Assessment of Biofilm Forming Capability and Antibiotic Resistance in Proteus mirabilis Colonizing Indwelling Catheter.

<b>Background and Objective:</b> Urinary tract infections from the use of an indwelling urinary catheter are one of the most common infections caused by <i>Proteus mirabilis</i>. Due to their biofilm-producing capacity and the increasing antimicrobial resistance in this microorganism, this study aimed to determine the prevalence, biofilm-producing capacity, antimicrobial resistance patterns, multidrug resistance and plasmid mediated resistance of the recovered isolates. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 50 urinary samples were collected from May to August, 2018 from patients on indwelling urinary catheters. Using routine microbiological and biochemical methods, 37 <i>P. mirabilis</i> were isolated. Biofilm forming capability was determined among the isolates using the tube method while antimicrobial susceptibility and plasmid curing were also performed. <b>Results:</b> All isolates were biofilm producers with 17(46%) being moderate producers while 20(54%) were strong biofilm formers. The study isolates exhibited a high resistance rate to empiric antibiotics, including ceftazidime (75.8%), cefuroxime (54.5%), ampicillin (69.7%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (51.5%). Low resistance was seen in the fluoroquinolones, gentamicin and nitrofurantoin. Plasmid curing experiment revealed that most isolates lost their resistance indicating that resistance was borne on plasmids. Plasmid carriage is likely the reason for the high MDR rate of 56.8% observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings necessitate the provision of infection control programs which will guide and implement policies.

Perspectives on technology: Single-use catheters - evidence and environmental impact.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the data comparing single- vs multi-use catheters for clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC), consider if the widespread use of single-use catheters is warranted given the cost and environmental impact, and put forth ideas for future consideration. METHODS: A primary literature review was performed in PubMed over the past 50 years. Studies that performed comparative analysis of single- and multi-use catheters were included in our review. All studies that reported on primary data were narratively summarised. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were identified that reported on primary data comparing single- and multi-use catheters. There was no appreciable evidence suggesting reusable multi-use catheters were inferior to single-use catheters from an infection or usability standpoint. In addition, the environmental and monetary burden of single-use catheters is significant. CONCLUSIONS: The intermittent catheter landscape in the USA has a complex past: defined by policy, shaped by industry, yet characterised by a paucity of data demonstrating superiority of single-use over multi-use catheters. We believe that the aversion to reusable catheters by many patients and healthcare professionals is unwarranted, especially given the cost and environmental impact. Moving forward, better comparative data and more sustainable practices are needed.

Urologic Consultations for Urethral Catheter Placement: A Cost Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively analyze the cumulative costs associated with Foley consultations throughout their event lifespan. Urologic consultation for Foley catheter (Foley) management is common. Such consultations are heterogeneous, with some requiring only simple catheter placement. Others (eg, traumatic Foley) necessitate more complex procedural intervention and may also result in downstream care and/or intervention needs. METHODS: This study analyzed a retrospective database of consecutive urologic Foley consultations at a single academic institution (2017-2019), collecting comprehensive data on patient characteristics, related procedures/materials, and downstream care (eg, hospitalization, laboratory/radiology testing, evaluation and management services). A process map and related modeling were used to assess categorical and cumulative event costs. Allocated costs and charges were utilized for materials/institutional resources and for services rendered, respectively. Statistical analysis performed using SAS and statistical inferences were based on significance level of 10%. RESULTS: A total of 244 patient encounters were included in the analysis. The mean overall cost of all care related to Foley consultation was $2389.23 (±$4045.89). A total of 62 (25.4%) patients required only consultation/Foley without additional intervention, with a total cost of $738.90 (±$94.10). The remaining 182 (75.6%) patients required additional intervention and related cost (total cost $3413.27 (±$4850.41)). Traumatic catheterization was associated with higher cost compared with atraumatic cases ($3201.50 (±$6158.4) vs $1926.40 (±$1776.20), respectively, P = .05). Downstream care comprised a significant portion of overall cost. In 61 (25%) cases no nurse attempt was performed prior to consultation. CONCLUSION: Urologic Foley consultation is associated with significant health system cost. Quality initiatives to optimizing Foley placement and management are critical to improving quality of care and associated downstream costs.

Cost-effectiveness of a novel urethral catheter safety device in preventing catheterization injuries in the UK.

AIMS: Intraurethral catheter balloon inflation is a substantial contributor to significant catheter-related urethral injury. A novel safety valve has been designed to prevent these balloon-inflation injuries. The purpose of this evaluation was to assess the cost-effectiveness of urethral catheterisation with the safety valve added to a Foley catheter versus the current standard of care (Foley catheter alone). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis was conducted from the UK public payer perspective on a hypothetical cohort of adults requiring transurethral catheterization. A decision tree was used to capture outcomes in the first 30 days following transurethral catheterization, followed by a Markov model to estimate outcomes over a person's remaining lifetime. Clinical outcomes included catheter balloon injuries [CBIs], associated short-term complications, urethral stricture disease, life years and QALYs. Health-economic outcomes included total costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, net monetary benefit (NMB) and net health benefit. RESULTS: Over a person's lifetime, the safety valve was predicted to reduce CBIs by 0.04 per person and CBI-related short-term complications by 0.03 per person, and nearly halve total costs. The safety valve was dominant, resulting in 0.02 QALYs gained and relative cost savings of £93.19 per person. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the safety valve would be cost-saving in 97% of simulations run versus standard of care. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a novel safety valve aiming to prevent CBIs during transurethral catheterization to current standard of care was estimated to bring both clinical benefits and cost savings.

Mechanical and morphological characterisation of porcine urethras for the assessment of paediatric urinary catheter safety.

Paediatric urinary catheters are often necessary in critical care settings or to address congenital anomalies affecting the urogenital system. Iatrogenic injuries can occur during the placement of such catheters, highlighting the need for a safety device that can function in paediatric settings. Despite successful efforts to develop devices that improve the safety of adult urinary catheters, no such devices are available for use with paediatric catheters. This study investigates the potential for utilising a pressure-controlled safety mechanism to limit the trauma experienced by paediatric patients during inadvertent inflation of a urinary catheter anchoring balloon in the urethra. Firstly, we establish a paediatric model of the human urethra using porcine tissue by characterising the mechanical and morphological properties of porcine tissue at increasing postnatal timepoints (8, 12, 16 and 30 weeks). We identified that porcine urethras harvested from pigs at postnatal week 8 and 12 exhibit morphological properties (diameter and thickness) that are statistically distinct from adult porcine urethras (postnatal week 30). We therefore utilise urethra tissue from postnatal week 8 and 12 pigs as a model to evaluate a pressure-controlled approach to paediatric urinary catheter balloon inflation intended to limit tissue trauma during inadvertent inflation in the urethra. Our results show that limiting catheter system pressure to 150 kPa avoided trauma in all tissue samples. Conversely, all of the tissue samples that underwent traditional uncontrolled urinary catheter inflation experienced complete rupture. The findings of this study pave the way for the development of a safety device for use with paediatric catheters, thereby alleviating the burden of catastrophic trauma and life changing injuries in children due to a preventable iatrogenic urogenital event.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of hydrophilic-coated catheters in long-term intermittent catheter users in the UK.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of single-use hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters (HCICs) versus single-use uncoated intermittent catheters (UICs) for urinary catheterization. METHODS: The evaluation took a UK national health service (NHS) perspective. The population of interest were people using intermittent catheters, with either a spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. A Markov model was developed that estimated costs and clinical evidence over the lifetime of a hypothetical cohort and applied health-related quality-of-life estimates. Model inputs were sourced from published evidence, including a network meta-analysis to inform the treatment effect (reduction in catheter-associated urinary tract infections [CAUTIs]), and were supported by expert opinion. The model outputs included per-patient lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). Event counts were also produced. RESULTS: Using HCICs instead of UICs could prevent seven CAUTI events per patient over a lifetime horizon (1.8 requiring secondary care). Overall, lifetime use of HCICs is £3,183 more expensive than use of UICs per patient. However, for these additional costs, 0.55 QALYs are gained. The ICER is £5,755 per additional QALY gained. Key drivers of the model results were identified and subject to sensitivity analyses. The results were found to be robust to parameter uncertainty. CONCLUSION: HCICs are likely to be a cost-effective alternative to UICs, a result driven by substantial reductions in the number of CAUTIs. Their adoption across clinical practice could avoid a substantial number of infections, freeing up resources in the NHS and reducing antibiotic use in urinary catheter users.

A new economic model was developed from a United Kingdom National Health Service perspective, to explore whether hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters would be "worth" introducing for intermittent catheter users with either a spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. More specifically, costs were analyzed alongside clinical evidence and health-related quality-of-life data to investigate whether hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters would offer a notable health benefit when compared with uncoated intermittent catheters for the assessed population, whilst keeping costs to the National Health Service sufficiently low. Model inputs were sourced from published evidence where possible, and experts were consulted otherwise. The results showed that, whilst lifetime use of hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters is £3,183 more expensive than use of uncoated intermittent catheters per patient, the health benefit with hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters offsets these costs, by definition a cost-effective result. This means that hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters are likely to be a cost-effective alternative to uncoated intermittent catheters. Their adoption across clinical practice could avoid a substantial number of infections, thereby freeing up healthcare resources in the National Health Service and reducing antibiotic use in urinary catheter users.

Budget impact analysis of a multifaceted nurse-led intervention to reduce indwelling urinary catheter use in New South Wales Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: In hospitals, catheter acquired urinary tract infection causes significant resource waste and discomfort among admitted patients. An intervention for reducing indwelling catheterisations - No-CAUTI - was trialled across four hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. No-CAUTI includes: train-the-trainer workshops, site champions, compliance audits, and point prevalence surveys. The trial showed reductions on usual care catheterisation rates at 4- and 9-month post-intervention. This result was statistically non-significant; and post-intervention catheterisation rates rebounded between 4 and 9 months. However, No-CAUTI showed statistically significant catheterisation decreases for medical wards, female patients and for short-term catheterisations. This study presents a budget impact analysis of a projected five year No-CAUTI roll out across New South Wales public hospitals, from the cost perspective of the New South Wales Ministry of Health. METHODS: Budget forecasts were made for five year roll outs of: i) No-CAUTI; and ii) usual care, among all public hospitals in New South Wales hosting overnight stays (n=180). The roll out design maintains intervention effectiveness with ongoing workshops, quality audits, and hospital surveys. Forecasts of catheterisations, procedures and treatments were modelled on No-CAUTI trial observations. Costs were sourced from trial records, the Medical Benefits Scheme, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and public wage awards. Cost and parameter uncertainties were considered with sensitivity scenarios. RESULTS: The estimated five-year No-CAUTI roll-out cost was $1.5 million. It had an overall budget saving of $640,000 due to reductions of 100,100 catheterisations, 33,300 urine tests and 6,700 antibiotics administrations. Non-Metropolitan hospitals had a net saving of $1.2 million, while Metropolitan hospitals had a net cost of $0.54 million. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to usual care, NO-CAUTI is expected to realise overall budget savings and decreases in catheterisations over five years. These findings allow a consideration of the affordability of a wide implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12617000090314 ). First registered 17 January 2017, retrospectively. First enrolment, 15/11/2016.

Mapping of health services to urinary catheter users: challenges for the advanced nursing practice.

OBJECTIVE: To map and to identify the material distributed in the health care network to urinary catheter users in a municipality in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. METHOD: Quantitative, descriptive-exploratory study, carried out with supervisors and/or managers of health services and a unit of distribution of materials used by urinary catheter users. Data were collected using a questionnaire and an interview via electronic form and analyzed by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Health services to urinary catheter users were mapped in five health regions: health centers, family health units, outpatient clinics, specialized centers, hospitals, and emergency care units. Intermittent catheter and indwelling catheter were the distributed materials, along with other essential materials. CONCLUSION: The study shows the high number of distributed urinary catheters; primary health care was the service that directed the care from the materials distribution. It is concluded that mapping the provided care allows for understanding the provided care as well as fostering future studies addressing healthcare network strategies for users of urinary catheter.

Can we really make catheter-associated urinary tract infections a never event? A level 1 trauma center's experience with prophylactic antibiotic bladder irrigation.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are considered "never events" and are reportable to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as a quality indicator. Despite protocols to determine appropriate removal of urinary catheters as soon as possible, severely injured trauma patients often require prolonged catheterization during ongoing resuscitation or develop retention requiring catheter replacement, exposing them to risk for CAUTI. We evaluated whether prophylactic antibiotic bladder irrigation reduces the incidence of CAUTI in critically ill trauma patients. METHODS: As a quality initiative, gentamicin bladder catheter irrigation (GBCI) was performed on a level 1 trauma center's patients at risk for CAUTI in 2021, defined by indwelling Foley catheterization for a minimum of 3 days. We then conducted a retrospective study using a comparison cohort of 2020 admissions as the control group. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates per 1,000 catheterized days were compared between these two groups. Patients with traumatic bladder injuries were excluded. RESULTS: Our cohort included 342 patients with a median hospitalization of 11 (7-17) days, Injury Severity Score of 17 (10-26), and 6 (4-11) days of catheterization. Eighty-six patients, catheterized for 939 at-risk days, received twice-daily GBCI compared with 256, catheterized for 2,114 at-risk days, who did not. Zero patients in the GBCI group versus nine patients in the control group developed CAUTI. The incidence of CAUTI in the GBCI group was significantly less than in the control group (0/1,000 vs. 4.3/1,000 catheterized days, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic antibiotic bladder irrigation was associated with a zero incidence of CAUTI among trauma patients at risk for CAUTI. This practice holds promise as effective infection prophylaxis for such patients. The optimal duration and frequency of irrigation remain to be determined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level III.

I-DECIDED®-a decision tool for assessment and management of invasive devices in the hospital setting.

Indwelling medical devices, including vascular access and urinary catheters, pose a risk for infection, and therefore daily assessment and consideration of their continued need is a patient safety priority. The I-DECIDED® device assessment and decision tool is an evidence-based checklist, designed to improve the assessment, care and timely removal of invasive devices in acute hospitalized patients. This paper explains each step of the tool, with rationale for inclusion.

Urinary catheter monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure after major abdominal surgery, a cost-benefit analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate costs and benefits associated with measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). METHODS: We built a cost-benefit analysis from the hospital facility perspective and time horizon limited to hospitalization for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for the intervention of urinary catheter monitoring of IAP. We used real-world data estimating the likelihood of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Costs included catheter costs (estimated $200), costs of additional intensive care unit (ICU) days from IAH and ACS, and costs of CRRT. We took the preventability of IAH/ACS given early detection from a trial of non-surgical interventions in IAH. We evaluated uncertainty through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and the effect of individual model parameters on the primary outcome of cost savings through one-way sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In the base case, urinary catheter monitoring of IAP in the perioperative period of major abdominal surgery had 81% fewer cases of IAH of any grade, 64% fewer cases of AKI, and 96% fewer cases of ACS. Patients had 1.5 fewer ICU days attributable to IAH (intervention 1.6 days vs. control of 3.1 days) and a total average cost reduction of $10,468 (intervention $10,809, controls $21,277). In Monte Carlo simulation, 86% of 1,000 replications were cost-saving, for a mean cost savings of $10,349 (95% UCI $8,978, $11,720) attributable to real-time urinary catheter monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure. One-way factor analysis showed the pre-test probability of IAH had the largest effect on cost savings and the intervention was cost-neutral at a prevention rate as low as 2%. CONCLUSIONS: In a cost-benefit model using real-world data, the potential average in-hospital cost savings for urinary catheter monitoring of IAP for early detection and prevention of IAH, ACS, and AKI far exceed the cost of the catheter.

Preventing Health Care-Associated Infections Through Implementation of an Interprofessional Visual Management Safety Tracker.

BACKGROUND: The management of health care associated infections (HAIs) challenges acute care facilities due to variability in practices. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to decrease central line-associated bloodstream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and Clostridioides difficile infection in a high acuity care environment using a visual management (VM) tool to address practice variations. LOCAL PROBLEM: An acute care unit experienced increasing HAIs. METHODS: An interprofessional team used Lean methodology to implement a VM tool reflective of evidence-based HAI prevention practices that staff had frequently omitted. INTERVENTIONS: A VM tool called the Safety Tracker was created. RESULTS: In 12 months, HAIs decreased from 9 events to 1, with a corresponding reduction in indwelling urinary catheter utilization and central line utilization. More than $160 000 were avoided in health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: Creating an interprofessional VM Safety Tracker could significantly reduce HAIs.

Urinary catheter policies in home healthcare agencies and hospital transfers due to urinary tract infection.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a frequent cause of hospital transfer for home healthcare (HHC) patients, particularly among patients with urinary catheters. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, nationally representative HHC agency-level survey (2018-2019) and combined it with patient-level data from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) and Medicare inpatient data (2016-2018) to evaluate the association between HHC agencies' urinary catheter policies and hospital transfers due to UTI. Our sample included 28,205 patients with urinary catheters who received HHC from 473 Medicare-certified agencies between 2016-2018. Our survey assessed whether agencies had written policies in place for (1) replacement of indwelling catheters at fixed intervals, and (2) emptying the drainage bag. We used adjusted logistic regression to estimate the association of these policies with probability of hospital transfer due to UTI during a 60-day HHC episode. RESULTS: Probability of hospital transfer due to UTI during a HHC episode ranged from 5.62% among agencies with neither urinary catheter policy to 4.43% among agencies with both policies. Relative to agencies with neither policy, having both policies was associated with 21% lower probability of hospital transfer due to UTI (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest implementation of policies in HHC to promote best practices for care of patients with urinary catheters may be an effective strategy to prevent hospital transfers due to UTI.

Administration of indwelling urinary catheters in four Australian Hospitals: cost-effectiveness analysis of a multifaceted nurse-led intervention.

BACKGROUND: Urinary catheters are useful among hospital patients for allowing urinary flows and preparing patients for surgery. However, urinary infections associated with catheters cause significant patient discomfort and burden hospital resources. A nurse led intervention aiming to reduce inpatient catheterisation rates was recently trialled among adult overnight patients in four New South Wales hospitals. It included: 'train-the trainer' workshops, site champions, compliance audits and promotional materials. This study is the 'in-trial' cost-effectiveness analysis, conducted from the perspective of the New South Wales Ministry of Health. METHODS: The primary outcome variable was catheterisation rates. Catheterisation and procedure/treatment data were collected in three point prevalence patient surveys: pre-intervention (n = 1630), 4-months (n = 1677), and 9-months post-intervention (n = 1551). Intervention costs were based on trial records while labour costs were gathered from wage awards. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios were calculated for 4- and 9-months post-intervention and tested with non-parametric bootstrapping. Sensitivity scenarios recalculated results after adjusting costs and parameters. RESULTS: The trial found reductions in catheterisations across the four hospitals between preintervention (12.0 % (10.4 - 13.5 %), n = 195) and the 4- (9.9 % (8.5 - 11.3 %), n = 166 ) and 9- months (10.2 % (8.7 - 11.7 %) n = 158) post-intervention points. The trend was statistically non-significant (p = 0.1). Only one diagnosed CAUTI case was observed across the surveys. However, statistically and clinically significant decreases in catheterisation rates occurred for medical and critical care wards, and among female patients and short-term catheterisations. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios at 4-months and 9-months post-intervention were $188 and $264. Bootstrapping found reductions in catheterisations at positive costs over at least 72 % of iterations. Sensitivity scenarios showed that cost effectiveness was most responsive to changes in catheterisation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis showed that the association between the intervention and changes in catheterisation rates was not statistically significant. However, the intervention resulted in statistically significant reductions for subgroups including among short-term catheterisations and female patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that reductions in catheterisations were most likely achieved at positive cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000090314). First hospital enrolment, 15/11/2016; last hospital enrolment, 8/12/2016.

Prospective assessment of catheter-associated bacteriuria clinical presentation, epidemiology, and colonization dynamics in nursing home residents.

BACKGROUNDCatheterization facilitates continuous bacteriuria, for which the clinical significance remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the clinical presentation, epidemiology, and dynamics of bacteriuria in a cohort of long-term catheterized nursing home residents.METHODSProspective urine culture, urinalysis, chart review, and assessment of signs and symptoms of infection were performed weekly for 19 study participants over 7 months. All bacteria ≥ 1 × 103 cfu/mL were cultured, isolated, identified, and tested for susceptibility to select antimicrobials.RESULTSIn total, 226 of the 234 urine samples were polymicrobial (97%), with an average of 4.7 isolates per weekly specimen. A total of 228 urine samples (97%) exhibited ≥ 1 × 106 CFU/mL, 220 (94%) exhibited abnormal urinalysis, 126 (54%) were associated with at least 1 possible sign or symptom of infection, and 82 (35%) would potentially meet a standardized definition of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), but only 3 had a caregiver diagnosis of CAUTI. Bacterial isolates (286; 30%) were resistant to a tested antimicrobial agent, and bacteriuria composition was remarkably stable despite a combined total of 54 catheter changes and 23 weeks of antimicrobial use.CONCLUSIONBacteriuria composition was largely polymicrobial, including persistent colonization by organisms previously considered to be urine culture contaminants. Neither antimicrobial use nor catheter changes sterilized the urine, at most resulting in transient reductions in bacterial burden followed by new acquisition of resistant isolates. Thus, this patient population exhibits a high prevalence of bacteriuria coupled with potential indicators of infection, necessitating further exploration to identify sensitive markers of true infection.FUNDINGThis work was supported by the NIH (R00 DK105205, R01 DK123158, UL1 TR001412).

Trends in the use and costs of intermittent urinary catheters in the Netherlands from 1997 to 2018: A population-based observational study.

AIM: To obtain insight into the the use and costs of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) in the Netherlands from 1997 to 2018. METHODS: For this population-based study, data on the use and costs of disposable catheters were provided by the Drug Information Project database. This database contains information about the Dutch insured population, which increased from 9.9 to 17.1 million persons between 1997 and 2018 (64%-100% of the Dutch population). The following trends were evaluated: (1) CIC users, (2) distribution of users by gender and age-group, (3) distribution of users by neurogenic and non-neurogenic cause for CIC, (4) total costs, and (5) costs per user. Total users are adjusted for the Dutch population. Costs are corrected for inflation and expressed in euros. RESULTS: Extramural use of CIC increased from 14,258 users in 1997 to 45,909 users in 2018. CIC users per 100,000 persons nearly tripled from 92 users to 267 users. Male CIC users almost quadrupled from 92 to 334 per 100,000 insured persons, whereas female users more than doubled from 91 to 201 per 100,000 insured persons. In 2018, 49% of the users had a non-neurogenic cause for CIC. Total costs increased from 16.4 million euros in 1997 to 74.6 million euros in 2018. Costs per user rose from 1151 to 1624 euros (41.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The use and costs of disposable catheters in the Netherlands increased substantially over the past two decades. Non-neurogenic bladder patients represent 49% of the population on CIC, which has not been described before in the literature.

Gaps in infection prevention practices for catheter-associated urinary tract infections and central line-associated bloodstream infections as identified by the Targeted Assessment for Prevention Strategy.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) represent a substantial portion of health care-associated infections (HAIs) reported in the United States. The Targeted Assessment for Prevention Strategy is a quality improvement framework to reduce health care-associated infections. Data from the Targeted Assessment for Prevention Facility Assessments were used to determine common infection prevention gaps for CAUTI and CLABSI. METHODS: Data from 2,044 CAUTI and 1,680 CLABSI assessments were included in the analysis. Items were defined as potential gaps if ≥33% respondents answered Unknown, ≥33% No, or ≥50% No or Unknown or Never, Rarely, Sometimes, or Unknown to questions pertaining to those areas. Review of response frequencies and stratification by respondent role were performed to highlight opportunities for improvement. RESULTS: Across CAUTI and CLABSI assessments, lack of physician champions (<35% Yes) and nurse champions (<55% Yes), along with lack of awareness of competency assessments, audits, and feedback were reported. Lack of practices to facilitate timely removal of urinary catheters were identified for CAUTI and issues with select device insertion practices, such as maintaining aseptic technique, were perceived as areas for improvement for CLABSI. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest common gaps in critical components of infection prevention and control programs. The identification of these gaps has the potential to inform targeted CAUTI and CLABSI prevention efforts.

Avaliação da depuração de litíase ureteral menor que 7 mm em pacientes com cateter duplo-j / Assessment of ureteral lithiasis clearance less than 7 mm in patients with double-j catheter

INTRODUÇÃO: A cateterização temporária com duplo-J pode prevenir a necessidade de intervenção cirúrgica em uma parcela significativa de pacientes, além de ser uma alternativa de menor custo ao sistema de saúde. OBJETIVO: Analisar o impacto da retirada de cateteres duplo-J em pacientes portadores de litíase ureteral com cálculos menores de 7 mm, virgens de tratamento, sem a necessidade de tratamentos endourológicos ou cirúrgicos adicionais. METOLOGIA: Estudo clínico prospectivo, realizado no período de setembro de 2019 a julho de 2021 com pacientes da Clínica de Urologia do Hospital do Servidor Municipal de Saúde de São Paulo. RESULTADOS: 21 pacientes se apresentaram a nossa clínica com ureterolitíase sintomática. Os participantes foram agrupados em dois grupos: Depuração com 17 pacientes que não fizeram terapêutica de adicional e Retratamento com 4 pacientes. Apenas 3 pacientes dentre os 17 do grupo de depuração conseguiram visualizar eliminação do cálculo durante micção. Os 4 participantes do grupo de retratamento foram sintomáticos para cólica nefrética afebril e foram submetidos a ureteroscopia, após realização de exame de tomografia, em caráter de urgência com remoção do cálculo com basket e/ou litotripsia a laser. O diâmetro médio dos cálculos do grupo de pacientes que depuraram os cálculos foi de 5,3 mm (variação de 3 a 7 mm), com tempo médio de permanência de 12,30 semanas. Em relação ao grupo que necessitou retratamento o diâmetro médio foi de 5,5 mm (variação de 4 a 7 mm), com tempo de permanência de 10,85 semanas. CONCLUSÃO: Devido a elevada depuração e a mínima observação de complicações a utilização do cateterismo ureteral com duplo-J pode ser uma ferramenta adicional para tratamento de ureterolitiase obstrutiva em cálculos menores ou iguais a 7mm. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: cálculos ureterais, obstrução ureteral, cateteres urinários