CI, $226 007-$226 557) and a mean survival of 2.45 QALYs (95% CI, 2.44-2.46 QALYs) per patient. Pembrolizumab combination dominated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $116 698 per QALY (95% CI, $115 088-$118 342 per QALY) between pembrolizumab combination and bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel. Atezolizumab combination was not cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. Conclusions and Relevance: In this simulated model economic analysis, atezolizumab combination was not cost-effective compared with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel and provided suboptimal incremental benefit compared with cost vs pembrolizumab combination for first-line treatment. Although atezolizumab combination therapy provides clinical benefits, price reductions may be necessary for this treatment strategy to become cost-effective.

Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Patients with Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy.

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for effective therapies for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who cannot tolerate cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cisplatin-ineligible patients experience a high frequency of adverse events from the most commonly used standard of care treatment, carboplatin plus gemcitabine, or alternative treatment with gemcitabine monotherapy. Pembrolizumab is a potent, highly selective humanised monoclonal antibody that releases checkpoint inhibition of the immune response system, and provides a new alternative for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for first-line treatment of urothelial carcinoma ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy in patients with strongly PD-L1-positive tumours in Sweden. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Parametric survival curves were fitted to overall survival, progression-free survival, and time on treatment data from KEYNOTE-052 to extrapolate clinical outcomes. A simulated treatment comparison and a network meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the comparative efficacy of pembrolizumab versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy. EQ-5D data from KEYNOTE-052 were used to estimate utility, while resource use and cost inputs were estimated using Swedish regional pricing lists and clinician opinion. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The model reported costs, life years, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and results were tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We estimated that pembrolizumab would improve survival by 2.11 and 2.16 years and increase QALYs by 1.71 and 1.75 compared to carboplatin plus gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy, respectively. Pembrolizumab was associated with a cost increase of €90520 versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine and €95055 versus gemcitabine, with corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of €53055/QALY and €54415/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €100000/QALY, pembrolizumab is a cost-effective treatment versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine and versus gemcitabine. PATIENT SUMMARY: This is the first analysis to show that pembrolizumab is a cost-effective option for first-line treatment of cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Sweden.

First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: The IMpower150 trial found that adding atezolizumab to the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy improved survival for patients with metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, considering the high cost of immunotherapy, there is a need to assess its value by considering both efficacy and cost. The current study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab in the first-line setting for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC from the US payer perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime cost and effectiveness of the combination of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) with the combination of bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BCP) and carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC. Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and lifetime costs were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty. Additional subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: ABCP provided an additional 0.413 QALYs (0.460 LYs) and 0.738 QALYs (0.956 LYs), respectively, compared with BCP and CP. The corresponding incremental costs were $234,998 and $381,116, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for ABCP was $568,967 per QALY compared with BCP and $516,114 per QALY compared with CP. The subgroup analysis demonstrated that PD-L1 expression of ≥50% on tumor cells (TC3) or ≥10% on immune cells (IC3) decreased the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to $464,703 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of the US payer, ABCP is estimated to not be cost-effective compared with BCP or CP in the first-line setting for patients with metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY.

Financial audit of wastage of anticancer drugs: Pilot study from a tertiary care center in India.

PURPOSE: Drug wastage is a major concern in oncology where costs of antineoplastic drugs are exorbitant, and the disposal of toxic drugs increases the chances of occupational hazards to healthcare and sanitary workers and environmental pollution at the site of disposal. The principal objective of this study was to ascertain the extent of drug wastage and calculate its financial costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective pilot study conducted to ascertain the quantity of drug wastage in a tertiary care hospital. This pilot study was conducted in day care and inpatient facilities in February 2016. The prescription of cytotoxic drugs, recommended dose, the quantity used, and remainder (waste) left were recorded from the nurses and pharmacy files of the hospital. Cost evaluation of the actual use and the waste was undertaken and an audit was conducted to understand in which anticancer drug the maximum wastage was generated. RESULTS: The results of this study indicated that 6.1% of the total amount of reconstituted drugs was wasted. The highest drug wastage was observed in trastuzumab (29.55%), followed by etoposide (20.4%), dacarbazine (17.14%), daunorubicin (16.67%), and carboplatin (11.29%). Cost analysis showed that the total cost of the drug issued during the study period was Rs. 1,294,975 and the cost of drug wastage amounted to Rs. 143,820 (11.1%). CONCLUSION: To the best of authors' knowledge, this is the first study from India and the results indicate that the financial impact of anticancer drug wastage was substantial. Attempts should be directed at minimizing the wastage and cost savings without risking patients' treatment regimen and administering effective dose schedule.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial has shown atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer could significantly prolong overall survival and progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung from an American perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Basic medical information was derived from the double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (IMpower133, NCT02763579). A Markov model was developed to simulate the process of small-cell lung cancer, including three health states: progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and death. Utilities and costs were obtained from published resources. Sensitivity analyses were applied to explore the impact of essential variables. RESULTS: Treatment with atezolizumab plus chemotherapy was estimated to increase costs by $52,881compared with chemotherapy alone, with a gain of 0.10 quality adjusted life years (QALYs), leading to an incremental cost-effective ratio of $528,810 per QALY. The cost of PFS state and atezolizumab were the most influential factors to the model. CONCLUSION: The combination of atezolizumab, carboplatin and etoposide is not a cost-effective choice in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage SCLC from an American perspective.

Frailty assessment predicts toxicity during first cycle chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer regardless of chronologic age.

BACKGROUND: Improved assessment strategies are needed to individualize treatment for adults of all ages receiving palliative chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our aim was to evaluate the utility of the Fried Frailty Index (FFI) and a cancer-specific geriatric assessment (GA) to predict chemotherapy toxicity and overall survival (OS). METHODS: We conducted a multi-site pilot study of 50 patients with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC, age ≥ 18 years. All participants received carboplatin AUC 6, paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. FFI and the GA were administered prior to chemotherapy. A GA toxicity risk score was calculated. Grade 3-5 toxicity was assessed during 1st two cycles of chemotherapy. OS was measured from chemotherapy initiation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate the association between baseline characteristics and toxicity and OS respectively. RESULTS: Among 50 participants, 48 received chemotherapy and were evaluable. The mean age was 68.5 y (range 42-86), 79% male, 85% KPS ≥80. The median OS was 8 months. Many (27%) met FFI criteria for frailty with ≥3 impairments. Impairments detected by the GA were common. In multivariable analyses both FFI ≥ 3 and GA toxicity risk score > 7 were independently associated with higher odds of toxicity (Odds ratio [OR] 7.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-44.6 and OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.0-17.7, respectively) in first cycle chemotherapy. Neither score was associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty predicts chemotherapy toxicity during first cycle. Frailty assessment may inform toxicity risk regardless of chronologic age.

Definitive radiation with concurrent cetuximab vs. radiation with or without concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy in older patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Analysis of the SEER-medicare linked database.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate OS and toxicity after definitive radiation with concurrent cetuximab (CTX-RT) compared to radiation with concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy (CRT) in older HNSCC patients via the SEER-Medicare linked database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the SEER-Medicare linked database to evaluate OS in HNSCC patients (Oropharynx, Larynx, Hypopharynx, Nasopharynx) diagnosed over 2005-2011, following FDA approval of cetuximab in combination with radiation therapy (RT) in March 2006. RESULTS: 2135 beneficiaries were identified. Median age was 73 (66-104) years. Primary was oropharynx (61%), hypopharynx (15%), nasopharynx (5%), and larynx (19%). CRT was platinum based in 82% of patients. CTX-RT was associated with worse OS compared to CRT (P < 0.005), and similar OS to RT (P = 0.21); 5-year OS was 46% for CRT, 35% for CTX-RT, 32% for RT. Patients were more likely to receive CTX-RT vs. CRT if they had oropharyngeal vs nasopharyngeal primary, Charlson comorbidity index 2 vs 0, older age at diagnosis. Multivariable Cox regression showed that CTX-RT was associated with a higher risk of death compared to CRT (hazard ratio = 1.23, 1.07-1.42; p = 0.005), after stratifying by stage and primary site, and adjusting for gender, race, age, income, Charlson comorbidity index, marital status, hospital type, and year of diagnosis. There were no differences in dysphagia, gastrostomy tube placement, pneumonia, and weight loss over the first 12 months after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations to comparative effectiveness evaluation in population-based registries, our data suggest that cytotoxic chemotherapy should be used with RT for eligible older HNSCC patients.