Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 19(5): 1231-1238, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498557

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For the evaluation results of skin sensitivity, such as clinical parameters, stinging test records and biophysical assessments dates might be impacted by many factors, the influence factors need to be further explored, and the skin sensitivity evaluation process and methodology needed distinction and normalization. In this study, we investigated the changes of sensitive skin indexes and lactic acid stinging test results in different seasons, facial regions, skin photo-type, and living habits. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects had completed this study. Lactic acid stinging test was performed in different seasons. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration, sebum secretion, and pH were measured in an environment-controlled room. Correlations between stinging responses, skin biophysical parameters, and sensitive skin inducements in different seasons were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Skin TEWL, hydration, sebum secretion, and pH values on different facial parts were various. Two-way correlation analysis between the results of lactic acid stinging test in different seasons and the sensitivity factors showed differences between summer, autumn, and winter. The mean scores of lactic acid stinging test increased in autumn. Linear regression analysis of skin sensitivity factors in type III and type IV photobiology skin found that the frequency of sleeping time and eating spicy food in the past of week could infect the sensitive skin evaluation dates statistically (P < .05). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Skin sensitivity assessment results were impacted by seasonal transformation, living habits and customs, and facial regions. These indicted that we should consider above interfering factors when evaluated the skin sensitivity for getting more precise dates.


Assuntos
Dermatite de Contato/diagnóstico , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Pele , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Pele/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Dermatite de Contato/fisiopatologia , Face , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estações do Ano , Sebo/metabolismo , Pele/química , Pele/metabolismo , Perda Insensível de Água , Adulto Jovem
2.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 18(2): 195-202, 2004 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14757110

RESUMO

Allergic contact dermatitis is an important occupational and environmental health disease. There is a need, therefore, to identify skin sensitisation hazard, and to assess accurately likely risks to human health. During the past 15 years very significant advances have been made in our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that serve to initiate and regulate cutaneous immune responses, including the acquisition of skin sensitisation. This has facilitated parallel advances in the identification and characterisation of skin sensitising chemicals and the development of more robust approaches to risk assessment. It is relevant to consider whether advances in immunobiology provide opportunities also for the design of alternative approaches to the toxicological evaluation of skin sensitisation, including the development of in vitro methods. Here we review the potential use of strategies based on analysis of responses induced in Langerhans cells and dendritic cells; professional antigen processing and presenting cells that are known to play pivotal roles during the induction phase of adaptive immune responses.


Assuntos
Células Dendríticas/fisiologia , Dermatite de Contato/fisiopatologia , Pele/fisiopatologia , Animais , Células da Medula Óssea/fisiologia , Dermatite de Contato/epidemiologia , Humanos , Células de Langerhans/fisiologia , Camundongos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA