Plastic Surgery Outreach Clinics Expand Access to Cleft and Craniofacial Care in Mississippi.

ABSTRACT: Accessing treatment at ACPA (American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association)-approved centers is challenging for individuals in rural communities. This study aims to assess how pediatric plastic surgery outreach clinics impact access for patients with orofacial cleft and craniosynostosis in Mississippi. An isochrone map was used to determine mean travel times from Mississippi counties to the sole pediatric hospital and the only ACPA-approved team in the state. This analysis was done before and after the establishment of two outreach clinics to assess differences in travel times and cost of travel to specialized plastic surgery care. Two sample t-tests were used for analysis.The addition of outreach clinics in North and South Mississippi led to a significant reduction in mean travel times for patients with cleft and craniofacial diagnoses across the state's counties (1.81 hours vs 1.46 hours, P < 0.001). Noteworthy travel cost savings were observed after the introduction of outreach clinics when considering both the pandemic gas prices ($15.27 vs $9.80, P < 0.001) and post-pandemic prices ($36.52 vs $23.43, P < 0.001).The addition of outreach clinics in Mississippi has expanded access to specialized healthcare for patients with cleft and craniofacial differences resulting in reduced travel time and cost savings for these patients. Establishing specialty outreach clinics in other rural states across the United States may contribute significantly to reducing burden of care for patients with clefts and craniofacial differences. Future studies can further investigate whether the inclusion of outreach clinics improves follow-up rates and surgical outcomes for these patients.

Geospatial and Socioeconomic Disparities Influencing the Management of Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Various social determinants of health have been described as predictors of clinical outcomes for the craniosynostosis population. However, literature lacks a granular depiction of socioeconomic factors that impact these outcomes, and little is known about the relationship between patients' proximity to the care center and management of the condition. METHODS/DESIGN: This study retrospectively evaluated patients with craniosynostosis who presented to a tertiary children's hospital between 2000 and 2019. Outcomes of interest included age at presentation for surgery, incidence of reoperation, and length of follow-up. Patient addresses were geocoded and plotted on two separate shapefiles containing block group information within San Diego County. The shapefiles included percent parental educational attainment (bachelor's degree or higher) and median household income from 2010. The year 2010 was chosen for the shapefiles because it is the median year of data collection for this study. Multivariate linear, logistic, and polynomial regression models were used to analyze the relationship between geospatial and socioeconomic predictors and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: There were 574 patients with craniosynostosis included in this study. The mean ± SD Haversine distance from the patient's home coordinates to the hospital coordinates was 107.2 ± 321.2 miles. After adjusting for the suture fused and insurance coverage, there was a significant positive correlation between distance to the hospital and age at index surgery (P = 0.018). There was no correlation between distance and incidence of reoperation (P = 0.266) or distance and duration of follow-up (P = 0.369). Using the same statistical adjustments, lower parental percent educational attainment and lower median household income correlated with older age at index surgery (P = 0.008 and P = 0.0066, respectively) but were not correlated with reoperation (P = 0.986 and P = 0.813, respectively) or duration of follow-up (P = 0.107 and P = 0.984, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results offer evidence that living a greater distance from the hospital and socioeconomic disparities including parental education and median household income may serve as barriers to prompt recognition of diagnosis and timely care in this population. However, the geospatial and socioeconomic factors studied do not seem to hinder incidence of reoperation or length of follow-up, suggesting that, once care has been initiated, longitudinal outcomes may be less impacted.

Factors associated with late surgical correction of craniosynostosis: A decade-long review of the United States nationwide readmission database.

Late-repair craniosynostosis (LRC), defined as craniosynostosis surgery beyond 1 year of age, is often associated with increased complexity and potential complications. Our study analyzed data from the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database to investigate patient factors related to LRC. Of 10 830 craniosynostosis repair cases, 17% were LRC. These patients were predominantly from lower-income families and had more comorbidities, indicating that socioeconomic status could be a significant contributor. LRC patients were typically treated at teaching hospitals and privately owned investment institutions. Our risk-adjusted analysis revealed that LRC patients were more likely to belong to the lowest-income quartile, receive treatment at privately owned investment hospitals, and use self-payment methods. Despite these challenges, the hospital stay duration did not significantly differ between the two groups. Interestingly, LRC patients faced a higher predicted mean total cost compared with those who had surgery before turning 1. This difference in cost did not translate to a longer length of stay, further emphasizing the complexity of managing LRC. These findings highlight the urgent need for earlier intervention in craniosynostosis cases, particularly in lower-income communities. The medical community must strive to improve early diagnosis and treatment strategies in order to mitigate the socioeconomic and health disparities observed in LRC patients.

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for the surgical management of craniosynostosis: Lausanne experience.

OBJECTIVE: Over the past decade, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program has demonstrated its effectiveness and efficiency in improving postoperative care and enhancing recovery across various surgical fields. Preliminary results of ERAS protocol implementation in craniosynostosis surgery are presented. METHODS: An ERAS protocol was developed and implemented for cranial pediatric neurosurgery, focusing on craniosynostosis repair. The study incorporated a pre-ERAS group consisting of a consecutive series of patients who underwent craniosynostosis repair surgery prior to the implementation of the ERAS protocol; the results were compared with a consecutive group of patients who had been prospectively collected since the introduction of the ERAS for craniosynostosis protocol. The safety, feasibility, and efficiency of the ERAS protocol in pediatric neurosurgery was evaluated, through the collection of clinical data from the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phase. Surgery-related complications were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Costs of the stays were obtained using a microcosting approach. RESULTS: A total of 35 pre-ERAS patients and 10 ERAS patients were included. Scaphocephaly was the most common pathology in both groups. The overall compliance with the pre-, intra-, and postoperative criteria significantly increased-from 35.5%, 64.4%, and 54.7%, respectively, in each phase to 94%, 90%, and 84% (p < 0.001). The authors noticed a reduction in the average opioid dose used per patient in the ERAS group (p = 0.004), and they observed a trend toward a decreased mean length of stay from 5.2 days in the pre-ERAS group to 4.6 days in the ERAS group, without an increase of the rate of readmission within 30 days of surgery. The rate of complications decreased but this difference was not statistically significant. The hospital costs lowered significantly: from 21,958 Confederatio Helvetica Francs (CHF) in the pre-ERAS group to 18,936 CHF in the ERAS group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The ERAS protocol represents a safe and cost-effective tool for the perioperative management of craniosynostosis. It showed its positive impact on the analgesia provided and on the reduction of in-hospital costs for these patients. ERAS protocols may thus be interesting options in the pediatric neurosurgical field.

Racial differences in the care of pediatric sagittal craniosynostosis: a single-institution cohort study affecting state Medicaid policy.

OBJECTIVE: Although research has shown the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic versus open repair of sagittal synostosis, few studies have shown how race, insurance status, and area deprivation impact care for these patients. The authors analyzed data from children evaluated for sagittal synostosis at a single institution to assess how socioeconomic factors, race, and insurance status affect the surgical treatment of this population. They hypothesized that race and indicators of disadvantage negatively impact workup and surgical timing for craniosynostosis surgery. METHODS: Medical records of patients treated for sagittal synostosis between 2010 and 2019 were reviewed. Area deprivation index (ADI) and rural-urban commuting area codes, as well as median income by zip code, were used to measure neighborhood disadvantage. Black and White patients were compared as well as patients using Medicaid versus private insurance. RESULTS: Fifty patients were prospectively included in the study. Thirty-one underwent open repair; 19 had endoscopic repair. All 8 (100%) Black patients had open repair, compared to 54.8% of White patients (p = 0.018). Black patients were more likely to use Medicaid compared to White patients (75.0% vs 28.6%, p = 0.019). White patients were younger at surgery (5.5 vs 10.0 months, p = 0.001), and Black patients had longer surgeries (147.5 minutes vs 110.0 minutes, p = 0.021). The median household income by zip code was similar for the two groups. Black patients were generally from areas of greater disadvantage compared to White patients, based on both state and national ADI scores (state: 7.5 vs 4.0, p = 0.013; national: 83.5 vs 60.0, p = 0.013). All (94.7%) but 1 patient undergoing endoscopic repair used private insurance compared to 14 (45.2%) patients in the open repair group (p = 0.001). Patients using Medicaid were from areas of greater disadvantage compared to those using private insurance by both state and national ADI scores (state: 6.0 vs 3.0, p = 0.001; national: 75.0 vs 52.0, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Because Medicaid in the geographic region of this study did not cover helmeting after endoscopic repair of sagittal synostosis, these patients usually had open repair, resulting in significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in treatment of sagittal synostosis. This research has led to a change in Alabama Medicaid policy to now cover the cost of postoperative helmeting.

Impact of neighborhood deprivation and social vulnerability on long-term outcomes and desire for revision in patients with craniosynostosis.

OBJECTIVE: The authors utilized the area deprivation index (ADI), a validated composite measure of socioeconomic disadvantage, and the social vulnerability index (SVI) to examine whether differences in neighborhood deprivation impact interventions and outcomes among patients with craniosynostosis. METHODS: Patients who underwent craniosynostosis repair between 2012 and 2017 were included. The authors collected data about demographic characteristics, comorbidities, follow-up visits, interventions, complications, desire for revision, and speech, developmental, and behavioral outcomes. National percentiles for ADI and SVI were determined using zip and Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) codes. ADI and SVI were analyzed by tertile. Firth logistic regressions and Spearman correlations were used to assess associations between ADI/SVI tertile and outcomes/interventions that differed on univariate analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to examine these associations in patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Differences in length of follow-up among the nonsyndromic patients in the different deprivation groups were assessed with multivariate Cox regressions. RESULTS: In total, 195 patients were included, with 37% of patients in the most disadvantaged ADI tertile and 20% of patients in the most vulnerable SVI tertile. Patients in more disadvantaged ADI tertiles were less likely to have physician-reported desire (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.61, p < 0.01) or parent-reported desire (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.52, p < 0.01) for revision, independent of sex and insurance status. In the nonsyndromic subgroup, inclusion in a more disadvantaged ADI tertile was associated with increased odds of speech/language concerns (OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.41-22.62, p < 0.01). There were no differences in interventions received or outcomes among SVI tertiles (p ≥ 0.24). Neither ADI nor SVI tertile was associated with risk of loss to follow-up among nonsyndromic patients (p ≥ 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Patients from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods may be at risk for poor speech outcomes and different standards of assessment for revision. Neighborhood measures of disadvantage represent a valuable tool to improve patient-centered care by allowing for modification of treatment protocols to meet the unique needs of patients and their families.

Results of training with a low-cost simulation model for endoscope-assisted scaphocephaly repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscope-assisted repair of sagittal craniosynostosis is an effective technique that requires a learning curve. Surgical simulation models can be applied to acquire the necessary skills for this procedure. Several models with a wide range of costs have been described for training in this technique. The aim of this work was to present the results of training with a low-cost simulation model for endoscope-assisted sagittal craniosynostosis repair. METHODS: A simulation model for sagittal craniosynostosis was developed using low-cost materials. The model is easily assembled and allows successive uses. Three neurosurgery residents, 3 fellows, and 2 neurosurgeons performed a 4-session training program in sagittal craniosynostosis repair. The Global Rating Scale (GRS) score, number of errors, and the time required to perform the task were reported by 2 independent evaluators using a checklist. Measurements were compared between the first and last training using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. All participants completed a questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) regarding the realism of the simulation model. RESULTS: A model was developed to recreate the steps required to perform an endoscope-assisted scaphocephaly repair with the patient in a simulated sphinx position. All participants improved their GRS performance between the first and final training. The median time needed to perform the initial training was 47.5 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 44.5-48 minutes, interrater difference [IRD] p = 0.77), and for the last training was 40.5 minutes (IQR 35.5-43 minutes, IRD p > 0.99). The median number of errors reported in the initial training was 5.5 (IQR 3-7.75 errors, IRD p = 0.8), and in the last training was 1 (IQR 0.75-2.25 errors, IRD p = 0.35). There was a statistically significant difference regarding the time and number of errors between the initial and final training (p < 0.001). More than 85% of the participants found that the surface anatomy, skull and anterior fontanel, fused sagittal suture, and epidural space of the model were realistic and had appropriate detail required to perform the surgery. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the endoscope handling was realistic, and that the steps and skills required to complete the task were representative of those required for the real procedure. CONCLUSIONS: A low-cost sagittal craniosynostosis simulation model was developed, allowing successive uses. The acquisition of skills within the simulation was demonstrated for all participants regarding the GRS score and the number of errors and time needed to perform the task. In addition, the model was found to be realistic in terms of anatomical references and the procedural steps required for this minimally invasive technique.

An Esthetic Scoring System for Scaphocephaly Assessment and Outcomes: A Pilot Study.

Scaphocephaly is the commonest form of craniosynostosis with a varied presentation consisting of many morphological components and a range of possible surgical interventions. However, with regard to esthetic assessment, there is no universally applied assessment system. The aim was to develop a simple assessment tool encompassing multiple phenotypic components of scaphocephaly. This was done by piloting a red/amber/green (RAG) scoring system to judge esthetic outcomes following scaphocephaly surgery using photographs and experienced observers. Standard photographic views of 20 patients who had undergone either passive or anterior 2/3 vault remodelling were scored by 5 experienced assessors. Using a RAG scoring system before and after scaphocephaly correction according to 6 morphological characteristics: visual impression of cephalic index, calvarial height, bitemporal pinching, frontal bossing, posterior bullet, and displacement of the vertex. All 5 assessors were asked to score the preoperative and postoperative views independently. The RAG scores were each assigned a number (1-3) and added to give a composite score (range 6-18) and these were averaged between the 5 assessors. There was a highly statistically significant difference between both preoperative and postoperative composite scores ( P <0.0001). A subgroup analysis of the postoperative composite score between the 2 surgical techniques showed no significant difference ( P =0.759). The RAG scoring system can be used to assess esthetic change following scaphocephaly correction and it provides both a visual analogue and a numerical indicator of change. This assessment method needs further validation but is a potentially reproducible way to score and compare esthetic outcomes in scaphocephaly correction.

Longitudinal Assessment of Neurodevelopment in Patients With Nonsyndromic Single-Suture Craniosynostosis: A Retrospective Review of 66 Patients.

The neurodevelopmental consequences of nonsyndromic single-suture (NSS) craniosynostosis are the subject of continued debate. Although the predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) (BSID-III) have been questioned, this neurodevelopmental testing battery continues to be widely utilized among multidisciplinary craniofacial teams. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the neurodevelopmental functioning of patients with NSS craniosynostosis before and after surgical correction and the impact of surgical correction on neurodevelopmental trajectory based on BSID-III testing. All patients with NSS craniosynostosis who underwent cranial vault remodeling between 2009 and 2020 were considered for inclusion. Patients who failed to complete BSID-III testing within 2 months of surgery preoperatively and 2 years of surgery postoperatively were excluded. A total of 66 patients met criteria for the study. On language testing, both the preoperative mean score ( P =0.007) and postoperative mean score ( P =0.003) were significantly lower than the population norm. Furthermore, on motor testing, both the preoperative mean score ( P =0.005) and postoperative mean score ( P =0.001) were significantly lower than the population norm. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) testing revealed no significant change between preoperative and postoperative neurodevelopmental functioning. Overall, this study suggests that patients with NSS craniosynostosis experience modest delays in language and motor development, which are present before and after cranial vault remodeling. In addition, this study provides evidence that cranial vault remodeling does not significantly impact the neurodevelopmental trajectory. Multicenter st udies and refined neurodevelopmental testing methods are necessary to definitively establish the neurodevelopmental implications of NSS craniosynostosis.

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Frontal Bossing and Temporal Pinching in Patients with Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using Curvature Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal craniosynostosis results in varying degrees of frontal bossing and bilateral temporal pinching. This study assessed the three-dimensional changes in these regions using curvature analysis and volumetric analysis before and 1 year after extended sagittal strip craniectomy (ESC) with postoperative helmet therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review of three-dimensional photographs of 50 subjects treated with ESC with postoperative helmet therapy and 50 age-matched controls was performed. Images were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Forehead convexity and temple concavity were quantified. Computed tomographic scans of subjects with and without sagittal synostosis were analyzed to assess the percentage of total intracranial volume (ICV) in the anterior cranial fossa before and after ESC with postoperative helmet therapy. RESULTS: Forehead convexity in the ESC with postoperative helmet therapy group preoperatively (24.49 ± 3.16 m -1 ) was significantly greater than controls (22.48 ± 3.84 m -1 ; P = 0.005). Forehead convexity significantly decreased after ESC with postoperative helmet therapy (18.79 ± 2.43 m -1 ; P < 0.001) and did not differ from controls (19.67 ± 3.08 m -1 ; P = 0.115). The ESC group had more concave temples preoperatively (-10.27 ± 4.37 m -1 ) as compared with controls (-6.99 ± 3.55 m -1 ; P < 0.001). Temple concavity significantly decreased after ESC (-4.82 ± 3.17 m -1 ; P < 0.001) and did not differ from controls (-5.64 ± 3.27 m -1 ; P = 0.075). In the ESC group, the percentage ICV in the anterior cranial fossa decreased from 22.03% to 18.99% after surgery, whereas the anterior volume in controls was stable (17.74% to 16.81%). CONCLUSIONS: The ESC group had significantly greater forehead convexity, temple concavity and anterior cranial fossa volume compared with controls. One year after ESC with postoperative helmet therapy, forehead convexity, temple concavity, and percentage ICV in the anterior fossa were comparable to controls. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

"Validation of Artificial Intelligence Severity Assessment in Metopic Craniosynostosis".

OBJECTIVE: Several severity metrics have been developed for metopic craniosynostosis, including a recent machine learning-derived algorithm. This study assessed the diagnostic concordance between machine learning and previously published severity indices. DESIGN: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of patients who underwent surgical correction of metopic craniosynostosis were quantitatively analyzed for severity. Each scan was manually measured to derive manual severity scores and also received a scaled metopic severity score (MSS) assigned by the machine learning algorithm. Regression analysis was used to correlate manually captured measurements to MSS. ROC analysis was performed for each severity metric and were compared to how accurately they distinguished cases of metopic synostosis from controls. RESULTS: In total, 194 CT scans were analyzed, 167 with metopic synostosis and 27 controls. The mean scaled MSS for the patients with metopic was 6.18 ± 2.53 compared to 0.60 ± 1.25 for controls. Multivariable regression analyses yielded an R-square of 0.66, with significant manual measurements of endocranial bifrontal angle (EBA) (P = 0.023), posterior angle of the anterior cranial fossa (p < 0.001), temporal depression angle (P = 0.042), age (P < 0.001), biparietal distance (P < 0.001), interdacryon distance (P = 0.033), and orbital width (P < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated a high diagnostic value of the MSS (AUC = 0.96, P < 0.001), which was comparable to other validated indices including the adjusted EBA (AUC = 0.98), EBA (AUC = 0.97), and biparietal/bitemporal ratio (AUC = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The machine learning algorithm offers an objective assessment of morphologic severity that provides a reliable composite impression of severity. The generated score is comparable to other severity indices in ability to distinguish cases of metopic synostosis from controls.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Prompt Craniosynostosis Workup and Treatment.

The purpose of this study was to identify racial and socioeconomic disparities in craniosynostosis evaluation and treatment, from referral to surgery. Patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis between 2012 and 2020 at a single center were identified. Chart review was used to collect demographic variables, age at referral to craniofacial care, age at diagnosis, age at surgery, and surgical technique (open versus limited incision). Multivariable linear and logistic regression models with lasso regularization assessed the independent effect of each variable. A total of 298 patients were included. Medicaid insurance was independently associated with a delay in referral of 83 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 4-161, P=0.04]. After referral, patients were diagnosed a median of 21 days later (interquartile range 7-40), though this was significantly prolonged in patients who were not White (ß 23 d, 95% CI 9-38, P=0.002), had coronal synostosis (ß 24 d, 95% CI 2-46, P=0.03), and had multiple suture synostosis (ß 47 d, 95% CI 27-67, P<0.001). Medicaid insurance was also independently associated with diagnosis over 3 months of age (risk ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, P=0.002) and undergoing surgery over 1 year of age (risk ratio 3.9, 95% CI 1.1-9.4, P=0.04). In conclusion, Medicaid insurance was associated with a 3-month delay in referral to craniofacial specialists and increased risk of diagnosis over 3 months of age, limiting surgical treatment options in this group. Patients with Medicaid also faced a 4-fold greater risk of delayed surgery, which could result in neurodevelopmental sequelae.

A Low-Cost Simulation Model for Endoscopic-Assisted Sagittal Craniosynostosis Repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to introduce a low-cost simulation model for endoscopic-assisted sagittal craniosynostosis repair in which bleedings can be simulated and to present the initial experience using the model as a learning tool. METHODS: A 3-dimensional synthetic skull was printed using polylactic acid. The brain, dura mater, sagittal sinus, and skin were constructed using low-cost materials. The simulation was performed at Garrahan Pediatric Hospital's simulation center employing a rigid endoscope (Pes Pilot HD 0° 4 mm). RESULTS: A low-cost simulation model for sagittal craniosynostosis was built in order to recreate the steps needed to perform a strip craniectomy with lateral extensions. The initial estimated cost is 10 U.S. dollars, and subsequent uses cost approximately 2 U.S. dollars. Four training sessions were performed, and a reduction in surgical time was recorded from 125 to 80 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: We introduce a low-cost simulation model for scaphocephaly endoscopic-assisted surgery in which bleeding can be reproduced. The initial experience shows the possibility of using the model as a learning tool.

Geographic Financial Analysis of Craniosynostosis Surgery in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the financial implications of demographic and socioeconomic factors upon the cost of surgical procedures for craniosynostosis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of admissions for craniosynostosis surgery in the United States from 2015 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Patient demographics, case volume, and surgical approach were analyzed in context of hospital charges. RESULTS: During the study interval, 3869 patients were admitted for surgery for craniosynostosis. In multivariate regression accounting for demographic and socioeconomic factors, hospital admission charges were significantly higher in patients with longer hospital length of stay ( P < 0.001), longer ICU length of stay ( P < 0.001), living in an underserved area ( P = 0.046), preoperative risk factors ( P = 0.016), and those undergoing open procedures ( P < 0.001); hospital admission charges were significantly lower in patients with White race ( P = 0.020) and those treated at high-volume centers ( P < 0.001). In multivariate regression, ICU length of stay was significantly higher in patients with preoperative risk factors ( P < 0.001), undergoing open procedures ( P < 0.001), government insurance ( P = 0.018), and not treated at high-volume centers ( P = 0.005). There were significant differences in admission charges ( P < 0.001), charge-to-cost ratios ( P < 0.001), and likelihood of being treated at high-volume craniofacial centers ( P < 0.001) across geographic regions of the country. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, there is significant sociodemographic variability in charges for craniosynostosis care, with increased hospital charges independently associated with non-White race, preoperative risk factors, and living in an underserved area.

Assessment of paediatric head shape and management of craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: The presentation of a child with an abnormal head shape can be challenging and should be met with an appropriate clinical approach. Craniosynostosis is a common cause of paediatric skull deformity and is best managed by a multispecialty tertiary referral unit with regular follow-up. As craniosynostosis frequently requires time-sensitive surgery, it is important to differentiate between craniosynostosis and common self-limiting conditions such as deformational plagiocephaly. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to outline the clinical approach to paediatric skull deformity in the general practice setting, and to highlight the importance of early referral if there is clinical suspicion of craniosynostosis. DISCUSSION: Parental concern regarding infant head shape is common. General practitioners (GPs) have an important role in assessment, diagnosis and referral for paediatric skull deformities. GPs are well placed to clinically differentiate between deformational plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis and provide timely referrals to optimise patient outcomes.

Socioeconomic Disparities in the Surgical Management of Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: The updated ICD-10 coding system introduced partway through 2015 offers codes with increased granularity for disease and procedure types. This is the first study to use ICD-10 codes to investigate disparities in the surgical management for craniosynostosis. METHODS: Using the Kids' Inpatient Database univariable analyses were performed to compare the relative odds of undergoing strip craniectomy, either endoscopic (ESC) or open (OSC), or calvarial vault remodeling (CVR) based on a variety of demographic and hospital-level variables. RESULTS: Of the 2,874 patients identified, 2,352 underwent CVR while 522 underwent SC. Of those undergoing SC, 295 and 228 had an endoscopic and open procedure, respectively. A greater proportion of patients who had private insurance (58.14% versus 47.49%) or were self-pay (8.06% versus 6.28%) underwent SC, whereas a higher percentage who were covered under Medicaid (46.23% versus 32.8%; P < 0.001) received CVR. ESC patients were 2.16 times more likely to have private insurance and 2.07 times more likely to be from the highest income quartile compared to OSC patients. However, there were no differences in terms of insurance type or income level between those undergoing CVR compared to OSC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the difference between CVR and SC can be attributed to the difference in the endoscopic versus open approaches to SC. Although the socioeconomic disparities persisted in the comparison between ESC and OSC, with patients receiving ESC coming from wealthier and commercially insured families, the same differences were not observed when comparing CVR with OSC.

Open Repair Versus Closed Repair: A Cost-Analysis of the Two Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Craniosynostoses.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the hospitalization charges of the 2 general surgical approaches in the treatment of craniosynostosis and determine if there was a significant difference between the 2. Several studies compared them side-by-side according to specific variables, such as success rates, postoperative complications, blood loss, and length of stay, but were limited by small sample sizes. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that was conducted using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). All patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis (Q75.0) were identified. The procedures were grouped according to the approach taken, whether it was a traditional, open approach, or a closed, minimally invasive approach. The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach (open vs closed). The outcome variables were the hospital charges (US dollars) and length of stay (days). Statistical analyses were based on the univariate and multivariate linear regression models, and P value less than .05 marked the significance level. RESULTS: Among a sample of 2,585 cases, an open approach was employed in 2,353 cases and a closed approach in 232 cases. Race, payer information, hospital region, admission status (elective vs not elective), patient location, and surgical approach (open vs closed) were all significant predictors (P < .15) of increased hospitalization charges. Relative to white patients, being in the 'other' racial class added $10,987 in hospital charges (P < .05). Relative to the Northeast, being a patient in the West added $33,459 in hospital charges (P < .01). Not being admitted electively added $72,572 (P < .01) relative to elective admissions. Finally, open repair added $59,539 (P < .01) in charges relative to closed repair. CONCLUSIONS: The traditional open approach added nearly $60,000 to the cost of the procedure when compared with the closed, endoscopic approach. The scope and invasiveness of the open approach demand greater surgical services, hospital services, supplies, and equipment, ultimately contributing to this increased cost.

Socioeconomic Factors Impact the Timing of Surgical Repair for Craniosynostosis - A Regional and National Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Timing of repair for patients with craniosynostosis are usually categorized into early "minimally invasive" surgeries such as strip craniotomy (SC), whereas those presenting later undergoing traditional cranial vault remolding (CVR). The impact that sociodemographic and socioeconomic disparities have on time to presentation for craniosynostosis and treatment is unknown. Herein, we examined sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors among a heterogenous patient population at a single institution who underwent craniosynostosis repair and compared this cohort to a national database. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients at UTHealth who underwent craniosynostosis repair from 2016 to 2020 was performed. The patients were divided into cohorts based on type of operation: SC or cranial vault remolding. The Kid inpatient Database (KiD) database was used to assess sociodemographic factors in relation to craniosynostosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine significant predictors and differences. RESULTS: Single Institution (Regional): Compared with nonHispanic white (NHW) patients, Hispanic (OR 0.11), and NonHispanic Black (NHB) (OR 0.14) had lower odds of undergoing SC. Compared to those on private insurance, patients on Medicaid (OR 0.36) had lower odds of undergoing SC. Using zip code median income levels, patients with a higher median income level had slightly higher odds of undergoing SC compared to patients with a lower median income (OR 1.000025). KIDS NATIONAL: Compared with non-Hispanic white patients, NHB (OR 0.32) and Asian (OR 0.47) patients had lower odds of undergoing repair before the age of 1. Compared to patients with private insurance, those with Medicaid (OR 0.67) and self-pay (OR 0.58) had lower odds of undergoing repair before the age of 1. Patients in the lowest income quartile (OR 0.68) and second lowest income quartile (OR 0.71) had lower odds of undergoing repair before the age of 1 compared to the highest quartile. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors may play a role in diagnosis of craniosynostosis and access to care. Patients of NHB and Hispanic race, lower income quartiles by zip code, and those that use public insurance are less likely to undergo early repair, both nationally and at our institution. Further research is needed to delineate the casualty of this disparity in presentation and timing of surgery.

Establishment of Objective Clinical Parameters for Assessment of Trigonocephaly: Are Caliper-Derived Clinical Measures Adequate?

OBJECTIVE: Objective clinical parameters characterizing the severity of trigonocephaly are essential given the concern for computerized tomography (CT) scans and radiation in infants. The present study seeks to develop a clinical tool by which to characterize trigonocephaly. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academically affiliated children's medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review identified patients with trigonocephaly for whom surgery was recommended (group 1) and those with metopic ridging without significant trigonocephaly (group 2). Normal age-matched controls were also evaluated (group 3). INTERVENTIONS: Cranial vault caliper measurements were compared across groups. Two ratios measuring anterior vault constriction were developed: (1) bitemporal width at the mid-forehead to the biparietal width, and (2) bitemporal width at the lateral brow to the biparietal width. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bitemporal width to biparietal width (ratio). RESULTS: Caliper measures were obtained from 19 patients in group 1, 8 patients in group 2, and 19 patients in group 3 (controls). Cranial indices were not significantly different across groups. The bitemporal width at the mid-forehead to the biparietal width ratio was significantly lower in group 1, with no difference between groups 2 and 3. The bitemporal width at the lateral brow to the biparietal width ratio was significantly different between all 3 groups, with group 1 < group 2 < group 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bitemporal to biparietal ratios are a quantitative, objective clinical measure that can be used to differentiate patients with significant trigonocephaly from those with metopic ridging but no significant cranial deformity. These findings suggest that caliper-derived indices can assist in characterizing surgically relevant cranial vault deformities secondary to metopic synostosis and may circumvent CT-based analysis.

Disparities in Craniosynostosis Outcomes by Race and Insurance Status.

ABSTRACT: Disparities in access to care for surgical intervention in craniosynostosis have been suggested as a cause in discrepancies between the surgical approach and consequently perioperative outcomes following surgery. This work aimed to investigate the influence of race, insurance status, and the presence of craniosynostosis-related conditions on the short-term outcomes after the surgical management of craniosynostosis. Using the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2010 to 2012, sociodemographic predictors for 30-day postoperative complication rates and requirements for blood transfusion in craniosynostosis surgeries were identified. Medicaid patients were significantly more likely to experience complications (P = 0.013) and higher rates of blood transfusions (P = 0.011). Compared to those without any complications, patients who experienced postoperative complications and blood transfusions were older (191.5 versus 181.7 days old, P < 0.001), had a greater number of chronic diseases (P < 0.001), and had a longer average length of stay (P < 0.001). On multivariable regression, Medicaid patients were 1.7 times more likely to experience any postoperative complication compared to privately insured patients. White patients also experienced a 0.741 times lower likelihood of requiring a blood transfusion. At the hospital level, receiving surgery at government-operated hospitals was found to be a protective factor for postoperative complications compared to for-profit private (P = 0.016) and nonprofit private (P = 0.028). Healthcare providers and policy makers should be cognizant of these sociodemographic disparities and their potential causes to ensure equitable treatment for all patients regardless of insurance status and racial/ethnic background.