Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anesth Analg ; 130(4): 1026-1034, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31725022

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Central line insertion is a core skill for anesthesiologists. Although recent technical advances have increased the safety of central line insertion and reduced the risk of central line-associated infection, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring and improved intravenous access techniques have also reduced the need for perioperative central venous access. We hypothesized that the number of central lines inserted by anesthesiologists has decreased over the past decade. To test our hypothesis, we reviewed the Medicare Physician Supplier Procedure Summary (PSPS) database from 2007 to 2016. METHODS: Claims for central venous catheter placement were identified in the Medicare PSPS database for nontunneled and tunneled central lines. Pulmonary artery catheter insertion was included as a nontunneled line claim. We stratified line insertion claims by specialty for Anesthesiology (including Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists and Anesthesiology Assistants), Surgery, Radiology, Pulmonary/Critical Care, Emergency Physicians, Internal Medicine, and practitioners who were not anesthesia providers such as Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) and Physician Assistants (PAs). Utilization rates per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries were then calculated by specialty and year. Time-based trends were analyzed using Joinpoint linear regression, and the Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) was calculated. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2016, total claims for central venous catheter insertions of all types decreased from 440.9 to 325.3 claims/10,000 beneficiaries (AAPC = -3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.6 to -3.2: P < .001). When analyzed by provider specialty and year, the number of nontunneled line insertion claims fell from 43.1 to 15.9 claims/10,000 (AAPC = -7.1; -7.3 to -7.0: P < .001) for surgeons, from 21.3 to 18.5 claims/10,000 (AAPC = -2.5; -2.8 to -2.1: P < .001) for radiologists, and from 117.4 to 72.7 claims/10,000 (AAPC = -5.2; 95% CI, -6.3 to -4.0: P < .001) for anesthesia providers. In contrast, line insertions increased from 18.2 to 26.0 claims/10,000 (AAPC = 3.2; 2.3-4.2: P < .001) for Emergency Physicians and from 3.2 to 9.3 claims/10,000 (AAPC = 6.0; 5.1-6.9: P < .001) for PAs and APNs who were not anesthesia providers. Among anesthesia providers, the share of line claims made by nurse anesthetists increased by 14.5% over the time period. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a 38.3% decrease in claims for nontunneled central lines placed by anesthesiologists from 2007 to 2016. These findings have implications for anesthesiology resident training and maintenance of competence among practicing clinicians. Further research is needed to clarify the effect of decreasing line insertion numbers on line insertion competence among anesthesiologists.


Assuntos
Anestesia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/tendências , Pessoal de Saúde , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfermeiros Anestesistas , Artéria Pulmonar , Cirurgiões , Estados Unidos
2.
Crit Care Med ; 47(5): 659-667, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730442

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Severe sepsis is a complex, resource intensive, and potentially lethal condition and rural patients have worse outcomes than urban patients. Early identification and treatment are important to improving outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify hospital-specific factors associated with inter-hospital transfer. DESIGN: Mixed method study integrating data from a telephone survey and retrospective cohort study of state administrative claims. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Survey of Iowa emergency department administrators between May 2017 and June 2017 and cohort of adults seen in Iowa emergency departments for severe sepsis and septic shock between January 2005 and December 2013. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of inter-hospital transfer. We included 114 institutions that provided data (response rate = 99%), and responses were linked to a total of 150,845 visits for severe sepsis/septic shock. In our adjusted model, having the capability to place central venous catheters or having a subscription to a tele-ICU service was independently associated with lower odds of inter-hospital transfer (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.86 and adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.88, respectively). A facility's participation in a sepsis-specific quality improvement initiative was associated with 62% higher odds of transfer (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.10-2.39). CONCLUSIONS: The insertion of central venous catheters and access to a critical care physician during sepsis treatment are important capabilities in hospitals that transfer fewer sepsis patients. In the future, hospital-specific capabilities may be used to identify institutions as regional sepsis centers.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Sepse/terapia , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Iowa , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Choque Séptico/terapia
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 68(4): 1166-1174, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30244924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study examines the utilization and outcomes of vascular access for long-term hemodialysis in the United States and describes the impact of temporizing catheter use on outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, patency, and associated patient survival for pre-emptively placed autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts; for autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts placed after a temporizing catheter; and for hemodialysis catheters that remained in use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who initiated hemodialysis in the United States during a 5-year period (2007-2011). The United States Renal Data System-Medicare matched national database was used to compare outcomes after pre-emptive autogenous fistulas, preemptive prosthetic grafts, autogenous fistula after temporizing catheter, prosthetic graft after temporizing catheter, and persistent catheter use. Outcomes were primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, maturation, catheter-free dialysis, severe access infection, and mortality. RESULTS: There were 73,884 (16%) patients who initiated hemodialysis with autogenous fistula, 16,533 (3%) who initiated hemodialysis with prosthetic grafts, 106,797 (22%) who temporized with hemodialysis catheter prior to autogenous fistula use, 32,890 (7%) who temporized with catheter prior to prosthetic graft use, and 246,822 (52%) patients who remained on the catheter. Maturation rate and median time to maturation were 79% vs 84% and 47 days vs 29 days for pre-emptively placed autogenous fistulas vs prosthetic grafts. Primary patency (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.28; P < .001) and primary assisted patency (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.35-1.38; P < .001) were significantly higher for autogenous fistula compared with prosthetic grafts. Secondary patency was higher for autogenous fistulas beyond 2 months (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32-1.40; P < .001). Severe infection (aHR, 9.6; 95% CI, 8.86-10.36; P < .001) and mortality (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.31; P < .001) were higher for prosthetic grafts compared with autogenous fistulas. Temporizing with a catheter was associated with a 51% increase in mortality (aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.48-1.53; P < .001), 69% decrease in primary patency (aHR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.31-0.32; P < .001), and 130% increase in severe infection (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.2-2.5; P < .001) compared to initiation with autogenous fistulas or prosthetic grafts. Mortality was 2.2 times higher for patients who remained on catheters compared to those who initiated hemodialysis with autogenous fistulas (aHR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.21-2.28; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporizing catheter use was associated with higher mortality, higher infection, and lower patency, thus undermining the highly prevalent approach of electively using catheters as a bridge to permanent access. Autogenous fistulas are associated with longer time to catheter-free dialysis but better patency, lower infection risk, and lower mortality compared with prosthetic grafts in the general population.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/tendências , Implante de Prótese Vascular/tendências , Cateterismo Venoso Central/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Diálise Renal/tendências , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Prótese Vascular/estatística & dados numéricos , Prótese Vascular/tendências , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/mortalidade , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/tendências , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
Neth J Med ; 76(4): 176-183, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29845940

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Literature in Europe regarding implementation of nurse practitioners or physician assistants in the intensive care unit (ICU) is lacking, while some available studies indicate that this concept can improve the quality of care and overcome physician shortages on ICUs. The aim of this study is to provide insight on how a Dutch ICU implemented non-physician providers (NPP), besides residents, and what this staffing model adds to the care on the ICU. METHODS: This paper defines the training course and job description of NPPs on a Dutch ICU. It describes the number and quality of invasive interventions performed by NPPs, residents, and intensivists during the years 2015 and 2016. Salary scales of NPPs and residents are provided to describe potential cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The tasks of NPPs on the ICU are equal to those of the residents. Analysis of the invasive interventions performed by NPPs showed an incidence of central venous catheter insertion for NPPs of 20 per fulltime equivalent (FTE) and for residents 4.3 per FTE in one year. For arterial catheters the NPP inserted 61.7 per FTE and the residents inserted 11.8 per FTE. The complication rate of both groups was in line with recent literature. Regarding their salary: after five years in service an NPP earns more than a starting resident. CONCLUSION: This is the first European study which describes the role of NPPs on the ICU and shows that practical interventions normally performed by physicians can be performed with equal safety and quality by NPPs.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Profissionais de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Assistentes Médicos/organização & administração , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Artérias , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Internato e Residência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Organizacionais , Profissionais de Enfermagem/economia , Profissionais de Enfermagem/educação , Assistentes Médicos/economia , Assistentes Médicos/educação , Papel Profissional , Salários e Benefícios
5.
J Hosp Med ; 12(8): 646-651, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28786431

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding rates of mechanical complications of ultrasound-guided, nontunneled central venous catheters (CVC). Similarly, trainee perceptions surrounding CVC complications are largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate contemporary CVC mechanical complication rates, associated risk factors, and trainee perspectives. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective review of CVC procedures between June 1, 2014, and May 1, 2015. Electronic survey distributed to internal medicine trainees. SETTING: Intensive care units and the emergency department at an academic hospital. MEASUREMENTS: Electronic health records of patients with CVC procedures were reviewed for complications. Demographic and procedural characteristics were compared for complicated vs uncomplicated procedures. Student t tests and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 730 reviewed records, 14 serious mechanical complications occurred due to pneumothorax (n = 5), bleeding (n = 3), vascular injury (n = 3), stroke (n = 1), and death (n = 2). Risk factors for complicated vs uncomplicated CVC placement included subclavian location (21.4% vs 7.8%, 𝑃 = 0.001), number of attempts (2.2 vs 1.5, 𝑃 = 0.02), unsuccessful CVC (21.4% vs. 4.3%, 𝑃 = 0.001), attending supervision (61.5% vs 34.7%, 𝑃 = 0.04), low body mass index (mean 25.7 kg/ m² vs 31.5 kg/m², 𝑃 = 0.001), anticoagulation (28.6% vs 20.6%, 𝑃 = 0.048), and ventilation (78.5% vs 66.5%, 𝑃 = 0.001). Survey data suggested deficiencies in managing unsuccessful CVC procedures; specifically, only 35% (N = 21/60) of trainees regularly perform chest x-rays after failed CVC attempt. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a 1.9% rate of mechanical complications associated with CVC placement. Our study confirms historical data that unsuccessful CVC attempts are an important risk factor for complications. Education regarding unsuccessful CVC placement may improve patient safety.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Interna/educação , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia
6.
Infez Med ; 25(2): 108-115, 2017 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28603228

RESUMO

We describe the methods used to define a surveillance model to incorporate into activities aimed at preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in non-critical care units (NCCUs) and designed to be implemented at the regional level. In 2015 we conducted a pilot feasibility study in three NCCUs based in hospitals of the Regional Health System of Emilia Romagna to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed model and to test its accuracy and cost-effectiveness in terms of resources needed to maintain the system. Our results indicate that the system is feasible at the regional level by using the available sources and instruments to collect data in clinical practice context. Observation of device utilization for at least three months in all NCCU wards is needed in order to prioritize the medical area on which to focus costs for surveillance prior to implementing it on a regular basis.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Modelos Teóricos , Vigilância da População , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Coleta de Dados , Estudos de Viabilidade , Unidades Hospitalares , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/economia , Itália/epidemiologia , Projetos Piloto
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 82, 2017 01 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28095785

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The emergence and spread of Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) is becoming a serious problem in Chinese hospitals, however, the data on this is scarce. Therefore, we investigate the risk factors for healthcare-associated CREC infection and study the incidence, antibiotic resistance and medical costs of CREC infections in our hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, matched case-control-control, parallel study in a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients admitted between January 2012 and December 2015 were included in this study. For patients with healthcare-associated CREC infection, two matched subject groups were created; one group with healthcare-associated CSEC infection and the other group without infection. RESULTS: Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated that prior hospital stay (<6 months) (OR:3.96; 95%CI:1.26-12.42), tracheostomy (OR:2.24; 95%CI: 1.14-4.38), central venous catheter insertion (OR: 8.15; 95%CI: 2.31-28.72), carbapenem exposure (OR: 12.02; 95%CI: 1.52-95.4), urinary system disease (OR: 16.69; 95%CI: 3.01-89.76), low hemoglobin (OR: 2.83; 95%CI: 1.46-5.50), and high blood glucose are associated (OR: 7.01; 95%CI: 1.89-26.02) with CREC infection. Total costs (p = 0.00), medical examination costs (p = 0.00), medical test costs (p = 0.00), total drug costs (p = 0.00) and ant-infective drug costs (p = 0.00) for the CREC group were significantly higher than those for the no infection group. Medical examination costs (p = 0.03), total drug costs (p = 0.03), and anti-infective drug costs (p = 0.01) for the CREC group were significantly higher than for the CSEC group. Mortality in CREC group was significantly higher than the CSEC group (p = 0.01) and no infection group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Many factors were discovered for acquisition of healthcare-associated CREC infection. CREC isolates were resistant to most antibiotics, and had some association with high financial burden and increased mortality.


Assuntos
Carbapenêmicos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Custos de Medicamentos , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/economia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hemoglobinas , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/epidemiologia , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Traqueostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Urológicas/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 53, 2017 01 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary and (peripheral and central) intravenous catheters are widely used in hospitalized patients. However, up to 56% of the catheters do not have an appropriate indication and some serious complications with the use of these catheters can occur. The main objective of our quality improvement project is to reduce the use of catheters without an appropriate indication by 25-50%, and to evaluate the affecting factors of our de-implementation strategy. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective interrupted time series analysis, several interventions to avoid inappropriate use of catheters will be conducted in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Firstly, we will define a list of appropriate indications for urinary and (peripheral and central) intravenous catheters, which will restrict the use of catheters and urge catheter removal when the indication is no longer appropriate. Secondly, after the baseline measurements, the intervention will take place, which consists of a kick-off meeting, including a competitive feedback report of the baseline measurements, and education of healthcare workers and patients. Additional strategies based on the baseline data and local conditions are optional. The primary endpoint is the percentage of catheters with an inappropriate indication on the day of data collection before and after the de-implementation strategy. Secondary endpoints are catheter-related infections or other complications, catheter re-insertion rate, length of hospital (and ICU) stay and mortality. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the de-implementation strategy will be calculated. DISCUSSION: This study aims to reduce the use of urinary and intravenous catheters with an inappropriate indication, and as a result reduce the catheter-related complications. If (cost-) effective it provides a tool for a nationwide approach to reduce catheter-related infections and other complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial registry: NTR6015 . Registered 9 August 2016.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Periférico/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres de Demora/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Urinário/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres Urinários/virologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Bacteriemia/economia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/economia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Masculino , Países Baixos , Estudos Prospectivos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Urinários/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/economia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia
9.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 12(1): 190-199, 2017 01 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28062678

RESUMO

Recent Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policies have used dialysis facility practice variation to develop public ratings and adjust payments. In the Dialysis Facility Compare star rating system (DFC SRS), facility-relative rates of performance-based clinical measures varied nearly two-fold for mortality (standardized mortality ratio; 10th/90th percentiles: 0.71, 1.34) and hospitalization (standardized hospitalization ratio; 10th/90th percentiles: 0.64, 1.37), and nearly four-fold for transfusion (standardized transfusion ratio; 10th/90th percentiles: 0.43, 1.65). Medicare claims data (from July of 2014) demonstrate that facility variation for the proportions of patients on hemodialysis hospitalized (10th/90th percentiles: 27%, 50%) and transfused (10th/90th percentiles: 3%, 17%) within 6 months that far exceeds relatively modest recent overall longitudinal trends. DFC SRS-rated facility variation is also substantial for fistula (10th/90th percentiles: 50%, 78%) and catheter use >90 days (10th/90th percentiles: 3%, 19%). By contrast, DFC SRS-rated facility distributions for adult hemodialysis Kt/V>1.2 (10th/90th percentiles: 84%, 97%) and total serum calcium >10.2 mg/dl (median, 1%; 75th/90th percentiles: 3%, 5%) are quite narrow and may be of questionable value. Likewise, variation in the US Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study is over two-fold for facility median serum parathyroid hormone (10th/90th percentiles: 290 pg/ml, 629 pg/ml) and ferritin (10th/90th percentiles: 469 ng/ml, 1143 ng/ml) levels, and facility mean treatment time varies by 30 minutes (10th/90th percentiles: 204 minutes, 234 minutes). Rising serum parathyroid hormone and ferritin levels, and generally short dialysis treatment time, represent areas unchecked by existing policy; both overall trends and facility variation in these values may reflect unintended consequences of policy or reimbursement pressures and therefore raise concern. Additionally, outcomes in the transition period from advanced CKD to dialysis remain poor, and policy initiatives and performance accountability in this area remain insufficient. Innovative models of comprehensive care in advanced CKD and the early dialysis period which are more amenable to policy oversight are needed. In summary, facility variation is typically larger than prevailing longitudinal trends, and should not be overlooked. The combination of nationally representative observational databases (e.g., the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study) and ESRD registries can provide policy makers with additional tools to evaluate facility variation, develop policies, and monitor unintended effects.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/etiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/normas , Estados Unidos
10.
Anaesthesia ; 72(3): 328-334, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27981565

RESUMO

Despite the high number of central venous access devices inserted annually, there are limited data on the incidence of the associated procedural complications, many of which carry substantial clinical risk. This point was highlighted in the recently published Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland 'Safe vascular access 2016' guidelines. This trainee-led snapshot study aimed to identify the number of central venous catheter insertions and the incidence of serious complications across multiple hospital sites within a fixed two-week period. Secondary aims were to identify the availability of resources and infrastructure to facilitate safe central venous catheter insertion and management of potential complications. Fifteen hospital sites participated, completing an initial resource survey and daily identification of all adult central venous catheter insertions, with subsequent review of any complications detected. A total of 487 central venous catheter insertions were identified, of which 15 (3.1%) were associated with a significant procedural complication. The most common complication was failure of insertion, which occurred in seven (1.4%) cases. Facilities to enable safer central venous catheter insertion and manage complications varied widely between hospitals, with little evidence of standardisation of guidelines or protocols.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Competência Clínica , Inglaterra , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Auditoria Médica/métodos , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Gestão da Segurança/normas , Falha de Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
JAMA Intern Med ; 176(10): 1492-1499, 2016 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27532500

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Maximizing the value of critical care services requires understanding the relationship between intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, clinical outcomes, and costs. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether hospitals had consistent patterns of ICU utilization across 4 common medical conditions and the association between higher use of the ICU and hospital costs, use of invasive procedures, and mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of 156 842 hospitalizations in 94 acute-care nonfederal hospitals for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), pulmonary embolism (PE), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), and congestive heart failure (CHF) in Washington state and Maryland from 2010 to 2012. Hospitalizations for DKA, PE, UGIB, and CHF were identified from the presence of compatible International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to determine the predicted hospital-level ICU utilization during hospitalizations for the 4 study conditions. For each condition, hospitals were ranked based on the predicted ICU utilization rate to examine the variability in ICU utilization across institutions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were associations between hospital-level ICU utilization rates and risk-adjusted hospital mortality, use of invasive procedures, and hospital costs. RESULTS: The 94 hospitals and 156 842 hospitalizations included in the study represented 4.7% of total hospitalizations in this study. ICU admission rates ranged from 16.3% to 81.2% for DKA, 5.0% to 44.2% for PE, 11.5% to 51.2% for UGIB, and 3.9% to 48.8% for CHF. Spearman rank coefficients between DKA, PE, UGIB, and CHF showed significant correlations in ICU utilization for these 4 medical conditions among hospitals (ρ ≥ 0.90 for all comparisons; P < .01 for all). For each condition, hospital-level ICU utilization rate was not associated with hospital mortality. Use of invasive procedures and costs of hospitalization were greater in institutions with higher ICU utilization for all 4 conditions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For medical conditions where ICU care is frequently provided, but may not always be necessary, institutions that utilize ICUs more frequently are more likely to perform invasive procedures and have higher costs but have no improvement in hospital mortality. Hospitals had similar ICU utilization patterns across the 4 medical conditions, suggesting that systematic institutional factors may influence decisions to potentially overutilize ICU care. Interventions that seek to improve the value of critical care services will need to address these factors that lead clinicians to admit patients to higher levels of care when equivalent care can be delivered elsewhere in the hospital.


Assuntos
Cetoacidose Diabética/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Cetoacidose Diabética/economia , Cetoacidose Diabética/terapia , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/economia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/economia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Número de Leitos em Hospital , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Embolia Pulmonar/economia , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Washington/epidemiologia
12.
Urol Oncol ; 34(10): 431.e17-24, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27372282

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with radical cystectomy operative time among Medicare beneficiaries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we identified 4,975 patients who underwent a radical cystectomy during 1991 to 2007. Using a validated method of using anesthesia administrative data to quantify operative time, we used generalized estimating equations to examine the association of patient, provider, and hospital factors on radical cystectomy operative time. RESULTS: We found that mean operative time decreased by 5 minutes per year (Δ = -5.3min/y, P<0.001). Longer operative times were found in academic centers (Δ =+39.0min vs. nonacademic), continent diversion (Δ =+34.9min vs. ileal conduit), surgical excision of≥11 lymph nodes (Δ =+24.9min vs. 1-5), female (Δ =+32.3min vs. male sex), and perioperative anesthesia procedures such as placement of central venous catheters or arterial lines (Δ =+47.2min vs. no procedures), respectively (all P<0.01). In adjusted analysis, higher surgeon volume (Δ =-22.0min vs. lowest volume) was associated with shorter operative times (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Operative times for cystectomy have been steadily decreasing annually. There is notable variation based on academic affiliation, diversion type and extent of lymphadenectomy, surgeon and hospital volumes, as well as use of anesthetic procedures. Efforts to improve operative time by selective referral to high-volume surgeons or hospitals or both, or judicious use of perioperative procedures may have a positive effect on health care costs and overall quality of care for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.


Assuntos
Cistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Excisão de Linfonodo/estatística & dados numéricos , Duração da Cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Registro Médico Coordenado , Medicare , Programa de SEER , Fatores Sexuais , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Derivação Urinária/métodos , Derivação Urinária/estatística & dados numéricos , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(5): 550-6, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25772996

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Adherence engineering applies human factors principles to examine non-adherence within a specific task and to guide the development of materials or equipment to increase protocol adherence and reduce human error. Central line maintenance (CLM) for intensive care unit (ICU) patients is a task through which error or non-adherence to protocols can cause central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). We conducted an economic analysis of an adherence engineering CLM kit designed to improve the CLM task and reduce the risk of CLABSI. METHODS: We constructed a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of the CLM kit, which contains each of the 27 items necessary for performing the CLM procedure, compared with the standard care procedure for CLM, in which each item for dressing maintenance is gathered separately. We estimated the model using the cost of CLABSI overall ($45,685) as well as the excess LOS (6.9 excess ICU days, 3.5 excess general ward days). RESULTS: Assuming the CLM kit reduces the risk of CLABSI by 100% and 50%, this strategy was less costly (cost savings between $306 and $860) and more effective (between 0.05 and 0.13 more quality-adjusted life-years) compared with not using the pre-packaged kit. We identified threshold values for the effectiveness of the kit in reducing CLABSI for which the kit strategy was no longer less costly. CONCLUSION: An adherence engineering-based intervention to streamline the CLM process can improve patient outcomes and lower costs. Patient safety can be improved by adopting new approaches that are based on human factors principles.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/economia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
16.
BMC Nephrol ; 15: 30, 2014 Feb 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24507475

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The choice of vascular access type is an important aspect of care for incident hemodialysis patients. However, data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medical Evidence Report (form CMS-2728) identifying the first access for incident patients have not previously been validated. Medicare began requiring that vascular access type be reported on claims in July 2010. We aimed to determine the agreement between the reported vascular access at initiation from form CMS-2728 and from Medicare claims. METHODS: This retrospective study used a cohort of 9777 patients who initiated dialysis in the latter half of 2010 and were eligible for Medicare at the start of renal replacement therapy to compare the vascular access type reported on form CMS-2728 with the type reported on Medicare outpatient dialysis claims for the same patients. For each patient, the reported access from each data source was compiled; the percent agreement represented the percent of patients for whom the access was the same. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify characteristics associated with the agreement of reported access. RESULTS: The two data sources agreed for 94% of patients, with a Kappa statistic of 0.83, indicating an excellent level of agreement. Further, we found no evidence to suggest that agreement was associated with the patient characteristics of age, sex, race, or primary cause of renal failure. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that vascular access data as reported on form CMS-2728 are valid and reliable for use in research studies.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Notificação de Abuso , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/classificação , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos
17.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 29(12): 1245-8, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24257587

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A growing body of literature supports the use of ultrasound (US) to assist central venous catheter (CVC) placement, and in many settings, this has become the standard of care. However, this remains a relatively new and uncommonly performed procedure for pediatric emergency medicine physicians. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the change over time in percentage of CVC procedures performed with US assistance per 10,000 patient visits in a pediatric emergency department. METHODS: We describe the development of an emergency US program in a pediatric emergency department and investigate how US use for CVC placement in internal jugular and femoral veins changed from July 2007, when US became available, until December 2011. Data related to CVC procedures were obtained from a procedure database maintained for quality assurance purposes. RESULTS: The percentage of CVC procedures performed with US assistance increased significantly over time (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The development of an emergency US program was associated with significantly increased physician use of US for CVC placement.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/organização & administração , Educação Médica Continuada/organização & administração , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/educação , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/organização & administração , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Boston , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/tendências , Criança , Bolsas de Estudo , Veia Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Veias Jugulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/estatística & dados numéricos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/tendências
18.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 10(11): 864-8, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24075218

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate catheter requests at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) led to significantly increased costs and early catheter malfunction or infection. Dual-lumen catheters were often requested and inserted when only a single lumen was required, and inappropriate catheter care on the wards led to early infection or thrombosis. METHODS: A full-time registered nurse was hired to analyze and transform the vascular access program of the MUHC. Catheter selection was streamlined on the basis of clinical unit need. Clinical and cost data were collected between May 2011 and January 2012. RESULTS: Requests for vascular access at the MUHC have been standardized and centralized. Single-lumen catheters are inserted unless a specific indication for a dual-lumen catheter is provided. To date, data have been collected on >4,000 catheter insertions, both before and after the switch to the single-lumen program. Dual-lumen catheters have been required in only 50% of cases. Reinsertion rates have decreased, leading to the first year-over-year reduction in peripherally inserted central venous catheter insertion since data collection began in 2002. The program has also resulted in significant reductions in central line-associated bloodstream infection and catheter-related thrombosis. Decreased maintenance and reinsertion costs have led to overall savings for the MUHC of approximately $1.1 million.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/economia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiografia Intervencionista/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Redução de Custos/economia , Redução de Custos/métodos , Redução de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Doses de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica/economia , Proteção Radiológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiografia Intervencionista/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 10(8): 603-12, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23770064

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate national trends in central venous access (CVA) procedures over 2 decades with regard to changing specialty group roles and places of service. METHODS: Aggregated claims data for temporary central venous catheter and long-term CVA device (CVAD) procedures were extracted from Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files from 1992 through 2011. Central venous catheter and CVAD procedure volumes by specialty group and place of service were studied. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 2011, temporary and long-term CVA placement procedures increased from 638,703 to 808,071 (+27%) and from 76,444 to 316,042 (+313%), respectively. For temporary central venous catheters, radiology (from 0.4% in 1992 to 32.6% in 2011) now exceeds anesthesiology (from 37% to 22%) and surgery (from 30.4% to 11.7%) as the dominant provider group. Surgery continues to dominate in placement and explantation of long-term CVADs (from 80.7% to 50.4% and from 81.6% to 47.7%, respectively), but radiology's share has grown enormously (from 0.7% to 37.6% and from 0.2% to 28.6%). Although volumes remain small (<10% of all procedures), midlevel practitioners have experienced >100-fold growth for most services. The inpatient hospital remains the dominant site for temporary CVA procedures (90.0% in 1992 and 81.2% in 2011), but the placement of long-term CVADs has shifted from the inpatient (from 68.9% to 45.2%) to hospital outpatient (from 26.9% to 44.3%) setting. In all hospital settings combined, radiologists place approximately half of all tunneled catheters and three-quarters all peripherally inserted central catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 2 decades, CVA procedures on Medicare beneficiaries have increased considerably. Radiology is now the dominant overall provider.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiologia Intervencionista/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/economia , Current Procedural Terminology , Humanos , Medicare/economia , Radiologia Intervencionista/economia , Estados Unidos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
20.
J Perinatol ; 32(12): 941-6, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22343397

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare complication rates between peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and peripherally inserted non-central catheters (PINCCs) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study was conducted. The PICCs were catheters whose tip terminated in the vena cavae, and PINCCs were defined as those whose tip fell short of this location. Complication rates were assessed using generalized estimating equations modeling. RESULT: A total of 91 PINCCs and 889 PICCs were placed in 750 neonates. In all, 44.0% of PINCCs had a major complication compared with 25.2% of PICCs (P=0.0001). The unadjusted (unadj.) complication rate among PINCCs was 51.7 per 1000 line days and 15.9 for PICCs (unadj. rate ratio: 3.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.32, 4.55). After adjusting for multiple confounders, the risk remained significantly higher for PINCCs (adjusted odds ratio: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.33, 4.37). CONCLUSION: The rate of associated complications with the use of PINCCs in the NICU population is more than twice that of the PICCs.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Connecticut , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Falha de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Controle de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA