RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: As invasive cardiovascular care has become increasingly complex, cardiac perforation leading to hemopericardium is a progressively prevalent complication. We sought to assess the frequency, etiology, and outcomes of hemorrhagic pericardial effusions managed through a nonsurgical echo-guided percutaneous strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 10-year period (January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016), 1097 unique patients required pericardiocentesis for clinically important pericardial effusions. Of these 411 had drainage of hemorrhagic effusions (defined as a pericardial hemoglobin level >50% of serum hemoglobin or frank blood in the setting of cardiac perforation). Clinical characteristics, echocardiographic data, details of the procedure, and outcomes were determined. RESULTS: Median patient age was 67 years (interquartile range, 56-76 years), and 60% were men. The procedure was emergent in 83% and elective in 17%. The site of pericardiocentesis was determined by echo-guidance in all: 68% from the left para-apical region, 18% from the left or right parasternal areas, and 14% were subxyphoid. Half (n=215 [52%]) occurred after cardiac perforation with percutaneous interventional procedure (ablation, n=94; device lead implantation, n=65; percutaneous coronary intervention, n=22; other, n=34), whereas 30% followed cardiac or thoracic surgery. Pericardial fluid volume drained was 546±440 mL. In 94% of cases, echo-guided pericardiocentesis was the only treatment of the effusion needed, whereas definitive surgery was required in 25 (6%) cases for persistent bleeding or acute management of the underlying etiology. There was no procedural mortality. Late mortality was better for hemorrhagic effusions compared with a contemporary cohort with nonhemorrhagic effusions. CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic guidance allows rapid successful pericardiocentesis in the setting of hemopericardium related to microperforation with interventional procedures, malignancy, or pericarditis, with most not requiring surgical intervention. Surgery should remain the first-line approach for aortic dissection or myocardial rupture.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia , Derrame Pericárdico/terapia , Pericardiocentese/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemoglobinas/análise , Humanos , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Derrame Pericárdico/diagnóstico por imagem , Derrame Pericárdico/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Major procedural complications related to left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are relatively infrequent but may be associated with major morbidity and mortality. LAAO operators should be knowledgeable about these potential complications. Prompt recognition and treatment are necessary to avoid rapid deterioration and dire consequences. With stringent guidelines on operator training, competency requirements, and procedural-technical refinements, LAAO can be performed safely with low complication rates. This article focuses on commonly used devices, as well as prevention, treatment, and management of complications of LAOO.
Assuntos
Apêndice Atrial/cirurgia , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Dispositivo para Oclusão Septal/efeitos adversos , Apêndice Atrial/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Tamponamento Cardíaco/epidemiologia , Tamponamento Cardíaco/mortalidade , Tamponamento Cardíaco/prevenção & controle , Tamponamento Cardíaco/terapia , Comorbidade , Humanos , Incidência , Derrame Pericárdico/epidemiologia , Derrame Pericárdico/mortalidade , Derrame Pericárdico/prevenção & controle , Derrame Pericárdico/terapia , Período Perioperatório , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Preceptoria/normas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Trombose/epidemiologia , Trombose/mortalidade , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Trombose/terapia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate current echocardiographically (echo)-guided pericardiocentesis practice with regard to procedural success, complication rate, etiological causes, and outcomes of patients with clinically significant pericardial effusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent echo-guided pericardiocentesis between January 2004 and February 2014 were identified using an institutional code for the procedure. Other complementary data were obtained by interviewing patients or their relatives (directly or by telephone) and by searching the social security death index. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients were identified. The pericardium was approached via the subcostal (85 %) or apical (15 %) route under echo guidance in all procedures. The success rate was 97 %, with an intervention-requiring complication rate of 1.3 %. No patient died from complications. The most common etiology was malignancy (n = 84, 28 %). Patients were followed-up for a median of 35 months. Median survival for patients with malignant effusion was 5.9 months compared with 54 months for those with nonmalignant effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Echo-guided pericardiocentesis has a high success and low complication rate in current practice. Among etiologies, malignancy remains the most common cause of clinically significant pericardial effusion and is associated with a poor prognosis.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Derrame Pericárdico/mortalidade , Derrame Pericárdico/terapia , Pericardiocentese/mortalidade , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Derrame Pericárdico/diagnóstico por imagem , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: the study aimed to evaluate the prognostic importance of an incidental small pericardial effusion found on echocardiography. METHODS: we identified 10,067 consecutive patients undergoing echocardiography at 1 of 3 laboratories. Patients were excluded if they were referred for evaluation of the pericardium (n = 133), had cardiac surgery within the previous 60 days (n = 393), had a moderate or greater pericardial effusion (>1 cm if circumferential, n = 29), had no follow-up (n = 153), or had inadequate visualization of the pericardial space (n = 9). The Social Security Death Index was used to determine survival. RESULTS: a small pericardial effusion was noted in 534 (5.7%) of 9,350 patients. Compared to patients without a small effusion, those with an effusion were slightly older (68 ± 13 vs 67 ± 12 years, P = .02) and had a lower ejection fraction (52% vs 55%, P < .0001). Mortality at 1 year was greater for patients with a small effusion (26%) compared to those without an effusion (11%, P < .0001). After adjustment for demographics, medical history, patient location, and other echocardiographic findings, small pericardial effusion remained associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.28, P = .0002). Of 211 with an effusion and follow-up echocardiography (mean 547 days), 136 (60%) had resolution, 63 (28%) showed no change, and 12 (5%) had an increase in size, although no patient developed a large effusion or cardiac tamponade. CONCLUSION: the presence of a small asymptomatic pericardial effusion is associated with increased mortality.