Assessment of the Frequency, Phenotypes, and Outcomes of Acute Liver Injury Associated with Amoxicillin/Clavulanate in 1.4 Million Patients in the Veterans Health Administration.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced liver injury is a significant health issue, yet the exposure-based incidence remains to be characterized. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the frequency, phenotypes, and outcomes of acute liver injury associated with amoxicillin/clavulanate using a large electronic health record system. METHODS: Using the Veterans Health Administration electronic health record system, we developed the framework to identify unexplained acute liver injury, defined by alanine aminotransferase and/or alkaline phosphatase elevation temporally linked to prescription records of amoxicillin/clavulanate, a major culprit of clinically significant drug-induced liver injury, excluding other competing causes. The population was subcategorized by pre-existing liver conditions and inpatient status at the time of exposure for the analysis. RESULTS: Among 1,445,171 amoxicillin/clavulanate first exposures in unique individuals [92% men; mean age (standard deviation): 59 (15) years], 6476 (incidence: 0.448%) acute liver injuries were identified. Of these, 4427 (65%) had alternative causes, yielding 2249 (incidence: 0.156%) with unexplained acute liver injuries. The incidence of unexplained acute liver injury was lowest in outpatients without underlying liver disease (0.067%) and highest in inpatients with pre-existing liver conditions (0.719%). Older age, male sex, and American Indian or Alaska Native (vs White) were associated with a higher incidence of unexplained acute liver injury. Cholestatic injury affected 74%, exhibiting a higher frequency with advanced age, inpatient exposure, and pre-existing liver conditions. Hepatocellular injury with bilirubin elevation affected 0.003%, with a higher risk at age >45 years. During a 12-month follow-up, patients with unexplained acute liver injury had a higher adjusted overall mortality risk than those without evident acute liver injury. CONCLUSIONS: This framework identifies unexplained acute liver injury following drug exposure in large electronic health record datasets. After validating in other systems, this framework can aid in deducing drug-induced liver injury in the general patient population and regulatory decision making to promote drug safety and public health.

A novel quantitative computer-assisted drug-induced liver injury causality assessment tool (DILI-CAT).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We hypothesized that a drug's clinical signature (or phenotype) of liver injury can be assessed and used to quantitatively develop a computer-assisted DILI causality assessment-tool (DILI-CAT). Therefore, we evaluated drug-specific DILI-phenotypes for amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMX/CLA), cefazolin, cyproterone, and Polygonum multiflorum using data from published case series, to develop DILI-CAT scores for each drug. METHODS: Drug specific phenotypes were made up of the following three clinical features: (1) latency, (2) R-value, and (3) AST/ALT ratio. A point allocation system was developed with points allocated depending on the variance from the norm (or "core") for the 3 variables in published datasets. RESULTS: The four drugs had significantly different phenotypes based on latency, R-value, and AST/ALT ratio. The median cyproterone latency was 150 days versus < 43 days for the other three drugs (median: 26 for AMX/CLA, 20 for cefazolin, and 20 for Polygonum multiflorum; p<0.001). The R-value for the four drugs was also significantly different among drugs (cyproterone [median 12.4] and Polygonum multiflorum [median 10.9]) from AMX/CLA [median 1.44] and cefazolin [median 1.57; p<0.001]). DILI-CAT scores effectively separated cyproterone and Polygonum multiflorum from AMX/CLA and cefazolin, respectively (p<0.001). As expected, because of phenotypic overlap, AMX/CLA and cefazolin could not be well differentiated. CONCLUSIONS: DILI-CAT is a data-driven, diagnostic tool built to define drug-specific phenotypes for DILI adjudication. The data provide proof of principle that a drug-specific, data-driven causality assessment tool can be developed for different drugs and raise the possibility that such a process could enhance causality assessment methods.

Comparative Effectiveness and Harms of Antibiotics for Outpatient Diverticulitis : Two Nationwide Cohort Studies.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient diverticulitis is commonly treated with either a combination of metronidazole and a fluoroquinolone (metronidazole-with-fluoroquinolone) or amoxicillin-clavulanate alone. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration advised that fluoroquinolones be reserved for conditions with no alternative treatment options. The comparative effectiveness of metronidazole-with-fluoroquinolone versus amoxicillin-clavulanate for diverticulitis is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and harms of metronidazole-with-fluoroquinolone versus amoxicillin-clavulanate for outpatient diverticulitis. DESIGN: Active-comparator, new-user, retrospective cohort studies. SETTING: Nationwide population-based claims data on U.S. residents aged 18 to 64 years with private employer-sponsored insurance (2000 to 2018) or those aged 65 years or older with Medicare (2006 to 2015). PARTICIPANTS: Immunocompetent adults with diverticulitis in the outpatient setting. INTERVENTION: Metronidazole-with-fluoroquinolone or amoxicillin-clavulanate. MEASUREMENTS: 1-year risks for inpatient admission, urgent surgery, and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and 3-year risk for elective surgery. RESULTS: In MarketScan (IBM Watson Health), new users of metronidazole-with-fluoroquinolone (n = 106 361) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (n = 13 160) were identified. There were no differences in 1-year admission risk (risk difference, 0.1 percentage points [95% CI, -0.3 to 0.6]), 1-year urgent surgery risk (risk difference, 0.0 percentage points [CI, -0.1 to 0.1]), 3-year elective surgery risk (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points [CI, -0.3 to 0.7]), or 1-year CDI risk (risk difference, 0.0 percentage points [CI, -0.1 to 0.1]) between groups. In Medicare, new users of metronidazole-with-fluoroquinolone (n = 17 639) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (n = 2709) were identified. There were no differences in 1-year admission risk (risk difference, 0.1 percentage points [CI, -0.7 to 0.9]), 1-year urgent surgery risk (risk difference, -0.2 percentage points [CI, -0.6 to 0.1]), or 3-year elective surgery risk (risk difference, -0.3 percentage points [CI, -1.1 to 0.4]) between groups. The 1-year CDI risk was higher for metronidazole-with-fluoroquinolone than for amoxicillin-clavulanate (risk difference, 0.6 percentage points [CI, 0.2 to 1.0]). LIMITATION: Residual confounding is possible, and not all harms associated with these antibiotics, most notably drug-induced liver injury, could be assessed. CONCLUSION: Treating diverticulitis in the outpatient setting with amoxicillin-clavulanate may reduce the risk for fluoroquinolone-related harms without adversely affecting diverticulitis-specific outcomes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Azithromycin and Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether short-term use of azithromycin increases the risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in adults with uncomplicated infections. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using Medicaid claims data, 1999 to 2010. PATIENTS: Adults (18-64 years old) who had continuous enrollment in Medicaid for the 12 months (baseline) before the date of first dispensation (index date) of oral azithromycin or amoxicillin ±â€Šclavulanate for uncomplicated infections. MAIN OUTCOME DEFINITION: We operationalized sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) by a charge for audiometry and followed by a diagnosis of SNHL within 30 days. ANALYSIS: We adjusted for the baseline covariates through propensity score matching. Adults were followed for up to 120 days after the index date. The hazard of SNHL in azithromycin-exposed adults was compared with those who had amoxicillin ±â€Šclavulanate using a Cox proportional hazard model. We performed several sensitivity analyses by varying the follow-up time, SNHL definition, adjusting for cumulative antibiotic use, and switching exposure status during the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 493,774 patients entered the study cohort. The unadjusted incidence rates of SNHL were 38 and 41 cases per 10,000 patient-years following exposure to azithromycin and amoxicillin ±â€Šclavulanate, respectively. The adjusted (matched) hazard ratio (HR) of SNHL for azithromycin versus amoxicillin ±â€Šclavulanate was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.07). The sensitivity analyses findings were consistent with the primary analysis. CONCLUSION: Azithromycin short-term use was not associated with an increased risk of SNHL in comparison to amoxicillin ±â€Šclavulanate.

[Infectious exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prospects for high-dose levofloxacin therapy].

This open comparative randomized study of efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic characteristics of hilifox-750 (750 mg daily for 5 days) and amoxiclav 2X (875/125 mg twice daily for 10 days) included 60 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Duration of the study was 6 months. Medians of age and smoking index in the group treated with hilifox-750 were 63.5 yr (59, 67) and 30 packs/yr (15, 60) respectively. The treatment reduced cough, apnea, sputum volume and pyoptysis with comparative rates of normalization of body temperature and peripheral leukocyte counts in both groups. Helifox-750 promoted decrease in coughing and apnea within the first three days of therapy. 28 (93%) and 26 (87%) patients recovered by day 4 of helifox and amoxiclav therapy (F-test p = 0.67). Both drugs showed comparable bacteriological efficacy. They were not different in terms of side effect frequency that were mild, resolved spontaneously and did not require withdrawal of therapy. Helifox had advantages over amoxiclav in that it reduced duration of antibacterial therapy to 5 days and of temporary incapacity to 12 days (vs 14); moreover, it needs to be taken only once daily.

Patient stratification in the management of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: the role of levofloxacin 750 mg.

This is the first prospective clinical trial in which patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis have been stratified by degree of underlying illness. Uncomplicated patients were randomised to levofloxacin 750 mg once daily (q.d.) for 3 days or azithromycin q.d. for 5 days. Complicated patients were randomised to levofloxacin 750 mg q.d. for 5 days or amoxicillin 875 mg/clavulanate 125 mg twice daily for 10 days. Regardless of therapy, complicated patients demonstrated lower clinical and microbiological success than uncomplicated patients. Clinical success for clinically evaluable patients was similar for levofloxacin and azithromycin (93.0 versus 90.1%, respectively), and levofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate (79.2 versus 81.7%, respectively). For microbiologically evaluable patients, clinical response to levofloxacin for 3 days was superior to azithromycin for 5 days (96.3 versus 87.4%, respectively), and levofloxacin for 5 days was similar to amoxicillin/clavulanate for 10 days (81.4 versus 80.9%, respectively). Microbiological eradication was superior for levofloxacin for 3 days compared with azithromycin for 5 days (93.8 versus 82.8%, respectively), and similar for levofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate for 10 days (81.4 versus 79.8%, respectively). In conclusion, levofloxacin 750 mg for 3 days was comparable to azithromycin for 5 days for uncomplicated patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, while 5 days of 750 mg levofloxacin was comparable to 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

[The clinical and economic efficacies of short courses of azithromycin in acute sinusitis]. / Klinicheskaia i ékonomicheskaia éffektivnost' korotkikh kursov azitromitsina pri ostrom sinusite.

A randomized study of a 3-day course of azithromycin therapy (500 mg once daily) vs. a 10-day course of co-amoxiclav therapy (625 mg thrice daily) in patients with acute sinusitis was performed with an account of the GCP criteria. One hundred patients in 2 groups each of 50 persons were enrolled. The estimates of the patient body temperature, headache, pain on palpation in the area of the accessory nasal sinuses, nasal cavity stuffing, nasal discharge nature and the nose mucous membrane appearance were recorded prior to the treatment, in 72 hours and on the 10th-12th and 26th-30th days of the treatment. The microbiological analysis of the punctate from the accessory nasal sinuses was undertaken before the antibiotic therapy and 72 hours after its start. The economic analysis included the cost of the antibiotic therapy course, hospitalization term, medical manipulations and laboratory tests as well as the cost/efficacy index. The frequency of the relapses within 6 months after the cure was estimated in the two groups compared. In 72 hours and on the 10th-12th days after the treatment start the efficacy of azithromycin was significantly higher than that of co-amoxiclav. The cure was stated in 41 (82 per cent) and 26 (52 per cent) patients on the 10th-12th days, in 6 (12 per cent) and 21 (42 per cent) patients the improvement was stated and the fail was stated in 3 (6 per cent) and 2 (4 per cent) patients respectively. The efficacy of the drugs on the 26th-30th days after the treatment start did not differ. The isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes were the main pathogens. The bacteriologic eradication was recorded in 29 (90.6 per cent) patients treated with azithromycin and only in 18 (69.2 per cent) patients treated with co-amoxiclav. Adverse reactions and relapses of the disease within 6 months after the cure were more frequent in the patients treated with co-amoxiclav. The cost of the azithromycin therapy was significantly lower. It was shown that the shortened course of the azithromycin therapy provided earlier cure of the patients with acute sinusitis, better tolerance of the drug, less frequent adverse reactions, lower cost as compared to the use of co-amoxiclav and no relapses.