Assessing accuracy of measurement methods for bony fusion assessment after anterior cervical discectomy.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Currently, there is no universally accepted method for assessing radiological fusion shortly after anterior cervical discectomy. Five-year follow-up radiological X-rays demonstrating solid fusion or absence of fusion provided a gold standard for comparison with various assessment methods. PURPOSE: Establishing the most accurate diagnostic test for earlier bony fusion assessment by comparing different cut-off values for the difference in interspinous distance and the change in Cobb angle on dynamic radiological images against the established gold standard. DESIGN: Posthoc analysis from the NEtherlands Cervical Kinematics (NECK) trial (NTR1289). PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 40 patients with 1 level herniated disc that underwent anterior discectomy between 2010 and 2014 returned for a 5-year follow-up X-ray. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiological outcome was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively by fusion on radiographic images 5 years after surgery. METHODS: Radiological dynamic X-rays were reviewed for fusion at 5-year follow-up by a senior spine surgeon. At this timepoint, bony continuity was indisputable and served as gold standard. Cobb angles and interspinous distances on flexion-extension images were measured independently by 2 investigators. Optimum agreement between the gold standard and the 2 methods was assessed, evaluating varying cut-off values, considering sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Dynamic radiographic assessments revealed fusion in 29 out of 40 patients (mean age: 49 years ± 8; 23 women). For Cobb angle (optimal cut-off: ≤3.0°), the AUC was 0.86 with 100% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity. For interspinous distance (optimal cut-off: ≤1.5 mm), the AUC was 0.89 with 96.6% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity. The highest AUC (0.91) was observed for combined cut-off values (Cobb angle ≤3.0° and interspinous distance ≤2.0 mm), yielding 100% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity. CONCLUSION: The combination of cut-off values ≤3.0° difference for Cobb angle and ≤2.0 mm difference for interspinous distance on lateral flexion-extension X-rays was assessed to be an accurate diagnostic criterion for fusion evaluation. This tool provides a practical and easy applicable method for assessing fusion during follow-up after anterior discectomy.

Cauda Equina Syndrome: Cost Burden After Spinal Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare neurologic condition with potentially devastating consequences. The objective of this study was to compare the 2-year postoperative cost-associated treatments after posterior spinal decompression between patients with and without CES. METHODS: By analyzing a commercial insurance claims database, patients who underwent posterior spinal decompression with a concurrent diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis, radiculopathy, or disk herniation in 2017 were identified and included in the study. The primary outcome was the cost of payments for identified treatments in the 2-year period after surgery. Treatments included were (1) physical therapy (PT), (2) pain medication, (3) injections, (4) bladder management, (5) bowel management, (6) sexual dysfunction treatment, and (7) psychological treatment. RESULTS: In total, 3,140 patients (age, 55.3 ± 12.0 years; male, 62.2%) were included in the study. The average total cost of treatments identified was $2,996 ± 6,368 per patient. The overall cost of identified procedures was $2,969 ± 6,356 in non-CES patients, compared with $4,535 ± 6,898 in patients with CES ( P = 0.079). Among identified treatments, only PT and bladder management costs were significantly higher for patients with CES (PT: +115%, P < 0.001; bladder management: +697%, P < 0.001). The difference in overall cost was significant between patients (non-CES: $1,824 ± 3,667; CES: $3,022 ± 4,679; P = 0.020) in the first year. No difference was found in the second year. DISCUSSION: A short-term difference was observed in costs occurring in the first postoperative year. Cost of treatments was similar between patients apart from PT and bladder management.

Economic Implications of Dural Tears in Lumbar Microdiscectomies: A Retrospective, Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Dural tears (DTs) are a frequent complication after lumbar spine surgery. We sought to determine the incidence of DTs and the related impact on health care expenditures after lumbar discectomies. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients with first-time single-level lumbar discectomies at our institution who underwent minimally invasive surgery from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed. Age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, costs, revenues, length of stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and operative time (OT) were assessed. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, previous spine surgery, multiple or traumatic disc herniations, and malignant and infectious diseases. RESULTS: The follow-up time was at least 12 months postoperatively. Of 358 patients identified with lumbar discectomies, 230 met the inclusion criteria. Incidence of DTs was 3.5%. Mean costs (P < 0.001), economic loss (P < 0.01), and OT (P < 0.0001) were found to be significantly higher in the DT group compared with the control group of patients without a DT. The revenues were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Further analysis of the control group by profit and loss revealed significantly higher body mass index (P < 0.05), length of stay (P < 0.0001), and OT (P < 0.0001) in the loss group. CONCLUSIONS: DTs represent a significant socioeconomic burden in lumbar spine surgery and cause severe secondary complications. The impact of DTs on health care expenses is primarily based on significantly higher OT and a higher mean length of stay.

Impact of evidence-based guidelines on healthcare utilisation and costs for disc related sciatica in the Netherlands: a population-based, cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of high-quality evidence supporting surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) on healthcare practice in the Netherlands by examining changes in healthcare utilisation, including the timing of surgery, and the healthcare costs for patients with LDH. DESIGN: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed using population-based, longitudinal data obtained from the Dutch Healthcare Authority (2007-2020) and NIVEL's primary care (2012-2020) administrative databases. SETTING: The study was conducted within the healthcare system of the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: We included adults (≥18 years) who visited a Dutch hospital or a general practitioner (GP) for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Patients with LDH were identified based on registered diagnosis code, type of surgery (discectomy) and age (<56 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the difference in the annual number of LDH procedures following the publication of evidence-based guidelines in 2009 (comparing the periods 2007-2009 to 2017-2019). Secondary outcome measures focused on the timing of surgery and associated healthcare costs. To validate the outcomes, secondary outcomes also include the number of discectomies and the number of procedures in the younger age group (discectomies, laminectomies, and fusion surgery). RESULTS: The number of patients suffering from LDH increased from 55 581 to 68 997 (+24%) between 2007 and 2019. A decrease was observed in the annual number of LDH procedures (-18%), in the number of discectomies (-22%) and in the number of procedures for patients aged <56 years (-18%). This resulted in lower healthcare costs by €10.5 million annually. In 2012, 31% of all patients <56 years had surgery before 12 weeks from diagnosis at the GP, whereas 20% did in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare utilisation for LDH changed tremendously in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2020 and seemed to be associated with the publication and implementation of evidence-based guidelines. The observed decrease in the number of procedures has been accompanied by a corresponding reduction in healthcare costs. These findings underscore the importance of adhering to evidence-based guidelines to optimise the management of patients with LDH.

Chronic cauda equina syndrome decompression surgery recovery is very "bad"? Based on patient self-assessment.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of cauda equina syndrome (CES) secondary to degenerative lumbar spine diseases are sometimes mild and tend to be ignored by patients, resulting in delayed treatment. In addition, the long-term efficacy of surgery is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive factors of CES and post-operative recovery in patients with symptoms lasting > 3 months. METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2020, data of 45 patients with CES secondary to lumbar disk herniation/lumbar spinal stenosis were collected from a single center. The patients had bladder, bowel or sexual dysfunction and decreased perineal sensation that lasted for > 3 months. A 2-year post-operative follow-up was conducted to evaluate recovery outcomes, which were measured by validated self-assessment questionnaires conducted by telephone and online. RESULTS: Overall, 45 CES patients (57.8% female; mean age, 56 years) were included. The duration of pre-operative CES symptoms was 79.6 weeks (range, 13-730 weeks). The incidence of saddle anesthesia before decompression was 71.1% (n = 32), bladder dysfunction 84.4% (n = 38), bowel dysfunction 62.2% (n = 28) and sexual dysfunction 64.4% (n = 29). The overall recovery rate of CES after a 2-year follow-up was 64.4%. The rates of the residual symptoms at the last follow-up were as follows: saddle anesthesia 22.2%, bladder dysfunction 33.3%, bowel dysfunction 24.4% and sexual dysfunction 48.9%. Pre-operative saddle anesthesia, overactive bladder and sexual dysfunction were risk factors for poor prognosis after decompression. CONCLUSION: CES patients with symptoms lasting > 3 months may recover after surgery. Sexual dysfunction has a high residual rate and should not be ignored during diagnosis and treatment.

Assessment of efficacy of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty for lumbar stenosis and failed back surgery syndrome: effective and safe?

OBJECTIVE: Chronic, refractory low back and lower extremity pain is a common problem. There are many causes for persistent low back pain, including spinal stenosis (SS), disc herniation, facet disease, sacroiliac disease, adjacent segment disease, ligamentous disease, and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). FBSS and SS are common and often result in chronic, persistent pain and disability. After the failure of conservative treatments, percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) is often used in managing low back pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 117 patients who received PEN for FBSS and SS between January 2018 and January 2019. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). The follow-up period was 6 months. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty in managing chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain secondary to FBSS and SS and to compare the differences between outcomes of SS and FBSS groups, before and after PEN. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores were 6.15 ± 1.25 preoperatively, 2.97 ± 1.5 after 1 month, 3.18 ± 1.65 after 3 months, and 3.83 ± 1.64 after 6 months of follow-up. Mean ODI scores were 49.91 ± 13.87 preoperatively, 30.19 ± 12.01 after 1 month, 31.61 ± 12.46 after 3 months, 34.58 ± 12.52 after 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty was shown to be a safe and effective treatment in managing refractory back/leg pain following FBSS and SS.

Cost and Effectiveness of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy versus Microscope-Assisted Tubular Discectomy for L5-S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost and effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and microscope-assisted tubular discectomy (MATD) for patients with L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: The medical and financial records of patients diagnosed with L5/S1 LDH and who underwent either PEID or MATD from April 2021 to April 2022 were retrospectively collected. Demographic and baseline information, perioperative observational index, clinical outcomes, and inpatient costs were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included, with 30 patients in the PEID group and 30 patients in the MATD group. No significant difference was found in demographic and baseline information between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The PEID group showed significantly shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and higher intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency compared with the MATD group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in visual analog scale back/leg score, Oswestry Disability Index, and 36-Item Short-Form Survey score between PEID and MATD groups before the surgery and at any follow-up time points (P > 0.05). The total cost, surgery cost, and surgical instruments/materials cost were significantly higher in the PEID group compared with the MATD group (P < 0.05). In contrast, the drug and nursing costs were significantly higher in the MATD group than in the PEID group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PEID and MATD provide equivalent clinical efficacy and safety in treating LDH at L5/S1 segment within a 1-year follow-up. However, PEID is less invasive and MATD is less costly. No one surgical technique is superior in all aspects and patients should make decisions according to their top concern.

Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation With Utilization and Costs of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to analyze the association of Area Deprivation Index (ADI) with the utilization and costs of elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ADI, a comprehensive neighborhood-level measure of socioeconomic disadvantage, has been shown to be associated with worse perioperative outcomes in a variety of surgical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission Database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary elective ACDF between 2013 and 2020 in the state. Patients were stratified into tertiles by ADI, from least disadvantaged (ADI1) to most disadvantaged (ADI3). The primary endpoints were ACDF utilization rates per 100,000 adults and episode-of-care total costs. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 13,362 patients (4984 inpatient and 8378 outpatient) underwent primary ACDF during the study period. In our study, there were 2,401 (17.97%) patients residing in ADI1 neighborhoods (least deprived), 5974 (44.71%) in ADI2, and 4987 (37.32%) in ADI3 (most deprived). Factors associated with increased surgical utilization were increasing ADI, outpatient surgical setting, non-Hispanic ethnicity, current tobacco use, and diagnoses of obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Factors associated with lower surgical utilization were: non-white race, rurality, Medicare/Medicaid insurance status, and diagnoses of cervical disk herniation or myelopathy. Factors associated with higher costs of care were increasing ADI, older age, Black/African American race, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, former tobacco use, and diagnoses of ischemic heart disease and cervical myelopathy. Factors associated with lower costs of care were outpatient surgical setting, female sex, and diagnoses of gastroesophageal reflux disease and cervical disk herniation. CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation is associated with increased episode-of-care costs in patients undergoing ACDF surgery. Interestingly, we found greater utilization of ACDF surgery among patients with higher ADI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Cost-utility analysis of endoscopic lumbar discectomy following a uniform clinical pathway in the Korean national health insurance system.

INTRODUCTION: Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) is a type of minimally invasive spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Sufficient evidence exists to recommend FELD as an alternative to standard open microdiscectomy, and some patients prefer FELD due to its minimally invasive nature. However, in the Republic of Korea, the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) controls the reimbursement and use of supplies for FELD, but FELD is not currently reimbursed by the NHIS. Nonetheless, FELD has been performed upon patients' request, but providing FELD for patients' sake is inherently an unstable arrangement in the absence of a practical reimbursement system. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-utility analysis of FELD to suggest appropriate reimbursements. METHOD: This study was a subgroup analysis of prospectively collected data including 28 patients who underwent FELD. All patients were NHIS beneficiaries and followed a uniform clinical pathway. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were assessed with a utility score using the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) instrument. The costs included direct medical costs incurred at the hospital for 2 years and the price of the electrode ($700), although it was not reimbursed. The costs and QALYs gained were used to calculate the cost per QALY gained. RESULT: Patients' mean age was 43 years and one-third (32%) were women. L4-5 was the most common surgical level (20/28, 71%) and extrusion was the most common type of LDH (14, 50%). Half of the patients (15, 54%) had jobs with an intermediate level of activity. The preoperative EQ-5D utility score was 0.48±0.19. Pain, disability, and the utility score significantly improved starting 1 month postoperatively. The average EQ-5D utility score during 2 years after FELD was estimated as 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85). For 2 years, the mean direct costs were $3,459 and the cost per QALY gained was $5,241. CONCLUSION: The cost-utility analysis showed a quite reasonable cost per QALY gained for FELD. A comprehensive range of surgical options should be provided to patients, for which a practical reimbursement system is a prerequisite.

Angulation error assessment for the trajectory in the anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic views during percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy.

BACKGROUND: Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopies are often used to evaluate the intraoperative location and angulation of the trajectory in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD). Although the location of the trajectory shown in fluoroscopy is absolutely accurate, the angulation is not always reliable. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the angle shown in the AP and lateral fluoroscopic views. METHODS: A technical study was performed to assess the angulation errors of PETLD trajectories shown in AP and lateral fluoroscopic views. After reconstructing a lumbar CT image, a virtual trajectory was placed into the intervertebral foramen with gradient-changing coronal angulations of the cephalad angle plane (CACAP). For each angulation, virtual AP and lateral fluoroscopies were taken, and the cephalad angles (CA) of the trajectory shown in the AP and lateral fluoroscopic views, which indicated the coronal CA and the sagittal CA, respectively, were measured. The angular relationships among the real CA, CACAP, coronal CA, and sagittal CA were further demonstrated with formulae. RESULTS: In PETLD, the coronal CA is approximately equal to the real CA, with a small angle difference and percentage error, whereas the sagittal CA shows a rather large angle difference and percentage error. CONCLUSION: The AP view is more reliable than the lateral view in determining the CA of the PETLD trajectory.

Economic comparisons of endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Full-endoscopic techniques are minimally invasive surgery alternatives to traditional spinal surgery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the costs of these techniques compared to traditional approaches. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed for economic evaluations that compare endoscopic decompressions of the lumbar spine for stenosis or disc herniation to open or microsurgical decompressions. The search was performed in the following databases: Medline, Embase Classic, Embase, and Central Cochrane library, from January 1, 2005, to October 22, 2022. The included studies were each evaluated according to a formal assessment checklist to evaluate the quality of economic evaluations based on 35 criteria. RESULT: A total of 1153 studies were identified, with 9 articles included in the final analysis. In evaluating the quality of economic evaluations, the study with the fewest met criteria scored 9/35 and the study with the most met criteria scored 28/35. Only 3 studies completed cost-effectiveness analyses. Surgical procedure duration varied between studies, but hospital length of stays were consistently shorter with endoscopy. While endoscopy was more frequently associated with higher operating costs, studies that measured healthcare and societal costs found endoscopy to be advantageous. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic spine surgery was found to be cost-effective in treating patients with lumbar stenosis and disc herniation when compared to standard microscopic approaches from a societal perspective. More well-designed economic evaluations investigating the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic spine procedures are needed to further support these findings.

Assessment of quality of life, pain level and disability outcomes after lumbar discectomy.

This study aimed to assess the quality of life of 113 Caucasian patients with intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration of the lumbosacral (L/S) spine who qualified for microdiscectomy during a 12-month period after surgery. Based on magnetic resonance imaging before the surgery, the degree of radiological advancement of the degenerative changes was determined according to the Pfirrmann grading scale from 1 to 5. To assess pain intensity, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used; the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) was used to evaluate quality of life; and to assess the degree of ability, the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI) was employed. The level of pain, assessed using the VAS, significantly changed in the months following the surgery, with the highest values noted before surgery and the lowest a year after. In turn, the results of the SWLS questionnaire revealed a significant increase in satisfaction with life in the subsequent stages of the study. The conducted correlation analysis revealed significant dependencies in terms of quality of life in regard to pain as well as degree of disability. The level of pain and degree of disability were closely related to the degree of radiological advancement of degenerative changes according to the Pfirrmann grading scale.

Does Symptom Duration Prior to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Disc Herniation Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Workers' Compensation Population?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of symptom duration before anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in workers' compensation patients. METHODS: A prospective registry was searched for workers' compensation patients who underwent ACDF for herniated disc. Two cohorts based on symptom duration were formed: lesser duration (LD) (<6 months) and prolonged duration (PD) (≥6 months). PROs were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. PROs were compared within and between groups. Rates of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) were compared between groups. RESULTS: The study included 63 patients. The LD cohort reported improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) neck at 12 weeks and 6 months and VAS arm at all periods (all P ≤ 0.036). The LD cohort reported improvement in NDI at 12 weeks and 6 months and VAS arm at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months (all P ≤ 0.037). Between groups, the LD cohort demonstrated superior scores in PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months; NDI preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months; VAS neck at 12 weeks; and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at 6 months (all P ≤ 0.045). The LD group was more likely to achieve MCID in PROMIS-PF at 12 weeks (P = 0.012). The PD group was more likely to achieve MCID in PHQ-9 at 6 months (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of length of symptom duration before ACDF in workers' compensation patients, the patients demonstrated improvements in disability and arm pain. Patients with LD also demonstrated improvements in physical function and neck pain. Patients with LD demonstrated superior scores in physical function, pain, disability, and mental health and were more likely to achieve clinically significant improvement in physical function. Patients with PD were more likely to achieve clinically significant improvement in mental health.

Epidemiology of the causes of complaints after discectomy collected from a French insurance company.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar discectomy is a frequent procedure performed by surgeons from specialties at risk of patient complaints. The objective of the study was to analyze the causes of litigations following lumbar discectomy to be able to reduce their frequency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This observational, retrospective study was carried out at a French insurance company (Branchet). All files opened between the 1st of January 2003 and the 31st of December 2020, following lumbar discectomy without instrumentation and without any other associated code, undertaken by a surgeon insured by Branchet, were analyzed. The data was extracted from the database by a consultant from the insurance company and analyzed by an orthopedic surgeon. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four records met all inclusion criteria and were complete and available for analysis. Infection was the leading cause of litigation, responsible for 27% of complaints. Residual postoperative pain was the second cause of complaint with 26% of cases, of which 93% had persistent pain. Neurological deficits were the third cause of complaint with 25% of cases among which 76% were related to the appearance of a deficit and 20% related to the persistence of an existing deficit. Early recurrence of herniated disc also appeared as a cause of complaint, accounting for 7% of cases. CONCLUSION: Surgical site infection, persistence of pain, and the appearance or persistence of neurological disorders are the primary causes of complaints leading to investigation in the aftermath of lumbar discectomy. It seems essential to us that this information be brought to the attention of surgeons to enable them to better adapt their explanations in the delivery of preoperative information. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of intradiscal condoliase injection vs. surgical or conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation.

AIMS: This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of intradiscal condoliase injection compared to surgical or conservative treatment for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who are refractory to conservative treatment. METHODS: We performed the following cost-effectiveness analyses: (I) condoliase followed by open surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) vs. open surgery from the beginning, (II) condoliase followed by endoscopic surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) vs. endoscopic surgery from the beginning, and (III) condoliase + conservative treatment vs. conservative treatment. In the first two comparisons with surgical treatments, we assumed that utilities were equal in both groups and estimated the tangible (treatment, adverse events, postoperative follow-up) and intangible (mental and physical burden, and productivity loss) costs based on the existing literature, the medical expense scoring table, and online questionnaire. In the last comparison without surgical treatment, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The average cost per patient of condoliase followed by open surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) was 701,643 yen, with a reduction of 663,369 in comparison to that of open surgery from the beginning (1,365,012 yen). The average cost per patient of condoliase followed by endoscopic surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) was 643,909 yen, with a reduction of 514,909 in comparison to that of endoscopic surgery from the beginning (1,158,817 yen). ICER was 1.58 million yen/QALY (ΔQALY = 0.119, 95% confidence interval: 0.059-0.180; Δcost = 188,809 yen at 2 years post-treatment). CONCLUSIONS: Condoliase as a first line treatment option ahead of surgical treatment for LDH is superior, from a cost perspective, to surgical treatment from the beginning. Condoliase is also a cost-effective alternative to non-surgery conservative treatment.

Long-term outcome of redo discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniations.

PURPOSE: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) is an important cause of morbidity and healthcare costs. The goal of this investigation is to assess surgical outcomes and their predictors in patients who underwent revision discectomy for RLDH, with a minimum follow-up of ten years, to shed light on the best treatment to offer to these patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision discectomy to treat RLDH between 2004 and 2011 in our Department were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected. The need of third intervention for RLDH was the primary outcome. Patient's satisfaction, Core Outcome Measures Index, Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQoL-5D scores were also evaluated. RESULTS: This study includes 55 patients, with a mean follow-up time of 144 months [112-199]. In this period, a third intervention was needed in 30.9% (n = 17) of patients. Most recurrences took place in the first 2 years after the second surgery (58.8%, n = 10) and the risk of needing a third surgery decreased over time. After 5 years, the probability of not having surgery for recurrence was 71% [CI 95%: 60-84%], with a tendency to stabilize after that. An interval between the first discectomy and the surgery for recurrence shorter than 7.6 months was identified as a predictor for a second recurrence. CONCLUSION: The risk of needing a third surgery seems to stabilize after five years. Patients with an early recurrence after the first discectomy seem to have a higher risk of a new recurrence, so an arthrodesis might be worth considering.

A Simple New Cost-Effective Retractor System for Exposure in Lumbar Microdiscectomy: 1-Year Outcome Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new technique for retraction in lumbar microdiscectomy, the rubber band technique (RT), and compare 1-year clinical outcomes of the technique with standard microdiscectomy (SM). METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 81 consecutive patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation underwent lumbar microdiscectomy by either RT or SM. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index score 1 year after surgery. Secondary outcomes included Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning subscale score, SF-36 bodily pain subscale score, and visual analog scale back pain and leg pain scores. Other parameters were operative time, hospital stay, skin incision, complications, and redo surgery. RESULTS: Of 81 patients, 93% (76 patients) had complete data up to 1-year follow up. The RT group comprised 39 patients (20 males, 19 females), and the SM group comprised 37 patients (19 males 18 females). Primary and secondary outcomes Oswestry Disability Index score, SF-36 physical functioning score, SF-36 bodily pain score, VAS back and leg pain scores, complications, and redo surgery did not differ significantly between the treatment groups at follow-up points (P > 0.05). Skin incision was smaller in the RT group compared with the SM group (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Over the 1-year follow-up period, clinical outcomes of patients treated with RT were comparable to patients treated with SM. RT appears to be an alternative safe, effective, and economical approach for lumbar microdiscectomy.

Single-Segment Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Nucleus Excision on the Stability of Lumbar Segmental Sagittal Plane.

At present, lumbar disc herniation has become a problem that plagues people's health, life safety, and social and economic development. Among them, the research of lumbar disc nucleus pulposus tissue is the focus of the treatment of lumbar disc diseases. At present, the treatment methods of lumbar disc herniation are divided into conservative treatment and surgical treatment, among which surgical treatment can be divided into open surgery and minimally invasive surgery. Surgical treatment to remove the nucleus pulposus from the disc by fenestration includes conventional ablation of the nucleus pulposus and microscopic lumbar discs. This treatment is effective, but it has a great impact on the stabilization mechanism of the spine, with large soft tissue damage and large blood loss, which can easily cause nerve damage and postdural adhesions. At the same time, single-segment lumbar discectomy has also been gradually applied to the treatment of this disease. Under this, this paper studies single-segment lumbar disc nucleus pulposus resection. The lumbar nucleus resection is performed in a single segment in the physiological load area, which can greatly ensure the stability of the sagittal plane of the lumbar spine. In order to better understand the postoperative rehabilitation and clinical effects of single-segment lumbar discectomy, as well as the changes in the sagittal plane of the lumbar vertebrae before and after the operation, so as to provide a reference for further improving the quality of life of patients, this paper uses questionnaire survey and data analysis methods. According to the results of the questionnaire survey, compared with other operations, single-segment lumbar discectomy is more stable in the sagittal plane of the lumbar spine within the physiological load range, and there is less displacement. The displacement may be caused or influenced by different kinds of factors such as heavy loads or manual labor. In addition, most patients have less abnormal pain after surgery, indicating that the surgery has a certain effect on the treatment of the disease, and there are fewer abnormalities after surgery.