Artificial intelligence in trauma systems.

Local trauma care and regional trauma systems are data-rich environments that are amenable to machine learning, artificial intelligence, and big-data analysis mechanisms to improve timely access to care, to measure outcomes, and to improve quality of care. Pilot work has been done to demonstrate that these methods are useful to predict patient flow at individual centers, so that staffing models can be adapted to match workflow. Artificial intelligence has also been proven useful in the development of regional trauma systems as a tool to determine the optimal location of a new trauma center based on trauma-patient geospatial injury data and to minimize response times across the trauma network. Although the utility of artificial intelligence is apparent and proven in small pilot studies, its operationalization across the broader trauma system and trauma surgery space has been slow because of cost, stakeholder buy-in, and lack of expertise or knowledge of its utility. Nevertheless, as new trauma centers or systems are developed, or existing centers are retooled, machine learning and sophisticated analytics are likely to be important components to help facilitate decision-making in a wide range of areas, from determining bedside nursing and provider ratios to determining where to locate new trauma centers or emergency medical services teams.

Trauma Care in India: Capacity Assessment Survey From Five Centers.

BACKGROUND: India is in the process of strengthening the trauma care system, and assessment of the current situation using standard guidelines has immense use. This study reports the status of trauma care facilities in India, with a broad framework of guidelines for essential trauma care by the World Health Organization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is part of a multicentric intervention study to standardize structured trauma care services in five Indian cities. Thirty trauma care facilities (five level I, 10 level II, and 15 level III facilities) were included. Data on the availability of equipment and manpower were collected. Availability of knowledge + skills and equipment + supplies was assessed based on the guidelines for essential trauma care by World Health Organization. RESULTS: There is almost 100% availability of services and equipment in level I hospitals, but availability varied between 50% and 100% at level II facilities. Very fewer number of services are available at level III facilities. Inadequacy of equipment is reported in level II and III facilities. Only level I facilities have required human resources. Availability of resources in terms of knowledge and equipment of different skills indicated that overall optimal level is observed in level I hospitals. Level II facilities are more deficient in nursing and paramedic staff, and level III facilities reported deficiencies in all categories. CONCLUSIONS: A significant imbalance between recommended resources and the resources that are available in the trauma care facilities was noted. Hence, the study warrants urgent strengthening of trauma care facilities, particularly of level II and III facilities.

The geriatric trauma patient: A neglected individual in a mature trauma system.

BACKGROUND: Those older than 65 years represent the fastest growing demographic in the United States. As such, their care has been emphasized by trauma entities such as the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Unfortunately, much of that focus has been of their care once they reach the hospital with little attention on the access of geriatric trauma patients to trauma centers (TCs). We sought to determine the rate of geriatric undertriage (UT) to TCs within a mature trauma system and hypothesized that there would be variation and clustering of the geriatric undertriage rate (UTR) within a mature trauma system because of the admission of geriatric trauma patient to nontrauma centers (NTCs). METHODS: From 2003 to 2015, all geriatric (age >65 years) admissions with an Injury Severity Score of greater than 9 from the Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation (PTSF) registry and those meeting trauma criteria (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision: 800-959) from the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) database were included. Undertriage rate was defined as patients not admitted to TCs (n = 27) divided by the total number of patients as from the PHC4 database. The PHC4 contains all inpatient admissions within Pennsylvania (PA), while PTSF reports admissions to PA TCs. The zip code of residence was used to aggregate calculations of UTR as well as other aggregate patient and census demographics, and UTR was categorized into lower, middle box, and upper quartiles. ArcGIS Desktop: Version 10.7, ESRI, Redlands, CA and GeoDa: Version 1.14.0, Open source license were used for geospatial mapping of UT with a spatial empirical Bayesian smoothed UTR, and Stata: Version 16.1, Stata Corp., College Station TX was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation had 58,336 cases, while PHC4 had 111,626 that met the inclusion criteria, resulting in a median (Q1-Q3) smoothed UTR of 50.5% (38.2-60.1%) across PA zip code tabulation areas. Geospatial mapping reveals significant clusters of UT regions with high UTR in some of the rural regions with limited access to a TC. The lowest quartile UTR regions tended to have higher population density relative to the middle or upper quartile UTR regions. At the patient level, the lowest UTR regions had more racial and ethnic diversity, a higher injury severity, and higher rates of treatment at a TC. Undertriage rate regions that were closer to NTCs had a higher odds of being in the upper UTR quartile; 4.48 (2.52-7.99) for NTC with less than 200 beds and 8.53 (4.70-15.47) for NTC with 200 beds or greater compared with zip code tabulation areas with a TC as the closest hospital. CONCLUSION: There are significant clusters of geriatric UT within a mature trauma system. Increased emphasis needs to focus prehospital on identifying the severely injured geriatric patient including specific geriatric triage protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, Level III.

Routine Repeat Head CT Does Not Change Management in Trauma Patients on Novel Anticoagulants.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines for imaging anticoagulated patients following a traumatic injury are unclear. Interval CT head (CTH) is often routinely performed after initial negative CTH to assess for delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH-d). The rate of ICH-d for patients taking novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is unknown. We hypothesized that the incidence of ICH-d in patients on NOACs would be similar, if not lower to that of warfarin, and routine repeat CTH after initial negative would not change management, and thus, may not be indicated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anticoagulated patients presenting with blunt trauma to a level I trauma center between 2016 and 2018 were evaluated. Exclusion criteria included: positive initial CTH and those taking nonoral anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents alone (without warfarin or NOAC). Outcomes included: ICH-d, discharge GCS, administration of reversal agents, neurosurgical intervention, readmission, and death. Multivariable regression was performed to evaluate patient factors associated with the development of ICH-d. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into a warfarin group (n = 191) and NOAC group (n = 141). The incidence of ICH-d in the warfarin group was 2.6% (5/191) and 2.1% (3/141) in the NOAC group (P = 0.77). There were no reversal agents administered, neurosurgical interventions, readmissions, or deaths in the NOAC group. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the impact of NOACs in the setting of trauma, especially regarding risks of ICH-d following traumatic injury. In the NOAC group, ICH-d occurred only 2.1% of the time. In addition, there were no reversal agents given, neurosurgical interventions, or deaths. These data, taken together, suggest the limited utility of repeat imaging in this patient population.

A novel protocol to maintain continuous access to thawed plasma at a rural trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Early administration of plasma improves mortality in massively transfused patients, but the thawing process causes delay. Small rural centers have been reluctant to maintain thawed plasma due to waste concerns. Our 254-bed rural Level II trauma center initiated a protocol allowing continuous access to thawed plasma, and we hypothesized its implementation would not increase waste or cost. METHODS: Two units of thawed plasma are continuously maintained in the trauma bay blood refrigerator. After 3 days, these units are replaced with freshly thawed plasma and returned to the blood bank for utilization prior to their 5-day expiration date. The blood bank monitors and rotates the plasma. Only trauma surgeons can use the plasma stored in the trauma bay. Wasted units and cost were measured over a 12-month period and compared with the previous 2 years. RESULTS: The blood bank thawed 1127 units of plasma during the study period assigning 274 to the trauma bay. When compared with previous years, we found a significant increase in waste (p < 0.001) and cost (p = 0.020) after implementing our protocol. It cost approximately US $125/month extra to maintain continuous access to thawed plasma during the study period. DISCUSSION: A protocol to maintain thawed plasma in the trauma bay at a rural Level II trauma center resulted in a miniscule increase in waste and cost when considering the scope of maintaining a trauma center. We think this cost is also minimal when compared with the value of having immediate access to thawed plasma. Constant availability of thawed plasma can be offered at smaller rural centers without a meaningful impact on cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Value-based Evaluations, Level III.

Practice Variation in Vena Cava Filter Use Among Trauma Centers in the National Trauma Database.

BACKGROUND: Agreement regarding indications for vena cava filter (VCF) utilization in trauma patients has been in flux since the filter's introduction. As VCF technology and practice guidelines have evolved, the use of VCF in trauma patients has changed. This study examines variation in VCF placement among trauma centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using data from the National Trauma Data Bank (2005-2014). Trauma centers were grouped according to whether they placed VCFs during the study period (VCF+/VCF-). A multivariable probit regression model was fit to predict the number of VCFs used among the VCF+ centers (the expected [E] number of VCF per center). The ratio of observed VCF placement (O) to expected VCFs (O:E) was computed and rank ordered to compare interfacility practice variation. RESULTS: In total, 65,482 VCFs were placed by 448 centers. Twenty centers (4.3%) placed no VCFs. The greatest predictors of VCF placement were deep vein thrombosis, spinal cord paralysis, and major procedure. The strongest negative predictor of VCF placement was admission during the year 2014. Among the VCF+ centers, O:E varied by nearly 500%. One hundred fifty centers had an O:E greater than one. One hundred sixty-nine centers had an O:E less than one. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation in practice is present in VCF placement. This variation cannot be explained only by the characteristics of the patients treated at these centers but could be also due to conflicting guidelines, changing evidence, decreasing reimbursement rates, or the culture of trauma centers.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of hernioplasties before and after the implementation of the ACERTO project / Análise da custo-efetividade em hernioplastias antes e após a implementação do projeto ACERTO

ABSTRACT Objective: to compare hospital costs and clinical outcomes in inguinal and incisional hernioplasty before and after implementation of the ACERTO project in a university hospital. Methods: retrospective study of 492 patients undergoing either inguinal hernioplasty (n=315) or incisional hernioplasty (n=177). The investigation involved two phases: between January 2002 and December 2005, encompassing cases admitted before the implementation of the ACERTO protocol (PRE-ACERTO period), and the other phase, with cases operated between January 2006 and December 2011, after the implementation of the protocol (ACERTO period). The main outcome variable was the comparison of the mean hospital costs between the two periods. As secondary endpoints, we analyzed the length of stay, the surgical site infection rate and mortality. We used the cost method suggested by Public Sector Cost Information System. Results: surgical site infection was higher (p = 0.039) in the first phase of the study for both inguinal hernia operations (2 (1.6%) versus 0 (0%) cases) and incisional hernioplasty (5 (7.6%) versus 3 (2.7%) cases). The length of stay decreased one day after the implementation of the ACERTO protocol (p=0.005). There was a reduction in costs per patient from R$ 4,328.58 per patient in the first phase to R$ 2,885.72 in the second phase (66.7% reduction). Conclusion: there was a reduction in infectious morbidity, length of stay and hospital costs in hernioplasty after the implementation of the ACERTO protocol.

RESUMO Objetivo: comparar custos hospitalares e desfechos clínicos em hernioplastias inguinal e incisional antes e após a implementação do projeto ACERTO, em hospital universitário. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo com 492 pacientes submetidos à hernioplastias inguinais (n=315) ou incisionais (n=177). A investigação envolveu duas fases: entre janeiro de 2002 e dezembro de 2005, englobando casos internados antes da implantação do protocolo ACERTO (período PRÉ-ACERTO), e outra, com casos operados entre janeiro de 2006 e dezembro de 2011, após a implantação (período ACERTO). A variável de desfecho principal foi o custo médio de internação comparando-se os dois períodos estudados. Como desfecho secundário, analisou-se tempo de internação, infecção de sítio cirúrgico e mortalidade. Foi utilizado o método de custeio do Sistema de Informação de Custos do Setor Público. Resultados: a ocorrência de infecção de sítio cirúrgico foi maior (p=0,039) na primeira fase do estudo tanto para hernioplastias inguinais (2 (1,6%) versus 0 (0%) casos) quanto para incisionais (5 (7,6%) versus 3 (2,7%) casos). O tempo de internação diminuiu em um dia após a implementação do protocolo ACERTO (p=0,005). Houve redução no custo por paciente indo de R$ 4.328,58 por paciente na 1ª fase para R$ 2.885,72 na 2ª fase (redução de 66,7%). Conclusão: o conjunto de dados mostrou que houve redução da morbidade infecciosa, tempo de internação e custos hospitalares em hernioplastias após a implementação do protocolo ACERTO.

Improving the quality of assessment and management of nasal trauma in a major trauma centre (MTC): Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham.

Background: Nasal fractures present in 39% of patients with facial trauma. These patients are assessed in the emergency department followed by outpatient review in the senior house officer-led emergency ear, nose and throat (ENT) clinic. Inadequate treatment of nasal trauma can result in debilitating functional and aesthetic problems. Inexperienced junior doctors may be apprehensive in assessing nasal trauma resulting in time pressured clinics and suboptimal management. Measures: A retrospective review of clinical noting over 3 months was carried out to gauge the extent of the problem. Three baseline measurements for satisfactory quality of assessments included: (1) 3/5 key symptoms elicited by the clinician (epistaxis, rhinorrhoea, nasal airway obstruction, dental malocclusion and diplopia). (2) Presence/absence of 'septal haematoma' (SH) and 'deviated nasal septum' (DNS) documented. (3) Patient follow-up within 2 weeks after the initial injury. Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were conducted with implementation of interventions (proforma, clinic poster, patient information leaflet and training) as visualised in our 'driver diagram'. Results: The quality of nasal trauma assessments improved following each intervention. There was an increase from 86% to 100% patients being seen within 2 weeks of the injury. There was an improvement in quality of assessments following the teaching as two-thirds (PDSA cycle 2) followed by 100% (PDSA cycle 3) of clinical documentation included 'rhinorrhoea' and 83% (PDSA cycle 2) to 100% (PDSA cycle 3) included 'nasal airway obstruction'. Similarly, two thirds (PDSA cycle 2) followed by 100% (PDSA cycle 3) examined and documented the presence/absence of SH and DNS. A 100% improvement in trainee confidence was reported. We are now conducting more comprehensive assessments of nasal trauma patients. Conclusion: The need to provide relevant training and support to ENT junior doctors is crucial in their development, as well as to ensure delivery of high-quality patient-centred care.

Protocol for a feasibility exploratory multicentre study of factors influencing trauma patients' outcomes of traffic crashes in Saudi Arabia.

INTRODUCTION: Road traffic injury is a leading cause of death for people of all ages. The burden of road traffic injuries is well established in developed countries. However, there has been limited investigation of the incidence and burden of road traffic injury in low/middle-income countries. With a proportionally high number of road users, there is a need to explore the factors in prehospital and hospital care in Saudi Arabia (SA) that are associated with mortality for adult trauma patients following road traffic crashes (RTCs). This paper outlines the method for the planned research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A feasibility exploratory multicentre study will be conducted at three purposefully selected hospitals with different trauma care resources in differing geographic locations of SA. The study sample will include all adult trauma patients who are involved in RTCs in SA and have been admitted to a study site in a 3-month period from May to July 2019. Data regarding the characteristics of the crashes and prehospital health care factors will be extracted from hospital databases where it is available. Information will be collected from patients or carers and hospital records in the two sites that do not have a registry. Patient status at 30 days post-injury, particularly mortality, will be assessed through hospital records. The relative contribution of a range of factors to predicting mortality will be explored using logistic regression analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee at King Saud Medical City (H-01-R-053), the General Department of Research and Studies at the Ministry of Health in SA (1440-1249939) and (1440-1398648), and the La Trobe University Human Research Ethics Committee (HEC19095). The results will be reported in a thesis and in peer-reviewed journal articles and conference presentations.

An audit of the polytrauma fracture detection rate of clinicians evaluating lodox statscan bodygrams in two South African public sector trauma units.

BACKGROUND: Increasing global demand for specialized radiological investigations has resulted in delayed or non-reporting of plain trauma radiographs by radiologists. This is particularly true in resource-limited environments, where referring clinicians rely largely on their own radiographic interpretation. A wide accuracy range has been documented for non-radiologist reporting of conventional trauma radiographs. The Lodox Statscan whole-body digital X-ray machine is a relatively new technology that poses unique interpretive challenges. The fracture detection rate of trauma clinicians utilizing this modality has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: An audit of the polytrauma fracture detection rate of clinicians evaluating Lodox Statscan bodygrams in two South African public-sector Trauma Units. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study of imaging data of Cape Town Level 1-equivalent public-sector Trauma Units during March-April 2015. Statscan bodygrams acquired for adult polytrauma triage were reviewed and correlated with follow-up imaging and patient records. Missed fractures were stratified by body part, mechanism of injury and ventilatory support. The fracture detection rate was determined with 95% confidence. The Generalised Fischer Exact Test assessed any association between the fracture site and failure of detection. Specialist orthopaedic review assessed the potential need for surgical management of missed fractures. RESULTS: 227 patients (male = 193, 85%; mean age: 33 years) were included; 195 fractures were demonstrated on the whole-body triage projections. Lower limb fractures predominated (n = 66, 34%). The fracture detection rate was 89% (95% CI = 86-93%), with the site of fracture associated with failure of detection (p = 0.01). Twelve of 21 undetected fractures (57%) involved the elbow or shoulder girdle. All elbow fractures (n = 3, 100%), more than half the shoulder girdle fractures (9/13,69%) and 12% (15/123) of extremity fractures were undetected. One missed fracture (1/21,4.7%) unequivocally required surgical management, while a further 7 (7/21, 33.3%) could potentially have benefitted from surgery, depending on follow-up imaging findings. CONCLUSION: This is the first analysis of the accuracy of bodygram polytrauma fracture detection by clinicians. Particular review of the shoulder girdle, elbow and extremities for subtle fractures, in addition to standardized limb positioning, are recommended for improved diagnostic accuracy in this setting. These findings can inform clinician training courses in this domain.

Race/Ethnicity and Geographic Access to Urban Trauma Care.

Importance: Little is known about the distribution of life-saving trauma resources by racial/ethnic composition in US cities, and if racial/ethnic minority populations disproportionately live in US urban trauma deserts. Objective: To examine racial/ethnic differences in geographic access to trauma care in the 3 largest US cities, considering the role of residential segregation and neighborhood poverty. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional, multiple-methods study evaluated census tract data from the 2015 American Community Survey in Chicago, Illinois; Los Angeles (LA), California; and New York City (NYC), New York (N = 3932). These data were paired to geographic coordinates of all adult level I and II trauma centers within an 8.0-km buffer of each city. Between February and September 2018, small-area analyses were conducted to assess trauma desert status as a function of neighborhood racial/ethnic composition, and geospatial analyses were conducted to examine statistically significant trauma desert hot spots. Main Outcomes and Measures: In small-area analyses, a trauma desert was defined as travel distance greater than 8.0 km to the nearest adult level I or level II trauma center. In geospatial analyses, relative trauma deserts were identified using travel distance as a continuous measure. Census tracts were classified into (1) racial/ethnic composition categories, based on patterns of residential segregation, including white majority, black majority, Hispanic/Latino majority, and other or integrated; and (2) poverty categories, including nonpoor and poor. Results: Chicago, LA, and NYC contained 798, 1006, and 2128 census tracts, respectively. A large proportion comprised a black majority population in Chicago (35.1%) and NYC (21.4%), compared with LA (2.7%). In primary analyses, black majority census tracts were more likely than white majority census tracts to be located in a trauma desert in Chicago (odds ratio [OR], 8.48; 95% CI, 5.71-12.59) and LA (OR, 5.11; 95% CI, 1.50-17.39). In NYC, racial/ethnic disparities were not significant in unadjusted models, but were significant in models adjusting for poverty and race-poverty interaction effects (adjusted OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.27-2.74). In comparison, Hispanic/Latino majority census tracts were less likely to be located in a trauma desert in NYC (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.11) and LA (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.40), but slightly more likely in Chicago (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.56-3.64). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, black majority census tracts were the only racial/ethnic group that appeared to be associated with disparities in geographic access to trauma centers.

How much green does it take to be orange? Determining the cost associated with trauma center readiness.

BACKGROUND: Readiness costs are real expenses incurred by trauma centers to maintain essential infrastructure to provide emergent services on a 24/7 basis. Although the components for readiness are well described in the American College of Surgeons' Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient, the cost associated with each component is not well defined. We hypothesized that meeting the requirements of the 2014 Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient would result in significant costs for trauma centers. METHODS: The state trauma commission in conjunction with trauma medical directors, program managers, and financial officers of each trauma center standardized definitions for each component of trauma center readiness cost and developed a survey tool for reporting. Readiness costs were grouped into four categories: administrative/program support staff, clinical medical staff, in-house operating room, and education/outreach. To verify consistent cost reporting, a financial auditor analyzed all data. Trauma center outliers were further evaluated to validate variances. All level I/level II trauma centers (n = 16) completed the survey on 2016 data. RESULTS: Average annual readiness cost is US $10,078,506 for a level I trauma center and US $4,925,103 for level IIs. Clinical medical staff was the costliest component representing 55% of costs for level Is and 64% for level IIs. Although education/outreach is mandated, levels I and II trauma centers only spend approximately US $100,000 annually on this category (1%-2%), demonstrating a lack of resources. CONCLUSION: This study defines the cost associated with each component of readiness as defined in the Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient manual. Average readiness cost for a level I trauma center is US $10,078,506 and US $4,925,103 for a level II. The significant cost of trauma center readiness highlights the need for additional trauma center funding to meet the requirements set forth by the American College of Surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and value-based evaluations, level III.

Achieving ethnic equality in the Israel trauma healthcare system: the case of the elderly population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if ethnic disparities exist with regard to the risk of injury and injury outcomes among elderly hospitalized casualties in Israel. METHODS: A retrospective study based on data from the Israeli National Trauma Registry between 2008 and 2017. Data included demographic, injury and hospitalization characteristics. Descriptive statistics and adjusted logistic regression were used to examine the differences between Jewish and Arab casualties, aged 65 and older. RESULT: The study included 96,795 casualties. The proportion of elderly hospitalized casualties was 2.8 times greater than their proportion in the population (3.1 times greater among Jews and 2.1 times among Arabs). In comparison to Arabs, Jews suffered from a greater percentage of head injuries (10.5 and 8.9%, respectively for Jews and Arabs p < .001), but fewer extremity injuries (46.7% vs. 48.0% respectively for Jews and Arabs p < .05). Among severe/critical casualties and among casualties with severe head injuries, Arabs were more likely to be transported to the hospital in a private car (27% vs. 21% respectively for Arabs and Jews p < .001; 30.5% vs. 23.3% respectively for Arabs and Jews p < .001). Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, gender, injury severity, type of injury, type of trauma center and year of admission, shows that Jews, relative to Arabs, were more likely to be hospitalized for more than seven days, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to be discharged to a rehabilitation center (OR: 1.3, 1.3 and 2.4 respectively). No differences regarding surgery (OR: 0.95) or in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.99) were found. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic disparities between Jewish and Arab hospitalized casualties were observed with regard to hospital stay, ICU admission and rehabilitation transfer. However, no differences were found with regard to mortality and surgery. While the reported disparities may be due in part by cultural differences and accessibility, health policy decision makers should aim to reduce the gaps by optimizing the accessibility of ambulance and rehabilitation services as well as increasing awareness regarding the availability of these medical services among the Arab population.

Developing a low budget trauma registry.

Trauma registry plays an essential role in collecting epidemiological injury data which is used in quality care improvement and research. This paper was planned toshare our experience of having developed a low-budget user-friendly trauma registry with the help of Microsoft Access. This was used because of its ease of use, quickdevelopment style, and support for relational database d esign. Var iable i nc lud ed in our registr y were demographics, description of injury, International Classification of Disease 9 Clinical Modification (ICD9- CM) external injury classification codes, date and time of arrival, length of hospital stay, referral to and from hospital, physiological assessment along with scores for assessing the injury severity. Developing a local trauma registry helped us in scrutinising our practice, and we believe that a national or regional trauma registry is the need of the hour in Pakistan. This will highlight the concerns specific to our society in providing quality trauma care.

[Optimization of criteria for activation of trauma teams : Avoidance of overtriage and undertriage]. / Optimierung der Kriterien zur Schockraumalarmierung : Vermeidung von Über- und Untertriage.

INTRODUCTION: Severely injured patients are supposed to be admitted to hospital via the trauma room. Appropriate criteria are contained in the S3 guidelines on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries (S3-GL); however, some of these criteria require scarce hospital resources while the patients then often clinically present as uninjured. There are tendencies to streamline the trauma team activation criteria (TTAC); however, additional undertriage must be avoided. A study group of the emergency, intensive care medicine and treatment of the severely injured section (NIS) is in the process of optimizing the TTAC for the German trauma system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In order to solve the objective the following multi-step approach is necessary: a) definition of patients who potentially benefit from TTA, b) verification of the definition in the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU), c) carrying out a prospective, multicenter study in order to determine overtriage and undertriage, thereby validating the activation criteria and d) revision of the current TTAC. RESULTS: This article summarizes the consensus criteria of the group assumed to be capable of identifying patients who potentially benefit from TTA. These criteria are used to test if TTA was justified in a specific case; however, as the TTCA of the S3-GL are not fully incorporated into the TR-DGU dataset and because cases must also be considered which were not subject to trauma room treatment and therefore were not included in the TR-DGU, it is necessary to perform a prospective full survey of all individuals in order to be able to measure overtriage and undertriage. CONCLUSION: Currently, the TR-DGU can only provide limited evidence on the quality of the TTAC recommended in Germany. This problem has been recognized and will be solved by conducting a prospective DGU-supported study, the results of which can be used to improve the TR-DGU dataset in order to enable further considerations on the quality of care (e. g. composition and size of the trauma team).

Trauma system in Greece: Quo Vadis?

INTRODUCTION: Implementation of trauma systems has markedly assisted in improving outcomes of the injured patient. However, differences exist internationally as diverse social factors, economic conditions and national particularities are placing obstacles. The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the current Greek trauma system, provide a comprehensive review and suggest key actions. METHODS: An exhaustive search of the - scarce on this subject - English and Greek literature was carried out to analyze all the main components of the Greek trauma system, according to American College of Surgeons' criteria, as well as the WHO Trauma Systems Maturity Index. RESULTS: Regarding prevention, efforts are in the right direction lowering the road traffic incidents-related death rate, however rural and insular regions remain behind. Hellenic Emergency Medical Service (EKAB) has well-defined communications and emergency phone line but faces problems with educating people on how to use it properly. In addition, equal and systematic training of ambulance personnel is a challenge, with the lack of pre-hospital registry and EMS quality assessment posing a question on where the related services are currently standing. Redistribution of facilities' roles with the establishment of the first formal trauma centre in the existing infrastructure would facilitate the development of a national registry and introduction of the trauma surgeon subspecialty with proper training potential. Definite rehabilitation institutional protocols that include both inpatient and outpatient care are needed. Disaster preparedness entails an extensive national plan and regular drills, mainly at the pre-hospital level. The lack, however, of any accompanying quality assurance programs hampers the effort to yield the desirable results. CONCLUSION: Despite recent economic crisis in Greece, actions solving logistics and organising issues may offer a well-defined, integrated trauma system without uncontrollably raising the costs. Political will is needed for reforms that use pre-existing infrastructure and working power in a more efficient way, with a first line priority being the establishment of the first major trauma centre that could function as the cornerstone for the building of the Greek trauma system.

Development of an otitis media strategy in the Pacific: key informant perspectivesThe Matthew effect in New Zealand rural hospital trauma and emergency care: why rural simulation-based education matters.

We describe a phenomenon of self-reinforcing inequality between New Zealand rural hospitals and urban trauma centres. Rural doctors work in remote geographical locations, with rare exposure to managing critical injuries, and with little direct support when they do. Paradoxically, but for the same reasons, they also have little access to the intensive training resources and specialist oversight of their university hospital colleagues. In keeping with international experience, we propose that using simulation-based education for rural hospital trauma and emergency team training will mitigate this effect. Along with several different organisations in New Zealand, the University of Otago rural postgraduate programme is developing inter-professional simulation content to address this challenge and open new avenues for research.

Appropriateness of patients transferred with orthopedic injuries: experience of a level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients are frequently transferred to a higher level of care for specialized orthopedic care. Many of these transfers are not necessary and waste valuable resources. The purpose of this study was to quantify our own experience and to assess the appropriateness of orthopedic transfers to a level I trauma center emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective review of orthopedic emergency department transfers to a level I trauma center was performed. Data collected included time of transfer, injury severity score (ISS), age, gender, race, orthopedic coverage at transfer institution, and insurance status. Two orthopedic trauma surgeons graded the appropriateness of transfer. A weighted logistic regression model was used to compare dependent and independent variables. RESULTS: A total of 324 patient transfers were reviewed; 65 (20.1%) of them were graded as inappropriate. There was no statistically significant relationship between appropriateness of transfer and age, availability of orthopedic coverage, night/weekend transfer, or insurance status. Regression analysis showed that only ISS (OR 1.130, p = .008) and "polytrauma" (OR 25.39, p < .0001) designation were associated with increased odds ratio of appropriate transfer. The kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between the two raters was 0.505 (95% CI, 0.388-0.623) reflecting moderate agreement. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate transfers create a significant medical burden to our health care system using valuable resources. Our study found similar results of inappropriate transfers compared to previous studies. However, we did not find a relationship between insurance status or nights/weekends and transfer appropriateness.

Avoiding Cribari gridlock: The standardized triage assessment tool improves the accuracy of the Cribari matrix method in identifying potential overtriage and undertriage.

BACKGROUND: The Cribari matrix method (CMM) is the standard to identify potential overtriage and undertriage but requires case reviews to correct for the fact that Injury Severity Score does not account for physiology or comorbidities, nor is it well correlated with resource consumption. Further, the secondary reviews introduce undesirable subjectivity. This study assessed if the Standardized Triage Assessment Tool (STAT)-a combination of the CMM and the Need For Trauma Intervention-could more accurately determine overtriage and undertriage than the CMM alone. METHODS: The registry of an American College of Surgeons verified Level I adult trauma center in Texas was queried for all new emergency department traumas 2013 to 2016 (n = 11,110). Binary logistic regressions were used to test the associations between the triage determinations of each metric against indicators of injury severity (risk factors, complications, and mortality) and resource consumption (number of procedures in 3 days and total length of stay). RESULTS: Both metrics were associated with the indicators of injury severity and resource consumption in the expected directions, but STAT had stronger or equivalent associations with all variables tested. Using the CMM, there was 50.4% overtriage and 9.1% undertriage. Using STAT, overtriage was reduced to 30.8% (relative reduction = 38.9%) and undertriage was reduced to 3.3% (relative reduction = 63.7%). CONCLUSION: Using the CMM with secondary case reviews makes valid multi-institutional triage rate comparisons impossible because of the subjective and unstandardized nature of these reviews. STAT's out-of-box triage determinations (i.e., without manual case review) outperformed CMM in almost every tested variable for both over- and undertriage. STAT, an automatic, standardized method offers significant improvements compared to the current subjective system. Further, by accounting for both anatomic injury severity and resource consumption, STAT may allow trauma centers to better allocate resources and predict patient needs with fewer cases requiring manual review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III.