Assessment of patient-reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora.

PurposeTo assess and compare the subjective improvement in symptoms and quality of life in adult patients who underwent commonly performed oculoplastic surgical interventions to treat epiphora.Materials and methodsA prospective study was undertaken involving all adult patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), lid tightening (lateral tarsal strip or lateral wedge resection), and punctoplasty surgery at our institution. We assessed severity of epiphora preoperatively using the Munk score. At 3 months postoperatively, all patients were sent postal questionnaires comprising of Munk score, 'social impact score' from validated Lac-Q questionnaire ranging from 0 (no impact) to 5 (maximal negative impact) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) score, ranging from -100 (maximal detriment) to +100 (maximal benefit).ResultsA total of 134 questionnaires were sent with an overall response rate of 74.6%. For the purpose of data analysis, patients were divided into four groups: DCR, lid tightening, punctoplasty, and combined group (lid tightening plus punctoplasty). There was statistically significant improvement in subjective epiphora postoperatively, as assessed by Munk score (P<0.001) in all groups. The total GBI scores were +42.67 (95% CI: 33.42-51.91) for DCR, +19.65 (95% CI: 10.33-28.97) for lid tightening, +16.06 (95% CI: 2.65-29.48) for punctoplasty, and +26.53 (95% CI: 13.15-39.90) for the combined group, demonstrating a positive change in health status for all groups. There was negative correlation between total GBI and post-operative Munk scores (r=-0.58, P<0.001), and positive correlation between Lac-Q and Munk scores (r=0.65, P<0.001).ConclusionPatients derived significant improvement in symptoms and health-related quality of life benefit following all surgical interventions for epiphora.

Assessment of patient satisfaction following external versus transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy with a diode laser and evaluation if change in quality of life after simultaneous bilateral surgery in patients with bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

AIM: To compare patient satisfaction and experience after external dacryocystorhinostomy (EX-DCR) versus transcanalicular DCR (TC-DCR) with a diode laser and to evaluate the change in quality of life following simultaneous bilateral DCR. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 38 eyes of 19 patients with bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) who underwent TC-DCR for the right eye (Group 1) and EX-DCR for the left eye (Group 2) simultaneously. The subjective outcomes (tearing, irritation, pain, discharge, swelling, and change in visual acuity) of the patients in the two groups at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months were compared using a questionnaire. The patients answered the questions in the Glascow Benefit Inventory (GBI) to evaluate the change in quality of life after simultaneous bilateral DCR at 1 month and 3 months. The symptom scores were compared between Group 1 and Group 2 using a Mann-Whitney test. The Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison of intragroup differences. RESULTS: The overall symptom scores significantly improved in both groups. The overall symptom score and six ocular symptom scores did not show a significant difference between the two groups at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Quality of life of the patients significantly improved after simultaneous bilateral surgery according to GBI scoring at 1 month and 3 months. CONCLUSION: The subjective outcomes significantly improved in similar ways after successful TC-DCR and EX-DCR during the early postoperative period. Our study shows that simultaneous bilateral DCR confers a significant quality of life improvement.