Disseminated intravascular coagulation: epidemiology, biomarkers, and management.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a systemic activation of the coagulation system, which results in microvascular thrombosis and, simultaneously, potentially life-threatening haemorrhage attributed to consumption of platelets and coagulation factors. Underlying conditions, e.g. infection, cancer, or obstetrical complications are responsible for the initiation and propagation of the DIC process. This review provides insights into the epidemiology of DIC and the current understanding of its pathophysiology. It details the use of diagnostic biomarkers, current diagnostic recommendations from international medical societies, and it provides an overview of emerging diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Last, it provides guidance on management. It is concluded that timely and accurate diagnosis of DIC and its underlying condition is essential for the prognosis. Treatment should primarily focus on the underlying cause of DIC and supportive treatment should be individualised according to the underlying aetiology, patient's symptoms and laboratory records.

Blood transfusion utilization in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: The acute respiratory illness designated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and caused a worldwide pandemic. Concerns arose about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood donations and potential significant blood transfusion needs in severely ill COVID-19 patients. Data on blood usage in hospitalized COVID-19 patients are scarce. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of blood component transfusions in the first 4 weeks of COVID-19 ward admissions. The study period began 14 days before the first COVID-19 cohort wards opened in our hospital in March 2020 and ended 28 days afterward. The number of patients and blood components transfused in the COVID-19 wards was tabulated. Transfusion rates of each blood component were compared in COVID-19 wards versus all other inpatient wards. RESULTS: COVID-19 wards opened with seven suspected patients and after 4 weeks had 305 cumulative COVID-19 admissions. Forty-one of 305 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (13.4%) received transfusions with 11.1% receiving red blood cells (RBCs), 1.6% platelets (PLTs), 1.0% plasma, and 1.0% cryoprecipitate (cryo). COVID-19 wards had significantly lower transfusion rates compared to non-COVID wards for RBCs (0.03 vs 0.08 units/patient-day), PLTs (0.003 vs 0.033), and plasma (0.002 vs 0.018; all p < 0.0001). Cryo rates were similar (0.008 vs 0.009, p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients required many fewer blood transfusions than other hospitalized patients. COVID-19 transfusion data will inform planning and preparation of blood resource utilization during the pandemic.

Assessment of bleeding in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation after receiving surgery and recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin: A cohort study using a database.

We aimed to investigate the incidence of bleeding-related adverse events (AEs) among patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) receiving recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) and those receiving other DIC treatments, the incidence by type of surgery, and the incidence when either blood transfusion or a hemostatic procedure was administered to treat DIC. In this cohort study, data were obtained from a large medical database (22 centers in Japan). The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of bleeding-related AEs by type of surgery. The secondary endpoint was the incidence rate of bleeding-related AEs based on whether blood transfusion or a hemostatic procedure was administered after the day of DIC treatment. In total, 4234 propensity score-matched patients were included in the main analysis (2117 patients each in the rTM and non-rTM groups). In the rTM and non-rTM groups, respectively, the incidence of bleeding-related AEs was 18.8% and 24.8% (p <0.001; risk ratio [RR] 0.757, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.674-0.849), among patients requiring any type of surgery; 15.0% and 19.5% (p = 0.0001; RR 0.769, 95% CI 0.673-0.879) in patients requiring blood transfusion or a hemostatic procedure after the day of DIC treatment; 10.2% and 11.6% (p = 0.4470; RR 0.879, 95% CI 0.630-1.226) in patients undergoing hepatic, biliary, or pancreatic surgery; 24.3% and 25.4% (p = 0.6439; RR 0.955, 95% CI 0.786-1.160) in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries; and 18.5% and 30.1% (p = 0.0001; RR 0.614, 95% CI 0.481-0.782) in patients undergoing cardiac or cardiovascular surgery. Our findings suggest that rTM treatment for Japanese postsurgical patients who develop DIC was associated with significantly fewer bleeding-related AEs compared with those receiving other DIC treatments.

[New cross-sectional guidelines of the German Medical Association for hemotherapy with fresh frozen plasma. Evidence-based recommendations for risk-benefit assessment]. / Neue (Querschnitt-)Leitlinien der Bundesärztekammer für die Hämotherapie mit gefrorenem Frischplasma. Evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen für die Risiko-Nutzen-Abwägung.

Some new blood products and plasma derivatives have extended the possibilities in hemotherapy to such an extent that the therapeutic and evidence-based therapy options can only really be managed with the aid of guidelines. Four approved plasma preparations are available in Germany: fresh frozen plasma, lyophilized plasma, solvent-detergent (SD) pool plasma and methylene blue-light-treated plasma. Evidence of the clinical efficacy of plasma is mainly based on uncontrolled observational studies, case reports or expert opinion. Plasma is indicated for complex coagulopathy associated with manifest or imminent bleeding, particularly with massive transfusion, disseminated intravascular coagulation and liver disease. With the exception of emergency situations when clotting assay results are not available in time, a clinically relevant coagulopathy must be verified before plasma is administered. The rapid infusion of at least 10 ml of plasma per kg body weight is required to significantly increase the respective clotting factor or inhibitor levels. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PPSB) should be preferred to plasma for the rapid reversal of oral anticoagulation. Side effects of plasma are rare but have to be considered.

Clinical course and outcome of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosed by Japanese Association for Acute Medicine criteria. Comparison between sepsis and trauma.

The Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) study group recently announced new diagnostic criteria for DIC. These criteria have been prospectively validated and demonstrated to progress to overt DIC as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). Although an underlying condition is essential for the development of DIC, it has never been clarified if patients with different underlying disorders have a similar course. Among 329 patients with DIC diagnosed by the JAAM criteria, those with underlying sepsis (n = 98) or trauma (n = 95) were compared. The 28-day mortality rate was significantly higher in sepsis patients than trauma patients (34.7% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.0001). Within three days of fulfilling the JAAM criteria, sepsis patients had a lower platelet count, higher prothrombin time ratio, higher systemic inflammatory response syndrome score, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score compared with trauma patients. On day 3, a significantly higher percentage of trauma patients than sepsis patients showed improvement of DIC (64.2% vs. 30.6%, p < 0.001). These differences were mainly due to patients with lower JAAM DIC scores. More than 50% of the JAAM DIC patients with sepsis who died within 28 days could not be detected by ISTH DIC criteria during the initial three days. In contrast, most trauma patients who died within 28 days had DIC simultaneously diagnosed by JAAM and ISTH criteria, except for those with brain death. These findings suggest that coagulation abnormalities, organ dysfunction, and the outcome of JAAM DIC differ between patients with sepsis and trauma.

Platelet transfusion trigger in difficult patients.

There is general consensus that a prophylactic pre-transfusion trigger at 10.000 platelets/microL in stable oncohematological patients is as safe as the traditional trigger of 20.000/microL, and that perioperative triggers at 50.000 and 100.000/microL are adequate in most surgical and neurosurgical conditions respectively. Guidelines on the trigger and other issues related to platelet transfusion can be found in nine documents published during 1987-2001 by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the British Committee on Standardization in Hematology, the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, the College of American Pathologists, the American Society of Anesthesiology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Although consensus may be less evident on specific triggers for 'difficult' patients, the following triggers, listed by progressively increasing levels, have been proposed in the literature and have found general agreement: a stable oncohematological recipient: 10.000; lumbar puncture in a stable pediatric leukemic patient: 10.000; thrombocytopenia secondary to gpIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors [corrected]:10.000; bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: 20.000; gastrointestinal endoscopy in cancer: 20.000-40.000; disseminated intravascular coagulation: 20.000-50.000; fiber-optic bronchoscopy in a bone marrow transplant recipient: 20.000-50.000; neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: 30.000; major surgery in leukemia: 50.000; thrombocytopenia secondary to massive transfusion: 50.000; invasive procedures in cirrhosis: 50.000; cardiopulmonary bypass: 50.000-60.000; liver biopsy: 50.000-100.000; a nonbleeding premature infant: 60.000; neurosurgery: 100.000. The proposed values must be considered within the context of careful clinical evaluation of each individual patient, and attention should be given to the power of discrimination of platelet counters at low counts and to the prompt availability of good quality platelet products in the case of emergency.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation: objective clinical and laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and assessment of therapeutic response.

Current concepts of the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical and laboratory diagnosis and management of fulminant and low-grade disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) have been presented. Considerable attention has been devoted to interrelationships within the hemostasis system. Only by clearly understanding the pathophysiological interrelationships can the clinician and laboratory scientist appreciate the divergent and wide spectrum of often confusing clinical and laboratory findings in patients with DIC. Objective clinical and laboratory criteria for diagnosis of DIC have been delineated, thus avoiding needless confusion and empirical decisions regarding the diagnosis. Many therapeutic decisions to be made are controversial and will remain so until more is published about specific therapeutic modalities and survival patterns. Also, therapy must be highly individualized depending on the nature of DIC, age, etiology of DIC, site and severity of hemorrhage or thrombosis, and hemodynamic and other clinical parameters. Also presented are clear criteria for severity of DIC and objective criteria for defining a response to therapy. Also, since it is often difficult for the individual physician to decide when to stop expensive therapy, objective criteria by which therapy may be stopped when continuation is likely fruitless are presented as a guideline.