Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 91
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Vasa ; 53(1): 68-76, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38047756

RESUMO

Background: Current evidence indicates that erectile dysfunction (ED) is an independent risk factor for future cardiovascular events. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of screening and subsequent preventive treatment for cardiovascular risk factors among men newly diagnosed with ED from the Swiss healthcare system perspective. Methods: Based on known data on ED and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence and incidence costs and effects of a screening intervention for cardiovascular risk including corresponding cardiovascular prevention in men with ED were calculated for the Swiss population over a period of 10 years. Results: Screening and cardiovascular prevention over a period of 10 years in Swiss men with ED of all seriousness degrees, moderate and severe ED only, or severe ED only can probably avoid 41,564, 35,627, or 21,206 acute CVD events, respectively. Number needed to screen (NNS) to prevent one acute CVD event is 30, 23, and 10, respectively. Costs for the screening intervention are expected to be covered at the seventh, the fifth, and the first year, respectively. Conclusion: Screening and intervention for cardiovascular risk factors in men suffering from ED is a cost-effective tool not only to strengthen prevention and early detection of cardiovascular diseases but also to avoid future cardiovascular events.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Disfunção Erétil , Masculino , Humanos , Disfunção Erétil/diagnóstico , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fatores de Risco , Suíça/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas
3.
Future Oncol ; 18(14): 1733-1744, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35172586

RESUMO

Objective: We aimed to assess the long-term association of therapeutic strategies with urinary, sexual function and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) for 5-year prostate cancer (PC) survivors. Materials & methods: The VICAN survey consisted of self-reported data prospectively collected, including living conditions, treatment side effects and quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors. Results: Among the 434 PC survivors, 52.8% reported urinary incontinence (UI) and 55.8% reported erectile dysfunction (ED). Patients treated with radical prostatectomy with salvage radiotherapy reported significantly more UI (p = 0.014) and more ED (p = 0.012) compared with other strategies. UI was significantly associated with physical and mental health-related QoL (p = 0.045 and p = 0.049, respectively). Conclusion: Self-assessed functional outcomes 5 years after PC diagnosis remain poor and could have an impact on health-related QoL.


Patients treated for prostate cancer may have long-term consequences due to the treatment they receive ­ in particular urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED). We analyzed self-reported data from 434 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer 5 years earlier, focusing especially on treatment side effects and the impact on patient quality of life. Of these patients, 52.8% reported UI and 55.8% reported ED. Patients treated with surgery plus radiotherapy reported significantly more UI and more ED compared with other treatment strategies. We have also shown that UI has an impact on physical and mental quality of life of these patients. In conclusion, functional recovery 5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis remains poor and requires implementation of new, long-term management strategies for cancer survivors.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Neoplasias da Próstata , Incontinência Urinária , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Autorrelato , Incontinência Urinária/diagnóstico , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia
5.
Urology ; 156: 169-172, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33992665

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To review medical malpractice trends and to identify the most common claims filed against medical providers for the management of patients with priapism. METHODS: Using the Westlaw legal database, a search was done for the keyword "priapism" between July 1, 1980 and July 1, 2020. Cases were evaluated for plaintiff demographics, reasons for filing claims, management outcomes, legal verdicts and awards and further categorized based upon the timing of the alleged malpractice. RESULTS: Alleged negligence during the pre-management period was cited in 30 cases. Administration of psychotropic medications was the most common reasons for filing pre-management claims 22/56 (39.3%). Delay in care accounted for 18/56 (32.1%) and complications of surgery were 5/56 (8.9%) of claims. The majority of the completed cases were in favor of the defendants (39/47; 83.0%). There was no association between type of health care provider or timing of alleged malpractice and ultimate verdict. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing psychoactive medications without warning of the adverse effect profile is the most common reason for claims filed against providers with trazodone as the leading medication. Medical providers should ensure that patients are well informed of this adverse effect prior to prescription. Regardless, the majority of medical malpractice cases carry a verdict in favor of the defendant.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Imperícia , Priapismo , Psicotrópicos , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/tendências , Priapismo/epidemiologia , Priapismo/terapia , Psicotrópicos/administração & dosagem , Psicotrópicos/efeitos adversos , Trazodona/administração & dosagem , Trazodona/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(2): e2036337, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33599772

RESUMO

Importance: Combining 2 first-line treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED) or initiating other modalities in addition to a first-line therapy may produce beneficial outcomes. Objective: To assess whether different ED combination therapies were associated with improved outcomes compared with first-line ED monotherapy in various subgroups of patients with ED. Data Sources: Studies were identified through a systematic search in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception of these databases to October 10, 2020. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials or prospective interventional studies of the outcomes of combination therapy vs recommended monotherapy in men with ED were identified. Only comparative human studies, which evaluated the change from baseline of self-reported erectile function using validated questionnaires, that were published in any language were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction and synthesis were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: A meta-analysis was conducted that included randomized clinical trials that compared outcomes of combination therapy with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors plus another agent vs PDE5 inhibitor monotherapy. Separate analyses were performed for the mean International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score change from baseline and the number of adverse events (AEs) by different treatment modalities and subgroups of patients. Results: A total of 44 studies included 3853 men with a mean (SD) age of 55.8 (11.9) years. Combination therapy compared with monotherapy was associated with a mean IIEF score improvement of 1.76 points (95% CI, 1.27-2.24; I2 = 77%; 95% PI, -0.56 to 4.08). Adding daily tadalafil, low-intensity shockwave therapy, vacuum erectile device, folic acid, metformin hydrochloride, or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was associated with a significant IIEF score improvement, but each measure was based on only 1 study. Specifically, the weighted mean difference (WMD) in IIEF score was 1.70 (95% CI, 0.79-2.61) for the addition of daily tadalafil, 3.50 (95% CI, 0.22-6.78) for the addition of low-intensity shockwave therapy, 8.40 (95% CI, 4.90-11.90) for the addition of a vacuum erectile device, 3.46 (95% CI, 2.16-4.76) for the addition of folic acid, 4.90 (95% CI, 2.82-6.98) for the addition of metformin hydrochloride and 2.07 (95% CI, 1.37-2.77) for the addition of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The addition of α-blockers to PDE5 inhibitors was not associated with improvement in IIEF score (WMD, 0.80; 95% CI, -0.06 to 1.65; I2 = 72%). Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy was associated with improved IIEF score in patients with hypogonadism (WMD, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.99-2.23; I2 = 0%), monotherapy-resistant ED (WMD, 4.38; 95% CI, 2.37-6.40; I2 = 52%), or prostatectomy-induced ED (WMD, 5.47; 95% CI, 3.11-7.83; I2 = 53%). The treatment-related AEs did not differ between combination therapy and monotherapy (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.66-1.85; I2 = 78%). Despite multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses, the levels of heterogeneity remained high. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that combination therapy of PDE5 inhibitors and antioxidants was associated with improved ED without increasing the AEs. Treatment with PDE5 inhibitors and daily tadalafil, shockwaves, or a vacuum device was associated with additional improvement, but this result was based on limited data. These findings suggest that combination therapy is safe, associated with improved outcomes, and should be considered as a first-line therapy for refractory, complex, or difficult-to-treat cases of ED.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/uso terapêutico , Equipamentos e Provisões , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Tratamento por Ondas de Choque Extracorpóreas , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ácido Fólico/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Citrato de Sildenafila/uso terapêutico , Tadalafila/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Complexo Vitamínico B/uso terapêutico
7.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(2): 301-308, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31590961

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The oncological outcomes in men with clinically significant prostate cancer following focal cryotherapy are promising, although functional outcomes are under-reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of focal cryotherapy on urinary and sexual function, specifically assessing return to baseline function. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between October 2013 and November 2016, 58 of 122 men who underwent focal cryotherapy for predominantly anterior clinically significant localised prostate cancer within a prospective registry returned patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires, which included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) questionnaires. INTERVENTION: Standard cryotherapy procedure using either the SeedNet or the Visual-ICE cryotherapy system. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary outcome was return to baseline function of IPSS score and IIEF erectile function (EF) subdomain. Cumulative incidence and Cox-regression analyses were performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Probability of returning to baseline IPSS function was 78% at 12 mo and 87% at both 18 and 24 mo, with recovery seen up to 18 mo. For IIEF (EF domain), the probability of returning to baseline function was 85% at 12 mo and 89% at both 18 and 24 mo, with recovery seen up to 18 mo. Only the preoperative IIEF-EF score was associated with a poor outcome (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.93-0.999, p = 0.04). The main limitation was that only half of the patients returned their questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: In men undergoing primary focal cryotherapy, there is a high degree of preservation of urinary and erectile function with return to baseline function occurring from 3 mo and continuing up to 18 mo after focal cryotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In men who underwent focal cryotherapy for prostate cancer, approximately nine in 10 returned to their baseline urinary and sexual function. Keeping in mind that level 1 evidence and long-term data are still needed, in men who wish to preserve urinary and sexual function, focal cryotherapy may be considered an alternative treatment option to radical therapy.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Neoplasias da Próstata , Crioterapia , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia
8.
Urology ; 149: 140-145, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33309705

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the annual erectile dysfunction (ED) prevalence among men enrolled in an employer-sponsored health insurance (ESHI) plan and evaluate ED treatment profiles among those with an ED diagnosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional claims analysis was conducted using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database, a nationally representative sample of US workers enrolled in ESHI plans. Patients aged 18-64 with at least one ED medical diagnosis claim and continuous enrollment in a given year between 2009 and 2017 were included. Among those with an ED diagnosis, utilization rates of the following ED treatments were determined: phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5I), penile prosthesis implantation, other ED treatments (eg, vacuum pump, intraurethral suppositories), combination treatment, and no insurer-paid treatments. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2017, the annual prevalence of men with ESHI suffering from ED increased by 116%. However, in 2017, only 23% of men with an ED diagnosis received an ED therapy paid for by their ESHI plans. The proportion of men taking PDE5Is ranged from 18% in 2012 to 26% in 2015. The proportion of men with ED undergoing penile prosthesis implantation has declined in recent years (0.23% in 2009 to 0.11% in 2017). Similarly, the rate of men who received other ED treatments or combination treatment has decreased from 2009 to 2017 (0.94%-0.30% and 0.65%-0.19%, respectively). CONCLUSION: ED prevalence among men insured by an ESHI plan has notably increased, yet approximately three-quarters of these men had no claims for ED treatments, indicating substantial access gaps to treatment.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante Peniano/estatística & dados numéricos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Disfunção Erétil/economia , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/economia , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Implante Peniano/economia , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/economia , Prevalência
9.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 68(11): 57-61, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33187038

RESUMO

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability to achieve or maintain penile erection sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual activity. The prevalence increases with age. Basic and clinical research is identifying the neurovascular and humoral control of the mechanisms. The initial evaluation should differentiate erectile dysfunction from premature ejaculation and loss of libido. Myocardial insufficiency, hypogonadism and peripheral neuropathy should be looked for. Initial laboratory investigations should be restricted to identifying previously undetected medical illness that may directly contribute to erectile dysfunction. Discussing the available options with the couple is an important aspect. If erectile dysfunction is secondary to other treatable disorders these should be treated simultaneously. When other diseases that require intervention are ruled out and if there are no contraindications, therapy may be initiated with a phosphodiesterase inhibitor. In selected cases, psychosexual therapy may be beneficial. If phosphodiesterase inhibitors are contraindicated, vacuum constriction devices may be tried. Further options include intracavernosal injection, intraurethral instillation, penile revascularization and prosthesis. The availability of effective and well-tolerated oral medications has dramatically changed the clinical approach to erectile dysfunction. Pharmacotherapy is the preferred cost-effective first-line therapy in the vast majority of patients. A stepped-care approach is followed in the primary care and family practice settings. Appropriate urological, endocrine and psychiatric referrals, and shared decision-making with the couple will enable effective treatment of men with erectile dysfunction.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Disfunção Erétil/diagnóstico , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase , Prevalência , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(15): e19718, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32282728

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction refers to the continued inability of the penis to reach and maintain sufficient erections to achieve a satisfactory sex life and last at least 6 months. As part of traditional Chinese medicine, acupuncture has been widely used in clinical practice. In order to evaluate, the exact effect of acupuncture on the clinical efficacy of patients with Post-stroke Erectile dysfunction (PSED), this experiment uses randomized controlled experiments. METHODS/DESIGN: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial will recruit 103 patients who are diagnosed with PSED. Simple randomization to conventional treatment with a 1:1 allocation ratio will be used. Ten 30-min acupuncture sessions will be provided to patients assigned to the Intervention group. All participants will continue to receive conventional treatment. The selection of outcomes will be evaluated by International Erectile Function Index-5 (IIEF-5) score at week 8. DISCUSSION: This trial may provide evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for patients with PSED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ChiCTR2000030231, Registered on February 25, 2020.


Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Terapia por Acupuntura/economia , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Disfunção Erétil/diagnóstico , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Sex Med Rev ; 8(3): 497-503, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326359

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common and costly urologic condition with increasing prevalence as men age. Cost-effectiveness of ED therapies and whether cost-effectiveness varies for different populations of men remains underexplored. AIM: To review and summarize available published data on the economic evaluation of ED therapies and to identify gaps in the literature that still need to be addressed. METHODS: All relevant peer-reviewed publications and conference abstracts were reviewed and incorporated. RESULTS: There are a number of medical and surgical treatment options available for ED. The economic evaluation of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, particularly sildenafil, has been well described. However, minimal research has been conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of intracavernosal injections, intraurethral suppositories, penile prosthesis surgery, vacuum erection devices, and other emerging therapies in men with different causes of ED. CONCLUSION: Available economic evaluations of ED therapies are dated, do not reflect present-day physician, pharmaceutical, and device costs, fail to account for patient comorbidities, and may not be generalizable to today's ED patients. Substantial research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ED treatments across different patient populations, countries, and reimbursement systems. Rezaee ME, Ward CE, Brandes ER, et al. A Review of Economic Evaluations of Erectile Dysfunction Therapies. Sex Med Rev 2019;8:497-503.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/economia , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Erétil/cirurgia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Prótese de Pênis/economia , Citrato de Sildenafila/uso terapêutico , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico
12.
Int J Impot Res ; 32(2): 213-220, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31024112

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on erectile dysfunction (ED) conducted from 2007 to 2018. We searched for RCT original articles on ED published between 2007 and 2018 using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. RCT quality assessment was performed using Jadad scale, van Tulder scale, and Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool. The effects on RCT quality of including treatment methods, funding sources, institutional review board (IRB) approval statements, and intervention description to the studies were assessed. Blinding and allocation concealment were described in 67.9 and 8.7% of the RCTs, respectively. Blinding tended to decrease, but a sharp rise in blinding was observed in 2011-2012 and allocation in 2017-2018. Funding statement inclusion (60.3% overall) and intervention description (96.4% overall) tended to increase steadily. IRB statement inclusion (78.3% overall) increased (p = 0.05). Jadad scores rose significantly until 2011-2012 but decreased thereafter except 2017-2018 (p = 0.09). RCTs with funding statements had higher Jadad and van Tulder scores than unfunded RCTs (p < 0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Quality improvement has observed from 2007 to 2012 and 2017 to 2018 with Jadad scale because of increased funding, multicenter studies, and intervention description.


Assuntos
Bibliometria , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/normas , Humanos , Masculino
13.
BMJ Open ; 9(10): e030856, 2019 10 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31585974

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is known to be a common consequence of radical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) but is often under-reported and undertreated. This study aimed to explore how ED in patients with PCa is managed in real-life clinical practice, from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a UK-wide cross-sectional survey of men with ED after treatment for PCa which covered assessment and discussion of erectile function, provision of supportive care and satisfaction with management. Parallel surveys of primary and secondary HCPs were also conducted. RESULTS: Responses were received from 546 men with ED after PCa treatment, 167 primary (general practitioners and practice nurses) and 94 secondary care HCPs (urologists and urology clinical nurse specialists). Survey findings revealed inadequate management of ED in primary care, particularly underprescribing of effective management options. A fifth of men (21%) were not offered any ED management, and a similar proportion (23%) were not satisfied with the way HCPs addressed their ED concerns. There was poor communication between HCPs and men, including failure to initiate discussions about ED and/or involve partners, with 12% of men not told that ED was a risk factor of PCa treatment. These issues seemed to reflect poor access to effective ED management or services and lack of primary HCP confidence in managing ED, as well as confusion over the roles and responsibilities among both HCPs and men. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the need for better support for men from HCPs and more tailored and timely access to effective ED management after treatment for PCa. A clearly defined pathway is required for the discussion and management of ED, starting from the planning stage of PCa treatment. Improved adherence to ED management guidelines and better education and training for primary care HCPs are areas of priority.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Satisfação do Paciente , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem , Padrões de Prática Médica , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Competência Clínica , Comunicação , Estudos Transversais , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Clínicos Gerais , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermeiros Clínicos , Profissionais de Enfermagem , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Reino Unido , Urologistas
14.
Int J Clin Pract ; 73(1): e13259, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30222241

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction is common among older men; however, diagnosis and treatment compared to reported prevalence is low. We aim to identify the degree to which older men are offered treatment for the condition and determine the level of unmet need within Northern Ireland (NI). METHODOLOGY: Analysis of data collected using a cross-sectional survey was conducted for men aged ≥60 years with data weighted to the NI population by age and deprivation. Respondents answered questions on sociodemographic factors, health-related characteristics, ability to function sexually, level of sexual interest and activity, and any treatment offered to improve erections in the last 3 years. Results are presented as proportions reporting treatment receipt, with differences by respondent characteristics assessed using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 2597 respondents, 46.5% reported erectile dysfunction. One quarter (25.8%) recalled being offered either medication, devices, or specialised services to improve erections. The offer of treatment was associated with younger age, being separated or divorced, higher number of long-term conditions, and greater interest in sex. Of men reporting erectile dysfunction and offered medication, 28.8% found them helpful and currently use them. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of not being offered treatment or not finding treatment useful, 93% of men reporting erectile dysfunction have no help with the condition. This is a likely consequence of treatment availability through the NHS in NI, but also suggests that healthcare professionals need to engage more proactively with older men, discussing sexual health routinely and following up those treated for the condition.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Comportamento Sexual , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Civil , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Irlanda do Norte , Inquéritos e Questionários
15.
J Sex Med ; 14(6): 810-817, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28460994

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To improve care for patients after radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP), focus on survivorship issues such as sexual function needs to increase. Previous studies have demonstrated the burden of erectile dysfunction (ED) after RCP to be as high as 89%. AIM: To determine the rates of ED treatment use (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, injectable therapies, urethral suppositories, vacuum erection devices, and penile prosthetics) in patients with bladder cancer before and after RCP to better understand current patterns of care. METHODS: Men with bladder cancer undergoing RCP were identified in the MarketScan database (2010-2014). ED treatment use was assessed at baseline (during the 1 year before RCP) and at 6-month intervals (0-6, 7-12, 13-18, 19-24 months) after RCP. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of ED treatment use at 6-month intervals after RCP. OUTCOMES: ED treatment rates and predictors of ED treatment at 0-6, 7-12, 13-18, 19-24 month follow-up after RCP. RESULTS: At baseline, 6.5% of patients (77 of 1,176) used ED treatments. The rates of ED treatment use at 0 to 6, 7 to 12, 13 to 18, and 19 to 24 months after RCP were 15.2%, 12.7%, 8.1%, and 10.1% respectively. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors were the most commonly used treatment at all time points. In the multivariable model, predictors of ED treatment use at 0 to 6 months after RCP were age younger than 50 years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.68-6.01), baseline ED treatment use (OR = 5.75, 95% CI = 3.08-10.72), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.13-2.61), and neobladder diversion (OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.56-3.70). Baseline ED treatment use continued to be associated with ED treatment use at 6 to 12 months (OR = 5.63, 95% CI = 2.42-13.10) and 13 to 18 months (OR = 8.99, 95% CI = 3.05-26.51) after RCP. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: While the burden of ED following RCP is known to be high, overall ED treatment rates are low. These findings suggest either ED treatment is low priority for RCP patients or education about potential ED therapies may not be commonly discussed with patients following RCP. Urologists should consider discussing sexual function more frequently with their RCP patients. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include the use of a national claims database, which allows for longitudinal follow-up and detailed information on prescription medications and devices. Limitations include the lack of pathologic and oncologic outcomes data. CONCLUSION: ED treatment use after RCP is quite low. The strongest predictor of ED treatment use after RCP was baseline treatment use. These findings suggest ED treatment is a low priority for patients with RCP or education about potential ED therapies might not be commonly discussed with patients after RCP. Urologists should consider discussing sexual function more frequently with their patients undergoing RCP. Chappadi MR, Kates M, Sopko NA, et al. Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy: Analysis of a Nationwide Insurance Claims Database. J Sex Med 2017;14:810-817.


Assuntos
Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Cistectomia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Prostatectomia/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
16.
Urology ; 102: 126-129, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28024968

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of transparency of health insurance policies regarding coverage of male sexual health conditions, we examined the publicly available policy coverage documents of the largest U.S. medical insurance plans. METHODS: We selected 2 index patients across the male sexual health spectrum: (1) a phosphodiesterase type 5 refractory erectile dysfunction (ED) patient requiring intracavernosal injection therapy or penile prosthesis and (2) a 50-year-old male patient with laboratory-confirmed, symptomatic hypogonadism requiring testosterone replacement therapy as defined by endocrine society criteria. We researched the policy documents regarding coverage for standard therapies. We used breast reconstruction after mastectomy as a control. RESULTS: We queried the publicly available policy statements for 84 of the largest health-care plans in the United States. Whereas breast reconstruction policies are publicly available for 94% of the plans examined, policies of only 39% of the plans for advanced ED treatment options and 62% for hypogonadism are publicly available. Of the plans that had publicly accessible data for ED coverage, 85% viewed penile prosthesis and intracavernosal injection as medically necessary, whereas 91% viewed androgen replacement as medically necessary for our index patient. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of transparency among medical insurers regarding coverage of ED and hypogonadism in stark contrast to reconstructive breast surgery.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Hipogonadismo/terapia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
18.
J Sex Med ; 12(5): 1202-10, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25801073

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is growing interest in using exercise to treat. Although many studies have highlighted the relationship between better erectile function and exercise, black men have been underrepresented in the literature. AIMS: This study aims to determine whether or not exercise is associated with better erectile as well as sexual function in black men and define a minimum exercise threshold for which better erectile/sexual function is seen in a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Our study population consisted of 295 healthy controls from a case-control study assessing risk factors for prostate cancer conducted at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, which contained a substantial proportion of black men (n = 93; 32%). Exercise and erectile/sexual function were both determined from self-reported questionnaires. Subjects were stratified into four exercise groups: <3 (sedentary), 3-8.9 (mildly active), 9-17.9 (moderately active), and ≥18 (highly active) metabolic equivalents (MET) hours/week. The association between exercise and erectile/sexual function was addressed utilizing multivariable linear regression analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Erectile/sexual function was defined by the validated Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite sexual assessment, which was analyzed as a continuous variable (sexual function score). Clinically significant better function was defined as half a standard deviation (SD) (16.5 points). RESULTS: Median sexual function score was 53 (SD = 33). Higher exercise was associated with a better sexual function score (P < 0.001). Importantly, there was no interaction between black race and exercise (P-interaction = 0.772), meaning more exercise was linked with better erectile/sexual function regardless of race. Overall, exercise ≥18 MET hours/week predicted better erectile/sexual function (P < 0.001) with a clinically significant 17.3-point higher function. Exercise at lower levels was not statistically (P > 0.147) or clinically (≤8.14 points higher function) associated with erectile/sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: In a racially diverse population, exercise ≥18 MET hours/week is highly associated with better erectile/sexual function regardless of race.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Terapia por Exercício , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/fisiopatologia , Disfunção Erétil/psicologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
19.
Magy Onkol ; 58(3): 173-81, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25260081

RESUMO

Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery replaces many open surgery procedures in urology due to its advantages concerning post-operative morbidity. However, the technical challenges and need of learning have limited the application of this method to the work of highly qualified surgeons. The introduction of da Vinci surgical system has offered important technical advantages compared to the laparoscopic surgical procedure. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy became a largely accepted procedure. It has paved the way for urologists to start other, more complex operations, decreasing this way the operative morbidity. The purpose of this article is to overview the history of robotic surgery, its current and future states in the treatment of the cancer. We present our robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and the results.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia , Prostatectomia/instrumentação , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Robótica , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia , Idoso , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , França/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Hungria , Imageamento Tridimensional , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/economia , Prostatectomia/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Robótica/economia , Robótica/instrumentação , Robótica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/terapia
20.
J Sex Med ; 11(1): 40-50, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24314303

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Data suggest that ED is still an underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. In addition, it seems that men with ED are unsatisfied about their relationship with their physician and with the available drugs. AIM: The study aims to identify health-related characteristics and unmet needs of patients suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED) in big 5 European Union (EU) nations (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK). METHODS: Data were collected from the 2011 5EU National Health and Wellness-Survey on a population of 28,511 adult men (mean age: 47.18; SD 16.07) and was focused on men (5,184) who self-reported ED in the past 6 months. In addition, the quality of life (QoL) and work productivity/activity were explored. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health-related QoL (HRQoL) and work productivity were measured with SF-12v2 and WPAI validated psychometric tools. RESULTS: One in every 20 young men (age 18-39) across 5EU experienced ED in the past 6 months. About half of men (2,702/5,184; [52%]) with ED across all ages did not discuss their condition with their physician. Interestingly, among those men who did discuss their condition with their physician, 68% (1,668/2,465) do not currently use medication. These findings were more evident in the age group of 18-39 years. Only 48% (2,465/5,184) had a closer relationship with their physician, suggesting that this quality of relationship may be unsatisfactory. Compared with controls, ED patients have a significantly higher intrapsychic and relational psychopathological comorbid burden and relevant decreasing in HRQoL, with a significantly higher impairment on work productivity/activity. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that there is a need for a new therapeutic paradigm in ED treatment which images the achievement of a new alliance between physician and patient. Hence, alternative drug delivery strategies may reduce the psychological and social impact of this disease.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/psicologia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Comorbidade , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , França/epidemiologia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Autorrelato , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA