Assessment of Swallowing Function in Healthy Adults While Using High-Flow Nasal Cannula.

OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for respiratory support, the effect of HFNC on swallowing physiology is poorly understood. Flow rates that permit safe swallowing have not been established. We aim to assess if healthy individuals have diminished swallowing function and safety at high flow rates. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measures with planned data collection. SETTING: Outpatient dysphagia clinic. METHODS: Swallowing function in a cohort of healthy individuals was assessed using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). Participants' safety of swallowing was assessed with different textures under randomized rates of HFNC (0, 30, 40, 50, and 60 LPM). Swallowing trials included quantities of thin liquids, mildly-thick liquids, and purees. Trials were scored using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Pearson chi-square tests were used to test for correlation between PAS result, flow rate, and consistency across each quantity of material. RESULTS: Twenty-seven subjects were enrolled. Forty-one percent were male with mean age of 34 years (11 standard deviation). Ninety-nine percent (267/270), 97% (n = 263/270), and 99% (399/405) of 1 sip swallows, 3 sip swallows, and 5 mL swallows, respectively, were safe. There was no significant correlation between swallow safety and flow rate using Pearson Chi-Square test across all consistencies and across all quantities of materials (P > 0.05). Of note, out of all subtrials, the thin liquid, 3 sips trial at 60 LPM, had the largest percent of unsafe swallows (14%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest rate of aspiration is not significantly affected by high flow nasal cannula in healthy individuals.

Swallowing dysfunctions in patients with disorders of consciousness: Evidence from neuroimaging data, assessment, and management.

Following severe brain injuries, a subset of patients may remain in an altered state of consciousness; most of these patients require artificial feeding. Currently, a functional oral phase and the presence of exclusive oral feeding may constitute signs of consciousness. Additionally, the presence of pharyngo-laryngeal secretions, saliva aspiration, cough reflex and tracheostomy are related to the level of consciousness. However, the link between swallowing and consciousness is yet to be fully understood. The primary aim of this review is to establish a comprehensive overview of the relationship between an individual's conscious behaviour and swallowing (reflexive and voluntary). Previous studies of brain activation during volitional and non-volitional swallowing tasks in healthy subjects are also reviewed. We demonstrate that the areas activated by voluntary swallowing tasks (primary sensorimotor, cingulate, insula, premotor, supplementary motor, cerebellum, and operculum) are not specific to deglutitive function but are shared with other motor tasks and brain networks involved in consciousness. This review also outlines suitable assessment and treatment methods for dysphagic patients with disorders of consciousness. Finally, we propose that markers of swallowing could contribute to the development of novel diagnostic guidelines for patients with disorders of consciousness.

Oral Intake Difficulty and Aspiration Pneumonia Assessment Using High-Resolution Manometry.

OBJECTIVE: The sequential generation of swallowing pressure (SP) from the nasopharynx to the proximal esophagus is important for the bolus to pass from the oral cavity to the esophagus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of the SP sequence mode on high-resolution manometry (HRM) with oral intake difficulty and aspiration pneumonia. METHODS: Consecutive patients with dysphagia who were admitted to our dysphagia clinic between November 2016 and November 2020 were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. We classified the HRM pressure topography data according to the SP sequence mode into type A, normal; B, partially decreased; C, totally decreased; and D, sequence disappeared, and according to the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) during pharyngeal swallowing into type 1, flattening and 2, non-flattening. Clinical dysphagia severity was determined based on oral intake difficulty and aspiration pneumonia. RESULTS: In total, 202 patients with dysphagia (mean [standard deviation] age, 68.3 [14.5] years; 140 [69.8%] male) were enrolled. Type C (odds ratio [OR], 10.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.89-51.45), type D (OR, 19.90; 95% CI, 4.18-122.35), and type 2 (OR, 6.36; 95% CI, 2.88-14.57) were significantly related to oral intake difficulty. Type C (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.08-11.12) and type 2 (OR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.95-9.15) were significantly associated with aspiration pneumonia. CONCLUSION: The failure of sequential generation of SP was associated with higher risk of oral intake difficulty and aspiration pneumonia. These assessments are useful in understanding the pathophysiology and severity of dysphagia and in selecting safety nutritional management methods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2127-2135, 2024.

Correlation between findings of the oral myofunctional clinical assessment, pressure and electromyographic activity of the tongue during swallowing in individuals with different orofacial myofunctional disorders. / Correlação entre achados da avaliação clínica miofuncional orofacial, a pressão e a atividade eletromiográfica da língua na deglutição em indivíduos com diferentes alterações da motricidade orofacial.

PURPOSE: To correlate the findings regarding the myofunctional orofacial examination, tongue pressure and surface electromyography (sEMG) of deglutition in individuals with different orofacial myofunctional disorders. METHODS: 44 patients (20 males and 24 females, aged between 17 and 63 years old) with different orofacial myofunctional changes were clinically assessed using the Expanded Protocol of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES-E). In addition, the range of mandibular movements and facial anthropometry were measured, along with the assessment of the tongue pressure (tip and dorsum) and of the electrical activity of the suprahyoid muscles during deglutition, using surface electromyography (sEMG). RESULTS: The statistical analysis found weak correlations between tongue dorsum pressure values, suggesting that the greater the measurement of the lower third of the face, the lower the pressure of the tongue dorsum; the greater the measurement of the overlaps (vertical and horizontal), the higher the pressure of the tongue dorsum; the higher the score from the orofacial evaluation and orofacial functions assessment, the higher the pressure of the tongue dorsum; and the higher the pressure of the tongue dorsum, the higher the pressure of the tongue tip. CONCLUSION: The present study results indicate that the orofacial myofunctional changes found in different groups of patients are more related to the maxillomandibular discrepancies than to the pathologies investigated herein.

OBJETIVO: correlacionar os achados da avaliação clínica miofuncional orofacial, pressão de língua e da eletromiografia de superfície (EMGs) da deglutição de grupos de pacientes com diferentes alterações da motricidade orofacial. MÉTODO: 44 pacientes (20 homens e 24 mulheres com idades entre 17 e 63 anos), com diferentes alterações miofuncionais orofaciais foram avaliados por meio da Avaliação Miofuncional Orofacial com Escores Expandido (AMIOFE-E), avaliação da amplitude mandibular e antropometria facial, mensuração da pressão de língua (ponta e dorso) e exame de Eletromiografia de Superfície (EMGs) em região supra hioidea na tarefa de deglutição de saliva e diferentes volumes de água. RESULTADOS: a análise estatística encontrou algumas correlações fracas que envolvem a pressão do dorso de língua e sugerem que quanto maior for a medida do terço inferior, menor será a pressão do dorso da língua; quanto maior for a medida dos trespasses (vertical e horizontal) maior será a pressão do dorso da língua; quanto maior for a pontuação da avaliação de postura e funções orofaciais, maior será a pressão do dorso de língua e quanto maior for a pressão do dorso de língua, maior será a pressão da ponta da língua. CONCLUSÃO: os resultados sugerem que as alterações miofuncionais orofaciais encontradas nos diferentes grupos de pacientes estão mais relacionadas às discrepâncias maxilomandibulares do que às patologias pesquisadas no presente estudo.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability for Predicting Dysphagia in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders.

Dysphagia occurs in various diseases and constitutes a major concern in patients with psychiatric disorders. The Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA) comprises 24 clinical parameters designed to identify swallowing disorders. One item in MASA, the "gag reflex", involves an unpleasant stimulus, which means that it is often omitted when the test is administered. The aims of this study were to determine the presence/absence of dysphagia in patients with psychiatric disorders using the MASA and determine its diagnostic accuracy when the gag reflex item was excluded in patients with psychiatric disorders. The study participants comprised patients admitted to a hospital psychiatric ward in whom dysphagia had been suspected based on oral intake status. The following items were determined: age, total MASA score (23 out of 24 items, giving a score out of 195 points), body mass index score, milligram equivalents of chlorpromazine, and the Food Intake Level Scale score. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of swallowing problems as assessed by videoendoscopic or videofluoroscopic examination. The scores for each item investigated in the MASA, including the total score, were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was carried out to determine the optimum cut-off value. The total MASA score, which excluded the "gag reflex" item, was lower in the problematic swallowing group than in the non-problematic swallowing group. The MASA scores for cooperation, respiratory, dysphasia, tongue coordination, oral preparation, pharyngeal phase, and pharyngeal response tended to be lower in the problematic swallowing group. Furthermore, an optimum cut-off value of 169 points (sensitivity, 0.92; specificity, 0.68; likelihood ratio, 2.84) was identified. These results indicate that the cut-off MASA score is effective in screening for dysphagia, even when the "gag reflex" item is excluded.

In situ quantitative assessment of food oral processing parameters: A review of feasible techniques and devices.

Oral processing is a combination of various actions, the detailed description of which has always been the subject of relevant research. By means of imaging technology and sensory evaluation, more knowledge of oral processing have been accumulated. Presently, the advances in sensory technology have added quantitative parameters to the qualitative description of oral processing, which also enriched the specifics of each action. Previous studies have shown that oral processing includes lip closure, dental occlusion, masticatory muscles activity, tongue movement, and swallowing, whose processing contains rich information such as the movement of organ and the intensity of organ contacts. "Quantification" was taken in this review as the basic feature of in situ detection information, the relevant parameters and feasible methods for the quantitative description of each activity was recorded in detail. In addition, basic problems and feasible optimization schemes of the existing in situ detection device are also proposed in the hope of promoting the development of in situ detection device thus providing available information for the description of oral processing.

Assessment and treatment of neurogenic dysphagia in stroke and Parkinson's disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neurogenic dysphagia worsens quality of life and prognosis of patients with different neurological disorders. Management of neurogenic dysphagia can be challenging. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current evidence on screening, diagnosis, and treatment of neurogenic dysphagia in stroke and Parkinson's disease, suggesting clues for clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: The pros and cons of diagnostic techniques are discussed in the light of updated evidence. Findings from recent meta-analyses of different treatment approaches, including traditional dysphagia therapy, peripheral and central neurostimulation techniques, and treatment with botulinum toxin, are critically discussed, emphasizing inconsistencies and controversial issues. SUMMARY: Screening tests and clinical swallow examination should be routinely performed in neurological patients at risk for dysphagia. In patients testing positive for dysphagia, first-line instrumental investigations, represented by fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing or videofluoroscopic swallow study, should be performed to confirm the presence of dysphagia, to assess its severity, and to inform the treatment. Second-line and third-line instrumental methods can be used in selected patients to clarify specific pathophysiological aspects of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Treatment strategies should be personalized, and combination of traditional dysphagia therapy with innovative treatment approaches may increase the chance of restoring effective and safe swallowing.

Non-invasive assessment of swallowing using flexible high-density electromyography arrays.

Swallowing is a vital function that serves to safely transport food and fluid to the stomach, while simultaneously protecting our airways. Evaluation of swallowing is important for the diagnosis and rehabilitation of individuals with dysphagia, a disorder of swallowing. Flexible high-density surface electromyography (HD sEMG) arrays were designed and fabricated to span the floor of mouth and neck muscles. These arrays were applied on 6 healthy participants over duplicate recording sessions. During each recording session, participants performed three different swallowing motor tasks. The HD sEMG signals were filtered and tasks extracted. For each task, the RMS amplitude was computed, visualized, and compared. Dynamic motor coordination was evident in the filtered signals traces, with different electrode locations showing unique temporal activations. The 2D topographical maps allowed the location of different RMS intensities to be visualized, revealing qualitatively similar patterns across participants and tasks. These motor task trends were also seen within RMS quantifications. The RMS metric across all participants identified significant differences between non-effortful 3 ml and effortful 3 ml swallow tasks ( p=0.006) and there was a minimal variation of 3.1±1.9 µV RMS for repeated recording sessions by each participant. The HD-sEMG array successfully recorded differences in muscle activations during swallowing and was able to discern between two different motor tasks. The arrays offers a spatially detailed non-invasive assessment of the neuromuscular performance of swallowing. Clinical Relevance- The utility of HD-sEMG arrays for evaluation of the muscles involved in swallowing could enable diagnosis and rehabilitation of individuals with dysphagia.

Accuracy of Dysphagia Standard Assessment (DSA®) bedside screening test: a flowchart for patient eligibility.

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) screening tests have improved patient management; however, the complex applicability and high percentage of false negatives do not allow these tests to be considered completely reliable if not supported by an instrumental investigation. The aim of the present study is to evaluate an OD screening test, the Dysphagia Standard Assessment (DSA®) with different volumes and viscosities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study of 72 patients evaluated for suspected OD through a double-blind methodology conducted by two operators. All patients underwent fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) as a reference test and a separate DSA® test. DSA® was performed by administering boluses with different viscosities, with the signal of interruption of the test being: onset of the cough reflex, wet voice after swallowing, and/or desaturation of O2 ≥ 5%. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was evaluated by FEES. The cut-off identified to diagnose OD was PAS ≥ 3. RESULTS: The test showed an accuracy of 82%, a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% C.I. 0.84-0.97), and a specificity of 0.78 (95% C.I. 0.67-0.87); positive predictive value 0.55 (95% C.I. 0.43-0.67); negative predictive value 0.97 (95% C.I. 0.90-0.99), positive likelihood ratio 4.37 (95% C.I. 3.6-5.2); likelihood negative ratio 0.08 (95% C.I. 0.06-0.09). CONCLUSIONS: According to the preliminary results, the test showed good outcomes in determining the presence or absence of OD with a wide spectrum of applicability with some limitations that could be overcome by the selection of a target population. For this reason, a flowchart to address patient eligibility was developed.

Longitudinal dysphagia assessment in adult patients with nephropathic cystinosis using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Nephropathic cystinosis is a lysosomal storage disorder with known myopathic features, including dysphagia. Evaluation of oropharyngeal swallowing physiology can be standardized using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP), a validated assessment tool used to analyze and rate swallowing across 17 distinct physiologic domains. Our objective was to better characterize swallowing impairments in nephropathic cystinosis using MBSImP analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 40 video fluoroscopic swallowing studies performed at two time points over 1 y in patients with nephropathic cystinosis with various levels of oral and pharyngeal stage dysphagia. Patients completed two self-administered dysphagia outcome measures (the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory [MDADI] and the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool [EAT-10]). RESULTS: We demonstrated oral stage and pharyngeal stage dysphagia across domains that impacted bolus control, transit, and clearance through both the oral cavity and pharyngeal lumen. Also captured were deficits related to onset and completeness of laryngeal closure that impact airway protection during swallow. There were significant correlations between pharyngeal total score and EAT-10 (r = 0.5, p < 0.001) and between oral total score and EAT-10 (r = 0.7, p < 0.001), MDADI-e (r = -0.6, p < 0.001), MDADI-p (r = -0.5, p < 0.001) and MDADI-c (r = -0.6, p < 0.001). There were no differences in oral or pharyngeal total scores across the 1-y time span. DISCUSSION: This study identifies oral and pharyngeal stage dysphagia as crucial to patients with nephropathic cystinosis and paves the path for future studies of treatment targets.

Swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: Validity and reliability of a pocket-sized ultrasound system.

BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound as an adjunct to clinical swallowing evaluation provides quantitative physiological and morphological data. As a low-risk procedure, ultrasound imaging can be performed outside of a medical setting. This is particularly important for patients living in rural areas with restricted access to a hospital. Technical advances have produced pocket-sized ultrasound technology that is more affordable, and therefore within the fiscal reach of most allied health services. AIMS: To explore the validity and reliability of pocket-sized ultrasound technology in dysphagia assessment. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Data were acquired from 43 patients with dysphagia using the Clarius ultrasound device. Ultrasound and videofluoroscopic measures of hyoid and laryngeal displacement during liquid and puree swallowing were collected concurrently to quantify correlation and agreement between identical measures derived from the two instruments. Reliability of ultrasound was assessed for measures of hyoid and laryngeal displacement, tongue thickness, and size of the submental muscles in eight patients. Reliability was evaluated for the entire process of data acquisition including scanning and online measurement using an iPad in a clinical setting and for offline measurement on a computer screen to explore environmental influences on reliability. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Results revealed poor correlation between the measures of interest across instruments. Reliability of the entire process of data acquisition in a clinical setting was insufficient while reliability was more promising for offline measurements. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The clinical use of pocket-sized ultrasound devices, such as the Clarius system, for swallowing evaluation is not indicated at this time. Enhanced validity and reliability of the entire process of data acquisition are needed prior to clinical translation of such technology. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject The use of ultrasound allows for radiation-free, non-invasive swallowing assessment. Some data suggest that ultrasound is valid and reliable in the evaluation of swallowing using standard-sized equipment. Insufficient validity and reliability have been reported for pocket-sized ultrasound technology in the assessment of healthy swallowing. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This research is the first to provide validity and reliability data of the pocket-sized Clarius technology in the evaluation of swallowing in patients with dysphagia. Insufficient validity and reliability of online data acquisition in a clinical environment were found. Reliability for offline measurement was more promising. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The clinical use of pocket-sized ultrasound devices, such as the Clarius system, for swallowing assessment is not indicated at this time.

Finnish Version of the Eating Assessment Tool (F-EAT-10): A Valid and Reliable Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Dysphagia Evaluation.

Our aim was to validate a Finnish version of the Eating Assessment Tool (F-EAT-10) for clinical use and to test its reliability and validity in a multicenter nationwide study. Normative data were acquired from 180 non-dysphagic participants (median age 57.0 years, 62.2% female). Dysphagia patients (n = 117, median age 69.7 years, 53.0% female) referred to fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) completed F-EAT-10 before the examination and after 2 weeks. Patients underwent the 100-ml water swallow test (WST) and FEES was evaluated using the following three scales: the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale, Penetration-Aspiration Scale, and the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale. An operative cohort of 19 patients (median age 75.8 years, 57.9% female) underwent an endoscopic operation on Zenker's diverticulum, tight cricopharyngeal muscle diagnosed in videofluorography, or both. Patients completed the F-EAT-10 preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The cut-off score for controls was < 3 (sensitivity 94.0%, specificity 96.1%) suggesting that ≥ 3 is abnormal. Re-questionnaires for test-retest reliability analysis were available from 92 FEES patients and 123 controls. The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent for the total F-EAT-10 score (0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.95). Pearson correlation coefficients were strong (p < 0.001) for each of the questions and the total score. Internal consistency as assessed by Cronbach's alpha was excellent (0.95). Some correlations between findings in FEES and 100-ml WST with F-EAT-10 were observed. The change in subjective symptoms of operative patients paralleled the change in F-EAT-10. F-EAT-10 is a reliable, valid, and symptom-specific patient-reported outcome measure for assessing dysphagia among Finnish speakers.

White Paper by the European Society for Swallowing Disorders: Screening and Non-instrumental Assessment for Dysphagia in Adults.

This White Paper by the European Society for Swallowing Disorders (ESSD) reports on the current state of screening and non-instrumental assessment for dysphagia in adults. An overview is provided on the measures that are available, and how to select screening tools and assessments. Emphasis is placed on different types of screening, patient-reported measures, assessment of anatomy and physiology of the swallowing act, and clinical swallowing evaluation. Many screening and non-instrumental assessments are available for evaluating dysphagia in adults; however, their use may not be warranted due to poor diagnostic performance or lacking robust psychometric properties. This white paper provides recommendations on how to select best evidence-based screening tools and non-instrumental assessments for use in clinical practice targeting different constructs, target populations and respondents, based on criteria for diagnostic performance, psychometric properties (reliability, validity, and responsiveness), and feasibility. In addition, gaps in research that need to be addressed in future studies are discussed. The following recommendations are made: (1) discontinue the use of non-validated dysphagia screening tools and assessments; (2) implement screening using tools that have optimal diagnostic performance in selected populations that are at risk of dysphagia, such as stroke patients, frail older persons, patients with progressive neurological diseases, persons with cerebral palsy, and patients with head and neck cancer; (3) implement measures that demonstrate robust psychometric properties; and (4) provide quality training in dysphagia screening and assessment to all clinicians involved in the care and management of persons with dysphagia.

Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility.

The Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). A key feature of CCv.4.0 is the more rigorous and expansive protocol that incorporates single wet swallows acquired in different positions (supine, upright) and provocative testing, including multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge. Additionally, solid bolus swallows, solid test meal, and/or pharmacologic provocation can be used to identify clinically relevant motility disorders and other conditions (eg, rumination) that occur during and after meals. The acquisition and analysis for performing these tests and the evidence supporting their inclusion in the Chicago Classification protocol is detailed in this technical review. Provocative tests are designed to increase the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of HRM studies for disorders of esophageal motility. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification, decrease the proportion of HRM studies that deliver inconclusive diagnoses and increase the number of patients with a clinically relevant diagnosis that can direct effective therapy. Another aim in establishing a standard manometry protocol for motility laboratories around the world is to facilitate procedural consistency, improve diagnostic reliability, and promote collaborative research.

Assessment of the Multiple Rapid Swallows Test for Gauging Esophageal Reflux Burden in Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

BACKGROUND The multiple rapid swallows (MRS) test is used to assess esophageal contraction reserve. In this study, we characterized the expression of the MRS test in patients with reflux burden and other symptomatic phenotypes with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with rGERD who underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring (EIM) between September 2018 and January 2020 were retrospectively studied. RESULTS We enrolled 151 patients and divided them into 4 phenotypes according to the results of EIM. In phenotype 1, the MRS distal contractile integral (DCI) was significantly positively correlated with acid-liquid reflux episodes. In phenotype 2, lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LES) length was significantly positively correlated with MRS DCI, and MRS/single-swallow (SS) DCI ratio. In phenotype 3, MRS DCI was negatively correlated with the DeMeester score, acid exposure time (AET), upright AET, long-term acid reflux episodes, acid-mixed reflux episodes, recumbent acid reflux episodes, and total acid reflux episodes. There was a significant negative correlation between MRS/SS DCI and recumbent acid reflux episodes. In phenotype 4, nonacid-liquid episodes and recumbent nonacid reflux episodes were significantly higher in the abnormal MRS group. However, acid-gas episodes, weakly acid-gas episodes, and upright gas reflux episodes were higher in the normal MRS group than in the abnormal MRS group. CONCLUSIONS Esophageal contraction reserve is heterogeneous within the reflux burden and symptomatic phenotypes of patients with rGERD.

Texture and texture assessment of thickened fluids and texture-modified food for dysphagia management.

Thickened fluids and texture-modified foods are commonly used in the medical management of individuals who suffer from swallowing difficulty (known as dysphagia). However, how to reliably assess texture properties of such food systems is still a big challenge both to industry and to academic researchers. This article aims to identify key physical parameters that are important for objective assessment of such properties by reviewing the significance of rheological or textural properties of thickened fluids and texture-modified foods for swallowing. Literature reviews have identified that dominating textural properties in relation to swallowing could be very different for thickened fluids and for texture-modified foods. Important parameters of thickened fluids are generally related with the flow of the bolus in the pharyngeal stage, while important parameters of texture-modified foods are generally related with the bolus preparation in the oral stage as well as the bolus flow in the pharyngeal stage. This review helps to identify key textural parameters of thickened fluids and texture-modified foods in relation to eating and swallowing and to develop objective measuring techniques for quality control of thickened fluids and texture-modified foods for dysphagia management.

Aspects of the assessment and management of pharyngoesophageal dysphagia.

Swallowing complaints are common and may have significant consequences for nutrition and pulmonary health. Etiology varies and different aspects of the deglutitive system may be affected. A thorough assessment from the oral cavity to the stomach will provide physiologic information that enables specific targeted management plans to be devised. Although the swallow trajectory bridges anatomic areas, there has previously been a tendency to compartmentalize assessment and treatment by arbitrary anatomic boundaries. It is now clear that this approach fails to appreciate the complexity of swallow mechanics and that systems (oral, pharyngeal, esophageal, and pulmonary) are intertwined and codependent. Swallowing specialists from different backgrounds and with complementary skill sets form a multidisciplinary team that can provide insight and address multiple areas of management. With the advent of new tools for instrumental evaluation, such as manometry, targeted rehabilitative strategies can be informed by physiology, increased in precision and breadth, and assessed quantitatively. Surgical approaches have evolved toward endoscopic techniques, and food technology is expanding options in dietary management. The multidisciplinary team is core to managing this varied and often neglected patient population. This review is for clinicians treating swallowing disorders and will explore the selected aspects of the assessment and management of pharyngoesophageal swallowing disorders.

Utility of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) in Evaluating Self-Reported Dysphagia Associated with Oral Frailty in Japanese Community-Dwelling Older People.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to verify the associations between dysphagia as screened by the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) and indicators in the 100-mL water swallowing test (WST) or medical history among community-dwelling older people. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study participants were 202 community-dwelling older Japanese adults aged ≥65 years. MEASUREMENTS: We investigated the participants' basic attributes, including age, sex, body mass index, medical history (cerebrovascular disease, respiratory disease: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], and history of pneumonia within the previous year), and number of prescribed medications. Dysphagia assessment was performed using the EAT-10 and the 100-mL WST as subjective and objective examinations, respectively. The 100-mL WST used four indicators (SC: swallowing capacity, VS: volume per swallow, TS: time per swallow, and choking signs). Patients with and without dysphagia according to the EAT-10 were divided into two groups according to a cutoff score of 3, and the two groups were then compared in terms of their characteristics including medical history and 100-mL WST indicators. A multiple logistic regression model was used to determine whether the indicators of the 100-mL WST or medical history were independently associated with dysphagia in the EAT-10. RESULTS: The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that dysphagia in the EAT-10 was independently associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98-7.90), COPD (OR = 14.68; 95% CI = 3.14-68.85), and VS and TS in the 100-mL WST (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.80-0.90 and OR = 3.03; 95% CI = 1.78-5.16, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that the EAT-10 was independently associated with the 100-mL WST and respiratory disease. We propose that swallowing rehabilitation incorporating respiratory training could be effective for older people screened using the EAT-10.

Economic costs of dysphagia among hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Difficulties swallowing may lead to aspiration pneumonia and death. In a hospital setting where patients are admitted for other causes, we hypothesized that the additional burden of a swallow problem would increase length of stay, rate of pneumonia, cost, readmissions, and morbidity compared to those without dysphagia. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective parallel cohort study. METHODS: A study of patients admitted to the hospital with hip/femur fracture was completed. Two groups were identified and compared: those with a coded diagnosis of dysphagia (n = 165) in addition to hip/femur fracture (HF + D), and a group with hip fracture alone (HF-D) (n = 2,288) (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification). Number of inpatient days, cost per patient, diagnosis of pneumonia, 30-day readmission, and mortality rates were compared. RESULTS: For those in the HF + D group, mean age was 85 years compared to 78 years in the HF-D group (P < .05); length of stay was 32 days, more than twice that of the HF-D group (14 days) (P < .05). Mortality within 30 days of admission was significantly higher (18% vs. 4%,respectively) but 30-day readmission rate was similar (8% vs. 11%, respectively). Rate of aspiration pneumonia was 14 times greater in HF + D (9.7%) compared with HF-D (0.7%). Average admission cost was NZD$36,913 (HF + D) compared with NZD$22,222 (HF-D) (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Complaint of dysphagia, in addition to hip fracture, increases a patient's average admission cost by 60%. It is associated with increased aspiration pneumonia and greater mortality. Dysphagia screening at admission to hospital would allow early identification of swallow compromise and may prevent complications and reduce costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b Laryngoscope, 130:974-979, 2020.

Objective Assessment of Postoperative Swallowing Difficulty Through Ultrasound in Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy.

Swallowing discomfort is a common postoperative complaint in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Contraction of the strap muscles might cause resistance to elevation of the laryngotracheal unit, and downward movement of the laryngotracheal unit may lead to swallowing discomfort. However, few studies have evaluated the mechanism related to limited laryngotracheal elevation after thyroidectomy. We aimed to objectively verify the presence of postoperative impaired laryngotracheal elevation through ultrasound evaluation in patients undergoing thyroidectomy and evaluate its relationship with limitation of laryngotracheal elevation. This is a prospective clinical study. Among patients undergoing hemithyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy, the patients who were followed up for ≥ 6 months were selected (N = 40). Ultrasound evaluation was done preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Laryngotracheal movement was recorded and the length of elevation was measured. Symptom after thyroidectomy was evaluated through swallowing-related items of thyroidectomy-related voice questionnaire. Ultrasound evaluation verified the presence of limited laryngotracheal elevation postoperatively in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. After thyroidectomy, the swallowing-related score was significantly increased, and was recovered time-dependently at 1 month. Laryngotracheal elevation showed significant decrease after thyroidectomy. The symptom score of swallowing was significantly correlated with the length of laryngotracheal elevation. Post-thyroidectomy ultrasound evaluation verified that laryngotracheal elevation was significantly impaired. Presence of adhesion between the laryngotracheal unit and the superficial soft tissue was the probable cause of the limitation at 6 months after thyroidectomy. The length of laryngotracheal elevation was related to the symptom score of swallowing after thyroid surgery.