Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device Manufacturer Payments to Cardiologists and Use of Devices.

This study examines whether payments from a left ventricular assist device manufacturer to cardiologists performing percutaneous coronary intervention were associated with any use of the devices.

Mind the Gap! Working Toward Gender Equity in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: Present and Future.

Evidence from medicine and other fields has shown that gender diversity results in better decision making and outcomes. The incoming workforce of congenital heart specialists (especially in pediatric cardiology) appears to be more gender balanced, but past studies have shown many inequities. Gender-associated differences in leadership positions, opportunities presented for academic advancement, and recognition for academic contributions to the field persist. In addition, compensation packages remain disparate if evaluated based on gender with equivalent experience and expertise. This review explores these inequities and has suggested individual and institutional changes that could be made to recruit and retain women, monitor the climate of the institution, and identify and eliminate bias in areas like salary and promotions.

Comparison of emergency medicine specialist, cardiologist, and chat-GPT in electrocardiography assessment.

INTRODUCTION: ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, represents the cutting-edge in its field with its latest model, GPT-4. Extensive research is currently being conducted in various domains, including cardiovascular diseases, using ChatGPT. Nevertheless, there is a lack of studies addressing the proficiency of GPT-4 in diagnosing conditions based on Electrocardiography (ECG) data. The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4 when provided with ECG data, and to compare its performance with that of emergency medicine specialists and cardiologists. METHODS: This study has received approval from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hitit University Medical Faculty on August 21, 2023 (decision no: 2023-91). Drawing on cases from the "150 ECG Cases" book, a total of 40 ECG cases were crafted into multiple-choice questions (comprising 20 everyday and 20 more challenging ECG questions). The participant pool included 12 emergency medicine specialists and 12 cardiology specialists. GPT-4 was administered the questions in a total of 12 separate sessions. The responses from the cardiology physicians, emergency medicine physicians, and GPT-4 were evaluated separately for each of the three groups. RESULTS: In the everyday ECG questions, GPT-4 demonstrated superior performance compared to both the emergency medicine specialists and the cardiology specialists (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). In the more challenging ECG questions, while Chat-GPT outperformed the emergency medicine specialists (p < 0.001), no significant statistical difference was found between Chat-GPT and the cardiology specialists (p = 0.190). Upon examining the accuracy of the total ECG questions, Chat-GPT was found to be more successful compared to both the Emergency Medicine Specialists and the cardiologists (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that GPT-4 is more successful than emergency medicine specialists in evaluating both everyday and more challenging ECG questions. It performed better compared to cardiologists on everyday questions, but its performance aligned closely with that of the cardiologists as the difficulty of the questions increased.

Nutrition Assessment and Education of Patients with Heart Failure by Cardiologists.

Although nutritional assessment and education are important for hospitalized patients with heart failure, the extent of their implementation in real-world clinical practice is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the evaluation and management of nutrition during hospitalization for heart failure using a questionnaire survey for cardiologists.In this cross-sectional multicenter survey, 147 cardiologists from 32 institutions completed a web-based questionnaire (response rate, 95%).The survey showed that 78.2% of the respondents performed a nutritional assessment for hospitalized patients, whereas 38.3% used objective tools. In contrast, only 9.5% of the respondents evaluated the presence or absence of cardiac cachexia. Most respondents (89.8%) reported providing nutritional education to their patients before hospital discharge. However, compared with the number of respondents who provided information on sodium (97.0%) and water (63.6%) restrictions, a limited number of respondents provided guidance on optimal protein (20.5%) and micronutrient (9.1%) intake as part of the nutritional education. Less than 50% of the respondents provided guidance on optimal calorie intake (43.2%) and ideal body weight (34.8%) as a part of the nutritional education for patients identified as malnourished.Although nutritional assessment is widely performed for hospitalized patients with heart failure, most assessments are subjective rather than objective. Nutritional education, frequently provided before hospital discharge, is limited to information on water or salt intake restrictions. Therefore, more comprehensive and individualized nutritional assessments and counselling with a scientific basis are required.

Assessment of dosimetric approaches in evaluating radiation exposure for interventional cardiologists in Sri Lanka.

Interventional cardiologists face significant radiation exposure during interventional cardiology procedures. Therefore, this study focuses on assessing radiation exposure among interventional cardiologists during their procedures. Specifically, it aims to determine the effectiveness of both single and double dosimeter methods in estimating annual occupational radiation doses. This research holds pioneering significance as it represents the very first study undertaken in Sri Lanka. Thirteen interventional cardiologists performed 486 interventional cardiology procedures over three months in three different healthcare institutes. Active Hp(10) dosimeters were placed to measure radiation exposure. Effective doses were calculated using single and double dosimetric algorithms. Annual occupational doses were assessed on an operator basis. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess algorithmic differences and dose variations using the Kruskal-Wallis test and linear regression. The highest annual occupational dose for each dosimetric algorithm received as 2.00 ± 0.24 mSv, 2.29 ± 0.48 mSv, 3.35 ± 0.71 mSv, and 2.64 ± 0.42 mSv, respectively, and remained below the recommended safety limit of 20 mSv/year. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no significant differences in the effective doses among double dosimetric algorithms, as well as between single and double dosimetric algorithms (p > 0.05). Linear regression showed strong correlations among various algorithms, demonstrating consistency. The findings of this study hold significant effects on interventional cardiology practice in Sri Lanka, enhancing radiation safety and monitoring.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Perioperative Health Care Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

There has been little progress in reducing health care disparities since the 2003 landmark Institute of Medicine's report Unequal Treatment. Despite the higher burden of cardiovascular disease in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, they have less access to cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons, and have higher rates of morbidity and mortality with cardiac surgical interventions. This review summarizes existing literature and highlights disparities in cardiovascular perioperative health care. We propose actionable solutions utilizing multidisciplinary perspectives from cardiology, cardiac surgery, cardiothoracic anesthesiology, critical care, medical ethics, and health disparity experts. Applying a health equity lens to multipronged interventions is necessary to eliminate the disparities in perioperative health care among patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Cardiovascular Fellowship Training in Cardio-Obstetrics: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

The United States has the highest maternal mortality in the developed world with cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths. In response to this, the emerging subspecialty of cardio-obstetrics has been growing over the past decade. Cardiologists with training and expertise in caring for patients with cardiovascular disease in pregnancy are essential to provide effective, comprehensive, multidisciplinary, and high-quality care for this vulnerable population. This document provides a blueprint on incorporation of cardio-obstetrics training into cardiovascular disease fellowship programs to improve knowledge, skill, and expertise among cardiologists caring for these patients, with the goal of improving maternal and fetal outcomes.

Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Patterns in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension among Cardiologists and Pulmonologists: Evidence from Turkey.

Background and Objectives: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare chronic disease of the small pulmonary arteries that causes right heart failure and death. Accurate management of PAH is necessary to decrease morbidity and mortality. Understanding current practices and perspectives on PAH is important. For this purpose, we intended to determine physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns in adult pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in Turkey. Materials and Methods: Between January and February 2022, an online questionnaire was sent via e-mail to all cardiologists and pulmonologists who were members of the Turkish Society of Cardiology (TSC) and the Turkish Thoracic Society (TTS). Results: A total of 200 physicians (122 pulmonologists and 78 cardiologists) responded to the questionnaire. Cardiologists were more frequently involved in the primary diagnosis and treatment of PAH than pulmonologists (37.2% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.042). More than half of the physicians had access to right heart catheterization. In mild/moderate PAH patients with a negative vasoreactivity test, the monotherapy option was most preferred (82.8%) and endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) were the most preferred group in these patients (73%). ERAs plus phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5 INH) were the most preferred (69%) combination therapy, and prostacyclin analogues plus PDE-5 INH was preferred by only pulmonologists. Conclusions: Overall, clinical management of patients with PAH complied with guideline recommendations. Effective clinical management of PAH in specialized centers that having right heart catheterization achieve better outcomes.

Assessment of real-time electrocardiogram effects on interpretation quality by emergency physicians.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most commonly performed examinations in emergency medicine. The literature suggests that one-third of ECG interpretations contain errors and can lead to clinical adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of real-time ECG interpretation by senior emergency physicians compared to cardiologists and an ECG expert. METHODS: This was a prospective study in two university emergency departments and one emergency medical service. All ECGs were performed and interpreted over five weeks by a senior emergency physician (EP) and then by a cardiologist using the same questionnaire. In case of mismatch between EP and the cardiologist our expert had the final word. The ratio of agreement between both interpretations and the kappa (k) coefficient characterizing the identification of major abnormalities defined the reading ability of the emergency physicians. RESULTS: A total of 905 ECGs were analyzed, of which 705 (78%) resulted in a similar interpretation between emergency physicians and cardiologists/expert. However, the interpretations of emergency physicians and cardiologists for the identification of major abnormalities coincided in only 66% (k: 0.59 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-0.65); P-value = 1.64e-92). ECGs were correctly classified by emergency physicians according to their emergency level in 82% of cases (k: 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70-0.77); P-value ≈ 0). Emergency physicians correctly recognized normal ECGs (sensitivity = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Our study suggested gaps in the identification of major abnormalities among emergency physicians. The initial and ongoing training of emergency physicians in ECG reading deserves to be improved.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Variations in Use, Charges, and Geography in the United States.

The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States has been increasing but with variability. We used a 100% sample of Medicare beneficiaries (MBs), from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database, who underwent TAVR by cardiologists between 2015 and 2019. We stratified data by geographic region, rural/urban areas, and provider's gender. We examined the average number of TAVRs performed per 100,000 MBs, the average number of TAVRs performed per individual cardiologist, and the average submitted charge (ASC) per procedure. The number of TAVR per 100,000 MBs was significantly variable among regions in all years (all P≤0.028), except in 2015 (P=0.103), with the highest rates being in the Northeast and the lowest being in the West. The number of TAVRs per cardiologist was significantly different among regions only in 2019 (P=0.04), with the Northeast showing the highest numbers and the South showing the lowest. The ASC was also significantly variable among regions in all years (all P≤0.01). The highest ASC was in the Midwest for all years, whereas the lowest was in the West in 2015 to 2016 and in the South in 2017 to 2019. In all years, the number of TAVRs per cardiologist was higher in urban areas than in rural areas (all P<0.05); however, rural cardiologists had higher ASCs (all P<0.05). The number of TAVR procedures per cardiologist was not significantly different between male and female cardiologists (all P>0.1). Female cardiologists had a significantly higher ASC only in 2015 (P=0.034). In conclusion, there are variations in TAVR use and charges for MBs according to geographic, urban, and rural regions and the performing cardiologist's gender.

What do we mean by complex percutaneous coronary intervention? An assessment of agreement amongst interventional cardiologists for defining complexity.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved toward the treatment of complex disease in patients with multiple comorbidities. Whilst there are several definitions of complexity, it is unclear whether there is agreement between cardiologists in classifying complexity of cases. Inconsistent identification of complex PCI can lead to significant variation in clinical decision-making. AIM: This study aimed to determine the inter-rater agreement in rating the complexity and risk of PCI procedures. METHOD: An online survey was designed and disseminated amongst interventional cardiologists by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Intervention (EAPCI) board. The survey presented four patient vignettes, with study participants assessing these cases to classify their complexity. RESULTS: From 215 respondents, there was poor inter-rater agreement in classifying the complexity level (k = 0.1) and a fair agreement (k = 0.31) in classifying the risk level. The experience level of participants did not show any significant impact on the inter-rater agreement of rating the complexity level and the risk level. There was good level of agreement between participants in terms of rating 26 factors for classifying complex PCI. The top five factors were (1) impaired left ventricular function, (2) concomitant severe aortic stenosis, (3) last remaining vessel PCI, (4) requirement fort calcium modification and (5) significant renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Agreement among cardiologists in classifying complexity of PCI is poor, which may lead to suboptimal clinical decision-making, procedural planning as well as long-term management. Consensus is needed to define complex PCI, and this requires clear criteria incorporating both lesion and patient characteristics.

The changing landscape of interventional cardiology: A survival guide in the era of health system consolidation: The Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions affirms the value of this manuscript.

Practice environments for interventional cardiologists have evolved dramatically and now include small independent practices, large cardiology groups, multispecialty groups, and large integrated health systems. Increasingly, cardiologists are employed by hospitals or health systems. Data from MedAxiom and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) demonstrate an exponential increase in the percentage of cardiologists in employed positions from 10% in 2009 to 87% in 2020. This white paper explores these profound changes, considers their impact on interventional cardiologists, and offers guidance on how interventional cardiologists can best navigate this challenging environment. Finally, the paper offers a potential model to improve the employed physician experience through greater physician involvement in decision making, which may increase jobs satisfaction.

Blinded, randomized trial of sonographer versus AI cardiac function assessment.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been developed for echocardiography1-3, although it has not yet been tested with blinding and randomization. Here we designed a blinded, randomized non-inferiority clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05140642; no outside funding) of AI versus sonographer initial assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to evaluate the impact of AI in the interpretation workflow. The primary end point was the change in the LVEF between initial AI or sonographer assessment and final cardiologist assessment, evaluated by the proportion of studies with substantial change (more than 5% change). From 3,769 echocardiographic studies screened, 274 studies were excluded owing to poor image quality. The proportion of studies substantially changed was 16.8% in the AI group and 27.2% in the sonographer group (difference of -10.4%, 95% confidence interval: -13.2% to -7.7%, P < 0.001 for non-inferiority, P < 0.001 for superiority). The mean absolute difference between final cardiologist assessment and independent previous cardiologist assessment was 6.29% in the AI group and 7.23% in the sonographer group (difference of -0.96%, 95% confidence interval: -1.34% to -0.54%, P < 0.001 for superiority). The AI-guided workflow saved time for both sonographers and cardiologists, and cardiologists were not able to distinguish between the initial assessments by AI versus the sonographer (blinding index of 0.088). For patients undergoing echocardiographic quantification of cardiac function, initial assessment of LVEF by AI was non-inferior to assessment by sonographers.

Deciding Whether to Take Sacubitril/Valsartan: How Cardiologists and Patients Discuss Out-of-Pocket Costs.

Background Out-of-pocket costs have significant implications for patients with heart failure and should ideally be incorporated into shared decision-making for clinical care. High out-of-pocket cost is one potential reason for the slow uptake of newer guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This study aims to characterize patient-cardiologist discussions involving out-of-pocket costs associated with sacubitril/valsartan during the early postapproval period. Methods and Results We conducted content analysis on 222 deidentified transcripts of audio-recorded outpatient encounters taking place between 2015 and 2018 in which cardiologists (n=16) and their patients discussed whether to initiate, continue, or discontinue sacubitril/valsartan. In the 222 included encounters, 100 (45%) contained discussions about cost. Cost was discussed in a variety of contexts: when sacubitril/valsartan was initiated, not initiated, continued, and discontinued. Of the 97 cost conversations analyzed, the majority involved isolated discussions about insurance coverage (64/97 encounters; 66%) and few addressed specific out-of-pocket costs or affordability (28/97 encounters; 29%). Discussion of free samples of sacubitril/valsartan was common (52/97 encounters; 54%), often with no discussion of a longer-term plan for addressing cost. Conclusions Although cost conversations were somewhat common in patient-cardiologist encounters in which sacubitril/valsartan was discussed, these conversations were generally superficial, rarely addressing affordability or cost-value judgments. Cardiologists frequently provided patients with a course of free sacubitril/valsartan samples without a plan to address the cost after the samples ran out.

Cost-Effectiveness of Management for Hospitalized Patients.

The cost and/or cost-effectiveness for inpatient management according to the gender of attending physicians remain to be elucidated.Hospitalization costs were extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) -based payment system. Using a dataset of 7,457 hospitalized patients with cardiovascular diseases in our hospital from 2012 to 2018, we compared the actual cost of inpatient management by female cardiologists with that by male cardiologists. Next, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of inpatient management according to the gender of the attending cardiologist. The cost of initial hospitalization per patient was similar between the patients treated by a female or male middle-grade cardiologist ($17,527 ± 14,158, versus $17,358 ± 15,183, P = 0.69). As an analysis on cost-effectiveness, the incremental cost of hospitalization managed by male middle-grade cardiologists was $67 per patient as compared with female middle-grade cardiologists. Concordantly, evaluation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year gained showed that the inpatient management by female cardiologists was dominant over that by male cardiologists.Inpatient management by female cardiologists was more cost-effective as compared with that by male cardiologists. Physician gender might have a considerable effect on medical economics.

Cardiac assessment accuracy by students using palm-held ultrasound compared to physical examination by skilled cardiologists: a pilot study with a single medical student.

BACKGROUND: Despite the inherent limitations of the traditional cardiac physical examination (PE), it has not yet been replaced by a more accurate method. METHODS: We hypothesized that a single medical student, following a brief training (two academic hours) with the PHU, will better identify abnormal findings including significant valvular diseases, pericardial effusion and reduced LV function, as compared to PE performed by senior cardiologists and cardiology fellows. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) served as a 'gold standard'. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients underwent TTE, of them 64 had an abnormal finding. PE identified 34 patients with an abnormal finding compared to 52 identified by PHU (p < 0.05). Ejection fraction (EF) below 50% was found in 35 patients on TTE, compared to only 15 and 6 patients by PE and PHU, respectively (p < 0.05). There was no difference in valvular dysfunction diagnosis detected by PE and medical students using PHU. The overall accuracy of PHU compared to TTE was 87%, with a specificity of 94% and sensitivity of 64% (the low sensitivity was driven mainly by EF assessment), whereas the accuracy of PE was 91%, specificity 91% and sensitivity 38% (again driven by poor EF assessment). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac evaluation using PHU by a single medical student was able to demonstrate similar accuracy as PE done by cardiac specialists or cardiology fellows. The study topic should be validated in future studies with more medical students with a very brief training of cardiac ultrasound.