Valoración del dolor y aplicación de intervenciones terapéuticas enfermeras en el paciente neonatal y pediátrico, en contextos asistenciales hospitalarios / Pain assessment and implementation of nursing therapeutic interventions in neonatal and pediatric patients, in welfare hospital contexts

El dolor es una realidad, una experiencia subjetiva culturalmente construida y sociohistóricamente determinada desde la más tierna infancia. Con respecto a los cuidados proporcionados a niños y adolescentes un reto de vigente actualidad es el alivio del dolor tanto agudo como crónico. Los abordajes para su tratamiento han ido cambiando y mejorando a medida que aumentaban los conocimientos por lo que disponemos de una gran variedad de intervenciones terapéuticas tanto farmacológicas como no farmacológicas. El objetivo del trabajo es visibilizar cómo se lleva a cabo la valoración del dolor en ciertas técnicas, procedimientos y procesos patológicos, así como los conocimientos que sobre intervenciones terapéuticas enfermeras para el alivio del dolor y su grado de aplicación en contextos asistenciales hospitalarios. En este artículo exclusivamente se muestran los resultados relativos a la valoración del dolor. Pude concluirse que existen algunos procesos patológicos en los que no se apuntaba la pertinencia de valorar el dolor., posiblemente no se trate de una inadecuada valoración del dolor sino por el motivo de ingreso en las unidades estudiadas. Con respecto a técnicas y procedimientos apuntan en el mismo sentido, aunque se cree importante profundizar en las causas que subyacen en aquellos casos en los que no se valora en ningún momento del procedimiento el dolor del paciente pediátrico(AU)

Pain is a reality, a subjective experience culturally built and socio-historically determined from the earliest childhood. With regard to the care provided to children and adolescents, a challenge of a present validity is the pain relief, both acute and chronic. Approaches for treatment have been changing and improving as knowledge increased so we have a wide variety of therapeutic interventions both pharmacological and non-pharmacological. The objective of this study is to demonstrate how to carry out the assessment of pain in certain techniques, procedures and pathological processes and as well as the knowledge on therapeutic interventions nursing for pain relief and its level of application in welfare hospital contexts. In this article exclusively is shown the results related to pain assessment. It may be concluded that there are some pathological processes that were not pointed out the relevance of evaluating the pain, possibly is not a case of an inadequate assessment of pain but the reason for admission in the studied units. With regard to techniques and procedures they pointed in the same direction, although it is believed important to look into the causes underlying those cases where the procedure of the pain of the pediatric patient is not valued at any moment(AU)

A perfect storm in interventional pain management: regulated, but unbalanced.

Interventional pain management now stands at the crossroads at what is described as "the perfect storm." The confluence of several factors has led to devastating results for interventional pain management. This article seeks to provide a perspective to various issues producing conditions conducive to creating a "perfect storm" such as use and abuse of interventional pain management techniques, and in the same context, use and abuse of various non-interventional techniques. The rapid increase in opioid drug prescribing, costs to health care, large increases in death rates, and random and rampant drug testing, can also lead to increases in health care utilization. Other important aspects that are seldom discussed include medico-legal and ethical perspectives of individual and professional societal opinions and the interpretation of diagnostic accuracy of controlled diagnostic blocks. The aim of this article is to discuss the impact of several factors on interventional pain management and overuse, abuse, waste, and fraud; inappropriate application without evidence-based literature support (sometimes leading to selective use or non-use of randomized or observational studies for proving biased viewpoints - post priori rather than a priori), and issues related to multiple professional societies having their own agendas to push rather than promulgating the science of interventional pain management. This perspective is based on a review of articles published in this issue of Pain Physician, information in the public domain, and other relevant articles. Based on the results of this review, various issues of relevance to modern interventional pain management are discussed and the viewpoints of several experts debated. In conclusion, supporters of interventional pain management disagree on multiple aspects for various reasons while detractors claim that interventional pain management should not exist as a speciality. Issues to be addressed include appropriate use of evidence-based medicine (EBM), overuse, overutilization, and abuse.

A crisis in chronic pain care: an ethical analysis. Part three: Toward an integrative, multi-disciplinary pain medicine built around the needs of the patient.

A number of variables have contributed to the current crisis in chronic pain care and are affected by, and affect, the philosophies and politics that influence the socio-economic climate of the American healthcare system. Thus, we posit that managing the crisis in chronic pain care in the United States is contingent upon the development of a multi-focal healthcare paradigm that more thoroughly enables and fortifies research, its translation (in education and practice), and the implementation of, and support for, both the curative and healing approaches in medicine in general, and pain care specifically. These steps necessitate re-examination, if not revision of the health care system and its economics. The ethical imperative to consider and prudently employ cutting-edge diagnostic and therapeutic technologies in pain medicine is obligatory. However, "supply side prudence" is of little value if "demand side accessibility" is lacking. Revisions to health insurance plans advocated by the in-coming administration seek to create uniformity in basic health care services based upon re-assessment of the clinical effectiveness (versus merely cost) of treatments, including those that are "high tech." These plans attempt to allow every patient a more complete ability to deliberatively work with physicians to access those services and resources that maximize health functioning and goals. But even given these revisions, authentic pain care must take into account the interactive contexts of the painient individual. The biopsychosocial model of chronic pain management may have significant practical and ethical worth in this regard. A system of pain treatment operating from a biopsychosocial perspective necessitates integrative multi-disciplinarity. We propose a tiered, multi-disciplinary paradigm based upon the differing needs of each specific patient. But establishing such a system does not guarantee access, and distribution of these services and resources requires economic support to ensure that capabilities are more broadly available (i.e., supplied), and afforded as needed and wanted (i.e., demanded). Toward this end, we posit the need to focus upon, and more fully integrate 1) education, 2) multi-disciplinary care (including re-vivification of MPCs), 3) policies that allow financial subsidies that afford patients the latitude to access and utilize such expanded resources appropriately to meet identified medical needs, and 4) medico-legal initiatives and statutes that protect and enable patients and physicians. The proposed changes comport with a number of ethical systems in that they support the basic deontic structure of the profession and allow for a richer, more finely grained articulation of clinical and ethical responsibilities within the scope of particular general, specialty, and sub-specialty practices.