Video-based assessment of drug-induced effects on contractile motion properties using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced inotropic change is a risk factor in drug development; thus, de-risking is desired in the early stages of drug development. Unlike proarrhythmic risk assessment using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs), few in vitro models were validated to predict cardiac contractility. Motion field imaging (MFI), a high-resolution block matching-based optical flow technique, was expected to possess high quantitative predictivity in the detection of contraction speed. We aimed to establish an in vitro model to assess drug-induced contractile changes using hiPSC-CMs and MFI. METHODS: MFI was designed to noninvasively characterize cardiomyocyte contractile behavior by analyzing light microscope video images, and maximum contraction speed (MCS) was used as the index of contractility. Using MFI, 9 inactive compounds, 10 negative inotropes, and 10 positive inotropes were tested. Two negative chronotropes, ZD7288 and ivabradine, were also tested. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the assay, the minimum effective concentration of the MCS was compared with the human effective total therapeutic concentration for 28 compounds in clinical use. RESULTS: For 8 negative and 8 positive inotropes, the effects observed in in vivo and clinical studies were detected in MFI assay. MFI assay showed negative chronotropic changes without inotropic changes. MFI assay presented sufficient specificity (83%) and sensitivity (88%), and RNA-sequence analysis provided an insight into the relationship between occurrence of the false compounds and target gene expression. DISCUSSION: We demonstrated the utility of MFI assay using hiPSC-CMs to assess drug-induced contractile function. These results will facilitate the de-risking of compounds during early drug development.

Levosimendan in patients with reduced left ventricular function undergoing isolated coronary or valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: In the Levosimendan in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass (LEVO-CTS) trial, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed between levosimendan and placebo in a broad population of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In previous studies, the benefits of levosimendan were most clearly evident in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. In a prespecified analysis of LEVO-CTS, we compared treatment-related outcomes and costs across types of cardiac surgical procedures. METHODS: Overall, 563 (66.4%) patients underwent isolated CABG, 97 (11.4%) isolated valve, and 188 (22.2%) combined CABG/valve surgery. Outcomes included the co-primary 4-component composite (30-day mortality, 30-day renal replacement, 5-day myocardial infarction, or 5-day mechanical circulatory support), the 2-component composite (30-day mortality or 5-day mechanical circulatory support), 90-day mortality, low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), and 30-day medical costs. RESULTS: The 4- and 2-component outcomes were not significantly different with levosimendan and placebo in patients undergoing CABG (15.2% vs 19.3% and 7.8% vs 10.4%), valve (49.0% vs 33.3% and 22.4% vs 2.1%), or combined procedures (39.6% vs 35.9% and 24.0% vs 19.6%). Ninety-day mortality was lower with levosimendan in isolated CABG (2.1% vs 7.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.64), but not significantly different in valve (8.3% vs 2.0%; HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 0.46-36.72) or combined procedures (10.4% vs 7.6%; HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.53-3.64; interaction P = .011). LCOS (12.0% vs 22.1%; odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76; interaction P = .118) was significantly lower in levosimendan-treated patients undergoing isolated CABG. Excluding study drug costs, median and mean 30-day costs were $53,707 and $65,852 for levosimendan and $54,636 and $67,122 for placebo, with a 30-day mean difference (levosimendan - placebo) of -$1270 (bootstrap 95% CI, -$8722 to $6165). CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan was associated with lower 90-day mortality and LCOS in patients undergoing isolated CABG, but not in those undergoing isolated valve or combined CABG/valve procedures.

An Empirically Derived Pediatric Cardiac Inotrope Score Associated With Pediatric Heart Surgery.

We aimed to empirically derive an inotrope score to predict real-time outcomes using the doses of inotropes after pediatric cardiac surgery. The outcomes evaluated included in-hospital mortality, prolonged hospital length of stay, and composite poor outcome (mortality or prolonged hospital length of stay). The study population included patients <18 years of age undergoing heart operations (with or without cardiopulmonary bypass) of varying complexity. To create this novel pediatric cardiac inotrope score (PCIS), we collected the data on the highest doses of 4 commonly used inotropes (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and milrinone) in the first 24 hours after heart operation. We employed a hierarchical framework by representing discrete probability models with continuous latent variables that depended on the dosage of drugs for a particular patient. We used Bayesian conditional probit regression to model the effects of the inotropes on the mean of the latent variables. We then used Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations for simulating posterior samples to create a score function for each of the study outcomes. The training dataset utilized 1030 patients to make the scientific model. An online calculator for the tool can be accessed at https://soipredictiontool.shinyapps.io/InotropeScoreApp. The newly proposed empiric PCIS demonstrated a high degree of discrimination for predicting study outcomes in children undergoing heart operations. The newly proposed empiric PCIS provides a novel measure to predict real-time outcomes using the doses of inotropes among children undergoing heart operations of varying complexity.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Crataegus Extract WS 1442: An Evidence-Based Review.

Preparations from Crataegus (hawthorn) have a long history in the treatment of heart failure. WS 1442 is a dry extract from hawthorn leaves with flowers (4-6.6:1), extraction solvent of ethanol 45% (w/w), adjusted to 17.3-20.1% of oligomeric procyanidins. Nonclinical studies show that WS 1442 has positive inotropic and antiarrhythmic properties and protects the myocardium from ischemic damage, reperfusion injury, and hypertension-related hypertrophy, improves endothelial functions such as NO synthesis, and delays endothelial senescence. Randomized, controlled trials in patients with heart failure have demonstrated that the herbal medicinal product increases functional capacity, alleviates disabling symptoms, and improves health-related quality of life, all of which have become important targets of heart failure therapy according to current disease management guidelines. Clinical trials (including a 2-year mortality study with polypharmacy and > 1300 patients exposed) and post-marketing surveillance studies have shown that WS 1442 has a very favorable safety profile both as monotherapy and as add-on therapy, where no drug interactions have been observed. No specific adverse reactions to WS 1442 are known to date. WS 1442 may thus help to close the therapeutic gap between systolic and diastolic heart failure for which evidence of efficacy for other cardioactive drugs is sparse. Scientific evidence shows that WS 1442 is safe and has a beneficial effect in patients with heart failure corresponding to New York Heart Association classes II or III. The benefit-risk assessment for WS 1442 is therefore positive.

Acute decompensated heart failure as a reason of premature chemotherapy discontinuation may be independent of a lifetime doxorubicin dose in lymphoma patients with cardiovascular disorders.

BACKGROUND: Algorithm of anthracycline-based chemotherapy with favourable cardio-oncological outcome should be clearly re-defined for lymphoma patients with significant pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. A clinical benefit of liposomal forms of anthracycline is still debatable. METHODS: Polish registry included observations of 138 lymphoma patients with concomitant cardiovascular disorders who received liposomal doxorubicin as cardioprotective alternative of conventional form. It was created to analyse the importance of a strategy of administration of conventional/liposomal doxorubicin and a lifetime doxorubicin dose for development of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) as a reason of premature chemotherapy discontinuation. RESULTS: ADHF was the cause of premature termination of chemotherapy only in 11 patients (7.97%). The five new episodes of ADHF related to liposomal doxorubicin were recorded in subgroup of 70 patients with pre-existing heart failure (7.14%). There was the similar incidence of ADHF when liposomal doxorubicin was applied after conventional form in dose 200mg/m2 or if earlier signs of iatrogenic myocardial damage was recognised: 5 cases in subgroup of 51 patients with baseline cardiovascular risk factors (9.8%). ADHF was observed in one of 17 patients (5.88%) receiving liposomal doxorubicin as second line chemotherapy after first line with conventional doxorubicin. Consequently throughout the study group ADHF didn't depend on the total cumulative dose of all types of doxorubicin: OR=0.85; 95%CI: 0.66-1.10; p=0.22 for each 50mg/m2. CONCLUSION: The schedule of administration of conventional/liposomal doxorubicin can decide that lifetime combined doses of anthracyclines become insignificant for ADHF occurrence and premature discontinuation of chemotherapy in lymphoma patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disturbances.

Perioperative Inotrope Therapy and Atrial Fibrillation Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Evidence of a Racial Disparity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, mortality rates are significantly higher among black patients who experience postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Perioperative inotropic therapy (PINOT) was associated with POAF in previous reports, but the extent to which race influences this association is unknown. In the present study, the relationship between PINOT, race, and POAF was examined in patients undergoing CABG surgery. METHODS AND SETTING: Clinical records were examined from a prospectively maintained cohort of 11,855 patients (median age 64 yrs; 70% male; 16% black) undergoing primary isolated CABG at a large cardiovascular institute in the southeastern region of the United States. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using log-binomial regression. MAIN RESULTS: The association between PINOT and POAF was significantly increased among black patients (adjusted RR 1.7, CI 1.4-2.0) compared with white patients (adjusted RR 1.3, CI 1.2-1.4) (pinteraction  = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PINOT may be disproportionately associated with POAF among black patients undergoing CABG surgery. Additional studies are needed to examine further the potential underlying mechanisms of this association.

Promising approach for the preclinical assessment of cardiac risks using left ventricular pressure-volume loop analyses in anesthetized monkeys.

INTRODUCTION: Load-independent cardiac parameters obtained from the ventricular pressure-volume relationship are recognized as gold standard indexes for evaluating cardiac inotropy. In this study, for better analyses of cardiac risks, load-independent pressure-volume loop parameters were assessed in addition to load-dependent inotropic, hemodynamic and electrocardiographic changes in isoflurane-anesthetized monkeys. METHODS: The animals were given milrinone (a PDE 3 inhibitor), metoprolol (a ß-blocker), or dl-sotalol (a ß+IKr blocker) intravenously over 10min at two dose levels including clinically relevant doses (n=5/drug). RESULTS: Milrinone and metoprolol produced positive and negative inotropy, respectively. These effects were detected as changes in the slope of the preload-recruitable stroke work, which is a load-independent inotropic parameter. However, dl-sotalol did not alter the slope of the preload-recruitable stroke work. That means dl-sotalol produced no inotropy, although it decreased load-dependent inotropic parameters, including maximal upstroke velocity of left ventricular pressure, attributable to decreased heart rate and blood pressure. Other typical pharmacological effects of the compounds tested were also detected. Both ß-blockers produced PR prolongation, decreased left ventricular end-systolic pressure, increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and increased maximal descending velocity of left ventricular pressure and time constant for isovolumic relaxation. dl-Sotalol also prolonged heart-rate-corrected QT interval. Milrinone induced reflex tachycardia, PR shortening, and decreased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. DISCUSSION: The overall assessment by not only load-dependent inotropic parameters but also load-independent parameters obtained from the ventricular pressure-volume loop analysis using monkeys can provide further appropriate information for the assessment of drug-induced cardiac risks.

Cost-benefits of incorporating levosimendan into cardiac surgery practice: German base case.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-benefit of using levosimendan compared with dobutamine, in the perioperative treatment of patients undergoing cardiac surgery who require inotropic support. METHODS: A two-part Markov model was designed to simulate health-state transitions of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and estimate the short- and long-term health benefits of treatment. Hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality, medication, and adverse events were key clinical- and cost-inputs. Cost-benefits were evaluated in terms of costs and bed stays within the German healthcare system. Drug prices were calculated from the German Drug Directory (€/2014) and published literature, with a 3% annual discount rate applied. The base case analysis was for a 1-year time horizon. RESULTS: The use of levosimendan vs dobutamine was associated with cost savings of €4787 per patient from the German hospital perspective due to reduced adverse events and shorter hospital LOS, leading to increased bed capacity and hospital revenue. LIMITATIONS: A pharmacoeconomic calculation for the specific situation of the German healthcare system that is based on international clinical trial carries a substantial risk of disregarding potentially relevant but unknown confounding factors (i.e., ICU-staffing, co-medications, standard-ICU care vs fast-tracking, etc.) that may either attenuate or increase the outcome pharmacoeconomic effects of a drug; however, since these conditions would also apply for patients treated with comparators, their net effects may not necessarily influence the conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of levosimendan in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who require inotropic support appears to be cost-saving. The results of the analysis provide a strong rationale to run local clinical studies with pharmacoeconomic end-points which would allow a much more precise computation of the benefits of levosimendan.

Assessment of sustained effects of levosimendan and dobutamine on left ventricular systolic functions by using novel tissue Doppler derived indices in patients with advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing levosimendan vs. dobutamine have revealed that levosimendan is better in relieving symptoms. Echocardiographic studies have been done using second measurements immediately following a dobutamine infusion or while it was still being administered. The aim of our study was assessment of sustained effects of 24 h levosimendan and dobutamine infusions on left ventricular systolic functions. METHODS: A total of 61 patients with acutely decompensated heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV symptoms were randomized to receive either levosimendan or dobutamine 2:1 in an open label fashion. Before and 5 days after the initiation of infusions, functional class was assessed, N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), mitral inflow peak E and A wave velocity, and E/A ratios were measured; using tissue Doppler imaging, isovolumic myocardial acceleration (IVA), peak myocardial velocity during isovolumic contraction (IVV), peak systolic velocity during ejection period (Sa), early (E') and late (A') diastolic velocities, and E'/A' and E/E' ratios were measured. RESULTS: The NYHA class improved in both groups, but improvements were prominent in the levosimendan group. NT-proBNP levels were significantly reduced in the levosimendan group. Improvements in LVEF and diastolic indices were significant in the levosimendan group. Tissue Doppler-derived systolic indices of IVV and IVA increased significantly in the levosimendan group. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions continue after a levosimendan infusion.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction assessment between pradigastat and digoxin or warfarin.

Pradigastat, a novel diacylglycerol acyltransferase-1 inhibitor, was evaluated for both pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) drug-drug interactions when co-administered with digoxin or warfarin in healthy subjects. This open-label study included two parallel subject cohorts each with three sequential treatment periods. Forty subjects were enrolled in the study with 20 subjects allocated to each cohort. PK and PD (PT/INR for warfarin only) samples were collected in each period. The statistical analysis results showed that the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of digoxin, R-warfarin, and S-warfarin PK parameters (AUC and Cmax) were all within 0.80-1.25 interval. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of pradigastat PK parameters (AUC and Cmax) were within 0.80-1.25 interval when co-administered with warfarin; while co-administration with digoxin slightly reduced pradigastat exposure (∼15%). The results also showed that 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of warfarin PD parameters (AUC(PT), PTmax, AUC(INR), and INRmax) were within 0.80-1.25 interval. Pradigastat and digoxin or warfarin had no relevant clinical PK or PD drug-drug interactions. Administration of pradigastat and warfarin or pradigastat and digoxin as a mono or combined treatment appears to be safe and tolerated.

Effectiveness and safety of digoxin among contemporary adults with incident systolic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend digoxin for patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure (HF) receiving optimal medical therapy, but this recommendation is based on limited, older trial data. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of digoxin in a contemporary cohort of patients with incident systolic HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified adults with incident systolic HF between 2006 and 2008 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California who had no prior digoxin use. We used multivariable extended Cox regression to examine the association between new digoxin use and risks of death and HF hospitalization, controlling for medical history, laboratory results, medications, HF disease severity, and the propensity for digoxin use. We also conducted analyses stratified by sex and concurrent ß-blocker use. Among 2891 newly diagnosed patients with systolic HF, 529 (18%) received digoxin. During a median 2.5 years of follow-up, incident digoxin use was associated with higher rates of death (14.2 versus 11.3 per 100 person-years) and HF hospitalization (28.2 versus 24.4 per 100 person-years). In multivariable analysis, incident digoxin use was associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.36) but no significant difference in the risk of HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.34). Results were similar in analyses stratified by sex and ß-blocker use. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin use in patients with incident systolic HF was independently associated with a higher risk of death but no difference in HF hospitalization.

Concurrent use of antiplatelets, anticoagulants, or digoxin with Chinese medications: a population-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: We examined the extent of concurrent use of antiplatelets, anticoagulants, or digoxin with Chinese medications (CMs) and identified its associated factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using one million random samples from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 in Taiwan. High-risk Western medications (HRWMs) focused on in this study were antiplatelets (aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, ticlopidine), anticoagulants (heparin, warfarin), and digoxin. Concurrent use was described as having an overlapping use period of HRWM with CMs any time in 2005. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and health service utilizations between patients with and without concurrent HRWM-CM use were compared. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with incident concurrent use. RESULTS: Of the 70,698 eligible HRWM users, 13.2 % used CMs concurrently for an average duration of 26.7 ± 43 days. The incidence of concurrent HRWM-CM use, which excluded prior CM use within 6 months preceding the first CM use, was 6.3 %. Warfarin or ticlopidine users were more likely to be prescribed with CMs than were the other HRWM users. Factors associated with an increasing incidence of concurrent HRWM-CM use included female sex, age 45-54 years, middle monthly income, higher number of outpatient visits or distinct prescribed medications, and a previous diagnosis of heart diseases, stroke, or hypertension. In contrast, age ≥ 65 years and higher medical expenditure were associated with a lower incidence of concurrent use. CONCLUSIONS: In the Taiwanese population, approximately one in eight HRWM users were concomitantly prescribed CMs. Whether such concurrent use is associated with adverse clinical outcomes warrants further investigations.

Ivabradine for chronic heart failure?

In the UK, over 900,000 patients have chronic heart failure and more than 60,000 develop the condition each year.(1,2) Patients with heart failure suffer significantly reduced quality of life and have a poor prognosis. It is estimated that heart failure accounts for around 2% of the total NHS budget, 70% of which is related to the costs of hospitalisation.(3) The main pharmacological interventions that are currently used to manage heart failure include angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonists (AIIRAs), beta-blockers and aldosterone antagonsists. Ivabradine (Procoralan - Servier) is a "pure heart rate lowering agent, acting by selective and specific inhibition of the cardiac pacemaker I(f) current that controls the spontaneous diastolic depolarisation in the sinus node and regulates heart rate".(4) It has been licensed in the UK since 2006 for the symptomatic treatment of chronic stable angina in patients with normal sinus rhythm.(5) Earlier this year ivabradine was granted marketing authorisation for the treatment of chronic heart failure. Here we review the role of ivabradine for this new indication.

Assessment of the appropriateness of serum digoxin concentration measurement in a medical group setting.

BACKGROUND: Recent quality initiatives require that the routine annual therapeutic drug-monitoring (TDM) parameters for the high-risk medication digoxin include a measure of renal function and a serum potassium level but not a serum digoxin concentration (SDC) measurement. Several studies have shown that the majority of the SDCs obtained in hospital settings provide little clinically actionable information. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the appropriateness and utility of SDCs ordered in a medical group practice setting by categorizing the reason the SDC was ordered and identifying action taken in response to the result. METHODS: The descriptive study was conducted as a retrospective, electronic medical record (EMR) review of 90 primary care patients with continuous prescriptions for digoxin current on their medication profile with no gaps in therapy for at least 2 years prior to an SDC result entered into the EMR between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2009. The reason the SDC was ordered was abstracted independently by 2 reviewers, who then assigned it to 1 of 8 predefined indication categories based on previously published criteria and practice guidelines. A third reviewer resolved inter-reviewer discrepancy (n = 1). RESULTS: A total of 90 patients with at least 1 SDC met inclusion criteria. Routine monitoring was the most frequent SDC order indication category with 35 patients (38.9%), 17 (48.6%) of whom did not have the recommended monitoring measures of potassium or renal function drawn concurrently. Patients were included in other categories as follows: confirmation of signs/symptoms of toxicity 30 (33.3%); assessment of factors altering pharmacokinetics 5 (5.6%); assessment of dosage change 5 (5.6%); assessment of drug interaction 3 (3.3%); assessment of clinical response 3 (3.3%); assessment of adherence 1 (1.1%); and other 2 (2.2%). Across all categories, a total of 19 (21.1%) of SDC results were outside the therapeutic range of 0.5 nanograms (ng) per mL and 2.0 ng per mL, 18 of which were below 0.5 ng per mL, with none of the subtherapeutic levels leading to a change in digoxin therapy. Only 1 patient (1.1%) had therapy changed in response to an elevated abnormal SDC result of 2.1 ng per mL and was in the routine monitoring category. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of SDC results obtained in our medical group setting did not lead to clinical action, such as dose adjustment or drug discontinuation. SDCs were commonly measured as part of routine monitoring, which is considered an inappropriate indication, and often without being accompanied by better markers for digoxin toxicity such as serum potassium levels and measures of renal function as recommended by drug-monitoring quality initiatives. Provider education is needed regarding the most indicative digoxin TDM parameters to obtain in order to satisfy quality initiatives.

Comparison of rate control versus rhythm control for management of atrial fibrillation in patients with coexisting heart failure: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare lifetime costs and health outcomes of rate control versus rhythm control for management of atrial fibrillation in patients with coexisting heart failure from the third-party payer perspective. DESIGN: A Markov decision analysis model constructed from costs, utility, and transition probability inputs obtained from randomized clinical trials and publically available databases. PATIENTS: A simulated cohort aged 65 years or older with persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and heart failure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Markov states for rhythm control were cardioversion plus amiodarone and maintenance amiodarone, and those for rate control were ß-blocker, digoxin, and calcium channel blocker. Transition states included treatment success, hospitalizations for atrial fibrillation and/or heart failure, and severe adverse effects. Economic inputs included cost for drugs, cost of hospitalizations for atrial fibrillation and/or heart failure, and cost of management of severe adverse effects. Costs were measured in 2009 U.S. dollars, and clinical outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). One-way and multivariable sensitivity analyses were conducted. Uncertainty intervals (UIs) were obtained from probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Rate control was found to be less costly and more effective than rhythm control. Base case and probabilistic sensitivity analyses cost and effectiveness values for rate control were $7231 (95% UI $5517-9016) and 2.395 QALYs (95% UI 2.366-2.424 QALYs); whereas those for rhythm control were $16,291 (95% UI $11,033-21,434) and 2.197 QALYs (95% UI 2.155-2.237 QALYs). No critical values were found for any model parameters in the one-way sensitivity analyses. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that rate control was considered cost-effective in 100% of cases at willingness-to-pay ratios between $0 and $200,000/QALY. CONCLUSION: Rate control is less costly and more effective than rhythm control and should be the initial treatment for atrial fibrillation among patients with coexisting heart failure.

[Medication errors: analysis of a digoxin overdose case in a neonatology unit]. / Erreur médicamenteuse : analyse d'un surdosage en digoxine dans un service de néonatalogie.

Neonatology and pediatrics are units where medication errors occur. Indeed, the complexity of nursing care, the lack of information and marketing authorization for drugs contribute to the occurrence of often underestimated iatrogenic events. Through a case of digoxin overdose in a neonatology unit, each stage of the drug circuit was analyzed. From prescription to administration to dispensation, the accumulation of individual errors put a newborn in danger. The analysis and declaration of such events can improve safety and the quality of patient care.

Digoxin therapy: A persisting interest despite contrary winds.

Digoxin therapy is used to treat heart failure patients for more than 200 years. However, absence of effect on overall mortality found in the DIG study associated with frequent adverse effects due to overdosing in elderly patients with impaired renal function finally persuaded medical opinion to the weak interest of digoxin in chronic heart failure. Its image of old-fashioned drug in the mind of young cardiology generations appears widely distorted, and suffers from the absence of promotion by pharmaceutical industry, given a very low cost and a rapid arrival onto the generic market. Yet, regarding strict data from the literature, it remains a lot of positive factors in favor of the interest for digoxin: reduction of morbidity, reduction of mortality at low serum concentration <1.0 ng/ml, very low cost with favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. This article challenges some arguments for defending digoxin as another first-line therapy as well as ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers in the treatment of chronic heart failure.

Quality of life 15 years after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in quality of life (QoL) during 15 years after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and prediction of impaired QoL after 15 years. METHODS: All patients in western Sweden who underwent primary CABG without simultaneous valve surgery between 1988 and 1991 were included. QoL during a period of 15 years after CABG was evaluated with three instruments: the Nottingham Health Profile, the Psychological General Well-Being Index, and the Physical Activity Score. RESULTS: A total of 2000 patients took part in the survey, (none excluded) of whom 808 were still alive after 15 years and 79% answered the inquiry. Despite an ongoing decline in QoL over the years, an improvement in QoL was maintained in most sub-dimensions at the 15-year follow-up compared with that prior to surgery. Seven factors emerged as predictors of impaired QoL 15 years after CABG. They are as follows: (i) high age, (ii) female sex, (iii) history of diabetes, (iv) obesity, (v) prolonged stay in the intensive care unit, (vi) prolonged treatment on a ventilator, (vii) need for inotropic drugs at the time of surgery; of which the latter three might be secondary to left ventricular dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Despite an ongoing decline in QoL over the years, there was still an improvement in most aspects of QoL 15 years after CABG compared with that before surgery. Intensified early treatment of diabetes, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction in CABG patients might allow an even better long-term QoL.