The cost-effectiveness of intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering in people with peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: People with peripheral artery disease are at a high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Randomized controlled trials suggest that intensive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors is an effective strategy to prevent these events. This study estimated the potential benefit and cost-effectiveness of administrating PCSK9 inhibitors to a cohort of participants with peripheral artery disease. METHODS: A total of 783 participants with intermittent claudication (IC; n = 582) or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI; n = 201) were prospectively recruited from three hospitals in Australia. Serum LDL-C was measured at recruitment, and the occurrence of MACE and MALE was recorded over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 2.2 years (0.3-5.7 years). The potential benefit of administering a PCSK9 inhibitor was estimated by calculating the absolute risk reduction and numbers needed to treat (NNT) based on relative risk reductions reported in published randomized trials. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year gained was estimated. RESULTS: Intensive LDL-C lowering was estimated to lead to an absolute risk reduction in MACE of 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-9.3; NNT, 16) and MALE of 13.7% (95% CI, 4.3-21.5; NNT, 7) in people with CLTI compared with 3.2% (95% CI, 1.1-4.8; NNT, 32) and 5.3% (95% CI, 1.7-8.3; NNT, 19) in people with IC. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over a 10-year period were $55,270 USD and $32,800 USD for participants with IC and CLTI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that treatment with a PCSK9 inhibitor is likely to be cost-effective in people with CLTI.

Gender differences in the impact of metabolic syndrome components on mortality in older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The influence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on mortality may be influenced by age- and gender-related changes affecting the impact of individual MetS components. We investigated gender differences in the association between MetS components and mortality in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective studies were identified through a systematic literature review up to June 2019. Random-effect meta-analyses were run to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality associated with the presence of MetS components (abdominal obesity, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, high fasting glycemia, and high blood pressure) in older men and women. Meta-analyses considering all-cause (103,859 individuals, 48,830 men, 55,029 women; 10 studies) and CV mortality (94,965 individuals, 44,699 men, 50,266 women; 8 studies) did not reveal any significant association for abdominal obesity and high triglycerides in either gender. Low HDL was associated with increased all-cause (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02-1.32) and CV mortality (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.03-1.74) among women, while weaker results were found for men. High fasting glycemia was associated with higher all-cause mortality in older women (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.22-1.50) more than in older men (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.13-1.30), and CV mortality only in the former (RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.04-1.78). Elevated blood pressure was associated with increased all-cause mortality (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03-1.32) and showed marginal significant results for CV death only among women. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of MetS components on mortality in older people present some gender differences, with low HDL cholesterol, hyperglycemia, and elevated blood pressure being more strongly associated to all-cause and CV mortality in women.

Baseline Predictors of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Systolic Blood Pressure Goal Attainment After 1 Year in the ISCHEMIA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Risk factor control is the cornerstone of managing stable ischemic heart disease but is often not achieved. Predictors of risk factor control in a randomized clinical trial have not been described. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) randomized individuals with at least moderate inducible ischemia and obstructive coronary artery disease to an initial invasive or conservative strategy in addition to optimal medical therapy. The primary aim of this analysis was to determine predictors of meeting trial goals for LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, goal <70 mg/dL) or systolic blood pressure (SBP, goal <140 mm Hg) at 1 year post-randomization. We included all randomized participants in the ISCHEMIA trial with baseline and 1-year LDL-C and SBP values by January 28, 2019. Among the 3984 ISCHEMIA participants (78% of 5179 randomized) with available data, 35% were at goal for LDL-C, and 65% were at goal for SBP at baseline. At 1 year, the percent at goal increased to 52% for LDL-C and 75% for SBP. Adjusted odds of 1-year LDL-C goal attainment were greater with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03-1.20] per 10 years), lower baseline LDL-C (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.17-1.22] per 10 mg/dL), high-intensity statin use (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.12-1.51]), nonwhite race (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.07-1.63]), and North American enrollment compared with other regions (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.06-1.66]). Women were less likely than men to achieve 1-year LDL-C goal (OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.58-0.80]). Adjusted odds of 1-year SBP goal attainment were greater with lower baseline SBP (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.22-1.33] per 10 mm Hg) and with North American enrollment (OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.04-1.76]). CONCLUSIONS: In ISCHEMIA, older age, male sex, high-intensity statin use, lower baseline LDL-C, and North American location predicted 1-year LDL-C goal attainment, whereas lower baseline SBP and North American location predicted 1-year SBP goal attainment. Future studies should examine the effects of sex disparities, international practice patterns, and provider behavior on risk factor control.

Comorbidity burden in systemic sclerosis: beyond disease-specific complications.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic, systemic disease characterized by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, vasculopathy, and auto-immune activation. On the top of severe organ involvement such as interstitial lung and myocardial fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, and renal crisis, individuals diagnosed with SSc may suffer from a number of comorbidities. This is a narrative review according to published recommendations and we searched the online databases MEDLINE and EMBASE using as key words the following terms: systemic sclerosis, scleroderma, myocardial fibrosis in combination with micro- and macro-vascular disease, cardiac involvement, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease and coronary arteries, infections, cancer, depression, osteoporosis, and dyslipidemia. Although data are usually inconclusive it appears that comorbidities with significant impact on life expectancy, namely cardiovascular disease, infections, and cancer as well as phycological disorders affecting emotional and mental health are highly prevalent in SSc population. Thereafter, the aim of this review is to summarize the occurrence and the clinical significance of such comorbidities in SSc population and to discuss how rheumatologists can incorporate the management of these conditions in daily clinical practice.

Statins: Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Cardiovascular diseases secondary to atherosclerosis are the primary causes of early death and disability worldwide and dyslipidaemia represents one of the most important modifiable risk factors. Among lipid abnormalities that define it, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary target of therapy, since multiple randomized controlled trials have shown the positive impact of its reduction on atherosclerosis development. For their ability to lower LDL-C levels, statins are the most studied drugs in cardiovascular disease prevention, of proven utility in slowing the progression or even determining regression of atherosclerosis. In addition, they have ancillary proprieties, with positive effects on the mechanisms involved in the development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the so-called "pleiotropic mechanisms". Although sharing the same mechanism of action, the different chemical and pharmacological characteristics of each kind of statins affect their absorption, bioavailability, plasma protein binding properties, excretion and solubility. In this overview, we analysed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms of this class of drugs, specifying the differences among the molecules, along with the economic aspects. Detailed knowledge of characteristics and differences of each kind of available statin could help the physician in the correct choice, based also on patient's clinical profile, of this essential tool with a demonstrated high cost-effectiveness both in primary than in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Statins and Elderly: From Clinical Trials to Daily Practice.

Elderly patients represent a rising social problem, due to the exponential growth of persons in these age groups and their atherothrombotic burden. The management of this population still raises several challenges, requiring a balance between elevated cardiovascular risk, clinical complexity, frailty and co-morbidities. Statins represent the main pillar in cardiovascular prevention, lowering serum cholesterol and reducing mortality and ischemic events, especially in high-risk patients. Yet, elderly patients have often been excluded from major clinical trials of statins, thus limiting the experience with these drugs in advanced age. Moreover, important barriers to the use of statins in the elderly exist due to potential risks attributed to altered metabolism, comorbidities, polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions and financial constraints. This situation has led to a "statin paradox", since high-risk elderly patients, that would most benefit from the use of statins, may be undertreated with these drugs in real life. The vague indications provided by guidelines mean that this issue is still debated, especially regarding primary prevention. Nevertheless, the benefits in outcome offered by statins cannot be neglected. Efforts should be made in order to focus on the importance of statin use in the elderly and to provide clinicians with adequate tools for case by case decisions.

Associations between cardiovascular disease, cancer, and very low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the REasons for Geographical and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

Aims: Relatively little is known about the health outcomes associated with very low plasma concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) mainly because of the small numbers of individuals with such extreme values included in clinical trials. We, therefore, investigated the association between low and very low HDL-C concentration at baseline and incident all-cause-mortality, death from malignant disease (i.e. cancer), and with fatal or non-fatal incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in individuals from the Reasons for Geographical And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Methods and results: Analysis was based on 21 751 participants from the REGARDS study who were free of CHD, other cardiovascular disease, and cancer at baseline and were categorized by baseline HDL-C into <30 mg/dL (very low), 30-<40 mg/dL (low), and ≥40 mg/dL (reference). A series of incremental Cox proportional hazards models were employed to assess the association between the HDL-C categories and outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using both complete case methods and multiple imputations with chained equations. After adjustment for age, race, and sex, the hazard ratios (HRs) comparing the lowest and highest HDL-C categories were 1.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.73] for all-cause mortality, 1.35 (95% CI 1.03-1.77) for cancer-specific mortality and 1.39 (95% CI 0.99-1.96) for incident CHD. These associations became non-significant in models adjusting for demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and treatment for dyslipidaemia. We found evidence for an HDL paradox, whereby low HDL (30-<40 mg/dL) was associated with reduced risk of incident CHD in black participants in a fully adjusted complete case model (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.46-0.88) and after multiple imputation analyses (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.58-0.98). HDL-C (<30 mg/dL) was significantly associated with poorer outcomes in women for all outcomes, especially with respect to cancer mortality (HR 2.31; 95% CI 1.28-4.16) in a fully adjusted complete case model, replicated using multiple imputation (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.03-3.20). Conclusion: Low HDL-C was associated with reduced risk of incident CHD in black participants suggesting a potential HDL paradox for incident CHD. Very low HDL-C in women was significantly associated with cancer mortality in a fully adjusted complete case model.

Predicted impact of lipid lowering therapy on cardiovascular and economic outcomes of Swedish atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease guideline.

BACKGROUND: The effects on cardiovascular disease (CVD) by treatment recommendations on prevention of atherosclerotic CVD remain to be evaluated. The objectives were to assess treatment gap for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) according to guidelines, potential impact on CVD outcomes, and possible avoided economic costs, in post myocardial infarction (MI) patients, if target LDL-C levels of ≤1.8 mmol/L would be achieved. METHODS: All patients registered in the Swedish Secondary Prevention after Heart Intensive care Admission register, with one-year post-MI follow-up during 2013 were selected. The REACH risk prediction and a calibrated model for recurrent cardiovascular events and death were used to estimate unadjusted risk prediction based on the REACH equation henceforth called base case, and calibrated CVD outcomes based on gender-specific risk factors. The predicted impact of the LDL-C reduction on the risk of CVD was based on the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists´ Collaboration findings. RESULTS: A sample of n = 5904 patients (74% men) with a mean age of 64 years were included. Around 70% did not reach LDL-C target ≤1.8 mmol/L. Over a 10-year period, 820-2262 events were predicted to occur in those who did not reach target corresponding to 20% - 55% risk of CVD events. To achieve LDL-C target, the mean LDL-C had to be reduced by 0.73 mmol/L (29%). If this LDL-C reduction was achieved, 195-544 life years, 132-343 CVD events, and 7.9-20.9 million Swedish crowns (MSEK) of direct costs, and 19.3-51.0 MSEK of total costs would be avoided. CONCLUSION: Lowering of LDL cholesterol to achieve target levels according to guidelines for post-MI patients may lead to fewer cardiovascular events and avoidance of event costs.

Effects of atorvastatin on renal function in patients with dyslipidemia and chronic kidney disease: assessment of clinical usefulness in CKD patients with atorvastatin (ASUCA) trial.

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia is a risk factor for the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). While conventional lipid lowering therapy provides a benefit to CKD management, the effect of statins on eGFR remains unclear. METHODS: A prospective, multi-center, open-labeled, randomized trial. Total of 349 CKD patients with hyperlipidemia were randomized into 2 groups, and followed for 2 years. Group A included patients who were treated with atorvastatin. Group C were treated with conventional lipid lowering drugs other than statin. Primary endpoint was changes in eGFR. Secondary endpoints included changes in urinary albumin excretion, serum LDL-C, serum triglyceride, cardio-vascular events and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: As the primary endpoint, eGFR decreased by 2.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 in Group A and by 2.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 in Group C, indicating that there was no difference in change of eGFR between the two groups. As secondary endpoints, atorvastatin succeeded to reduce serum LDL-C level significantly and rapidly, but conventional therapy did not. In fact, mean LDL-C level did not reach the target level of 100 mg/dl in Group C. Serum triglyceride was lowered only by atorvastatin, but not conventional drugs. The number of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality did not differ between in two groups. CONCLUSION: The ASUCA (Assessment of Clinical Usefulness in CKD Patients with Atorvastatin) trial demonstrated that atorvastatin failed to exhibit reno-protections compared to conventional therapy in Japanese patients with dyslipidemia and CKD. It would be due in part to the ability of atorvastatin to more potently reduce serum LDL and triglycerides compared to conventional therapy.

Combined effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on mortality in patients with newly diagnosed dyslipidemia: A nationwide Korean cohort study from 2002 to 2013.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The study aims to determine whether dyslipidemia patients living in less affluent neighborhood are at a higher risk of mortality compared to those living in more affluent neighborhoods. METHODS AND RESULTS: A population-based cohort study was conducted using a stratified representative sampling from the National Health Insurance claim data from 2002 to 2013. The target subjects comprise patients newly diagnosed with dyslipidemia receiving medication. We performed a survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model. Of 11,946 patients with dyslipidemia, 1053 (8.8%) subjects died during the follow-up period. Of the dyslipidemia patients earning a middle-class income, the adjusted HR in less affluent neighborhoods was higher than that in the more affluent neighborhoods compared to the reference category of high individual SES in more affluent neighborhoods (less affluent; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35-1.99 vs. more affluent; HR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.20-1.81, respectively). We obtained consistent results in patients with lower income, wherein the adjusted HR in less affluent neighborhoods was higher than that in more affluent neighborhoods (less affluent; HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.16-1.97 vs. more affluent; HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.92, respectively). CONCLUSION: Living in a less affluent neighborhood contributes to higher mortality among dyslipidemia patients. The individual- and neighborhood-level variables cumulatively affect individuals such that the most at-risk individuals include those having both individual- and neighborhood-level risk factors. These findings raise important clinical and public health concerns and indicate that neighborhood SES approaches should be essentially considered in health-care policies similar to individual SES.

Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmissions of Individuals with Decompensated Cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with cirrhosis have a high rate of 30-day hospital readmission that affects their quality of life and contributes to increased healthcare-related costs. The aim of our study was to identify frequency, predictors, and preventable causes of hospital readmissions among patients with decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of decompensated cirrhosis admitted to Dayton VA Medical Center between 2009 and 2013. Demographics, clinical factors, laboratory values, and outcomes were recorded. Univariate analysis was performed using independent samples t tests and Wilcoxon rank sums tests for continuous variables and χ(2) or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed for variables found to be significant by univariate analysis to predict the risk factors for 30-day readmission. A detailed chart review was conducted for all patients readmitted within 30 days by a single gastroenterologist to identify the reason for readmission and to decide whether any of these readmissions were preventable. RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate for decompensated cirrhotic patients was 27.03%. The risk factors for 30-day readmission were higher body mass index (BMI), lower body temperature, higher blood urea nitrogen, higher creatinine, more cirrhosis-related complications, and more readmissions per year per univariate analysis. Multivariable analysis revealed only BMI as a significant predictor of 30-day readmission (P = 0.023). A total of 36.7% of 30-day readmissions were possibly preventable. CONCLUSIONS: The independent variable that predicted 30-day readmission in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was higher BMI. Approximately one-third of 30-day readmissions were possibly preventable. These findings support the need to develop specific interventions for disease management to improve patient care and save on extraneous healthcare costs.

[Analysis of cost-effectiveness of simvastatin versus atorvastatin in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events within the Brazilian public healthcare system]. / Análise de custo-efetividade da sinvastatina versus atorvastatina na prevenção secundária de eventos cardiovasculares no Sistema Único de Saúde Brasileiro.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to perform an economic evaluation analyzing the treatment with atorvastatin and simvastatin in comparison to placebo treatment, within the Brazilian Public Healthcare System (SUS) scenario, for patients with high risk of cardiovascular disease; analyzing if the additional cost related to statin treatment is justified by the clinical benefits expected, in terms of cardiovascular event and mortality reduction. METHODS: Cardiovascular event risk and mortality risk were used as outcomes. Statin efficacy at LDL-c and cardiovascular events levels lowering data was obtained from a systematic review of literature. A decision analytic model was developed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing atorvastatin 10mg/day and simvastatin 40 mg/day to placebo treatment in patients with dyslipidemia in Brazil. The target population of this study was a hypothetic cohort of men and women with a mean age of 50 years old and high risk of cardiovascular disease. The model includes only direct costs obtained from Ambulatory and Hospital Information System and Price Database of Brazilian Ministry of Health. The comparative cost-effectiveness analysis itself was done through Excel spreadsheets covering a 5 -years time horizon. RESULTS: The result shows that atorvastatin 10mg/day in comparison to placebo has higher cost with higher effectiveness in the time horizon of 5 years (Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio of R$ 433.065,05 per life year gained). In this scenario atorvastatin is not cost effective in comparison to placebo. The simvastatin 40 mg/day appears to be a strategy with lower cost and higher effectiveness in comparison to placebo, in the time horizon analyzed (5 years). In the multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis, simvastatin showed 53% of the results in the quadrant with greater effectiveness and lower cost. CONCLUSIONS: This study is an important tool for public decision makers. The study can be used in the decision process of increasing cardiovascular disease treatment access with budgetary sustainability for Ministry of Health. In comparison to placebo, the results show that sinvastatin is a cost saving strategy while atorvastatin is not cost effective.

Cardiovascular risk assessment in haemophilia patients.

Haemophilia patients have a reduced cardiovascular mortality, which may be the result of a lifelong deficiency of factor VIII or IX. On the other hand, the prevalence of risk factors may differ in these chronically ill patients compared to the general population. The prevalence of risk factors and expected risk of cardiovascular disease was compared in haemophilia patients and healthy controls. In adult haemophilia A and B patients, body mass index, blood pressure, cholesterol levels and fasting glucose levels were measured and compared to healthy age-matched males. The expected risk of mortality due to cardiovascular disease was calculated using a European risk prediction algorithm (SCORE). A total of 100 haemophilia A and B patients and 200 healthy controls were analysed. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (range 18-83). The number of haemophiliacs with hyperglycaemia (24%) and hypertension (51%) was higher than in the controls (p-values 0.001 and 0.03, respectively). The mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level in cases was lower than the controls (3.02 mM (0.69-6.57) and 3.60 mM (1.68-5.95), respectively, p < 0.001). Fewer cases had increased LDL levels (p=0.045). No difference was found in the 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk >10% between cases and controls (12% and 7%, respectively, p = 0.18). The prevalence of risk factors and expected risk of cardiovascular disease in haemophilia patients is comparable to the general population. This strengthens the hypothesis that hypocoagulability may reduce cardiovascular mortality in haemophilia patients.

Artificial neural network versus multiple logistic function to predict 25-year coronary heart disease mortality in the Seven Countries Study.

AIMS AND METHODS: We investigated 12 763 men enrolled in the Seven Countries Study and 25-year coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality to compare the predictive discrimination of the multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network versus multiple logistic function based on four standard, continuous risk factors, selected a priori. The patients were grouped according to geographical distribution, which also parallels CHD mortality risk. Logistic model solutions were estimated for each geographic area. Training neural network models were estimated in one high risk (US) and one low risk (Italy) population and each was rerun in each nonindex population. RESULTS: CHD mortality prediction by training MLP neural network or multiple logistic function had similar (0.669-0.699) receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC). The rerun of MLP neural network models derived from the US and Italy yielded comparable AUC similar to the logistic solutions in Northern and Eastern Europe, but higher AUC in two areas [0.633 (logistic) vs. 0.665 or 0.666 (neural network: P<0.05) in Southern Europe and 0.676 (logistic) vs. 0.725 or 0.737 (neural network: P<0.01) in Japan]. CONCLUSION: This is the first investigation performed on epidemiological data to suggest a good performance in predicting long-term CHD mortality, on the basis of few continuous risk factors, of a training neural network model that could be rerun on different populations with satisfactory findings.

Preventing cardiovascular disease among Canadians: what are the potential benefits of treating hypertension or dyslipidemia?

BACKGROUND: Treatments for hypertension and dyslipidemia to prevent the development of cardiovascular disease compete for the same finite number of health care dollars. Therefore, the potential benefits of treating Canadians without cardiovascular disease or diabetes who would currently be targeted by the national treatment guidelines were estimated and compared. STUDY DESIGN: Canadian Heart Health Surveys data were used to estimate the number of Canadians requiring intervention. The Cardiovascular Life Expectancy Model, a previously validated Markov model, was used to calculate the increased life expectancy and decreased morbidity associated with treating risk factors to target. RESULTS: Among 8.44 million adults 40 to 74 years of age without cardiovascular disease or diabetes, it was estimated that approximately 2.33 million would require treatment for dyslipidemia and 2.34 million for hypertension. The estimated Framingham 10-year coronary risk averaged 12.4% versus 9.6%, respectively. Treating dyslipidemia was associated with an average increased life expectancy of 1.67 years and 1.81 years of life free of cardiovascular disease. Treating hypertension was expected to increase life expectancy by 0.94 years and years of life free of cardiovascular disease by 1.29 years. The population benefits associated with treating dyslipidemia or hypertension would be 2.5 million and 1.4 million person years of life saved, respectively. Overall, the person years of treatment required to save one year of life was estimated to average 20 years for dyslipidemia therapy and 38 years for hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: The potential benefits associated with treating hypertension or dyslipidemia to prevent cardiovascular disease are substantial. However, compared with hypertension guidelines, dyslipidemia guidelines target higher-risk patients. Accordingly, given the relative efficacy of each treatment, the forecasted benefits associated with treating dyslipidemia are substantially greater than those associated with hypertension therapy.

Metabolism, lifestyle and bipolar affective disorder.

Lifestyle, illness and treatment factors in people with bipolar disorder (BD) may confer additional risk of morbidity and mortality to the increasing rates of obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular mortality in the general population.The aim of this review is to examine whether the risk of obesity and related morbidity and mortality are raised in BD, and possible contributory effects of lifestyle, illness and treatment factors to this risk.Systematic search of Medline and Cochrane Collaboration for relevant studies followed by a critical review of literature was carried out.Mortality from cardiovascular causes and pulmonary embolism (standardized mortality ratio approximately 2.0), and morbidity from obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus may be increased in BD compared to the general population. Reduced exercise and poor diet, frequent depressive episodes, comorbidity with substance misuse and poor quality general medical care contribute to the additional risk of these medical problems in people with BD. There is no evidence that patients with BD are more sensitive than other patients to weight gain and medical problems associated with long-term use of psychotropic medication; in fact long-term treatment with lithium, antipsychotics and tricyclic antidepressants may reduce overall mortality. Psychiatrists, general practitioners and other health professionals should work together to systematically assess and manage weight gain and related medical problems to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with obesity in BD. There is insufficient evidence to associate any of these factors with specific drug treatments. More research is required to understand how BD changes the risk for physical health comorbidity.