Design, clinical applications and post-surgical assessment of bioresorbable 3D-printed craniofacial composite implants.

This study details the design, fabrication, clinical trials' evaluation, and analysis after the clinical application of 3D-printed bone reconstruction implants made of nHAp@PLDLLA [nanohydroxyapatite@poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide)] biomaterial. The 3D-printed formulations have been tested as bone reconstruction Cranioimplants in 3 different medical cases, including frontal lobe, mandibular bone, and cleft palate reconstructions. Replacing one of the implants after 6 months provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the post-surgical implant obtained from a human patient. This allowed us to quantify physicochemical changes and develop a spatial map of osseointegration and material degradation kinetics as a function of specific locations. To the best of our knowledge, hydrolytic degradation and variability in the physicochemical and mechanical properties of the biomimetic, 3D-printed implants have not been quantified in the literature after permanent placement in the human body. Such analysis has revealed the constantly changing properties of the implant, which should be considered to optimize the design of patient-specific bone substitutes. Moreover, it has been proven that the obtained composition can produce biomimetic, bioresorbable and bone-forming alloplastic substitutes tailored to each patient, allowing for shorter surgery times and faster patient recovery than currently available methods.

Letter to editor: Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.

This study presents a critical analysis of complications following cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive hemicraniectomy, focusing on autologous, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and computer-aided design (CAD) implants. The analysis encompasses a retrospective bicenter assessment, evaluating factors influencing surgical outcomes and emphasizing the significance of material selection in minimizing postoperative complications. The study's comprehensive examination of complication rates associated with various implant materials contributes significantly to understanding CP outcomes. While polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and autologous bone flaps (ABFs) exhibited higher rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and explantation, a meta-analysis revealed a contrasting lower infection rate for polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants. The study underscores the critical role of material selection in mitigating postoperative complications. Despite its strengths, the study's retrospective design, reliance on data from two centers, and limited sample size pose limitations. Future research should prioritize prospective, multicenter studies with standardized protocols to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy in CP procedures.

Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.

Cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a common neurosurgical procedure with a high complication rate. The best material for the repair of large cranial defects is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate different implant materials regarding surgery related complications after CP. Type of materials include the autologous bone flap (ABF), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), calcium phosphate reinforced with titanium mesh (CaP-Ti), polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and hydroxyapatite (HA). A retrospective, descriptive, observational bicenter study was performed, medical data of all patients who underwent CP after DHC between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2022 were analyzed. Follow-up was until December 31st, 2023. 139 consecutive patients with a median age of 54 years who received either PMMA (56/139; 40.3%), PEEK (35/139; 25.2%), CaP-Ti (21/139; 15.1%), ABF (25/139; 18.0%) or HA (2/139; 1.4%) cranial implant after DHC were included in the study. Median time from DHC to CP was 117 days and median follow-up period was 43 months. Surgical site infection was the most frequent surgery-related complication (13.7%; 19/139). PEEK implants were mostly affected (28.6%; 10/35), followed by ABF (20%; 5/25), CaP-Ti implants (9.5%; 2/21) and PMMA implants (1.7%, 1/56). Explantation was necessary for 9 PEEK implants (25.7%; 9/35), 6 ABFs (24.0%; 6/25), 3 CaP-Ti implants (14.3%; 3/21) and 4 PMMA implants (7.1%; 4/56). Besides infection, a postoperative hematoma was the most common cause. Median surgical time was 106 min, neither longer surgical time nor use of anticoagulation were significantly related to higher infection rates (p = 0.547; p = 0.152 respectively). Ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation prior to CP was noted in 33.8% (47/139) and not significantly associated with surgical related complications. Perioperative lumbar drainage, due to bulging brain, inserted in 38 patients (27.3%; 38/139) before surgery was protective when it comes to explantation of the implant (p = 0.035). Based on our results, CP is still related to a relatively high number of infections and further complications. Implant material seems to have a high effect on postoperative infections, since surgical time, anticoagulation therapy and hydrocephalus did not show a statistically significant effect on postoperative complications in this study. PEEK implants and ABFs seem to possess higher risk of postoperative infection. More biocompatible implants such as CaP-Ti might be beneficial. Further, prospective studies are necessary to answer this question.

Sonolucent Cranial Implants: A Window into the Future of Management of Neurosurgical Patients? A Systematic Review and Cost Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Computeed tomography (CT) is a cornerstone of the identification and management of acute changes in neurosurgery patients. In addition to the monetary expense of CT scans, further costs are incurred due to the time of patient transport and radiation exposure. Ultrasounds (USs)offer a safe, inexpensive, and bedside alternative to CT but obstacles remain due to decreased penetrance in the adult skull. Sonolucent Cranial Implants (SCIs) offer a window for USs to view intracranial architectures. METHODS: The authors performed a PRISMA guidelines-based systematic review of the literature. Information was extracted from included articles in regards to illness pathology, US imaging feasibility, comparison to standard imaging, infections, and revisions. Costs were collected in regards to price of implant and follow-up imaging. RESULTS: A total of 226 articles resulted, of which 5 were included in the study. Ninety non-duplicate patients who received SCIs were analyzed. The pathologies of included patients is as follows: 51 patients were after extracranial-intracranial bypass, 37 after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for hydrocephalus, 1 after tumor resection, and 1 after cranioplasty following decompressive hemicraniectomy. All studies noted feasibility of US and comparability to standard imaging following SCI placement. Follow-up imaging with trans-sonolucent cranial implant ultrasound was estimated to save up to $4,000 per patient depending on the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Initial studies suggest that US imaging through SCIs is a safe and efficacious alternative to CT imaging in neurosurgical patients. Cost analysis suggests that SCI and subsequent US can offer a cost savings compared with current treatment.

Toward global availability of low-cost, patient-specific cranial implants: creation and validation of automated CranialRebuild freeware application.

PURPOSE: Financial restrictions limit the options for hermetically precise, patient-specific cranial implants (PSCIs) after decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) in low-income countries. Use of image segmentation, modeling software, and 3D printers has lowered costs associated with PSCIs. However, requirements of time and technical expertise have prevented widespread utilization. Our objective was to create a fully automated software algorithm that is able to generate a virtual model (.STL) of a negative of an implant using CT imaging following DHC. METHODS: A freeware algorithm (CranialRebuild) was constructed with the following capabilities: (1) after the upload of digital imaging and communications in medicine files, the normal side is analyzed in reference to the side of DHC, (2) Boolean subtraction is used to obtain a virtual image of the desired implant, and (3) a two-piece virtual model (.STL) of the PSCI mold is generated. In four cadaveric specimens, a standard DHC was performed. Post-DHC CT imaging was used to obtain a .STL of the negative of the implant, which was then printed using poly-lactic acid (PLA). Methylmethacrylate cement was used to generate a PSCI from the mold. The PSCIs were implanted into the index specimens; cosmesis was subjectively evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Two specimens were graded as 4/5, indicating that minor post-processing modification was needed for optimal cosmesis. Two specimens were graded as 3/5, indicating that optimal cosmesis could be obtained following moderate post-processing modification. CONCLUSIONS: CranialRebuild can be used to create hermetically precise PSCIs at a fraction of the price of third-party vendors. Validation of this technology has significant implications for the accessibility of customized cranial implants worldwide.

The cost of a plastic surgery team assisting with cranioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: Cranioplasty is a commonly performed neurosurgical procedure that restores cranial anatomy. While plastic surgeons are commonly involved with cranioplasties, the cost of performing a cranioplasty with neurosurgery alone (N) vs. neurosurgery and plastic surgery (N + P) is unknown. METHODS: A single-center, multi-surgeon, retrospective cohort study was undertaken on all cranioplasties performed from 2012 to 22. The primary exposure variable of interest was operating team, comparing N vs. N + P. Cost data was inflation-adjusted to January 2022 using Healthcare Producer Price Index as calculated by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. RESULTS: 186 patients (105 N vs. 81 N + P) underwent cranioplasties. The N + P group has a significantly longer length-of-stay (LOS) 4.5 ± 1.6days, vs. 6.0 ± 1.3days (p < 0.001), but no significant difference in reoperation, readmission, sepsis, or wound breakdown. N was significantly less expensive than N + P during both the initial cranioplasty cost ($36,739 ± $4592 vs. $41,129 ± $4374, p 0.014) and total cranioplasty costs including reoperations ($38,849 ± $5017 vs. $53,134 ± $6912, p < 0.001). Univariable analysis (threshold p = 0.20) was performed to justify inclusion into a multivariable regression model. Multivariable analysis for initial cranioplasty cost showed that sepsis (p = 0.024) and LOS (p = 0.003) were the dominant cost contributors compared to surgeon type (p = 0.200). However, surgeon type (N vs. N + P) was the only significant factor (p = 0.011) for total cost including revisions. CONCLUSIONS: Higher costs to N + P involvement without obvious change in outcomes were found in patients undergoing cranioplasty. Although other factors are more significant for the initial cranioplasty cost (sepsis, LOS), surgeon type proved the independent dominant factor for total cranioplasty costs, including revisions.

An Esthetic Scoring System for Scaphocephaly Assessment and Outcomes: A Pilot Study.

Scaphocephaly is the commonest form of craniosynostosis with a varied presentation consisting of many morphological components and a range of possible surgical interventions. However, with regard to esthetic assessment, there is no universally applied assessment system. The aim was to develop a simple assessment tool encompassing multiple phenotypic components of scaphocephaly. This was done by piloting a red/amber/green (RAG) scoring system to judge esthetic outcomes following scaphocephaly surgery using photographs and experienced observers. Standard photographic views of 20 patients who had undergone either passive or anterior 2/3 vault remodelling were scored by 5 experienced assessors. Using a RAG scoring system before and after scaphocephaly correction according to 6 morphological characteristics: visual impression of cephalic index, calvarial height, bitemporal pinching, frontal bossing, posterior bullet, and displacement of the vertex. All 5 assessors were asked to score the preoperative and postoperative views independently. The RAG scores were each assigned a number (1-3) and added to give a composite score (range 6-18) and these were averaged between the 5 assessors. There was a highly statistically significant difference between both preoperative and postoperative composite scores ( P <0.0001). A subgroup analysis of the postoperative composite score between the 2 surgical techniques showed no significant difference ( P =0.759). The RAG scoring system can be used to assess esthetic change following scaphocephaly correction and it provides both a visual analogue and a numerical indicator of change. This assessment method needs further validation but is a potentially reproducible way to score and compare esthetic outcomes in scaphocephaly correction.

Low-Cost 3-D-Printer-Assisted Personalized Cranioplasty Treatment: A Case Series of 14 Consecutive Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The current study used polylactic acid molds [developed locally using three-dimensional printers and our software] and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) to perform cranioplasty of bone defects in technically demanding areas of the skull while ensuring ideal cosmetic results and functional recovery. The overall aim was to identify the ideal method for standard cranioplasty procedures METHODS: Polylactic acid duplicates of the skull defects were created for eligible patients, after which a two-part negative mold composed of plaster and silicone was used to form artificial bone with PMMA. Thereafter, cranioplasty was performed and the treatment success was assessed by evaluating the percentage of similarity objectively and the body image scale subjectively. RESULTS: No surgical complications were seen to occur in the 14 patients included in the current study. Furthermore, the subjective and objective evaluation revealed a significant improvement in outcomes (p < 0.05). No postoperative complications were observed over a follow-up period of 6 months, except in 1 patient who exhibited late infection. CONCLUSIONS: Cranioplasty operations were performed at an economical price of approximately US$50 dollars, suggesting that this method can be applied widely. Furthermore, preoperative preparation of the PMMA models can help reduce the duration of anesthesia and surgery which, in turn, will minimize the risk of surgical complications. Based on current knowledge in the field, we believe that this method represents the ideal technique.

Use of a Single Standard Skull Model for Preparation of PMMA-Based Cranioplasty Flap: A Novel Low-Cost Technique.

AIM: To introduce a novel, low-cost technique for cranioplasty using a single standard polyvinyl chloride plastic skull model as a guide for cranioplasty flap development; to observe and to compare the functional and cosmetic outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, cohort study that included 20 patients who underwent cranioplasty at the Department of Neurosurgery, RMLIMS, Lucknow from September 2020 to September 2021. The patients were evaluated based on postoperative cosmesis and symptomatic relief. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in this study. All procedures were performed without any intraoperative or long-term complications noted on follow-up. None of the patients required reoperation. We observed no evidence of bleeding, infection, or poor scar formation. The patients and their families were satisfied with the cosmetic results of the procedure. CONCLUSION: Our technique provided excellent functional outcomes, cosmetic appearance, and improved clinical symptoms. This technique is currently the most cost-effective alternative available.

Longitudinal Assessment of Neurodevelopment in Patients With Nonsyndromic Single-Suture Craniosynostosis: A Retrospective Review of 66 Patients.

The neurodevelopmental consequences of nonsyndromic single-suture (NSS) craniosynostosis are the subject of continued debate. Although the predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) (BSID-III) have been questioned, this neurodevelopmental testing battery continues to be widely utilized among multidisciplinary craniofacial teams. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the neurodevelopmental functioning of patients with NSS craniosynostosis before and after surgical correction and the impact of surgical correction on neurodevelopmental trajectory based on BSID-III testing. All patients with NSS craniosynostosis who underwent cranial vault remodeling between 2009 and 2020 were considered for inclusion. Patients who failed to complete BSID-III testing within 2 months of surgery preoperatively and 2 years of surgery postoperatively were excluded. A total of 66 patients met criteria for the study. On language testing, both the preoperative mean score ( P =0.007) and postoperative mean score ( P =0.003) were significantly lower than the population norm. Furthermore, on motor testing, both the preoperative mean score ( P =0.005) and postoperative mean score ( P =0.001) were significantly lower than the population norm. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) testing revealed no significant change between preoperative and postoperative neurodevelopmental functioning. Overall, this study suggests that patients with NSS craniosynostosis experience modest delays in language and motor development, which are present before and after cranial vault remodeling. In addition, this study provides evidence that cranial vault remodeling does not significantly impact the neurodevelopmental trajectory. Multicenter st udies and refined neurodevelopmental testing methods are necessary to definitively establish the neurodevelopmental implications of NSS craniosynostosis.

Assessment of Thermal Damage from Robot-Drilled Craniotomy for Cranial Window Surgery in Mice.

Cranial window surgery allows for the imaging of brain tissue in live mice with the use of multiphoton or other intravital imaging techniques. However, when performing any craniotomy by hand, there is often thermal damage to brain tissue, which is inherently variable surgery-to-surgery and may be dependent on individual surgeon technique. Implementing a surgical robot can standardize surgery and lead to a decrease in thermal damage associated with surgery. In this study, three methods of robotic drilling were tested to evaluate thermal damage: horizontal, point-by-point, and pulsed point-by-point. Horizontal drilling utilizes a continuous drilling schematic, while point-by-point drills several holes encompassing the cranial window. Pulsed point-by-point adds a "2 s on, 2 s off" drilling scheme to allow for cooling in between drilling. Fluorescent imaging of Evans Blue (EB) dye injected intravenously measures damage to brain tissue, while a thermocouple placed under the drilling site measures thermal damage. Thermocouple results indicate a significant decrease in temperature change in the pulsed point-by-point (6.90 °C ± 1.35 °C) group compared to the horizontal (16.66 °C ± 2.08 °C) and point-by-point (18.69 °C ± 1.75 °C) groups. Similarly, the pulsed point-by-point group also showed significantly less EB presence after cranial window drilling compared to the horizontal method, indicating less damage to blood vessels in the brain. Thus, a pulsed point-by-point drilling method appears to be the optimal scheme for reducing thermal damage. A robotic drill is a useful tool to help minimize training, variability, and reduce thermal damage. With the expanding use of multiphoton imaging across research labs, it is important to improve the rigor and reproducibility of results. The methods addressed here will help inform others of how to better use these surgical robots to further advance the field.

A Low-Cost Simulation Model for Endoscopic-Assisted Sagittal Craniosynostosis Repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to introduce a low-cost simulation model for endoscopic-assisted sagittal craniosynostosis repair in which bleedings can be simulated and to present the initial experience using the model as a learning tool. METHODS: A 3-dimensional synthetic skull was printed using polylactic acid. The brain, dura mater, sagittal sinus, and skin were constructed using low-cost materials. The simulation was performed at Garrahan Pediatric Hospital's simulation center employing a rigid endoscope (Pes Pilot HD 0° 4 mm). RESULTS: A low-cost simulation model for sagittal craniosynostosis was built in order to recreate the steps needed to perform a strip craniectomy with lateral extensions. The initial estimated cost is 10 U.S. dollars, and subsequent uses cost approximately 2 U.S. dollars. Four training sessions were performed, and a reduction in surgical time was recorded from 125 to 80 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: We introduce a low-cost simulation model for scaphocephaly endoscopic-assisted surgery in which bleeding can be reproduced. The initial experience shows the possibility of using the model as a learning tool.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy and cranioplasty using subcutaneously preserved autologous bone flaps versus synthetic implants: perioperative outcomes and cost analysis.

OBJECTIVE: It has not been well-elucidated whether there are advantages to preserving bone flaps in abdominal subcutaneous (SQ) tissue after decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC), compared to discarding bone flaps. The authors aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and costs for patients undergoing autologous cranioplasty (AC) after DHC with the bone flap preserved in abdominal SQ tissue, and for patients undergoing synthetic cranioplasty (SC). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing DHC procedures between January 2017 and July 2021 at two tertiary care institutions. Patients were divided into two groups: those with flaps preserved in SQ tissue (SQ group), and those with the flap discarded (discarded group). Additional analysis was performed between patients undergoing AC versus SC. Primary end points included postoperative and surgical site complications. Secondary endpoints included operative costs, length of stay, and blood loss. RESULTS: A total of 248 patients who underwent DHC were included in the study, with 155 patients (62.5%) in the SQ group and 93 (37.5%) in the discarded group. Patients in the discarded group were more likely to have a diagnosis of severe TBI (57.0%), while the most prevalent diagnosis in the SQ group was malignant stroke (35.5%, p < 0.05). There were 8 (5.2%) abdominal surgical site infections and 9 (5.8%) abdominal hematomas. The AC group had a significantly higher reoperation rate (23.2% vs 12.9%, p = 0.046), with 11% attributable to abdominal reoperations. The average cost of a reoperation for an abdominal complication was $40,408.75 ± $2273. When comparing the AC group to the SC group after cranioplasty, there were no significant differences in complications or surgical site infections. There were 6 cases of significant bone resorption requiring cement supplementation or discarding of the bone flap. Increased mean operative charges were found for the SC group compared to the AC group ($72,362 vs $59,726, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Autologous bone flaps may offer a cost-effective option compared to synthetic flaps. However, when preserved in abdominal SQ tissue, they pose the risk of resorption over time as well as abdominal surgical site complications with increased reoperation rates. Further studies and methodologies such as cryopreservation of the bone flap may be beneficial to reduce costs and eliminate complications associated with abdominal SQ storage.

Affordable Low-Cost Home-Made Skull Model for Interactive Neurosurgical workshops: Experience with Hands-on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring at 2 International Neurosurgical Conferences.

BACKGROUND: Undergraduate neurosurgery conferences are acknowledged to play an important role in bridging the gap between a limited exposure to neurosurgery within medical schools and a highly competitive application process. Hands-on workshops are attractive for any conference but can be prohibitively expensive, especially for student societies. METHODS: We describe our method to manufacture a low-cost skull model, which we used for a hands-on intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring workshop station at 2 international neurosurgical conferences. We describe the workflow for our ICP monitoring workshop using these models. RESULTS: Our model acts as an appropriate substitute for more professional simulators while adequately mimicking the sensation of skull drilling, dural puncture, and intraparenchymal ICP bolt and probe insertion. All tools and resources are accessible from local markets and can be sourced online. A total of GB£100 was spent making 5 skull models and took 2 hours to manufacture by 3 individuals. The ICP monitoring workshop was carried out 3 times over 40 minutes, with each session accommodating 18 or 19 delegates (N = 55). CONCLUSIONS: These workshop models have been praised by medical students for increasing exposure and awareness toward neurosurgical procedures and the sophistication of investigations used by the specialty. Consultant neurosurgeons have praised the simulation provided by these models as closely mimicking the procedure in reality.

Customized cost-effective polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty: a cosmetic comparison with other low-cost methods of cranioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hand-moulded cranioplasty and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) prostheses made from bone impressions are economical but the cosmetic results are less than satisfactory. Commercially available customized prostheses perform better but are prohibitively expensive. We evaluate the performance of a locally developed, low-cost customized PMMA cranioplasty prosthesis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cosmetic outcome of 3 types of PMMA cranioplasty as well as with objective measurements on postoperative CT scans METHODS: This study includes 70 patients who underwent cranioplasty between March 2016 and June 2020. In this period, patients had their cranioplasty prostheses made by intra-operative hand moulding (HM), by using the removed bone as a template and making a bone impression (BI) or by 3D printing the prosthesis based on a CT scan. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed by the patient and the operating surgeon on an 8-point scale. The degree of measured anthropometric asymmetry was measured on a postoperative CT scan and correlated with the cosmetic outcome. RESULTS: Our locally produced 3D-printed cranioplasty prostheses showed a statistically better performance in cosmetic scores when compared to the HM and BI (p value < 0.001). CT anthropometric measurements significantly correlated with cosmetic outcome (p value 0.01) CONCLUSION: Our 3D cranioplasty prostheses had better cosmetic outcomes than HM and BI prostheses, and our technique is able to produce them at 10% of the cost of the currently available commercial customized prostheses.

Cost-Effective Cranioplasty Utilizing 3D Printed Molds: A Canadian Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty is a commonly performed neurosurgical procedure used to repair defects of the cranial vault. For large defects, 3D printing allows for the creation of patient-specific synthetic cranioplasties. Although these implants provide excellent cosmetic results for patients, costs are quite high. This makes their routine use challenging in the current Canadian healthcare environment. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with a novel, cost-effective method for cranioplasty using desktop 3D printers to manufacture patient-specific molds to aid in the shaping of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty intraoperatively. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent cranioplasty utilizing 3D printed custom molds was conducted at a single center between 2018 and 2020. Either a two-piece self-align or open-air mold was utilized. Material cost, as well as demographic, clinical, and radiologic data, was reviewed. A five-point ordinance scale was used to evaluate patient satisfaction with cosmesis. RESULTS: Four patients had previous craniectomies with infected bone flaps, 2 patients had significant bony destruction from tumor invasion, and 1 patient had bone flap resorption. Three patients underwent an open-air mold technique with a Ti-mesh/PMMA-combined implant. The remaining 4 patients underwent two-piece mold with PMMA-only implant. All patients had 'Good' to 'Excellent' cosmetic outcome with one post-operative acute subdural hematoma and one post-operative infection. Two-piece mold resulted in improved cosmetic outcome and cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printing can be used in a cost-effective manner to deliver good cranioplasty cosmesis. Wider adoption of this technique can result in significant healthcare cost savings without compromising patient outcome.

Avaliação da linguagem em cirurgia de craniotomia com paciente acordado: relato de caso / Language assessment in awake craniotomy: case report

RESUMO O objetivo deste relato foi descrever o caso de um paciente submetido à craniotomia, acordado, para a ressecção neurocirúrgica de um glioma e a avaliação linguística pré-operatória, intraoperatória e pós-operatória. Paciente do gênero masculino, 27 anos, escolaridade nível superior incompleto, apresentando vômitos, confusão mental e crise convulsiva tônico-clônica. Após a avaliação do paciente pela equipe e devidas orientações pré-operatórias, a proposta de excisão da lesão em estado de vigília foi esclarecida e aceita. Ao iniciar o procedimento, os campos foram ajustados para manter as vias aéreas e os olhos acessíveis para mapeamento com estimulação elétrica e avaliação da linguagem no período intraoperatório. Devido à localização do tumor próximo à área motora da fala, foram propostas tarefas para a avaliação da linguagem em quatro momentos: pré-operatório, intraoperatório, pós-operatório imediato e pós-operatório mediato. As habilidades linguísticas testadas nas quatro avaliações foram: compreensão e expressão da linguagem oral, transposição linguística, linguagem associativa, nomeação, discriminação visual, fluência e organização da sintaxe. Com o objetivo de controlar e eliminar o efeito de aprendizagem da testagem, foram solicitadas as mesmas tarefas, porém, com diferentes conteúdos para a testagem das habilidades nas quatro fases. A cirurgia com o paciente acordado permitiu a ressecção completa e segura do tumor, sem prejuízo motor ou linguístico. O engajamento da equipe, a interação interdisciplinar e o planejamento cirúrgico detalhado constituem um pilar para o bom resultado de um procedimento tão complexo e delicado.

ABSTRACT The purpose of this report is to describe the case of a patient who underwent awake craniotomy for neurosurgical resection of a glioma and pre, intra and postoperative linguistic assessment. Male patient, 27 years old, incomplete higher education presenting vomiting, mental confusion and tonic-clonic seizures. After the evaluation of the patient by the team and due preoperative guidance, the proposal of excision of the lesion while awake was clarified and accepted. At the start of the procedure, the fields were adjusted to keep the airway and eyes accessible for mapping with electrical stimulation and intraoperative language assessment. Due to the location of the tumor close to the speech motor area, tasks were proposed for the assessment of language in four moments: preoperative, intraoperative, immediate postoperative and mediate postoperative. The language skills tested in the four assessments were: comprehension and expression of oral language, linguistic transposition, associative language, naming, visual discrimination, fluency and syntax organization. In order to control and eliminate the learning effect of testing, the same tasks were requested, but with different contents for testing skills in the four phases. Surgery with the patient awake allowed the complete and safe resection of the tumor, without motor or linguistic damage to the patient. Team engagement, interdisciplinary interaction and detailed surgical planning constitute the pillar for the good result of such a complex and delicate procedure

Customized and Cost-Effective 3D Printed Mold for Cranioplasty: India's First Single Center Experience.

CONTEXT: Autologous bone is the most commonly used flap in cranioplasty to repair the defect; however, synthetic materials are available. Poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) is an effective polymer owing to its thermoplastic and radiolucent properties comparable to bone strength. Three-dimensional (3D) printing combined with computer-assisted design (CAD) is a simple, low-cost method to print molds that ensure surgical success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 114 patients underwent cranioplasty (July 2015-April 2018), and 25 of them using 3D printed template molds due to unavailability of autologous bone. The clinical features, patient demographics, and surgical parameters were analyzed. The visual analog score for cosmesis (VASC) and Odom's score was obtained pre and post-op. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients is 38.4 ± 14.6 years (Range, 9-66). The primary pathology for undergoing craniectomy is stroke (n = 13; 52%), traumatic brain injury (10; 40%) and tumor (2; 8%). The reason for nonavailability of flap was infection (n = 14;56%), flap resorption (4;16%), and trauma or tumor (7;28%). The mean time for manufacturing the 3D printed template is 13.2 ± 2.1 h. On follow-up, median Odom's score is excellent in 52% of cases, good in 40%, and fair in 8%. The mean VASC score on follow up is 8.2 ± 1.3. Three patients developed minor postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This is the first study from a single tertiary care center in India to systematically evaluate the outcomes in 3D cranioplasty using CAD and 3D printing technology. This method would be optimal especially in developing countries since PMMA is cost effective and also gives an ideal cosmetic effect.

3D-Printer-Assisted Patient-Specific Polymethyl Methacrylate Cranioplasty: A Case Series of 16 Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUND: To develop a novel 3D-printer-assisted method to fabricate patient-specific implants for cranioplasty and to demonstrate its feasibility and its use in 16 consecutive cases. METHODS: We report on 16 consecutive patients who have undergone cranioplasty surgery for an extensive skull defect after decompressive surgery and in which the bone flap was not available. We present the workflow for the implant production using a 3D-printer-assisted molding technique. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed/evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven out of our 16 patients (68.7%) presented with extensive hemispheric bone defects. Indication for initial craniotomy were traumatic brain injury (4; 25%), acute subdural hematoma (4; 25%), ischemic stroke (3; 18.8%), tumor (3; 18.8%), and ruptured aneurysm (2; 12.5%). Median (range) operation time was 121 (89-206) minutes. Median (range) intraoperative blood loss was 300 (100-3300) mL. The mean (range) follow-up period is 6 (0-21) months. Complications occurred in 7 out of our 16 patients (43.8%), in 6 (37.5%) of which a reoperation was required to evacuate an extra-axial hematoma (3; 50%), for shunting of an epidural fluid collection (1; 16.7%), or for skin flap necrosis (1; 16.7%). One patient (16.7%) developed a chronic asymptomatic subdural fluid collection that was stable over the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our workflow to intraoperatively produce patient-specific implants in a timely manner to cover cranial defects proved to be feasible. The results are cosmetically appealing, and postoperative CT scans show well-fitting implants. As implantable printable substrates are already available, we aim to advance and certify 3D-printed patient-specific implants in the near future.