RESUMO
PURPOSE: This observational study aims to assess the feasibility of calculating indicators developed by the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) for the Dutch breast cancer population. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer between 2012 and 2018 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Outcomes of the quality indicators (QI) were presented as mean scores and were compared to a stated norm. Variation between hospitals was assessed by standard deviations and funnel plots and trends over time were evaluated. The quality indicator calculator (QIC) was validated by comparing these outcomes with the outcomes of constructed algorithms in Stata. RESULTS: In total, 133,527 patients were included. Data for 24 out of 26 QIs were available in the NCR. For 67% and 67% of the QIs, a mean score above the norm and low or medium hospital variation was observed, respectively. The proportion of patients undergoing a breast reconstruction or neoadjuvant systemic therapy increased over time. The proportion treated within 4 weeks from diagnosis, having >10 lymph nodes removed or estrogen negative breast cancer who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy decreased. The outcomes of the constructed algorithms in this study and the QIC showed 100% similarity. CONCLUSION: Data from the NCR could be used for the calculation of more than 92% of the ECIBC indicators. The quality of breast cancer care in the Netherlands is high, as more than half of the QIs already score above the norm and medium hospital variation was observed. The QIC can be easy and reliably applied.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Mama in situ , Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , HospitaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There has been no comprehensive study determining the financial burden of breast cancer in the South African (SA) public sector. OBJECTIVES: To develop a method to determine the cost of breast cancer treatment with chemotherapy per episode of care and to quantify the associated costs relating to chemotherapy at Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH), a government hospital in SA. These costs included costs associated with the management of adverse events arising from chemotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective patient-level data were collected for 200 patients from electronic databases and patient folders between 2013 and 2015. Direct medical costs were determined from the health funder's perspective. The information collected was categorised into the following cost components: chemotherapy medicines, support medicines, administration of chemotherapy, laboratory tests, radiology scans and imaging, doctor consultations and adverse events. Time-and-motion studies were conducted on a set of new patients and the data obtained were used for the study sample of 200 patients. All the above costs were used to determine the cost of chemotherapy per episode of care. The episode of care was defined as the care provided from 2 months prior to the date of commencing chemotherapy (pre-chemotherapy phase), during chemotherapy (treatment phase) and until 6 months after the date when the last cycle of chemotherapy was administered (follow-up phase). RESULTS: A method was developed to determine the episode-of-care costs for breast cancer at GSH. The total direct medical cost for treatment of breast cancer at GSH for 200 patients was ZAR3 154 877, and the average episode-of-care cost per patient was ZAR15 774. The average cost of management of adverse events arising from the various treatment modalities was ZAR13 133 per patient. It was found that the cost of treating a patient with adverse events was 1.8 times higher than the cost of treating a patient without adverse events. Of the patients, 86.5% managed to complete their prescribed chemotherapy treatment cycles, and the average cost of treatment of these patients was 1.3 times more than the average cost for patients who could not complete their treatment, based on the number of treatment cycles received. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive method to determine the costs associated with breast cancer management per episode of care was developed, and costs were quantified at GSH according to the treatment protocol used at the hospital.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/economia , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Lobular/tratamento farmacológico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/economia , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/economia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/economia , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/economia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Diagnóstico por Imagem/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Periódico , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/economia , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Honorários por Prescrição de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , África do Sul , Estudos de Tempo e Movimento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the presence of screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) correlates for suspicious lesions detected on pre-operative staging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. METHODS: After approval from the institutional review board (IRB), screening DBTs on breast cancer patients with BI-RADS 4 or 5 staging MRI exams between 8/1/17 and 8/1/18 were assessed for presence of DBT correlates for suspicious MRI findings. The pathology of the index lesion, type of additional MRI finding (mass, non-mass enhancement, or focus), correlative finding on tomosynthesis (mass, asymmetry/focal asymmetry, distortion, or calcifications), size on MRI and tomosynthesis, breast density, and pathology of the additional lesion were recorded. The chi-square test of association was used unless otherwise specified. Confidence intervals for proportions were estimated using the Wilson's score method. RESULTS: 17/70 (24%) of additional lesions seen on pre-operative MRI exams in patients with newly diagnosed cancer had a mammographic correlate on corresponding screening DBT. There was no significant relationship between the presence of a mammographic correlate and the type of MRI finding (mass, NME, or focus), breast density, size of lesion, pathology of index cancer, or pathology of the additional lesion (p≥â¯0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 76% of additional lesions seen on pre-operative staging MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer are not seen retrospectively on screening DBT. Since about 24% of MRI-detected additional lesions may have a DBT correlate, DBT exams should be reviewed in patients recalled for further workup of findings seen on pre-operative MRI since this may facilitate DBT-guided biopsy of suspicious lesions, which is preferable to MRI-guided biopsy for cost and patient comfort reasons.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Mama in situ/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Densidade da Mama/fisiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Mamografia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
There have been arguments about the role of breast cancer screening at the population level, and some points of controversy have arisen, such the establishment of organized screening policies and the age at which to begin screening. The real benefit of screening has been questioned because the results of this practice may increase the diagnosis of indolent lesions without decreasing mortality due to breast cancer. The authors have proposed a study of incidence and mortality trends for breast cancer in a developing setting in Brazil to monitor the effectiveness of the official recommendations that prioritize the age group from 50 to 69 years. The database of the Cancer Registry and the Mortality Information System was used to calculate age-standardized and age-specific rates, which were then used to calculate incidence and mortality trends using the Joinpoint Regression Program. The results showed stability in trends across all ages and age-specific groups in both incidence and mortality. In conclusion, we found that incidence and mortality rates are compatible with those in regions with similar human development indexes, and trends have demonstrated stabilization. Thus, we do not endorse changes in the official recommendations to conduct screening for ages other than 50 to 69 years, nor should policy makers implement organized screening strategies.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Mama in situ/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Brasil , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) assessment across breast MRI sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained and the requirement for consent was waived. Three radiologists qualitatively categorized BPE on 150 breast MRI using a four-point scale (minimal, mild, moderate or marked) according to BI-RADS category system. According to MR-sequence used for the assessment of BPE, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability across a simulated reading strategy with four options was performed: (1) initial contrast-enhanced (CE) fat-suppressed T1-weighted images (2) initial CE subtracted images (3) maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) of the first CE subtracted images (4) combination of initial CE fat-suppressed T1-weighted, initial CE subtracted and MIP images. Raters repeated BPE assessment of 45 breast MRI four weeks after the initial assessment. Gwet's AC1 index with ordinal weights was used to assess reliabilities. RESULTS: Gwet's index for the reliability among the three raters was 0.68 (0.63-0.74) using initial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1 weighted images, 0.74 (0.69-0.80) using subtracted images, 0.80 (0.76-0.83) using MIP, 0.80 (0.77-0.84) using a combination of the initial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1 weighted, initial contrast-enhanced subtracted and MIP images. Test-retest reliability was 0.81 (0.60-1.00) for rater 1, 0.77 (0.55-0.98) for rater 2, 0.79 (0.59-0.99) for rater 3 using the combination of initial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1 weighted, initial contrast-enhanced subtracted and MIP images. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the combination of all CE MRI images showed the highest reliability of BPE assessment. However, MIP showed a high reliability with lower reading time compared to the combination of all CE MRI images.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Mama in situ/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To build up and test a Monte Carlo simulation procedure for the investigation of overdiagnosis in breast screening programmes (BSPs). DESIGN: A Monte Carlo tool previously developed has been adapted for obtaining the quantities of interest in order to determine the overdiagnosis: the annual and cumulative number of cancers detected by screening, plus interval cancers, for a population following the BSP, and detected clinically for the same population in the absence of screening. Overdiagnosis is obtained by comparing these results in a direct way. RESULTS: Overdiagnosis between 7% and 20%, depending on the specific configuration of the programme, have been found. These range of values is in agreement with some of the results available for actual BSPs. In the cases analysed, a reduction of 11% at most has been found in the number of invasive tumours detected by screening in comparison to those clinically detected in the control population. It has been possible to establish that overdiagnosis is almost entirely linked to ductal carcinoma in situ tumours. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Monte Carlo tools may facilitate the analysis of overdiagnosis in actual BSPs, permitting to address the role played by various quantities of relevance for them.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Mama in situ/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia/efeitos adversos , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Método de Monte Carlo , Adulto , Idoso , Simulação por Computador , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , EspanhaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Around 15%-30% of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) need a reoperation due to tumor-positive margins at final histopathology. Currently available intraoperative surgical margin assessment modalities all have specific limitations. Therefore, we aimed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) as a novel method for intraoperative margin assessment in BCS. METHODS: Lumpectomy specimens from 30 consecutive patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or DCIS were imaged using a micro-CT. Margin status was assessed on micro-CT images by two investigators who were blinded to the final histopathological margin status. The micro-CT margin status was compared with the histopathological margin status. RESULTS: The margin status could be assessed by micro-CT in 29 out of 30 patients. Of these, nine patients had a positive tumor margin and 20 a negative tumor margin at final histopathology. Margin status evaluation by micro-CT took always less than 15 min. The margin status in 25 patients was correctly predicted by micro-CT. There were four false-negative predictions. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of micro-CT in margin status prediction were 86%, 56%, 100%, 100% and 83%, respectively. With micro-CT, the positive margin rate could potentially have been reduced from 31% to 14%. CONCLUSIONS: Whole lumpectomy specimen micro-CT scanning is a promising technique for intraoperative margin assessment in BCS. Intraoperative quick feedback on the margin status could potentially lead to a reduction in the number of reoperations.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Mama in situ/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Margens de Excisão , Mastectomia Segmentar , Microtomografia por Raio-X , Idoso , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Although significant progress has been made in improving breast cancer survival, disparities among racial, ethnic, and underserved groups still exist. The goal of this investigation is to quantify racial disparities in the context of breast cancer care, examining the outcomes of recurrence and mortality in the city of Memphis. Patients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of breast cancer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2012, were obtained from the tumor registry. Black patients were more likely to have advanced (II, III, or IV) clinical stage of breast cancer at diagnosis versus white patients. Black breast cancer patients had a two times higher odds of recurrence (95% confidence interval: 1.4, 3.0) after adjusting for race and clinical stage. Black breast cancer patients were 1.5 times more likely to die (95% confidence interval: 1.2, 1.8), after adjusting for race; age at diagnosis; clinical stage; ER, PR, HER2 status; and recurrence. Black women with stages 0, I, II, and III breast cancer all had a statistically significant longer median time from diagnosis to surgery than white women. Black patients were more likely to have advanced clinical stages of breast cancer at diagnosis versus white patients on a citywide level in Memphis. Black breast cancer patients have higher odds of recurrence and mortality when compared with white breast cancer patients, after adjusting for appropriate demographic and clinical attributes. More work is needed to develop, evaluate, and disseminate interventions to decrease inequities in timeliness of care for breast cancer patients.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , População Branca , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/etnologia , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/etnologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/etnologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/mortalidade , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Lobular/etnologia , Carcinoma Lobular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Lobular/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etnologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tennessee , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Women diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have a 3-fold to 10-fold increased risk of developing invasive breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the life expectancy (LE) and differences in survival offered by active surveillance, risk-reducing chemoprevention, and bilateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with LCIS. METHODS: A Markov simulation model was constructed to determine average LE and quality-adjusted LE (QALE) gains for hypothetical cohorts of women diagnosed with LCIS at various ages under alternative risk-reduction strategies. Probabilities for invasive breast cancer, breast cancer-specific mortality, other-cause mortality and the effectiveness of preventive strategies were derived from published studies and from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. RESULTS: Assuming a breast cancer incidence from 1.02% to 1.37% per year under active surveillance, a woman aged 50 years diagnosed with LCIS would have a total LE of 32.78 years and would gain 0.13 years (1.6 months) in LE by adding chemoprevention and 0.25 years (3.0 months) in LE by adding bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. After quality adjustment, chemoprevention resulted in the greatest QALE for women ages 40 to 60 years at LCIS diagnosis, whereas surveillance remained the preferred strategy for optimizing QALE among women diagnosed at age 65 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: In this model, among women with a diagnosis of LCIS, breast cancer prevention strategies only modestly affected overall survival, whereas chemoprevention was modeled as the preferred management strategy for optimizing invasive disease-free survival while prolonging QALE form women younger than 65 years. Cancer 2017;123:2609-17. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/terapia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Lobular/prevenção & controle , Quimioprevenção , Mastectomia Profilática , Conduta Expectante , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma Lobular/mortalidade , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Árvores de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Expectativa de Vida , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Terminology in pathology is sometimes over-complicated and may be misinterpreted by clinicians facing patients and having difficulty answering questions posed by them. This may especially be true for some breast lesions with an increased risk of malignant transformation, the complex terminology of which reflects attempts to stratify them according to potential risk. On the basis of morphological and molecular features, both ductal and lobular proliferations have been classified and named in different ways by pathologists, and this often makes it difficult for the treating physicians and the patients to fully understand the nature of the lesions and their associated risks. In order to clarify pathology reports, unambiguous and simple terms are needed.