Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 23(6): 600-602, 2020 Jun 25.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32521982

RESUMO

According to the main features of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME), we have designed a series of patented operating techniques, such as anal retractor, anal speculum and transanal port, to reduce the difficulty of transanal operation, shorten the surgeon's learning curve, and expand the indications of transanal surgery.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/cirurgia , Invenções , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/instrumentação , Humanos , Mesentério/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia
2.
Tech Coloproctol ; 23(5): 471-477, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31069556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the Versius surgical robotic system for transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a preclinical setting. METHODS: Dry laboratory and cadaveric sessions were first conducted for three experienced colorectal surgeons in order to gain familiarity with the modular surgical system and the robotic workstation. After introduction, the system was configured to allow for synchronous, totally robotic taTME in a cadaver. RESULTS: Using the modular robotic system, one surgeon performed the abdominal portion of the operation, including colonic mobilization and vascular pedicle ligation while simultaneously a second surgeon performed the transanal portion of the operation to the point of rendezvous at the peritoneal reflection, where the operation was completed cooperatively. The operation was successfully completed in 195 min demonstrating preclinical feasibility of this unique approach with an emerging robotic system. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first preclinical assessment of the Versius surgical robotic system for taTME. The ability to work simultaneously carries the theoretical advantage of reducing surgical time and thereby reducing overall operative costs. It may also allow surgeons to maintain focus on critical parts of the operation by halving the fatigue associated with long, complex cases such as taTME.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/instrumentação , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/educação , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/instrumentação , Cadáver , Competência Clínica , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos
3.
Rev. argent. coloproctología ; 30(1): 1-10, mar. 2019. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1023345

RESUMO

La morbilidad y alteración de la calidad de vida asociadas a la resección anterior del recto y amputación abdominoperineal determinaron un gran interés en el desarrollo del abordaje transanal. En los últimos años se ha visto un marcado desarrollo tecnológico en los dispositivos disponible para este abordaje. La cirugía por vía transanal ofrece ventajas en cuanto a sus resultados y complicaciones cuando se la compara a la cirugía por vía abdominal. La cirugía transanal mini-invasiva surge como una alternativa de abordaje videoendoscópico del recto. La resección local por cirugía endoscópica para los pólipos grandes de recto se ha convertido en un nuevo estándar de tratamiento en la mayoría de los centros, obteniendo piezas no fragmentadas con una alta tasa de márgenes negativos. En el presente estudio realizamos una revisión sobre la aplicación de TAMIS (TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery) al tratamiento de los pólipos de recto. (AU)


A great interest has developed in implementing trans anal minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of rectal adenomas and early rectal tumors. It present advantages when compare to radical surgery and peace meal endoscopic resections. TAMIS delivers non-fragmented specimens with clear resection margin in the majority of the cases. Such good technical results are mirrored with a low recurrence rate when evaluating rectal adenomas. This is a review of the application of TAMIS for the treatment of rectal adenomas. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reto/cirurgia , Pólipos Intestinais/cirurgia , Pólipos Intestinais/epidemiologia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/instrumentação , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/epidemiologia , Morbidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Sobreviventes , Incontinência Fecal/epidemiologia
4.
Colorectal Dis ; 20(5): O119-O122, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29575740

RESUMO

AIM: Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a novel approach for resection of the rectum. Use of a standard insufflator to create pneumorectum, however, results in bellowing-large heaving motions from insufflation of air that can frustrate surgery. We report the successful application of our technique, stable pneumorectum using an inline glove (SPRING), for the performance of transanal rectal excision in a series of 17 patients using a standard laparoscopic insufflator. METHOD: A retrospective review of 17 patients using the SPRING technique was performed between October 2015 and October 2016. Characteristics of these patients were evaluated, and technique-related short-term outcome was reviewed. RESULTS: The SPRING technique was successfully used in patients who underwent both minimally invasive (n = 14) and open (n = 3) approaches in the abdominal stage of the surgery. In the 12 patients who had rectal cancer for whom SPRING was used to facilitate taTME there were no conversions to an alternative access for rectal resection, the median duration of the TME part of the operation was 95 min (62-147) and there was one R1 resection (8%). Billowing was not a significant problem in any of the 17 patients during the surgery. CONCLUSION: In this case series we have successfully shown the feasibility of the SPRING technique as a practical and cost-effective solution to the problem of billowing during taTME.


Assuntos
Luvas Cirúrgicas , Insuflação/instrumentação , Protectomia/instrumentação , Reto/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/instrumentação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Luvas Cirúrgicas/economia , Humanos , Insuflação/economia , Insuflação/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Protectomia/economia , Protectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/economia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
World J Gastroenterol ; 23(31): 5798-5808, 2017 Aug 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28883706

RESUMO

AIM: To assess the efficacy of a modified approach with transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) using simple customized instruments in male patients with low rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 115 male patients with low rectal cancer from December 2006 to August 2015 were retrospectively studied. All patients had a bulky tumor (tumor diameter ≥ 40 mm). Forty-one patients (group A) underwent a classical approach of transabdominal total mesorectal excision (TME) and transanal intersphincteric resection (ISR), and the other 74 patients (group B) underwent a modified approach with transabdominal TME, transanal ISR, and taTME. Some simple instruments including modified retractors and an anal dilator with a papilionaceous fixture were used to perform taTME. The operative time, quality of mesorectal excision, circumferential resection margin, local recurrence, and postoperative survival were evaluated. RESULTS: All 115 patients had successful sphincter preservation. The operative time in group B (240 min, range: 160-330 min) was significantly shorter than that in group A (280 min, range: 200-360 min; P = 0.000). Compared with group A, more complete distal mesorectum and total mesorectum were achieved in group B (100% vs 75.6%, P = 0.000; 90.5% vs 70.7%, P = 0.008, respectively). After 46.1 ± 25.6 mo follow-up, group B had a lower local recurrence rate and higher disease-free survival rate compared with group A, but these differences were not statistically significant (5.4% vs 14.6%, P = 0.093; 79.5% vs 65.1%, P = 0.130). CONCLUSION: Retrograde taTME with simple customized instruments can achieve high-quality TME, and it might be an effective and economical alternative for male patients with bulky tumors.


Assuntos
Mesocolo/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/instrumentação , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Duração da Cirurgia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/efeitos adversos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/economia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/instrumentação , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/economia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA