Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12011, 2024 05 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796466

RESUMO

Ocular trauma often involves intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) that pose challenges in accurate diagnosis due to their size, shape, and material composition. In this study, we proposed a novel whole-eye 3D ophthalmic ultrasound B-scan (3D-UBS) system for automating image acquisition and improved 3D visualization, thereby improving sensitivity for detecting IOFBs. 3D-UBS utilizes 14 MHz Clarius L20 probe, a motorized translation stage, and a surgical microscope for precise placement and movement. The system's 3D point spread function (PSF) is 0.377 × 0.550 × 0.894 mm3 characterized by the full-width at half-maximum intensity values in the axial, lateral and elevation directions. Digital phantom and ex vivo ocular models were prepared using four types of IOFBs (i.e., plastic, wood, metal, and glass). Ex vivo models were imaged with both 3D-UBS and clinical computed tomography (CT). Image preprocessing was performed on 3D-UBS images to remove uneven illumination and speckle noise. Multiplanar reformatting in 3D-UBS provides optimal plane selection after acquisition, reducing the need for a trained ultrasonographer. 3D-UBS outperforms CT in contrast for wood and plastic, with mean contrast improvement of 2.43 and 1.84 times, respectively. 3D-UBS was able to identify wood and plastic IOFBs larger than 250 µm and 300 in diameter, respectively. CT, with its wider PSF, was only able to detect wood and plastic IOFBs larger than 600 and 550 µm, respectively. Although contrast was higher in CT for metal and glass IOFBs, 3D-UBS provided sufficient contrast to identify those. 3D-UBS provides an easy-to-use, non-expert imaging approach for identifying small IOFBs of different materials and related ocular injuries at the point of care.


Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos no Olho , Imageamento Tridimensional , Ultrassonografia , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Imagens de Fantasmas , Animais , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
2.
Eur Radiol ; 11(8): 1502-5, 2001.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11519565

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of helical CT in the assessment of intraocular foreign bodies, evaluating two protocols with different collimation. We performed helical-CT studies in 30 patients. Fifteen patients were examined with 1.5-mm collimation and the other 15 patients with 3.0-mm collimation. All other imaging parameters were identical in both protocols. Multiplanar images were reconstructed. The examinations were reviewed for presence, localization and size of intraocular foreign bodies. We compare our results with the surgical data. We estimate the required examination time. In the first group (collimation 1.5 mm) an intraorbital foreign body was detected in 8 of 15 patients. In 3 of 8 patients an intraocular foreign body (all were metallic) was detected. In the second group (collimation 3.0 mm) an intraorbital foreign body was detected in 9 of 15 patients. In 8 of 9 patients an intraocular foreign body (all were metallic) was detected. Our results were confirmed by surgery in all cases. Examination time was 36 s in the first group and 18 s in the second group. Computed tomography should be considered the imaging modality of choice in the assessment of metallic intraocular foreign bodies and 3.0-mm collimation is optional, because of reduced examination time and radiation exposure.


Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos no Olho/diagnóstico por imagem , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Feminino , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Metais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Órbita/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
3.
Cent Afr J Med ; 45(4): 102-3, 1999 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10746391

RESUMO

A case of falsified non-accidental ocular injury of a 29 year old male is presented. The importance of an accurate history and appropriate investigations in the management of ocular injuries is highlighted to promote a high standard of health care delivery in Zimbabwe.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trabalho , Enganação , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/cirurgia , Anamnese/métodos , Adulto , Cegueira/etiologia , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografia , Indenização aos Trabalhadores
4.
Ophthalmology ; 105(9): 1679-85, 1998 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9754177

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of helical computed tomography (CT) versus conventional CT in the preoperative assessment of metallic intraocular foreign bodies on axial, coronal, and multiplanar reconstruction images in clinical routine. DESIGN: Prospective comparative trial, alternate assignment of consecutive patients. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen patients with penetrating eye injuries and suspected metallic intraocular foreign bodies were studied. INTERVENTION: Alternate patients were assigned to undergo either helical CT or conventional CT in the axial plane. Both the helical and the conventional data were transferred to a workstation, and reconstructions in the coronal and sagittal planes were performed. Additional direct coronal scanning was performed only when necessary for preoperative assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The quality of the directly obtained axial and coronal, as well as the reconstructed coronal and sagittal images, was assessed for each, imaging method based on the ability to detect and accurately localize foreign bodies. The size of the foreign bodies was measured and compared to the actual diameter. Total examination time and radiation dose delivered to the lens were measured for each imaging method. RESULTS: All foreign bodies were detected by each scanning method on the axial, the coronal, and on the reconstructed planes. The quality of the axial images was similar for helical and conventional CT. The helical technique provided high-quality reconstructed images comparable in quality to the directly obtained coronal planes in conventional CT. Reconstructions by conventional technique were not useful for preoperative assessment. The examination time for the total orbital volume was 18 seconds for helical CT examinations and 52 seconds for conventional CT examinations. Radiation dose delivered to the lens for the complete examination was 35 mGy for helical CT axial scanning, 56 mGy for conventional CT axial scanning, and 63 mGy for conventional CT coronal scanning. CONCLUSIONS: Helical CT multiplanar imaging offers several significant advantages for the preoperative assessment of metallic intraocular foreign bodies compared to the conventional CT technique in clinical practice, including short examination time, reduced motion artifacts, reduced radiation exposure, and the ability to obtain diagnostically useful coronal and sagittal reconstruction images without the need for additional scanning.


Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos no Olho/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Metais , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/etiologia , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
6.
Ophthalmology ; 104(1): 96-103, 1997 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9022111

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Intraorbital projectile metallic foreign bodies are associated with significant ocular and orbital injuries. The authors sought to evaluate epidemiologic factors, the incidence of associated ocular and orbital injury, and the nature and necessity of surgical intervention in these cases. METHODS: Charts of all patients with projectile intraorbital metallic foreign bodies seen at our institution (27) over the preceding 7 years were evaluated with respect to age, sex, type of injury, associated ocular and orbital injuries, location of the projectile (anterior, epibulbar, or posterior), postinjury visual acuity, and surgical intervention. RESULTS: The majority of patients were male, between the ages of 11 and 30, and had BB pellet injuries. Thirteen projectiles were lodged anteriorly, 4 were in an epibulbar position, and the remaining 10 were posterior to the equator. Twelve of 13 anterior, and 4 of 4 epibulbar foreign bodies were removed surgically, whereas only 2 of 10 posterior foreign bodies required surgery. No case of surgical intervention resulted in a decrease of visual acuity. Associated ocular injuries were both more common and severe in patients with posteriorly located foreign bodies. Final visual acuity was better at presentation and at discharge in patients with anteriorly located foreign bodies. CONCLUSION: Intraorbital projectile metallic foreign bodies can be a source of significant ocular morbidity. Management of these cases is dependent on the location of the projectile. Ancillary radiographic studies can be helpful. Surgery to remove the projectile should be considered in each case, but foreign bodies that are not readily accessible often may be left safely in place. Closer regulation of the pellet gun industry, with an emphasis on education and protective eyewear use, would be helpful in reducing these injuries.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trabalho , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/epidemiologia , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Órbita/lesões , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Acidentes de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Boston/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/cirurgia , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Metais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Órbita/diagnóstico por imagem , Órbita/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Acuidade Visual , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia
7.
Eye (Lond) ; 4 ( Pt 5): 727-31, 1990.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2282949

RESUMO

The accurate detection and localisation of retained intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB) is important in the planning of subsequent surgical management. Using a porcine eye model, the authors have compared the relative detection rates of real time ultrasonography and plain roentgenograms for a variety of IOFBs. With an overall detection rate of 93%, ultrasonography appears to be a considerably more sensitive investigative tool than plain roentgenograms (40%) for the imaging of IOFBs, particularly those that are non-metallic.


Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos no Olho/diagnóstico por imagem , Animais , Radiografia , Suínos , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA