Microbiota Assessment of Pediatric Simple and Complex Acute Appendicitis.

Background and Objectives. The aim of this study is to determine the prevailing microbiota in samples from pediatric patients with acute appendicitis, as well as evaluate the antibacterial sensitivity of the isolated microorganisms, comparing the data obtained with the clinic's antibacterial therapy guidelines. Materials and Methods. The study group consisted of 93 patients between the ages of 7 and 18. All patients underwent a laparoscopic or conventional appendectomy. The children were hospitalized with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis. Microbiological cultures from the appendix and abdominal cavity were collected intraoperatively. Results. E. coli was identified in most cases irrespective of the clinical presentation of acute appendicitis. Most strains were susceptible to ampicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Five strains of E. coli produced extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) was the second most commonly isolated causative agent. Furthermore, it was common in cases of acute complex appendicitis. Most strains of P. aeruginosa were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ertapenem, ampicillin and cefotaxime, yet were susceptible to ceftazidime. Regardless of the clinical presentation, the samples yielded mixed isolates. Conclusion. E. coli is the main causative agent of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population displaying susceptibility to various antibiotics. P. aeruginosa was more prevalent in cases of acute complex appendicitis. P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime; however, they were resistant to cefotaxime, which should, therefore, be removed from guidelines for empirical antibacterial treatment of acute appendicitis due to phenotypic resistance of P. aeruginosa. We recommend antibiotics with distinct implementation to avoid antibiotic resistance.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Temocillin Treatment in Patients with Febrile UTI Accounting for the Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance has been listed as one of the biggest threats to global health today. A recent study has shown that treating febrile urinary tract infections with temocillin instead of cefotaxime leads to a reduced selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. However, a potential challenge with prioritizing temocillin over cefotaxime is the cost consequences. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of using temocillin compared to cefotaxime in treating febrile urinary tract infections in a model that takes the emergence of antibiotic resistance into account. METHODS: We used a Markov cohort model to estimate the costs and health effects of temocillin and cefotaxime treatment in febrile urinary tract infections in a Swedish setting. Health effects were assessed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years, and the primary outcome was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained with temocillin compared to cefotaxime. We used a 5-year time horizon. RESULTS: The model results showed that temocillin treatment led to better health outcomes at a higher total cost. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was approximately 38,400 EUR. Results from the sensitivity analysis suggested a 63% probability of temocillin being cost effective at a threshold of 50,000 EUR. Furthermore, results showed that the cost effectiveness of temocillin in febrile urinary tract infections is highly dependent on the drug cost. CONCLUSIONS: As antibiotic consumption is a driving force of resistance, it is essential to consider the development of resistance when studying the health economic consequences of antibiotic treatments. In doing so, this study found temocillin to be cost effective for febrile urinary tract infections.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Cefotaxime and Dosage Recommendations in Children with Sickle Cell Disease.

The pharmacokinetic profile of most drugs is dependent on the patient's covariates and may be influenced by the disease. Cefotaxime is frequently prescribed in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), characterized by vaso-occlusive complications, chronic hemolytic anemia, and a defective immunological function predisposing the individual to severe infection. Data on the impact of the disease on the disposition of cefotaxime are missing. In the present study, our aims were to determine cefotaxime pharmacokinetics when prescribed to children with SCD for suspected or proven bacterial infection, identify significant covariates, and perform Monte Carlo simulations to optimize the drug dosage. Cefotaxime serum concentrations were measured in 78 pediatric SCD patients receiving cefotaxime intravenously at a daily dose of 200 mg/kg of body weight in three or four divided doses over 30 min. A total of 107 concentrations were available for pharmacokinetic analysis. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with NONMEM software and used for Monte Carlo simulations. Cefotaxime concentrations ranged from 0.05 to 103.7 mg/liter. Cefotaxime pharmacokinetics were best described by a one-compartment model: the median estimated weight-normalized volume of distribution and clearance were 0.42 liter/kg (range, 0.2 to 1.1 liter/kg) and 0.38 liter/h/kg (range, 0.1 to 1.2 liter/h/kg). Cefotaxime clearance increased by 22% in patients with acute chest syndrome. Dosing optimization, performed using EUCAST MIC susceptibility breakpoints, showed that a dose of 100 mg/kg/6 h should be used, depending on the patient's characteristics and clinical presentation, in order to reach a value of the percentage of time that the drug concentration exceeded the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions of 80% in 80% of the patients when targeting sensitive Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli with MICs of 1 mg/liter or below.

Efectividad y seguridad de cefotaxima como primera línea para el tratamiento intrahospitalario de neumonía asociada a la comunidad no complicada por Streptococcus pneumoniae resistente en niños / Effectiveness and safety of cefotaxime as the first line for the in-hospital treatment of community-associated pneumonia not complicated by resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in children

Antecedentes: La Neumonía Asociada a la Comunidad (NAC) es una enfermedad resultante de la inflamación del parénquima pulmonar generada por un agente infeccioso fuera del ambiente hospitalario (1). El cuadro clínico se caracteriza por tos, fiebre y signos de consolidación al examen físico, pero puede ser muy variable y mostrar otros síntomas locales como disnea, dolor torácico, expectoración, taquipnea, o generales como fiebre, escalofríos confusión y taquicardia. Cefotaxima es un antibiótico semisintético de amplio espectro, pertenece al grupo de las cefalosporinas de tercera generación. Está indicada para el tratamiento de infecciones de huesos y articulaciones; genitourinarias, del sistema nervioso central, del tracto respiratorio bajo; de la piel y tejidos blandos; ginecológicas, bacteriemia y septicemia; infecciones intraabdominales y profilaxis en intervenciones quirúrgicas con riesgo de contaminación e infección. Evaluación de efectividad y seguridad: Pregunta de evaluación: En niños (menores de 18 años) con neumonía asociada a la comunidad no complicada por Streptococcus pneumoniae resistente, ¿cuál es la efectividad y seguridad de cefotaxima como primera línea de tratamiento intrahospitalario comparada con ceftriaxona, en términos de curación clínica y microbiológica, recaída, mortalidad, estancia hospitalaria y eventos adversos? La pregunta de evaluación fue refinada y validada con base en: autorización de mercadeo de la tecnología para la indicación de interés (registro sanitario INVIMA), listado de medicamentos vitales no disponibles, cobertura de las tecnologías en el Plan Obligatorio de Salud (POS) (Acuerdo 029 de 2011), revisión de grupos terapéuticos (clasificación ATC: Anatomical, Therapeutic, Chemical classification system), recomendaciones de guías de práctica clínica actualizadas, disponibilidad de evidencia sobre efectividad y seguridad (reportes de evaluación de tecnologías y revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura), uso de las tecnologías (listas nacionales de recobro, estadísticas de prescripción, etc), estudios de carga de enfermedad y consulta con expertos temáticos (especialistas clínicos). No se identificaron otros comparadores relevantes para la evaluación. Población: Niños (menores de 18 años) con neumonía asociada a la comunidad no complicada por Streptococcus pneumoniae resistente. Tecnología de interés: Cefotaxima como primera línea de tratamiento intrahospitalario. Metodología: Búsqueda de literatura. Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda sistemática y exhaustiva, con el objetivo de identificar evidencia científica relevante en relación con la pregunta de evaluación. Todo el proceso se acogió a los estándares de calidad internacional utilizados en revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura (16). Las búsquedas fueron llevadas a cabo por personal entrenado. Búsqueda en bases de datos electrónicas: De acuerdo con el tipo de estudios definido en los criterios de elegibilidad, se seleccionaron las siguientes fuentes electrónicas de consulta: MEDLINE (plataforma Ovid), MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (plataforma Ovid), MEDLINE Daily Update (plataforma Ovid), EMBASE.com, The Cochrane Library (plataforma Wiley). Conclusiones: No se identificó evidencia sobre la efectividad y seguridad de la tecnología de interés y su comparador.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) related complications in surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection after surgery is generally low, but affects up to 33% of patients after certain types of surgery. Postoperative MRSA infection can occur as surgical site infections (SSIs), chest infections, or bloodstream infections (bacteraemia). The incidence of MRSA SSIs varies from 1% to 33% depending upon the type of surgery performed and the carrier status of the individuals concerned. The optimal prophylactic antibiotic regimen for the prevention of MRSA after surgery is not known. OBJECTIVES: To compare the benefits and harms of all methods of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative MRSA infection and related complications in people undergoing surgery. SEARCH METHODS: In March 2013 we searched the following databases: The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (The Cochrane Library); NHS Economic Evaluation Database (The Cochrane Library); Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared one antibiotic regimen used as prophylaxis for SSIs (and other postoperative infections) with another antibiotic regimen or with no antibiotic, and that reported the methicillin resistance status of the cultured organisms. We did not limit our search for RCTs by language, publication status, publication year, or sample size. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently identified the trials for inclusion in the review, and extracted data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for comparing binary outcomes between the groups and planned to calculated the mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for comparing continuous outcomes. We planned to perform meta-analysis using both a fixed-effect model and a random-effects model. We performed intention-to-treat analysis whenever possible. MAIN RESULTS: We included 12 RCTs, with 4704 participants, in this review. Eleven trials performed a total of 16 head-to-head comparisons of different prophylactic antibiotic regimens. Antibiotic prophylaxis was compared with no antibiotic prophylaxis in one trial. All the trials were at high risk of bias. With the exception of one trial in which all the participants were positive for nasal carriage of MRSA or had had previous MRSA infections, it does not appear that MRSA was tested or eradicated prior to surgery; nor does it appear that there was high prevalence of MRSA carrier status in the people undergoing surgery.There was no sufficient clinical similarity between the trials to perform a meta-analysis. The overall all-cause mortality in four trials that reported mortality was 14/1401 (1.0%) and there were no significant differences in mortality between the intervention and control groups in each of the individual comparisons. There were no antibiotic-related serious adverse events in any of the 561 people randomised to the seven different antibiotic regimens in four trials (three trials that reported mortality and one other trial). None of the trials reported quality of life, total length of hospital stay or the use of healthcare resources. Overall, 221/4032 (5.5%) people developed SSIs due to all organisms, and 46/4704 (1.0%) people developed SSIs due to MRSA.In the 15 comparisons that compared one antibiotic regimen with another, there were no significant differences in the proportion of people who developed SSIs. In the single trial that compared an antibiotic regimen with placebo, the proportion of people who developed SSIs was significantly lower in the group that received antibiotic prophylaxis with co-amoxiclav (or cefotaxime if allergic to penicillin) compared with placebo (all SSI: RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.65; MRSA SSI RR 0.05; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.83). In two trials that reported MRSA infections other than SSI, 19/478 (4.5%) people developed MRSA infections including SSI, chest infection and bacteraemia. There were no significant differences in the proportion of people who developed MRSA infections at any body site in these two comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with co-amoxiclav decreases the proportion of people developing MRSA infections compared with placebo in people without malignant disease undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion, although this may be due to decreasing overall infection thereby preventing wounds from becoming secondarily infected with MRSA. There is currently no other evidence to suggest that using a combination of multiple prophylactic antibiotics or administering prophylactic antibiotics for an increased duration is of benefit to people undergoing surgery in terms of reducing MRSA infections. Well designed RCTs assessing the clinical effectiveness of different antibiotic regimens are necessary on this topic.

[Comparative assessment of efficacy of the 3d generation cephalosporins, ceftriabol, and claforan, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia].

The aim of the study was to evaluate therapeutic efficiency of ceftriabol (Russia) and claforan (both 3d generation cefalosporins) used to manage severe extrahospital pneumonia. Ceftriabol (2 g) was administered one or twice daily, claforan intravenously (2 g b.i.d. or t.i.d). Results of the treatment were assessed from a combination of anamnestic and physical examination data, results of X-ray and laboratory studies. Normalization of major clinical, laboratory, and instrumental parameters in patients treated with ceftriabol and claforan was achieved roughly within the same time period. It means that ceftriabol is at least as efficacious as claforan when applied to the treatment of severe extrahospital pneumonia.

[Antibiotic therapy of severe community-acquired pneumonia].

Combined antibiotic therapy, including the use of intravenous cefotaxime (a beta-lactam) and azithromycin (a macrolide) was shown advantageous from both clinical and economic viewpoints in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of meropenem and cefotaxime for pediatric meningitis: a report from the OPTAMA program.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the probability of meropenem (Merrem, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P., Wilmington, DE, USA) and cefotaxime (Claforan, Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, USA) achieving bactericidal exposures in the cerebrospinal fluid against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influenzae. METHODS: A 5,000-patient Monte Carlo simulation in a population of 10-year-old children with meningitis was conducted. Pediatric pharmacokinetic data were derived from the literature. Pathogen minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were obtained from common bacteria that had caused meningitis collected during pediatric clinical trials. Time above the MIC exposures in the cerebrospinal fluid was calculated. Bactericidal exposure or probability of target attainment was defined as 40% and 50% time above the MIC for meropenem and cefotaxime, respectively. High cumulative fractions of responses were defined as >90% probability of target attainment against the populations of bacteria. RESULTS: Meropenem was calculated to achieve 94.7%, 94.3%, and 96.1% cumulative fractions of response against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and N. meningitidis, respectively. Cefotaxime only achieved a high likelihood of bactericidal attainment against N. meningitidis (91.6%). Against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, cefotaxime was only calculated to achieve 84.3% and 84.8% cumulative fractions of response, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a simulated population of 10-year-old children, meropenem had a high likelihood of attaining bactericidal exposures in the cerebrospinal fluid. Cefotaxime had a >90% cumulative fraction of response against only N. meningitidis. Therefore, at the doses simulated, meropenem may be a more appropriate empiric choice for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in pediatric patients presumed to be caused by these pathogens until culture and susceptibility data are available.

Monte Carlo simulation in the evaluation of susceptibility breakpoints: predicting the future: insights from the society of infectious diseases pharmacists.

Appropriate treatment with antimicrobials involves factors we cannot control. Factors such as interpatient variability in drug exposure, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting pathogen, and the patient's clinical status clearly affect the therapeutic response. Despite these uncertainties, we can estimate the probability of attaining a successful therapeutic outcome in the context of factors that are within our control. Chief among these are drug, dose, and the dosing interval. One way to predict the probability of a positive therapeutic outcome is through the use of an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic stochastic model. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses using Monte Carlo simulation to integrate interpatient variability in drug exposure, drug potency, and in vivo exposure targets predictive of positive therapeutic outcomes are influencing antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints at home and abroad. The consequences of this paradigm shift are far reaching, affecting the commercial concerns of drug and susceptibility testing device manufacturers, perceptions about antimicrobial resistance, and ultimately patient care decisions.

Using cost of infection as a tool to demonstrate a difference in prophylactic antibiotic efficacy: a prospective randomized comparison of the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that cost, as well as frequency of infection, could be used to demonstrate a difference in the performance of prophylactic antibiotics. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 1013 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were given 1 g of intravenous ceftriaxone (R) or cefotaxime (C) at induction of anesthesia, and an additional 500 mg of metronidazole for colorectal surgery. Infection was checked for during the hospital stay and at 30 days postoperatively. The inpatient, outpatient, and community costs of infection were prospectively collected. The frequency of wound infection for appendectomies when additional metronidazole was not administered was greater with cefotaxime (R 6%, C 18%, p < 0.05), but the cost of infection was the same (average cost R $994 +/- SD $1101, C $878 +/- $1318). For all other procedures, the frequency of wound infection was similar (R 8%, C 10%), but the cost was less with ceftriaxone (R $887 +/- $1743, C $2995 +/- $6592, p < 0.05). Ceftriaxone decreased the frequency but not the cost of chest and urinary infection (frequency R 6%, C 11%, p < 0.02, cost R $1273 +/- 2338, C $1615 +/- 4083). Differences in both the frequency and cost of all infection are also presented. Ceftriaxone decreased either the frequency or the cost of different postoperative infections. The cost of infection can increase the discriminatory power of trials comparing antibiotic effectiveness.

Impact of a web-based antimicrobial approval system on broad-spectrum cephalosporin use at a teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To achieve sustained improvement in use of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone (CEFX) in a major teaching hospital, as measured against national antibiotic guidelines. DESIGN AND SETTING: Pre- and post-intervention survey of CEFX use in the Royal Melbourne Hospital, a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Victoria. INTERVENTION: Web-based antimicrobial approval system linked to national antibiotic guidelines was developed by a multidisciplinary team and implemented in March 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in rate of CEFX use (defined daily doses [DDDs] per 1000 acute occupied bed days) over 8 months pre- and 15 months post-intervention; concordance of indication for CEFX with national antibiotic guidelines pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: CEFX use decreased from a mean of 38.3 DDDs/1000 bed days pre-intervention to 15.9, 18.7 and 21.2 DDDs/1000 bed days at 1, 4 and 15 months post-intervention. Concordance with national antibiotic guidelines rose from 25% of courses pre-intervention to 51% within 5 months post-intervention (P < 0.002). Gentamicin use also increased, from a mean of 30.0 to 48.3 DDDs/1000 bed days (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The web-based antimicrobial approval system achieved a sustained reduction in CEFX use over 15 months as well as increased prescribing concordance with antibiotic guidelines. It has potential for linking to electronic prescribing and for wider use for other drugs, as well as for research into the epidemiology of antibiotic use.

Burden of disease in hospitalized RSV-positive children in Germany.

BACKGROUND: In spite of a large amount of data from other countries, those on the burden of disease attributed to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Germany are lacking and are urgently needed. METHOD: In a population-based cross-sectional study from July 1996 to June 1999 150 children from birth to 16 years of age hospitalized in Kiel and tested positive for RSV by polymerase chain reaction were investigated. Stepwise linear and logistic regression models were applied to predict a bacterial co-infection as well as the duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: Pneumonia (54 %) and wheezing bronchitis (including bronchiolitis, 27 %) were the predominating diagnoses; 25 % had an underlying condition. Four patients needed nasal continuous airway pressure and one intermittent mandatory ventilation; none died. According to the surrogate markers CRP and immature neutrophil fraction, 20 % to 30 % were suspected to have a bacterial co-infection on admission; antibiotics were prescribed in 65 % of the patients. The average duration of hospitalization was 9 days and was best predicted by young age, the presence of an underlying condition, intercostal retractions and high CRP on admission. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial co-infection is the major confounder in burden of disease analyses in RSV. The decision not to administer antibiotics to children hospitalized with RSV can be risky, particularly when there is considerable diagnostic uncertainty. Within the realm of current clinical practice, complications and deaths related to RSV are rare in Germany.

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia]. / Estudio de costo-efectividad de ceftriaxona y cefotaxima en el tratamiento de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness ratio of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime to treat moderate to severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: A clinical trial was done in five hospitals of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, at the metropolitan area of Mexico City. Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime were compared to treat moderate to severe CAP, and the costs of purchasing, preparation, administration, hospitalization, and therapeutic success were quantified. Cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated, and sensitivity analysis and incremental analysis were done. RESULTS: The main isolated germs were Streptococcus pneumoniae (23.6%) and Staphylococcus aureus (18.5%). Most of the microorganisms were sensitive to ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefotaxime, and were resistant to penicillin, ampicillin, and erythromycin. Therapeutic success was 98% in the ceftriaxone group and 83% in the cefotaxime group (p = 0.0091). Cost-effectiveness ratio for per cent unit of success was $19,458.62 Mexican pesos in the ceftriaxone group and $29,218.08 in the cefotaxime group. Sensitivity analysis showed consistently a lower cost-effectiveness ratio in the ceftriaxone group. Incremental analysis based on the treatment of 55 patients showed that using ceftriaxone instead of cefotaxime resulted in saving $35,170.79 per each additional cured patient. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone has a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than cefotaxime to treat patients with CAP and bad prognosis criteria requiring hospitalization.

Estudio de costo-efectividad de ceftriaxona y cefataxima en el tratamiento de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad / Cost-effectiveness study of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime for the treatment of community acquired pneumonia

Objetivo. Determinar la relación costo-efectividad de ceftriaxona y cefotaxima en el tratamiento de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) de moderada a grave. Métodos. Se realizó un ensayo clínico en cinco hospitales del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social en el área metropolitana de la ciudad de México. Se comparó ceftriaxona con cefotaxima para el tratamiento de NAC, de moderada a grave, se evaluaron los costos de adquisición, preparación, aplicación, estancia hospitalaria y éxito terapéutico. Se calculó relación costo-efectividad, y se hicieron análisis de sensibilidad y análisis incremental. Resultados. Los principales gérmenes aislados fueron Streptococcus pneumoniae (23.6 por ciento) y Staphylococcus aureus (18.5 por ciento). La mayor parte de los microorganismos fueron sensibles a ceftriaxona, ceftazidima y cefotaxima, y resistentes a penicilina, ampicilina y eritromicina. El éxito terapéutico fue 98 por ciento en el grupo de ceftriaxona y 83 por ciento en el grupo de cefotaxima (p = 0.0091), la relación costo-efectividad por unidad porcentual de éxito fue $19,458.62 en el grupo de ceftriaxona y $29,218.08 en el grupo de cefotaxima. El análisis de sensibilidad mostró consistentemente menor relación costo-efectividad en el grupo de ceftriaxona. El análisis incremental basado en el tratamiento de 55 pacientes reveló que el uso de ceftriaxona en lugar de cefotaxima resulta en el ahorro de $35,170.79 por paciente adicional curado. Conclusiones. Ceftriaxona tiene menor relación costo-efectividad que cefotaxima en el tratamiento de NAC en pacientes con criterios de mal pronóstico que requieren hospitalización.

Sequential antimicrobial therapy: treatment of severe lower respiratory tract infections in children.

Although there have been a number of studies in adults, to date there has been little research into sequential antimicrobial therapy (SAT) in paediatric populations. The present study evaluates the impact of a SAT protocol for the treatment of severe lower respiratory tract infection in paediatric patients. The study involved 89 paediatric patients (44 control and 45 SAT). The SAT patients had a shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 versus 8.3 days), shorter duration of inpatient antimicrobial therapy (4.0 versus 7.9 days) with the period of iv therapy being reduced from a mean of 5.6 to 1.7 days. The total healthcare costs were reduced by 52%. The resolution of severe lower respiratory tract infection with a short course of iv antimicrobials, followed by conversion to oral therapy yielded clinical outcomes comparable to those achieved using longer term iv therapy. SAT proved to be an important cost-minimizing tool for realizing substantial healthcare costs savings.

Comparison of 5-day and 10-day cefixime in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

The focus of a multicenter trial conducted in Germany was to investigate whether a 5-day short course of cefixime 400 mg was equivalent to a 10-day standard therapy of cefixime 400 mg in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). In the 167 patients who were evaluated, on day 11 following treatment with once-daily oral cefixime resulted in clinical success in 91 and 89% of cases in the 5-day and 10-day treatment groups, respectively. At days 6, 11 and 30 after treatment there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 dose groups (p < 0.01). Bacteriological equivalence was also demonstrated. Gastrointestinal adverse events showed a tendency to occur less frequently in the 5-day group, but the difference was not significant. The results indicate that a short course therapy is equivalent in efficacy to the standard 10-day therapy in patients with AECB, and may thus offer cost advantages.

Cefixime for switch therapy.

Switch therapy, or step-down therapy, is the concept of switching from an intravenous antibiotic to an oral preparation after a few days, once the condition of the patient has improved and the pathogen and its susceptibility have been determined. The orally active third-generation cephalosporin cefixime is a primary candidate for switch therapy owing to its very good efficacy and safety profile. Preliminary studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes with switch therapy to cefixime after 2-3 days for a variety of serious infections. Importantly, dramatic cost benefits have also been found, particularly with respect to reduced length of hospital stays. However, guidelines are required to indicate under what conditions switch therapy is appropriate, and awareness must be developed within hospitals among physicians, pharmacists and administrators alike.

Cost-effectiveness of ceftriaxone in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adult hospital patients. A pharmaco-economic study based on a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of four intravenous antibiotic treatment regimens in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults in a private hospital setting. The study compared some third-generation cephalosporin regimens with a second-generation cephalosporin and an amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav) regimen to investigate published South African treatment guidelines from a pharmaco-economic point of view. METHOD: A pharmaco-economic model of local costs, from a payer perspective, was based on the results of a meta-analysis of clinical papers from peer-reviewed journals. The study compared intravenous (i.v.) ceftriaxone (2 g once daily), cefotaxime (i.v. 2 g 3 times a day), cefuroxime (i.v. 750 mg 3 times a day, followed by 500 mg orally 3 times a day) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (1.2 g intravenously 3 times a day, followed by 625 mg orally 3 times a day) [corrected]. RESULTS: An analysis of the odds ratios (ORs) of all two-way comparisons indicated that ceftriaxone ensured significantly higher probabilities of successful outcomes than the other antibiotic treatment regimens (ORs in the order of two were indicated). The pharmaco-economic results suggested that the ceftriaxone treatment regimen was the most cost-effective in the hospital treatment of CAP in adult patients. These results proved to be robust across sensitivity analyses for success rates and treatment days. A sensitivity analysis testing the assumption that patients could be discharged once the oral treatment was initiated indicated that the amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefuroxime treatment arms were more cost-effective. The clinical validity of such an assumption is questionable. CONCLUSION: Despite the conservative approach followed in terms of ceftriaxone data, both the clinical results and cost-effectiveness supported the use of ceftriaxone in the treatment of CAP in adults in the hospital setting.