Reliability assessment of new radiographic scales to evaluate radiolucency and bony in-between fin growth of partially cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components.

BACKGROUND: Current methods available for assessment of radiolucency and in-between fin (IBF) growth of a glenoid component have not undergone interobserver reliability testing for an all-polyethylene fluted central peg (FCP) glenoid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate anteroposterior radiographs of an FCP glenoid component at ≥48 months comparing commonly used scales to a new method adapted to the FCP. Our hypothesis was that the new method would result in acceptable intra- and interobserver agreement and a more accurate description of radiographic findings. METHODS: We reviewed ≥48-month follow-up radiographs of patients treated with a primary aTSA using an FCP glenoid. Eighty-three patients were included in the review. Radiographs were evaluated by 5 reviewers using novel IBF radiodensity and radiolucency assessments and the Wirth and Lazarus methods. To assess intraobserver reliability, a subset of 40 images was reviewed. Kappa statistics were calculated to determine intra- and interobserver reliability; correlations were assessed using Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (κ score) was as follows: IBF 0.71, radiolucency 0.68, Wirth 0.48, and Lazarus 0.22. Intraobserver agreement ranges were as follows: IBF radiodensity 0.36-0.67, radiolucency 0.55-0.62, Wirth 0.11-0.73, and Lazarus 0.04-0.46. Correlation analysis revealed the following: IBF to Wirth r = 0.93, radiolucency to Lazarus r = 0.92 (P value <.001 for all). CONCLUSION: This study introduces a radiographic assessment method developed specifically for an FCP glenoid component. Results show high interobserver and acceptable intraobserver reliability for the method presented in this study. The new scales provide a more accurate description of radiographic findings, helping to identify glenoid components that may be at risk for loosening.

Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Although the effect of 3-dimensional (3D) planning for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) on component positioning and patient outcomes has been increasingly studied, the effect of 3D planning on surgeon decision making has not been well studied. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a database containing TSA cases for which the glenoid component was planned with a commercially available 3D computed tomography software program (Virtual Implant Positioning; Arthrex, Inc.) from 2016 to 2019. A total of 6483 cases planned by 417 surgeons were included. The glenoid version (Vtech) and inclination (Itech) of the Virtual Implant Positioning technician plan as well as the surgeon's final plan for version (Vsurg) and inclination (Isurg) were extracted. When the version and/or inclination of the surgeon plan matched that of the technician, that variable was defined as "accepted." The rates of acceptance of Vtech and Itech were calculated and analyzed for association with implant type, native version and inclination, and running case count. A subgroup analysis of high-volume users (n > 30 cases) was analyzed to determine if any of the variables independently was associated with surgeon acceptance. RESULTS: There was a very high rate of matching of version (66%), inclination (72%), or both (55%) and a low rate (18%) where neither parameter of the glenoid plan matched that of the technician. In univariate analysis, as the case count and retroversion increased the rate of accepting of version dropped noticeably (70%-50% and 47%, respectively [ P< .0001]). The rate of accepting the plan for inclination did not vary much as case count changed. In the multivariate analysis, 23 of 56 high-volume surgeons had at least 1 independent factor associated with accepting the technician-planned glenoid version, and 5 surgeons had 2 independent factors. In the multivariate analysis of matching glenoid inclination, 27 of 56 high-volume surgeons had at least 1 independent factor associated with accepting the technician-planned glenoid version, and 9 surgeons had 2 or more independent factors. CONCLUSIONS: In a large database of TSAs with 3D-planned glenoids, there were high rates of cases with surgeon agreement with an initial plan provided by an industry technician: 66% in version, 72% in inclination, 55% for both version and inclination. Surgeon acceptance of the initial plan decreased as pathoanatomy increased and case count increased. Shoulder surgeons should be aware that an initial 3D preoperative plan provided by industry represents a potential source of cognitive bias in shoulder arthroplasty planning.

Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone.

BACKGROUND: Commercially available preoperative planning software is now widely available for shoulder arthroplasty. However, without the use of patient-specific guides or intraoperative visual guidance, surgeons have little in vivo feedback to ensure proper execution of the preoperative plan. The purpose of this study was to assess surgeons' ability to implement a preoperative plan in vivo during shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Fifty primary shoulder arthroplasties from a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. All surgical procedures were planned using a commercially available software package with both multiplanar 2-dimensional computed tomography and a 3-dimensional implant overlay. Following registration of intraoperative visual navigation trackers, the surgeons (1 attending and 1 fellow) were blinded to the computer navigation screen and attempted to implement the plan by simulating placement of a central-axis guide pin. Malposition was assessed (>4 mm of displacement or >10° error in version or inclination). Data were then blinded, measured, and evaluated. RESULTS: Mean displacement from the planned starting point was 3.2 ± 2.0 mm. The mean error in version was 6.4° ± 5.6°, and the mean error in inclination was 6.6° ± 4.9°. Malposition was observed in 48% of cases after preoperative planning. Malposition errors were more commonly made by fellow trainees vs. attending surgeons (58% vs. 38%, P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: Despite preoperative planning, surgeons of various training levels were unable to reproducibly replicate the planned component position consistently. Following completion of fellowship training, significantly less malposition resulted. Even in expert hands, the orientation of the glenoid component would have been malpositioned in 38% of cases. This study further supports the benefit of guided surgery for accurate placement of glenoid components, regardless of fellowship training.

Assessment of surgeon variability in preoperative planning of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative planning software is gaining utility in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), particularly when addressing pathologic glenoid wear. The purpose of this study was to quantify inter- and intrasurgeon variability in preoperative planning a series of RTSA cases to identify differences in how surgeons consider optimal implant placement. This may help identify opportunities to establish consensus when correlating plan differences with clinical data. METHODS: A total of 49 computed tomography scans from actual RTSA cases were planned for RTSA by 9 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons using the same platform (Exactech GPS, Exactech Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA). Each case was planned a second time 6-12 weeks later. Variability within and between surgeons was measured for implant selection, version correction, inclination correction, and implant face position. Interclass correlation coefficients, and Pearson and Light's kappa coefficient were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was considerable variation in the frequency of augmented baseplate selection between surgeons and between rounds for the same surgeon. Thresholds for augment use also varied between surgeons. Interclass correlation coefficients for intersurgeon variability ranged from 0.43 for version, 0.42 for inclination, and 0.25 for baseplate type. Pearson coefficients for intrasurgeon variability were 0.34 for version and 0.30 for inclination. Light's kappa coefficient for baseplate type was 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates substantial variability both between surgeons and between rounds for individual surgeons when planning RTSA. Although average differences between plans were relatively small, there were large differences in specific cases suggesting little consensus on optimal planning parameters and opportunities to establish guidelines based on glenoid pathoanatomy. The correlation of preoperative planning with clinical outcomes will help to establish such guidelines.

Quantitative in vivo assessment of bone allograft viability using 18F-fluoride PET/CT after glenoid augmentation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Success after glenoid bone augmentation in total shoulder arthroplasty depends on osseous integration and non-resorption. Standard imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and X-rays, cannot quantify bone viability. Therefore, we introduce a new technique to assess graft viability using 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET-CT for femoral allografts in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient charts were reviewed following glenoid augmentation using femoral allografts in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. A total of seven patients were included in this study. 18F-NaF PET-CT was used to assess graft viability and graft fusion. Semiquantitative assessment of 18F-NaF uptake was performed by means of a standardized uptake value (SUV). Radiographs were used to assess fusion. The mean age of the patients at the time of follow-up was 83.4 years (range 79-92), and the mean follow-up was 44.4 months. RESULTS: Viability and fusion were confirmed in all allografts using semiquantitative analysis of 18F-NaF PET-CT by means of standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Metabolic activity of medullary region of a vertebral spine was defined as a reference background. The mean value of maximum tracer activity in the allograft was not statistically different from native bone in the reference vertebrae (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: 18F-NaF PET-CT is a practicable tool to quantitatively assess viability in large bone allografts after glenoid augmentation in RSA. The study shows viability and fusion in all allografts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, treatment study.

Clinical outcomes and radiologic assessment of a modified suture button arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.

BACKGROUND: As several neurologic and hardware complications have been reported with screw fixation. Suture buttons are used to serve as an alternative to screw fixation to obtain better outcome and to reduce the complication. The purpose of this study was to observe the clinical outcomes and make the radiologic assessment of a modified suture button (MSB) arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. METHODS: A total of ninty-one patients with recurrent shoulder joint dislocation who underwent MSB arthroscopic Latarjet procedure was retrospectively reviewed. Fifty cases identified from the chart review met the inclusion criteria. The clinical outcomes and position of the grafts, glenohumeral degeneration, and graft healing condition were assessed postoperatively in a follow-up with at least one and half of a year. RESULTS: All the fifty patients were satisfied with their clinical outcome. The overall complication rate was 4% in this study. The mean visual analog scale score, the affected shoulder active mobility in Ers(external rotation at the side), Era(external rotation in abduction) decreased significantly; the ASES score, Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score improved significantly. CT scans in the sagittal view showed that grafts in 88% of cases were in good position, grafts in 12% of cases were fixed too superiorly and inferiorly. In the axial view grafts in forty cases were flush with the glenoid rim, ten were considered as too lateral. The ten grafts became remodeled and were more flush with the glenoid rim in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The MSB arthroscopic Latarjet procedure provides excellent outcome with few complications, and no degenerative changes were observed in the follow-up. Moreover, the graft fixed too laterally presented a phenomenon of remodeling and became flush with the glenoid rim over time.

Multilevel glenoid morphology and retroversion assessment in Walch B2 and B3 types.

OBJECTIVE: A major factor that impacts the long-term outcome and complication rates of total shoulder arthroplasty is the preoperative posterior glenoid bone loss quantified by glenoid retroversion. The purpose of this study was to assess if glenoid retroversion varies significantly at different glenoid heights in Walch B2 and B3 glenoids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with B2 and B3 glenoid types were included following retrospective review of 386 consecutive CT shoulder studies performed for arthroplasty preoperative planning. True axial CT reconstructions were created using a validated technique. Two readers independently measured the glenoid retroversion angles according to the Friedman method using the "intermediate" glenoid at three glenoid heights: 75% (upper), 50% (equator), and 25% (lower). The variances between the three levels for a given patient were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-nine B2 and 8 B3 glenoid types were included. There was no significant difference in variance of glenoid version among the three levels in B2 or B3 groups. The mean variance in retroversion degree between equator-lower, upper-equator, and upper-lower glenoid was - 0.4, 0.3, and - 0.2 for B2; and - 0.2, 1.9, and 1.9 for B3 glenoid, respectively. The level of inter-reader agreement was fair to good for variance at equator-lower, and good to excellent for upper-equator and upper-lower glenoid. CONCLUSIONS: Glenoid version can be accurately measured at any level between 25 and 75% of glenoid height for Walch B2 and B3. We recommend that the glenoid equator be used as the reference to assure consistent and reliable version measurements in this group of patients.

Superior glenoid inclination and glenoid bone loss : Definition, assessment, biomechanical consequences, and surgical options.

Correct anatomical alignment of the glenoid component is of central importance for wear and loosening in shoulder endoprostheses. The aim of this article is to review and clarify the biomechanical and clinical effects of incorrect glenoid inclination in reverse and anatomical joint replacements. Based on the literature and on our own work, statements are made about the following: (1) the glenoid inclination of a normal glenoid, a degenerative glenoid and a glenoid implant, and the consequences if superior inclination is too large, and (2) the surgical technique as well as tips and tricks for correct adjustment of the inclination. The inclination of the glenoid plane is a morphological parameter of the scapula with high individual variation and is best measured using reformatted computed tomography using three-dimensional software for reconstruction and evaluation. The standard value is between 0 and 10°. Excessive superior inclination promotes translation of the humeral head and the formation of rotator cuff tears-in a degenerative glenoid, to superior wear. The correct amount of superior inclination of the glenoid component is essential for the survival of the implant. Positioning without excessive superior inclination is therefore mandatory. Precise preoperative determination of glenoid inclination and wear is important in order to correctly plan the positioning of an implant. This serves as the basis for deciding whether a bone graft or patient-specific instrumentation is necessary. Thus, the surgeon also has prognostic parameters for the anticipation of possible complications as a result of the bone defect and abnormal orientation. However, the evaluation must always include the position of the scapula in these considerations.

Influence of scapular tilt on radiographic assessment of the glenoid component after total shoulder arthroplasty: which radiographic landmarks are reliable?

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty has been shown to improve function and to reduce pain in cases of osteoarthritis. To assess loosening of the glenoid component, serial evaluation of frontal plane radiographs of the scapula has been established as the "gold standard." The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of different bone landmarks when the scapula is tilted compared with the ideal view. METHODS: Glenoid components were implanted into 6 human cadaveric scapulae. Radiographs were taken exactly anterior-posterior in the frontal plane as well as craniocaudal tilted (±15° and ±30°) and mediolateral tilted (±10° and ±20°). The following landmarks were evaluated: lateral margin of the scapula, medial margin of the scapula, floor of the fossa supraspinatus line, spine of the scapula line, glenoid fossa line, and coracoid base line. RESULTS: In evaluating the inclination of the glenoid component, the medial margin of the scapula had the best intraobserver and interobserver reliability with a variance for each of 2° ± 1° (P < .0001), whereas the lateral margin of the scapula had an acceptable intraobserver and interobserver reliability with a variance of 4° ± 1° and 3° ± 1°. In measuring medial migration, the glenoid fossa line had a significantly lower intraobserver and interobserver reliability than the coracoid base line (each 1 ± 0 mm vs. 3 ± 1 mm and 3 ± 2 mm; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: To assess the inclination of the glenoid component, the medial margin of the scapula has proven best, and the lateral margin of the scapula has acceptable reliability. For measuring medial migration, the coracoid base line has proven acceptable reliability, whereas the glenoid fossa line would be subject to change when osteolysis occurs at the glenoid.

Assessment of approximate glenoid size in Thai people.

BACKGROUND: The loosening of the glenoid baseplate component is one of the most common complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The mismatch between size of baseplate and glenoid in Thai People may result in improper baseplate screw fixation and lead to early loosening of the glenoid component. Knowing of the glenoid size will guide the surgeon in placing or choosing the proper size glenoid baseplate to improve screw fixation strength. OBJECTIVE: Study the size ofglenoid in Thai people and compare with previous studies. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors measured the glenoid size in anteroposterior and superoinferior directions, the data were recorded in term of mean and standard deviation. The present data were then compared with the previous glenoid studies to identify the differences in size between Thai people and others. RESULTS: Among 160 patients with the mean age of 58.2 +/- 14.2 years, the overall glenoid sizefor the entire study group were 32.3 +/- 3.2 mm and 24.4 +/- 3.2 mm in superoinferior (SI) and anteroposterior (AP) directions, respectively. The male glenoid size were 35.6 +/- 2.6 mm and 26.7 +/- 2.5 mm in SI andAP directions, respectively. The female glenoid SI diameter were 31.0+1.9 mm and in AP diameter were 22.0 +/- 1.7 mm. The glenoid size in Thai people was significantly smaller than the glenoid size from previous studies in Caucasians. CONCLUSION: The overall glenoid size in Thai people was significantly smaller than the previous studies in Caucasians. The female glenoid was also smaller than with the male. These findings alert surgeons to choose the proper glenoid baseplate design to avoid an overhang problem and improve screw fixation, especially in Thaifemale patients.

An anatomic, computed tomographic assessment of the coracoid process with special reference to the congruent-arc latarjet procedure.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the dimensions of the coracoid and to compare the radius of curvature (ROC) of the intact glenoid to the ROC of the coracoid undersurface, as oriented in the congruent-arc Latarjet procedure. The ROC of the coracoid undersurface was also compared with various glenoid bone loss scenarios. METHODS: Thirty-four computed tomography-based 3-dimensional models of the shoulder were examined by use of commercially available software. The mean dimensions of the coracoid were determined, and the ROC was calculated for the coracoid undersurface, the intact glenoid, and 20%, 35%, and 50% anterior glenoid bone loss scenarios. Intra-rater and inter-rater statistics were calculated. RESULTS: The mean length, width, and thickness of the coracoid were 16.8 mm (SD, 2.5 mm), 15.0 mm (SD, 2.2 mm), and 10.5 mm (SD, 1.7 mm), respectively. The mean ROC values were 13.6 mm (SD, 3.4 mm) for the coracoid, 13.8 mm (SD, 2.1 mm) for the intact glenoid, 27.6 mm (SD, 5.3 mm) for 20% anterior glenoid bone loss, 30.5 mm (SD, 5.2 mm) for 35% bone loss, and 33.3 mm (SD, 5.2 mm) for 50% bone loss. The coracoid ROC was not significantly different from the intact glenoid (P = .75); however, it was significantly less (P < .01) when compared with all glenoid bone loss scenarios. Intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability were good or excellent. A coracoid oriented in the congruent-arc manner can reconstitute a significantly greater glenoid bone defect than a coracoid oriented in the classic manner (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This image-based anatomic study found that the ROC of the coracoid undersurface matches the ROC of the intact anterior glenoid articular margin. In conditions with anterior glenoid bony deficiency, the radii of curvature differ significantly at the graft-native glenoid interface; however, the coracoid graft placed in the congruent-arc manner reconstitutes the ROC of the missing anterior glenoid rim. In addition, orienting the coracoid in the congruent-arc manner can reconstitute a greater glenoid bone defect than a coracoid placed in the original manner as described by Latarjet. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The congruent-arc Latarjet procedure, a modification of the original procedure, is truly congruent in relation to the intact anterior glenoid rim. In addition, the congruent-arc modification can reconstitute a greater glenoid bone defect when compared with the original Latarjet procedure.