Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Home blood pressure monitoring provides important diagnostic information beyond in-office blood pressure readings and offers similar results to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Home blood pressure monitoring involves patients independently measuring their blood pressure with an electronic device, whereas ambulatory blood pressure monitoring involves patients wearing a portable monitor for 24 to 48 hours. Although ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is the diagnostic standard for measurement, home blood pressure monitoring is more practical and accessible to patients, and its use is recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Home blood pressure monitoring generally results in lower blood pressure readings than in-office measurements, can confirm the diagnosis of hypertension after an elevated office blood pressure reading, and can identify patients with white coat hypertension or masked hypertension. Best practices for home blood pressure monitoring include using an appropriately fitting upper-arm cuff on a bare arm, emptying the bladder, avoiding caffeinated beverages for 30 minutes before taking the measurement, resting for five minutes before taking the measurement, keeping the feet on the floor uncrossed and the arm supported with the cuff at heart level, and not talking during the reading. An average of multiple readings, ideally two readings in the morning and again in the evening separated by at least one minute each, is recommended for one week. Home blood pressure readings can be used in hypertension quality measures.

Home blood pressure monitoring in the 21st century.

Home blood pressure monitoring provides multiple measurements in the usual environment of each individual, allows the detection of intermediate hypertension phenotypes (white-coat and masked hypertension), and appears to have superior prognostic value compared to the conventional office blood pressure measurements. Accumulating evidence suggests that home blood pressure monitoring improves long-term hypertension control rates. Moreover, it is widely available, relatively inexpensive, and well accepted by patients. Thus, current guidelines recommend home blood pressure monitoring as an essential method for the evaluation of almost all untreated and treated patients with suspected or treated hypertension. Validated automated upper-arm cuff devices with automated storage and averaging of readings should be used. The home blood pressure monitoring schedule for 4 to 7 days with exclusion of the first day (12-24 readings) should be averaged to provide values for decision making.

Trends in blood pressure control and medication use during 20 years in a hypertension clinic in Japan.

Guidelines for the management of hypertension have recommended strict control of blood pressure to help prevent cardiovascular disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the current status of blood pressure control and trends over the past two decades. Four hundred patients treated for hypertension at Kyushu University Hospital were included in the present study. Blood pressure levels and prescribed antihypertensive drugs were examined in 2011. The average blood pressure was 129/74 mmHg, and the number of prescribed antihypertensive drugs was 2.2. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, alpha-blockers, and beta-blockers were prescribed in 66%, 5%, 78%, 21%, 12%, and 27% of the cases, respectively. Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher, and diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in patients aged 80 years or older compared with the younger patients (<80 and ≥80 years, 128/75 mmHg and 133/68 mmHg, respectively). The number of prescribed antihypertensive drugs was similar between the two groups. Sixty-five patients were continuously treated for 20 years. The average blood pressure of these patients significantly decreased from 142/87 mmHg in 1991 to 128/71 mmHg in 2011, accompanied with an increase in the number of antihypertensive drugs from 1.6 in 1991 to 2.7 in 2011. These findings suggest that the revised guidelines for the management of hypertension may have contributed to increased awareness and better management of blood pressure levels.

Factors Associated With Adherence to Blood Pressure Measurement Recommendations at Pediatric Primary Care Visits, Minnesota and Colorado, 2007-2010.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated blood pressure in childhood may predict increased cardiovascular risk in young adulthood. The Task Force on the Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood pressure in Children and Adolescents recommends that blood pressure be measured in children aged 3 years or older at all health care visits. Guidelines from both Bright Futures and the Expert Panel of Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents recommend annual blood pressure screening. Adherence to these guidelines is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess compliance with blood pressure screening recommendations in 2 integrated health care delivery systems. We analyzed electronic health records of 103,693 subjects aged 3 to 17 years. Probability of blood pressure measurement documented in the electronic health record was modeled as a function of visit type (well-child vs nonwell-child); patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, and body mass index; health care use; insurance type; and type of office practice or clinic department (family practice or pediatrics). RESULTS: Blood pressure was measured at 95% of well-child visits and 69% of nonwell-child outpatient visits. After adjusting for potential confounders, the percentage of nonwell-child visits with measurements increased linearly with patient age (P < .001). Overall, the proportion of children with annual blood pressure measurements was high and increased with age. Family practice clinics were more likely to adhere to blood pressure measurement guidelines compared with pediatric clinics (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These results show good compliance with recommendations for routine blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents. Findings can inform the development of EHR-based clinical decision support tools to augment blood pressure screening and recognition of prehypertension and hypertension in pediatric patients.

Trends and transient change in end-digit preference in blood pressure recording: studies of sequential and longitudinal collected primary care data.

BACKGROUND: End-digit preference (EDP) is a known cause of inaccurate BP recording. Distortion has been reported around pay-for-performance (P4P) indicators. METHODS: We studied sequential datasets (n = 148,000 to n = 900,000) and performed a longitudinal analysis of CONDUIT data (n = 250,000) over a 10-year period. We examined general trends in EDP and investigated the impact of diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) P4P targets. RESULTS: EDP reduces over time in both datasets; the percentage of patients with a zero EDP declined from 70% to 27% and 68% to 26% for SBP and DBP respectively. There is more zero EDP at the extremes of BP, but in people with chronic disease, the use of zero EDP was mainly seen at higher BP levels. P4P targets are associated with increased preference for the even end-digit just below target: in diabetes odds ratio (OR) is 1.47 (p = 0.003) for SBP, 1.19 (p = 0.09) for DBP and in CKD OR 1.65 (p < 0.001) for SBP and 1.48 (p = 0.0001) for DBP. Trends observed in pilot data were validated with a longitudinal set. CONCLUSIONS: The decline in EDP is levelling off and P4P targets are associated with sub-target-EDP. Primary care should automate BP measurement and recording.

Long term, implantable blood pressure monitoring systems.

An overview of implantable measurement systems suitable for the long-term, continuous monitoring of blood pressure is presented in this paper. The challenges, design considerations and tradeoffs inherent in these systems are overviewed and implantable sensors from both industrial and research environments are reviewed. The paper is concluded with an outlook of future directions for implantable blood pressure monitoring systems.

New techniques for assessment of vascular function.

The noninvasive measurement of hemodynamic variables associated with hypertension and cardiovascular disease processes needs to be recognized as a viable adjunct to clinical practice. This review traces the history of the inception and development of noninvasive measurement of hemodynamic variable. It then identifies well established, useful, and available devices, and then notes clinical studies verifying the clinical relevance of these measurements. Given the need to intervene earlier in the course of cardiovascular disease processes, tools are needed to assist the medical team to evaluate, prognosticate, and guide their patient's therapy correctly. It is the goal of this review to heighten the awareness and enhance and encourage the implementation of these devices in our armamentarium for the betterment of our patient's health.

Arterial pressure-based technologies: a new trend in cardiac output monitoring.

New trends in cardiovascular monitoring use the arterial pulse as a less invasive means of assessing cardiac output. When adopting a new technology into practice, three questions need to be answered: (1) is the method technologically sound?, (2) is it based on physiologic principles?, and (3) are the applications clinically important? This article provides a clinical review on the technology, physiology, and applications of a new arterial pressure-based method of determining cardiac output and stroke volume variation as an additional parameter for fluid status assessment.

[The technical possibilities in telemonitoring of physiological parameters]. / Technische Möglichkeiten des Telemonitorings physiologischer Parameter.

For decades, telemonitoring of vital parameters has been a recurring topic among experts. Because of its lack of economical advantages it has not established itself as a standard up to now. Thanks to novel wireless communication technologies such as Bluetooth or Zigbee, the enormous technological progress in mobile communication via GSM, GPRS, as well as UMTS and various radical medical changes within disease management programs, currently very promising new potentials for telemonitoring are appearing. This article summarizes the current technological developments, discusses their advantages and drawbacks, and deduces scenarios and technical requirements for future system architectures.

Future developments in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and self-blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice.

A number of factors interact to promote the increased clinical use of both ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and self-blood pressure monitoring (SBPM). These include the phasing out of mercury, evidence of the unreliability of clinic measurements, technical advances in automated blood pressure measurement, increasing evidence that out-of-office measurements give the best risk assessment, and a gradual recognition by payers of the clinical utility of ABPM and SBPM. Both ABPM and SBPM have been endorsed by the two major guidelines for managing hypertensive patients (World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension and Joint National Committee VI). The use of SBPM has grown enormously over the past few years, mostly because of direct sales to patients. Although SBPM may give a better estimate of the true blood pressure than clinic readings, there are concerns about the accuracy of the monitors in individual patients. The main clinical indication for ABPM is the diagnosis of white-coat hypertension. This requires the demonstration that the blood pressure is normal outside the clinic, which can be established using SBPM and confirmed by ABPM. Even though ABPM may save drug costs in patients with white-coat hypertension, its use may also lead to increased drug expenditure in others in whom it demonstrates suboptimal blood pressure control. SBPM has the potential to reduce the number of clinic visits and also to improve blood pressure control. The ultimate validation of both procedures will be whether they can prevent cardiovascular morbidity. There have been suggestions that a non-dipping pattern of nocturnal blood pressure may carry a bad prognosis, but this may apply only to certain disease end-points. The greater recognition of the relevance of dipping status should provide an additional stimulus to the growth of both procedures. It is anticipated that, in the future, hypertension will be managed by the 'virtual hypertension clinic', using ABPM for the initial diagnosis, and SBPM with electronic linkage between the patient and the health-care provider for maintenance and follow-up.

Assessment of blood pressure measurement quality in the baseline surveys of the WHO MONICA project.

Because of the general inavailability of reference standards, there exist no common procedures to assess the quality of blood pressure measurements in epidemiological population surveys. To approach this problem within the collaborative international WHO MONICA Project, a standardized assessment of BP measurement quality was developed and applied to the forty-seven baseline surveys of that project. The entire assessments were carried out in retrospect, that is, only after each population survey had been completed. The assessment was focused on the procedures of quality assurance and control as reportedly applied in each survey, and on quality indicators which were derived from the recorded blood pressure values of each survey. The definitions of specific quality assessment items were based on the MONICA project protocol and on sources in the pertinent literature. The available information on quality assurance and control procedures depended solely on self-reports by local survey organizers and on site visits, and was occasionally found to be at variance with the actual blood pressure recordings. Therefore, quality indicators derived from actual blood pressure recordings were far more informative and comparable between surveys. Each survey was rated as optimal, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory with regard to single quality items and these single scores were used jointly to compute a summary score of blood pressure measurement quality for each survey. This summary score indicated that 39 out of 47 MONICA baseline surveys showed optimal or satisfactory BP measurement quality. Limitations and potentials for improvement of quality assessments became apparent. We conclude that a standardized assessment of BP measurement quality in epidemiological population surveys seems feasible and propose that quality assessment methods similar to the ones suggested here become a routine part of future epidemiological analyses of blood pressure values and hypertension in populations. This should facilitate valid study comparisons.