A systematic review of pharmacoeconomic evaluations on oral diarylquinoline-based treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis: from high to low burden countries.

Introduction: There is a rising global interest in the pharmacoeconomic evaluations of bedaquiline (BDQ), a novel oral diarylquinoline, for treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB).Areas covered: This article systematically reviewed publications retrieved from Medline, American Psychological Association-Psychology information, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Science direct, Center for Reviews and Dissemination, and CINAHL Complete during 2010-2020 on pharmacoeconomic studies on BDQ for DR-TB treatment. Ten Markov model-based cost-effectiveness analyses identified were conducted in high (n = 4), intermediate (n = 2), and low (n = 4) TB burden countries.Expert opinion: The paucity of model-based health economic analyses on BDQ-containing regimens for DR-TB indicated that further pharmacoeconomic research of BDQ-based regimens, on the aspects of duration of BDQ treatment, types of DR-TB indicated, and settings of regions and health-systems, is highly warranted to inform global cost-effective use of BDQ-based regimens for DR-TB treatment.

Outcomes and adverse events of pre- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Kinshasa, Democratique Republic of the Congo: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) is a very serious form of tuberculosis that is burdened with a heavy mortality toll, especially before the advent of new TB drugs. The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is among the countries most affected by this new epidemic. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of the records of all patients with pre- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis hospitalized from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 and monitored for at least 6 months to one year after the end of their treatment in Kinshasa; an individualized therapeutic regimen with bedaquiline for 20 months was built for each patient. The adverse effects were systematically monitored. RESULTS: Of the 40 laboratory-confirmed patients, 32 (80%) patients started treatment, including 29 preXRB and 3 XDR TB patients. In the eligible group, 3 patients (9.4%) had HIV-TB coinfections. The therapeutic success rate was 53.2%, and the mortality rate was 46.8% (15/32); there were no relapses, failures or losses to follow-up. All coinfected HIV-TB patients died during treatment. The cumulative patient survival rate was 62.5% at 3 months, 53.1% at 6 months and 53.1% at 20 months. The most common adverse events were vomiting, Skin rash, anemia and peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSION: The new anti-tuberculosis drugs are a real hope for the management of Drug Resistant tuberculosis patient and other new therapeutic combinations may improve favorable outcomes.

The cost-effectiveness of a bedaquiline-containing short-course regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.

Background: Bedaquiline-containing regimens have demonstrated improved outcomes over injectable-containing regimens in the long-term treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended replacing injectables in the standard short-course regimen (SCR) with a bedaquiline-containing regimen. The South African national TB program similarly recommends a bedaquiline-containing regimen. Here, we investigated the cost-effectiveness of a bedaquiline-containing SCR versus an injectable-containing SCR for the treatment of MDR-TB in South Africa.Methods: A Markov model was adapted to simulate the incidence of active patients with MDR-TB. Patients could transition through eight health states: active MDR-TB, culture conversion, cure, follow-up loss, secondary MDR-TB, extensively DR-TB, end-of-life care, and death. A 5% discount was assumed on costs and outcomes. Health outcomes were expressed as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).Results: Over a 10-year time horizon, a bedaquiline-containing SCR dominated an injectable-containing SCR, with an incremental saving of US $982 per DALY averted. A bedaquiline-containing SCR was associated with lower total costs versus an injectable-containing SCR (US $597 versus $657 million), of which US $3.2 versus $21.9 million was attributed to adverse event management.Conclusions: Replacing an injectable-containing SCR with a bedaquiline-containing SCR is cost-effective, offering a cost-saving alternative with improved patient outcomes for MDR-TB.

Bedaquiline- versus injectable-containing drug-resistant tuberculosis regimens: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) continues to be a major public health challenge with suboptimal treatment outcomes including well-documented treatment-related toxicities. We compared the cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline (BDQ) containing regimens with injectable containing regimens (short-course regimen [SCR] and long-course regiman [LCR]) in India, Russia, and South Africa. METHODS: The analysis evaluated the direct costs of DR-TB treatment which included drugs, hospitalization, injectable-related adverse event costs, and other costs. Scenarios altered regimen costs, SCR/LCR ratio, and substitution rate between regimens (whether BDQ or injectable containing). RESULTS: BDQ containing regimens are more cost effective based on cost per treatment success compared with injectable containing regimens, reducing these in SCR by 18-20% and in LCR by 49-54%. Average cost effectiveness ratios (ACERs) of BDQ containing regimens are lower. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) is negative. Exclusive use of BDQ containing regimens results in approximately 61,000 more patients treated successfully over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Across all countries, BDQ containing regimens are dominant compared to injectable containing regimens, entailing lower treatment costs to achieve better clinical outcomes. This analysis can provide insight and support to local and global decision-makers and public health organizations to allocate efficiently resources improving patient and public health outcomes.

Impact of adverse drug reactions on the incremental cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline for drug-resistant tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common during standard, long-course treatment for multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-/RR-TB). In particular, second-line injectables (SLIs) are associated with permanent hearing loss, acute renal injury and electrolyte imbalance. We adapted an established Markov model for ambulatory treatment to estimate the impact of the toxicity profile on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for a proposed MDR-/RR-TB regimen replacing the SLI with bedaquiline (BDQ). METHODS: Treatment effectiveness was evaluated in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Clinical outcomes and ingredient costs from a provider perspective were derived from the South African public-sector treatment program or extracted from the literature. Costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3% per year over 10 years. RESULTS: A BDQ-based MDR-/RR-TB regimen compared with the SLI regimen had a mean ICER of US$516 per DALY averted using the standard Markov model. Costs for both regimens increased and effectiveness decreased for the SLI regimen once adjusted for toxicity. The resulting ICER for the BDQ-based regimen was cost saving (US$96/patient) and more effective (0.96 DALYs averted) after adjusting for ADRs. CONCLUSION: Decision-analysis models of treatment for MDR-/RR-TB, including new drug regimens, should consider the costs of managing ADRs and their sequelae.

Modeling the impact of bedaquiline treatment strategies on the multidrug-resistant tuberculosis burden in India.

SETTING: Bedaquiline (BDQ) has been approved in India for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), but is currently recommended for MDR-TB patients who have failed initial treatment with standard regimens. While some have argued that such deferred BDQ use allows a second line of defense with a potent drug, this strategy may not be optimal. OBJECTIVE: To compare several distinct scenarios of BDQ access and use, and their potential impact on the MDR-TB disease burden and the associated net economic benefit in India. METHOD: We used a state-transition model to carry out this evaluation. The scenarios differed in the timing and breadth of BDQ access. RESULTS: The simulations showed that a strategy reliant on reserving the use of BDQ for those who have failed other MDR-TB regimens is likely to result in worse treatment outcomes for patients and in inferior public health outcomes for communities, leading to reduced net monetary benefit. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that deferring patient access to new drugs such as BDQ until front-line regimens have failed, in order to 'save' these drugs for later use, could be detrimental to patients and to public health, and could reduce the economic benefit of treating MDR-TB.

Evaluación de uso de bedaquilina para pacientes con tuberculosis XDR como producto farmacéutico no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico / Evaluation of use of bedaquilin for patients with XDR tuberculosis as a pharmaceutical product not included in the Pharmacological Request

La Estratégia Sanitaria Nacional de Prevención y Control de Tuberculosis del Ministerio de Salud norma del tratamiento de los pacientes con tuberculosis a nivel nacional, incluyendo el ámbito de EsSalud; por lo que ha realizado las gestiones andt DIGEMID para la autorización de uso de bedaquilina, como medicamento no incluido en el Petitorio Nacional Único de Medicamentos Esencialies-PNUME. La bedaquilina es un fármaco con alta toxicidad, cuyo uso debe ser restringido a los casos estrictamente necesarios. La bedaquilina ha sido aprobada por la DIGEMID para el tratamiento de la tuberculosis MDR con resistencia ampliada a fluoroquinolonas o inyectabels de segunda línea (TB PRE-XDR), bajo condiciones especificadas, dentro de las cuales se encuentra el consentimiento informado del paciente y una farmacovigilancia activa y estrecha para monitorizar la aparición de efectos adversos y controlados. La Gerencia Central de Prestaciones de Salud respalda la solicitud de autorización de uso del producto farmacéutico Bedaquilina No incluidos en el Petitorio, de acuerdo a lo coordinado con la Estrategia Sanitaria Nacional de Prevención y Control de Tuberculosis del Ministerio de Salud, precisando que los expedientes de pacientes con el diagnóstico de TB XDR serán evaluados por el Comité Nacional de Evaluación de Retratamiento (CBER) de la Estrategia Sanitaria Nacional de Prevención y Control de Tuberculosis del Ministerio de Salud, quienes determinán el tratamiento respectivo. Se considera procedentes la aprobación del uso de Bedaquilina como producto farmacéutico no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de ESSALUD, para el tratamiento de pacientes con Tuberculosis Extensamente Resistente (TB XDR), considerando lo solicitado por la Gerencia Central de Prestaciones de Salud, lo establecido por la Estrategia Sanitaria Nacional de Prevención y Control de Tuberculosis, y de acuerdo al numeral 8,15 de la Directiva Número 003-IETSI-ESSALUD-2016.

Health outcomes of bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in selected high burden countries.

BACKGROUND: Less than one-third of patients who are estimated to be infected with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) receive MDR-TB treatment regimens, and only 48% of those who received treatment have successful outcomes. Despite current regimens, newer, more effective and cost-effective approaches to treatment are needed. The aim of the study was to project health outcomes and impact on healthcare resources of adding bedaquiline to the treatment regimen of MDR-TB in selected high burden countries: Estonia, Russia, South Africa, Peru, China, the Philippines, and India. METHODS: This study adapted an existing Markov model to estimate the health outcomes and impact on total healthcare costs of adding bedaquiline to current MDR-TB treatment regimens. A price threshold analysis was conducted to determine the price range at which bedaquiline would be cost-effective. RESULTS: Adding bedaquiline to the background regimen (BR) resulted in increased disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, and reduced total healthcare costs (excluding treatment acquisition costs) compared with BR alone in all countries analyzed. Addition of bedaquiline to BR resulted in savings to healthcare costs compared with BR alone in all countries analyzed, with the highest impact expected in Russia (US$194 million) and South Africa (US$43 million). The price per regimen at which bedaquiline would be cost-effective ranged between US$23,904-US$203,492 in Estonia, Russia, Peru, South Africa, and China (high and upper middle-income countries) and between US$6,996-US$20,323 in the Philippines and India (lower middle-income countries); however, these cost-effective prices do not necessarily address concerns about affordability. CONCLUSIONS: Adding bedaquiline to BR provides improvements in health outcomes and reductions in healthcare costs in high MDR-TB burden countries. The range of prices per regimen for which bedaquiline would be cost-effective varied between countries.