Prevalence of Enteric Infections in Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Impact on Management and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Stool pathogen testing is recommended as part of the initial evaluation for patients with new-onset diarrhea on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), yet its significance has not been well-studied. We aimed to determine the impact of multiplex gastrointestinal (GI) pathogen PCR testing on the clinical course and use of immunosuppressive therapy in patients who develop diarrhea on ICIs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included individuals who underwent GI pathogen panel PCR for diarrhea on ICIs at Memorial Sloan Kettering between 7/2015 and 7/2021. The primary outcome was use of immunosuppressive therapy for suspected immunotherapy-related enterocolitis (irEC). Secondary outcomes included diarrhea severity and endoscopic and histologic disease patterns. RESULTS: Among 521 ICI-treated patients tested for GI pathogens, 61 (11.7%) had a positive PCR. Compared to patients without detectable infections, patients with infections had more frequent grades 3-4 diarrhea (37.7% vs. 19.6%, P < .01) and colitis (39.3% vs. 14.7%, P < .01). However, patients with infections did not have higher rates of persistent or recurrent diarrhea and were less likely to receive steroids (P < .01) and second-line immunosuppressive agents (P = .03). In 105 patients with lower endoscopy, similar trends were observed and no differences in endoscopic severity or histologic patterns were noted between groups. CONCLUSIONS: GI infections in ICI-treated patients presenting with diarrhea are linked to more severe but self-limited clinical presentations and may be optimally treated with observation and supportive care alone. Routine and timely stool pathogen testing may help avert unnecessary empiric immunosuppression for suspected irEC, which has been linked to blunted antitumor responses and numerous adverse effects.

Immune checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced diarrhea and Colitis: Incidence and Management. A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved cancer outcomes. However, immune-related adverse effects are common. The aim was to investigate the incidence of diarrhea and colitis of ICIs alone and in combination with chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), histopathological findings, and management. METHODS: Two separate studies, including meta-analyses, were performed. Key inclusion criteria were for Study I) phase I-IV trials, and data on diarrhea and/or colitis; for Study II) studies describing histopathologic and endoscopic findings and/or biologic treatment for ICI-induced colitis. RESULTS: The incidence of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody-induced diarrhea and colitis was 10% and 2%, respectively, with no clinically relevant differences between the compounds. The CTLA-4 inhibitor, ipilimumab, induced diarrhea and colitis in 33% and 7% of patients, respectively, whereas the incidence of diarrhea and colitis following ipilimumab combined with nivolumab was 21%-37% and 4%-8%, depending on regimen. The incidence of all-grade diarrhea following ICIs combined with chemotherapy or TKIs was high (17%-56%), whereas only 0.5% of patients developed severe (≥grade 3) colitis. The main patterns of histopathologic presentation after PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitor mono- or combination therapy were acute and chronic active colitis and microscopic colitis-like. Infliximab and vedolizumab were equally effective against ICI-induced colitis. CONCLUSION: Expanding treatment options include combinations of ICIs and chemotherapy/TKI with a high incidence of diarrhea and a low incidence of colitis; thus, a potential risk of overtreatment with corticosteroids exists. We suggest a more tailored approach, particularly for the management of low-grade diarrhea. Prospective clinical trials are needed to refine management.

Immunotherapy-induced Colitis: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Workup, and Management Plan.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of a variety of malignancies including advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancers among others. Since their introduction, there has been significant improvement in survival and prognosis in patients with advanced malignancies. Unfortunately, improved outcomes have come at a price of significant immune-related adverse events, with those of the gastrointestinal tract being the most common. Gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events frequently present as diarrhea and colitis, the severity of which can range from mild diarrhea to fulminant colitis with intestinal perforation. Currently, management of ICI-induced colitis is primarily guided by retrospective studies and expert opinion. A significant number of ICI-induced colitis responds to high-dose corticosteroids; however, some patients require further therapy with biologics. There is limited information on the factors which may predispose patients to ICI-induced colitis. Future research elucidating these risk factors along with development of a scoring system could allow for risk-stratification of patients before initiation of ICI therapy. Such a system may help clinicians and patients keep a high index of suspicion regarding ICI-induced colitis and could hopefully reduce the incidence of severe cases. Similarly, future studies should investigate protective factors against ICI-induced colitis, which could potentially allow more patients to safely benefit from ICI therapy.

Incidence and management of pyrotinib-associated diarrhea in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The PHOEBE study showed that pyrotinib is an alternative treatment option for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer after trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Diarrhea was a common adverse event that could compromise or modify treatment administration. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients receiving a pyrotinib-based regimen between August 2018 and January 2021. The risk of diarrhea with 95% confidence limits (CLs) was calculated and management was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 46 HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients were enrolled. Diarrhea of any grade occurred in 100% of patients, and grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 52.2% (n=24) of patients. Treatment dose modification was implemented in 39.1% (n=18) of advanced breast cancer patients. Compared with other treatment regimens, patients receiving pyrotinib plus vinorelbine suffered the highest risk of diarrhea (60%), though no significant difference was confirmed (P=0.77). Antidiarrheal agents were commonly used and loperamide-based regimens achieved an ideal antidiarrheal effect (95.3-100%), while non-loperamide-based regimens (such as montmorillonite powder) had a lower control rate (78.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Diarrhea was a common adverse event of pyrotinib-based treatment, and approximately 50% of patients suffered high grade diarrhea. Loperamide-based antidiarrheal agents could commendably manage most episodes.

Neratinib as extended adjuvant therapy in patients with copositive early breast cancer: German health technology assessment-driven analyses from the ExteNET study.

BACKGROUND: Neratinib is approved in the European Union for extended adjuvant treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive/hormone receptor-positive (copositive) early breast cancer ≤1 year of completion of prior trastuzumab-based therapy. Here, we report analyses of the hormone receptor-positive subgroup (N = 1631) from the ExteNET trial performed for the German health technology assessment (HTA). RESULTS: With 2 years of median follow-up, HTA analyses revealed a significant advantage in disease-free survival (DFS) for neratinib vs. placebo (absolute/relative risk reduction: 4.1/48.2%; hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.45 [0.29; 0.69]; p = 0.0002), consistent with distant DFS (absolute/relative risk reduction: 3.1/46.3%; HR [95% CI]: 0.52 [0.32; 0.84]; p = 0.0082). The 5-year follow-up confirmed this outcome.Quality of life analyses did not show clinically relevant differences over all time points. Only at month 1, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General total score revealed a statistically relevant difference to the disadvantage of neratinib classified as clinically relevant. The tolerability profile of neratinib was dominated by gastrointestinal events, mainly diarrhoea (all grades: 94.4%; grade III: 39.4%; no systematic antidiarrhoeal prophylaxis), nausea (all grades/grade III: 43.9/1.6%), vomiting (26.6/3.2%), abdominal pain (23.8/1.9%), fatigue (28.1/1.9%) and rash (14.3/0.4%). No cumulative or irreversible toxicities were observed. As shown in the CONTROL study and instituted via a risk management plan, diarrhoea management can reduce frequency, cumulative duration and severity of diarrhoea. CONCLUSION: Extended adjuvant neratinib provides a clinically relevant benefit with further incremental reduction of relapse risk in the curative setting. Accordingly, the German HTA authority has granted an added benefit for this new treatment option.

Assessment of diarrhea as side effect of oral targeted antineoplastic agents in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is one of the most frequent class adverse events associated with targeted oral antineoplastic agents (OAAs). Our objective was to analyze the incidence, characteristics, and severity of diarrhea in cancer patients in clinical practice. METHODS: An observational, longitudinal, and prospective study of cancer outpatients treated with targeted OAAs was carried out in a tertiary hospital. Targed OAAs analyzed were anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors, BCR-ABL inhibitors, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors. Patients were given a data collection form to record daily the number, severity (CTCAE version 5.0), and characteristics of stools during the first 30 days of treatment with OAAs. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with the incidence of diarrhea. RESULTS: We analyzed 240 patients, of whom 28.7% experienced diarrhea (25.4% grades 1-2 and 3.3% grades 3-4). Patients treated with EGFR and VEGFR inhibitors had a higher incidence of diarrhea. The multivariate analysis revealed that taking the OAA with food was associated with a lower risk of diarrhea (OR = 0.404 [0.205-0.956], p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: More than a third of patients in treatment with OAAs presented diarrhea (any grade), and 22.1% of stools were semi-liquid/liquid. In multivariate analysis, taking the OAA on an empty stomach was associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of diarrhea.

Designing better input support programs: Lessons from zinc subsidies in Andhra Pradesh, India.

India has one of the largest agricultural input support programs in the world, delivered in the form of subsidies to farmers, raising concerns about its sustainability. This paper evaluates the performance of one such support, the micronutrient subsidy program in the state of Andhra Pradesh (AP) and presents a case for providing this support in the form of direct cash transfers. Under the program, key soil micronutrients- zinc, boron, and gypsum were distributed free of cost to farmers living in micronutrient-deficient areas, with identification and targeting managed entirely by the state. We survey 1621 farmers, 61 agriculture extension officers, and 78 agriculture input dealers to assess the efficacy of the program and to identify bottlenecks preventing effective targeting, with a focus on zinc. We find that use of non-subsidized zinc is high in AP, and awareness of benefits of zinc and physical access to input dealer shops are significant predictors of zinc use. We argue that the free provision of micronutrients may have created demand among farmers, but there is little justification to continue subsidizing such a program at such high rates or resorting to public distribution. We find that micronutrient procurement and distribution has become a burden on extension staff and crowds out the private sector. Our analysis shows that the subsidy can benefit more farmers if it is channeled through the network of private fertilizer dealers. We use administrative data on budgetary outlays and digital soil maps to suggest fiscal redistribution in the form of direct cash transfers that may ensure more effective targeting at a lower cost to the state.

Incidence and Management of Diarrhea With Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The APHINITY (BIG 4-11) study showed that pertuzumab significantly improved the rates of invasive disease-free survival among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, operable breast cancer when added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Because diarrhea was a common adverse event that could compromise treatment administration, we evaluated the incidence and management of diarrhea in the APHINITY study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The APHINITY trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy and 1 year of trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab or placebo. The diarrhea incidence, severity (National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 4.0), onset, and management were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 4805 patients were randomized. Diarrhea of any grade was the most common adverse event and occurred in 71% of patients in the pertuzumab arm versus 45% in the placebo arm. Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10% and 4% in the pertuzumab and placebo arms, respectively. The greatest incidence of diarrhea was reported during the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and taxane (61% vs. 34% of patients experienced an event with pertuzumab vs. placebo, respectively). A marked decrease was observed on chemotherapy cessation. Antidiarrheal agents were commonly used, and diarrhea rarely caused treatment dose modifications or discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Diarrhea was a common adverse event in the APHINITY study. Most episodes were low grade and were generally manageable with common antidiarrheal agents. The incidence of diarrhea was greater with the combination of a taxane and HER2-targeted treatment and decreased once chemotherapy was stopped.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors induced diarrhea and colitis: a review of incidence, pathogenesis and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diarrhea and colitis are among the most commonly encountered immune-mediated adverse events among patients receiving antiprogrammed cell death protein/ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) as well as anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies. With growing indications and widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, it is imperative to summarize the current body of evidence concerning the incidence, pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, and treatment options currently available for the management of immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis. Additionally, with emerging evidence analyzing the resumption of immune checkpoint inhibitors, it is pivotal to summarize our current understanding and future challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis can potentially be a viable surrogate marker for improved survival as it is validated further in large-scale studies. Early endoscopic evaluation can aid in the identification of patients at risk of developing steroid refractory immune-mediated colitis, and hence can be chosen to receive early add-on therapy with infliximab, vedolizumab or fecal microbiota transplantation, an emerging treatment option for immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis. Resuming immune checkpoint inhibitors carries a manageable risk of recurrent diarrhea and colitis, with most cases being mild and effectively managed with immunosuppressive therapy. SUMMARY: As our understanding of immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis grows, it is likely that this clinicopathologic entity will represent more than just an adverse event. With a growing number of treatment options, the management algorithms for immune-mediated diarrhea/colitis are likely to evolve in the future.

Assessment of the administration of maropitant and loperamide to dogs with cancer for the prevention and reduction of adverse effects associated with the administration of paclitaxel.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of maropitant and loperamide for the prevention and reduction of adverse gastrointestinal effects associated with administration of paclitaxel to dogs with cancer. ANIMALS: 168 dogs with cancer. PROCEDURES: The study comprised 2 phases. For phase 1, dogs in the intervention group were administered maropitant and loperamide followed by paclitaxel. Outcomes were compared with those for a control group that received only maropitant and paclitaxel. For phase 2, all dogs of phase 1 that did not receive maropitant and loperamide and that had adverse gastrointestinal effects were enrolled; they received maropitant and loperamide and another dose of paclitaxel. RESULTS: In phase 1, significantly fewer dogs in the intervention group had adverse effects. For dogs that had adverse effects, the intervention group had a lower severity of lack of appetite and lethargy. Also, adverse effects for dogs in the intervention group were of significantly shorter duration than for the control group. In phase 2, significant reductions in adverse effects were observed after administration of maropitant and loperamide. In those dogs that still had adverse effects after administration of maropitant and loperamide, there was a significant reduction in severity of signs of nausea and lethargy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A combination of maropitant and loperamide was found to be safe for use and effective for reducing or preventing signs of paclitaxel-induced gastrointestinal effects in dogs.

Association of Antibiotic Treatment With Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for an Asthma Exacerbation Treated With Systemic Corticosteroids.

Importance: Although professional society guidelines discourage use of empirical antibiotics in the treatment of asthma exacerbation, high antibiotic prescribing rates have been recorded in the United States and elsewhere. Objective: To determine the association of antibiotic treatment with outcomes among patients hospitalized for asthma and treated with corticosteroids. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of data of 19 811 adults hospitalized for asthma exacerbation and treated with systemic corticosteroids in 542 US acute care hospitals from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2016. Exposures: Early antibiotic treatment, defined as an treatment with an antibiotic initiated during the first 2 days of hospitalization and prescribed for a minimum of 2 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay. Other measures were treatment failure (initiation of mechanical ventilation, transfer to the intensive care unit after hospital day 2, in-hospital mortality, or readmission for asthma) within 30 days of discharge, hospital costs, and antibiotic-related diarrhea. Multivariable adjustment, propensity score matching, propensity weighting, and instrumental variable analysis were used to assess the association of antibiotic treatment with outcomes. Results: Of the 19 811 patients, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 46 (34-59) years, 14 389 (72.6%) were women, 8771 (44.3%) were white, and Medicare was the primary form of health insurance for 5120 (25.8%). Antibiotics were prescribed for 8788 patients (44.4%). Compared with patients not treated with antibiotics, treated patients were older (median [IQR] age, 48 [36-61] vs 45 [32-57] years), more likely to be white (48.6% vs 40.9%) and smokers (6.6% vs 5.3%), and had a higher number of comorbidities (eg, congestive heart failure, 6.2% vs 5.8%). Those treated with antibiotics had a significantly longer hospital stay (median [IQR], 4 [3-5] vs 3 [2-4] days) and a similar rate of treatment failure (5.4% vs 5.8%). In propensity score-matched analysis, receipt of antibiotics was associated with a 29% longer hospital stay (length of stay ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.31) and higher cost of hospitalization (median [IQR] cost, $4776 [$3219-$7373] vs $3641 [$2346-$5942]) but with no difference in the risk of treatment failure (propensity score-matched OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.11). Multivariable adjustment, propensity score weighting, and instrumental variable analysis as well as several sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Conclusions and Relevance: Antibiotic therapy may be associated with a longer hospital length of stay, higher hospital cost, and similar risk of treatment failure. These results highlight the need to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing among patients hospitalized for asthma.

Assessment of dose-response relationship of 5-fluorouracil to murine intestinal injury.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most frequently prescribed anti-tumor drug, but has been reported to result in intestinal injury. Although some progress has been made in understanding the intestinal toxicity of 5-FU, confusion remains about animal models of 5-FU-induced intestinal injury, especially the dosage of 5-FU. This study aims to assess the dose-response relationship between the severity of intestinal injury and different doses of 5-FU, and to determine a proper dosing for the murine model. We found that mice in the 5-FU groups gradually lost body weight over time. Increasing doses of 5-FU resulted in more severe diarrhea, with a concomitant increase in mortality. Histopathological damage was more severe in mice that received higher doses of 5-FU. In addition, plasma diamine oxidase (DAO) activity decreased in experimental mice with intestinal injury in a dose-dependent way. TUNEL and western blot analysis showed cell apoptosis in the ileum and colon related to 5-FU dosage. However, administration of 200 and 400 mg/kg 5-FU caused extremely high mortality, severe diarrhea and histopathological damage, but 25 mg/kg 5-FU did not result in significant intestinal injury. The severity of intestinal injury induced by 5-FU appeared to be dose-dependent and we concluded that the proper dosage of 5-FU to induce a murine model with intestinal mucositis ranged from 50 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg.

Economic evaluation of S. boulardii CNCM I-745 for prevention of antibioticassociated diarrhoea in hospitalized patients.

Interest in administration of probiotics to prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD) in hospitalized patients is increasing. We determined the cost of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in hospital settings for non-complicated and Clostridium difficile (C.diff) complicated AAD, and performed a health-economic analysis of AAD prevention with S. boulardii CNCM I-745 (S. boulardii) from data collected in 1 university and 3 regional hospitals in Flanders. Using a decision tree analytic model, costs and effects of S. boulardii for AAD prevention are calculated. Incremental costs due to AAD, including increased length of hospitalization, were calculated using bottom-up and top-down costing approaches from a hospital, healthcare payer (HCP) and societal perspective. Model robustness was tested using sensitivity analyses. Additional costs per hospitalized patient range from € 277.4 (hospital) to € 2,150.3 (societal) for non-complicated and from € 588.8 (hospital) to € 2,239.1 (societal) for C. diff. complicated AAD. Using S. boulardii as AAD prevention results in cost savings between € 50.3 (bottom-up) and € 28.1 (topdown) per patient treated with antibiotics from the HCP perspective; and € 95.2 and € 14.7 per patient from the societal and hospital perspectives. Our analysis shows the potential for using S. boulardii as AAD prophylactic treatment in hospitalized patients. Based on 831,655 hospitalizations with antibiotic administration in 2014 and € 50.3 cost saving per patient on antibiotics, generalized use of S. boulardii could result in total annual savings up to € 41.8 million for the Belgian HCP.

Development and preliminary testing of a brief clinical tool to enable daily monitoring of chemotherapy toxicity: The Daily Chemotherapy Toxicity self-Assessment Questionnaire.

Close monitoring of chemotherapy toxicity can be instrumental in ensuring prompt symptom management and quality care. Our aim was to develop a brief clinical tool to enable daily assessment of chemotherapy toxicity and investigate/establish its content validity, feasibility/applicability, internal consistency and stability. Development of the Daily Chemotherapy Toxicity self-Assessment Questionnaire (DCTAQ) was based on an initial item pool created from two scoping reviews. Expert panel review (n = 15) and cognitive debriefing with patients with cancer (n = 7) were used to establish content validity. Feasibility/acceptability, applicability (self-report vs. interview-like administration), internal consistency (KR-20) and test-retest reliability (at 1-hr intervals) of the DCTAQ were field-tested with 82 patients with breast or colorectal cancer receiving active chemotherapy at eight hospitals. Initial development/content validity stages enabled item revisions and re-wording that led to a final, 11-item DCTAQ version with 10 core symptom items plus one open-ended "any other symptom" item. Feasibility and acceptability were demonstrated through the absence of participant withdrawals, absence of missing data and no complaints about tool length. The DCTAQ was found to have modest internal consistency (KR-20 = 0.56), but very good test-retest reliability. The DCTAQ is a brief clinical tool that allows for rapid and accurate daily assessments of chemotherapy toxicity in clinical practice.

A continuous-time multistate Markov model to describe the occurrence and severity of diarrhea events in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with lumretuzumab in combination with pertuzumab and paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: To inform lumretuzumab and pertuzumab dose modifications in order to decrease the incidence, severity, and duration of the diarrhea events in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with a combination therapy of lumretuzumab (anti-HER3) in combination with pertuzumab (anti-HER2) and paclitaxel using quantitative clinical pharmacology modeling approaches. METHODS: The safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) data from three clinical trials (lumretuzumab monotherapy n = 47, pertuzumab monotherapy n = 78, and the combination therapy of lumretuzumab, pertuzumab and paclitaxel n = 35) were pooled together to develop a continuous-time discrete states Markov model describing the dynamics of the diarrhea events. RESULTS: The model was able to capture the time course of different severities of diarrhea reasonably well. The effect of lumretuzumab and pertuzumab was well described by an Emax function indicating an increased rate of transition from moderate to mild or more severe diarrhea with higher doses. The concentration needed to trigger or worsen diarrhea episodes was estimated to be 120-fold lower in combination therapy compared to monotherapy, suggesting strong synergy between the two monoclonal antibodies. The prophylactic effect of loperamide in a subset of patients was also well captured by the model with a clear tendency to reduce the occurrence of diarrhea events. CONCLUSIONS: This work shows that PK-toxicity modeling provides insight into how the severity of key adverse events evolves over time and highlights the potential use to support decision making in drug development.

Safety Experience During Real-World Use of Injectable Artesunate in Public Health Facilities in Ghana and Uganda: Outcomes of a Modified Cohort Event Monitoring Study (CEMISA).

INTRODUCTION: Injectable artesunate (Inj AS) is the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended product for treating severe malaria. However, despite widespread usage, there are few published safety studies involving large populations in real-world settings. In this study, we sought to assess the incidence of common adverse events (AEs) following the intake of Inj AS in real-life settings. METHODS: This is a modified cohort event monitoring study involving patients who were administered with Inj AS at eight sites (four each in Ghana and Uganda) between May and December 2016. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had severe/complicated malaria and were able and willing to participate in the study. Eligible patients were followed up by telephone or hospital or home visit on Days 7, 14, 21 and 28 after drug administration to document AEs and serious AEs (SAEs). Patients were also encouraged to report all AEs at any time during the study period. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the proportion of patients with any AEs by end of Day 28. Causality assessment was made on all AEs/SAEs using the WHO/UMC (Uppsala Monitoring Centre) causality method. RESULTS: A total of 1103 eligible patients were administered Inj AS, of which 360 patients were in Ghana and 743 in Uganda. The incidence of any AE by the end of follow-up among patients treated with AS was estimated to be 17.9% (197/1103) (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.8-20.3). The median time-to-onset of any AEs was 9 days (interquartile range (IQR) = 4, 14). The top five AEs recorded among patients treated with AS were pyrexia (3.5%), abdominal pain (2.5%), diarrhoea (1.7%), cough (1.5%) and asthenia (1.5%). Most of these top five AEs occurred in the first 14 days following treatment. Regarding the relatedness of these AEs to Inj AS, 78.9% of pyrexia (30/38), 63.0% of pain (17/27), 68.4% of diarrhoea (13/19), 85.5% of cough (14/16) and 75.0% of asthenia (12/16) were assessed as 'possibly' related. There were 17 SAEs including 13 deaths. Two of the deaths are 'possibly' related to Inj AS, as were three non-fatal SAEs: severe abdominal pain, failure of therapy and severe anaemia. CONCLUSION: The incidence of common AEs among patients treated with Inj AS in real-world settings was found to be relatively low. Future studies should consider larger cohorts to document rare AEs as well. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02817919.

Assessment and management of diarrhea following VEGF receptor TKI treatment in patients with ovarian cancer.

Angiogenesis is a proven clinical target for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) offer patients potential new treatment regimens as they can be given as monotherapy, in combination with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, or with and following cytotoxic chemotherapy. If VEGFR-TKIs are licensed for use in ovarian cancer, patients will require prompt and effective management of adverse events, including diarrhea, to optimize compliance and benefit. As diarrhea is one of the most prevalent toxicities of this class of drug, it is important to consider the potential causes, be they disease related (bowel obstruction), treatment related (VEGFR-TKI-related or infective/neutropenic septic diarrhea when patients are receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy combined with VEGFR inhibitor treatment), or incurred through diet. Here, we provide an overview of the possible mechanisms responsible for VEGFR-TKI-induced diarrhea. We review potential interventions that can help in the management of diarrhea induced by VEGFR-TKIs, when used in combination or as single agents, and we provide a diarrhea treatment algorithm to serve as a clinical reference point for the management of diarrhea in patients with ovarian cancer treated with a VEGFR-TKI in combination with chemotherapy or PARP inhibitors, or as monotherapy.

Pathological assessment of gastrointestinal biopsies from patients with idelalisib-associated diarrhea and colitis.

AIM: Idelalisib (IDELA) treatment is associated with diarrhea/colitis (incidence of ∼15% grade ≥3). We performed a retrospective analysis of gastrointestinal biopsies from 29 patients treated with IDELA across nine clinical trials. METHODS: A central core laboratory performed histopathologic review, immunohistochemistry, and droplet digital PCR viral studies. These results were correlated with tissue immune profiling data and morphologic features per modified Geboes score. RESULTS: Out of 29 eligible patients with abdominal pain or diarrhea, 24 (82.8%) had reported adverse event terms of diarrhea and/or colitis. Infectious pathogens were detected in 9/29 samples. Most biopsies presented with mixed/inflammatory infiltrates and contained increased numbers of FOXP3+ cells versus normal controls. CONCLUSION: This study revealed evidence of T-cell dysregulation and a substantial infectious component in association with IDELA-related diarrhea/colitis.

Treatment decisions, clinical outcomes, and pharmacoeconomics in the treatment of patients with EGFR mutated stage III/IV NSCLC in Germany: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated treatment decisions and outcomes in a cohort of predominately Caucasian patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFR Mut+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: REASON (NCT00997230) was a non-interventional study in German patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Secondary endpoints for EGFR Mut + NSCLC included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse event (AE) management, and pharmacoeconomic outcomes. RESULTS: Among 334 patients with EGFR Mut + NSCLC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were the most common first-line therapy (56.6%, 53.0% gefitinib). Among patients who received TKIs/gefitinib before first disease progression, PFS was longer compared with those who did not receive a TKI (median 10.1/10.0 vs. 7.0 months; HR 0.67/0.69; log-rank p = 0.012/p = 0.022). OS was longer for those patients who ever received a TKI/gefitinib during their complete therapy course compared with those who never received a TKI (median 18.4/18.1 vs. 13.6 months; HR 0.53/0.55; p = 0.003/p = 0.005). Total mean first-line treatment healthcare costs per person were higher for those receiving TKIs (€46,443) compared with those who received chemotherapy (€27,182). Mean outpatient and inpatient costs were highest with chemotherapy. Rash, diarrhea, and dry skin were the most commonly reported AEs for patients receiving gefitinib. CONCLUSIONS: In REASON, TKI therapy was the most common first- and second-line treatment for EGFR Mut + NSCLC, associated with increased drug costs compared with chemotherapy. Patients who received gefitinib or a TKI ever during their complete therapy course had prolonged PFS and OS compared with patients who did not receive a TKI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on October, 2009 with ClinicalTrials.gov : https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00997230?term=NCT00997230&rank=1.