Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 67
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Cancer ; 127(14): 2545-2552, 2021 07 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33793979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early discontinuation is a substantial barrier to the delivery of endocrine therapies (ETs) and may influence recurrence and survival. The authors investigated the association between early discontinuation of ET and social determinants of health, including insurance coverage and the neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), which was measured on the basis of patients' zip codes, in breast cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of a prospective randomized clinical trial (Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment), women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who started ET within a year of study entry were included. Early discontinuation was calculated as stopping ET within 4 years of its start for reasons other than distant recurrence or death via Kaplan-Meier estimates. A Cox proportional hazards joint model was used to analyze the association between early discontinuation of ET and factors such as the study-entry insurance and NDI, with adjustments made for other variables. RESULTS: Of the included 9475 women (mean age, 55.6 years; White race, 84%), 58.0% had private insurance, whereas 11.7% had Medicare, 5.8% had Medicaid, 3.8% were self-pay, and 19.1% were treated at international sites. The early discontinuation rate was 12.3%. Compared with those with private insurance, patients with Medicaid (hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.92) and self-pay patients (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.25-2.17) had higher early discontinuation. Participants with a first-quartile NDI (highest deprivation) had a higher probability of discontinuation than those with a fourth-quartile NDI (lowest deprivation; HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11-1.62). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' insurance and zip code at study entry play roles in adherence to ET, with uninsured and underinsured patients having a high rate of treatment nonadherence. Early identification of patients at risk may improve adherence to therapy. LAY SUMMARY: In this retrospective analysis of 9475 women with breast cancer participating in a clinical trial (Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment), Medicaid and self-pay patients (compared with those with private insurance) and those in the highest quartile of neighborhood deprivation scores (compared with those in the lowest quartile) had a higher probability of early discontinuation of endocrine therapy. These social determinants of health assume larger importance with the expected increase in unemployment rates and loss of insurance coverage in the aftermath of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Early identification of patients at risk and enrollment in insurance optimization programs may improve the persistence of therapy.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação e Adesão ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Características de Residência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
3.
Biomedica ; 40(4): 626-640, 2020 12 02.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33275342

RESUMO

Introduction: The Xpert MTB/RIF™ is a rapid molecular test that diagnoses tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. Since 2010, it is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and although it was introduced in Colombia since 2012, the results of its implementation are unknown. Objective: To describe the coverage and fidelity in the implementation of the Xpert MTB/RIF™ in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in a city with a high burden for the disease in Colombia. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive study of cases from a tuberculosis program in Cali between 2013 and 2019. We estimated the coverage as the total number of tests used compared to the cases registered in the program and the fidelity based on international Xpert MTB/RIF™ implementation protocols. We performed a multivariate analysis of multiple correspondences between the test and the sociodemographic variables. Results: We included 6,328 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis of whom 181 were drugresistant. The Xpert MTB/RIF™ coverage was 10,3% (n=655) with an annual variation between 0.2% and 23%. Loyalty among the highest risk groups of MDR-TB was 46.8%. The use of the test was related to being an Afro-Colombian man between 41 and 60 years of age. Conclusions: The coverage of the Xpert MTB/RIF in Cali is low and its use does not follow the recommended prioritization for its implementation. Implementation strategies are required for its proper use to contribute to the goal of ending tuberculosis.


Introducción. La prueba Xpert MTB/RIF™ es una prueba molecular rápida para el diagnóstico de la tuberculosis y la resistencia a la rifampicina. Desde el 2010 es la recomendada por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) y, aunque fue introducida en Colombia en el 2012, se desconocen los resultados de su uso. Objetivo. Describir la cobertura y la fidelidad en el uso de la prueba Xpert MTB/RIF™ en pacientes con tuberculosis pulmonar en una ciudad con alta carga de la enfermedad en Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio retrospectivo descriptivo de casos del programa de tuberculosis en Cali entre el 2013 y el 2019. La cobertura se estimó como el total de pruebas empleadas en los casos registrados en el programa. La fidelidad se midió con base en los protocolos internacionales de uso de la Xpert MTB/RIF™. Además, se hizo un análisis de correspondencias múltiples entre la prueba y las variables sociodemográficas. Resultados. Se incluyeron 6.328 pacientes con tuberculosis pulmonar, de los cuales 181 eran resistentes a los fármacos. La cobertura total de la Xpert MTB/RIF™ durante el periodo de estudio fue de 10,3 % (n=655), con una variación anual entre 0,2 y 23 %. La fidelidad fue de 46,8 % para los grupos de mayor riesgo de tuberculosis multirresistente (TB-MDR). El uso de la prueba se relacionó con la condición de ser hombre, afrocolombiano, y tener entre 41 y 60 años de edad. Conclusiones. La cobertura de la prueba Xpert MTB/RIF™ en Cali es baja y su uso no responde a la priorización recomendada para su implementación. Se requieren estrategias para promover su uso adecuado, de manera que contribuya a la meta de poner fin a la tuberculosis.


Assuntos
Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/estatística & dados numéricos , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibióticos Antituberculose/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/microbiologia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 18(7): 866-872, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32634780

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical adoption of the sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for cancer has rapidly increased in recent years. This sequencing is used to select targeted therapy and monitor nonresponding or progressive tumors to identify mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. Our study objective was to review available coverage policies for cancer ctDNA-based testing panels to examine trends from 2015 to 2019. METHODS: We analyzed publicly available private payer policies and Medicare national coverage determinations and local coverage determinations (LCDs) for ctDNA-based panel tests for cancer. We coded variables for each year representing policy existence, covered clinical scenario, and specific ctDNA test covered. Descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: We found that 38% of private payer coverage policies provided coverage of ctDNA-based panel testing as of July 2019. Most private payer policy coverage was highly specific: 87% for non-small cell lung cancer, 47% for EGFR gene testing, and 79% for specific brand-name tests. There were 8 final, 2 draft, and 2 future effective final LCDs (February 3 and March 15, 2020) that covered non-FDA-approved ctDNA-based tests. The draft and future effective LCDs were the first policies to cover pan-cancer use. CONCLUSIONS: Coverage of ctDNA-based panel testing for cancer indications increased from 2015 to 2019. The trend in private payer and Medicare coverage is an increasing number of coverage policies, number of positive policies, and scope of coverage. We found that Medicare coverage policies are evolving to pan-cancer uses, signifying a significant shift in coverage frameworks. Given that genomic medicine is rapidly changing, payers and policymakers (eg, guideline developers) will need to continue to evolve policies to keep pace with emerging science and standards in clinical care.


Assuntos
DNA Tumoral Circulante , Cobertura do Seguro , Neoplasias , Políticas , Idoso , DNA Tumoral Circulante/genética , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Medicare , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos
5.
Am J Manag Care ; 26(2): e28-e35, 2020 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32059097

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a type of radiation therapy (RT) used for certain cancer types because it minimizes collateral tissue damage. The high cost and limited availability of PBT have constrained its utilization. This study examined patterns and determinants of PBT use in California. STUDY DESIGN: Persons with diagnoses of all cancer types from 2003 to 2016 inclusive who had any type of RT were identified in the California Cancer Registry in this retrospective analysis. METHODS: Cross-tabulations were performed to summarize the demographic characteristics of the study population, both for individuals who received PBT and for those who received other RT modalities. PBT use patterns over time were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression models assessed the effects of demographics and health insurance type on receipt of PBT. RESULTS: Of the 2,499,510 people with a cancer diagnosis during the study period, 578,632 (23%) received some type of RT, and of these, 8609 received PBT (1.5%). PBT was most often used to treat cancers of the prostate (41.3%), breast (14.0%), eye (11.7%), lung (6.1%), and brain (6.0%). PBT use was highest in 2003-2004 and then declined over time. PBT use was significantly associated with being white or male, younger age, higher socioeconomic status, Medicare or dual Medicare-Medicaid insurance, uninsured/self-pay status, and proximity to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist in PBT use by demographics and health insurance type. The identified racial and socioeconomic disparities merit further investigation. More granular studies on both use patterns and effectiveness of PBT for specific cancers are needed to draw stronger conclusions about its cost-benefit ratio.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/radioterapia , Terapia com Prótons/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , California/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
6.
Public Health Rep ; 134(5): 542-551, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31269411

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In 2011, Wisconsin introduced the 2003 Revision of the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth, which includes a variable for principal payer. This variable could help in estimating Medicaid coverage for delivery services, but its accuracy in most states is not known. Our objective was to validate Medicaid payer classification on Wisconsin birth records. METHODS: We linked 128 141 Wisconsin birth records (2011-2012 calendar years) to 54 600 Medicaid claims. Using claims as the gold standard, we measured the payer variable's validity (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV]) overall and by maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, facility delivery volume, and the Medicaid proportion of facility delivery volume. Multivariable log-binomial regression tested the association between each characteristic and payer misclassification among Medicaid-paid births. RESULTS: Of 128 141 birth records, 50 652 (39.5%) indicated Medicaid as the principal payer and 54 600 (42.6%) linked to a Medicaid claim. The birth record misclassified 10 007 of 54 600 (18.3%) Medicaid-paid births as non-Medicaid and 6059 of 73 541 (8.2%) non-Medicaid births as Medicaid-paid. The payer variable was less sensitive (81.7%) than specific (91.8%), and PPV and NPV were similar (∼88%). Sensitivity was highest among mothers who were Hispanic, had no high school diploma, or delivered in Medicaid-majority delivery facilities. Maternal age ≥40, maternal education >high school, and delivering in a non-Medicaid-majority delivery facility were positively associated with payer misclassification among Medicaid-paid births. CONCLUSION: Differential misclassification of principal payer in the birth record may bias risk surveillance of Medicaid deliveries.


Assuntos
Declaração de Nascimento , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Medicaid , Adolescente , Adulto , Saúde da Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Materna , Estados Unidos , Wisconsin , Adulto Jovem
7.
Cancer ; 124(4): 760-768, 2018 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29112234

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients with Medicaid, Medicare, or no insurance show poor outcomes in comparison with privately insured patients. It was hypothesized that nonprivate insurance coverage biases the selection of the treatment site to favor hospitals that are not associated with optimum treatment outcomes. This study assessed the relation between the insurance type of HNC patients and the hospital type for inpatient care. METHODS: Adult HNC patients were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2012 and 2013). The primary exposure was the insurance provider type. The outcome was the hospital type, which was classified by the hospital's ownership and its location and teaching status. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to control for the patient's age, sex, race, income, mortality risk, and geographic location. The analysis was weighted and was adjusted for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: In all, 37,466 HNC patients representing 187,330 patients nationally were identified. After adjustments for age, sex, race, income, and mortality risk, in comparison with privately insured patients, Medicaid, Medicare, and uninsured patients demonstrated 1.14 to 2.29 increased odds of undergoing treatment at rural, urban nonteaching, private investor-owned, or government (nonfederal) hospitals (P < .05). This trend remained apparent even after adjustments for the geographic location. CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured patients or patients insured by government programs predominantly underwent care for HNC at hospital types most often associated with inferior survival outcomes. This finding could explain some proportion of insurance-related disparities in HNC outcomes. Further studies are warranted to determine whether interventions to promote equitable access to optimal hospital settings for patients, regardless of their insurance type, might improve outcomes among nonprivate insurance holders. Cancer 2018;124:760-8. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Hospitalização/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Medicaid/economia , Medicare/economia , Idoso , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/economia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais/classificação , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
8.
Soc Sci Med ; 165: 10-18, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27485728

RESUMO

Within a healthcare system with managed competition, health insurers are expected to act as prudent buyers of care on behalf of their customers. To fulfil this role adequately, understanding consumer preferences for health plan characteristics is of vital importance. Little is known, however, about these preferences and how they vary across consumers. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) we quantified trade-offs between basic health plan characteristics and analysed whether there are differences in preferences according to age, health status and income. We selected four health plan characteristics to be included in the DCE: (i) the level of provider choice and associated level of reimbursement, (ii) the primary focus of provider contracting (price, quality, social responsibility), (iii) the level of service benefits, and (iv) the monthly premium. This selection was based on a literature study, expert interviews and focus group discussions. The DCE consisted of 17 choice sets, each comprising two hypothetical health plan alternatives. A representative sample (n = 533) of the Dutch adult population, based on age, gender and educational level, completed the online questionnaire during the annual open enrolment period for 2015. The final model with four latent classes showed that being able to choose a care provider freely was by far the most decisive characteristic for respondents aged over 45, those with chronic conditions, and those with a gross income over €3000/month. Monthly premium was the most important choice determinant for young, healthy, and lower income respondents. We conclude that it would be very unlikely for half of the sample to opt for health plans with restricted provider choice. However, a premium discount up to €15/month by restricted health plans might motivate especially younger, healthier, and less wealthy consumers to choose these plans.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Seguro Saúde/economia , Legislação Referente à Liberdade de Escolha do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Comportamento do Consumidor/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Legislação Referente à Liberdade de Escolha do Paciente/economia , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
Am Surg ; 82(2): 146-51, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26874137

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to quantify health insurance misclassification among children treated at a pediatric trauma center and to determine factors associated with misclassification. Demographic, medical, and financial information were collected for patients at our institution between 2008 and 2010. Two health insurance variables were created: true (insurance on hospital admission) and payer (source of payment). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine which factors were independently associated with health insurance misclassification. The two values of health insurance status were abstracted from the hospital financial database, the trauma registry, and the patient medical record. Among 3630 patients, 123 (3.4%) had incorrect health insurance designation. Misclassification was highest in patients who died: 13.9 per cent among all deaths and 30.8 per cent among emergency department deaths. The adjusted odds of misclassification were 6.7 (95% confidence interval: 1.7, 26.6) among patients who died and 16.1 (95% confidence interval: 3.2, 80.77) among patients who died in the emergency department. Using payer as a proxy for health insurance results in misclassification. Approaches are needed to accurately ascertain true health insurance status when studying the impact of insurance on treatment outcomes.


Assuntos
Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Admissão do Paciente , Centros de Traumatologia/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , District of Columbia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
West J Emerg Med ; 16(4): 527-34, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265964

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Limited data are available regarding differences in presentation and management of pediatric emergency department (PED) patients based on insurance status. The objective of the study was to assess the difference in management of pediatric facial lacerations based on medical insurance status. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with universal sampling of patients with facial lacerations who were treated in an urban PED (45K visits/year) over a one-year period. Demographic features and injury characteristics for patients with commercial (private) insurance and those with Medicaid or Medicare (public) insurance were compared. RESULTS: Of 1235 children included in the study, 667 (54%) had private insurance and 485 (39%) had public insurance. The two groups did not differ in age or gender, arrival by ambulance, location of injury occurrence, mechanism of injury, part of face involved, length or depth of laceration, use of local anesthetic, or method of repair but differed in acuity assigned at triage. Patients with public insurance were found less likely to have subspecialty consultation in bivariable (OR=0.41, 95% CI [0.24-0.68]) and multivariable logistic regression analyses (OR=0.45, 95% CI [0.25-0.78]). Patients with public insurance received procedural sedation significantly less often than those with private insurance (OR=0.48, 95% CI [0.29-0.76]). This difference was not substantiated in multivariable models (OR=0.74, 95% CI [0.40-1.31]). CONCLUSION: Patients with public insurance received less subspecialty consultation compared to privately insured patients despite a similarity in the presentation and characteristics of their facial lacerations. The reasons for these disparities require further investigation.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Faciais/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Lacerações/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicare/economia , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
11.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 12(9): 803-11, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25176460

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Germany population-based data on health care of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are rare. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between socio-demographic and regional factors, health insurance status and clinical features of BCC. METHODS: Data base was from a nationwide dermatopathology laboratory. All consecutive excisions from 2010 were analyzed regarding tumor-specific and socioeconomic characteristics of BCC. RESULTS: 9,467 histologically verified BCC derived from 7,116 patients (54.1 % male, mean age 70 years) were analyzed. 33 % of patients had multiple tumors. The average vertical depth of invasion of BCC was 1.27 mm. It was increased significantly (p ≤ 0.001) in men (1.33 mm vs. 1.19 mm in women) and in persons over 70 years of age (1.36 mm vs. 1.14 mm). Controlled for age and sex, members of agricultural health-insurances (LKK) and of German local public health insurances (AOK) showed the highest tumor depths (1.45 mm resp.1.42 mm). The lowest depths (1.17 mm) were found in insurees of the substitute health funds (Ersatzkassen) (p ≤ 0.001). Vertical depth of invasion was significantly increased for patients living in rural counties (1.34 mm) compared to patients from urban areas (1.21 mm). Furthermore, the distribution of BCC locations varied by type of health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Area of residence, health insurance status, age and gender are relevant determinants of BCC health care in Germany. Prevention programs and activities to improve early detection by health insurances should take this into account.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Distribuição por Idade , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores Socioeconômicos
12.
NCHS Data Brief ; (138): 1-8, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24352196

RESUMO

KEY FINDINGS: Data from the National Health Interview Survey, 2012. In the 12 months prior to interview, 2.4% of people in the U.S. had problems finding a general doctor, 2.1% had been told that a doctor would not accept them as new patients, and 2.9% had been told that a doctor did not accept their health care coverage. People under age 65 who had public coverage only were more likely than those with private insurance to have these three types of adverse experiences with physician availability. Adults aged 18-64 who were uninsured were more likely than privately insured adults to have trouble finding a general doctor or be told that a doctor would not accept them as new patients. Adults aged 65 and over with Medicare only were as likely as those with both Medicare and private insurance to have these experiences with physician availability. Rates of private insurance and public coverage have been increasing (1,2). As coverage and utilization increase, a growing concern is the availability of health care providers to meet patient needs (3). Almost 90% of general physicians accept new patients with private insurance, but less than 75% accept new patients with public coverage (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid), and the proportion of specialists accepting new patients with Medicare or Medicaid is declining (4). While most studies approach access from a provider perspective, this report examines the percentage of people who had each of three adverse experiences with physician availability in the past 12 months. Estimates were produced by age group and health insurance status using data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/provisão & distribuição , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Entrevistas como Assunto , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
14.
NCHS Data Brief ; (119): 1-8, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23742848

RESUMO

In 2011, Americans spent $45 billion out-of-pocket on retail prescription drugs (1). Some adults reduce prescription drug costs by skipping doses and delaying filling prescriptions (2). Some cost-reduction strategies used by adults have been associated with negative health outcomes. For example, adults who do not take prescription medication as prescribed have been shown to have poorer health status and increased emergency room use, hospitalizations, and cardiovascular events (3,4). This report analyzes different strategies used by U.S. adults to reduce their prescription drug costs, by age, health insurance status, and poverty status, using data from the 2011 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Terapias Complementares/economia , Terapias Complementares/estatística & dados numéricos , Redução de Custos/métodos , Financiamento Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
15.
AIDS Care ; 25(11): 1470-6, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23517139

RESUMO

There is evidence that earlier initiation of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) is associated with better outcomes, including lower morbidity and mortality. Based on recent studies indicating that Medicaid enrollees are more likely to have suboptimal access to medical care, we hypothesized that HIV severity at time of ART initiation is worse for Medicaid patients than patients with other health care coverage. We conducted a US retrospective analysis of GE Centricity Outpatient Electronic Medical Records spanning 1 January 1997 through 30 September 2009. Subjects included all adult HIV patients initiating first-line ART who had CD4+ results within 90 days pre-initiation. HIV stage was defined using CD4 ranges: >500 (n=520), 351-500 (n=379), 201-350 (n=580), or ≤200 (n=406) cells/mm(3), with lower CD4 count being indicative of increased disease severity. Payer type was defined as the patient's primary payer: Medicaid, Medicare, commercial insurance, self-pay or other/unknown. After controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, cumulative logit models assessed the effect of payer type on HIV stage at ART initiation. The study included 1885 subjects with the primary payer being Medicaid (n=218), Medicare (n=330), commercial insurance (n=538), self-pay (n=159) or other/unknown (n=640). Final logit models demonstrated that, compared to patients on Medicaid, the odds of initiating ART at a higher CD4 range were significantly greater for those commercially insured (odds ratio [OR]=1.53; P=0.005), self-paying (OR=1.56; P=0.023) and other/unknown (OR=1.79; P<0.001) and similar for patients enrolled in Medicare (OR=1.11; P=0.521). Medicaid patients initiated ART at a more advanced stage of HIV than patients who were commercially insured, self-paying, or had other/unknown coverage. With HIV treatment guidelines now supporting ART initiation in patients with higher CD4 counts, these findings underscore the need for mitigating barriers, particularly in the Medicaid population, that may delay treatment initiation.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Medicaid/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Estudos de Coortes , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/normas , Masculino , Medicaid/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Ann Agric Environ Med ; 19(3): 593-9, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23020063

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: As landowners occupied with agricultural production comprise a sizeable part of the populations in mid- and western European countries, it seemed reasonable to assess the organization of health care systems concerning farmers and their families in Poland and Germany. Both countries have similar geographical conditions and rural environments. It so happens that in Poland the principles of the system of agricultural insurance (KRUS) is based on the experiences of Germany and France. STATE OF KNOWLEDGE: Basically, both in Poland and Germany, the agricultural health insurance companies provide the same insurance cover as other health insurance companies. In both countries, under certain conditions, in the case of illness, the insured farmers receive instead of sickness benefit operational assistance and home help. In spite of the similarities that characterize both administrations, many particular differences are to be noted, e.g. the farmers' social insurance in Poland is subject to only one ministry, in contrast to Germany where two ministries are responsible for farmers' social insurance. In Poland, KRUS is a monopolistic organization, whereas in Germany, nine similar independent structures fulfil the task of a health insurance company. Needless to say, many more funds are available for prevention, treatment and rehabilitation in Germany than in Poland, due to obvious differences in the overall national income.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Cobertura do Seguro/organização & administração , Seguro Saúde/organização & administração , Previdência Social/organização & administração , Alemanha , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Seguro por Deficiência/classificação , Seguro por Deficiência/economia , Seguro por Deficiência/organização & administração , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/classificação , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/economia , Polônia , Previdência Social/classificação , Previdência Social/economia
17.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 12: 208, 2012 Jul 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22818296

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limited financial and geographic access to primary care can adversely influence chronic disease outcomes. We examined variation in awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia according to both geographic and financial access to care. METHODS: We analyzed data on 17,458 participants in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study with either hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes and living in either complete Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) counties or non-HPSA counties in the U.S. All analyses were stratified by insurance status and adjusted for sociodemographics and health behaviors. RESULTS: 2,261 residents lived in HPSA counties and 15,197 in non-HPSA counties. Among the uninsured, HPSA residents had higher awareness of both hypertension (adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.08, 4.89) and hyperlipidemia (adjusted OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.01, 2.22) compared to non-HPSA residents. Also among the uninsured, HPSA residents with hypertension had lower blood pressure control (adjusted OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29, 0.71) compared with non-HPSA residents. Similar differences in awareness and control according to HPSA residence were absent among the insured. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar or higher awareness of some chronic diseases, uninsured HPSA residents may achieve control of hypertension at lower rates compared to uninsured non-HPSA residents. Federal allocations in HPSAs should target improved quality of care as well as increasing the number of available physicians.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias , Hipertensão , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Masculino
18.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 31(6): 1339-48, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22623614

RESUMO

The Affordable Care Act creates state-based health exchanges that will begin acting as a market place for health insurance plans and consumers in 2014. This paper compares the financial protection offered by today's group and individual plans with the standards that will apply to insurance sold in state-based exchanges. Some states may apply these standards to all health insurance sold within the state. More than half of Americans who had individual insurance in 2010 were enrolled in plans that would not qualify as providing essential coverage under the rules of the exchanges in 2014. These people were enrolled in plans with an actuarial value below 60 percent, which means that the plans covered less than that proportion of the enrollees' health expenses. Many of today's individual health plans are below the "bronze" level, the lowest level of plan that can be sold through exchanges. In contrast, most group plans in 2010 had an actuarial benefit of 80-89 percent and would qualify as highly rated "gold" plans in the exchanges. To sell to ten million new buyers on the exchanges, insurers will need to redesign benefit packages. Combined with a ban on medical underwriting, the individual insurance market in a post-health reform world will sharply contrast with the market of past decades.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro/organização & administração , Seguro Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estados Unidos
19.
Am J Public Health ; 102(5): 877-83, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22420816

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We estimated associations between payer status, race/ethnicity, and acceptance of nontargeted opt-out rapid HIV screening in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We analyzed data from a prospective clinical trial between 2007 and 2009 at Denver Health. Patients in the ED were offered free HIV testing. Patient demographics and payer status were collected, and we used multivariable logistic regression to estimate associations with HIV testing acceptance. RESULTS: A total of 31,525 patients made 44, 765 unique visits: 40% were White, 37% Hispanic, 14% Black, 1% Asian, and 7% unknown race/ethnicity. Of all visits, 10 ,237 (23%) agreed to HIV testing; 27% were self-pay, 23% state-sponsored, 18% Medicaid, 13% commercial insurance, 12% Medicare, and 8% another payer source. Compared with commercial insurance patients, self-pay patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.51, 1.75), state-sponsored patients (OR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.52, 1.77), and Medicaid patients (OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.14, 1.34) had increased odds of accepting testing. Compared with White patients, Black (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.21, 1.38) and Hispanic (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.11, 1.23) patients had increased odds of accepting testing. CONCLUSIONS: Many ED patients are uninsured or subsidized through government programs and are more likely to consent to free rapid HIV testing.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/etnologia , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos
20.
JAMA ; 304(6): 664-70, 2010 Aug 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20699458

RESUMO

CONTEXT: The potential effects of increasing numbers of uninsured and underinsured persons on US emergency departments (EDs) is a concern for the health care safety net. OBJECTIVE: To describe the changes in ED visits that occurred from 1997 through 2007 in the adult and pediatric US populations by sociodemographic group, designation of safety-net ED, and trends in ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Publicly available ED visit data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 1997 through 2007 were stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status, safety-net hospital classification, triage category, and disposition. Codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), were used to extract visits related to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Visit rates were calculated using annual US Census estimates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total annual visits to US EDs and ED visit rates for population subgroups. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2007, ED visit rates increased from 352.8 to 390.5 per 1000 persons (rate difference, 37.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], -51.1 to 126.5; P = .001 for trend); the increase in total annual ED visits was almost double of what would be expected from population growth. Adults with Medicaid accounted for most of the increase in ED visits; the visit rate increased from 693.9 to 947.2 visits per 1000 enrollees between 1999 and 2007 (rate difference, 253.3; 95% CI, 41.1 to 465.5; P = .001 for trend). Although ED visit rates for adults with ambulatory care-sensitive conditions remained stable, ED visit rates among adults with Medicaid increased from 66.4 in 1999 to 83.9 in 2007 (rate difference, 17.5; 95% CI, -5.8 to 40.8; P = .007 for trend). The number of facilities qualifying as safety-net EDs increased from 1770 in 2000 to 2489 in 2007. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that ED visit rates have increased from 1997 to 2007 and that EDs are increasingly serving as the safety net for medically underserved patients, particularly adults with Medicaid.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica/terapia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Masculino , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA