Multidetector-row computed tomography assessment of adding budesonide/formoterol to tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) showed that tiotropium dilated the inner diameters in airways from the third to the sixth generation of the bronchi. Here we aimed to evaluate the morphological effect by adding a budesonide/formoterol combination to tiotropium in COPD patients using three-dimensional MDCT. METHODS: Pulmonary function tests, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and MDCT imaging studies were performed at the beginning and after budesonide/formoterol combination treatment for 12 weeks in 14 patients with COPD. RESULTS: The median age was 73.5 years and the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) as a percentage of the predicted value was 57.2 ± 18.3%. The luminal area in the fifth generation bronchi and the emphysema volume/CT-derived total lung volume were significantly correlated with FEV1 at baseline (r = 0.682, p < 0.02 and r = -0.868, p < 0.001, respectively). The average luminal area and wall area percentage in the third, fourth and fifth generations were correlated with the SGRQ total score. Budesonide/formoterol induced insignificant pulmonary function changes and significant symptoms improvement. CT images showed an increased inner luminal area and decreased wall area after budesonide/formoterol treatment. Average luminal area was significantly increased from 24.3 ± 9.7 to 26.0 ± 9.9 mm(2) in the third generation, 13.0 ± 6.5 to 14.7 ± 7.3 mm(2) in the fourth generation, 8.0 ± 4.8 to 9.4 ± 4.9 mm(2) in the fifth generation and 5.6 ± 2.7 to 6.7 ± 3.6 mm(2) in the sixth generation (p < 0.01). The average increase of the third generation luminal area was correlated with the FEV1 increase (r = 0.632, p < 0.03). The wall area percentage significantly decreased from 51.5 ± 9.2 to 49.1 ± 9.7 in the third generation, 56.1 ± 9.7 to 53.0 ± 11.1 in the fourth generation, and 62.3 ± 9.9 to 57.6 ± 9.8 in the fifth generation (p < 0.05). Emphysema volume/CT-derived total lung volume was unchanged with treatment. CONCLUSION: MDCT demonstrated budesonide/formoterol induced bronchodilation in the non-small airway. CT imaging can evaluate drug therapeutic effect and may provide additional insights into pharmacotherapy for COPD.

Computed tomography assessment of pharmacological lung volume reduction induced by bronchodilators in COPD.

Pharmacological lung volume reduction in COPD is an important goal in treatment with long-acting bronchodilators because in addition to airflow limitation, lung hyperinflation considerably affects COPD symptoms. Quantitative computed tomography (CT) simultaneously provides structural information about airway dimensions, emphysematous changes, and lung volumes, some of which are difficult to be evaluated by pulmonary function. Here, we evaluated changes in CT parameters and pulmonary function in 30 patients with COPD who underwent CT scans before and one year after starting tiotropium treatment and in 12 patients with COPD who were not treated with long-acting bronchodilators. Baseline pulmonary function and CT parameters did not differ between the two groups. One-year tiotropium therapy improved physiological-indices including residual volume (RV) and ratio of RV to total lung capacity (RV/TLC) (-235 mL, p = 0.005, and -2.9%, p = 0.0001, respectively), and CT-indices including wall area percent (WA%) and inner luminal area in right upper lobe apical and lower lobe basal segmental bronchi (-1.59%, p = 0.01, 2.27 mm(2), p = 0.0005; and -1.33%, p = 0.0008, 3.42 mm(2), p < 0.0001, respectively), low attenuation volume (LAV) and total lung volume (CT-TLV) (-92 mL, p = 0.0003, and -211 mL, p = 0.002, respectively). Changes in LAV, CT-TLV, RV, and RV/TLC were significantly greater in the tiotropium, than the non-bronchodilator group. The tiotropium-induced reduction in LAV correlated with the decrease in RV (ρ = 0.45, p = 0.01). Our findings not only indicate the value of the comprehensive CT measurements in assessing the effects of bronchodilators, including pharmacological lung volume reduction, but also further understanding of the structural changes underlying physiological improvements induced by bronchodilators.

Tiotropium bromide inhalation powder: a review of its use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The anticholinergic agent tiotropium bromide (Spiriva®) is a long-acting bronchodilator that is indicated for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of tiotropium bromide inhalation powder, administered using the HandiHaler® device, in patients with COPD, as well as reviewing its pharmacological properties and the results of pharmacoeconomic analyses. Shorter-term placebo-controlled trials in patients with COPD demonstrated significantly higher trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) responses with tiotropium bromide than with placebo, confirming it has a duration of action of ≥24 hours and is suitable for once-daily administration. Lung function improved to a greater extent with tiotropium bromide than with ipratropium bromide or, in most instances, salmeterol. Indacaterol was shown to be noninferior to tiotropium bromide in terms of the trough FEV(1) response. The large, 4-year UPLIFT® trial did not show a significant reduction in the annual rate of decline in FEV(1) with tiotropium bromide versus placebo in patients with COPD, although subgroup analyses demonstrated a significantly lower rate of decline with tiotropium bromide than with placebo in some patient groups (e.g. patients with moderate COPD, patients aged ≥50 years, patients not receiving maintenance therapy at baseline). Tiotropium bromide prevented exacerbations in patients with COPD, with a significantly lower exacerbation rate and a significantly longer time to first exacerbation seen with tiotropium bromide than with placebo or salmeterol. Exacerbation rates did not significantly differ between patients receiving tiotropium bromide and those receiving salmeterol/fluticasone propionate. Tiotropium bromide also had beneficial effects on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and other endpoints, such as dyspnoea and rescue medication use. Combination therapy with tiotropium bromide plus formoterol with or without budesonide improved lung function to a significantly greater extent than tiotropium bromide alone in patients with COPD. In addition, exacerbation rates were lower and HR-QOL was improved with tiotropium bromide plus budesonide/formoterol versus tiotropium bromide alone. Although the addition of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate to tiotropium bromide did not reduce the COPD exacerbation rate, it did improve lung function and HR-QOL. Tiotropium bromide inhalation powder is generally well tolerated in patients with COPD, with anticholinergic adverse events (e.g. dry mouth, constipation, gastrointestinal obstruction, dysuria) among the most commonly reported adverse events. The UPLIFT® trial showed no significant difference between tiotropium bromide and placebo recipients in the risk of stroke, and the risk of serious cardiac adverse events (including congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction) was significantly lower with tiotropium bromide than with placebo. The absence of a detrimental effect on cardiovascular outcomes was supported by the results of a meta-analysis and pooled analyses. In addition, on-treatment mortality was lower with tiotropium bromide than with placebo in the UPLIFT® trial. Pooled analyses showed significantly lower cardiovascular mortality with tiotropium bromide than with placebo, with a meta-analysis demonstrating no significant difference between patients receiving tiotropium bromide and controls in cardiovascular mortality. Results of modelled pharmacoeconomic analyses conducted from a healthcare payer perspective in several developed countries suggest that tiotropium bromide is a cost-effective option in patients with COPD. In conclusion, tiotropium bromide inhalation powder is a useful option for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD.

Plethysmography and impulse oscillometry assessment of tiotropium and ipratropium bromide; a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in healthy subjects.

AIMS: Spirometry, plethysmography and impulse oscillometry (IOS) measure different aspects of lung function. These methods have not been compared for their ability to assess long- and short-acting anticholinergic agents. We therefore performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way cross-over study in 30 healthy subjects. METHODS: Single doses of tiotropium bromide (Tio) 54 and 18 mcg, ipratropium bromide (IB) 40 mcg and placebo were administered. Specific conductance (sGaw), total lung capacity (TLC), inspiratory capacity (IC) and residual volume (RV) were measured using plethysmography, while IOS measured resistance (R5-25) and reactance (RF and X5). Pulmonary function was measured for 26 h post dose. RESULTS: Tio caused significant improvements in sGaw, forced expiratory voume in 1 s (FEV(1)), maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) and R5-R25 at time points up to 26 h, with no clear differences between doses. IB improved the same parameters, but only up to 8 h. The weighted mean change (0-24 h) caused by Tio 54 mcg compared with placebo for FEV(1) was 240 ml (95% confidence interval 180, 300), while for sGaw the ratio of geometric means (Tio compared with placebo) was 1.35 (1.28, 1.41). Neither drug caused consistent statistically significant changes in RF, forced vital capacity, TLC or IC over 26 h. RV was significantly improved from 8 to 24 h by Tio 54 mcg only. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to spirometry, IOS resistance measurements and sGaw can distinguish between the effects of long- and shortacting anticholinergic effects in healthy subjects.

Tiotropium: a bronchodilator for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of tiotropium bromide, a new bronchodilator indicated for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DATA SOURCES: Articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-January 2005) using the key words tiotropium, BA 679 BR, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anticholinergic agents. Additional citations were identified from bibliographies of publications cited. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Experimental and observational studies of tiotropium bromide were selected. Trials of the efficacy of the drug in humans were the focus of the review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Tiotropium bromide is an effective bronchodilator for patients with COPD. It produces clinically important improvements in lung function, symptoms of dyspnea, quality of life, and exacerbation rates compared with placebo. In comparative studies, tiotropium does not appear to be more efficacious than salmeterol or ipratropium. CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium is an effective inhaled anticholinergic agent that is recommended among preferred long-acting bronchodilators for the chronic management of moderate to very severe COPD. Although similar to ipratropium in efficacy and tolerability, it has the advantage of once-daily dosing.

Tiotropium: an inhaled anticholinergic for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, dosage and administration, and formulary considerations of tiotropium are discussed. SUMMARY: Tiotropium, a long-acting inhaled anticholinergic, recently received approval from the Food and Drug Administration for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In patients with COPD, increased parasympathetic nervous system activity leads to bronchoconstriction and mucus secretion. Tiotropium induces relaxation of the airway smooth muscle, as does ipratropium, but differs in receptor association and dissociation rates, allowing for once-daily administration. After inhalation, tiotropium reaches maximal plasma concentrations within five minutes, but clinical improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) are maintained over 24 hours. Clinical trials of tiotropium with placebo, ipratropium, and salmeterol have demonstrated the efficacy of tiotropium in improving FEV(1) and forced vital capacity values and health-related quality of life. The most commonly observed adverse effect is dry mouth. No increase in adverse effects was observed when tiotropium was administered concomitantly with other drugs for COPD, including sympathomimetic bronchodilators and oral and inhaled corticosteroids. The combination of tiotropium and other anticholinergics has not been studied and is not recommended. The recommended dosage of tiotropium is the inhalation of an 18-mug capsule with a HandiHaler breath-actuated inhalation device once daily. CONCLUSION: Tiotropium appears to be at least as effective as currently available alternatives in the treatment of patients with COPD who require daily bronchodilator treatment. Its simplified dosing and tolerable adverse-effect profile can potentially lead to enhanced patient compliance.

Assessment of potential selectivity of antispasmodics for the various sections of the gastrointestinal tract of the rat as a guideline for their clinical use.

Two spasmolytic drugs, N-butylscopolammonium bromide and octylonium bromide have been challenged against topical carbachol-induced contracture of gastric antrum, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum, colon and rectum of the rat. Experimental data indicate that N-butylscopolammonium bromide, a competitive anticholinergic agent, is more effective on the upper than on the lower sections of the rat gastrointestinal tract. On the other hand octylonium bromide, which has been reported to have little if any competitive antimuscarinic properties at effective spasmolytic doses, showed a more composite spectrum of activity. Hexamethonium, a nicotinic cholinoceptor antagonist, was about equally effective in inhibiting carbachol-induced contractions of all the GIT sections under study. Data in the literature and our own findings do not support the use of competitive antimuscarinic drugs for the treatment of colonic hypermotility. In fact, at effective spasmolytic doses they are expected to produce a greater inhibition of motility of the upper sections of the GIT than at the colonic level.