RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis involving the hands is a common occupational skin disease for hairdressers and the potent sensitizers p -phenylenediamine (PPD) and toluene-2,5-diamine (PTD) are associated with the development of occupational allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze whether the use of the moderate sensitizer 2-methoxymethyl-PPD (ME-PPD) in professional hair dyes is a suitable tool to reduce the occupational contact allergy risk for hairdressers. METHODS: Hand exposure of hairdressers (N = 11) to ME-PPD was analyzed under routine hair coloring conditions in commercial salons. By accounting for wet work and uneven hand exposure, the daily hand exposure was derived and compared with the occupational acceptable exposure level (AEL), that is, the sensitization induction threshold of ME-PPD adjusted for interindividual variability among workers. RESULTS: The daily hand exposure to ME-PPD was 1.6 µg/cm 2 , and the occupational AEL was 215 µg/cm 2 . The ratio of hand exposure to AEL was calculated as the margin of safety (MOS) against occupational sensitization. For ME-PPD, the MOS of 134 indicates a low likelihood of sensitization versus PPD and PTD with MOS values of 2.7 and 5.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data predict that the use of ME-PPD in professional hair color products improves the protection of hairdressers against hair dye-related contact allergy versus the use of PPD and PTD.
Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Tinturas para Cabelo , Exposição Ocupacional , Fenilenodiaminas , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Tinturas para Cabelo/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Fenilenodiaminas/efeitos adversos , Medição de RiscoAssuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Tiazóis/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro , Prevalência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) is the most commonly recognized occupational disease in Denmark. OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of recognized OCD on degree of employment, sick leave, unemployment, and job change. METHODS: Data on all recognized individuals with OCD notified in Denmark between 2010 and 2015 (n = 8940) were linked to information on social transfer payments in the years before and after notification. The number of weeks on unemployment benefits or sick leave and the degree of employment during the 2 years prior to notification was compared with the 2 years following notification. RESULTS: The degree of employment decreased on average 8.9 work-hours/month, corresponding to an average annual loss of income per worker of approximately 1570. The average number of weeks that workers were receiving unemployment benefits and paid long-term sick leave rose by 2.5 and 3.4 weeks, respectively, corresponding to an average additional annual cost per worker of approximately 420 and 770, respectively. Longer case-processing time was significantly associated with lower degree of employment and higher levels of unemployment and sick leave. CONCLUSIONS: OCD has a significant negative impact on employment and economics, thus highlighting the need for a national, strategic action plan for effective prevention of OCD.
Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/economia , Dermatite Ocupacional/economia , Emprego/economia , Licença Médica/economia , Adulto , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , DesempregoAssuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Eczema/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Eczema/prevenção & controle , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Humanos , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The use of cytostatic drugs such as Mitomycin C and 5-Fluorouracil is well-known in glaucoma filtering surgery, as well as the management of its complications. However, there is a lack of information regarding the preventive measures to be taken by the professional that handles these types of substances. OBJECTIVE: Raise awareness among professionals of the risks associated with the use of cytostatic drugs without adequate prevention measures. RESULTS: Review of the available literature and legislation on preventive measures in the management of cytostatic drugs in the medical and ophthalmological field. CONCLUSIONS: The prevention and awareness of the risks of the qualified professionals that handle these substances is the most important measure to prevent the possible risks. Coordination is necessary with the Occupational Health teams of the Hospital, as well as the professionals and staff involved in the different phases of the process, from the preparation in Hospital Pharmacy to its elimination.
Assuntos
Citostáticos/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Filtrante , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Substâncias Perigosas/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Saúde Ocupacional , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Anormalidades Induzidas por Medicamentos/etiologia , Anormalidades Induzidas por Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Acidentes de Trabalho/prevenção & controle , Conjuntivite/induzido quimicamente , Conjuntivite/prevenção & controle , Citostáticos/uso terapêutico , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Toxidermias/etiologia , Toxidermias/prevenção & controle , Embalagem de Medicamentos , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Guias como Assunto , Resíduos Perigosos , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Cefaleia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Gerenciamento de ResíduosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite being largely preventable, many occupational diseases continue to be highly prevalent and extremely costly. Effective strategies are required to reduce their human, economic, and social impacts. METHODS: To better understand which approaches are most likely to lead to progress in preventing noise-related hearing loss, occupational contact dermatitis, occupational cancers, and occupational asthma, we undertook a scoping review and consulted with a number of key informants. RESULTS: We examined a total of 404 articles and found that various types of interventions are reported to contribute to occupational disease prevention but each has its limitations and each is often insufficient on its own. Our principal findings included: legislation and regulations can be an effective means of primary prevention, but their impact depends on both the nature of the regulations and the degree of enforcement; measures across the hierarchy of controls can reduce the risk of some of these diseases and reduce exposures; monitoring, surveillance, and screening are effective prevention tools and for evaluating the impact of legislative/policy change; the effect of education and training is context-dependent and influenced by the manner of delivery; and, multifaceted interventions are often more effective than ones consisting of a single activity. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review identifies occupational disease prevention strategies worthy of further exploration by decisionmakers and stakeholders and of future systematic evaluation by researchers. It also identified important gaps, including a lack of studies of precarious workers and the need for more studies that rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.
Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ocupacional , Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Asma Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias/etiologia , Ruído Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Occupational skin diseases (OSDs) are the most common work-related diseases in Germany and responsible for a large individual and financial burden. Therefore, a tertiary individual prevention program (TIP) is offered to patients with severe OSD who are at increased risk of abandoning their profession. OBJECTIVES: To define cost of illness (COI) of OSD in Germany and to economically evaluate the TIP from a societal perspective. METHODS: In this study, data on patients taking part in the TIP (September 2005 to December 2009) were collected. Sociodemographic and medical data, costs, disease severity (Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index), and quality of life (QoL; Dermatology Life Quality Index) were assessed. COI and cost-effectiveness analyses were performed with a simulated control group. RESULTS: In the analysis, 1041 patients were included. Intervention costs per person were 15 009 with decreasing COI over time. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio revealed expenses per patient of 8942 for a reduction in severity level and 9093 for an improvement in QoL in the base case. Considering costs for retraining, the break-even point is reached if the TIP prevents retraining in approximately 64% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: The decreased COI in this long-term evaluation indicates that the TIP is cost-effective in patients with severe OSD.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dermatite Ocupacional/economia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Terciária/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/terapia , Serviços de Diagnóstico/economia , Custos Diretos de Serviços , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Licença Médica/economia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Occupational hand dermatitis poses a serious risk for nurses. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention in reducing the prevalence of hand dermatitis in nurses METHODS: This was a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted at 35 hospital trusts, health boards or universities in the UK. Participants were (i) first-year student nurses with a history of atopic conditions or (ii) intensive care unit (ICU) nurses. Participants at intervention sites received access to a behavioural change programme plus moisturizing creams. Participants at control sites received usual care. The primary outcome was the change of prevalent dermatitis at follow-up (adjusted for baseline dermatitis) in the intervention vs. the control group. Randomization was blinded to everyone bar the trials unit to ensure allocation concealment. The trial was registered on the ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN53303171. RESULTS: Fourteen sites were allocated to the intervention arm and 21 to the control arm. In total 2040 (69·5%) nurses consented to participate and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The baseline questionnaire was completed by 1727 (84·7%) participants. Overall, 789 (91·6%) ICU nurses and 938 (84·0%) student nurses returned completed questionnaires. Of these, 994 (57·6%) had photographs taken at baseline and follow-up (12-15 months). When adjusted for baseline prevalence of dermatitis and follow-up interval, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for hand dermatitis at follow-up in the intervention group relative to the controls were 0·72 (0·33-1·55) and 0·62 (0·35-1·10) for student and ICU nurses, respectively. No harms were reported. CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to conclude whether our intervention was effective in reducing hand dermatitis in our populations. Linked Comment: Brans. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:411-412.
Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional , Eczema , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Mãos , Humanos , Medicina Estatal , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Opioid-manufacturing facility workers are at risk of developing occupational contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To describe the causes of occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by opioids in an opioid-manufacturing facility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients assessed at the Occupational Dermatology Clinic in Melbourne, Australia from 2004 to 2017. RESULTS: Fifteen workers from an opioid-manufacturing facility were assessed in our clinic over a period of 14 years. Of these, 11 individuals were diagnosed with occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by opioids, with seven reacting to thebaine, five to morphine, four to norhydroxymorphinone, two to codeine, and two to oripavine. Two people were suspected of having immediate hypersensitivity reactions to opioids, including one who also had allergic contact dermatitis. Two patients were diagnosed with urticaria, aggravated at work. One patient was diagnosed with a non-occupational rash. CONCLUSIONS: We report a case series of workers with allergic contact dermatitis caused by opioids in a manufacturing facility. With greater awareness, including implementation of an educational programme and improved skin protection, the number of cases declined over time. Interestingly, norhydroxymorphinone had not been reported as an allergen before. Further testing is required to establish optimal patch test concentrations of all opiates.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Indústria Farmacêutica , Adulto , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Ocupacional , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vitória/epidemiologiaRESUMO
This review forms part of a series of annual updates that summarize the evidence base for atopic eczema (AE). It presents the key findings from 11 systematic reviews published in 2016 that focus on AE outcome assessment, disease impact and nomenclature. Systematic reviews on the treatment and prevention of AE are summarized in Part 1 of this update, and systematic reviews on the epidemiology of and risk factors for AE are summarized in Part 2. Six reviews summarized what outcome measurement instruments have been used in published AE trials, or summarized validation studies for the available instruments. These reviews were used to inform consensus decisions by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative. Although validated instruments exist for clinical signs and patient-reported symptoms, there are currently no validated instruments for capturing quality of life or long-term control. Four reviews examined the impact of AE on children and their families, but few studies were included. One birth cohort study found no association between AE and educational attainment at 11 years. AE has a moderate impact on health-related quality of life and a substantial impact on family life. AE is a major risk factor for occupational hand dermatitis, and it is advised that young atopic individuals are informed about high-risk occupations. Further efforts are required to standardize the nomenclature for AE, which is also commonly known as 'atopic dermatitis' or 'eczema', and preferred terms vary around the world.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Eczema/diagnóstico , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Dermatite Atópica/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Atópica/psicologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sickness absence in hand eczema patients has been associated with stress rather than disease severity, indicating that personal aspects regarding hand eczema should be investigated further. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether patient education vs treatment as usual can influence behaviour and knowledge regarding skin protection and care, as well as personal resources, in patients with occupational hand eczema. METHODS: PREVEX is an individually randomized clinical trial investigating the 1-year effects of a simple, low-cost group-counselling programme vs treatment as usual for patients with notified occupational hand eczema. Exploratory outcomes were behaviour, knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-evaluated skin care ability. RESULTS: In total, 1668 patients with notified occupational skin disease were invited to participate, of whom 769 were randomized and 756 were analysed: intervention group (n = 376) vs control group (n = 380). Behaviour was improved and the knowledge score increased in the intervention group as compared with the control group (respectively: estimate 0.08; 95%CI: 0.02-0.19; P = .01; and estimate 0.49; 95%CI: 0.28-0.70; P < .001). Self-efficacy was lower in the intervention group as compared with the control group (estimate -0.78; 95%CI: -1.25 to -0.30; P = .001). No difference was found regarding skin care abilities. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had a positive influence on 1-year behaviour and knowledge, but was insufficient to result in long-term positive changes in personal resources regarding dealing with hand eczema.
Assuntos
Aconselhamento/métodos , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Eczema/prevenção & controle , Dermatoses da Mão/prevenção & controle , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Adulto , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Licença Médica , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Accelerators in rubber gloves constitute an important group of contact allergens, particularly in healthcare workers. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of accelerator-free medical gloves in the secondary prevention of allergic contact dermatitis caused by rubber accelerators in healthcare workers. METHODS: Nine healthcare workers with hand eczema were advised to use accelerator-free rubber gloves after a diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis caused by rubber accelerators. RESULTS: Switching from conventional medical single-use gloves containing accelerators to accelerator-free medical gloves led to improvement in all cases, and more than two-thirds of the patients were completely free of symptoms. CONCLUSION: The use of accelerator-free medical gloves can be an effective alternative in healthcare workers who are allergic to rubber accelerators.
Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Luvas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Dermatoses da Mão/prevenção & controle , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Borracha/síntese química , Borracha/química , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Tiocarbamatos/efeitos adversos , Tiram/efeitos adversos , Tiram/análogos & derivadosAssuntos
Dermatite de Contato/terapia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/análise , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Aconselhamento , Dermatite de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite de Contato/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/terapia , Luvas Protetoras , Humanos , Anamnese , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Seleção de Pacientes , Prognóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Local de TrabalhoAssuntos
Cromo/toxicidade , Materiais de Construção/toxicidade , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Controlados Antes e Depois , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Exposição Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The article presents results ofhygienic studies on work conditions in using imidacloprid-based pesticides in agriculture. Analysis covered imidacloprid levels in air of workplace, on skin and in urine of workers.
Assuntos
Agricultura , Dermatite Ocupacional , Neonicotinoides , Nitrocompostos , Exposição Ocupacional , Adulto , Agricultura/métodos , Agricultura/normas , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/urina , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neonicotinoides/análise , Neonicotinoides/urina , Nitrocompostos/análise , Nitrocompostos/urina , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ocupacional , Praguicidas/análise , Praguicidas/urina , Gestão de Riscos , Local de Trabalho/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Undergloves are a way to reduce moisture-related skin damage. The aim of this feasibility study was to gain experience with logistics, applicability, acceptability and cost of the routine use of reusable textile undergloves in a hospital setting. METHODS: Undergloves were tested with 18 health-care workers on an intensive care unit over three months. Data on usage as well as logistics were recorded. At baseline, personal data and knowledge and use of cotton undergloves, existing skin problems and the nursing behaviour of the hands by the subjects were determined by means of an input questionnaire. After each wearing, data on usage were collected by a questionnaire. Participants were interviewed by means of a questionnaire with respect to their experience with the use of the undergloves. RESULTS: Acceptance and compliance with the use of undergloves was remarkably good. This was partly due to the properties of the gloves, and partly to the reduction of sweating and very positive effect on the skin of the hands. In the study period 2165 underglove uses were documented, resulting in an average daily consumption of four pairs per person per day. The average wearing time was 28.6 min. The undergloves were suitable for application as well as reprocessing. Reprocessment-related fatigue was relatively low and did not lead to the loss of the properties, only few gloves had to be sorted out. Even if one assumes a complete write-off of the gloves with end of the study, costs for reprocessing were about 0.46 or 64â% less than the single use. CONCLUSION: The routine use of textile, reprocessable undergloves is feasible. Major challenges for broad usage are within logistics and acceptance by the user.
Assuntos
Reutilização de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Luvas Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Têxteis/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Dermatite Ocupacional/economia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Reutilização de Equipamento/economia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Alemanha , Luvas Cirúrgicas/economia , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Têxteis/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers have an increased risk of developing hand eczema. A multifaceted implementation strategy was developed to implement a guideline to prevent hand eczema among healthcare workers. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of the implementation strategy on self-reported hand eczema and preventive behaviour. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed. A total of 48 departments (n = 1649) were randomly allocated to the multifaceted implementation strategy or the control group. The strategy consisted of education, participatory working groups, and role models. Outcome measures were self-reported hand eczema and preventive behaviour. Data were collected at baseline, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Participants in the intervention group were significantly more likely to report hand eczema [odds ratio (OR) 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-2.04], and they reported significantly less hand washing (B, - 0.38; 95%CI: - 0.48 to - 0.27), reported significantly more frequent use of a moisturizer (B, 0.30; 95%CI: 0.22-0.39) and were more likely to report wearing cotton undergloves (OR 6.33; 95%CI: 3.23-12.41) than participants in the control group 12 months after baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy implemented can be used in practice, as it showed positive effects on preventive behaviour. More research is needed to investigate the unexpected effects on hand eczema.
Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Eczema/prevenção & controle , Dermatoses da Mão/prevenção & controle , Educação em Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Luvas Protetoras/estatística & dados numéricos , Desinfecção das Mãos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Casas de Saúde , Saúde Ocupacional , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Autorrelato , Creme para a Pele/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of patient education in occupational skin diseases (OSD) regarding changes of the disease-specific knowledge. METHODS: One hundred and five patients participated in structured patient education as part of an interdisciplinary outpatient prevention measure. In a prospective one-group pre-post-design, the disease-specific knowledge was assessed with the validated "Occupational Skin Diseases Knowledge Questionnaire" (OSD-KQ) before (T0) and after the intervention (T1). A subcohort (n = 68) was examined 2-3 months later (T2). RESULTS: The mean OSD-KQ score significantly improved from 38.5 (59.2% of correct answers, T0) to 55.6 (85.5% of correct answers, T1). A pronounced heterogeneity was observed among the participants regarding the pre-interventional knowledge (10.8-84.6% of correct answers, T0) and the individual knowledge gain. Patients who worked in health-related occupations scored significantly higher. Age and sex did not influence the knowledge. In a subcohort, a significantly improved disease-specific knowledge of 52.3 (80.5% of correct answers) could still be found 2-3 months after the intervention (T2). CONCLUSIONS: Structured patient education significantly improves the disease-specific knowledge in patients with OSD. The study indicates not only positive short- but also sustainable long-term effects on the knowledge gain. The OSD-KQ can serve as a tool to evaluate and improve patient education. Health educators need to be aware of the heterogeneity regarding the participants' knowledge and take this into account during educational practice. Additional counseling may be necessary to meet the individual learners' needs.
Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Adolescente , Adulto , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers and patients are often exposed to natural rubber latex (NRL) through contact with gloves and various healthcare products, which can potentially cause allergic reactions, with varying degrees of severity. In 2008, the Royal College of Physicians published their first evidence-based guidance on occupational health interventions for latex allergy, which emphasized the importance of healthcare workers having knowledge of latex allergy. AIM: This study aimed to survey the knowledge of healthcare workers (n = 156) about latex gloves and NRL allergy, routine prevention practice and the appropriate use of gloves in patient care. METHODS: Healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital were surveyed using a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: We found that only 1% of healthcare workers were able to correctly match the appropriate gloves to the specifically designed procedure. More than half (n = 74.53%) were unable to recognize the presentation of type 1 allergy to NRL. Of the 156 participants, 131 (84%) considered that they would benefit from training about NRL allergy and the use of different types of gloves in clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: This survey indicates the importance of education regarding appropriate use of gloves and prevention of NRL allergy among healthcare workers, and dermatologists should play an important role in facilitating this.
Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Luvas Protetoras/efeitos adversos , Dermatoses da Mão/induzido quimicamente , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Dermatoses da Mão/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Contact dermatitis in the United States poses a significant public health concern. This article provides a definition of contact dermatitis and its associated risk factors. The authors discuss the epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis including its incidence and prevalence, and describe how estimates are calculated in the United States. The burden of disease on the individual, and its economic impact and cost to society, are also elucidated. A review of preventive measures to help reduce contact dermatitis in the workplace and an additional section on patch testing concludes the article.