Combined DNA Analysis from Stool and Blood Samples Improves Tumor Tracking and Assessment of Clonal Heterogeneity in Localized Rectal Cancer Patients.

Objectives: In this study, stool samples were evaluated for tumor mutation analysis via a targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) approach in a small patient cohort suffering from localized rectal cancer. Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) causes the second highest cancer-related death rate worldwide. Thus, improvements in disease assessment and monitoring that may facilitate treatment allocation and allow organ-sparing "watch-and-wait" treatment strategies are highly relevant for a significant number of CRC patients. Methods: Stool-based results were compared with mutation profiles derived from liquid biopsies and the gold standard procedure of tumor biopsy from the same patients. A workflow was established that enables the detection of de-novo tumor mutations in stool samples of CRC patients via ultra-sensitive cell-free tumor DNA target enrichment. Results: Notably, only a 19% overall concordance was found in mutational profiles across the compared sample specimens of stool, tumor, and liquid biopsies. Conclusion: Based on these results, the analysis of stool and liquid biopsy samples can provide important additional information on tumor heterogeneity and potentially on the assessment of minimal residual disease and clonal tumor evolution.

External Quality Assessment on Molecular Tumor Profiling with Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Methodologies Routinely Used in Clinical Pathology within the COIN Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Identification of tumor-derived variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has potential as a sensitive and reliable surrogate for tumor tissue-based routine diagnostic testing. However, variations in pre(analytical) procedures affect the efficiency of ctDNA recovery. Here, an external quality assessment (EQA) was performed to determine the performance of ctDNA mutation detection work flows that are used in current diagnostic settings across laboratories within the Dutch COIN consortium (ctDNA on the road to implementation in The Netherlands). METHODS: Aliquots of 3 high-volume diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) plasma samples and 3 artificial reference plasma samples with predetermined mutations were distributed among 16 Dutch laboratories. Participating laboratories were requested to perform ctDNA analysis for BRAF exon 15, EGFR exon 18-21, and KRAS exon 2-3 using their regular circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) analysis work flow. Laboratories were assessed based on adherence to the study protocol, overall detection rate, and overall genotyping performance. RESULTS: A broad range of preanalytical conditions (e.g., plasma volume, elution volume, and extraction methods) and analytical methodologies (e.g., droplet digital PCR [ddPCR], small-panel PCR assays, and next-generation sequencing [NGS]) were used. Six laboratories (38%) had a performance score of >0.90; all other laboratories scored between 0.26 and 0.80. Although 13 laboratories (81%) reached a 100% overall detection rate, the therapeutically relevant EGFR p.(S752_I759del) (69%), EGFR p.(N771_H773dup) (50%), and KRAS p.(G12C) (48%) mutations were frequently not genotyped accurately. CONCLUSIONS: Divergent (pre)analytical protocols could lead to discrepant clinical outcomes when using the same plasma samples. Standardization of (pre)analytical work flows can facilitate the implementation of reproducible liquid biopsy testing in the clinical routine.

Noninvasive minimal residual disease assessment in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma using digital droplet PCR.

Although several promising approaches for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) have been approved recently, it remains unclear which patients will ultimately achieve long-term responses. Circulating tumor (ct)DNA sequencing has emerged as a valuable tool to assess minimal residual disease (MRD). Correlations between MRD and outcomes have been shown in previously untreated DLBCL, but data on the repeated assessment of MRD in the dynamic course of rrDLBCL is limited. Here, we present an approach leveraging cost- and time-sensitivity of digital droplet (dd)PCR to repeatedly assess MRD in rrDLBCL and present proof-of-principle for its ability to predict outcomes.

Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment in Characterizing Recurrence Sites after Optimal Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, its role in characterizing recurrence sites after mCRC resection remains poorly understood. This single-institution study investigated the timing of ctDNA detection and its levels in the context of recurrence at different sites after mCRC resection. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent optimal resection of CRC metastases involving the peritoneum, distant lymph nodes, or liver, with serial postoperative tumor-informed ctDNA assessments (Signatera) were included. Recurrence sites, as defined by surveillance imaging or laparoscopy, were categorized as peritoneal-only and other distant sites (liver, lung, lymph nodes, or body wall). RESULTS: Among the 31 included patients, ctDNA was detected in all 26 (83.4%) patients with postoperative recurrence and was persistently undetectable in 5 patients who did not experience recurrence. At 3 months postsurgery, ctDNA was detected in 2 (25%) of 8 patients with peritoneal-only recurrence and 17 (94.4%) of 18 patients with distant recurrence (p < 0.001). Beyond 3 months, ctDNA was detected in the remaining 6 patients with peritoneal-only disease and 1 patient with distant disease. ctDNA detection preceded the clinical diagnosis of recurrence by a median of 9 weeks in both groups. At recurrence, peritoneal-only recurrent cases exhibited lower ctDNA levels (median 0.4 mean tumor molecules/mL, interquartile range 0.1 to 0.8) compared with distant recurrence (median 5.5 mean tumor molecules/mL, interquartile range 0.8 to 33.3, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal-only recurrence was associated with delayed ctDNA detection and low levels of ctDNA after optimal resection for mCRC. ctDNA testing may effectively characterize recurrence sites and may help guide subsequent treatments specific to the disease sites involved.

Assessment of postoperative circulating tumour DNA to predict early recurrence in patients with stage I-III right-sided colon cancer: prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Right-sided colon cancer (RCC) differs in mutation profile and risk of recurrence compared to distal colon cancer. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) present after surgery can identify patients with residual disease after curative surgery and predict risk of early recurrence. METHODS: This is a prospective observational biomarker trial with exploration of ctDNA in 50 non-metastatic RCC patients for which oncological right-sided colectomy was performed. Blood samples were collected preoperatively, within 1 month post surgery, 3 months (not mandatory), 6 months and every 6 months thereafter. Plasma cell free DNA and/or tumour was investigated for cancer-related mutations by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel AVENIO surveillance specifically designed for ctDNA analysis. Detected mutations were quantified using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for follow-up. Recurrence-free survival was explored. RESULTS: 50 patients were recruited. Somatic cancer-related mutations were detected in 47/50 patients. ddPCR validated results from NGS for 27/34 (plasma) and 72/72 samples (tumour). Preoperative ctDNA was detected in 31/47 of the stage I/III patients and the majority of ctDNA positive patients showed reduction of ctDNA after surgery (27/31). ctDNA-positive patients at first postoperative sample had high recurrence risk compared to patients without measurable ctDNA (adjusted hazard ratio: 172.91; 95% c.i.: 8.70 to 3437.24; P: 0.001). CONCLUSION: ctDNA was detectable in most patients with non-metastatic RCC before surgery. Positive postoperative ctDNA was strongly associated with early recurrence. Detectable postoperative ctDNA is a prognostic factor with high (100%) positive predictive value for recurrence in this cohort of non-metastatic RCC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03776591.

Short-term serial circulating tumor DNA assessment predicts therapeutic efficacy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated the potential clinical utility of short-term serial KRAS-mutated circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment for predicting therapeutic response in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We collected 144 blood samples from 18 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer that were undergoing initial first-line chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM plus nab-PTX). Analysis of KRAS-mutated ctDNA was quantified by digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) as mutant allele frequency (MAF). This study investigated pretreatment KRAS-mutated ctDNA status and ctDNA kinetics every few days (days 1, 3, 5 and 7) after initiation of chemotherapy and their potential as predictive indicators. RESULTS: Of the 18 enrolled patients, an increase in KRAS-mutated ctDNA MAF values from day 0-7 after initiation of chemotherapy was significantly associated with disease progression (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, positive pretreatment ctDNA status (MAF ≥ 0.02%) (P = 0.585) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) values above the median (P = 0.266) were not associated with disease progression. In univariate analysis, this short-term increase in ctDNA MAF values (day 0-7) was found to be associated with significantly shorter progression free survival (PFS) (hazard ration [HR], 24.234; range, (2.761-212.686); P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: This short-term ctDNA kinetics assessment may provide predictive information to reflect real-time therapeutic response and lead to effective refinement of regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing systemic chemotherapy.

Clinical application of molecular residual disease detection by circulation tumor DNA in solid cancers and a comparison of technologies: review article.

Molecular residual disease (MRD), detected by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be involved in the entire process of solid tumor management, including recurrence prediction, efficacy evaluation, and risk stratification. Currently, the detection technologies are divided into two main categories, as follows: tumor-agnostic and tumor informed. Tumor-informed assay obtains mutation information by sequencing tumor tissue samples before blood MRD monitoring, followed by formulation of a personalized MRD panel. Tumor-agnostic assays are carried out using a fixed panel without the mutation information from primary tumor tissue. The choice of testing strategy may depend on the level of evidence from ongoing randomized clinical trials, investigator preference, cost-effectiveness, patient economics, and availability of tumor tissue. The review describes the difference between tumor informed and tumor agnostic detection. In addition, the clinical application of ctDNA MRD in solid tumors was introduced, with emphasis on lung cancer, colorectal cancer, Urinary system cancer, and breast cancer.

Molecular response assessment using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in advanced solid tumors.

The therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced malignancies has changed dramatically over the last twenty years. The growing number of targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic options available have improved response rates and survival for a subset of patients, however determining which patients will experience clinical benefit from these therapies in order to avoid potential toxicities and reduce healthcare costs remains a clinical challenge. Cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is shed by tumor cells into systemic circulation and is already an integral part of routine clinical practice for the non-invasive tumor genotyping in advanced non-small cell lung cancer as well as other malignancies. The short half-life of ctDNA offers a unique opportunity to utilize early on-treatment changes in ctDNA for real-time assessment of therapeutic response and outcome, termed molecular response. Here, we provide a summary and review of the use of molecular response for the prediction of outcomes in patients with advanced cancer, including the current state of science, its application in clinic, and next steps for the development of this predictive tool.

Prediction of Resistance to 177Lu-PSMA Therapy by Assessment of Baseline Circulating Tumor DNA Biomarkers.

177Lu-PSMA-617 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T (collectively termed 177Lu-PSMA) are currently being used for the treatment of selected metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with PSMA PET-positive disease, but biomarkers for these agents remain incompletely understood. Methods: Pretreatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples were collected from 44 mCRPC patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA treatment. Prostate-specific antigen responders and nonresponders were assessed relative to the ctDNA findings at baseline. Results: The ctDNA findings indicated that nonresponders were more likely to have gene amplifications than were responders (75% vs. 39.2%, P = 0.03). In particular, amplifications in FGFR1 (25% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) and CCNE1 (31.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.001) were more likely to be present in nonresponders. CDK12 mutations were more likely to be present in nonresponders (25% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.05). Conclusion: Our analyses indicate that ctDNA assays may contain specific biomarkers predictive of response or resistance for 177Lu-PSMA-treated mCRPC patients. Additional confirmatory studies are required before clinicians can use these findings to make personalized treatment decisions.

Association of ctDNA detection and recurrence assessment in patients with neoadjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of neoadjuvant therapy is progressively expanding in various clinical settings. However, the absence of a clinically validated biomarker to evaluate the treatment response remains a significant challenge in the field. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection, a novel and emerging monitoring approach in the field of oncology, holds promise as a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with cancer. This meta-analysis investigated the clinical significance of ctDNA detection as a predictive tool for cancer recurrence in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted using public databases to identify relevant studies that investigated the association between ctDNA detection and cancer recurrence in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between cancer recurrence and relevant factors. Cancer recurrence was considered the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies encompassing 1590 patients across eight different cancer types were included in the final analysis. Positive ctDNA detection was significantly associated with higher cancer recurrence, especially at post-neoadjuvant treatment and post-surgery time points. The risk values for the different cancer categories and geographic areas also differed significantly. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive meta-analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between ctDNA detection and a higher risk of cancer recurrence in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. In addition, the risk of recurrence was influenced by variations in cancer type, timing of detection, and geographic region. These findings highlight the promising clinical applicability of ctDNA as a prognostic marker and monitoring approach for patients with cancer. However, the precise mechanism is unknown and more evidence is needed for further research.

The Importance of Feasibility Assessment in the Design of ctDNA Guided Trials - Results From the OPTIPAL II Study.

INTRODUCTION: Both quantitative and molecular changes in ctDNA can hold important information when treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but its clinical utility is yet to be established. Before conducting a large-scale randomized trial, it is essential to test feasibility. This study investigates whether ctDNA is feasible for detecting patients who will benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRC, who were considered for systemic palliative treatment and were eligible for ctDNA analysis. Mutational testing on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was done by ddPCR. ctDNA response from baseline to the third treatment cycle was evaluated in patients with detectable ctDNA at baseline. ctDNA maximum response was defined as undetectable ctDNA at the third treatment cycle, ctDNA partial response as any decrease in the ctDNA level, and ctDNA progression as any increase in the ctDNA level. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included. The time to test results for mutational testing on cfDNA was significantly shorter than on tumor tissue (p < .001). Progression-free survival were 11.2 months (reference group), 7.5 months (HR = 10.7, p= .02), and 4.6 months (HR = 11.4, p= .02) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively. Overall survival was 31.2 months (reference group), 15.2 months (HR = 4.1, p= .03), and 9.0 months (HR = 2.6, p= .03) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment mutational testing on cfDNA in daily clinic is feasible and can be applied in randomized clinical trials evaluating the clinical utility of ctDNA. Early dynamics in ctDNA during systemic treatment hold prognostic value.

Treatment stratification and prognosis assessment using circulating tumor DNA in locally advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging biomarker for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), giving hope for stratified treatment. As the completed studies have small sample sizes and different experimental methods, systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to explore their role in predicting pathological complete response (pCR), tumor recurrence, and prognosis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science were searched for potentially eligible studies published up to September 6, 2022. Pooled relative risk (RR) was calculated to predict pCR and tumor recurrence, and pooled hazard ratio (HR) was calculated to evaluate the prognosis of overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and metastasis-free survival (MRS). RESULTS: Twelve studies published between 2018 and 2022 included 931 patients, and 2544 serum samples were eventually included in the meta-analysis. The pooled revealed that ctDNA-negative patients were more likely to have a pCR (RR = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-2.12). The pooled revealed that ctDNA-positive patients were at high risk of recurrence (RR = 3.37, 95% CI: 2.34-4.85) and had a poorer prognosis for OS (HR = 3.03, 95% CI: 1.86-4.95), RFS (HR = 7.08, 95% CI: 4.12-12.14), and MRS (HR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.01-3.83). CONCLUSION: ctDNA may be useful for stratifying treatment and assessing prognosis in patients with LARC, but its clinical application still needs to be confirmed in a prospective multicenter study with large samples.

Circulating Tumor DNA Biomarkers for Response Assessment in Prostate Cancer.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is measurable in the majority of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Data indicate that ctDNA present at baseline can serve as a prognostic biomarker and changes in the ctDNA posttreatment can rapidly predict both time to progression and survival. See related article by Tolmeijer et al., p. 2835.

Early detection and stratification of lung cancer aided by a cost-effective assay targeting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation.

BACKGROUND: Detection of lung cancer at earlier stage can greatly improve patient survival. We aim to develop, validate, and implement a cost-effective ctDNA-methylation-based plasma test to aid lung cancer early detection. METHODS: Case-control studies were designed to select the most relevant markers to lung cancer. Patients with lung cancer or benign lung disease and healthy individuals were recruited from different clinical centers. A multi-locus qPCR assay, LunaCAM, was developed for lung cancer alertness by ctDNA methylation. Two LunaCAM models were built for screening (-S) or diagnostic aid (-D) to favor sensitivity or specificity, respectively. The performance of the models was validated for different intended uses in clinics. RESULTS: Profiling DNA methylation on 429 plasma samples including 209 lung cancer, 123 benign diseases and 97 healthy participants identified the top markers that detected lung cancer from benign diseases and healthy with an AUC of 0.85 and 0.95, respectively. The most effective methylation markers were verified individually in 40 tissues and 169 plasma samples to develop LunaCAM assay. Two models corresponding to different intended uses were trained with 513 plasma samples, and validated with an independent collection of 172 plasma samples. In validation, LunaCAM-S model achieved an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.94) between lung cancer and healthy individuals, whereas LunaCAM-D model stratified lung cancer from benign pulmonary diseases with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86). When implemented sequentially in the validation set, LunaCAM-S enables to identify 58 patients of lung cancer (90.6% sensitivity), followed by LunaCAM-D to remove 20 patients with no evidence of cancer (83.3% specificity). LunaCAM-D significantly outperformed the blood test of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and the combined model can further improve the predictive power for lung cancer to an overall AUC of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: We developed two different models by ctDNA methylation assay to sensitively detect early-stage lung cancer or specifically classify lung benign diseases. Implemented at different clinical settings, LunaCAM models has a potential to provide a facile and inexpensive avenue for early screening and diagnostic aids for lung cancer.

Phase I Study of Acalabrutinib Plus Danvatirsen (AZD9150) in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Including Circulating Tumor DNA Biomarker Assessment.

PURPOSE: Novel targeted and immunotherapies have improved outcomes in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but toxicities limit widespread use. The selective Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor acalabrutinib has activity in patients with R/R DLBCL but durable responses are uncommon. STAT3 inhibition has demonstrated clinical activity in DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Final results of the phase I study of acalabrutinib plus STAT3 inhibitor (danvatirsen; AZD9150) in patients with R/R DLBCL are reported. Danvatirsen 200 mg intravenous infusion [Days 1, 3, 5 (Cycle 1); weekly infusions starting Day 8, Cycle 1] was administered in combination with oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received combination treatment. One dose-limiting toxicity (Grade 3 liver transaminase) occurred in 1 patient. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was PD (65%). In evaluable patients (n = 17), objective response rate was 24%; median duration of response was 1.9 months. All responders with available DLBCL cell-of-origin data were either activated B-cell or nongerminal center B-cell like subtype. Genetic subtype did not correlate with response. Baseline and longitudinal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentrations were mostly higher in nonresponding patients. cfDNA changes were generally concordant with imaging. Pretreatment circulating B-cell levels were higher in responders versus nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting both STAT3 and BTK in combination is safe and tolerable but efficacy is limited in R/R DLBCL. Results support evaluation of circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for clinical response.

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Minimal Residual Disease Assessment and Recurrence Risk in Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection with or without Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Emerging data have suggested that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be a reliable biomarker for minimal residual disease (MRD) in CRC patients. Recent studies have shown that the ability to detect MRD using ctDNA assay after curative-intent surgery will change how to assess the recurrence risk and patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy. We performed a meta-analysis of post-operative ctDNA in stage I-IV (oligometastatic) CRC patients after curative-intent resection. We included 23 studies representing 3568 patients with evaluable ctDNA in CRC patient post-curative-intent surgery. Data were extracted from each study to perform a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. software. Subsequent subgroup analysis was performed for stages I-III and oligometastatic stage IV CRC patients. Results showed that the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in post-surgical ctDNA-positive versus -negative patients in all stages was 7.27 (95% CI 5.49-9.62), p < 0.00001. Subgroup analysis revealed pooled HRs of 8.14 (95% CI 5.60-11.82) and 4.83 (95% CI 3.64-6.39) for stages I-III and IV CRC, respectively. The pooled HR for RFS in post-adjuvant chemotherapy ctDNA-positive versus -negative patients in all stages was 10.59 (95% CI 5.59-20.06), p < 0.00001. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has revolutionized non-invasive cancer diagnostics and monitoring, with two primary forms of analysis emerging: tumor-informed techniques and tumor-agnostic or tumor-naive techniques. Tumor-informed methods involve the initial identification of somatic mutations in tumor tissue, followed by the targeted sequencing of plasma DNA using a personalized assay. In contrast, the tumor-agnostic approach performs ctDNA analysis without prior knowledge of the patient's tumor tissue molecular profile. This review highlights the distinctive features and implications of each approach. Tumor-informed techniques enable the precise monitoring of known tumor-specific mutations, leveraging the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA detection. Conversely, the tumor-agnostic approach allows for a broader genetic and epigenetic analysis, potentially revealing novel alterations and enhancing our understanding of tumor heterogeneity. Both approaches have significant implications for personalized medicine and improved patient outcomes in the field of oncology. The subgroup analysis based on the ctDNA method showed pooled HRs of 8.66 (95% CI 6.38-11.75) and 3.76 (95% CI 2.58-5.48) for tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic, respectively. Our analysis emphasizes that post-operative ctDNA is a strong prognostic marker of RFS. Based on our results, ctDNA can be a significant and independent predictor of RFS. This real-time assessment of treatment benefits using ctDNA can be used as a surrogate endpoint for the development of novel drugs in the adjuvant setting.

Mutation profiling, tumour burden assessment, outcome prediction and disease monitoring by circulating tumour DNA in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was obtained, and the mutational profile was assessed in 47 patients with newly diagnosed mature T- and NK-cell lymphoma. To validate the mutations detected in cfDNA, paired tumour tissue samples were available for 36 patients. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed. A total of 279 somatic mutations involving 149 genes were identified in the 47 cfDNA samples. The overall sensitivity of plasma cfDNA in discovering biopsy-confirmed mutations was 73.9% with a specificity of 99.6%. When we considered only mutations with variant allele frequency >5% in the tumour biopsy, the sensitivity increased to 81.9%. Pretreatment ctDNA concentration and the number of mutations were highly correlated with tumour burden indicators including lactate dehydrogenase, Ann Arbor stage and International Prognostic Index score. Patients with high ctDNA level (>1.9 log ng/mL) had significantly lower overall response rates, inferior 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates than those with low level. Longitudinal analysis of ctDNA showed a strong agreement between ctDNA dynamics and the radiographic response. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that ctDNA may serve as a promising tool for mutational profiling, tumour burden assessment, outcome prediction and disease monitoring in PTCLs.

Circulating tumor DNA in molecular assessment feasibly predicts early progression of pancreatic cancer that cannot be identified via initial imaging.

Molecular assessment using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has not been well-defined. We recruited 61 pancreatic cancer (PC) patients who underwent initial computed tomography (CT) imaging study during first-line chemotherapy. Initial molecular assessment was performed using droplet digital PCR and defined as the change in KRAS-mutated ctDNA before and after treatments, which was classified into five categories: mNT, molecular negative; mCR, complete response; mPR, partial response; mSD, stable disease; mPD, progressive disease. Of 61 patients, 14 diagnosed with PD after initial CT imaging showed significantly worse therapeutic outcomes than 47 patients with disease control. In these 47 patients, initial molecular assessment exhibited significant differences in therapeutic outcomes between patients with and without ctDNA (mPD + mSD vs. mCR + mNT; 13.2 M vs. 21.7 M, P = 0.0029) but no difference between those with mPD and mSD + mCR + mNT, suggesting that the presence of ctDNA had more impact on the therapeutic outcomes than change in its number. Multivariate analysis revealed that it was the only independent prognostic factor (P = 0.0405). The presence of ctDNA in initial molecular assessment predicted early tumor progression and identified PC patients more likely to benefit from chemotherapy.

Pilot Study of Recurrent Ewing's Sarcoma Management with Vigil/Temozolomide/Irinotecan and Assessment of Circulating Tumor (ct) DNA.

PURPOSE: Treatment options for recurrent or refractory Ewing's sarcoma (ES) are limited. Vigil is a novel autologous tumor cell therapy expressing bi-shRNA furin/GMCSF plasmid, which previously demonstrated monotherapy activity in advanced ES. Herein we report safety and evidence of benefit to Vigil for ES as potential treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this pilot trial, eligible patients with recurrent or refractory ES who failed initial standard-of-care therapy received treatment with temozolomide (TEM) 100 mg/m2/day oral and irinotecan (IRI) 50 mg/m2/day oral, Days 1 to 5, in combination with Vigil (1 × 106-107 cells/mL/day intradermal, Day 15), every 21 days (Vigil/TEM/IRI). Objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Circulating tumor (ct) DNA analysis was done by patient-specific droplet digital PCR on baseline and serially collected on-treatment samples. RESULTS: Eight of 10 enrolled patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy (mean age 24.6; 12.6-46.1 years old); 2 did not receive Vigil. Seven of 8 patients previously received TEM/IRI. No Vigil-related adverse events were reported. Common ≥Grade 3 chemotherapy-related toxicity included neutropenia (50%) and thrombocytopenia (38%). We observed two partial response patients by RECIST; both showed histologic complete response without additional cancer therapy. Median PFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3-NA). Five patients showed stable disease or better for ≥6 months. Patient-specific EWS/FLI1 ctDNA was detectable in all 8 evaluable patients at baseline. Changes in ctDNA levels corresponded to changes in disease burden. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated safety of combination Vigil/TEM/IRI.