Assessment of the Impact of Carvedilol Administered Together with Dexrazoxan and Doxorubicin on Liver Structure and Function, Iron Metabolism, and Myocardial Redox System in Rats.

Late cardiotoxicity is a formidable challenge in anthracycline-based anticancer treatments. Previous research hypothesized that co-administration of carvedilol (CVD) and dexrazoxane (DEX) might provide superior protection against doxorubicin (DOX)-induced cardiotoxicity compared to DEX alone. However, the anticipated benefits were not substantiated by the findings. This study focuses on investigating the impact of CVD on myocardial redox system parameters in rats treated with DOX + DEX, examining its influence on overall toxicity and iron metabolism. Additionally, considering the previously observed DOX-induced ascites, a seldom-discussed condition, the study explores the potential involvement of the liver in ascites development. Compounds were administered weekly for ten weeks, with a specific emphasis on comparing parameter changes between DOX + DEX + CVD and DOX + DEX groups. Evaluation included alterations in body weight, feed and water consumption, and analysis of NADPH2, NADP+, NADPH2/NADP+, lipid peroxidation, oxidized DNA, and mRNA for superoxide dismutase 2 and catalase expressions in cardiac muscle. The iron management panel included markers for iron, transferrin, and ferritin. Liver abnormalities were assessed through histological examinations, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and serum albumin level measurements. During weeks 11 and 21, reduced NADPH2 levels were observed in almost all examined groups. Co-administration of DEX and CVD negatively affected transferrin levels in DOX-treated rats but did not influence body weight changes. Ascites predominantly resulted from cardiac muscle dysfunction rather than liver-related effects. The study's findings, exploring the impact of DEX and CVD on DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, indicate a lack of scientific justification for advocating the combined use of these drugs at histological, biochemical, and molecular levels.

Incidence of, Risk Factors for, and Outcomes After Ascites in a Population-Based Cohort of Older Americans.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes after the development of ascites are poorly described for contemporary patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We examined data for a 20% random sample of US Medicare enrollees with cirrhosis and Part D prescription coverage from 2008 to 2019, excluding patients with heart failure and diuretic use prior to cirrhosis. Among 63,364 persons with cirrhosis, we evaluated the incidence of ascites using an Aalen-Johansen estimator. We evaluated risk factors for ascites, mortality, and mortality after ascites using multistate modeling. We determined the associations with each outcome for an array of medication exposures including nonselective beta-blockers, antiviral therapy, statins, rifaximin, anticoagulants, and metformin. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of ascites was 5.1%, 9.5%, and 10.7% and 1, 3, and 5 years overall. The corresponding data for ascites requiring paracentesis were 1%, 2.1%, and 2.4%. Persons aged < 65 years, with alcohol-related cirrhosis, varices, or HE, are most likely to develop ascites. The risk of ascites was higher for persons taking any NSBB (including carvedilol) but lower for those taking atorvastatin (but not other statins) and antiviral therapy for Hepatitis C. Incident ascites was associated with increased risk of death, HR 27.6 95%CI(21.7-35.1). Survival following ascites was 1.08 years (interquartile range, IQR, 0.26-2.75), 0.38 years (IQR0.1-1.3) for those requiring paracentesis. Lipophilic statins were the only medications associated with lower mortality after ascites requiring paracentesis. CONCLUSIONS: Ascites is associated with a high risk of death. Very few candidate therapies are associated with the reduction in the risk of ascites and mortality after ascites development.

Pharmacological assessment of zebrafish-based cardiotoxicity models.

Cardiotoxicity remains the most common reason for failure during drug development. Recently, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) model has emerged for the evaluation of drug-dependent cardiotoxicity and for the identification of cardioprotective molecules. However, it remains unknown how closely the zebrafish-based results may be translated to humans. To tackle this issue, we established embryonic zebrafish models of doxorubicin-, adrenaline- and terfenadine-induced cardiotoxicity with unified dosing regimen which eventually enabled head-to-head comparison of the drugs. Subsequently, we determined whether human cardioprotective medications - dexrazoxane, metoprolol, carvedilol and valsartan - are able to manage heart dysfunction in zebrafish. Our results indicated that doxorubicin, adrenaline and terfenadine elicited overt signs of cardiotoxicity in fish, and we further showed that the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system and, to a lesser extent, ß-adrenergic system, ameliorated the heart disease in zebrafish. From the drug development standpoint, our work opens the possibility to determine the cardiovascular properties of tested compounds using the rapid and affordable zebrafish model.

Risk of clinically relevant hyperglycemia with metoprolol compared to carvedilol in older adults with heart failure and diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Although prior literature suggests that metoprolol may worsen glucose control compared to carvedilol, whether this has clinical relevance among older adults with diabetes and heart failure (HF) remains an open question. METHODS: This was a US retrospective cohort study utilizing data sourced from a 50% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims of patients with part D prescription drug coverage (2007-2017). Among patients with diabetes and HF, we identified initiators of metoprolol or carvedilol, which were 1:1 propensity score matched on >90 variables. The primary outcome was initiation of a new oral or injectable antidiabetic medication (proxy for uncontrolled diabetes); secondary outcomes included initiation of insulin and severe hyperglycemic event (composite of emergency room visits or hospitalizations related to hyperglycemia). RESULTS: Among 24 239 propensity score-matched pairs (mean [SD] age 77.7 [8.0] years; male [39.1%]), there were 8150 (incidence rate per 100 person-years [IR] = 33.5) episodes of antidiabetic medication initiation among metoprolol users (exposure arm) compared to 8576 (IR = 33.4) among carvedilol users (comparator arm) compared to corresponding to an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94, 1.01). Similarly, metoprolol was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of secondary outcomes including insulin initiation: aHR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.04) and severe hyperglycemic events: aHR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this large study of older adults with HF and diabetes, initiation of metoprolol compared to carvedilol was not associated with an increase in the risk of clinically relevant hyperglycemia.

Novel peripheral role of Nurr-1/GDNF/AKT trajectory in carvedilol and/or morin hydrate hepatoprotective effect in a model of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion.

Although the central role of Nurr-1/GDNF has been reviewed amply, scarce data are available on their peripheral impact. Carvedilol and morin hydrate have previously conferred their hepatic anti-fibrotic action. AIM: Thus, our aim was to unveil the potential hepatoprotective role of carvedilol (CR) and/or morin hydrate (MH) using a hepatic 70% partial warm ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) rat model. MAIN METHOD: Rats were allocated into sham-operated, hepatic I/R, and I/R preceded by oral administration of CR (10 and 30 mg/kg; CR10/CR30), MH (30 mg/kg), or CR10 + MH for one week. KEY FINDINGS: On the molecular level, pretreatment with CR and/or MH increased the hepatic contents of Nurr-1, GDNF, and the protein expression of active/p-AKT. On the other hand, they inactivated GSK3ß and NF-κB to increase the antioxidant enzymes (GPx, SOD, CAT). All regimens also enhanced the autophagy/lysosomal function and boosted the protein expression of beclin-1, LC3II, and TFEB. Moreover, their antiapoptotic effect was signified by increasing the anti-apoptotic molecule Bcl2 and inhibiting Bax, Bax/Bcl2 ratio, and caspase-3, effects that were confirmed by the TUNEL assay. These improvements were reflected on liver function, as they decreased serum aminotransferases and liver structural alterations induced by I/R. Despite its mild impact, CR10 showed marked improvements when combined with MH; this synergistic interaction overrides the effect of either regimen alone. SIGNIFICANCE: In conclusion, CR, MH, and especially the combination regimen, conferred hepatoprotection against I/R via activating the Nurr-1/GDNF/AKT trajectory to induce autophagy/lysosomal biogenesis, inhibit GSK3ß/NF-кB hub and apoptosis, and amend redox balance.

Ex Ante Economic Evaluation of Arg389 Genetically Targeted Treatment with Bucindolol versus Empirical Treatment with Carvedilol in NYHA III/IV Heart Failure.

OBJECTIVE: The Beta-Blocker Evaluation Survival Trial showed no survival benefit for bucindolol in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, but subanalyses suggested survival benefits for non-Black subjects and Arg389 homozygotes. We conducted an ex ante economic evaluation of Arg389 targeted treatment with bucindolol versus carvidolol, complementing a previous ex ante economic evaluation of bucindolol preceded by genetic testing for the Arg389 polymorphism, in which genetic testing prevailed economically over no testing. METHODS: A decision tree analysis with an 18-month time horizon was performed to estimate the cost effectiveness/cost utility of trajectories of 100%, 50%, and 0% of patients genetically tested for Arg389 and comparing bucindolol with empirical carvedilol treatment as per prior BEST subanalyses. Incremental cost-effectiveness/cost-utility ratios (ICERs/ICURs) were estimated. RESULTS: Race-based analyses for non-White subjects at 100% testing showed a loss of (0.04) life-years and (0.03) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $2185, yielding a negative ICER of ($54,625)/life-year and ICUR of ($72,833)/QALY lost; at 50%, the analyses showed a loss of (0.27) life-years and (0.16) QALYs at an incremental cost of $1843, yielding a negative ICER of ($6826)/life-year and ICUR of ($11,519)/QALY lost; at 0%, the analyses showed a loss of (0.33) life-years and (0.30) QALYs at an incremental cost of $1459, yielding a negative ICER of ($4421)/life-year and ICUR of ($4863)/QALY lost. Arg389 homozygote analyses at 100% testing showed incremental gains of 0.02 life-years and 0.02 QALYs at an incremental cost of $378, yielding an ICER of 18,900/life-year and ICUR of $18,900/QALY gained; at 50%, the analyses showed a loss of (0.24) life-years and (0.09) QALYs at an incremental cost of $1039, yielding a negative ICER of ($4329)/life-year and ICUR of ($9336)/QALY lost; at 0%, the analyses showed a loss of (0.33) life-years and (0.30) QALYs at an incremental cost of $1459, yielding a negative ICER of ($4421)/life-year and ICUR of ($4863)/QALY lost. CONCLUSION: This independent ex ante economic evaluation suggests that genetically targeted treatment with bucindolol is unlikely to yield clinicoeconomic benefits over empirical treatment with carvedilol in NYHA III/IV HF.

Assessment of myocardial function in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cats with and without response to medical treatment by carvedilol.

BACKGROUND: Inconsistency of treatment response in cats with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is well recognized. We hypothesized that the difference in response to beta-blockers may be caused by myocardial functional abnormalities. This study was designed to compare myocardial function in cats with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with and without response to beta-blockers. Twenty-one, client-owned, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cats treated with carvedilol were analyzed. After carvedilol treatment, cats with decreased left ventricular outflow tract velocity were categorized as responders (n = 10); those exhibiting no response (no decrease in the left ventricular outflow tract velocity) were categorized as non-responders (n = 11). The cats were examined using layer-specific assessment of the myocardial function (whole, endocardial, and epicardial layers) longitudinally and circumferentially by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography, before and after carvedilol treatment. RESULTS: The non-responder cats had a significantly higher age, end-diastolic left ventricular posterior-wall thickness, peak velocity of left ventricular outflow tract, and dose of carvedilol than the responders (p = 0.04, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.01, respectively). The circumferential strain in the epicardial layer was lower and circumferential endocardial to epicardial strain ratio was higher in non-responders than responders (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006). According to the multivariate analysis, circumferential strain in the epicardial layer was the only independent correlate of treatment response with carvedilol. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial function, assessed by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography, differed in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with and without response to beta-blockers. The determination of layer-specific myocardial function may facilitate detailed pathophysiologic assessment and treatment response in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Low Utilization of Beta-Blockers Among Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: The evidence-based beta-blockers carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol succinate reduce mortality and hospitalizations among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Use of these medications is not well described in the general population of patients with HFrEF, especially among patients with potential contraindications. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to describe the patterns of prescription fills for carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol succinate among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HFrEF, as well as to estimate the associations between specific contraindications for beta-blocker therapy and those patterns. METHODS AND RESULTS: With the use of the cohort of 15,205 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HFrEF from 2007 to 2013 in the 5% Medicare random sample, we described prescription fills (30 days after discharge) and dosage patterns (1 year after discharge) for beta-blockers. By means of of Fine and Gray competing risk models, we estimated the associations between potential contraindications (hypotension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], asthma, and syncope) and prescription fill and dosing patterns while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and health care utilization. For beneficiaries who did not die or readmitted to the hospital, 38% of hospitalizations were followed by a prescription fill for an evidence-based beta-blocker within 30 days, 12% were followed by prescription fills for at least 50% of the recommended dose of an evidence-based beta-blocker within 1 year, and 9% were followed by a prescription fill for an up-titrated dose of an evidence-based beta-blocker within 1 year. The prevalence of the contraindications were 21% for hypotension, 48% for COPD, 15% for asthma, and 12% for syncope. Among beneficiaries who did not fill a prescription for an evidence-based beta-blocker within 30 days, 67% had at least 1 of these contraindications. Hypotension, COPD, and syncope were each associated with a ∼10% lower risk of filling a prescription for an evidence-based beta-blocker. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription fill and up-titration rates for evidence-based beta-blockers are low among Medicare beneficiaries with HFrEF, but contraindications explain only a minor part of these low rates.

Outcomes of "diabetes-friendly" vs "diabetes-unfriendly" ß-blockers in older nursing home residents with diabetes after acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: To assess whether nursing home (NH) residents with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) preferentially received "T2D-friendly" (vs "T2D-unfriendly") ß-blockers after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to evaluate the comparative effects of the two groups of ß-blockers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This new-user retrospective cohort study of NH residents with AMI from May 2007 to March 2010 used national data from the Minimum Data Set and Medicare system. T2D-friendly ß-blockers were those hypothesized to increase peripheral glucose uptake through vasodilation: carvedilol, nebivolol and labetalol. Primary outcomes were hospitalizations for hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia in the 90 days after AMI. Secondary outcomes were functional decline, death, all-cause re-hospitalization and fracture hospitalization. We compared outcomes using binomial and multinomial logistic regression models after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Of 2855 NH residents with T2D, 29% initiated a T2D-friendly ß-blocker vs 24% of 6098 without T2D (P < 0.001). For primary outcomes among residents with T2D, T2D-friendly vs T2D-unfriendly ß-blockers were associated with a reduction in hospitalized hyperglycaemia (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.97), but unassociated with hypoglycaemia (OR 2.05, 95% CI 0.82-5.10). For secondary outcomes, T2D-friendly ß-blockers were associated with a greater rate of re-hospitalization (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.57), but not death (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.85-1.32), functional decline (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.70-1.19), or fracture (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.40-7.08). CONCLUSIONS: In older NH residents with T2D, T2D-friendly ß-blocker use was associated with a lower rate of hospitalization for hyperglycaemia, but a higher rate of all-cause re-hospitalization.

Assessment of clinical effect and treatment quality of immediate-release carvedilol-IR versus SLOW release carvedilol-SR in Heart Failure patients (SLOW-HF): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Carvedilol is a non-selective, third-generation beta-blocker and is one of the cornerstones for treatment for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, due to its short half-life, immediate-release carvedilol (IR) needs to be prescribed twice a day. Recently, slow-release carvedilol (SR) has been developed. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether carvedilol-SR is non-inferior to standard carvedilol-IR in terms of its clinical efficacy in patients with HFrEF. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with stable HFrEF will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the carvedilol-SR group (160 patients) and the carvedilol-IR group (160 patients). Patients aged ≥ 20 years, with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%, N-terminal pro B-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) ≥ 125 pg/ml or BNP ≥ 35 pg/ml, who are clinically stable and have no evidence of congestion or volume retention, will be eligible. After randomization, patients will be followed up for 6 months. The primary endpoint is the change in NT-proBNP level from baseline to the study end. The secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients with NT-proBNP increment > 10% from baseline, composite of all-cause mortality and readmission, mortality rate, readmission rate, changes in blood pressure, quality of life, and drug compliance. DISCUSSIONS: The SLOW-HF trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase-IV, multicenter study to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of carvedilol-SR compared to carvedilol-IR in HFrEF patients. If carvedilol-SR proves to be non-inferior to carvedilol-IR, a once-daily prescription of carvedilol may be recommended for patients with HFrEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03209180 . Registered on 6 July 2017.

Assessment of Haemodynamic Response to Nonselective Beta-Blockers in Portal Hypertension by Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

A significant unmet need exists for accurate, reproducible, noninvasive diagnostic tools to assess and monitor portal hypertension (PHT). We report the first use of quantitative MRI markers for the haemodynamic assessment of nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) in PHT. In a randomized parallel feasibility study in 22 adult patients with PHT and a clinical indication for NSBB, we acquired haemodynamic data at baseline and after 4 weeks of NSBB (propranolol or carvedilol) using phase-contrast MR angiography (PC-MRA) in selected intra-abdominal vessels. T1 mapping of liver and spleen was undertaken to assess changes in tissue composition. Target NSBB dose was achieved in 82%. There was a substantial reduction from baseline in mean average flow in the superior abdominal aorta after 4 weeks of NSBB therapy (4.49 ± 0.98 versus 3.82 ± 0.86 L/min, P = 0.03) but there were no statistically significant differences in flow in any other vessels, even in patients with >25% decrease in heart rate (47% of patients). Mean percentage change in liver and spleen T1 following NSBB was small and highly variable. In conclusion, PC-MRA was able to detect reduction in cardiac output by NSBB but did not detect significant changes in visceral blood flow or T1. This trial was registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN98001632).

[The benefits of carvedilol therapy in the treatment of patients with high cardiovascular risk]. / A carvedilolterápia elonyei magas cardiovascularis kockázatú betegek kezelése során.

Among the variety of cardiologic pharmacological therapy options, beta-blockers stand on a prominent position. There are several reasons for this. On one hand they have numerous indication rounds, even though professional guidelines have recently tended to de-emphasize them for treatments of hypertension without complication or comorbidity. However, in addition to hypertonic cases associated with cardiac complication, they play a fundamental role in treating heart failure and arrhythmia and the different clinical manifestations (stable angina pectoris, myocardial state) of ischemic heart disease. The decade long development of the pharmacological group made its hemodynamic effects ever more refined. On the other hand we must not neglect the fact that more and more features came to light that positively influence the outcome of cardiovascular diseases. Verification of these latter features in numerous multicentric studies showed how to achieve a beneficial effect on survivability, independent on even hemodynamic effects during beta-blocker therapy.

Assessment of the potential drug-drug interaction between carvedilol and clopidogrel mediated through intestinal P-glycoprotein.

The most widely prescribed oral antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, shows high interindividual variability resulting in an increased risk of cardiovascular events in the patients with reduced platelet inhibition. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pump in limiting the intestinal permeability of clopidogrel and the effect of a ß-blocker, namely, carvedilol, on its intestinal transport. Effective permeabilities (Peff) of clopidogrel and carvedilol were investigated in the proximal jejunum and distal ileum of rats using an in situ intestinal perfusion model. Peff values of clopidogrel and carvedilol were found to be concentration dependent with decreased Peff values at the low perfusate concentrations. Coperfusion with the P-gp inhibitors verapamil (100 µM) and carvedilol (10 µM) significantly increased the Peff of clopidogrel in the jejunum (8.31±0.20 x 10-5 and 6.98±0.75 x 10-5 vs. 3.60±0.51 x 10-5, respectively) and ileum (9.08±2.19 x 10-5 and 8.35±1.58 x 10-5 vs. 3.85±0.15 x 10-5, respectively). However, at the highest concentration tested (30 µM), clopidogrel exhibited 3 and 1.4 times higher Peff than those of metoprolol, an FDA high permeability reference standard, in the jejunum and ileum, respectively. Overall, this study indicates that the efflux function appears not to have a significant impact on the in vivo intestinal absorption of clopidogrel due to the saturation of P-gp, suggesting no clinically relevant interaction between carvedilol and clopidogrel mediated through P-gp at intestinal level.

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction assessment between LCZ696, an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine, or carvedilol.

LCZ696 is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor in development for treatments of hypertension and heart failure indications. In 3 separate studies, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) potential was assessed when LCZ696 was coadministered with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), amlodipine, or carvedilol. The studies used a open-label, single-sequence, 3-period, crossover design in healthy subjects. Blood samples were collected to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of LCZ696 analytes (AHU377, LBQ657, and valsartan), HCTZ, amlodipine, or carvedilol (R[+]- and S[-]-carvedilol) for statistical analysis. When coadministered LCZ696 with HCTZ, the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of AUCtau,ss of HCTZ and that of LBQ657 were within a 0.80-1.25 interval, whereas HCTZ Cmax,ss decreased by 26%, LBQ657 Cmax,ss increased by 19%, and the AUCtau,ss and Cmax,ss of valsartan increased by 14% and 16%, respectively. Pharmacokinetics of amlodipine, R(+)- and S(-)-carvedilol, or LBQ657 were not altered after coadministration of LCZ696 with amlodipine or carvedilol. Coadministration of LCZ696 400 mg once daily (qd) with HCTZ 25 mg qd, amlodipine 10 mg qd, or carvedilol 25 mg twice a day (bid) had no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. LCZ696, HCTZ, amlodipine, and carvedilol were safe and well tolerated when given alone or concomitantly in the investigated studies.

Assessment of sex differences in Pharmacokinetics of carvedilol in human.

Carvedilol is an anti-hypertensive agent capable of blocking both alph (α) and beta (ß) receptors used to preclude cardiac arrhythmias and angina. The study was designed to evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of carvedilol in human male and female volunteers. Healthy male and female (twenty each) volunteers were finalized for the study after preliminarily clinical examination. Blood samples were collected at specific time intervals after giving an oral dose of 12.5mg carvedilol, separated the plasma and placed at -80°C until analysis. Estimation of carvedilol in human plasma was accomplished by High performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method using fluorescent detector. Plasma concentration-time curve was used for calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters using two-compartment open model. Mean (SD) values of AUC and Cmax 0.076±0.021ßg.h/ml and 0.024±0.005ßg/mL, respectively) in male differ significantly (P<0.05) from the female 0.197±0.042ßg.h/ml and 0.048±0.02ßg/mL, respectively). Overall, bioavailability of carvedilol was somewhat higher in females than in males, but these differences could be expounded by the lower body weight of female. Conversely, no significant differences were found for tmax, clearance and half-life in male and female. Moreover the ethnicity had significant impact on the Pharmacokinetics of carvedilol in human.

Clinical status and outcome of Japanese heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction treated with carvedilol.

The effect of beta-blockers in treating Japanese heart failure (HF) patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is unclear. This prospective observational study enrolled 1,682 Japanese HF patients who received carvedilol for the first time. Patients were followed for a mean of 1.6 years. The 1,492 patients with baseline LVEF measurements were allocated to the following groups: reduced EF (LVEF < 40%; n = 724), borderline EF (LVEF 4050%; n = 355), and preserved EF (LVEF ≥ 50%; n = 413). Baseline characteristics, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, change in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, and long-term outcome were compared among the groups. Patients with preserved EF were more likely to be older, female, and have ischemic etiology and hypertension than patients with reduced EF. Carvedilol maintenance dosage was lower in patients with preserved EF (7.9 mg/day versus 6.6 mg/ day). NYHA class and BNP level were lower in patients with preserved EF at baseline but improved to the same level in all groups at 6 months. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the hazard ratio for death or hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease in patients with preserved EF versus those with reduced EF was 1.031 (P = 0.847). This study elucidated the characteristics of HF patients given carvedilol in "real world" clinical settings. A comparative controlled study is necessary to elucidate whether the improvements in NYHA and BNP as well as the outcome profile observed in patients with preserved EF were caused by the favorable effects of carvedilol.

Self-rated health predicts adverse events during ß-blocker treatment: the CIBIS-ELD randomised trial analysis.

BACKGROUND: Self-rated health (SRH) predicts outcome in patients with heart failure. Beta-blockers are known to improve health-related quality of life and reduce mortality in such patients. We aimed to evaluate the relation between SRH and adverse events during titration of beta-blockers in elderly patients with heart failure. METHODS: The cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study in the elderly (CIBIS-ELD) is a multicentre, double-blind trial, in which 883 patients aged ≥ 65 years with chronic heart failure (73 ± 6 years, 38% women, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 42% ± 14%) were randomised to bisoprolol or carvedilol. SRH was assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks, using a 5-grade descriptive scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor. RESULTS: Median SRH at baseline and follow-up was good, but more patients reported fair/poor SRH at baseline (36% vs. 30%, p = 0.012). Women, beta-blocker-naïve patients, patients in NYHA class III/IV and those with PHQ-9 score ≥ 12 were more likely to report fair/poor baseline SRH (p < 0.001 for all). During follow-up, SRH improved in 34% of patients and worsened in 8% (p < 0.001). Adverse events were experienced by 64% patients and 38% experienced > 1 adverse event or serious adverse event, with higher prevalence in lower SRH categories. In a multivariate logistic regression model, SRH, age, distance achieved on the 6-min walk test and LVEF >45% predicted adverse events (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: SRH is an independent predictor of adverse events during titration of beta-blockers and correlates with the proportion and number of adverse events per patient.

An assessment of the association between carvedilol exposure and severe hypersensitivity reactions, angioedema, and anaphylactic reactions: a retrospective nested case-control analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information in the literature regarding the risk of severe hypersensitivity reactions due to different ß-blocking agents. Most of the available information addresses the potential for increased severity of anaphylaxis or poor response to treatments among patients receiving ß-blocking agents. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence rates of severe hypersensitivity reactions (angioedema and anaphylactic reactions) for various ß-blockers and to examine the risk of severe hypersensitivity reactions in patients exposed to carvedilol extended-release compared with carvedilol and compared with other ß-blockers. METHODS: A case-control analysis nested within a cohort of ß-blocker users in the LabRx Database was conducted. A case was defined as an incident hypersensitivity reaction of either anaphylactic shock (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision [ICD-9] code 995.0) or angioneurotic edema (ICD-9 code 995.1). Three controls were matched to each case. Patients were classified according to their ß-blocker exposure in the 30 day-period before the index date. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 1,810,487 ß-blocker users were identified; 7811 hypersensitivity cases and 23,433 controls were included in this analysis. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 53 (14) years, and 49% were men. The overall incidence rates of severe hypersensitivity reactions among various ß-blockers categories were similar to that in the overall ß-blocker users cohort (2.40 per 1000 person-years [95% CI, 2.35-2.45]). The odds ratios of severe hypersensitivity reaction for carvedilol extended-release compared with carvedilol and with other long-acting ß-blockers were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.48-1.53) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.90-1.35), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective database analysis of mostly middle-aged patients detected no statistically significant differences in the likelihood of severe hypersensitivity reactions among patients who received carvedilol extended-release versus carvedilol or other long-acting ß-blockers.