Consensus Statement of the Saudi Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery on practice during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia.

The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has impacted essentially every country's healthcare system in extraordinary ways, fundamentally changing the way we deliver care. The practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery is no exception. In response to this global health crisis, the Saudi Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery has prepared this consensus statement to inform our clinical and other medical colleagues and the public at large on proper procedures during this time. The statement is based on the best scientific evidence available and follows the guidelines put forth by the Saudi Ministry of Health on the COVID-19 response. It explains how to manage and triage oral and maxillofacial patients based on the level of care needed at the time of clinical presentation.

Proceedings of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon's 2017 Clinical and Scientific Innovations in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (CSIOMS).

The sixth biennial Clinical and Scientific Innovations in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, formerly the Research Summit, of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and its Committee on Research Planning and Technology Assessment was held in Rosemont, Illinois from April 28 to 30, 2017. The goal of the symposium is to provide a forum for the latest clinical and scientific advances to be brought to the specialty. It also nurtures collaboration and the development of relationships between oral and maxillofacial surgeons and researchers to bridge the gap between clinical and basic science. The goal is to improve the care of oral and maxillofacial surgical patients through the advancement of translational and clinical research.

Proceedings of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2015 Research Summit.

The Fifth Biennial Research Summit of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and its Committee on Research Planning and Technology Assessment was held in Rosemont, Illinois on May 6 and 7, 2015. The goal of the symposium is to provide a forum for the most recent clinical and scientific advances to be brought to the specialty. The proceedings of the events of that summit are presented in this report.

Trends and attitudes regarding head and neck oncologic surgery: a survey of United States oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to: 1) estimate the prevalence and trends of American oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) programs in recruiting head and neck oncologic surgery (HNOS) -trained faculty, performing HNOS oncologic procedures and microvascular reconstruction, and presenting HNOS research at academic meetings; 2) estimate whether HNOS and microvascular reconstruction involvement varies among programs with or without a program director or chair trained in HNOS; 3) estimate whether HNOS involvement varies among those OMS programs that regularly attend and do not attend tumor board; 4) estimate whether HNOS involvement varies among those programs that have and have not presented HNOS research at an academic meeting; 5) estimate whether HNOS involvement varies among doctor of medicine-integrated and 4-year OMS programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators developed and distributed a survey to all US OMS program directors and/or chair composed of questions regarding faculty prevalence and recruitment, frequency and trends in cases, and the priority of applicants for residency with regard to HNOS. There were 18 close-ended questions, and one open-ended question. Responses were recorded in categorical, Likert, ordinal, and numerical format. Bivariate associations were calculated using Fisher exact test and logistic regression. RESULTS: Sixty-three of 101 surveys were returned (62.3%). Ten program directors or chair completed a fellowship in HNOS (15.9%). Programs with an HNOS-trained program director or chair were more likely to have another HNOS-trained faculty member (P = .01), performed more malignant tumor resections (P < .001), neck dissections (P < .001), and microvascular free-flap reconstructions (P = .02) than programs without program directors or chair trained in HNOS. Programs that regularly attended tumor board performed an increasing number of malignant tumor resections (P = .008); and neck dissections (P = .003) than programs that did not regularly attend their institution's tumor board. Presentations of HNOS-related research at national meetings did not differ between doctor of medicine-integrated and 4-year OMS programs (P = .7). There was no difference in the prevalence of HNOS-trained program directors and chair between doctor of medicine-integrated and 4-year programs (P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: This study's data and comments suggest that programs involved in HNOS have a strong involvement in expanded scope OMS and related academic activities.

Update on dental graduates entering medicine 1986-1991.

In a previous publication we reviewed the future career plans of 169 dental graduates who entered medical school from 1986 to 1991 inclusive. The aim of the present study was to find out what happened to this group after qualification from medical school. The 169 individuals were traced and a questionnaire was sent to them by mail. A reminder was sent and some data for non-respondents were obtained from public sources such as registers and directories. In the original study, 120 of the 154 respondents (78%) intended to become oral and maxillofacial surgeons. We found in this follow up survey that the overall return rate to oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) had dropped to 66%. For those not returning to the speciality, a wide range of alternative specialities had been chosen, with general medical practice (n=9) and oral medicine (n=8) being the most popular. Amongst those returning to OMFS, most undertook basic surgical training in general surgery and trauma. Two thirds of those eligible possessed the FRCS, with 43 (83%) holding the FRCS (Clinical Surgery in General) and six (12%) having the FRCS Ed (oral and maxillofacial surgery). Within the group, opinions were mixed about the changes caused by 'Hospital doctors: training for the future' (Calman Report) [Working Group on Specialist Medical Training. Hospital doctors: training for the future. London: Department of Health, 1993]. Concerns were voiced about the potential reduction in clinical experience, comparatively longer training for OMFS, and particularly the abrupt end of training with no protection whilst seeking a consultant appointment. Half thought that OMFS will become concentrated in supraregional centres, or head and neck units with related specialities.

Algunas tendencias actuales en la cirugía maxilofacial mayor ambulatoria. Nuestra experiencia / Some current tendencies in ambulatory major maxillofacial surgery. Our experience in this field

Se realizó un estudio observacional analítico transversal de 120 pacientes atendidos en el Servicio de Cirugía Maxilofacial del Hospital Provincial Clinicoquirúrgico Docente" Manuel Ascunce Domenech" de Camagüey, por el sistema de cirugía mayor ambulatoria, en el período de enero 1998 a diciembre 1999, con el objetivo de evaluar sus resultados en intervenciones complejas. Predominó el sexo masculino con el 59,2(por ciento) y dicha cirugía se realizó con mayor frecuencia entre los 25 y 34 años de edad. Las intervenciones más frecuentes fueron la reducción de fracturas orbitocigomáticas y nasales, cirugía sinusal y rinoplasia correctora, y los procederes quirúrgico y anestésico fueron satisfactorios, con escasas complicaciones posoperatorias no inherentes a estos. El proceder proporcionó un alto grado de satisfacción al paciente. El ahorro a la institución fue de $ 61 757.04 MN, lo que demuestra lo necesario de incrementar esta modalidad en nuestra institución(AU)

A crosswise, analytical and observational study was performed on 120 patients that underwent ambulatory major surgery in the maxillofacial surgery department of "Manuel Ascunce" Provincial Teaching Clinical and Surgical Hospital in Camaguey from January 1998 to December 1999. The objective was to evaluate the results of these complex interventions. Males prevailed (59,2 percent) and this type of surgery was mostly applied in the 25-34y age group. The most frequent interventions were the setting of orbito-zygomatic and nasal fractures, sinus surgery and corrective rhinoplasty. The surgical and anesthetic procedures were satisfactory with little post-operative complications no related to them. Ambulatory major surgery offered a high level of satisfaction to the patients. The institution saved 61 757.04 pesos, which showed that this modality should be more applied in our institution(AU)