Assessment-based management of placenta-mediated pregnancy complications: Pragmatism until a precision medicine approach evolves.

The management of pregnant women with thrombophilia and a history of gestational vascular complications remains debatable. Treatment of the latter is often based on clinical outcome rather than disease mechanism. While the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in pregnancy is recommended for those at increased risk, the ability of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agents to lower the risk of placenta-mediated complications in this clinical setting remains controversial. The available guidelines are inconsistent in some situations, which reflects the limited evidence base. This review critically discusses risk assessment models (RAMs) and management strategies of women with thrombophilia and pregnancy complications, using clinical vignettes. RAMs, taking into account obstetric and thrombotic history as well as thrombophilia status, could drive a precision medicine approach, based on disease mechanism, and guide individual therapeutic interventions in high-risk clinical settings.

Applying reflective multicriteria decision analysis to understand the value of therapeutic alternatives in the management of gestational and peripartum anaemia in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the FeminFER project was to assess the value of ferric carboxymaltose following a multicriteria decision analysis in obstetrics and gynaecology in Spain. METHODS: Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) and ferrous sulphate were evaluated using the EVIDEM framework. Ten stakeholders participated to collect different perspectives. The framework was adapted considering evidence retrieved with a PICO-S search strategy and grey literature. Criteria/subcriteria were weighted by level of relevance and an evidence-based decision-making exercise was developed in each criterion; weights and scores were combined to obtain the value of intervention relative to each criterion/subcriterion, that were further combined into the Modulated Relative Benefit-Risk Balance (MRBRB). RESULTS: The most important criterion favouring FCM was Compared Efficacy/Effectiveness (0.183 ± 0.07), followed by Patient Preferences (0.059 ± 0.10). Only Direct medical costs criterion favoured FS (-0.003 ± 0.03). MRBRB favoured FCM; 0.45 ± 0.19; in a scale from -1 to + 1. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, considering the several criteria involved in the decision-making process, participants agreed with the use of FCM according to its MRBRB.

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, tolerability, and cost of oral iron preparations in iron-deficiency anemia in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and cost of four commonly prescribed oral iron preparations: ferrous sulfate (FS), ferrous fumarate (FF), ferrous ascorbate (FA), and carbonyl iron (CI) in the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) in pregnant women. METHODS: It was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) design with four parallel active control groups: FS, FF, FA, CI. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants becoming non-anemic (Hb ≥ 11 g%) at the end of the study period. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants achieving normal red blood corpuscular indices such as mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; the proportion of participants achieving normal iron indices such as serum iron, serum ferritin, total iron-binding capacity, and transferrin saturation; and comparison of incidence of any adverse events between treatment groups and comparison of costs of individual drug therapy between treatment groups. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were randomized to four different groups (n = 30). The results of the present study show that all the four iron salts at the dose of 200 mg elemental iron per day were equally effective in improving hemoglobin concentration and other hematological parameters. The adverse effects were more common in the FF group (56.7%). The pharmacoeconomic analysis showed that all the drugs are equally cost-effective. CONCLUSION: To conclude from the results of the present study, it can be said that FS, FF, FA, and CI are equally effective in treating IDA and they can be prescribed interchangeably.

Intravenous ferric derisomaltose for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia.

Intravenous (IV) iron is the therapy of choice when oral iron is ineffective or poorly tolerated, yet use has been limited by fears of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Newer formulations that bind iron more tightly and release it more slowly have made the risk of serious or severe HSRs very low. One such formulation, ferric derisomaltose, has been approved in the United States for delivery of 1000 mg iron in a single IV infusion. Ferric derisomaltose rapidly repletes iron parameters with low rates of serious or severe HSRs. Single-infusion iron repletion offers convenience, eliminates adherence concerns, and reduces healthcare resource utilization.

The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy (IDAP) affects 11-18% of Australian pregnancies and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. National prescribing data suggests the use of intravenous iron in pregnancy is increasingly common. This study aimed to: 1) Establish the current patterns of intravenous iron use by Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians (FRANZCOG) when treating iron deficiency and IDAP including immediately postpartum and; 2) Assess FRANZCOG opinions regarding potential trial of intravenous iron for first-line treatment of IDAP. METHODS: An online survey of RANZCOG Fellows practicing obstetrics was distributed in September 2018. Results were analysed descriptively and responses compared by clinician demographics using Chi-squared testing. RESULTS: Of 484 respondents (21% of FRANZCOG), 457 were currently practicing obstetrics. Most prescribed intravenous iron in pregnancy (96%) and/or postpartum (85%). Most intravenous iron was prescribed for IDAP (98%) rather than iron deficiency without anaemia (53%), and for IDAP most commonly second-line to failed oral iron supplementation and first-line in special circumstances (59%). Intravenous iron prescribing was associated with shorter time since FRANZCOG completion (p = 0.01), public hospital practice (p = 0.008) and higher hospital birth numbers (p = 0.01). Most respondents (90%) would consider a randomised controlled trial of first-line intravenous iron for IDAP, although views on appropriate thresholds differed. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all respondents prescribed intravenous iron for IDAP, and while mostly used for second-line treatment over half sometimes used it first-line. With accelerating intravenous iron use, further research is required into its optimal use in pregnancy, recognizing important clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness.

Misinterpretation of blood group and antibody screen leading to serious errors in RhD immunoglobulin administration: A report on first two years of data from Serious Transfusion Incident Reporting program.

The Serious Transfusion Incident Reporting program (STIR) commenced haemovigilance in relation to RhD immunoglobulin (Ig) administration in 2015. During two years of reporting, 21 reports relating to RhD Ig administration were received. Thirty-three percent (7/21) were related to omission of RhD Ig, putting women at risk of RhD alloimmunisation and adverse consequences in future pregnancies. A recent case reported to STIR highlights poor communication and misinterpretation of pathology results leading to significant morbidity from haemolysis in the fetus. STIR makes recommendations related to education of staff and communication between clinical and laboratory staff to improve the safety of patient care.

Assessment of liver function in pregnant anemic women upon oral iron and folic acid supplementation.

Oral iron therapy is the most widely prescribed treatment for iron deficiency anemia. However, oral iron supplementation may also lead to various health problems. The recognition of these physiological variations is essential for the diagnosis of liver diseases during the course of pregnancy. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the variations in levels of routine liver function tests (LFTs) in pregnant women before and after iron and folic acid treatment. Iron and folic acid was supplemented to 500 normal pregnant anemic women (mild=200, moderate=200 and severe=100) and 100 age matched normal pregnant non-anemic as controls daily for 100 days. Blood index values and liver function parameters were precisely monitored. Hemoglobin (Hb), total protein (TP), iron (Fe), albumin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were found increased (P<0.001; P<0.01; P<0.05) after treatment in mild, moderate, severe and control, respectively. Lipid peroxidation (LPx), aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) were increased in pretreated mild, moderate and severe groups and further increased after all treated subjects. Moreover, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) was found to decrease in pre and posttreated subjects. Treatment with iron and folic acid although has remarkable efficacy for Hb and body iron stores although for the cost of increasing the associated compartment of total bilirubin, AST and ALT concomitant with decreased GGT levels. Data obtained from the present study provide new insights into the mandatory application of liver function tests likely to be monitored at regular and specific intervals during the course of pregnancy.

Inflammation and Thrombophilia in Pregnancy Complications: Implications for Risk Assessment and Clinical Management.

In Italy, each year 500,000 couples refer to specialized centers due to reproductive problems. Among them, recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) represents a problem of great importance, given that it affects up to 5% of women of childbearing age. Infertility, on the other hand, is a condition that currently covers 10-20% of couples of reproductive age, being idiopathic in 20% of cases. Accumulating evidence support the concept that changes of blood coagulation, generically defined as the presence of a thrombophilic state (congenital or acquired), are the basis of 40-70% of cases of multiple abortions or infertility. Several evidences support the hypothesis that endothelial dysfunction, a hallmark of a condition of low-grade inflammation, is one of the earliest manifestations of thrombotic phenomena. To date, it's believed that, while the antiinflammatory Th2 cytokines (i.e. interleukin-10) can exert a protective role in pregnancy, the pro-inflammatory Th1 ones (i.e. interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α,) have deleterious effects on pregnancy outcome, including fertilization and implantation failure. Moreover, development of many pregnancy complications, first and foremost venous thromboembolism (VTE), recognizes similar mechanism(s). As VTE is the main preventable cause of mortality during pregnancy, thromboprophylaxis is mandatory according to individual VTE risk, influenced by the presence of thrombophilic conditions. In this review, we will analyze the relationship between thrombophilia and pregnancy complications, with particular focus on the role of inflammation. Subsequently, we will consider some issues related to the thromboembolic risk in pregnancy. Finally, the role of thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy will be discussed.

Screening for Iron Deficiency Anemia and Iron Supplementation in Pregnant Women to Improve Maternal Health and Birth Outcomes: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2006 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for iron deficiency anemia. METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the association between change in iron status as a result of intervention (oral supplementation or treatment) in pregnant women and adolescents and improvement in maternal and infant health outcomes. POPULATION: This recommendation applies to pregnant women and adolescents living in the United States who do not have symptoms of iron deficiency anemia. It does not address pregnant women who are malnourished, have symptoms of iron deficiency anemia, or have special hematologic conditions or nutritional needs that may increase their need for iron. RECOMMENDATIONS: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women to prevent adverse maternal health and birth outcomes. (I statement). The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of routine iron supplementation for pregnant women to prevent adverse maternal health and birth outcomes. (I statement).

Obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge of sickle cell disease screening and management.

BACKGROUND: Although obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) play an important role in sickle cell disease (SCD) screening and patient care, there is little information on knowledge of SCD or sickle cell trait (SCT) or related practices in this provider group. Our objective was to assess SCD screening and prenatal management practices among OB/GYNs. METHODS: Twelve hundred Fellows and Junior Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College)a were invited to complete a mailed survey, of which half (n = 600) belonged to the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network.b Participants answered questions regarding appropriate target patient groups for prenatal SCD screening, folic acid requirements, practice behaviors and adequacy of their medical school and residency training. RESULTS: A total of 338 CARN members (56.3%) and 165 non-CARN members (27.5%) returned a survey. Of the 503 responders, 382 provided obstetric services and were included in the analyses. Forty percent of these respondents (n = 153) reported seeing at least 1 patient with SCD in the last year. Of these, 97.4% reported regularly screening people of African descent for SCD or SCT, whereas 52.9% reported regularly screening people of Mediterranean descent and 30.1% reported regularly screening people of Asian descent. Only 56.2% knew the correct recommended daily dose of folic acid for pregnant women with SCD. The proportion of respondents that rated training on SCD screening, assessment and treatment as barely adequate or inadequate ranged from 19.7% to 39.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of many OB/GYNs who care for patients with SCD are not consistent with the College Practice Guidelines on the screening of certain target groups and on folic acid supplementation. There may be an opportunity to improve this knowledge gap through enhanced medical education.

Uso de hierro en forma de medicamento en gestantes colombianas / Pregnant Colombian females' iron in take in drug form

Objetivo Caracterizar el consumo de hierro en forma de medicamento en un grupo de embarazadas colombianas. Metodología Estudio observacional descriptivo, se obtuvo información de mujeres en control prenatal y/o atención del parto en 4 ciudades de Colombia. Las fuentes de información fueron entrevistas a gestantes y registros de historia clínica. Resultados La muestra fue de 1 637 mujeres en 15 instituciones. A 1 396 mujeres (85,3 %) les recomendaron consumir hierro, recomendación realizada por médico al 85,3 % de ellas, el 86,8 % tuvo adherencia al tratamiento. Al 84,7 % el hierro fue suministrado por la empresa aseguradora de salud, el 11,9 % lo compró a sus expensas. El 90,0 % de gestantes anémicas y el 82,8 % de las no anémicas consumieron hierro en forma de medicamento, en conjunto, en el 37,2 % de las gestantes el consumo de suplencia de hierro fue pertinente (es decir, lo necesitaban, se les recomendó y lo consumieron o no le necesitaban, no se recomendó y/o no lo consumieron). Discusión Se recomienda y se consume hierro independientemente de presentar anemia. Se invita a reflexionar sobre la utilidad de los programas que promueven el consumo masivo de esta sustancia en forma de medicamento durante el embarazo, programas que parecen desconocer las causas fundamentales de los problemas nutricionales que aquejan a la población.

Objective Describing a group of pregnant Colombian females' iron intake, in drug form. Methodology This was an observational descriptive study; information was collected in 4 Colombian cities regarding pregnant females during antenatal control or when giving birth. Information sources consisted of interviews with pregnant women and their clinical records. Results The sample consisted of 1,637 female sat tending 15 institutions. An iron intake was recommended for1, 396 women (85.3 %); a doctor made such recommendation in 85.3 % of cases and adherence was 86.8 %. Health insurance was used by 84.7 % of the females for supplying iron; 11.9 % of them bought it themselves. Iron intake as medication for anemic pregnant females was 90.0 % and 82.8 % in non-anemic ones. Iron intake supply was appropriate in 37.2 % of the pregnant females (i.e. they needed it, someone recommended it for them and they consumed it, or they didn't need it, someone didn't recommend it to them and/or they did not take it). Discussion Iron intake was recommended and consumed regardless of anemia status. The results invite to think on the usefulness of programs promoting the mass intake of iron as a medication during pregnancy. Such programs seem to be unaware of the fundamental causes of people's nutritional problems.

[Pregnant Colombian females' iron intake in drug form]. / Uso de hierro en forma de medicamento en gestantes colombianas.

OBJECTIVE: Describing a group of pregnant Colombian females' iron intake, in drug form. METHODOLOGY: This was an observational descriptive study; information was collected in 4 Colombian cities regarding pregnant females during antenatal control or when giving birth. Information sources consisted of interviews with pregnant women and their clinical records. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 1,637 females attending 15 institutions. An iron intake was recommended for 1, 396 women (85.3 %); a doctor made such recommendation in 85.3 % of cases and adherence was 86.8 %. Health insurance was used by 84.7 % of the females for supplying iron; 11.9 % of them bought it themselves. Iron intake as medication for anemic pregnant females was 90.0 % and 82.8 % in non-anemic ones. Iron intake supply was appropriate in 37.2 % of the pregnant females (i.e. they needed it, someone recommended it for them and they consumed it, or they didn't need it, someone didn't recommend it to them and/or they did not take it). DISCUSSION: Iron intake was recommended and consumed regardless of anemia status. The results invite to think on the usefulness of programs promoting the mass intake of iron as a medication during pregnancy. Such programs seem to be unaware of the fundamental causes of people's nutritional problems.

[Assessment of uterine arteries Doppler in the first half of pregnancy in women with thrombophilia]. / Ocena przeplywów krwi w tetnicach macicznych w pierwszej polowie ciazy u pacjentek z trombofilia.

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of uterine artery blood flow in women with congenital thrombophilia and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in the first half of pregnancy MATERIAL AND METHODS: Uterine arteries blood flow was assessed in a Doppler examination in 20 women with thrombophilia (15 with congenital thrombophilia, 5 with APS) at 12 and 20 weeks gestation at the Division of Reproduction, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, between 2000 and 2012 The control group consisted of 20 multiparous pregnant women with no history of pregnancy complications. All patients with thrombophilia received enoxaparin or enoxaparin and aspirin before enrollment into the study Patients from the control group did not receive any antithrombotic prophylaxis. The mean Pulsatility Index (PI) of both uterine arteries and the presence or the absence of the "notch" was assessed, both at 12 and 20 weeks gestation in each patient from the study and from the control groups. RESULTS: Mean PI values in the uterine arteries at 12 weeks in patients with thrombophilia and in controls were 1.82 (1.00-3.13) and 1.52 (1.30-1.88), respectively (p = 0.08). Mean PI value in the uterine arteries was 7.27 (0.61-2.48) in women with thrombophilia at 20 weeks, which turned out to be significantly higher (p = 0.026) than in the control group 1.07 (0.8-1.24). The bilateral "notch" was found at 12 weeks gestation in 40% of patients with thrombophilia vs. 0% in the control group (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the groups in this parameter at 20 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: 1. An increased impedance of flow was found in the uterine arteries in patients with thrombophilia at 12 and 20 weeks gestation in spite of antithrombotic prophylaxis. 2. Thrombotic episodes in patients with thrombophilia cannot be explained solely by the presence of placental thrombosis.

[Assessment of the efficacy of the Tot'hema at anaemic status with different severity in the obstetric and gynecologic practice].

Iron deficiency anaemia affect every fifth person on the planet, including the developed counties, too; the last data are that at about 700 000 000 are affected. The most common reasons for iron deficiency anemia in the obstetrics and gynecology are: pregnancy and menopause, chronic haemorrages/menorrhagiae and metrorrhagiae/dysfunctional uterine bleeding, myoma uteri, neoplastic diseases/, acute anaemias post partum and after operative interventions. The aim of the present study is to study the efficacy of the treatment of iron deficiency anemia at women with different obstetrics and gynecology pathology.

Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for RhD-negative women: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To identify any evidence for advances in the use of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) since the 2002 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) appraisal, and to assess the current clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of RAADP for Rhesus D (RhD)-negative women. DATA SOURCES: Main bibliographic databases were searched from inception to July 2007. REVIEW METHODS: Selected studies were assessed and data extracted using a standard template and quality assessment based on published criteria. Meta-analysis was used where appropriate, otherwise outcomes were tabulated and discussed within a descriptive synthesis. The health economic model developed for the 2002 NICE appraisal of RAADP was modified to assess the cost-effectiveness of different regimens of RAADP. RESULTS: The clinical effectiveness searches identified 670 potentially relevant articles. Of these, 12 papers were included in the review, relating to eight studies of clinical effectiveness. With one exception, no additional studies were identified in comparison with the previous assessment report, and some of the studies of clinical effectiveness included in the 2002 review had to be excluded because they did not use currently licensed doses. Therefore, eight studies comparing RAADP with no prophylaxis were identified in the clinical effectiveness review and nine (including the 2001 assessment report itself) in the cost-effectiveness review. The clinical efficacy studies were generally of poor quality and did not provide a basis for differentiating between regimens of RAADP. The best indication of the likely efficacy of a programme of RAADP comes from two non-randomised community-based studies. The pooled results of these suggest that such a programme may reduce the sensitisation rate from 0.95% (95% CI 0.18-1.71) to 0.35% (95% CI 0.29-0.40). This gives an odds ratio for the risk of sensitisation of 0.37 (95% CI 0.21-0.65) and an absolute reduction in risk of sensitisation in RhD-negative mothers at risk (i.e. carrying a RhD-positive child) of 0.6%. The identified studies suggest that RAADP has minimal adverse effects. Of the nine studies in the cost-effectiveness review, only two described a model that could be applicable to the NHS. The economic model modified from the 2002 appraisal suggests that the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of RAADP given to RhD-negative primigravidae versus no treatment is between 9000 pounds and 15,000 pounds, and for RAADP given to all RhD-negative women rather than to RhD-negative primigravidae only is between 20,000 pounds and 35,000 pounds depending upon the regimen. The sensitivity analysis suggests that the results are reasonably robust to changes in the assumptions within the model. CONCLUSIONS: RAADP reduces the incidence of sensitisation and hence of haemolytic disease of the newborn. The economic model suggests that RAADP given to all RhD-negative pregnant women is likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of around 30,000 pounds per QALY gained. The total cost of providing RAADP to RhD-negative primigravidae in England and Wales is estimated to be around 1.8-3.1 million pounds per year, depending upon regimen, and to all RhD-negative pregnant women in England and Wales around 2-3.5 million pounds.

Assessment and management of high-risk pregnancies in women with thrombophilia.

Pregnancy is an acquired hypercoagulable state which can lead to gestational vascular complications especially in the presence of other prothrombotic risk factors. The use of anticoagulation for prevention of pregnancy complications in women with thrombophilia is becoming more frequent. Efficacy and safety issues of therapeutic and prophylactic regimens use and monitoring of LMWH therapy in pregnancy are discussed in this review. In addition, a scoring system for women with thrombophilia is proposed which includes severity of pregnancy outcomes, thrombotic history and type of thrombophilia. Validation of this scoring system has revealed a significant correlation between the proposed score and LMWH dosages that were prescribed to the studied pregnant women. Careful diagnosis, observation and monitoring can add significant benefit to LMWH therapy during pregnancy.

Comparison of efficacy, tolerability, and cost of iron polymaltose complex with ferrous sulphate in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of iron polymaltose complex (IPC) in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) during pregnancy has not been well established, and the evidence is inconclusive. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare efficacy, safety, compliance, and cost-effectiveness of IPC with ferrous sulphate (FS) in pregnant patients. SETTINGS AND DESIGNS: The randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology in collaboration with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. METHODS: One hundred pregnant women aged 20-40 years at 14 to 27 weeks' gestation, with hemoglobin (Hb) < 9 g/dL, and serum ferritin < 12 mcg/L, were classified into 2 groups. One group received IPC (100 mg elemental iron), and the other group received FS (120 mg elemental iron) daily for 8 weeks. At Week 0 and Week 8, Hb, packed cell volume (PCV), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), serum iron, and serum ferritin were measured. Compliance with study medication was determined by pill counting at each visit. Cost minimization analysis was done to compare the costs of the 2 treatments. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data are expressed as mean -/+ SD. Paired and unpaired 't' test were used to analyze differences within groups and between groups. Chi-square (x2) test was used to analyze primary efficacy parameters and adverse drug reactions (ADR). RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in Hb, PCV, MCV, MCH, MCHC, serum iron, and serum ferritin levels were seen at the end of 8 weeks of treatment in both groups. The overall adverse effects were more common in the FS group compared with the IPC group [41 (78%) vs 15 (31%), P < .001]. The compliance rate was significantly (P < .05) higher for the IPC (91%) group than for the FS (87%) group. The average total cost (direct + indirect) of treatment of anemia was comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that IPC can be considered as a useful alternative formulation for the treatment of IDA during pregnancy for those patients who cannot tolerate other iron preparations (ferrous form); this is an important finding, as compliance is a significant concern during pregnancy.

The quantitative assessment of body iron.

Current initiatives to reduce the high prevalence of nutritional iron deficiency have highlighted the need for reliable epidemiologic methods to assess iron status. The present report describes a method for estimating body iron based on the ratio of the serum transferrin receptor to serum ferritin. Analysis showed a single normal distribution of body iron stores in US men aged 20 to 65 years (mean +/- 1 SD, 9.82 +/- 2.82 mg/kg). A single normal distribution was also observed in pregnant Jamaican women (mean +/- 1 SD, 0.09 +/- 4.48 mg/kg). Distribution analysis in US women aged 20 to 45 years indicated 2 populations; 93% of women had body iron stores averaging 5.5 +/- 3.35 mg/kg (mean +/- 1 SD), whereas the remaining 7% of women had a mean tissue iron deficit of 3.87 +/- 3.23 mg/kg. Calculations of body iron in trials of iron supplementation in Jamaica and iron fortification in Vietnam demonstrated that the method can be used to calculate absorption of the added iron. Quantitative estimates of body iron greatly enhance the evaluation of iron status and the sensitivity of iron intervention trials in populations in which inflammation is uncommon or has been excluded by laboratory screening. The method is useful clinically for monitoring iron status in those who are highly susceptible to iron deficiency.

Effect of low-dosage vitamin A and riboflavin on iron-folate supplementation in anaemic pregnant women.

A double-blind, placebo, controlled trial was conducted in Banyudono subdistrict, Boyolali regency, Central Java province, Indonesia. The aim of the study was to determine whether adding low-dosage vitamin A and riboflavin can enhance the effect of iron-folate supplementation in anaemic pregnant women. From July to November 2000, 202 pregnant women were screened for anaemia (haemoglobin < 11.0 g/dL). One hundred and three pregnant women (51%) were found to be anaemic and were then allocated alternately into four groups. Over a period of 60 days, group IF (n = 29) received iron-folate tablets (200 mg FeSO4 and 250 microg folic acid) + 5 mg glucose: group IFR (n = 22) received iron-folate tablets + 5 mg riboflavin; group IFA (n = 29) received iron-folate tablets + 2.75 mg retinyl palmitate (equal to 5000 IU vitamin A); and group IFRA (n = 23) received iron-folate tablets + 5 mg riboflavin + 2.75 mg retinyl palmitate. At the end of the study 19 pregnant women (18.4%) were excluded from the analysis because of various reasons. Statistical analysis was based on 84 women (81.5%): group IF, n = 25; group IFR, n = 22; group IFA, n = 18; and group IFRA, n = 19. Haemoglobin measurements were carried out using the Technicon H1* (cyanmethaemoglobin method). All groups showed a significant increase in haemoglobin concentration (P < 0.05), except group IFA (P > 0.05), with the highest increment being in group FR. Multiple comparisons only showed significant differences between group IFR and group IFA (P < 0.05). It can be concluded that iron-folate supplementation can increase haemoglobin concentrations in anaemic pregnant women. Adding riboflavin tends to enhance the effect of iron-folate supplementation, but this is not the case with adding vitamin A.

The relation between antiphospholipid syndrome-related pregnancy morbidity and non-gravid vascular thrombosis: a review of the literature and management strategies.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is associated with pregnancy morbidity and vascular thrombosis in the presence of circulating antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies. Clinical manifestations of aPL antibodies represent a spectrum (asymptomatic, pregnancy events, vascular events, or both pregnancy and vascular events), and APS should not be considered a single disease with a predictable outcome. Patients with aPL antibodies are at increased risk of vascular thrombotic events during pregnancy, the postpartum period, and even during long-term follow-up after an APS-related pregnancy event. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review the relation between APS-related pregnancy morbidity and vascular thrombosis, and to address the importance of prophylactic therapy during and after APS pregnancies to prevent maternal thrombotic complications. During pregnancy, low-dose aspirin (LDA) should be considered for all patients with aPL antibodies and heparin should be added to LDA in patients fulfilling the Sapporo criteria for definite APS. During delivery, especially with caesarian section, periods without anticoagulation should be kept to an absolute minimum. Some data suggest that LDA might be effective against future non-gravid vascular thrombosis in patients with APS and a history of only pregnancy morbidity.