Inherited retinal degeneration current genetics practices - a needs assessment.

BACKGROUND: Clinical assessment of patients with IRD often includes thorough documentation of medical and ocular history in addition to genetics related practices like assessing the family history and genetic testing. Previous studies have demonstrated the genetic counseling needs of IRD patients are not being fully met, but there is a lack of literature showing the current genetics practices of ophthalmologists and optometrists in the U.S. The goal of this study is to assess the current genetics related practices being provided to patients with IRD. METHODS: Data from 51 survey participants were included in the analysis. The survey assessed their current practices of risk counseling to patients with IRD, their confidence level of ocular genetics, and resources they may utilize in the future. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative data while data from open ended responses were coded using thematic analysis generated through grounded theory. RESULTS: Responses suggest some discussion of genetics is occurring with IRD patients. However, there are limitations to these discussions given time constraints and lack of understanding of the genetics of IRDs and available testing. The study also revealed that there are minimal referrals to genetic counseling being made at this time, though there is interest in working with genetic counselors. Additionally, there is a need for continued education regarding the genetics related to IRDs. CONCLUSION: Future larger-scale studies are warranted to provide additional insight into these genetics related practices and where genetic counselors are needed in this field.

Psychosocial assessment of potential retinal prosthesis trial participants.

BACKGROUND: As the field of retinal prostheses advances, volunteers are required for device trials, and optimal participant recruitment is vital for intervention success. The aims of this study were: (i) to select tests that assess the psychosocial aspects of visual impairment and develop a psychosocial assessment protocol for persons who may be eligible for participation in retinal prostheses trials; (ii) to investigate correlations between these tests; and (iii) to determine associations between psychosocial factors and a person's interest in participating in a retinal prosthesis (bionic eye) trial. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 72 adults with advanced retinal degeneration. Questionnaire assessments included personality, cognitive ability, social-support, self-efficacy, coping, optimism, depression, and quality of life (Impact of Vision Impairment Profile ([IVI], and Vision and Quality of Life Index [VisQoL]). Level of interest in a retinal prosthesis was also evaluated. RESULTS: All questionnaires were completed without floor or ceiling effects and with minimal respondent burden. Depression correlated with decreased quality of life (rho = -0.37 and 0.40, p < 0.001 for IVI and VisQoL, respectively). Together, depression, gender and vision-specific coping explained 35.2 per cent of variance in IVI quality of life (p < 0.001). Forty-nine per cent of participants were interested in a retinal prosthesis now and 77 per cent in the future. Although the personality trait of 'openness' was somewhat predictive of interest in retinal prostheses (odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.97), neither severity of vision impairment nor any of the psychosocial measures were strong predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Several existing psychosocial questionnaires can be used for patients with advanced retinal degeneration and may be useful in exploring suitability for a retinal prosthesis or evaluating outcomes. However, the questionnaires used in this study were not good predictors of whether or not a person might be interested in a retinal prosthesis.