Longitudinal changes of the femoral bone mineral density from first to third trimester of pregnancy: bone health assessment by means of non-ionizing REMS technology.

BACKGROUND: Throughout the pregnancy, there is a substantial transfer of calcium from the maternal skeleton to the fetus, which leads to a transient net reduction of the maternal bone mineral density. AIMS: To assess longitudinally the changes in the bone mineral density at the femoral neck between the first and third trimester of pregnancy in a cohort of healthy participants using Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) technology. METHODS: Prospective, cohort study conducted at the University hospital of Parma, Italy between July 2022 and February 2023. We recruited healthy participants with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy before 14 completed weeks of gestation. All included participants were submitted to a sonographic examination of the femoral neck to assess the bone mineral density (and the corresponding Z-score values) using REMS at 11-13 and 36-38 weeks of pregnancy. The primary outcome was the change in the bone mineral density values at the maternal femoral neck between the first and third trimester of pregnancy. RESULTS: Over a period of 7 months, a total of 65 participants underwent bone mineral density measurement at the femoral neck at first and third trimester of the pregnancy using REMS. A significant reduction of the bone mineral density at the femoral neck (0.723 ± 0.069 vs 0.709 ± 0.069 g/cm2; p < 0.001) was noted with a mean bone mineral density change of - 1.9 ± 0.6% between the first and third trimester of pregnancy. At multivariable linear regression analysis, none of the demographic or clinical variables of the study population proved to be independently associated with the maternal bone mineral density changes at the femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS: Our study conducted on a cohort of healthy participants with uncomplicated pregnancy demonstrates that there is a significant reduction of bone mineral density at femoral neck from early to late gestation.

An Imaging Assessment of the Femoral Neck-shaft Angle in Adult Bengali Bangladeshi Population.

Most orthopaedics implants were designed and manufactured based on data from the Western population whose skeletal dimensions are different from the Bengali Bangladeshi population. This study aims to determine the value of the femoral neck-shaft angle of the adult Bengali Bangladeshi population for adequate planning, preparation and pre-operative selection of orthopaedic implants for surgeries involving the femoral neck and stocking of orthopaedic implants. This was a cross-sectional analytical study which involved measuring the femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) from the pelvic radiographs anterior-posterior view of adult patients reported "normal study" by the registered radiologist. This study was carried out in the Department of Anatomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh from March 2019 to February 2020. A total of 200 femoral neck-shaft angles were analyzed from 100 patients' radiographs comprising 50 males and 50 females. The average NSA of adult Bengali Bangladeshi is 128.74°±5.83° with a mean value of 128.68°±6.20° for the right and 128.81°±5.66° for the left. The mean value of NSA is 129.64°±5.90° and 127.85°±5.64° in adult males and females respectively. The femoral neck-shaft angle in adult Bengali Bangladeshi males was significantly higher than the females.

Application of intelligent X-ray image analysis in risk assessment of osteoporotic fracture of femoral neck in the elderly.

The paper focuses on establishing a risk assessment model of femoral neck osteoporotic fracture (FNOF) in the elderly population and improving the screening efficiency and accuracy of such diseases in specific populations. In literature research, the main risk factors of femoral neck osteoporosis (FNOP) in the elderly were studied and analyzed; the femur region of interest (ROI) and the hard bone edge segmentation model were selected from the X-ray digital image by using the image depth learning method. On this basis, the femoral trabecular score and femoral neck strength (FNS) in the set region were selected as the main evaluation elements, and the quantitative analysis method was established; an X-ray image processing method was applied to the feasibility study of FNOP and compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density; Finally, the main risk factors of FNOP were selected and the prediction model of FNOP in the elderly population was established based on medical image processing, machine learning model construction and other methods. Some FNOP health records were selected as test samples for comparative analysis with traditional manual evaluation methods. The paper shows the risk assessment model of FNOF in the elderly population, which is feasible in testing. Among them, the artificial neural network model had a better accuracy (95.83%) and recall rate (100.00%), and the support vector machine prediction model had high specificity (62.50%). With the help of a machine learning method to establish the risk assessment model of FNOF for the elderly, one can provide decision support for the fracture risk assessment of the elderly and remind the clinic to give targeted interventions for the above high-risk groups in order to reduce the fracture risk.

Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS): an innovative technique for the assessment of bone status in young women with anorexia nervosa.

PURPOSE: Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and increase risk of fragility fracture are common complication of anorexia nervosa (AN). BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) present several limits in subjects with AN. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the new Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) technique in the assessment of bone status in young women with AN. METHODS: In a cohort of 50 subjects with restrictive AN and in 30 healthy controls, we measured BMD at the lumbar spine (LS-BMD), at femoral neck (FN-BMD) and total hip (TH-BMD) using both DXA and REMS technique. RESULTS: BMD evaluated by DXA and REMS technique at all measurement sites were all significantly (p < 0.01) lower in subjects suffering from AN subjects than in controls. Good correlations were detected between BMD by DXA and BMD by REMS measurements at LS (r = 0.64, p < 0.01) at FN (r = 0.86, p < 0.01) and at TH (r = 0.84, p < 0.01) in subjects suffering from AN. Moreover, Bland-Altman analysis confirmed the good agreement between the two techniques. The subjects suffering from AN with previous vertebral fragility fractures presented lower values of both BMD-LS and BMD-TH by DXA and by REMS with respect to those without fractures; however, the difference was significant only for BMD-TH by REMS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that REMS technique due to its characteristic of precision and reproducibility may represent an important tool for the evaluation of the changes in bone status in AN young women, especially during the fertile age and in case of pregnancy and breastfeeding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence: level III cohort study.

Assessment of bone mineral density and bone metabolism in young men with obstructive sleep apnea: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients during sleep may have an effect on bone metabolism. Few data regarding evaluation of bone metabolism in young individuals diagnosed with OSA. In this study, we aim to identify the association between bone mineral density and OSA in young men (≤ 40 years old of age). METHODS: Consecutive male subjects who underwent polysomnography were enrolled. Serum calcium, 25-hydroxyvitamin-D3, ß-isomerized form C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, osteocalcin and procollagen type 1 N-propeptide were measured in all participants, and bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and hip total were determined by dual energy X-ray absorption (DXA). RESULTS: The population consisted of 85 subjects (mean age 35.53 years). The BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4) in moderate OSA patients was higher than control and severe OSA group significantly (p = 0.036). After adjustment for confounding factors, stepwise multiple linear regression analyses showed LaSO2 (ß = 0.340, p = 0.008) as an independent explanatory variable for Lumbar L1-L4 BMD, LaSO2 (ß = 0.304, p = 0.037), BMI (ß = 0.393, p = 0.008) for femur neck BMD and BMI (ß = 0.720, p = 0.002) for hip total BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding indicated that there was a relationship between OSA and bone metabolism in younger men, and moderate OSA-related hypoxia positively related with BMD. This study also showed that different degrees of recurrent hypoxia had different effects on bone metabolism, a finding that required further investigation.

In Vivo Comparison of Backscatter Techniques for Ultrasonic Bone Assessment at the Femoral Neck.

Ultrasonic techniques are being developed to detect changes in cancellous bone caused by osteoporosis. The goal of this study was to test the relative in vivo performance of eight backscatter parameters developed over the last several years for ultrasonic bone assessment: apparent integrated backscatter (AIB), frequency slope of apparent backscatter (FSAB), frequency intercept of apparent backscatter (FIAB), normalized mean of the backscatter difference (nMBD), normalized slope of the backscatter difference (nSBD), normalized intercept of the backscatter difference (nIBD), normalized backscatter amplitude ratio (nBAR) and backscatter amplitude decay constant (BADC). Backscatter measurements were performed on the left and right femoral necks of 80 adult volunteers (age = 25 ± 11 y) using an imaging system equipped with a convex array transducer. For comparison, additional ultrasonic measurements were performed at the left and right heel using a commercially available heel-bone ultrasonometer that measured the stiffness index. Six of the eight backscatter parameters (all but nSBD and nIBD) exhibited similar and highly significant (p < 0.000001) left-right correlations (0.51 ≤ R ≤ 0.68), indicating sensitivity to naturally occurring variations in bone tissue. Left-right correlations for the stiffness index measured at the heel (R = 0.75) were not significantly better than those produced by AIB, FSAB and FIAB. The short-term precisions of AIB, nMBD, nBAR and BADC (7.8%-11.7%) were comparable to that of the stiffness index measured with the heel-bone ultrasonometer (7.5%).

The outcome of an automated assessment of trabecular pattern in intraoral radiographs as a fracture risk predictor.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate if automated analyses of the trabecular pattern in intraoral radiographs independently contribute to fracture risk assessment when other risk factors incorporated in the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) are taken into account. A secondary aim is to explore the correlation between the automated trabecular pattern assessment in intraoral radiographs and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS). METHODS: A total of 567 intraoral radiographs from older females participating in a large population-based study (SUPERB) based in Gothenburg, Sweden, were selected to analyse trabecular pattern using semi-automated and fully automated software. Associations between trabecular pattern analysis and incident fractures were studied using Cox proportional hazard model, unadjusted and adjusted for FRAX risk factors (previous fracture, family history of hip fracture, smoking, corticosteroids, rheumatoid arthritis, without and with bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck). In addition, the correlation between trabecular pattern analysis and TBS of the lumbar spine was investigated using Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS: Neither the unadjusted nor the adjusted trabecular pattern analysis in intraoral radiographs was significantly associated with any fracture or major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). A weak correlation was found between semi-automated trabecular pattern analysis and TBS. No correlation was found between the fully automated trabecular pattern analysis and TBS. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that semi-automated and fully automated digital analyses of the trabecular pattern in intraoral radiographs do not contribute to fracture risk prediction. Furthermore, the study shows a weak correlation between semi-automated trabecular pattern analysis and TBS.

Does hip structural analysis confer additional benefit to routine BMD assessment in postmenopausal women with hip fracture? A study from a tertiary center in southern India.

This study from southern India showed that proximal hip geometry was significantly impaired in postmenopausal women with femoral neck fracture. The trabecular bone score (TBS), which is reflective of bone microarchitecture, was also significantly impaired in patients with fracture. INTRODUCTION: There is limited information with regard to comprehensive bone health in Indian postmenopausal women with neck of femur fracture. We studied the bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), proximal hip geometry, and bone mineral biochemistry in postmenopausal women with and without femoral neck fractures. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care center in South India. BMD, TBS, and hip structural analysis (HSA) were assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Bone mineral biochemical profiles were also studied. RESULTS: A total of 90 postmenopausal women with acute femoral neck fracture with mean (SD) age of 63.2 (6.1) years and 90 age-matched controls were included. The prevalence of osteoporosis was higher among cases as compared to controls (83.3% vs 47.8%; P < 0.001). Degraded bone microarchitecture (TBS value < 1.200) was more frequent among women with hip fracture as compared to controls (46.7% vs 31.1%; P = 0.032). Cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) was significantly lower at the narrow neck (NN) and inter-trochanteric (IT) region in cases (P < 0.05) and buckling ratio (BR) was significantly higher at all three sites in postmenopausal women with femoral neck fracture as compared controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that femoral neck osteoporosis, low CSMI at NN and high BR at NN and femoral shaft emerged as factors significantly associated with femoral neck fractures. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that impaired parameters of proximal hip geometry and a low trabecular bone score may be significantly associated with femoral neck fractures in postmenopausal women.

Assessment of total and regional bone mineral density using bioelectrical impedance vector analysis in elderly population.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and height-adjusted resistance (R/H), reactance (Xc/H) and phase angle (PhA). A total of 61 male and 64 female subjects aged over 60 years were recruited from middle Taiwan. The R and Xc were measured using Bodystat Quadscan 4000 at a frequency of 50 kHz. BMD at the whole body, L2-L4 spine, and dual femur neck (DFN), denoted as BMDTotal, BMDL2-L4, and BMDDFN, were calculated using a Hologic DXA scanner. The R-Xc graph was used to assess vector shift among different levels of BMD. BMD was positively correlated with Xc/H and negatively correlated with R/H (p < 0.001). The General Linear Model (GLM) regression results were as follows: BMDTotal = 1.473-0.002 R/H + 0.007 Xc/H, r = 0.684; BMDL2-L4 = 1.526-0.002 R/H + 0.012 Xc/H, r = 0.655; BMDDFN = 1.304-0.002 R/H + Xc/H, r = 0.680; p < 0.0001. Distribution of vector in the R-Xc graph was significantly different for different levels of BMDTotal, BMDL2-L4 and BMDDFN. R/H and Xc/H were correlated with BMD in the elderly. The linear combination of R/H and Xc/H can effectively predict the BMD of the whole body, spine and proximal femur, indicating that BIVA may be used in clinical and home-use monitoring tool for screening BMD in the elderly in the future.

Assessment of Bone Mineral Density in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis; An Iranian Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a condition in which bone turnover and metabolism is impaired; thus, osteoporosis and low bone density are subsequently inevitable. We aimed to determine bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers, and associated factors in hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: Patients aged 30-70 years undergoing HD between 2015 to 2019 were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. BMD measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and biochemical laboratory tests were assessed in 200 patients undergoing HD. Statistical analysis was based on t test, Pearson, regression and Mann-Whitney tests using SPSS 16. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were investigated. Sixty percent of the patients were female. Mean ± SD of participants' age was 58.6 (±11.63) years and mean ± SD for duration of HD was 45.69 (± 43.76) months. Osteoporosis was found in 48% (n=96) and low bone density in 36% (n=76) of our patients. General osteoporosis was more frequent in those undergoing HD for more than 3 years, although not significantly (P=0.093, odds ratio [OR]=0.37). However, regional osteoporosis in hip and femoral neck, but not spine vertebrae, were significantly higher after three years of HD (P=0.036, OR=0.27; P=0.042, OR=0.27; and P=0.344, OR=0.56, respectively). Increased body mass index (BMI) correlated negatively with osteoporosis (P=0.050). CONCLUSION: With increasing age and duration of HD, BMD decreases. Higher BMI was associated with higher bone mass density. Bone density assessment seems to be necessary in patients undergoing HD.

Spine-Hip Discordance and FRAX assessment Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia from Concordant Diagnosis Between Lumbar Spine and Femoral Neck.

The diagnostic criteria proposed by the World Health Organization did not consider the discrepancy in diagnosis between lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) and the clinical implications is unclear. Therefore, this retrospective study evaluated the probability of fracture risk in postmenopausal women with lumbar spine (LS)-femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) discordance or not Patients included 1066 healthy postmenopausal women (median age 55.5 years) who visited our hospital for a health check-up between May 2013 and April 2017. Discordance was defined as a difference of one or two degrees between LS BMD and FN BMD. TBS was calculated from dual energy absorptiometry (DXA) images. Fracture risk was assessed using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), including TBS-adjusted FRAX Seven hundred and two patients (65.9%) showed concordant LS and FN results, whereas 364 patients (34.1%) exhibited discordance. Normal BMD was found in 519 concordant patients (73.9%). Concordant patients showed significantly higher FRAX scores, including TBS-adjusted FRAX results, than discordant patients with low LS or FN. Furthermore, FRAX results in concordant osteopenia patients were similar to that of osteoporosis patients with osteopenia or a normal result at one site. FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX results in concordant osteopenia patients were comparable to that of discordant osteoporosis patients We concluded that patients with colncordant osteopenia in both the FN and LS should be managed in a similar way to patients with discordant osteoporosis.

Bone Material Strength Index as Measured by Impact Microindentation is Low in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

CONTEXT: In primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) bone mineral density (BMD) is typically decreased in cortical bone and relatively preserved in trabecular bone. An increased fracture rate is observed however not only at peripheral sites but also at the spine, and fractures occur at higher BMD values than expected. We hypothesized that components of bone quality other than BMD are affected in PHPT as well. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bone material properties using impact microindentation (IMI) in PHPT patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the Bone Material Strength index (BMSi) was measured by IMI at the midshaft of the tibia in 37 patients with PHPT (28 women), 11 of whom had prevalent fragility fractures, and 37 euparathyroid controls (28 women) matched for age, gender, and fragility fracture status. RESULTS: Mean age of PHPT patients and controls was 61.8 ±â€…13.3 and 61.0 ±â€…11.8 years, respectively, P = .77. Calcium and PTH levels were significantly higher in PHPT patients but BMD at the lumbar spine (0.92 ±â€…0.15 vs 0.89 ±â€…0.11, P = .37) and the femoral neck (0.70 ±â€…0.11 vs 0.67 ±â€…0.07, P = .15) were comparable between groups. BMSi however was significantly lower in PHPT patients than in controls (78.2 ±â€…5.7 vs 82.8 ±â€…4.5, P < .001). In addition, BMSi was significantly lower in 11 PHPT patients with fragility fractures than in the 26 PHPT patients without fragility fractures (74.7 ±â€…6.0 vs 79.6 ±â€…5.0, P = .015). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that bone material properties are altered in PHPT patients and most affected in those with prevalent fractures. IMI might be a valuable additional tool in the evaluation of bone fragility in patients with PHPT.

Statistical quantification of hip radiograph assessment using Shenton line femur neck length ratio.

INTRODUCTION: Identification of a poorly positioned hip radiograph often requires a subjective assessment by the radiographer, which, due to the observer dependency of this method, may have conflicting opinions between radiographers. A quantitative approach may be a better personnel independent approach for assessing an optimally positioned hip radiograph. A Shenton line length femur neck length ratio (SLFLR) could be used to achieve this, which is the aim of this study. METHODS: Seventy-three (48 digital and 25 analog) optimally positioned non-pathological hip radiographs of asymptomatic patients aged between 20 and 59 years and reported by the consultant radiologist as normal were conveniently selected. Three different radiographers, each blinded to the results of the other two, measured the Shenton line length and the femur neck length with the aid of flexible and straight meter rules for the analog images and inbuilt electronic calipers for the digital images. Bland-Altman method of agreement was used to assess for reproducibility and reliability of the measurements while the 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles of the SLFLR were computed. RESULTS: The mean ± SD SLFLR for both genders were 1.07 ± 0.08 cm (females: 1.06 ± 0.09 and males: 1.08 ± 1.07 cm). The measurements demonstrated high reproducibility and reliability between (interclass correlation coefficient: 0.993) and within (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.998) radiographers. The 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentile values of the SLFLR are 0.90, 1.03, 1.12, and 1.18. CONCLUSION: For a hip radiograph to be reported as optimal for patients aged 20-59 years, the SLFLR should be between 0.90 and 1.18. This method is highly reproducible and repeatable and could be adopted for quantitative assessment of radiographs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The SLFLR could be used as an additional tool by the radiographer to quantitatively assess for a well-positioned hip radiograph.

Assessment of femoral neck strength and bone mineral density changes following exercise using 3D-DXA images.

Physical exercise induces spatially heterogeneous bone changes in the proximal femur. Recent advances have enabled 3D dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)-based finite element (FE) models to estimate bone strength. However, its ability to detect exercise-induced BMD and strength changes is unclear. The aim of this study was to quantify the repeatability of vBMD and femoral neck strength obtained from 3D-DXA images and determine the changes due an exercise intervention. The DXA scans included pairs of same-day repeated scans from ten healthy females and pre- and post-exercise intervention scans of 26 males. FE models with element-by-element correspondence were generated by morphing a template mesh to each bone. BMD and femoral strength under single-leg-stance and sideways fall loading configurations were obtained for both groups and compared. In the repeated images, the total hip vBMD difference was 0.5 ± 2.5%. Element-by-element BMD differences reached 30 ± 50%. The strength difference in single-leg stance was 2.8 ± 13% and in sideways fall was 4.5% ± 19%. In the exercise group, strength changes were 6 ± 19% under single-leg stance and 1 ± 18% under sideways fall. vBMD parameters were weakly correlated to strength (R2 < 0.31). The exercise group had a mean bone accrual exceeding repeatability values in the femoral head and cortical regions. The case with the highest vBMD change (6.4%) caused 18% and -7% strength changes under single-leg stance and sideways fall. 3D-DXA technology can assess the effect of exercise interventions in large cohorts but its validity in individual cases should be interpreted with caution.

Preoperative bone health assessment and optimization in spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the bone health in preoperative spine surgery patients. This information will provide a framework to understand the needs and methods for providing bone health optimization in elective spine surgery patients. METHODS: A retrospective study of 104 patients undergoing bone health optimization was performed. Patients were selected based on risk factors identified by the surgeon and suspected compromised bone health. Evaluation included history and examination, laboratory investigations, and bone mineral density (BMD) at 3 sites (femoral neck, lumbar spine, and radius). Patients' bone status was classified using WHO criteria and expanded criteria recommended by the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF). The 10-year Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores of the hip and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) were calculated with and without femoral neck BMD, with spine BMD, and with the trabecular bone score (TBS). Antiresorptive and anabolic agents were provided in accordance with meeting NOF criteria for treatment of osteoporosis. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 69.0 years, and 81% of patients were female. The mean historical height loss was 5.6 cm, and 54% of patients had a history of fracture. Secondary osteoporosis due to chronic renal failure, inflammatory arthritis, diabetes, and steroid use was common (51%). The mean 25-hydroxy vitamin D was 42.4 ng/ml and was normal in 81% of patients, with only 4 patients being deficient. The mean T-scores were -2.09 (SD 0.71) of the femoral neck, -0.54 (1.71) of the lumbar spine, and -1.65 (1.38) of the distal radius. These were significantly different. The 10-year FRAX MOF score was 20.7%, and that for hip fracture was 6.9% using the femoral neck BMD and was not significantly different without the use of BMD. The FRAX risk-adjusted score using the lumbar spine BMD and TBS was significantly lower than that for the hip. Osteoporosis was present in 32.1% according to WHO criteria compared with 81.6% according to NOF criteria. Antiresorptive medications were recommended in 31 patients and anabolic medications in 44 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons can reliably identify patients with poor bone health by using simple criteria, including historical height loss, history of fracture, comorbidities associated with osteoporosis, analysis of available imaging, and calculation of FRAX score without BMD. High-risk patients should have BMD testing and bone health assessment. In patients with osteoporosis, a comprehensive preoperative bone health assessment is recommended and, if warranted, pharmacological treatment should be started.

Impact of spine-hip discordance on fracture risk assessment and treatment qualification in Canada: the Manitoba BMD registry.

In 50,330 women undergoing bone mineral density (BMD) testing, adjusting FRAX® major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) probability for T-score differences between lumbar spine and femoral neck had a small impact on treatment qualification, with only 1.1% reclassified from below to above the 20% MOF intervention threshold. PURPOSE: Discordance between lumbar spine and femoral neck T-score measurements are frequently encountered in clinical practice. The FRAX tool accepts femoral neck BMD as an optional input but does not consider lumbar spine BMD, though adjustments based upon T-score difference have been proposed. This analysis was undertaken to examine change in treatment qualification using the lumbar spine T-score adjustment to FRAX assuming an intervention threshold of 20% MOF. METHODS: Women aged > 50 years with baseline FRAX MOF probability computed with femoral neck BMD of ≥ 20% but without previous high-risk fracture or high-risk medication use were identified in the province of Manitoba BMD registry. If lumbar spine T-score was lower than the femoral neck T-score, MOF probability was recalculated, and treatment qualification, reassessed. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 50,300 women (mean age 64.2 ± 8.6 years). During mean follow-up of 9.5 years, 4550 sustained incident MOF. The baseline mean T-score difference (femoral neck minus lumbar spine) was - 0.2 ± 1.1. Recalculated MOF probability using the T-score difference significantly improved overall net reclassification index for incident MOF prediction (+ 0.017, p < 0.001). A total of 561 (1.1%) of these women were reclassified from below to above 20% MOF probability based upon the T-score difference. No individuals with MOF probability less than 15% were reclassified to the higher risk category. Risk reclassification increased with lower lumbar spine T-score (15.6% reclassification for lumbar spine T-score of - 3.5 or lower, 4.0% of the study population) and larger T-score differences (9.7% reclassification for T-score difference of 2.5 or more, < 1% of the study population). CONCLUSIONS: Very few women showed risk reclassification based upon adjusting FRAX MOF probability for lumbar spine T-score. Reclassification occurred only in those with baseline MOF probability > 15%.

Assessment of femoral neck bone metabolism using 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT imaging.

BACKGROUND: Standard of care metabolic bone disease assessment relies on changes to bone quantity, which can only be detected after structural changes occur. PURPOSE: To investigate the usefulness of Bone Metabolism Score (BMS), derived from fluorine 18 labeled sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET/CT imaging as a biomarker of localized metabolic changes at the femoral neck. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 139 participants (68 females and 71 males, ages 21-75 years) that had undergone 18F-NaF PET/CT were included. BMS was calculated as the ratio of standard uptake value (SUV) in the bone region to that of the total region. Correlations and linear regressions of BMS with age, CT-derived bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), height, and weight were conducted. Differences in BMS between women younger and older than the age of 50 years were assessed. Inter- and intra-operator reproducibility was evaluated by coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Among females, age was negatively correlated with left and right whole BMS (5.61% and 4.90% drop in BMS per decade of life) and left and right cortical BMS (10.50% and 10.09% drop in BMS per decade of life). BMS of women older than 50 years was lower than BMS of women younger than 50 years (P < .0001). Among males, age was negatively correlated with left and right whole BMS (4.29% and 4.25% drop in BMS per decade of life) and left and right cortical BMS (9.13% and 10.30% drop in BMS per decade of life). BMD was positively correlated with whole (r = 0.80, P < .0001) and cortical (r = 0.92, P < .0001) BMS. CONCLUSIONS: BMS could provide functional insight regarding bone metabolism in the femoral neck to complement bone health status assessed through conventional structural imaging. The methodology described herein could be potentially useful for assessing hip fracture risk in individuals when BMD tests provide borderline determination of bone disease.

Assessment of the young adult hip joint using plain radiographs.

Radiographic examination remains the mainstay of the initial assessment of the young adult hip; however, common parameters are required to assist in the formation of accurate diagnoses and appropriate management plans. This paper aims to summarise the most important aspects of the assessment of plain radiographs performed on the young adult hip joint.

Bone marrow fat fraction assessment in regard to physical activity: KORA FF4-3-T MR imaging in a population-based cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the effect of different degrees and kinds of physical activity on bone marrow fat (BMAT) content at different anatomical locations in a population-based cohort study undergoing whole-body MR imaging. METHODS: Subjects of the KORA FF4 study without known cardiovascular disease underwent BMAT fat fraction (FF) quantification in L1 and L2 vertebrae and femoral heads/necks (hip) via a 2-point T1-weighted VIBE Dixon sequence. BMAT-FF was calculated as mean value (fat image) divided by mean value (fat + water image). Physical activity was determined by self-assessment questionnaire regarding time spent exercising, non-exercise walking, non-exercise cycling, and job-related physical activity. RESULTS: A total of 385 subjects (96% of 400 available; 56 ± 9.1 years; 58% male) were included in the analysis. Exercise was distributed quite evenly (29% > 2 h/week; 31% ~ 1 h/week (regularly); 15% ~ 1 h/week (irregularly); 26% no physical activity). BMAT-FF was 52.6 ± 10.2% in L1, 56.2 ± 10.3% in L2, 87.4 ± 5.9% in the right hip, and 87.2 ± 5.9% in the left hip (all p < 0.001). Correlation of BMAT-FF between spine and hip was only moderate (r 0.42 to 0.46). Spinal BMAT-FF, but not hip BMAT-FF, was inversely associated with exercise > 2 h/week (p ≤ 0.02 vs. p ≥ 0.35, respectively). These associations remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, waist circumference, and glucose tolerance. No coherent association was found between BMAT-FF and physical activity in the less active groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, exercise was inversely correlated with vertebral BMAT-FF, but not hip BMAT-FF, when exercising for more than 2 h per week. Physical activity seems to affect the spine at least preferentially compared to the hip. KEY POINTS: • In our population-based cohort, at least 2 h of physical activity per week were required to show lower levels of bone marrow adipose tissue fat fraction in MRI. • Physical activity seems to affect bone marrow adipose tissue at least preferentially at the spine in contrast to the proximal femur.

Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry along with bone mineral density in the evaluation of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

This is a cross-sectional study to look at the utility of DXA-VFA in addition to bone mineral density (BMD) in the evaluation of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral fracture (VF) was detected in more than two-thirds of postmenopausal women referred for DXA-BMD. Addition of DXA-VFA detected additional 27% with VF whose BMD were in the non-osteoporotic range. INTRODUCTION: VFs are the hallmark of osteoporotic fractures. Prevalent vertebral fractures are an independent risk factor for future fragility fractures. This study was conducted to look at the prevalence of VF by DXA-vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and to study the utility of DXA-VFA in addition to bone mineral density (BMD) in the evaluation of osteoporosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of the postmenopausal women above the age of 50 years who were referred for BMD assessment by DXA. All subjects underwent VFA and BMD assessment by Hologic DXA. RESULTS: Four hundred postmenopausal women with a mean age of 62.7 ± 6.2 years underwent BMD and VFA assessment by DXA. Prevalent VF was seen in 261 (65.2%) subjects, of which 114 (28.5%) subjects, 135 (33.7%) subjects, and 12 (3%) subjects had mild, moderate, and severe VF, respectively. Among subjects with VF, 136 (52.1%) and 90 (34.5%) had BMD-defined osteoporosis at the spine and femur neck, respectively. Overall, 59% with VF had osteoporosis at either the spine or femur neck. Forty-one-percent subjects with VF had BMD in non-osteoporotic range at both sites, of which 20% had moderate-to-severe VF. Addition of DXA-VFA to BMD assessment detected additional 27% with VF whose BMD was in the non-osteoporotic range. CONCLUSION: VF was seen in more than two-thirds of the postmenopausal women referred for osteoporosis evaluation. VFA identified additional patients with VF whose BMD was not in the osteoporotic range. Incorporation of VFA to BMD will assist in documenting prevalent vertebral fracture which is an independent risk factor for incident fragility fracture irrespective of the BMD.