Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diabetes Care ; 43(10): 2396-2402, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32737138

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We examined changes in glucose-lowering medication spending and quantified the magnitude of factors that are contributing to these changes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, we estimated the change in spending on glucose-lowering medications during 2005-2007 and 2015-2017 among adults aged ≥18 years with diabetes. We decomposed the increase in total spending by medication groups: for insulin, by human and analog; and for noninsulin, by metformin, older, newer, and combination medications. For each group, we quantified the contributions by the number of users and cost-per-user. Costs were in 2017 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: National spending on glucose-lowering medications increased by $40.6 billion (240%), of which insulin and noninsulin medications contributed $28.6 billion (169%) and $12.0 billion (71%), respectively. For insulin, the increase was mainly associated with higher expenditures from analogs (156%). For noninsulin, the increase was a net effect of higher cost for newer medications (+88%) and decreased cost for older medications (-34%). Most of the increase in insulin spending came from the increase in cost-per-user. However, the increase in the number of users contributed more than cost-per-user in the rise of most noninsulin groups. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in national spending on glucose-lowering medications during the past decade was mostly associated with the increased costs for insulin, analogs in particular, and newer noninsulin medicines, and cost-per-user had a larger effect than the number of users. Understanding the factors contributing to the increase helps identify ways to curb the growth in costs.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Custos de Medicamentos/história , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/classificação , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Cobertura do Seguro/história , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Cancer Discov ; 5(8): 790, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26243858

RESUMO

Global spending on oncology drugs hit $100 billion in 2014, an increase of 10.3% over 2013. The United States accounts for 42.2% of total spending.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Saúde Global/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/história , História do Século XXI , Humanos
5.
Pharmazie ; 69(1): 76-80, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24601229

RESUMO

The Museum of the History of Lithuanian Medicine and Pharmacy has a prescription book by a pharmacist Teodor. Geldner from Telsiai (the tsarist Russia's Lithuanian Vilnius Governorate), dated 1830. Each medication that was produced at the pharmacy had to be registered in this book. The entries included the composition of the drug, its form, usage, price, the physician's name, and (sometimes) the method of production. This paper presents the content analysis of this book. The study revealed which medicines were used for the treatment of patients back then, which principles of therapy predominated, and what the social status of the patients was.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/história , História da Farmácia , Animais , Livros , Formas de Dosagem , Custos de Medicamentos/história , Tratamento Farmacológico/história , História do Século XIX , Humanos , Lituânia , Médicos , Preparações de Plantas
6.
PLoS One ; 8(9): e74399, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24098644

RESUMO

This observational study investigates the private sector, retail pharmaceutical market of 19 low and middle income countries (LMICs) in Latin America, Asia and the Middle East/South Africa analyzing the relationships between volume market share of generic and originator medicines over a time series from 2001 to 2011. Over 5000 individual pharmaceutical substances were divided into generic (unbranded generic, branded generic medicines) and originator categories for each country, including the United States as a comparator. In 9 selected LMICs, the market share of those originator substances with the largest decrease over time was compared to the market share of their counterpart generic versions. Generic medicines (branded generic plus unbranded generic) represent between 70 and 80% of market share in the private sector of these LMICs which exceeds that of most European countries. Branded generic medicine market share is higher than that of unbranded generics in all three regions and this is in contrast to the U.S. Although switching from an originator to its generic counterpart can save money, this narrative in reality is complex at the level of individual medicines. In some countries, the market behavior of some originator medicines that showed the most temporal decrease, showed switching to their generic counterpart. In other countries such as in the Middle East/South Africa and Asia, the loss of these originators was not accompanied by any change at all in market share of the equivalent generic version. For those countries with a significant increase in generic medicines market share and/or with evidence of comprehensive "switching" to generic versions, notably in Latin America, it would be worthwhile to establish cause-effect relationships between pharmaceutical policies and uptake of generic medicines. The absence of change in the generic medicines market share in other countries suggests that, at a minimum, generic medicines have not been strongly promoted.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição de Medicamentos/economia , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/história , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , História do Século XXI , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo
8.
Epilepsia ; 53 Suppl 8: 26-39, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23205960

RESUMO

Phenobarbital (phenobarbitone) was first used as an antiepileptic drug 100 years ago, in 1912. This article tells the story of the discovery of its antiepileptic action, its early development, and the subsequent course of its clinical use over the 100-year period. The side effects, pharmacokinetics, and misuse of barbiturates are considered, along with the more recent clinical trials and the drug's current clinical utilization. The introduction of controlled drug regulations, the comparative cost of phenobarbital, and its inclusion on the World Health Organization (WHO) essential drug list are discussed. It is one of the few drugs on the formulary in 1912 that is still listed today, and remarkably its efficacy in epilepsy has not been significantly bettered. The current recommendation by the WHO is that phenobarbital should be offered as the first option for therapy for convulsive epilepsy in adults and children if availability can be ensured. This is rated as a strong recommendation because of the proven efficacy and low cost of phenobarbital, and despite its perceived side-effect profile and the practical problems of access. Whether this recommendation puts "a hierarchy on the brain," as has been suggested, is arguable. Much still needs to be learned about the drug's effects, and the issues raised by phenobarbital have lessons for all antiepileptic drug therapy.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/história , Epilepsia/história , Fenobarbital/história , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/história , Custos de Medicamentos/história , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Europa (Continente) , Alemanha , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , Humanos , Fenobarbital/efeitos adversos , Fenobarbital/farmacocinética , Fenobarbital/uso terapêutico , Filatelia , Estados Unidos
10.
Am J Econ Sociol ; 71(1): 1-36, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22319815

RESUMO

Pharmaceutical firms attribute high prices and high profits to costs associated with researching and developing the next generation of life-saving drugs. Using data from annual reports, this article tests the validity of this claim. We find that while pharmaceutical firms do invest in R&D, they also enjoy strong rents; between 1988 and 2009, pharmaceuticals enjoyed profits of 3 to 37 times the all-industry average, depending on the years, while investing proportionately less in R&D than other high-R&D firms. Costs of pharmaceutical drugs have successfully flown below the radar in much of the current health care debate, with producers managing to obstruct alternative sourcing as well as payment cuts. While health care is examined for savings in other areas, sustained high pharmaceutical profits suggest that as a new health care policy develops in the U.S., the pharmaceutical industry should not be excluded from examination for significant savings in health care costs.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos , Indústria Farmacêutica , Economia , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Pesquisa , Custos de Medicamentos/história , Custos de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/educação , Indústria Farmacêutica/história , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Economia/história , Economia/legislação & jurisprudência , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/história , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Preparações Farmacêuticas/história , Pesquisa/economia , Pesquisa/educação , Pesquisa/história , Pesquisa/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos/etnologia
11.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 28(4): 949-61, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19597193

RESUMO

The global fight against malaria has been continually challenged by poor access to affordable, effective medicine. Growing resistance to chloroquine, the traditional treatment, has worsened the situation. Artemisinins, the successor therapy to chloroquine, are at least ten times more costly than the older drug. In developing countries, most malaria medicines are purchased in the private sector, where traditional aid mechanisms do not reach. So a new aid approach was needed. The Affordable Medicines Facility-malaria (AMFm) will efficiently supply publicly subsidized drugs to meet public- and private-sector demand in malaria-endemic countries. If artemisinins are priced more competitively, resistance to them will be delayed.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/história , Organização do Financiamento/história , Malária/história , Antimaláricos/economia , Antimaláricos/provisão & distribuição , Cloroquina/uso terapêutico , Custos de Medicamentos/história , Resistência a Medicamentos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/história , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Política
12.
J Hist Med Allied Sci ; 64(4): 429-73, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19493917

RESUMO

Between 1959 and 1962, Senator Estes Kefauver led a congressional investigation into the pricing practices of U.S. drug firms. As part of its defense, the industry mobilized the rhetoric of cold war and promoted the industry as a critical national asset in the global war against communism. The industry argued that any effort to undermine corporate innovation by inviting, as Kefauver proposed, greater government involvement in drug development threatened the public's health and invited socialism-in the form of socialized medicine-into the domestic political economy. This strategy proved critical to the industry's efforts to build political support for itself, particularly among the medical profession, and undermine Kefauver's reform agenda.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/história , Indústria Farmacêutica/história , Regulamentação Governamental/história , Política , Comunismo/história , Democracia , Custos de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/história , História do Século XX , Humanos , Patentes como Assunto/história , Patentes como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Preparações Farmacêuticas/história , U.R.S.S. , Estados Unidos
13.
Can Bull Med Hist ; 25(2): 407-31, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19227792

RESUMO

This article traces insulin prices in Canada from 1922, just after its discovery at the University of Toronto, to 1984 when production fell out of Canadian control. Connaught Laboratories (part of the University of Toronto from 1914 to 1972) was the first to manufacture insulin and remained the sole Canadian producer. As a public trust, Connaught remained committed to providing insulin at the lowest possible price despite increasing economic pressures. This article analyzes the context surrounding the price of insulin preparations and how they fell from 1922 to 1942, remained unchanged until 1967, and rose during the 1970s.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/história , Custos de Medicamentos/história , Indústria Farmacêutica/história , Hipoglicemiantes/história , Insulina/história , Canadá , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , História do Século XX , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Insulina/economia
15.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 90 Suppl 1: S69-84, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16982158

RESUMO

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate, using an example, the utility of historical data to illuminate important questions in the field of drug dependence research. The literature on the consumption of addictive substances often characterizes users as being one of two types: "addicts" and "casual users." An econometric characterization of the responses of opium consumers in the late-colonial Netherlands Indies to changes in the price of opium and other important variables is provided, which explicitly acknowledges the existence of different types of opium smokers, as modeled in the underlying theory. The results reveal systematic differences between the behavior of groups of high-intensity consumers and groups of low-intensity consumers. While the findings show that both groups showed similar total price elasticities, the high-intensity consumers were affected predominantly via changes in the number of users rather than in per capita consumption. In the course of the analysis, various analytic methods that are new to the field of drug dependence research are introduced.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/história , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/história , Ópio/história , História do Século XX , Humanos , Indonésia
16.
Eur J Health Econ ; 8(4): 347-57, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17186200

RESUMO

The Republic of Poland joined the European Union (EU) on 1 May 2004. The EU accession brought new opportunities to the Polish health care system and the pharmaceutical market. However, there are still barriers to overcome such as bureaucracy, lack of transparency in pricing and reimbursement, decision-making processes, the short period of data exclusivity, respect for intellectual property rights, favorisation of local companies and low health care investment. Additionally, drug costs outpace overall economic development, a trend which is universally valid for almost all EU countries and which forms one of the most serious factors in health care expenditure. A systematic cost-effective assessment, the so-called fourth hurdle (after quality, efficacy and safety), of prescription drugs seems a necessity in most EU countries. The Polish Ministry of Health has defined aims for the future health care system in the National Drug Policy 2004-2008, including health economical criteria and instruments. However, it is to be expected that for some time there will be more a reimbursement hurdle instead of a fourth hurdle in controlling drug expenditure. This review focuses on the Polish pharmaceutical market with special consideration of the history of the Polish health care system. It will highlight the present situation of the Polish health care system after EU accession and provide an outlook to its possible future.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/história , Indústria Farmacêutica/história , Política de Saúde/história , Análise Custo-Benefício , Aprovação de Drogas , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Indústria Farmacêutica/organização & administração , União Europeia , História do Século XX , Humanos , Legislação de Medicamentos/história , Patentes como Assunto , Polônia , Mecanismo de Reembolso
18.
Pharm Hist ; 47(2): 47-61, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16447341

RESUMO

The "Trading with the Enemy Act" (TWEA) was enacted in October 1917 after America's entry into World War I and during a period of wartime scarcity and rising prices of synthetic drugs and dyestuffs that began in 1914. It was described as "An Act to define, regulate, and punish trading with the enemy, and for other purposes." The act and subsequent executive orders authorized an "Alien Property Custodian" to take control of all enemy property within the United States. Also, The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was authorized to issue licenses for the use of enemy owned patents, which covered a range of industrial and consumer products. Significantly, the FTC was given the power to set the conditions for use of the patents and to fix the price for those products necessary for health. The effect of these measures was to bring federal pre-marketing control over the production, testing, and pricing of the most therapeutically significant synthetic drugs of the day. Enactment of the TWEA and the events preceding and surrounding it are significant parts of the history of the American pharmaceutical industry and federal regulation.


Assuntos
Legislação de Medicamentos/história , Preparações Farmacêuticas/provisão & distribuição , I Guerra Mundial , Antitreponêmicos/história , Antitreponêmicos/provisão & distribuição , Arsfenamina/história , Arsfenamina/provisão & distribuição , Controle de Custos/história , Controle de Custos/legislação & jurisprudência , Custos de Medicamentos/história , Custos de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , História do Século XX , Humanos , Licenciamento/história , Licenciamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Patentes como Assunto/história , Patentes como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Preparações Farmacêuticas/normas , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA