Intravenous push antibiotics in the emergency department: Education and implementation.

PURPOSE: Intravenous push antibiotics can serve as an alternative to intravenous piggyback antibiotics while providing the same pharmacodynamics and adverse effect profile, easing shortage pressures and decreasing order to administration time, as well as representing a potential cost savings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intravenous push antibiotics could decrease the time from an order to the start of administration compared to piggyback antibiotics in emergency departments. This study also measured the cost savings of antibiotic preparation and administration and assessed nursing satisfaction when using intravenous push antibiotics. METHODS: Sample instances of use of intravenous push and piggyback antibiotics were identified. Patients were included if they were 18 years of age or older and received at least a single dose of intravenous push or piggyback ceftriaxone, cefepime, cefazolin, or meropenem in one of the institution's emergency departments. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the time from the order to the start of administration of intravenous push vs piggyback antibiotics. The secondary outcome was to compare the cost of antibiotic preparation for the 2 methods. RESULTS: The intravenous push and piggyback groups each had 43 patients. The time from the order to the start of administration decreased from 74 (interquartile range, 29-114) minutes in the piggyback group to 31 (interquartile range, 21-52) minutes in the push group (P = 0.003). When the estimated monthly cost savings for ceftriaxone, cefepime, and meropenem were added together, across the emergency departments, an estimated $227,930.88 is saved per year when using intravenous push antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Intravenous push antibiotics decrease the time from ordering to the start of administration and result in significant cost savings.

Defining standard and high dosages for ß-lactam agents administered by intermittent, prolonged or continuous infusion: a PK/PD simulation study.

BACKGROUND: The new definitions of antimicrobial susceptibility categories proposed by EUCAST in 2020 require the definition of standard and high dosages of antibiotic. For injectable ß-lactams, standard and high dosages have been proposed for short-infusion regimens only. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate dosages for ß-lactams administered by prolonged infusion (PI) and continuous infusion (CI). METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations were performed for seven injectable ß-lactams: aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, piperacillin and temocillin. Various dosage regimens based on short infusion, PI or CI were simulated in virtual patients. Pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PTAs were obtained based on reference population PK models, as well as PK/pharmacodynamic targets and MIC breakpoints proposed by EUCAST. Alternative dosage regimens associated with PTA values similar to those of recommended dosages up to the breakpoints were considered acceptable. RESULTS: Adequate PTAs were confirmed for most EUCAST short-infusion dosage regimens. A total of 9 standard and 14 high dosages based on PI (3 to 4 h) or CI were identified as alternatives. For cefepime and aztreonam, only PI and CI regimens could achieve acceptable PTAs for infections caused by Pseudomonas spp.: 2 g q8h as PI of 4 h or 6 g/24 h CI for cefepime; 2 g q6h as PI of 3 h or 6 g/24 h CI for aztreonam. CONCLUSIONS: These alternative standard and high dosage regimens are expected to provide antibiotic exposure compatible with new EUCAST definitions of susceptibility categories and associated MIC breakpoints. However, further clinical evaluation is necessary.

Population pharmacokinetic model of cefepime for critically ill adults: a comparative assessment of eGFR equations.

Cefepime exhibits highly variable pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to develop and qualify a population pharmacokinetic model for use in the critically ill and investigate the impact of various estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations using creatinine, cystatin C, or both on model parameters. This was a prospective study of critically ill adults hospitalized at an academic medical center treated with intravenous cefepime. Individuals with acute kidney injury or on kidney replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded. A nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic model was developed using data collected from 2018 to 2022. The 120 included individuals contributed 379 serum samples for analysis. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination best described the data. The population mean parameters (standard error) in the final model were 7.84 (0.24) L/h for CL1 and 15.6 (1.45) L for V1. Q was fixed at 7.09 L/h and V2 was fixed at 10.6 L, due to low observed interindividual variation in these parameters. The final model included weight as a covariate for volume of distribution and the eGFRcr-cysC (mL/min) as a predictor of drug clearance. In summary, a population pharmacokinetic model for cefepime was created for critically ill adults. The study demonstrated the importance of cystatin C to prediction of cefepime clearance. Cefepime dosing models which use an eGFR equation inclusive of cystatin C are likely to exhibit improved accuracy and precision compared to dosing models which incorporate an eGFR equation with only creatinine.

Activity fingerprinting of AMR ß-lactamase towards a fast and accurate diagnosis.

Antibiotic resistance has become a serious threat to global public health and economic development. Rapid and accurate identification of a patient status for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are urgently needed in clinical diagnosis. Here we describe the development of an assay method for activity fingerprinting of AMR ß-lactamases using panels of 7 ß-lactam antibiotics in 35 min. New Deli Metallo ß-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) and penicillinase were demonstrated as two different classes of ß-lactamases. The panel consisted of three classes of antibiotics, including: penicillins (penicillin G, piperacillin), cephalosporins (cefepime, ceftriaxone, cefazolin) and carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem). The assay employed a scheme combines the catalytic reaction of AMR ß-lactamases on antibiotic substrates with a flow-injected thermometric biosensor that allows the direct detection of the heat generated from the enzymatic catalysis, and eliminates the need for custom substrates and multiple detection schemes. In order to differentiate classes of ß-lactamases, characterization of the enzyme activity under different catalytic condition, such as, buffer composition, ion strength and pH were investigated. This assay could provide a tool for fast diagnosis of patient AMR status which makes possible for the future accurate treatment with selected antibiotics.

Retrospective Observational Assessment of the Impact of Cefepime Prophylaxis in Neutropenic Pediatric Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The potential for cefepime prophylaxis to reduce bloodstream infections (BSIs) in pediatric patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) has been incompletely characterized. METHODS: A retrospective quasi-experimental study of patients under 21 years of age admitted with AML from 2010 through 2018 at two affiliated pediatric tertiary-care hospitals before and after the adoption of routine cefepime prophylaxis for afebrile AML patients during profound neutropenia. RESULTS: The rate of BSIs per 1000 neutropenia days was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group than the baseline group (2.6 vs 15.5, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.32). Interrupted time-series analysis showed that a sharp reduction in BSIs coincided with the implementation of prophylaxis. Bacteremia with viridans group streptococci was frequent in the baseline group but not observed after adopting prophylaxis. Despite the increased use of cefepime, the rate of cefepime-nonsusceptible BSIs per 1000 neutropenia days decreased (1.6 vs 4.1, IRR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-0.99). The median number of febrile neutropenia episodes per patient also decreased in the prophylaxis group, as did the proportion of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (22/51 (43.1%) vs 26/38 (68.4%); risk difference -25.3%, 95% CI -44.4 to -2.8). A trend was observed toward an increased proportion of patients with Clostridioides difficile infection in the prophylaxis group (10/51 (19.6%) vs 3/38 (7.9%); risk difference 11.7%, 95% CI -3.4 to 29.0). CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in BSIs, febrile neutropenia, and ICU admission among pediatric AML patients.

Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics, Antibacterial Target Attainment, and Estimated Probability of Neurotoxicity in Critically Ill Patients.

Cefepime has been reported to cause concentration-related neurotoxicity, especially in critically ill patients with renal failure. This evaluation aimed to identify a dosing regimen providing a sufficient probability of target attainment (PTA) and the lowest justifiable risk of neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on plasma concentrations over four consecutive days obtained from 14 intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The patients received a median dose of 2,000 mg cefepime by 30-min intravenous infusions with dosing intervals of every 8 h (q8h) to q24h. A time that the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC over the dosing interval (fT>MIC) of 65% and an fT>2×MIC of 100% were defined as treatment targets. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to identify a dosing regimen for a PTA of 90% and a probability of neurotoxicity not exceeding 20%. A two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data. Estimated creatinine clearance was significantly related to the clearance of cefepime in nondialysis patients. Interoccasion variability on clearance improved the model, reflecting dynamic clearance changes. The evaluations suggested combining thrice-daily administration as an appropriate choice. In patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance, 120 mL/min), for the pharmacodynamics target of 100% fT>2×MIC and a PTA of 90%, a dose of 1,333 mg q8h was found to be related to a probability of neurotoxicity of ≤20% and to cover MICs up to 2 mg/L. Continuous infusion appears to be superior to other dosing regimens by providing higher efficacy and a low risk of neurotoxicity. The model makes it possible to improve the predicted balance between cefepime efficacy and neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01793012).

Pharmacokinetics of YK-1169 in healthy subjects and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis by Monte Carlo simulation.

OBJECTIVE: This study (NCT05588531) aimed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of cefepime-avibactam (YK-1169) in healthy Chinese subjects and explore the optimal regimen for treating carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) based on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation. METHODS: YK-1169 single-ascending doses (0.5, 1.25, 2.5 or 3.75 g, 2-h infusion) and multiple doses (2.5 or 3.75 g every 8 h [q8h], 2-h infusion) given for 7 days were evaluated in pharmacokinetic studies. Subjects were randomized to receive cefepime (2 g), avibactam (0.5 g) or YK-1169 (2.5 g) to assess drug-drug interactions. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of YK-1169 were determined by the broth microdilution method. Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate 10 different dose regimens. RESULTS: Cefepime and avibactam both showed a linear pharmacokinetic profile. No accumulation was found after multiple doses. The cefepime Cmax,ss and AUC0-∞,ss were 9.20 and 16.0 µg/mL, 407.2 and 659.45 µg·h/mL in the 2.5 and 3.75 g multiple-dose groups, respectively. The avibactam Cmax,ss and AUC0-∞,ss were 0.545 and 0.837 µg/mL, 53.31 and 79.55 µg·h/mL in the 2.5 and 3.75 g multiple-dose groups, respectively. Cefepime and avibactam did not affect each other's pharmacokinetics. No serious adverse events occurred. All regimens achieved 90% probability of target attainment (PTA) goals when the MIC was ≤8 mg/L. The regimens of 2.5 (q8h, 2-h infusion), 3.75 (q8h, 2-, 3- and 4-h infusions) and 7.5 g (24-h continuous infusion) reached a 90% cumulative fraction of response. CONCLUSION: YK-1169 had good antibacterial activity against CRKP and could be an option for CRKP infections. The regimen of 2.5 g q8h intravenously guttae (ivgtt) 2 h should be considered in future clinical trials.

Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analyses to identify a rational empirical dosing strategy for cefepime in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify rational empirical dosing strategies for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients by utilizing population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective and opportunistic pharmacokinetic (PK) study was conducted in 130 critically ill patients in two ICU sites. The plasma concentrations of cefepime were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. All cefepime PK data were analysed simultaneously using the non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the PTA of cefepime at different MIC values following different dose regimens in subjects with different renal functions. RESULTS: The PK of cefepime in critically ill patients was best characterized by a two-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Creatinine clearance and body weight were identified to be significant covariates. Our simulation results showed that prolonged 3 h infusion does not provide significant improvement on target attainment compared with the traditional intermittent 0.5 h infusion. In contrast, for a given daily dose continuous infusion provided much higher breakpoint coverage than either 0.5 h or 3 h intermittent infusions. To balance the target attainment and potential neurotoxicity, cefepime 3 g/day continuous infusion appears to be a better dosing regimen than 6 g/day continuous infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion may represent a promising strategy for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific cefepime susceptibility patterns as well as individual patients' renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions.

Cefepime, not Piperacillin/Tazobactam use, for empirical treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter spp.: Results from a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of published data to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens against bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella aerogenes (BSIs-Kae) and Enterobacter cloacae complex (BSIs-Ecc) in patients with various degrees of renal function. METHODS: Pathogens were isolated from China's blood bacterial resistant investigation network. The dosing regimens of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin were simulated with intermittent infusion and extended infusion. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to calculate the probability of target attainment and a cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against BSIs-Kae/Ecc. RESULTS: In total, 203 BSIs-Kae, and 785 BSIs-Ecc were isolated from the surveillance network. Imipenem showed the highest in vitro activity against BSIs-Kae/Ecc, followed by cefepime (85%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (70-80%). The MIC90 values of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam aginst BSIs-Kae and BSIs-Ecc were 1/1 mg/L, 16/16 mg/L, and 64/128 mg/L, respectively. The simulation results showed imipenem achieved the highest CFRs in patients with normal or decreased renal function, with values of 91-99%, followed by FEP (88-96%), without risk of excessive dosing. However, the intermittent and extended dosing regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam were unlikely to provide adequate exposure for empirical management of BSIs-Kae/Ecc (CFRs, 50-80%), regardless of renal function. Besides, the traditional intermittent piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens were highly likely to contribute to suboptimal therapeutic exposure when MIC was close to clinical breakpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime, not piperacillin/tazobactam, can be a reasonable carbapenem-sparing option in empirically treating BSIs-Kae/Ecc.

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an assessment of frequency of isolation from ICU versus non-ICU, phenotypic and genotypic profiles in a multinational population of hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Historically, multi-drug resistant organisms have been associated with the ICU setting. The present study sought to define the frequency of isolation from ICU versus non-ICU, phenotypic and genotypic profiles of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) from a global cohort. METHODS: Multicenter surveillance study (17 centers from 12 countries) including 672 CR-PA isolates from 2019 to 2021. Phenotypic carbapenemase testing was assessed. Genotypic carbapenemase testing was conducted (CarbaR and CarbaR NxG) to detect ß-lactamases. Broth microdilution MICs were established for ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and ceftazidime/avibactam. RESULTS: 59% of CR-PA were isolated from patients outside the ICU. The most common source in ICU and non-ICU patients was respiratory (55% and 30%, respectively). In the ICU, 35% of isolates were phenotypically carbapenemase-positive versus 29% for non-ICU. VIM was the most common carbapenemase (54% and 44%, respectively) followed by GES (27% and 28%, respectively). Susceptibility to ceftazidime or cefepime were relatively low in ICU (39% and 41% of isolates, respectively) and non-ICU (47% and 52% of isolates, respectively). Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam were more active with 56% and 66% of isolates susceptible in the ICU while 65% and 76% in non-ICU, respectively. When carbapenemase-negative, 86% and 88% of ICU isolates were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Similarly, in the carbapenemase-negative, non-ICU isolates 88% and 92% of isolates were susceptible, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although multidrug resistant pathogens are often regarded as a challenge in the ICU population, the majority of CR-PA were isolated from non-ICU patients. Implementing phenotypic/genotypic testing will assist in guiding treatment. Carbapenem-resistance in P. aeruginosa should be regarded as a surrogate for MDR and this phenotype is increasingly prevalent outside the ICU.

An optimal extended-infusion dosing of cefepime and ceftazidime in critically ill patients with continuous renal replacement therapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine optimal extended-infusion dosing regimens for cefepime and ceftazidime in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy using Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pharmacokinetic models were built using published pharmacokinetic/demographic data to predict drug disposition in 5000 virtual critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) with the standard (20-30 mL/kg/h) and a higher (40 mL/kg/h) effluent rates. MCS was performed to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) of four cefepime and ceftazidime doses administered over 4-h with the target of ≥60% fT > 4×MIC. The lowest dose attaining PTA ≥90% during the first 48-h was considered optimal. Additionally, risk of drug toxicity was assessed at 48-h using suggested neurotoxicity thresholds. RESULTS: Cefepime 2 g loading dose (LD), then extended-infusion of 2 g q8hr was optimal in CVVH at 20 mL/kg/h and the same ceftazidime dose was optimal in CVVH at 20-30 mL/kg/h. Higher cefepime and ceftazidime doses were required to be optimal at higher effluent rates. This optimal dose particularly for cefepime likely increases neurotoxicity risk in most virtual patients with all CVVH settings. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime and ceftazidime 2 g LD, followed by extended-infusion 2 g q8hr may be optimal in CVVH with standard effluent rates.

Prospective assessment of breakthrough infections and neurotoxicity and their association with cefepime trough concentrations in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Cefepime is a first-line antibiotic for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) in haematological cancer patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of cefepime is frequently advocated. However, it remains unclear what range of concentrations should be targeted for maximal efficacy and minimal toxicity. Therefore, we examined the relationship between cefepime exposure and clinical efficacy or neurotoxicity in FN patients. This prospective, observational, single-centre study included all adult hospitalised patients presenting with FN at the haematology ward and treated with cefepime from August 2019 until October 2020. Primary outcomes were incidence of breakthrough infection and neurotoxicity and their relationship with free cefepime serum trough concentrations. A total of 76 patients were included, contributing 96 cefepime treatment courses. The median (interquartile range) estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (eGFRCKD-EPI) and free cefepime trough concentration were 101 (85-112) mL/min/1.73m2 and 8.6 (4.9-16.2) mg/L, respectively. Interpatient and intrapatient variability in cefepime trough concentrations was largely explained by renal function. No cefepime-related breakthrough infections occurred during cefepime treatment. Neurotoxicity, probably induced by cefepime administration, occurred during 6/96 (6.3%) treatment courses. Patients with neurotoxicity showed a significant trend for higher trough concentrations (median 15.4 mg/L vs. 8.6 mg/L; P < 0.001). This study provides real-world clinical data showing that high cefepime dosage is efficacious and safe in FN patients. Routine TDM does not appear to be needed in FN patients with preserved renal function. However, TDM might be reserved for FN patients at high risk of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity or when intended to cover pathogens with a minimum inhibitory concentration >1 mg/L.

Assessment of Activity and Resistance Mechanisms to Cefepime in Combination with the Novel ß-Lactamase Inhibitors Zidebactam, Taniborbactam, and Enmetazobactam against a Multicenter Collection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales.

The global distribution of carbapenemases such as KPC, OXA-48, and metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) gives cause for concern, as these enzymes are not inhibited by classical ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs). The current development of new inhibitors is one of the most promising highlights for the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria. The activity of cefepime in combination with the novel BLIs zidebactam, taniborbactam, and enmetazobactam was studied in a collection of 400 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE). The genomes were fully sequenced and potential mechanisms of resistance to cefepime/BLI combinations were characterized. Cefepime resistance in the whole set of isolates was 79.5% (MIC50/90 64/≥128mg/L). The cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam combinations showed the highest activity (MIC50/90 ≤0.5/1 and ≤0.5/2 mg/L, respectively). Cefepime/zidebactam displayed high activity, regardless of the carbapenemase or extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) considered (99% of isolates displayed MIC ≤2 mg/L). Cefepime/taniborbactam displayed excellent activity against OXA-48- and KPC-producing Enterobacterales and lower activity against MBL-producing isolates (four strains yielded MICs ≥16 mg/L: 2 NDM producers with an insertion in PBP3, one VIM-1 producer with nonfunctional OmpK35, and one IMP-8 producer). Cefepime/enmetazobactam displayed the lowest activity (MIC50/90 1/≥128 mg/L), with MICs ≥16 mg/L for 49 MBL producers, 40 OXA-48 producers (13 with amino acid changes in OmpK35/36, 4 in PBPs and 11 in RamR) and 25 KPC producers (most with an insertion in OmpK36). These results confirm the therapeutic potential of the new ß-lactamase inhibitors, shedding light on the activity of cefepime and BLIs against CPE and resistance mechanisms. The cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam combinations are particularly highlighted as promising alternatives to penicillin-based inhibitors for the treatment of CPE.

Time Above All Else: Pharmacodynamic Analysis of ß-Lactams in Critically Ill Patients.

ß-Lactams are the most commonly used antibiotics in intensive care units (ICUs). As critically ill patients often experience pharmacokinetic aberrations, and rates of antimicrobial resistance vary between hospital settings, reliance on tertiary sources or package labeling to guide empiric dosing often results in suboptimal ß-lactam exposure. The primary objective was to identify ß-lactam regimens capable of achieving ≥90% cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against 7 Gram-negative pathogens within 4 ICUs at our institution. Unit-specific minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution data was used in combination with published pharmacokinetic parameters in critically ill patients to perform Monte Carlo simulations. The percentage of time for which the unbound concentration of antibiotic remained above the MIC (%ƒT > MIC) was used as the pharmacodynamic target: 70%ƒT >MIC for cefepime, 40%ƒT > MIC for meropenem, and 50%ƒT > MIC for piperacillin/tazobactam. Regimens were modeled to determine the likelihood of achieving ≥90% CFR. Overall, intermittently dosed cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam failed to achieve ≥90% CFR for every organism. Cefepime 2 g intermittent bolus every 8 hours failed to achieve ≥90% CFR for Klebsiella pneumoniae or Enterobacter cloacae despite susceptibility rates exceeding 90%. Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g prolonged infusion (PI) every 6 hours achieved <85% CFR for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and <50% CFR for Acinetobacter baumannii in every ICU. Meropenem 2 g PI every 8 hours and meropenem 2 g PI every 6 hours were the only regimens capable of achieving ≥90% CFR for P aeruginosa in all units. Use of Monte Carlo simulations, with incorporation of local MIC distribution data, provides a mechanism to effectively predict optimal agent and dose selection within specific hospital systems, thereby enhancing pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic optimization and improving clinical efficacy.

Assessment of cefepime toxicodynamics: comprehensive examination of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for cefepime-induced neurotoxicity and evaluation of current dosing guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) is an increasingly reported adverse event; however, the toxicity threshold remains unclear. This study was conducted to provide a comprehensive examination of the most appropriate threshold for CIN, and evaluate the ability of current dosing regimens to attain therapeutic targets. METHODS: Data of the incidence of CIN and cefepime plasma concentrations were collected retrospectively from patients administered cefepime. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was used to determine daily cefepime trough concentration (Cmin), maximum serum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve. The ability of each pharmacokinetic parameter to predict CIN was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, from which optimal toxicity thresholds were determined. Pharmacokinetic simulation was used to evaluate the ability of cefepime dosing guidelines to meet established efficacy targets, whilst maintaining exposure below the determined CIN threshold. RESULTS: In total, 102 cefepime courses were evaluated, with CIN reported in 10. ROC analyses showed that all cefepime pharmacokinetic parameters were strongly predictive of CIN. Cmin of 49 mg/L was identified as the optimal toxicity target, based on its predictive ability (0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.758-0.999, P<0.001) and ease of clinical use. Assessment of cefepime dosing regimens predicted that only 29% of simulated patients achieve therapeutic targets, with patients with impaired renal function more likely to exhibit subtherapeutic concentrations (89%), and patients with normal renal function likely to have potentially toxic exposure (64%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study provide evidence that cefepime exposure is highly predictive of CIN, with Cmin of 49 mg/L being the most appropriate toxicity threshold. Further research is required to optimize cefepime dosing in the context of this therapeutic target.

Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment in Critically Ill Patients on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Sepsis causes half of acute kidney injuries in the intensive care unit (ICU). ICU patients may need continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which will affect their antimicrobial exposure. We aimed to build a cefepime population pharmacokinetic (PK) model in CRRT ICU patients and perform simulations to assess target attainment. Patients who were ≥18 years old, were admitted to the ICU, and received cefepime 2 g every 8 h as a 4-h infusion while on CRRT were enrolled prospectively. Samples were collected from the predialyzer ports, postdialyzer ports, and effluent fluid at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 h after the first dose and at steady state. Age, sex, weight, urine output, and CRRT parameters were recorded. Pmetrics was used for population PK and simulations. The target exposure was 100% of the dosing interval during which the free beta-lactam concentration is above the MIC (fT>MIC). Ten patients were included; their mean age was 53 years, and mean weight was 119 kg. Seventy percent were males. Cefepime was described by a five-compartment model. The downtime was applied to the CRRT flow rates, which were used to describe the rates of transfer between the compartments. At MICs of ≤8 mg/liter, intermittent infusion of 2 g cefepime every 8 h achieved good target attainment both early in therapy and at steady state. Only extended- and continuous-infusion regimens achieved good target attainment at MICs of 16 mg/liter. In conclusion, 2 g cefepime infused over 30 min followed by extended infusion of 2 g every 8 h achieved good target attainment at MICs of ≤16 mg/liter with different CRRT flow rates and may be considered in resistant bacterial infections.

Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Cefepime and Enmetazobactam in Healthy Volunteers: Towards New Treatments for Nosocomial Pneumonia.

Cefepime-enmetazobactam is a novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against a range of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae This agent is being developed for a range of serious hospital infections. An understanding of the extent of partitioning of ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations into the human lung is required to better understand the potential role of cefepime-enmetazobactam for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. A total of 20 healthy volunteers were used to study the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of a regimen of 2 g cefepime-1 g enmetazobactam every 8 h intravenously (2 g/1 g q8h i.v.). Each volunteer contributed multiple plasma samples and a single epithelial lining fluid (ELF) sample, obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage. Concentrations of cefepime and enmetazobactam were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic data were modeled using a population methodology, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess the attainment of pharmacodynamic targets defined in preclinical models. The concentration-time profiles of both agents in plasma and ELF were similar. The mean ± standard deviation percentage of partitioning of total drug concentrations of cefepime and enmetazobactam between plasma and ELF was 60.59% ± 28.62% and 53.03% ± 21.05%, respectively. Using pharmacodynamic targets for cefepime of greater than the MIC and free enmetazobactam concentrations of >2 mg/liter in ELF of 20% of the dosing interval, a regimen of cefepime-enmetazobactam of 2 g/0.5 g q8h i.v. infused over 2 h resulted in a probability of target attainment of ≥90% for Enterobacteriaceae with cefepime-enmetazobactam MICs of ≤8 mg/liter. This result provides a rationale to further consider cefepime-enmetazobactam for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

What is the optimal loading dose of broad-spectrum ß-lactam antibiotics in septic patients? Results from pharmacokinetic simulation modelling.

Optimal loading doses of ß-lactams to rapidly achieve adequate drug concentrations in critically ill patients are unknown. This was a post-hoc analysis of a prospective study that evaluated broad-spectrum ß-lactams [piperacillin (PIP), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP) and meropenem (MEM)] pharmacokinetics (PKs) in patients with sepsis or septic shock (n = 88). Monte Carlo simulation was performed for 1000 virtual patients using specific sets of covariates for various dosing regimens and different durations of administration. Pharmacodynamic (PD) targets were considered as drug concentrations exceeding at least 50% of time above four times the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>4 × MIC) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, according to EUCAST criteria, for PIP, 70%T>4 × MIC for CAZ and FEP and 40%T>4 × MIC for MEM. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was derived by calculating the percentage of patients who attained the PK/PD target at each MIC. The optimal loading dose was defined as the one associated with a ≥90% probability to achieve the PD targets. Our simulation model identified an optimal loading dose for PIP of 8 g given as a 3-h infusion (PTA of 96.2%), for CAZ and FEP of 4 g given as a 3-h infusion (PTA of 96.5% and 98.4%, respectively), and for MEM of 2 g given as a 30-min infusion (PTA of 93.4%), with the following antibiotic dose administered 6 h thereafter regardless of the drug. A higher first dose of broad-spectrum ß-lactams should be given to adequately treat less-susceptible pathogens in septic patients. These findings need to be validated in a prospective study.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients and Guidance for Initial Dosing.

Cefepime is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to treat bacterial infections. The time during which the free cefepime concentration is above the MIC (fT>MIC) should be optimized to increase the efficacy of the regimen. We aim to optimize the exposure of cefepime in ICU patients by using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and simulations. Two data sets were included in this study. The first was a prospective study of pediatric patients who received cefepime at 50 mg/kg of body weight and had extensive PK sampling. The second study comprised retrospective data for adult ICU patients admitted to UF Health Shands Hospital who received cefepime and had their cefepime concentrations measured. The population PK model was developed, and simulations were performed, using Pmetrics. The target exposures were 100% fT>MIC and 100% fT>4×MIC The studies included a total of 266 patients, and the mean ages were 3.9 years in the pediatric group and 55 years in adult group. More than half of the patients were males. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) creatinine clearance (CrCl) was 125 (93) ml/min. The mean (SD) daily dose for adults was 4.9 (1.6) g. Cefepime was well described by a two-compartment model with weight as a covariate on the volume of distribution and elimination rate constant (kel), and CrCl and age group as covariates on kel At a MIC of 8 mg/liter, a cefepime loading dose of 4 g as an extended infusion followed by a 6-g continuous infusion was needed for good target attainment. In conclusion, prolonged or continuous infusions will be needed to achieve optimal cefepime exposure for ICU patients. Given the observed variability, therapeutic drug monitoring can help individualize therapy.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 17 de julho de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on July 17, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referentes ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 14 artigos e 13 protocolos.