Impact of Lung Cancer on Health-Related Quality of Life, Financial Toxicity, and Household Economics in Patients From the Public and the Private Healthcare Sector in Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is Argentina's first cause of cancer death. Most patients have an advanced stage at diagnosis, with poor expected survival. This study aimed to characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and economic impact of patients treated in the private healthcare sector and compare it with that of the public sector. METHODS: We undertook an observational cross-sectional study that extended a previous study to a referral private center in Argentina. Outcomes included the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L (to assess HRQOL), Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (financial toxicity instrument), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - General Health (to assess productivity loss), and out-of-pocket expenses in adults diagnosed of NSCLC. RESULTS: We included 30 consecutive patients from a private healthcare center (July 2021 to March 2022), totaling 131 patients (n = 101 from previous public study). The whole sample had low quality of life and relevant economic impact. Patients in the private healthcare sector showed lower disease severity and higher educational level and household income. In addition, private healthcare system patients showed higher utility (0.77 vs 0.73; P < .05) and lower impairment of daily activities (41% vs 59%; P = .01). Private health system patients also showed lower financial toxicity as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity score (23.9 vs 20.14; P < .05) but showed no differences when financial toxicity was assessed as a dichotomic variable. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with NSCLC treated in a private healthcare center in Argentina showed a relevant HRQOL and economic impact, this impact was smaller than the one observed in publicly funded hospitals.

Lung Cancer Survivorship: Physical, Social, Emotional, and Medical Needs of NSCLC Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Newer therapies prolong survival for patients with lung cancer. Beyond extending survival, the needs of lung cancer (LC) survivors are poorly described. METHODS: We conducted a single-institution needs assessment survey of LC survivors alive ≥1 year from diagnosis. Needs were rated on a 5-point Likert scale for 4 domains (physical, social, emotional, and medical). Multiple regression models identified demographic or treatment characteristics associated with more needs in each category. A subset analysis of survivors with metastatic LC was performed. RESULTS: Of 360 patients approached, 235 surveys were completed. Among completed survey respondents, the median age was 69 years; most were female (62%), married (71%), and White (74%); and 41% had stage IV cancer. Finding support resources (34%) was the most common medical need. Fatigue (70%), sleep disturbance (60%), memory and concentration (57.5%), weakness (54%), and trouble breathing (51%) were physical needs affecting more than half of respondents. The most common social need was managing daily activities (42%). Emotional needs were highly prevalent, with 79% of respondents reporting a fear of recurrence and 74.5% reporting living with uncertainty. Multiple regression analysis identified that receipt of multiple lines of systemic therapy and lower household income were associated with higher physical and social needs. Younger age was associated with having a greater number of social and emotional needs. Similar results were found in the subset of survivors with metastatic disease at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The needs of LC survivors are diverse across multiple domains. Several clinical and demographic factors are independently associated with higher numbers of patient-reported needs. Our study identifies critical gaps in survivorship care for LC survivors with all stages of disease and highlights areas of future intervention.

Characteristics, management, and healthcare resources of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer surviving 5 years after nivolumab treatment initiation: A national database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data on long-term survivors with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab are available from randomized trials. Characteristics, management, and healthcare resources of those patients need to be confirmed with real-world data. METHODS: The UNIVOC retrospective observational study included all patients with advanced NSCLC recorded in the French national hospital database starting nivolumab in 2015 and followed them until December 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated the overall survival (OS). A machine learning approach identified patients with similar treatment sequences. RESULTS: Within the 3,050 patients who had nivolumab initiation,5-year OS rate was 14.6 % (95 %CI 13.3 %-16.2 %). In total, data covering at least 5 years of follow-up were retrieved for 231 surviving patients. Survivors were younger, often female and had fewer comorbidities than non-survivors. Three clusters of patients with different nivolumab treatment durations were identified: 1/ Continuous nivolumab treatment; 2/ Long period of nivolumab treatment followed by chemotherapy or no treatment; 3/ Short period of nivolumab treatment then chemotherapy or no treatment. At 5 years, 61.0 % of survivors were no longer receiving systemic therapy, 26.4 % were treated with nivolumab, 8.7 % chemotherapy, and 3.9 % other immunotherapies. Among 5-y survivor patients, the average number of hospitalisations per patient decreased from 23.4 to 12.8 between the 1st and the 5th year. In the 5th year, 46 % of patients had no more hospitalization for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This large nationwide study confirms the long-term benefit of nivolumab treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in the real-world setting, with a 5-year survival rate similar to that reported in clinical trials.

Biomarkers-Based Cost-Effectiveness of Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Patients with Treatment-Naive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the cost-effectiveness of first-line toripalimab plus chemotherapy (TC) for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), excluding patients with nonsquamous NSCLC and EGFR/ALK mutations. It further analyzed the cost-effectiveness of this strategy in biomarker-based subgroups, all within the context of the Chinese healthcare system. METHODS: Eighteen Markov models with 21-day Markov cycle lengths and 30-year time horizons were constructed in this study. Clinical effectiveness data were derived from the CHOICE-01 trial. Health state utilities and costs data were obtained from various sources. The primary outputs were the calculation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which were then compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $17,961 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). This comparison was used to determine the treatment that offered greater cost-effectiveness. To account for uncertainty in the model, sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: For the overall patient population, the estimated ICER between first-line TC and placebo plus chemotherapy (PC) was $9445/QALY, significantly lower than the WTP threshold used in the model. In subgroups based on pathologic types, first-line TC had an ICER of $16,757/QALY for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, slightly below the WTP threshold; first-line TC demonstrated dominance in patients with squamous NSCLC, indicating both better effectiveness and lower costs compared to first-line PC. In biomarkers-based subgroups, first-line TC was dominant over first-line PC in the subgroups with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% and SMARCA4 mutations. Moreover, first-line TC had ICERs lower than the WTP threshold in other subgroups, except for the subgroup with RB1 mutations. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings. CONCLUSION: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, this study's findings suggested that first-line TC represents a cost-effective strategy for patients with advanced NSCLC. However, the cost-effectiveness of first-line TC varied across different subgroups when considering predictive biomarkers.

Trends in cost of treatment of lung cancer patients in 2014-2019 in Finland - a descriptive register study.

AIM: The aim of this descriptive study is to analyze the cost for the treatment of NSCLC and SCLC patients (2014-2019) in Finland. The primary objective is to understand recent (2014-2019) cost developments. METHODS: The study is retrospective and based on hospital register data. The study population consists of NSCLC and SCLC patients diagnosed in four out of the five Finnish university hospitals. The final sample included 4047 NSCLC patients and 766 SCLC patients. RESULTS: Cost of the treatment in lung cancer is increasing. Both the average cost of the first 12 months as well as the first 24 months after diagnosis increases over time. For patients diagnosed in 2014, the average cost of the first 24 months was 19,000 €and for those diagnosed in 2015 22,000 €. The annual increase in the nominal 24-month costs was 10.4% for NSCLC and 7.3% for SCLC patients. CONCLUSION: The average cost per patient has increased annually for both NSCLC and SCLC. Possible explanations to the cost increase are increased medicine costs (especially in NSCLC), and the increased percentage of patients being actively treated.

Assessment of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Survival and Cardiovascular Outcomes of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Taiwan.

Importance: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been recognized as the standard treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sequence variation. Although TKIs have been reported to cause cardiotoxicity, they are widely administered owing to the high prevalence of EGFR sequence variation in Taiwan. Objective: To compare the outcomes of death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events among patients with NSCLC who use and do not use TKIs in a national cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using data from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database and National Cancer Registry, patients treated for NSCLC from 2011 to 2018 were identified, and their outcomes were analyzed, including death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs; such as heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke) after adjusting for age, sex, cancer stage, comorbidities, anticancer therapies, and cardiovascular drugs. The median follow-up duration was 1.45 years. The analyses were performed from September 2022 to March 2023. Exposures: TKIs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate death and MACCEs in patients treated with and without TKIs. Given that death may reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events, the competing risk method was used to calculate the MACCE risk after adjustment for all potential confounders. Results: Overall, 24 129 patients treated with TKIs were matched with 24 129 patients who did not receive TKIs (24 215 [50.18%] were female; and the mean [SD] age was 66.93 [12.37] years). Compared with those not receiving TKIs, the TKI group presented with a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause death (adjusted HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75-0.78; P < .001), and the reason for death was primarily cancer. In contrast, the HR of MACCEs significantly increased (subdistribution HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.16-1.29; P < .001) in the TKI group. Furthermore, afatinib use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death among patients receiving various TKIs (adjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.94; P < .001) compared with those receiving erlotinib and gefitinib, although the outcomes of MACCEs were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with NSCLC, TKI use was associated with reduced HRs of cancer-related death but increased HRs of MACCEs. These findings suggest the importance of close monitoring of cardiovascular problems in individuals receiving TKIs.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant atezolizumab for patients with stage II-IIIA PD-L1+ non-small-cell lung cancer.

Aim: Atezolizumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) versus best supportive care (BSC) as adjuvant treatment following resection and platinum-based chemotherapy for stage II-IIIA PD-L1+ NSCLC in IMpower010. Materials & methods: This cost-effectiveness study evaluated atezolizumab versus BSC (US commercial payer perspective) using a Markov model with DFS, locoregional recurrence, first- and second-line metastatic recurrence and death health states, and a lifetime time horizon with 3% annual discounting. Results: Atezolizumab provided 1.045 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) at an incremental cost of $48,956, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $46,859/QALY. Scenario analysis showed similar findings in a Medicare population ($48,512/QALY). Conclusion: At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $46,859/QALY, atezolizumab is cost-effective versus BSC for adjuvant NSCLC treatment.

Atezolizumab treatment is 'cost-effective' for people in the USA with stage II­IIIA PD-L1+ non-small-cell lung cancer after surgery and chemotherapy. Until recently, people whose doctors told them they have stage II­IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression on ≥1% of tumor cells (known as 'PD-L1+') did not have many treatment options beyond chemotherapy after surgery. Their cancer often returns even after chemotherapy. One treatment called atezolizumab showed good survival results in clinical trials and is approved in the USA for treatment after the lung tumor has been removed in surgery. Understanding how better survival and quality of life is related to the costs of treatment (known as 'cost­effectiveness') is important. For example, insurance companies in the USA may use this information to decide what cancer drugs are preferred for insurance coverage. This study found that atezolizumab treatment was 'cost-effective' for people in the USA with stage II­IIIA PD-L1+ non-small-cell lung cancer when it was given after surgery and chemotherapy.

Brain imaging in lung cancer staging: A real-world, multi-centre study of prevalence of brain metastases, impact on treatment and re-modelling of the NICE health economic analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In 2019, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated their recommendations with respect to brain imaging in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on an analytic cost-effectiveness model using published data and modelling assumptions from committee experts. In this study, we aimed to re-run this model using real-world multi-centre UK data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data was collected on consecutive patients with radically treatable clinical stage II and III lung cancer from eleven acute NHS Trusts during the calendar year 01/01/2018 to 31/12/2018. Following a written application to the NICE lung cancer guideline committee, we were granted access to the NG122 brain imaging economic model for the purpose of updating the input parameters in line with the real-world findings from this study. RESULTS: A total of 444 patients had data for analysis. The combined prevalence of occult brain metastases was 6.2% (10/165) in stage II and 6% (17/283) in stage III, compared to 9.5% and 9.3% used in the NICE economic model. 30% of patients with clinical stage III NSCLC and occult BMs on pre-treatment imaging went onto complete the planned curative intent treatment of extracranial disease, 60% completed SRS to the brain and 30% completed WBRT. This compares to 0%, 10% and 0% in the NICE assumptions. The health economic analysis concluded that brain imaging was no longer cost-effective in stage II disease (ICERs £50,023-£115,785) whilst brain imaging remained cost-effective for stage III patients (ICERs 17,000-£22,173), with MRI being the most cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSION: This re-running of the NICE health economic model with real-world data strongly supports the NICE guideline recommendation for brain imaging prior to curative-intent treatment in stage III lung cancer but questions the cost-effectiveness of CT brain imaging prior to curative-intent treatment in stage II lung cancer.

Two-scale assessment of anxiety and depression in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients: their prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic potency.

OBJECTIVE: Anxiety and depression commonly occur and correlate with poor prognosis in patients with cancer. The study aimed to assess the anxiety and depression in patients with postsurgical non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using both Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Self-Rating Anxiety/Depression Scale (SAS/SDS) and to investigate their risk factors and linkage with prognosis. METHODS: HADS and SAS/SDS were assessed in 350 patients with NSCLC at 3 months after surgical resection and 100 healthy controls (HCs). Patients with NSCLC were followed up for a median period of 27.0 (range: 6.0-52.0) months for prognostic evaluation. RESULTS: HADS-identified anxiety rate (39.7% vs. 10.0%, P < 0.001), SAS-identified anxiety rate (34.9% vs. 9.0%, P < 0.001), HADS-identified depression rate (29.7% vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001), and SDS-identified depression rate (27.1% vs. 6.0%, P < 0.001) were all elevated in patients with NSCLC vs. HCs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis uncovered that diabetes, adjuvant therapy, postoperative complications, and poor differentiation were independently linked with increased HADS- or SAS-identified anxiety risk (all P < 0.05); meanwhile, female gender, hypertension, diabetes, poor differentiation, adjuvant therapy, postoperative complications, and TNM stage were independently linked with increased HADS- or SDS-identified depression risk (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, HADS-identified anxiety, SAS-identified anxiety, HADS-identified depression, and SDS-identified depression independently predicted shorter disease-free survival and overall survival (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Anxiety and depression are prevalent and linked with poor survival in patients with postsurgical NSCLC. Meanwhile, gender, comorbidities, advanced tumor features, adjuvant therapy, and postoperative complications relate to the prevalence of anxiety and depression.

Real-world adjuvant chemotherapy patterns and outcomes among elderly patients with resected early non-small-cell lung cancer in the USA.

Background: This study investigated real-world treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in early non-small-cell lung cancer patients and the association between OS and time-to-adjuvant-treatment. Materials & methods: This retrospective study using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data linked with Medicare claims included resected early non-small-cell lung cancer patients between 2010 and 2015. Unadjusted OS analyses used Kaplan-Meier curves; adjusted OS analyses used extended Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Only 54-71% of stage II-IIIA patients received any adjuvant treatment. Adjusted risk of death was higher when starting treatment outside 6-8 weeks after surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Improved systemic therapy in the adjuvant chemotherapy setting is needed.

Lung cancer is one of the deadliest cancers in the USA. Most lung cancers are a type called non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with NSCLC that has not spread to other parts of the body generally have surgery and may receive treatment before surgery, after surgery or both to help fight the cancer. It is not clear how often people receive treatment before or after surgery. It is important to know how patients are being treated because it helps clinicians decide how to use the new treatments that are becoming available. This study used a large database of more than 7000 people aged 65 years and older with lung cancer in the USA to understand how they are treated. More than a third of patients had stage IA NSCLC (39%), followed by stage IB (24%), stage II (20%), stage IIIA (15%) and stage IIIB (2%). Most people had surgery (64%) and some received another treatment after surgery (27%). That treatment was most often about 2 months of chemotherapy, on average. The study also tried to understand how the timing of treatment may have been important for their survival. People who received treatment after surgery lived the longest if they received that treatment about 6­8 weeks after the surgery. Overall, the study showed that a substantial proportion of people do not receive treatment for their NSCLC after surgery, even though treatment after surgery is recommended by medical guidelines. There is a need for more effective treatments for these patients, and when those treatments are given may be important for their survival.

Variation in Use of Lung Cancer Targeted Therapies Across State Medicaid Programs, 2020-2021.

Importance: Targeted therapies for EGFR (OMIM 131550)- and ALK (OMIM 105590)-altered metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) substantially improve outcomes for some patients. However, use of these therapies is lower among Medicaid patients, and access to oncology care varies across state Medicaid programs. Evidence is lacking on how use of targeted therapies for metastatic NSCLC varies across state Medicaid programs. Objectives: To characterize state-level variation in the use of targeted therapies among Medicaid patients with metastatic NSCLC and to describe factors associated with this variation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the Medicaid Drug Utilization Database from 2020 and 2021 and peer-reviewed data on NSCLC incidence, the prevalence of EGFR and ALK alterations, and expected treatment durations to estimate expected use of targeted therapies for EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC in 33 states. Exposures: State-specific Medicaid programs and state policies and characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the estimated proportion of person-time of Medicaid patients with EGFR- or ALK-altered NSCLC associated with receipt of targeted therapy in each state Medicaid program. Nested linear regression models examined associations between the observed variation and state policies and characteristics. Results: There were an estimated 3461 person-years in which EGFR- and ALK-targeted therapies were indicated in 2020 and 2021. During these years, only 2281 person-years of EGFR- and ALK-targeted therapies were dispensed to Medicaid patients, suggesting that an estimated 66% of Medicaid patients with EGFR- and ALK-altered metastatic disease received indicated targeted therapies across all states. Rates of targeted therapy use ranged from 18% in Arkansas to 113% in Massachusetts; 30 of 33 states (91%) had lower rates of targeted therapy use than expected. The observed variation across state Medicaid programs was associated with Medicaid policies, the density of oncologists, and state gross domestic product per capita. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that rates of targeted therapy use among Medicaid patients with EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC were lower than expected and varied across state Medicaid programs. State policies and characteristics were associated with the observed variation, indicating where interventions could improve access to treatment and outcomes for patients with NSCLC.

Modeling Costs and Life-Years Gained by Population-Wide Next-Generation Sequencing or Single-Gene Testing in Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.

PURPOSE: Many patients with actionable driver oncogenes (ADOs) are never identified and thus never receive targeted treatment. This study evaluated the economic impact and the potential life-years gained (LYG) that can be attributed to the extent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in the United States compared with single-gene testing (SGT) in patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer in the United States. METHODS: A model was developed to evaluate incremental rates of SGT or NSG testing on the basis of LYG and cost per LYG. ADOs included for NGS included EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, RET, MET, and NTRK. SGT included EGFR and ALK. Assumptions were made for expected incidence of ADOs. Survival distributions were fit to published trial averages of median and 5-year overall survival. Treatment costs were estimated from drug cost averages. Reimbursement costs were based on data from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. RESULTS: Each incremental 10% increase in NGS testing produces an average of 2,627.4 additional LYG, with an average cost savings per LYG of $75 US dollars (USD). Replacing SGT at the current rate of 80% with NGS testing would result in an average additional 21,09.6 LYG and reduce cost per LYG by an average of $599 USD. If 100% of eligible patients were tested with NGS and each identified patient had matched treatment, the total average cost per LYG would be $16,641.57 USD. CONCLUSION: On the basis of current evidence, population-level simulations demonstrate that clinically relevant gains in survival with non-negligible reduction in costs are obtainable from widespread adoption of NGS testing and appropriate treatment matching for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Assessment of RANK/RANK-L prevalence and clinical significance in NSCLC European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape cohort and SPLENDOUR randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of RANK/L expression, in both a retrospective cohort of surgically resected stage I-III NSCLC (Lungscape) and a randomized clinical trial-cohort (SPLENDOUR) of advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy alone or in combination with denosumab. METHODS: RANK-L expression was assessed on tissue microarrays (TMAs) in Lungscape and whole sections in SPLENDOUR, using immunohistochemistry, with H-scores values > 0 indicating positivity. Prevalence of RANK positivity and its association with clinicopathological characteristics, and patient outcome was explored in a subset of the ETOP Lungscape cohort and in SPLENDOUR. Also investigated were the prevalence of RANK overexpression (proportion of positive cancer cells ≥ 50%) in the Lungscape cohort, and RANK-L in the SPLENDOUR trial. RESULTS: In the Lungscape cohort, RANK expression was assessed at a median follow-up of 46 months (N = 488 patients; 4 centers); 35% were female, 44/49/6% adenocarcinomas (AC)/squamous cell carcinomas (SCC)/other, 48/27/25% with stage I/II/III. Median RFS/TTR/OS were 58/Not reached/74 months. Prevalence of RANK expression was 31% (95%CI:27%-35%); significantly higher in AC: 50% (95%CI:43%-57%) vs SCC: 12% (95%CI:8%-16%) (p < 0.001); more frequent in females (42% vs 25%, p < 0.001) and tumors ≤ 4 cm (35.3% vs 23.3%, p = 0.0065). No association with outcome was found. In the SPLENDOUR trial (463 patients), the prevalence of membranous and cytoplasmic RANK positivity was 34% (95%CI:30%-38%) and 9% (95%CI:7%-12%), respectively, while prevalence for RANK-L was 5% (95%CI:3%-7%) and 36% (95%CI:31%-40%), respectively. Cytoplasmic RANK-L positivity was more common among females (47% vs 31%, p = 0.001) and in non-SCC histology (45% vs 10%, p < 0.0001). At the pre-specified 1% significance level, no prognostic or predictive effect was found. CONCLUSIONS: Both cohorts indicate that RANK expression is more common in adenocarcinoma/non-squamous NSCLC and in female patients. No prognostic effect is found, and in the clinical trial involving addition of denosumab to chemotherapy no predictive effect is detected.

Measuring the indirect cost associated with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study in China.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to estimate the indirect cost of locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without sensitizing EGFR and ALK alterations in China and explore the predictors from both patient and caregiver perspectives. METHODS: Data were obtained from a nationwide cross-sectional study for the patients with advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB-IV) and their caregivers. Indirect medical cost was estimated as health productivity loss based on self-reported income and loss of work time. The generalized linear model was used to assess the independent associations between statistically significant variables and indirect economic burden. RESULTS: 611 pairs of patients and patient caregivers from 13 medical centers in five provinces in China participated in this investigation. The indirect medical cost associated with advanced NSCLC since the patient diagnosed was $1413 per capita in China. General linear regression results showed that the indirect medical cost was significantly influenced by duration of disease since diagnosis, treatment options, caregivers' occupation and age (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The indirect economic burden linked to advanced NSCLC in China is considerable on patients, and their caregivers. To minimize the severe challenges of indirect economic burden related to advanced NSCLC, expanding the coverage of the medical insurance and assistance system to reimburse part of the indirect costs related to cancer, as well as strengthening the accessibility for more effective therapies to improve the prognosis of advanced NSCLC, and further promote the patients and their caregivers to return to work or normal life may be the potentially feasible approaches.

Cardiac Adverse Events Associated With Chemo-Radiation Versus Chemotherapy for Resectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Study.

Background We compared cardiac outcomes for surgery-eligible patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated adjuvantly or neoadjuvantly with chemotherapy versus chemo-radiation therapy in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database. Methods and Results Patients were age 66+, had stage IIIA/B resectable non-small-cell lung cancer diagnosed between 2007 and 2015, and received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemo-radiation within 121 days of diagnosis. Patients having chemo-radiation and chemotherapy only were propensity-score matched and followed from day 121 to first cardiac outcome, noncardiac death, radiation initiation by patients who received chemotherapy only, fee-for-service enrollment interruption, or December 31, 2016. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and competing risks subdistribution HRs were estimated. The primary outcome was the first of these severe cardiac events: acute myocardial infarction, other hospitalized ischemic heart disease, hospitalized heart failure, percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass graft, cardiac death, or urgent/inpatient care for pericardial disease, conduction abnormality, valve disorder, or ischemic heart disease. With median follow-up of 13 months, 70 of 682 patients who received chemo-radiation (10.26%) and 43 of 682 matched patients who received chemotherapy only (6.30%) developed a severe cardiac event (P=0.008) with median time to first event 5.45 months. Chemo-radiation increased the rate of severe cardiac events (cause-specific HR: 1.62 [95% CI, 1.11-2.37] and subdistribution HR: 1.41 [95% CI, 0.97-2.04]). Cancer severity appeared greater among patients who received chemo-radiation (noncardiac death cause-specific HR, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.93-3.33] and subdistribution HR, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.90-3.33]). Conclusions Adding radiation therapy to chemotherapy is associated with an increased risk of severe cardiac events among patients with resectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer for whom survival benefit of radiation therapy is unclear.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab vs. placebo, in combination with chemotherapy, for treatment of first-line metastatic NSCLC in China.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab plus chemotherapy (SC) vs. placebo plus chemotherapy (PC), as the first-line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. Material and methods: A three-state Markov model with a cycle of 3 weeks was built to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SC vs. PC as first-line treatment for patients with NSCLC over a 10-year horizon from Chinese health care perspective. Time-dependency transition probability and safety data were derived from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial performed in China (GEMSTONE-302). Primary model outcomes included the costs in US dollars and health outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the ICER under a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $37,663/QALYs. Deterministic, scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were employed to investigate the robustness of model outcomes. Results: In base-case analysis, compared with PC, first-line SC for intention-to-treat (ITT) population gained an additional 0.57 QALYs with an incremental cost of $62,404.15, resulting in an ICER of $109,480.97/QALYs gained. When a patient assistance program (PAP) was available, the ICER decreased to $52,327.02/QALYs. In subgroup analysis, the ICER values were above the WTP threshold with or without PAP. Sensitivity analysis results suggested that the model outcomes were reliable. Conclusion: From the perspective of Chinese healthcare system, the SC was not cost-effective in comparison to PC as first-line treatment for NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 tumor expression level and pathological subtype.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Because of its low immunogenicity and associated risk of toxicity, sugemalimab is expected to reshape the first-line treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. However, it remains unclear whether the use of expensive sugemalimab is cost-effective in this population. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed based on the GEMSTONE-302 study to assess the efficacy of sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC. Efficacy and safety data were entered, with costs and utility values derived from the literature, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated, and univariate sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. We also considered cost-effectiveness in two different treatment regimen scenarios after disease progression. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy, patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with sugemalimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy saw an increase of 0.56 life-years (LYs) and 0.41 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and patients with squamous NSCLC resulted in an ICER per QALY of $45,280.02. Patients with nonsquamous metastatic NSCLC resulted in an ICER of $45,294.15 per QALY. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that disease-free survival utility had the greatest impact on the results. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) showed that when the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for QALYs was $27,354/QALY, sugemalimab, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, was more cost-effective than the placebo. CONCLUSION: From a Chinese health care system perspective, first-line treatment of squamous or nonsquamous metastatic NSCLC with sugemalimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy may have cost-effectiveness compared with placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy at a WTP threshold of $27,354/QALY.

Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on the management of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in real-life practice in patients initiating treatment between 2015 and 2018 in France and Germany.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in France and Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with aNSCLC without known ALK or EGFR mutations receiving first-line (1L) therapy were included from (i) the retrospective Epidemiological-Strategy and Medical Economics Advanced and Metastatic Lung Cancer cohort (ESME-AMLC, France; 2015-2018) and (ii) the prospective Clinical Research platform Into molecular testing, treatment and outcome of non-Small cell lung carcinoma Patients platform (CRISP, Germany; 2016-2018). Analyses were stratified according to histology. Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and stratified by year of 1L therapy. Data sources were analysed separately. RESULTS: In ESME-AMLC and CRISP, 8,046 and 2,359 patients were included in the study, respectively. In both countries, approximately 20 % of all patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy as 1L treatment in 2018. In ESME-AMLC, the proportion receiving an ICI over the course of treatment (any line) increased from 42.2 % (2015) to 56.1 % (2018) in patients with squamous histology, and 28.9 % to 51.9 % with non-squamous/other; in CRISP, it increased from 50.6 % (2016) to 65.2 % (2018) with squamous histology, and 40.8 % to 62.7 % with non-squamous/other. Two-year overall survival from 1L initiation was 36.8 % and 25.6 % in the squamous cohorts and 36.5 % and 30.8 % in the non-squamous/other cohorts in ESME-AMLC and CRISP, respectively. No significant change in overall survival was observed over time; however, the follow-up time available was limited in the later years of the analysis. CONCLUSION: The results of this joint research from two large clinical databases in France and Germany demonstrate the growing use of ICIs in the management of aNSCLC. Future analyses will allow for the evaluation of the impact of ICIs on long-term survival of patients with aNSCLC.

Assessment of treatment strategies for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in patients with comorbidities.

INTRODUCTION: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients frequently have major comorbidities but there is scarce data regarding the impact of these conditions on management strategies. We used simulation modeling to compare different treatments for stage I NSCLC for patients with common major comorbidities. METHODS: We used data on NSCLC patinet outcomes and quality of life from: (1) the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database linked to Medicare claims; (2) Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health records; and (3) SEER-Medical Health Outcomes Survey to parameterize a novel simulation model of management and outcomes for stage I NSCLC. Relative efficacy of treatment modalities (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge resection and stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]) was collected from existing literature and combined using evidence synthesis methods. We then simulated multiple randomized trials comparing these treatments in a variety of scenarios, estimating quality adjusted life expectancy (QALE) according to age, tumor size, histologic subtype, and comorbidity status. RESULTS: Lobectomy and segmentectomy yielded the greatest QALE gains among all simulated age, tumor size and comorbidity groups. Optimal treatment strategies differed by patient sex and age; wedge resection was among the optimal strategies for women aged 80-84 with tumors 0-2 cm in size. SBRT was included in some optimal strategies for patients aged 80-84 with multimorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In simulated comparative trials of four common treatments for stage I NSCLC, aggressive surgical management was typically associated with the greatest projected QALE gains despite the presence of comorbidities, although less aggressive strategies were predicted to be non-inferior in some older comorbid patient groups.

Evolving trends in lung cancer: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

Lung cancer is one of the deadliest cancers globally and accounts for most of the cancer-related deaths in India. Comprehensive data on lung cancer in India are lacking. This review aimed to discuss the epidemiological trends of lung cancers and driver mutations as well as the recent advancements in molecular diagnostics and therapeutic options primarily in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in India. Electronic databases, such as PubMed and Google Scholar, were searched to retrieve the relevant literature published in the past 5 years. As per the GLOBOCAN 2018 report, lung cancer was ranked the fourth leading cause of cancer (5.9% cases) in India, in all ages and sexes. Furthermore, 63,475 of all cancer-related deaths (8.1%) were attributed to lung cancer (cumulative risk 0.60), making it the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The common mutations that have been detected and targeted for treatment in lung cancer patients include EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1. In India, EGFR and ALK mutations are commonly reported, but not PD-L1 mutation. Molecular testing has gained importance as several biomarkers are being targeted to diagnose lung cancer patients. Surgery, radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and personalized molecular-targeted therapy prolong the overall survival (OS) in patients with NSCLC. Although chemotherapy and molecular-targeted therapies have greatly improved the clinical outcomes, prolonged disease control could not be attained in most NSCLC patients. In this situation, immunotherapy seems to be potentially beneficial to obtain long-lasting disease control with minimal adverse events or safety concerns.