Histological assessment of a novel de-epithelialization method for connective tissue grafts harvested from the palate. An experimental study in cadavers.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the histological outcomes of three distinct de-epithelialization methods used in (connective tissue grafts) CTG harvested from the palate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental study using nine cadaver head specimens was carried out to compare 3 different de-epithelialization techniques for CTG. Eighteen samples were randomly allocated to three study groups: bone scraper, diamond bur and extraoral removal with a scalpel. The main outcome variable was the graft surface percentage without epithelium remains. Additionally, the time employed, and the graft thickness were also measured. RESULTS: Sixteen CTGs were analyzed. The extraoral scalpel group presented a total surface area with no epithelium of 58.84% (22.68) and a mean de-epithelialization time of 3.7 min; the intraoral diamond bur group had 88.24% (41.3) of the surface with no epithelium and took 1.455 min, and the intraoral bone scraper showed 97.98% (5.99) of surface without epithelium and a mean time of 0.815 min (P < 0.05). Histological analysis showed significant differences between the bone scraper and the extraoral group (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The de-epithelialization technique with a bone scraper seems to be the most effective and fastest de-epithelialization technique for CTG. These findings need to be confirmed in future clinical studies with larger samples. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of bone scrapers, could be a simple, effective and fast technique to de-epithelialize connective tissue grafts harvested from the palatal area for both novice and experienced surgeons.

Outcomes and Cost Comparison of 3 Different Laparoscopic Approach for Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis of 551 Cases.

BACKGROUND: At our institution, we switched from hand-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HRN) to hand-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HTN); we later switched to standard retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (SRN). This study was performed to evaluate outcomes and hospital costs among the 3 techniques. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, single-center, inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis study compared the outcomes among 551 cases of living donor kidney transplantation between 2014 and 2022. RESULTS: After the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, there were 114 cases in the HRN group, 204 cases in the HTN group, and 213 cases in the SRN group. Donor complication rates were lowest in the SRN group but did not differ between the HRN and HTN groups (1.1 vs 4.4 and 5.9%, P = .021). Donors in the SRN group had the lowest serum C-reactive protein concentrations on postoperative day 1 (4.3 vs 10.5 and 7.8 mg/dL, P < .001) and the shortest postoperative stay (4.3 vs 7.4 and 8.4 days, P < .001). Donors in the SRN group had the lowest total cost among the 3 groups (8868 vs 9709 and 10,592 USD, P < .0001). Donors in the SRN group also had the lowest costs in terms of "basic medical fees," "medication and injection fees," "Intraoperative drug and material costs," and "testing fees." Furthermore, the presence of complications was significantly correlated with higher total hospital costs (P < .001). CONCLUSION: SRN appeared to have the least invasive and complication, and a potential cost savings compared with the HRN and HTN.

Economic Evaluation of Endoscopic vs Open Vein Harvesting.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic vein harvesting is an alternative to open vein harvesting during coronary artery bypass grafting. Although endoscopic vein harvesting includes significant clinical benefits, few long-term cost-effectiveness studies have been performed, limiting its use in the United Kingdom. In this study, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic vein harvesting compared with open vein harvesting from the United Kingdom's National Health Service perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic vein harvesting vs open vein harvesting by investigating the incremental lifetime costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained. A scoping literature review was conducted to inform the development of the model. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses examined the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Compared with open vein harvesting, endoscopic vein harvesting leads to cost savings of £68.46 and quality-adjusted life-year gains of 0.206 per patient over a lifetime perspective. Thus, endoscopic vein harvesting is a dominant treatment option over open vein harvesting (net monetary benefit: £6248.46). In the scenario analysis, which accounted for a high-risk population with respect to leg wound infections, the net monetary benefit was £7341.47. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that endoscopic vein harvesting has a 62.3% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, highlighting uncertainties resulting from follow-up event rates. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic vein harvesting is a cost-effective method of harvesting a saphenous vein graft. Further clinical data beyond 5 years of follow-up are required to confirm the long-term cost-effectiveness.

The Morality of Kidney Sales: When Caring for the Seller's Dignity Has Moral Costs.

Kidney markets are prohibited in principle because they are assumed to undermine the seller's dignity. Considering the trade-off between saving more lives by introducing regulated kidney markets and preserving the seller's dignity, we argue that it is advisable to demand that citizens restrain their own moral judgements and not interfere with the judgements of those who are willing to sell a kidney. We also argue that it is advisable not only to limit the political implications of the moral argument of dignity concerns toward a market-based solution but also to re-evaluate the dignity argument itself. First, if the dignity argument is to be given normative force, it must also consider the dignity violation of the potential transplant recipient. Second, there seems to be no compelling notion of dignity that demonstrates why it is morally permissible to donate but not to sell a kidney.

Cost-effectiveness of locally prepared Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts in Edmonton.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to show the cost-effective benefits of creating a sustainable local program where Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts were prepared locally instead of imported from American eye banks. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: In 2018, 2 local technicians were trained to prestrip DMEK grafts in Edmonton up to 2 days before surgery when local donor tissue was available. When no local tissue was available, prestripped DMEK grafts were imported from U.S. eye banks. The total cost of locally prepared and imported DMEK grafts over 27 months was compared with the cost that otherwise would have been accrued if all DMEK grafts had been imported. RESULTS: Over 27 months, 82 DMEK grafts (55.3%) were prepared locally and 63 DMEK grafts (44.7%) were imported. The total cost of preparing 82 grafts locally was $9349.19. The total cost of importing 63 prestripped DMEK grafts was $282 431.52. The combined total cost of locally prepared and imported DMEK grafts was $291 780.71. The total cost that otherwise would have been incurred if every graft was imported was $632 108.64. This difference in costs was $340 327.93 over 27 months. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing a sustainable program to make high-quality DMEK grafts with local donor corneas is a cost-effective alternative to importing prestripped DMEK grafts in Edmonton.

Indocyanine green clearance test in liver transplantation: defining cut-off levels for graft viability assessment during organ retrieval and for the prediction of post-transplant graft function recovery - the Liver Indocyanine Green (LivInG) Trial Study Protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Viability assessment of the graft is essential to lower the risk of liver transplantation (LT) failure and need for emergency retransplantation, however, this still relies mainly on surgeon's experience. Post-LT graft function recovery assessment is also essential to aid physicians in the management of LT recipients and guide them through challenging decision making.This study aims to trial the use of indocyanine green clearance test (IGT) in the donor as an objective tool to assess graft viability and in the recipient to assess graft function recovery after LT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an observational prospective single-centre study on consecutive liver transplant donors and recipients. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine the capability of IGT of predicting graft viability at the time of organ retrieval. Indocyanine green will be administered to the donor and the plasma disappearance rate (PDR) measured using the pulsidensitometric method. Some 162 IGT donor procedures will be required (α, 5%; ß, 20%) using an IGT-PDR cut-off value of 13% to achieve a significant discrimination between viable and non-viable grafts. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: IGT-PDR will be measured at different time-points in the LT recipient: during the anhepatic phase, after graft reperfusion, at 24 hours, on day 3 and day 7 after LT. The slope of IGT values from the donor to the recipient will be evaluated for correlation with the development of early allograft dysfunction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research protocol was approved by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Ethics Committee (reference number: 0048466/20, study ID: 3656) and by the Italian National Transplant Center (CNT) (reference number: Prot.11/CNT2021). Liver recipients will be required to provide written informed consent. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented in congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05228587.

Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Conduit Harvesting Technique Using a Non-Sealed System for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Objective: Endoscopic vessel harvest (EVH) is evolving as the standard of care for coronary artery bypass grafting. However, the increase in upfront equipment-related costs has resulted in reluctance of uptake globally. We investigated the costs involving a non-sealed technique for EVH versus open vessel harvesting techniques (OVH) for both the greater saphenous vein and radial artery with a 6-month follow-up. Methods: From September 2016 to December 2018, 226 patients underwent OVH while 251 patients underwent EVH using a reusable non-sealed system and a single-use radiofrequency sealing system. Cumulative costs for OVH versus EVH were calculated as a summation of total operative and in-hospital stay costs. Costs related to harvest site complication management were also analyzed for up to 6 months. Results: Total operative costs were greater in the EVH group (Can$2,283.70 [Can$1,377.60 to $4,183.50] vs Can$1,742.40 [Can$998.50 to $3,628.10], P < 0.001). Total length of stay was significantly shorter for the EVH group (5.9 [4 to 43] days vs 6.8 [4 to 55] days, P = 0.018). Cumulative costs were comparable at the end of the hospitalization period (EVH, Can$6,534.70 [Can$2,076.50 to $33,087.70] vs OVH, Can$6,112.50 [Can$3,322.30 to $45,503.50], P = 0.06). After discharge, harvest site-related complications occurred more frequently in the OVH group (27% vs 4.4%, P < 0.001), resulting in increased use of antibiotics (2.2% vs 0.8%, P = 0.02) as well as more frequent requirement for home nursing assistance in the OVH group (5.7% vs 0.8%, P = 0.002) at 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Cumulative costs did not show a statistical difference between OVH and EVH, with higher intraoperative costs for EVH being offset by higher harvest site management costs in the OVH group.

Costs of Endoscopic vs Open Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Secondary Analysis of the REGROUP Trial.

Importance: Value-based purchasing creates pressure to examine whether newer technologies and care processes, including new surgical techniques, yield any economic advantage. Objective: To compare health care costs and utilization between participants randomized to receive endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) or open vein harvesting (OVH) during a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary economic analysis was conducted alongside the 16-site Randomized Endo-Vein Graft Prospective (REGROUP) clinical trial funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program. Adults scheduled for urgent or elective bypass involving a vein graft were eligible. The first participant was enrolled in September 2013, with most sites completing enrollment by March 2014. The last participant was enrolled in April 2017. A total of 1150 participants were randomized, with 574 participants receiving OVH and 576 receiving EVH. For this secondary analysis, cost and utilization data were extracted through September 30, 2020. Participants were linked to administrative data in the VA Corporate Data Warehouse and activity-based cost data starting with the index procedure. Interventions: EVH vs OVH, with comparisons based on intention to treat. Main Outcomes and Measures: Discharge costs for the index procedure as well as follow-up costs (including intended and unintended events; mean [SD] follow-up time, 33.0 [19.9] months) were analyzed, with results from different statistical models compared to test for robustness (ie, lack of variation across models). All costs represented care provided or paid by the VA, standardized to 2020 US dollars. Results: Among 1150 participants, the mean (SD) age was 66.4 (6.9) years; most participants (1144 [99.5%] were male. With regard to race and ethnicity, 6 participants (0.5%) self-reported as American Indian or Alaska Native, 10 (0.9%) as Asian or Pacific Islander, 91 (7.9%) as Black, 62 (5.4%) as Hispanic, 974 (84.7%) as non-Hispanic White, and 6 (0.5%) as other race and/or ethnicity; data were missing for 1 participant (0.1%). The unadjusted mean (SD) costs for the index CABG procedure were $76 607 ($43 883) among patients who received EVH and $75 368 ($45 900) among those who received OVH, including facility costs, insurance costs, and physician-related costs (commonly referred to as provider costs in Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and insurance data). No significant differences were found in follow-up costs; per 90-day follow-up period, EVH was associated with a mean (SE) added cost of $302 ($225) per patient. The results were highly robust to the statistical model. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, EVH was not associated with a reduction in costs for the index CABG procedure or follow-up care. Therefore, the choice to provide EVH may be based on surgeon and patient preferences. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01850082.

The importance of kidney volume as a marker in the assessment of living-donor kidney transplantation in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In living kidney transplantation, predicting the risk of end-stage kidney disease in the organ donors though crucial remains to be resolved. Thus, any useful biomarker to predict kidney outcome would be highly desirable to safeguard donors. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital to confirm whether an increase in preserved kidney volume (PKV) was a predict marker of proteinuria. A change of PKV before and 1 year after kidney donation was measured, and its association with proteinuria 3 years after the donation was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 119 kidney donors who met the Japanese donor guideline were enrolled. The mean age was 57.4 years, 46.2% were male. The mean values of the variables before kidney donation (baseline) were: BMI levels: 23.4 kg/m2, BSA-adjusted PKV: 132.9 cm3/1.73 m2, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRave): 82.9 mL/min/1.73 m2. A positive correlation was noted between BSA-adjusted PKV and eGFRave (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). BSA-adjusted PKV increased by 19.5% 1 year after donation, and the median urine protein was 0.04 g/gCre. Linear regression analyses showed that change of PKV and BSA-adjusted PKV before the donation were significantly associated with proteinuria 3 years after donation. CONCLUSION: Change of PKV and BSA-adjusted PKV before donation is important factors for proteinuria after donation under the Japanese donor guidelines. Further studies are needed to confirm whether these factors are associated with renal survival after donation.

Assessment of National Organ Donation Rates and Organ Procurement Organization Metrics.

Importance: Organ transplant is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage organ failure. In the US, organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are responsible for the evaluation and procurement of organs from donors who have died; however, there is controversy regarding what measures should be used to evaluate their performance. Objective: To evaluate OPO performance metrics using combined mortality and donation data and quantify the associations of population demographics with donation metrics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national cohort study includes data from the US organ transplantation system from January 2008 through December 2017. All individuals who died within the US, as reported by the National Death index, were included. Exposures: Death, organ donation, and donation eligibility. Main Outcomes and Measures: Evaluation of the variation in donation metrics and the use of ineligible donors by OPO and demographic subgroup. Results: This study included 17 501 742 deaths and 75 769 deceased organ donors (45 040 men [59.4%]; 51 908 White individuals [68.5%]). Of these donors, 15 857 (20.9%) were not eligible, as defined by the OPOs. The median donation metrics by OPO were 0.004 (range, 0.002-0.012) donors per death, 0.89 (range, 0.68-1.30) donors per eligible death, and 0.72 (range, 0.57-0.86) eligible donors per eligible death. The OPOs in the upper quartile of the overall eligible donors per eligible death metric were in the upper quartile of annual rankings on 90 of 140 occasions (64.3%). There was little overlap in top-performing OPOs between metrics; an OPO in the upper quartile for 1 metric was also in the upper quartile for the other metrics on 37 of 570 occasions (6.5% of the time). The median donor eligibility rate, defined as the number of eligible donors per donor, was 0.79 (range, 0.61-0.95) across OPOs. Age (eg, 65 to 84 years, coefficient, -0.55 [SE, 0.03]; P < .001; vs those aged 18 to 34 years), sex (male individuals, -0.09 [SE, 0.02]; P < .001; vs female individuals), race (eg, Black individuals, 0.35 [SE, 0.02]; P < .001; vs White individuals), cause of death (eg, central nervous system tumor, 0.48 [SE, 0.08]; P < .001; vs anoxia), year (eg, 2016-2017: -0.10 [SE, 0.03]; P < .001; vs 2008-2009), and OPO were associated with the use of ineligible donors; OPO was a significant factor associated with performance in all metrics (χ256, 500.5; P < .001; coefficient range across individual OPOs, -0.15 [SE, 0.09] to 0.75 [SE, 0.09]), even after accounting for population differences. Female and non-White individuals were significantly less likely to be used as ineligible donors. Conclusions and Relevance: We demonstrate significant variability in OPO performance rankings, depending on which donation metric is used. There were significant differences in OPO performance, even after accounting for differences in potential donor populations. Our data suggest significant variation in use of ineligible donors among OPOs, a source for increased donors. The performance of OPOs should be evaluated using a range of donation metrics.

SARS-CoV-2: Impact on, Risk Assessment and Countermeasures in German Eye Banks.

INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic there has been some debate regarding the risk of transmission through tissue transplantation and tissue banking processes. AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyze the changes that SARS-CoV-2 has caused regarding the harvesting of corneal donor tissue and eye bank activities in Germany. METHODS: A questionnaire was provided to 26 eye banks in Germany, consisting of questions about adaptations made in the screening of potential donors and the harvesting of corneal tissue following the pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Eighteen eye banks actively reduced recruitment of donors and two banks ceased all activity. Additional diagnostic screening was performed in eight banks, using conjunctival swabs and/or nasopharyngeal swabs. In six eye banks, additional protective measures, such as FFP2 masks and/or facial shields, were implemented. Overall, a mean reduction in the number of obtained donor tissues of 17% was observed. DISCUSSION: Conjunctival and/or nasopharyngeal swabs of donors have been implemented by a minority. Reasons for not performing additional tests may be moderate sensitivity and lack of validation for postmortem use of RT-PCR testing. Also, the hazard of SARS-CoV-2 entering the corneal donor pool with subsequent transmission might be perceived as theoretical. Face shields provide a sufficient barrier against splash and splatter contamination but may be insufficient against aerosols. Additional face masks would provide support against aerosols, but it remains debatable if corneal harvesting can be considered an aerosol-producing procedure. In the future we expect to see changes in current guidelines because of a surge in scientific activities to improve our understanding of the risks involved with cornea donation in the COVID-19 pandemic, and because current practice may reduce the availability of donor corneas due to new exclusion criteria while the demand remains unchanged.

Assessment of the right ventricle in donation after circulatory death hearts.

In donation after circulatory death heart transplantation, the donor heart is exposed to circulatory load. The right ventricle, due to its structure, has high compliance for volume load but is particularly vulnerable to increased pressure load. This study used a porcine model to conduct a functional assessment of the hemodynamics of the heart, with a focus on the right ventricle. Six pigs weighing 24.6 ± 1.4 kg were used. Circulatory death was induced by asphyxiation after median sternotomy. After 30 minutes in the state of global warm ischemia, the ascending aorta was clamped, followed by a 20-minute reperfusion of the heart with a 20°C blood cardioplegia solution. Systemic circulation was established by cardiopulmonary bypass after aortic cross-clamping. After initial reperfusion, the blood cardioplegia solution was replaced with blood. The blood was then rewarmed while the heart was still in a non-working state. Cardiac function was assessed twice in situ, first by the thermodilution method, and then, by the pressure-volume measurement both at preischemia and at three hours after initiation of reperfusion. The recovery rate of cardiac output was 75%. End-systolic elastance (P = .02) and pulmonary arterial elastance significantly increased (P = .03), but the ratio of arterial elastance to end-systolic elastance was preserved (P = .91) in the right ventricle. Despite a decrease in cardiac output after reperfusion from warm ischemia, the right ventricle had a potential to respond the elevated afterload. It is important that donations after circulatory death heart transplantation should be performed with attention to avoiding right ventricular distension.

Reproducibility of Non-Invasive Endothelial Cell Loss Assessment of the Pre-Stripped DMEK Roll After Preparation and Storage.

PURPOSE: To present a novel, reproducible, and noninvasive method to quantify endothelial cell loss (ECL) of pre-stripped endothelial Descemet membrane lamellae (EDML) caused by its preparation and storage for 5 days. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory investigation. METHODS: Thirty EDML were stripped from corneoscleral discs and placed in a well plate containing organ culture medium 1 without dextran. An additional 5 corneoscleral discs were also placed in the same medium and served as a control group. Endothelial cell density (ECD) was measured without any additional manipulation by using spectral microscopy following an extensive protocol by which 3 clear images from the center and periphery were used for each measurement, and each measurement was repeated 5 times. ECD was measured before and directly after preparation and on days 1, 2, and 5 of storage. RESULTS: The average ECD of the 30 corneoscleral discs, which later underwent stripping, was 2,292 ± 308 cells/mm2 vs 2,129 ± 222 cells/mm2 for the 5 corneoscleral discs of the control group. The ECL of the control group was significantly lower than that of the EDML group (P < .0001), reaching ±2% versus 11 ± 5%, respectively, on day 0; 3% ± 4% versus 19 ± 10%, respectively, on day 1; 2% ± 2% versus 22% ± 11%, respectively on day 2; and 4% ± 3% versus 23% ± 9%, respectively, on day 5. Reproducibility of the results on all measurement days was good, with Cronbach alpha values ranging from 0.85 to 0.98. CONCLUSIONS: A highly reproducible, noninvasive method was presented for measuring the ECD of the EDML. Prestripped EDML lose a significant amount of cells, up to 11%, due to the preparation process and up to 23% after 5 days of storage. Therefore, shipping them after several days of storage to be used in a DMEK surgery cannot be recommended.